结论 - ThinkPad P16v Gen 3 是一款出色的移动工作站
在测试中，ThinkPad P16v Gen 3 作为移动工作站的表现相当令人信服，获得了良好的总体评价。除了电池续航时间长之外，系统性能良好，连接众多，维护选项也非常不错。TouchPad 和 TrackPoint 键的质量非常高，但键盘的质量一般，肯定还有改进的余地（尤其是与 ThinkPad P1 16 Gen 8 相比）。
作为一款相对经济实惠的工作站，它的特点首先体现在外壳上，因为这里只使用了塑料，而且在稳定性（尤其是中间的键盘区域）和铰链（明显的摇晃）方面也有值得批评的地方。显示屏（包括 OLED）仅提供 60 Hz 面板，而标准 IPS 型号的亮度超过 500 cd/m²，色彩准确且完全覆盖 sRGB。
我们希望性能能再高一些，尤其是显卡的性能。Nvidia RTX PRO 2000（Blackwell，相当于GeForce RTX 5060）的最大功耗仅为 60 瓦，因此与 115 瓦的最大功耗相去甚远（可提高约 30% 的性能）。考虑到 16 英寸的大机箱，这一点相对较弱。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
测试设备可从我们的借用Campuspoint价格为 2,825 欧元（约合人民币 3277 元）（或 2,529 欧元/约合人民币 2933 元的校园计划），P16v G3 可 在联想配置，价格为2,469 欧元（约合人民币 2864 元）。
ThinkPad P16v Gen3 是联想目前全面移动工作站的入门级机型。我们测试的 21RS000DGE 机型配备了 酷睿至尊 7 255H、32 GB 内存、Nvidia RTX PRO 2000 Nvidia RTX PRO 20001 TB 固态硬盘和亮度为 500 cd/m² 的全高清屏幕，售价 2825 欧元（约合人民币 3277 元）。
规格
箱子和设备
尽管价格不菲，但从外壳上就能看出这是一款入门级工作站，因为它只使用了塑料。设计是当前 ThinkPads 的典型风格，包括难看的摄像头驼峰。做工基本上不错，但稳定性令人失望，尤其是考虑到底座相当厚。特别是键盘的中间区域会有明显的凹陷，但我们无法听到任何嘎吱嘎吱的声音。显示屏盖子的表现要好一些，但铰链会有一点跳动（最大开启角度为 180 度）。特别是光滑的盖子非常容易沾染指纹，也很难清洁。维护选项整体上非常不错（2x 内存、2x SSD）。
在连接方面没有什么可抱怨的，但两个 Thunderbolt 4 端口中的一个总是被电源装置占用。Wi-Fi 7 模块实现了良好而稳定的传输速率，还有一个以太网端口可用。此外，还为 WWAN 模块预留了空间，但天线没有预路由（不支持 WWAN）。读卡器的传输速率一般，500 万像素网络摄像头（带快门和红外功能）可拍摄可用照片。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Workstation (49.6 - 189.3, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Workstation (87.6 - 227, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
可持续性
联想提供了有关二氧化碳平衡和使用回收材料的大量信息。
输入设备 - 平均键盘
包括数字键盘在内的背光键盘也达到了当前 ThinkPad 的标准，尽管在当前的产品系列中还有更好的型号（例如 ThinkPad P1 16 G8).总的来说，我们认为打字感觉舒适而精确，但竞争对手至少也能做到这一点。由于采用了专用的 TrackPoint 按钮，ClickPad（11.5 x 6.7 厘米/~4.5 x ~2.6 英寸）按现代标准来看相当小，但操作性极佳，下部区域的机械点击也非常优质。TrackPoint 按钮也是如此。
显示屏 - 500 cd/m² 的 IPS
联想只为 P16v Gen 3 提供 60 Hz 屏幕（IPS 和 OLED），考虑到其高昂的价格，这有点令人惊讶。我们的测试设备安装的是标准的全高清 IPS 型号（1920 x 1200 像素，16:10），表面为磨砂处理。主观画面印象总体不错，但仔细观察会发现明亮区域略有颗粒感。没有出现 PWM 闪烁，响应时间一般也不明显。
平均亮度高达 554 cd/m²，加上 0.33 cd/m² 的黑阶，对比度很高（约为 1,700:1）。在我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析时，出厂的色彩配置文件已经显示出了良好的性能，但我们通过自己的校准还能进一步改善显示效果。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 565 cd/m²
Contrast: 1712:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}
calibrated: 0.7
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
70.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
68.4% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
CCT: 6534 K
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE M160NW49 R0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 Samsung ATNA60KA02-0, Tandem OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | HP ZBook X G1i 16 LG Philips LGD07B3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A AUOA0A9, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE N160JCA-GT1, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 27% | 28% | 0% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 68.4 | 98.8 44% | 97.2 42% | 69.1 1% | 65.8 -4% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.7 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 97.7 -2% | 96.8 -3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 70.6 | 97.5 38% | 99.9 42% | 71 1% | 67.8 -4% |
| Response Times | 97% | -51% | 53% | -17% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 39.2 ? | 0.57 ? 99% | 45.5 ? -16% | 13.6 ? 65% | 29.4 ? 25% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 14.1 ? | 0.73 ? 95% | 26.1 ? -85% | 8.4 ? 40% | 22.4 ? -59% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1199 | 26536 ? | |||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 18 | 47 | |||
| Screen | 15% | -41% | -35% | -27% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 565 | 561.8 -1% | 461.8 -18% | 470.7 -17% | 540 -4% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 554 | 566 2% | 427 -23% | 431 -22% | 516 -7% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 90 | 99 10% | 88 -2% | 88 -2% | 93 3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.33 | 0.46 -39% | 0.57 -73% | 0.37 -12% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1712 | 1004 -41% | 826 -52% | 1459 -15% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 1.29 28% | 4.08 -127% | 2.16 -20% | 3.4 -89% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.2 | 2.96 30% | 8.1 -93% | 4.39 -5% | 5.6 -33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.7 | 0.81 -16% | 0.75 -7% | 1.37 -96% | 0.9 -29% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 1.4 52% | 3.5 -21% | 3.7 -28% | 4.5 -55% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.23 99% | 2.15 102% | 2.38 92% | 2.51 88% |
| CCT | 6534 99% | 6319 103% | 6715 97% | 6765 96% | 6294 103% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 46% /
32% | -21% /
-28% | 6% /
