结论——价格合理，是款出色的主流产品
与去年的 Dell 16 Plus 相比，Dell 16S 采用了更坚固、更成熟的机身设计，同时在端口配置和可维护性方面也未作妥协。 CPU和显示屏选项也得到了提升，新增了120 Hz OLED显示屏，最引人注目的是搭载了Core Ultra X7处理器，其图形性能与最新款XPS 16持平。仅凭更新后的设计，这款新机型就比去年的机型更值得考虑。
虽然戴尔 16S 的起售价相当合理，但值得注意的是，其价格很容易飙升至 2000 美元以上，这使得在某些配置级别下，该机型更难被推荐。 例如，Core Ultra 7 355 配置的起售价为 1310 美元，而仅仅将 CPU 升级至 Core Ultra X7 358H，价格就会大幅上涨至 2120 美元。 即使在内存、存储空间和IPS显示屏规格相同的情况下，配置搭载相同CPU的XPS 16，价格也仅略高一些，为2350美元。 因此，渴望获得更快的 Core Ultra X7 的用户，不妨多花一点钱，选择体验更佳的 XPS 16；而戴尔 16S 在中端 Core Ultra 7 配置级别上则更容易被用户接受。
Pros
+ 屏幕可完全展开至180度
+ 丰富的接口选择
+ Core Ultra X7 配置选项
+ 坚固的机身
Cons
- 尽管机身尺寸较大，但仅支持一块内部M.2固态硬盘
- 即使配备OLED屏幕，对HDR的支持也有限
- 内存不可由用户自行升级
- 没有网络摄像头遮光板
正如14英寸的戴尔14S接替了旧款戴尔14 Plus一样，主流的16英寸戴尔16S也是去年戴尔16 Plus的继任者。 新机型带来了多项更新，特别是在机身设计方面，同时将处理器选项从英特尔Lunar Lake升级为Panther Lake和AMD Zen 5。
我们测试的机型属于中端配置，搭载英特尔酷睿Ultra 7 355处理器和1800p OLED触控屏，售价约为1700美元。其他型号可能配备更强大的酷睿Ultra X7 358H处理器，或采用分辨率较低的IPS显示屏。
其竞争对手包括其他中端 16 英寸多媒体翻盖式笔记本，例如联想 Ideapad Slim 5、惠普 OmniBook 5 系列或华硕 VivoBook S16 系列。
更多戴尔评测：
规格
Dell 16S DS16260
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 355 8c/8t, 4 x 4.7 GHz Intel Cougar Cove P-Core, 4 x 3.5 GHz Intel Darkmont LP E-Core, 58 W PL2 / Short Burst, 36 W PL1 / Sustained, Panther Lake
Graphics adapter
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, Core: 2500 MHz, LPDDR5x, 32.101.8736
Memory
16 GB
, LPDDR5x-7467, Dual-Channel, Soldered
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel, 10-point capacitive, Samsung 160HR11, OLED, Dell P/N: C1296, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Panther Lake-H PCH
Storage
SanDisk PC SN5100S, 1024 GB
Weight
1.802 kg, Power Supply: 327 g
Price
1700 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
案例
连接性
沟通
| Networking | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
Dell 16S DS16260; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1450 (1117-1561) MBit/s
Dell 16S DS16260; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1579 (1087-1681) MBit/s
网络摄像头
6.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
15 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
维护
可持续发展
戴尔 14S 和 16S 因具备相似的物理特征和设计，因此采用了相似的再生材料。其包装不含塑料且可完全回收，而交流适配器则使用了高达 98% 的再生铝和塑料。
输入设备
显示
提供四种显示选项：
- 1920 x 1200，60 Hz，IPS，雾面屏，400 nits，约60% sRGB，非触控
- 1920 x 1200，60 Hz，IPS，镜面屏，400 尼特，约 60% sRGB，触摸屏
- 2560 x 1600，120 Hz，IPS，哑光屏，500 尼特，100% sRGB，非触控
- 2880 x 1800，120 Hz，OLED，镜面屏，400 尼特，100% DCI-P3，触控屏
()()()
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Samsung 160HR11 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 373 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 370.8 cd/m² Minimum: 22.6 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 368.4 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}
95% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
CCT: 6126 K
| Dell 16S DS16260 Samsung 160HR11, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Dell 16 Plus AU Optronics B160QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 LG Philips 160WUX, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R Lenovo LEN160WUM, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Asus V16 V3607V MNG007QX2-2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 144 Hz | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng CMN1640, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -13% | -22% | -53% | -52% | -50% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.6 | 76.6 -23% | 66.2 -34% | 39.7 -60% | 40.9 -59% | 41.6 -58% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 99.8 0% | 97.4 -3% | 57.7 -42% | 59.7 -40% | 62.4 -38% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 95 | 78.4 -17% | 67.7 -29% | 41 -57% | 42.2 -56% | 43 -55% |
| Response Times | -4223% | -4968% | -4121% | -2905% | -3886% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.54 ? | 32.8 ? -5974% | 39.3 ? -7178% | 32.7 ? -5956% | 22.9 ? -4141% | 30.7 ? -5585% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.91 ? | 23.4 ? -2471% | 26 ? -2757% | 21.7 ? -2285% | 16.1 ? -1669% | 20.8 ? -2186% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 957.41 ? | |||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 32 | |||||
| Screen | -114% | -14% | -240% | -172% | -143% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 368.4 | 335.6 -9% | 534.6 45% | 347.7 -6% | 313.3 -15% | 324 -12% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 371 | 308 -17% | 515 39% | 331 -11% | 298 -20% | 295 -20% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 99 | 88 -11% | 92 -7% | 84 -15% | 88 -11% | 88 -11% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.48 | 0.5 | 0.2 | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 4.15 -177% | 2.53 -69% | 8.11 -441% | 6.09 -306% | 5.13 -242% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.82 | 9.8 -248% | 4.57 -62% | 22.25 -689% | 19.31 -585% | 16.11 -471% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 6.7 -219% | 2.7 -29% | 7.9 -276% | 4.1 -95% | 4.24 -102% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.25 98% | 2.32 95% | 2.16 102% | 2.18 101% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 6126 106% | 6260 104% | 6860 95% | 6039 108% | 6031 108% | 7318 89% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1525 | 2056 | 724 | 627 | 1620 | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.44 | 1.26 | 3.28 | 2.63 | 2.99 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1450% /
