结论联想 ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 IAL 是学生的不错选择
如果你没有太多钱,只需要一台笔记本电脑来完成工作,无论是在微软 Office 中工作还是在学习时,联想 ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 IAL 当然非常适合这些任务。它拥有良好的输入设备和日常工作所需的所有端口--RJ45 以太网和 SD 读卡器,甚至比一些更昂贵的设备更具灵活性。此外,出色的可升级性意味着这款设备可以走得更远,而且凭借强大的 Arrow Lake H CPU,它的性能也将持续多年。
联想ThinkBook笔记本电脑的不足之处在于屏幕质量和扬声器缺乏低音等细节,但话又说回来--这并不是一款真正用于多媒体任务的笔记本电脑,在这个价位上,必须做出一些牺牲。我们测试的这款机型最大的缺点是电池续航时间低于平均水平,因为电池容量只有 45 瓦。不过,如果选择配备 60 瓦时大电池的机型,就能弥补这一不足。
Pros
Cons
物美价廉的笔记本电脑--这是联想ThinkBook 14 Gen 8的承诺。作为一款面向小型企业客户的 14 英寸笔记本电脑,这款最新一代的联想 ThinkBook 外形小巧,配备了多种功能和最新的英特尔 Arrow Lake H CPU,在市场上争得了一席之地。
规格:英特尔箭湖H首次应用于联想ThinkBook
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和连接性:经济实惠的联想 ThinkBook 笔记本电脑提供多种端口
联想 ThinkBook 14 的基本设计在过去几年中没有太大变化。它采用银灰色机身,铝制盖子和塑料底盖。在这个价位上,质量当然是一个值得关注的问题,而 ThinkBook 在很大程度上做到了坚固耐用。底座和屏幕盖几乎没有松动,但铰链有一些晃动。单手打开是不可能的,但至少屏幕可以打开到 180 度。说到材料质量,ThinkBook 给人的感觉显然与同价位的设备不相上下,至少掌托的漆面很光滑,与底盖粗糙的塑料相比,给人的廉价感稍逊一筹。
这款价格实惠的联想笔记本电脑还有一个优点:它为用户提供了很大的灵活性。ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 配备了现代的 Thunderbolt 4 端口,以及时下罕见的全尺寸 SD 卡插槽(卡伸出)和 RJ45 以太网。此外,联想ThinkBook笔记本电脑有两个SO-DIMM插槽用于扩展内存,M.2 2242固态硬盘也没有焊接--M.2 2280固态硬盘也可以安装,而且还有第二个空闲的M.2 2280插槽。Wi-Fi 卡也没有焊接,这使得 ThinkBook 非常容易维修。
SD 读卡器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG (AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG (AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
交流
网络摄像头

输入设备:良好的联想笔记本键盘
显示屏典型的廉价办公笔记本电脑屏幕
联想 ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 始终配备 14 英寸 16:10 IPS LCD,分辨率为 WUXGA(1,920 x 1,200),屏幕亮度达到 300 cd/m²,覆盖 45% 的 NTSC 色域。唯一的选择是触摸或非触摸解决方案;我们的评测样品使用的是非触摸显示屏。
屏幕亮度不达标,最高为 276 cd/m²。总的来说,这是一款廉价屏幕,可用于室内办公环境,但也缺乏色域覆盖,因此不适合任何照片编辑或色彩工作。这是一款典型的经济型办公笔记本电脑屏幕,由于屏幕背光较弱,即使是磨砂显示表面也无法在户外环境中发挥真正的作用。
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 271 cd/m²
Contrast: 934:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 6.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}
calibrated: 5.1
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
42.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
60.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
41.5% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 1.99
CCT: 6576 K
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE LEN140WUXGA, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG B140UAN02.2, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE MNE007QS3-2, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 BOE NV14N44, IPS, 2240x1400, 14", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 74% | -7% | 67% | 66% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.5 | 75.9 83% | 38.4 -7% | 70.3 69% | 69.3 67% |