-15% | -16% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8083 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - Arrow Lake 和 RTX PRO 2000
测试条件
联想的能耗曲线与 ThinkPads 上的 Windows 设置直接相关。我们在最佳性能模式下进行了基准测试和测量。
处理器
测试设备包含 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 255H(箭湖），短时间功耗可达 115 瓦，连续功耗为 70 瓦。CPU 性能总体不错，即使某些竞争对手的速度还要稍快一些。在电池模式下，处理器的最大功耗为 40 瓦，这也是多核性能降低约 14% 的原因。
Cinebench R15 多耐久性测试
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Workstation (14055 - 38520, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (16105 - 22578, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (1874 - 2152, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (1712 - 2206, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Workstation (5471 - 15043, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (6356 - 8860, n=17) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (748 - 826, n=17) | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average of class Workstation (671 - 849, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Workstation (2404 - 5810, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (2414 - 3444, n=17) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (258 - 322, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (191.4 - 328, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (157 - 293, n=17) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average of class Workstation (91 - 261, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Workstation (53407 - 116969, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (42155 - 68652, n=18) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Average of class Workstation (4981 - 6960, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (4589 - 6385, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (12196 - 20887, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (11979 - 17489, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (2712 - 2939, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average of class Workstation (2384 - 3028, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Average of class Workstation (11542 - 25554, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (11348 - 17218, n=17) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (1938 - 2121, n=17) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average of class Workstation (1759 - 2183, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Average of class Workstation (14.4 - 40.5, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (13.7 - 26.5, n=17) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (41.1 - 61.6, n=17) | |
| Average of class Workstation (37.1 - 74.7, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (0.4233 - 0.515, n=17) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (0.3825 - 0.603, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Average of class Workstation | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (10658 - 61611, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (13863 - 24741, n=15) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average of class Workstation (56664 - 186971, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (71030 - 119222, n=15) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Workstation (2608 - 8975, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (3408 - 5548, n=15) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Average of class Workstation (60778 - 144411, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (59098 - 68460, n=15) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Average of class Workstation (7906 - 29343, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (6716 - 8971, n=15) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average of class Workstation (27301 - 98153, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (37031 - 63347, n=15) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (56077 - 187841, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (58402 - 83568, n=15) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Workstation (742 - 2148, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (822 - 1316, n=15) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (5580 - 32891, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (7384 - 13231, n=15) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (23836 - 65787, n=15) | |
| Average of class Workstation (37151 - 93684, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
系统性能
在日常使用中，ThinkPad P16v Gen 3 是一台响应速度非常快的电脑，基准测试结果也非常好。测试期间没有出现稳定性问题。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 -4! | |