-833% | -1668% /
-917% | -1471% /
-894% | -1043% /
-636% | -1360% /
-798% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.91 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.49 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.42 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.27 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.27 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 957.41 Hz Amplitude: 32 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 957.41 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 957.41 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将 Windows 设置为“性能”模式。
处理器性能
Cinebench R15 多核循环测试
Dell 16S DS16260 Intel Core Ultra 7 355: Ø1516 (1397.53-1683.22) Points
Dell 16 Plus Intel Core Ultra 7 256V: Ø1237 (1194.6-1538.58) Points
Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 Intel Core Ultra 5 325: Ø1533 (1510.86-1648.8) Points
Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R Intel Core 5 210H: Ø1591 (1550.99-1756.62) Points
Asus V16 V3607V Intel Core 7 240H: Ø2157 (2014-2317.63) Points
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng AMD Ryzen 5 8540U: Ø1511 (1423.89-1594.39) Points
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (10966 - 11504, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (1931 - 1984, n=5) | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (4282 - 4381, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (730 - 749, n=5) | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (1654 - 1707, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (288 - 292, n=5) | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (299 - 310, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (5734 - 5831, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (11036 - 11702, n=5) | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (2701 - 2769, n=5) | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (10000 - 10284, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (1999 - 2034, n=5) | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (14.2 - 14.8, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (40.8 - 47.3, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (0.4258 - 0.4438, n=5) | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng -1! | |
| Asus V16 V3607V -1! | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R -1! | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 -1! | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 -1! | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Dell 16 Plus -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus V16 V3607V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (12088 - 12838, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell 16 Plus (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus V16 V3607V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (60741 - 65963, n=5) | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell 16 Plus (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (2763 - 2845, n=5) | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus V16 V3607V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell 16 Plus (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus V16 V3607V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell 16 Plus (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus V16 V3607V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (4585 - 4601, n=5) | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell 16 Plus (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus V16 V3607V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (32404 - 35293, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell 16 Plus (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus V16 V3607V (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (38981 - 39424, n=5) | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell 16 Plus (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus V16 V3607V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (635 - 646, n=5) | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell 16 Plus (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus V16 V3607V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (6138 - 6833, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell 16 Plus (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (57998 - 60440, n=5) | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell 16 Plus (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus V16 V3607V (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (2747 - 2813, n=5) | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 (v8.20.8100) | |
系统性能
