微星Katana 15笔记本电脑回顾:拥有RTX 4050和Alder Lake CPU的预算游戏机
微星公司有一系列笔记本电脑,在视觉上看起来非常相似。去年,我们审查了15.6英寸的准前辈,即微星Katana GF66 12UGS,但 脉冲GL66或MSI Sword也有相同的视觉效果。我们目前的审查配置是有趣的,因为微星已经决定将一个 "老 "桤木湖处理器与一个新的 RTX 4050以便可能成为第一批发布带有RTX 40xx卡的游戏笔记本电脑。名称是Katana 15 B12,而Katana 15 B13已经有一个英特尔Gen13和一个RTX 40xx。我们将看看这两代CPU/GPU在我们的B12模型中如何比较。
由于Katana 15是首批接受审查的带有RTX 4050的笔记本电脑之一,我们在很大程度上回落到上一代的入门级到中端玩家的RTX 3060进行比较。这些产品包括 联想Legion 5,以及 申克XMG核心15, 微星 MSI Pulse GL66和 华硕TUF Gaming F15。前者也被包括在内进行比较,但读者应该注意,它配备了更强大的 RTX 3070 Ti.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.9 % | 03/2023 | MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
80.3 % | 06/2022 | MSI Katana GF66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 27.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
80.7 % | 04/2022 | MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.5 % | 11/2022 | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 19.99 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.2 % | 03/2022 | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 24.95 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.9 % | 01/2023 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 23 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
箱子 - 塑料卡塔纳
Katana 15的外壳完全由塑料制成,即使显示屏盖子和底座的光滑表面材料看起来几乎像金属。侧面现在显示出黑色和灰色的图案。不幸的是,事实证明,这个箱子也非常容易沾染指纹。
开启角度为180度。在标志旁边,一些线条和模切装饰着盖子的黑色闪亮表面。打开或调整角度后,显示屏晃动的时间比平时长。
底部是由较软的塑料制成。底部相对抗扭,但会发出一些破裂的声音。相反,盖子更容易弯曲,并发出吱吱的声音。显示屏的边缘在侧面很窄,但按照今天的标准,顶部和底部相当宽。
装备--上一代产品
三个微星型号的端口安排都是一样的。事实上,三个USB-A端口中的一个仍然是2.0型,这并不真正属于当前的时代。这同样适用于一个USB-C插槽,它不支持Thunderbolt,只提供3.0速度。
缺少一个SD读卡器,但至少LAN和HDMI都在机上。耳机插孔不寻常地位于右侧,就像HDMI端口一样,这两个端口可能会干扰鼠标的使用。尽管有足够的空间,但背面却没有端口。
沟通
微星安装了英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX201无线局域网模块,它还不支持Wi-Fi 6E,所以目前无法连接到6GHz网络。但它确实在5GHz范围内运行(当然还有2.4GHz),这还是相当快的。
网络摄像头
网络摄像头也是上一代产品,其分辨率为720p。即使是较新的B13也有一个720p的摄像头。这可以通过fn+F6打开或关闭。
色彩偏差通常相当高,而且图像质量相当次优。
安全问题
板上有TPM,否则缺少一个Kensington插槽。也没有指纹传感器。
配件和保修
价格低廉的笔记本电脑通常不附带任何额外的东西。Katana 15的情况也是如此。
微星公司提供24个月的保修期,并包括提货和退货服务。
维护
不幸的是,微星使用密封贴纸来确定用户是否已经自己打开过设备。由于我们的测试模型来自数码港,所以我们避免打开它,以免损坏我们借出的设备。
根据微星公司的说法,设备的所有者也可以为维护目的打开设备。只要这是 "专业 "的,设备的保修就不会受到影响。
输入设备 - 体面的键盘,小型触摸板
键盘
所有Katana型号的布局都非常相似:它看起来非常整洁,但右侧的数字键盘看起来被严重挤压,但至少有一个。
中间的方向键并没有像通常情况下那样高度减半,而是在长度和高度上都有些小。WASD键是透明的,因此在颜色上很突出。F键和特别键也非常小。
不幸的是,微星公司又把fn键移到了空格键的右边,这需要一些时间来适应。很奇怪,为什么微星继续走自己的路。如果有必要,你可以将fn键和Windows键的功能对调,但这样一来,你就会遇到同样的问题,Windows键在右边而不是fn键。
按键行程相当短,但反馈很明显,所以打字感觉相当快。击键噪音适中,底座保持稳定,打字时不会弯曲。
键盘背光提供四个区域,每个区域有四个级别的亮度可调。
触摸板
Katana 15拥有感觉上是市场上最小的触摸板之一。它看起来有点复古。当然,无论如何,游戏玩家通常会连接一个鼠标,但更大的触摸板只是在旅途中使用时更加舒适。
触摸板就在空格键下面,因此在布局上非常靠左。如果能把它放在稍稍中心的位置会更有优势。
集成键的点击声有些大,而且看起来质量不是很高,但它们的反应可靠而准确。
显示器 - 250尼特和57%sRGB是预算值
微星继续为Katana使用全高清显示屏,而许多竞争对手已经使用QHD和更高的分辨率。这不一定是个问题,因为分辨率和144赫兹应该很适合与RTX 4050一起使用。到目前为止,B13似乎也没有任何替代性的显示屏选择。归根结底,它与Katana GF66 和Pulse GL66 中的面板相同。
不幸的是,258尼特的平均亮度相当低于现在的平均水平,因为大多数竞争对手的笔记本电脑都提供更亮的显示屏。至少92%的照度是相当均匀的,而且亮度向右下方有所下降。
对于一个游戏玩家来说,响应时间相当不理想,甚至是平庸的。至少在我们的模型中,PWM不是一个问题。屏幕出血只是轻微的,在大多数情况下并不明显。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 257 cd/m²
Contrast: 1374:1 (Black: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.57 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.63
ΔE Greyscale 3.19 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
39.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK AUOAF90 (B156HAN08.4), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI Katana GF66 12UGS AU Optronics AUOAF90, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK AU Optronics B156HAN08.4 (AUOAF90), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB CSOT MNF601CA1-3, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM TL156VDXP0101, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) CSOT MNF601CA1-1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 3% | 3% | 78% | 73% | 78% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 38.1 | 39.1 3% | 39 2% | 69.1 81% | 66.4 74% | 68.8 81% |