| Average of class Workstation | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop (9625 - 9723, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average of class Workstation (6436 - 9723, n=22, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop (10650 - 10921, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average of class Workstation (9622 - 11157, n=22, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop (18083 - 18261, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (8789 - 18261, n=22, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop (12443 - 12631, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average of class Workstation (7744 - 15631, n=22, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop (1942 - 1953, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (1307 - 2267, n=25, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop (1834 - 1836, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (1130 - 2028, n=25, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop (2211 - 2232, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average of class Workstation (1657 - 2725, n=25, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop (1520 - 1622, n=2) | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (993 - 1908, n=25, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop (322 - 330, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (260 - 360, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop (298 - 307, n=2) | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average of class Workstation (189.2 - 323, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Average of class Workstation (411 - 538, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop (448 - 461, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 9723 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (39188 - 110930, n=15) | |
| Average of class Workstation (56003 - 164795, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (43703 - 90552, n=15) | |
| Average of class Workstation (55795 - 121563, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Workstation (55663 - 214520, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (36438 - 82641, n=15) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (107.6 - 147.2, n=15) | |
| Average of class Workstation (84.5 - 165.2, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试（上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时显示出轻微的限制。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
三星 PM9E1（1 TB，879 GB 可用容量）是 PCIe 5.0 固态硬盘，已安装在我们的测试设备中，但两个 M.2-2280 插槽仅通过 PCIe 4.0 连接。因此，传输速率最高也只有 7 GB/秒左右，而不是 13-14 GB/秒。不过，性能仍然不错，即使在长时间负载的情况下也能保持稳定。
* ... smaller is better
连续读取性能DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
图形处理器是专业的 Nvidia RTX PRO 2000(Blackwell, 8 GB VRAM），通过 Optimus 技术开启。芯片本身与 GeForce RTX 5060但就 P16v Gen 3 而言，只实现了 60 瓦的版本（最大功率可达 115 瓦），考虑到其庞大的外壳，这多少有些令人失望。不过，该细分市场中的其他移动工作站也有类似情况（最大 75 瓦），因此图形性能也不相上下。我们还将 115 瓦版的 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑纳入比较范围，其运行速度整整提高了 31%。在连续负载情况下，图形性能完全保持稳定，但在电池模式下 GPU 的功耗可能只有 25 瓦（性能-56%）。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 29308 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23134 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9371 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 1932 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 9029 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Average of class Workstation (10 - 95, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop (22 - 25, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Average of class Workstation (16 - 150, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop (42 - 45, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Average of class Workstation (148 - 472, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop (266 - 273, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
* ... smaller is better
| SPECviewperf 15 | |
| 3840x2160 Siemens NX 2406 (snx-05) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| 3840x2160 Unreal Engine 5.4.2 (unreal_engine-01) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| 3840x2160 Solidworks 2024 (solidworks-08) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| 3840x2160 Tuvok (medical-04) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| 3840x2160 Maya 2025 (maya-07) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| 3840x2160 Enscape 4.0 (enscape-01) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| 3840x2160 OpendTect (energy-04) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| 3840x2160 Creo 9 (creo-04) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| 3840x2160 Blender 3.6 (blender-01) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| 3840x2160 3ds Max 2023 (3dsmax-08) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
游戏性能
RTX PRO 2000 RTX PRO 2000RTX PRO 2000 完全能够胜任游戏，专业驱动程序也完全没有问题。原则上，大多数现代游戏都能以原始分辨率和高/最高细节播放，不会出现任何问题。我们最近在另一篇文章中介绍了 8GB VRAM 的局限性。 另一篇文章.