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Asus V16 V3607V -1! | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng -4! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (7884 - 8201, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (10356 - 10820, n=5) | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (13871 - 14955, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (9258 - 9368, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1627 - 1892, n=5) | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1561 - 1826, n=5) | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1761 - 2052, n=5) | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1458 - 1671, n=5) | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (300 - 303, n=5) | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (279 - 284, n=5) | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (470 - 487, n=5) | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8201 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (97301 - 105135, n=5) | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (79551 - 85807, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (103056 - 108621, n=5) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (99.7 - 105.8, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
SanDisk PC SN5100S
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6893 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
6387 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
702.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
445.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
3544 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
3589 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
78.56 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
147.6 MB/s
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
Dell 16S DS16260 SanDisk PC SN5100S; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6965 (5431.41-7031.95) MB/s
Dell 16 Plus Samsung BM9C1 1024GB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3649 (2169.29-4860.43) MB/s
GPU性能
| 功耗概况 | Fire Strike 图形性能得分 | 物理性能得分 | 综合评分 |
| 性能模式 | 7030 | 21908 | 2186 |
| 电池电量 | 6575 (-6%) | 18030 (-18%) | 2138（-2%） |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 8225 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 29980 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6278 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3113 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell 16 Plus -1! | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Strange Brigade | Baldur's Gate 3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | F1 24
| GTA V | |
| 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (46.6 - 58.2, n=13) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
| 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Asus V16 V3607V | |
| MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (18 - 23.8, n=13) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R | |
《赛博朋克2077》极致画质帧率图表
Dell 16S DS16260 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL: Ø17.7 (16.9-18) fps
Dell 16 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V: Ø21.9 (20.6-23.6) fps
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 170.4 | 157.2 | 51.4 | 21.1 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 110.2 | 88.5 | 89.7 | 84.3 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 67.5 | 36.8 | 25.8 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 37.3 | 28.9 | 27.6 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 173.9 | 71.8 | 56.8 | 47.2 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 31.4 | 26.1 | 21.9 | 21.6 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 36.8 | 26.3 | 22.1 | 17.7 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 60.4 | 61.3 | 42.2 | 14.1 |
排放
系统噪音
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23.2 / 23.2 / 23.2 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 26.8 / 45.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.1 dB(A) | ||
| Dell 16S DS16260 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Dell 16 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R Core 5 210H, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | Asus V16 V3607V Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | -2% | -1% | -14% | -6% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.1 | 23.4 -1% | 22.8 1% | 22.7 2% | 23.3 -1% | 24 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.2 | 23.5 -1% | 22.9 1% | 22.7 2% | 23.5 -1% | 24 -3% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 23.2 | 23.5 -1% | 22.9 1% | 22.7 2% | 23.7 -2% | 25 -8% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 23.2 | 23.5 -1% | 23.9 -3% | 22.7 2% | 23.7 -2% | 26 -12% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 26.8 | 31.9 -19% | 34.8 -30% | 31.8 -19% | 48 -79% | 38 -42% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 40.9 | 42.6 -4% | 38 7% | 34 17% | 40.5 1% | 37 10% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 45.9 | 46.9 -2% | 43.3 6% | 50.4 -10% | 51 -11% | 39 15% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+1.5 °C / 2.7 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+1.5 °C / 2.7 F).