sRGB Coverage | 60.3 | 99 64% | 56.7 -6% | 99.7 65% | 99.5 65% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.9 | 75.7 76% | 39.7 -7% | 72.1 68% | 71.4 66% |
Response Times | -95% | -11% | -33% | -91% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 19.3 ? | 40.7 ? -111% | 24.1 ? -25% | 32.7 ? -69% | 41 ? -112% |
Response Time Black / White * | 15.8 ? | 28.2 ? -78% | 15.4 ? 3% | 15.2 ? 4% | 26.8 ? -70% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | 41% | -18% | 48% | 33% | |
Brightness middle | 271 | 437 61% | 346 28% | 418 54% | 403.2 49% |
Brightness | 276 | 426 54% | 343 24% | 408 48% | 388 41% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 83 -7% | 91 2% | 90 1% | 93 4% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.23 21% | 0.32 -10% | 0.3 -3% | 0.27 7% |
Contrast | 934 | 1900 103% | 1081 16% | 1393 49% | 1493 60% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.4 | 3.9 39% | 8.8 -38% | 1.6 75% | 4.15 35% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.7 | 6.6 68% | 23.1 -12% | 2.5 88% | 6.92 67% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.1 | 1.9 63% | 5.8 -14% | 1.1 78% | 1.04 80% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 4.7 -31% | 9.2 -156% | 2 44% | 5.1 -42% |
Gamma | 1.99 111% | 2.38 92% | 2.16 102% | 2.14 103% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6576 99% | 7444 87% | 5979 109% | 6851 95% | 6677 97% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
29% | -12% /
-14% | 27% /
41% | 3% /
23% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
15.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.7 ms rise | |
↘ 7.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
19.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise | |
↘ 10.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8327 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能英特尔箭湖 H 提供
联想的 ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 IAL 可配置四种不同的 Arrow Lake CPU,其中两种是 Arrow Lake U 处理器(英特尔酷睿 Ultra 5 225H、英特尔酷睿 Ultra 5 225H、英特尔酷睿 Ultra 5 225H)。英特尔酷睿5 225H, 酷睿至尊 5 225U, 酷睿至尊 5 235U, 酷睿至尊 7 255H).根据所选处理器的不同,有三种不同的英特尔图形处理器可供选择 (英特尔图形, 英特尔 ARC 130T, 英特尔 ARC 140T).
联想笔记本电脑有两个 SO-DIMM 和两个 M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 4.0 插槽。最高可支持 64 GB DDR5-5600 内存和 4 TB SSD 存储。
测试条件
有三种不同的功率模式影响功率限制(PL1 = 持续负载下的功耗,PL2 = 最大功耗),可通过 FN+Q 组合键进行更改:
- 最佳电池寿命:PL1 11 W / PL2 20 W
- 平衡:PL1 30 W / PL2 45 W
- 最佳性能:38 瓦 / 50 瓦
所有基准测试均在 "最佳性能 "模式下进行。
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 255H是英特尔最新 CPU 系列 Arrow Lake 的一部分。这款处理器共有十六个内核--六个 Lion Cove P 内核(2 至 5.1 GHz)、八个 Skymont E 内核(1.5 至 4.4 GHz)和两个额外的 Skymont 低能耗 E 内核(0.7 至 2.5 GHz)。这款处理器的额定 TDP 通常为 28 W,但制造商可将其设置为高达 115 W。 比较列表.