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE -1! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (19.6 - 152.4, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Average of class Workstation (23.7 - 205, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Average of class Workstation (18.1 - 156.1, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (26.4 - 197.6, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Average of class Workstation (53.6 - 418, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE | |
| HP ZBook X G1i 16 | |
| Average of class Workstation (50.7 - 178.4, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 174.7 | 117.7 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 174.2 | 159.8 | 151.6 | 142.8 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 199.5 | 127.3 | 98.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 105.4 | 95.2 | 78.8 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 469 | 241 | 194.1 | 167.8 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 121.3 | 96 | 81.4 | 81.2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 119.5 | 93.5 | 79.1 | 70.1 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 200 | 194.8 | 165.5 | 53.3 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
在日常工作中，散热装置仍然非常安静（最大 29.2 dB(A)），但当元件承受更大压力时，声音就会明显变大。在最佳性能模式下，我们在游戏和压力测试中测得 47.1 dB(A)（平衡：43.2 dB(A)，最佳能效：39.9 dB(A)，电池：37 dB(A)）。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25.9 / 25.9 / 29.2 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 37.5 / 47.1 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.9 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE Ultra 7 255H, RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 Ultra 7 255H, RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop | HP ZBook X G1i 16 Ultra 7 265H, RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop | HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A R7 8845HS, RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop | Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, Radeon 890M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 13% | 7% | 12% | -3% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 25.9 | 23.1 11% | 23.7 8% | 23.5 9% | 25.9 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25.9 | 23.1 11% | 23.7 8% | 23.8 8% | 25.9 -0% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25.9 | 23.1 11% | 23.7 8% | 24.2 7% | 25.9 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 29.2 | 23.1 21% | 23.7 19% | 24.2 17% | 28.5 2% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 37.5 | 27.3 27% | 32.7 13% | 25.4 32% | 42.9 -14% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 47.1 | 50.9 -8% | 43 9% | 48.7 -3% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 47.1 | 47.9 -2% | 48 -2% | 45 4% | 48.5 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
即使在压力测试中，表面温度也完全没有变化，因为我们只在底部的一个点测得略低于 45 °C（113 °F）的温度；其他测量点的温度仍然明显较低。在压力测试中，处理器的功率稳定在约 34 瓦（81 °C/177.8 °F），图形处理器的功率稳定在约 55 瓦（76 °C/168.8 °F）。考虑到机身较大，这个温度并不算高。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 41.1 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the class Workstation.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.1 °C / 89.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-4.3 °C / -7.8 F).