sRGB Coverage | 56.8 | 58.3 3% | 58.4 3% | 99.5 75% | 97 71% | 99.3 75% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.3 | 40.4 3% | 40.3 3% | 70 78% | 68.5 74% | 69.9 78% |
Response Times | -5% | -2% | 59% | 69% | 66% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38.8 ? | 40 ? -3% | 38.8 ? -0% | 14.8 ? 62% | 5.6 ? 86% | 16 ? 59% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26.8 ? | 28.4 ? -6% | 28 ? -4% | 12 ? 55% | 12.8 ? 52% | 7.6 ? 72% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 1% | 29% | 1% | 26% | 15% | |
Brightness middle | 261 | 227 -13% | 248 -5% | 363.5 39% | 353.7 36% | 378 45% |
Brightness | 258 | 225 -13% | 245 -5% | 350 36% | 340 32% | 371 44% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 90 -2% | 86 -7% | 89 -3% | 89 -3% | 93 1% |
Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.21 -11% | 0.13 32% | 0.39 -105% | 0.34 -79% | 0.33 -74% |
Contrast | 1374 | 1081 -21% | 1908 39% | 932 -32% | 1040 -24% | 1145 -17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.57 | 4.19 25% | 3.14 44% | 3.68 34% | 1.74 69% | 2.84 49% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.6 | 17.45 15% | 5.82 72% | 8.92 57% | 3.63 82% | 5.51 73% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.63 | 3.81 18% | 3.14 32% | 0.53 89% | 0.5 89% | 2.75 41% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.19 | 2.7 15% | 1.2 62% | 6.5 -104% | 2.1 34% | 4.08 -28% |
Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.208 100% | 2.49 88% | 2.2 100% | 2.3 96% | 2.4 92% |
CCT | 6146 106% | 6176 105% | 6468 100% | 5995 108% | 6257 104% | 5841 111% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -0% /
1% | 10% /
19% | 46% /
26% | 56% /
42% | 53% /
36% |
* ... smaller is better
制造商没有提供任何有关色彩空间覆盖的信息。我们测得sRGB的覆盖率略低于57%,AdobeRGB和DisplayP3的覆盖率约为39%。在这里,Katana 15的预算特点也很明显;竞争对手提供了更高的色彩空间覆盖率。
显示器在出厂前并没有调整得那么好。我们在这里只根据sRGB标准进行测量。降低亮度只是稍微降低了灰度等级的DeltaE值,但它仍然保持在3以下。然而,Calman ColorChecker显示出很高的色彩偏差。
手动校准将灰度偏差降至0.61,但ColorChecker的DeltaE值为4.63,仍然太高。显示器似乎没有能力做得更多。我们校准过的icc色彩配置文件可以在上面下载。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.2 ms rise | |
↘ 12.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.6 ms rise | |
↘ 20.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
哑光的表面可以过滤掉户外的强烈反射。然而,该面板的亮度较弱,肯定需要在阴凉处放置。
视角的稳定性还可以。亮度的下降只有在极端的视角下才能看到。
性能 - Katana 15处于RTX 3060的水平
微星Katana 15被宣传为一款游戏笔记本电脑,虽然它的酷睿i7-12650H属于去年的桤木湖系列,但它绝对是低端的一部分。
该CPU是与Nvidia RTX 4050这是新的RTX 40xx型号中的入门级卡。在Katana中,它的功耗高达105瓦。16GB内存是如今游戏玩家的(低)标准。
测试条件
微星中心是控制中心,当然,制造商用它来收集各种数据。在其他方面,性能设置在这里被调整。这里默认预设了AI模式,它根据应用的负载自动调整性能值。我们对人工智能的能力充满信心,在这种模式下运行所有的基准测试。
除了性能之外,其他设置也可以在MSI中心进行调整。例如,你可以调换fn键和Windows键的功能,在极限性能模式下手动调整风扇曲线,或者切换iGPU和dGPU。该工具在某些分辨率下有问题。
大多数时候,在MSI中心激活了GPU混合模式,它可以自动在iGPU和dGPU之间切换。然而,这在我们的基准测试中并没有可靠地工作。例如,我们不得不手动激活Blender的dGPU,因为测试自动只运行iGPU,产生的结果非常差。
处理器
在Cinebench循环中,我们观察到在前两次运行中性能有小幅下降。之后,性能基本保持不变,但总体上不是太高。我们的Katana与拥有i7-12700H的竞争对手相比处于劣势,它也被Ryzen 7 6800H击败。
TDP在KI和Extreme模式下几乎保持不变:我们在运行开始和结束时分别测量了约105W,在运行过程中功耗下降到60W。在电池模式下,峰值只有53W,否则只有19W。
总的来说,CPU性能达到了预期水平,但Katana的单核性能稍弱一些。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=230, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (5362 - 15537, n=14) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (1428 - 1808, n=14) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (2106 - 6009, n=14) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (552 - 696, n=14) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (753 - 2253, n=14) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=231, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (206 - 261, n=14) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (222 - 