在我们的 CPU 性能评级中,ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 在已评测的 14 英寸办公笔记本电脑中名列前茅。与 联想 ThinkPad E14 6 代相比,配备 AMD Ryzen 7735HS 的联想 ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 的 CPU 性能明显提高了 47%。与配备 Core Ultra 7 155H 的两款设备相比,更新的处理器速度提高了 16% 至 23%。
在电池供电情况下,性能略有下降,约为 10%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (16435 - 22578, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (2047 - 2152, n=10) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2165, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (6414 - 8860, n=9) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (786 - 826, n=9) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 826, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (2414 - 3444, n=9) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (258 - 322, n=9) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 322, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (157 - 251, n=9) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (47514 - 68627, n=10) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11668 - 77867, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (4589 - 6385, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6442, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (11979 - 17489, n=10) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 17489, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (2858 - 2925, n=10) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3820, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (11348 - 17218, n=9) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 17218, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (1980 - 2121, n=9) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (726 - 2350, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (16.2 - 25.8, n=9) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (41.3 - 61.6, n=9) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.403 - 1.456, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (0.4233 - 0.515, n=9) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (14508 - 24741, n=8) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (72225 - 118886, n=8) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=70, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (3445 - 5548, n=8) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 115682, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (59810 - 68308, n=8) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (6846 - 8931, n=8) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=70, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (37743 - 63347, n=8) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=70, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (58402 - 83398, n=8) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (822 - 1316, n=8) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (7685 - 13231, n=8) | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (23836 - 65787, n=8) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 64588, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
系统性能
在系统性能方面,无论是基准测试结果还是日常性能,我们都毫无怨言。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE -1! | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG -1! |
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (7273 - 7865, n=6) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (10651 - 11556, n=6) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9363 - 11406, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (9144 - 9716, n=6) | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 10623, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (10721 - 12456, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 12442, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1665 - 2018, n=7) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2038, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1566 - 1880, n=7) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1918, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1880 - 2396, n=7) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2396, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1367 - 1723, n=7) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1889, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (302 - 327, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 482, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (291 - 317, n=7) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 348, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (265 - 1104, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (427 - 455, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7683 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (39188 - 108302, n=8) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 109035, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (43703 - 90552, n=8) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 127174, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (36438 - 82641, n=8) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (110.1 - 147.2, n=8) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6.8 - 187.8, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
联想使用的是 Western Digitial 生产的快速 NVMe PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘。它是一个 M.2 2280 插槽内的 M.2 2242 硬盘--还有第二个 M.2 2280 插槽,因此 ThinkBook 的升级能力很强。在我们的基准测试中,出厂的固态硬盘速度也很快,在基准对比中名列前茅。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
英特尔 ARC 140T 是 Arrow Lake H Ultra 7 CPU 的标准 GPU 解决方案。从技术上讲,它与去年流星湖 H CPU 的英特尔 ARC GPU 几乎完全相同,只是人工智能性能有所提高。因此,ThinkBook 与老款 Meteor Lake 笔记本电脑相比,取得类似的性能也就不足为奇了。这意味着,ThinkBook 当然可以用于一些对图形要求较高的任务,如轻度游戏,不过较新的游戏只能在图形保真度大幅降低的情况下进行。
3DMark 11 Performance | 13813 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8186 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4041 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8.48 - 31.4, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 70.7, n=67, last 2 years) |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 168.9 | 153.9 | 39.7 | 16.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 104.1 | 89.6 | 83.5 | 75.5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 72.3 | 40.8 | 25.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 53.3 | 44.4 | 38.5 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 36.9 | 28.8 | 24.8 | 24.4 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 35.9 | 22.8 | ||
F1 24 (2024) | 76.5 | 70.3 | 54.2 | 17.8 |
排放:尽管处理器功能强大,ThinkBook 的运行温度并不高
系统噪音
ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 的单风扇在笔记本空闲时完全关闭。如果选择 "平衡 "电源配置文件,风扇的噪音为 32.9 dB(a),相当安静。只有将机器设置为 "最高性能 "时,噪音才会超过 40 dB(a)。
我们没有检测到这款联想笔记本电脑的线圈啸叫。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.2 / 25.2 / 25.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.9 / 43.9 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE Arc 140T, Ultra 7 255H, Western Digital PCSN5000S SDEPMSJ-1T00-1101 | Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG Radeon 740M, R5 8540U, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X110N | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE Radeon 680M, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | 13% | 1% | -5% | |
off / environment * | 25.2 | 24.9 1% | 23.5 7% | 23.8 6% | 23.6 6% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.2 | 24.9 1% | 23.5 7% | 23.8 6% | 23.7 6% |
Idle Average * | 25.2 | 24.9 1% | 23.5 7% | 23.8 6% | 23.7 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.2 | 28 -11% | 23.5 7% | 27.1 -8% | 27 -7% |
Load Average * | 32.9 | 35.7 -9% | 24.5 26% | 34.9 -6% | 41.8 -27% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 44.1 | 41.8 5% | 37.6 15% | 43.7 1% | |
Load Maximum * | 43.9 | 41.6 5% | 34.5 21% | 43.7 -0% | 50.7 -15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 45.7 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.8 °C / 83.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-0.6 °C / -1 F).