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE Ultra 7 255H, RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 Ultra 7 255H, RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop | HP ZBook X G1i 16 Ultra 7 265H, RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop | HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A R7 8845HS, RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop | Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, Radeon 890M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -10% | -8% | -2% | -37% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 39.9 | 45 -13% | 36 10% | 40.6 -2% | 50.6 -27% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 44.8 | 33 26% | 39.4 12% | 40.6 9% | 54.3 -21% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 24 | 30.6 -28% | 30.4 -27% | 26 -8% | 35.3 -47% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 25 | 31.6 -26% | 31.8 -27% | 26.6 -6% | 38.5 -54% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
立体声扬声器很难让人信服。 ThinkPad P1 16 G8优势明显。
Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP ZBook X G1i 16 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源消耗
空闲模式下的最大功耗为 12.7 瓦，考虑到显示屏分辨率较低，这一功耗相对较高。我们在压力测试中短暂测得约 140 瓦，但很快就降到约 120 瓦。因此，140 瓦的电源尺寸足够大。
| Off / Standby | 0.31 / 0.81 Watt |
| Idle | 4.8 / 12.3 / 12.7 Watt |
| Load |
89.6 / 139.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE Ultra 7 255H, RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop, Samsung PM9E1 1 TB MZVLC1T0HFLU, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 Ultra 7 255H, RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop, Samsung PM9E1 1 TB MZVLC1T0HFLU, Tandem OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | HP ZBook X G1i 16 Ultra 7 265H, RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A R7 8845HS, RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, Radeon 890M, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16" | Average NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop | Average of class Workstation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -50% | 12% | 14% | 41% | -18% | -31% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 4.8 | 15.4 -221% | 4.1 15% | 4.6 4% | 3.9 19% | 8.1 ? -69% | 8.89 ? -85% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 12.3 | 16.5 -34% | 9 27% | 10 19% | 8.3 33% | 12.6 ? -2% | 13.4 ? -9% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 12.7 | 23.1 -82% | 9.4 26% | 10.6 17% | 8.7 31% | 15.1 ? -19% | 17.6 ? -39% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 89.6 | 86.6 3% | 86.7 3% | 60.9 32% | 51.6 42% | 87.6 ? 2% | 91.7 ? -2% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 115.8 | 121.8 -5% | 102 12% | 92.8 20% | 54.6 53% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 115.1 | 123.1 -7% | 106.1 8% | 96.8 16% | 55.4 52% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 139.5 | 143.6 -3% | 152.9 -10% | 154.8 -11% | 63.7 54% | 145.3 ? -4% | 170.2 ? -22% |
* ... smaller is better
能耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
带外部监控器的能耗
电池寿命
在使用 90 瓦时电池的情况下，我们在 WLAN 测试中测得 14:11 小时（150 cd/m²）和 8:51 小时（全亮），成绩不错。
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE Ultra 7 255H, RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop, 90 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 Ultra 7 255H, RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop, 90 Wh | HP ZBook X G1i 16 Ultra 7 265H, RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop, 83 Wh | HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A R7 8845HS, RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop, 83 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, Radeon 890M, 86 Wh | Average of class Workstation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -61% | -12% | -32% | -2% | -33% | |
| WiFi Websurfing (h) | 14.2 | 5.5 -61% | 12.5 -12% | 9.7 -32% | 13.9 -2% | 8.4 ? -41% |
| WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (h) | 8.9 | 6.71 ? -25% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE
- 01/14/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 87.3%  | Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G3 21RS000DGE Intel Core Ultra 7 255H ⎘ NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,299.00 Lenovo ThinkPad P16v Gen 2 I... 2. $849.99 Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 3 Bu... 3. $1,623.55 Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 3 2... List Price: 2825€ | 2.2 kg | 19.6 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 IPS |
2. 91.6%  | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 Intel Core Ultra 7 255H ⎘ NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $4,099.00 List Price: 2000 USD | 1.9 kg | 20.6 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI Tandem OLED |
3. 87.4%  | HP ZBook X G1i 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 265H ⎘ NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $2,931.73 List Price: 2700 USD | 2.2 kg | 23 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
4. 85.4%  | HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,899.99 HP ZBook Power G11 16" Mobil... 2. $1,859.77 hp ZBook Studio 16 G11 Mobil... 3. $3,399.00 HP ZBook Power G11 16" Mobil... List Price: 2100 USD | 2.2 kg | 22.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
5. 82%  | Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 4 21RX000YGE AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $3,079.00 List Price: 2440 Euro | 2 kg | 23 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS LED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