| Dell 16S DS16260 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Dell 16 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R Core 5 210H, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | Asus V16 V3607V Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -7% | 1% | 4% | -4% | -7% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 40.4 | 40.6 -0% | 43.8 -8% | 36 11% | 41.2 -2% | 42 -4% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 39.2 | 40 -2% | 42 -7% | 33.8 14% | 34.4 12% | 44 -12% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 25.8 | 29.2 -13% | 23.2 10% | 27.4 -6% | 28.8 -12% | 26 -1% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 25.8 | 28.6 -11% | 23.6 9% | 27.2 -5% | 29 -12% | 28 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
| 平均 CPU 时钟频率 (GHz) | GPU 时钟频率 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) 系统空闲 | |
| -- | |||
| -- | |||
| 42 | |||
| Prime95 压力测试 | |||
| 3.2 | |||
| -- | |||
| 86 | |||
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力测试 | |||
| 1.3 | |||
| 2050 | |||
| 74 | |||
| 《赛博朋克2077》压力测试 | |||
| 1.1 | |||
| 2500 | |||
| 72 |
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell 16S DS16260 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功耗
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.16 / 0.6 Watt |
| Idle | 3.8 / 4.6 / 12.3 Watt |
| Load |
33 / 70.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell 16S DS16260 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, SanDisk PC SN5100S, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Dell 16 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, Samsung BM9C1 1024GB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R Core 5 210H, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, , IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Asus V16 V3607V Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 3% | 16% | -52% | -67% | 11% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 3.8 | 3.4 11% | 1.3 66% | 8.1 -113% | 2.1 45% | 4 -5% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 4.6 | 6.9 -50% | 4.5 2% | 11.9 -159% | 7.2 -57% | 5 -9% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 12.3 | 7.4 40% | 4.6 63% | 12.4 -1% | 10.7 13% | 6 51% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 33 | 41.7 -26% | 36.5 -11% | 55.7 -69% | 99.4 -201% | 40 -21% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 48.2 | 38 21% | 45.4 6% | 52.6 -9% | 88.7 -84% | 39.1 19% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 48 | 41.4 14% | 47.9 -0% | 55.7 -16% | 92.1 -92% | 43 10% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 70.7 | 62 12% | 82.8 -17% | 67.8 4% | 137.8 -95% | 46 35% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克 / 压力测试
Dell 16S DS16260 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø61.2 (57.5-70.7) Watt
Dell 16 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø42.9 (38.2-62.6) Watt
Dell 16S DS16260 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4 (3.85-4.45) Watt
Dell 16 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.39 (4.83-8.36) Watt
Dell 16S DS16260 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø48 (46.5-54) Watt
Dell 16 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø41.4 (38.6-51.4) Watt
外接显示器的功耗
Dell 16S DS16260 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø55.9 (52.3-70.8) Watt
Dell 16 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø39.1 (34.2-58.7) Watt
Dell 16S DS16260 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø65.4 (60.2-70.6) Watt
Dell 16 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø51.2 (34.4-58.1) Watt
Dell 16S DS16260 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø58.2 (51.2-70.1) Watt
Dell 16S DS16260 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø48.8 (45.6-59.8) Watt
Dell 16 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø40.2 (31.8-46.3) Watt
Dell 16S DS16260 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.86 (3.63-4.64) Watt
Dell 16 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.83 (3.37-5.43) Watt
Dell 16S DS16260 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø48.2 (46.7-66.3) Watt
Dell 16 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø38 (36.2-41.1) Watt
电池续航时间
| Dell 16S DS16260 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 70 Wh | Dell 16 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 64 Wh | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 70 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R Core 5 210H, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 60 Wh | Asus V16 V3607V Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 63 Wh | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M, 59 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | ||||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 11 | 14.1 28% | 26.6 142% | 11.3 3% | 9 -18% | 11.4 4% |
Notebookcheck 评分
戴尔 16S 比其前代机型戴尔 16 Plus 更坚固，外观也更吸引人。不过，更高配置版本的价格几乎与 XPS 16 持平。
Dell 16S DS16260
- 08/17/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
Multimedia - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 82%  | Dell 16S DS16260 Intel Core Ultra 7 355 ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1700 USD | 1.8 kg | 15.3 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 OLED |
2. 81.8%  | Dell 16 Plus Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1150 USD | 1.8 kg | 16.99 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
3. 84.2%  | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 Intel Core Ultra 5 325 ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,999.00 Dell Premium 16 (XPS 16 2025... 2. $2,899.99 Dell Premium 16 (XPS 16 2025... 3. $1,977.99 Dell Premium 16 (Previously ... List Price: 1600 USD | 1.7 kg | 15.4 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
4. 79.9%  | Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R Intel Core 5 210H ⎘ Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 850 USD | 1.9 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
5. 78.5%  | Asus V16 V3607V Intel Core 7 240H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $49.99 180W 150W 20V 9A Charger for... 2. $125.98 KrystalPix Replacement LCD f... 3. $125.98 KrystalPix Replacement LCD f... List Price: 900 USD | 2 kg | 22 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
6. 77.3%  | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng AMD Ryzen 5 8540U ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 730 EUR | 1.7 kg | 18.6 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