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T | Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG AMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740M | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 14% | 0% | 5% | 16% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44.1 | 37.5 15% | 43.4 2% | 43.7 1% | 39.2 11% |
Maximum Bottom * | 44.6 | 41.1 8% | 47.1 -6% | 49.4 -11% | 41 8% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31.6 | 27 15% | 31.5 -0% | 27.7 12% | 25.4 20% |
Idle Bottom * | 35.4 | 29.3 17% | 33.7 5% | 28.6 19% | 26.8 24% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
联想使用的扬声器声音很大,但缺乏低音效果。这使得 ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 IAL 非常适合在办公室使用,但不太适合听音乐。
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理:小电池限制了电池续航时间
耗电量
ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 IAL 在空闲时的能效表现不错。总体而言,它比我们对比的其他设备更省电,尤其是在负载情况下与 Meteor Lake H 机型相比。
对于 66.7 W 的最大功耗来说,65 W 的 USB-C 充电器似乎不够用,但由于功耗很快就会下降,用户不必担心使用过程中电池会放电。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T, Western Digital PCSN5000S SDEPMSJ-1T00-1101, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG R5 8540U, Radeon 740M, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X110N, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, YMTC PC300-1TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Average Intel Arc Graphics 140T | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 14% | 1% | -20% | -12% | -18% | 7% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 5.9 -44% | 5.9 -44% | 4.4 -7% | 3.5 15% | 5.69 ? -39% | 4.17 ? -2% |
Idle Average * | 7.8 | 7.8 -0% | 8.8 -13% | 9.2 -18% | 7.9 -1% | 9.04 ? -16% | 7.26 ? 7% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.7 | 8.2 23% | 11.8 -10% | 9.6 10% | 8.8 18% | 11.7 ? -9% | 8.88 ? 17% |
Load Average * | 53.1 | 36.3 32% | 37.8 29% | 62.6 -18% | 66.4 -25% | 55.8 ? -5% | 45.1 ? 15% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 56.9 | 39.1 31% | 49.3 13% | 71.5 -26% | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 56.7 | 39 31% | 42.6 25% | 71.9 -27% | |||
Load Maximum * | 65.7 | 48.9 26% | 59.7 9% | 101.7 -55% | 110.3 -68% | 78.5 ? -19% | 68.5 ? -4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 55.7 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T, 45 Wh | Acer TravelMate P4 14 TMP414-42-TCO-R6KG R5 8540U, Radeon 740M, 53 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M, 57 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 80 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7440 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 64 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 82% | 30% | 107% | 68% | 111% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 435 | 590 36% | 552 27% | 888 104% | 749 72% | 778 ? 79% |
Load | 48 | 109 127% | 64 33% | 101 110% | 78 63% | 116.2 ? 142% |
笔记本检查评级
联想的 ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 IAL 具有良好的性能、可升级性和丰富的端口选择,但显示屏价格低廉,扬声器不足,这些都是经济型办公笔记本电脑的典型问题。另外,电池续航时间有限,但可以通过选择配备更大电池的配置来改善。
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE
- 07/27/2025 v8
Benjamin Herzig
潜在竞争对手比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.