553, n=15) | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=226, last 2 years) | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (27053 - 59034, n=14) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=227, last 2 years) | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (5265 - 6116, n=14) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (6478 - 11284, n=16) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=232, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (1590 - 1797, n=16) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=230, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (6.62 - 17.4, n=16) | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=224, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (35.1 - 58.5, n=14) | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (0.4584 - 0.515, n=14) | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (5422 - 15620, n=14) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (26386 - 76434, n=14) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (1479 - 3244, n=14) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=223, last 2 years) | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (59278 - 89537, n=14) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (4690 - 8726, n=14) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (15001 - 37738, n=14) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=223, last 2 years) | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (32702 - 92530, n=14) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (443 - 891, n=14) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (3096 - 8448, n=14) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=224, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (22046 - 44164, n=14) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK |
系统性能
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Overall | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=169, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=169, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=169, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
PCMark 10 Score | 6892 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=223, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (43261 - 69735, n=14) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (47313 - 67412, n=14) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (45617 - 59361, n=14) | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=220, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12650H (71.6 - 103.9, n=14) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
目前,配备RTX 40xx卡的笔记本电脑的Nvidia驱动程序在LatencyMon下仍然有非常高的延迟,我们的Katana也不例外。启动该工具后,第一个延迟立即出现。打开几个浏览器标签并播放我们的4K/60帧YouTube视频,将该值急剧上升。但是没有跳帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
来自美光的1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD作为主要存储设备。在Katana中,它并没有完全发挥其性能潜力,而且远远落后于美光2450型号中的Katana GF66或 脉冲GL66.
至少它的性能是相对稳定的,只有在较长的时间内才会有最小的下降。你可以在我们的 "SSD畅销榜 "中找到更多关于该型号的信息。 SSD畅销榜.
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
的 英伟达Geforce RTX 4050是新的RTX 40xx一代的入门卡。它的性能应该大致与旧的 RTX 3060这取决于所选择的TGP(这里是105W),尽管目前的基准测试表明,该卡在超过10W的情况下很难受益。 基准测试表明,该卡很难从超过100W的功率中获益。.
在合成的3DMarks中,该GPU的性能基本达到了预期水平,只是领先于去年的RTX 3060的竞争。这款卡塔纳GF66与 RTX 3070 Ti只领先10%左右。
当然,离开了插座,性能就会受到影响。在另一个Fire Strike ,在电池模式下运行,Katana只达到14,446个图形点,而不是插电时的23,443个点。
3DMark 11 Performance | 27008 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 56030 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 20110 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 8726 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在游戏基准测试中,Katana 15与直接竞争对手相比,往往排名较低。只有XMG Core 15与它的 RTX 3060稍微慢一些,而 脉冲GL66与RTX 3060的速度差不多。的 Legion 5尤其是同样配备RTX 3060的5,明显更快。
另一方面,在《远征5》中,卡塔纳甚至略微领先于竞争对手。所以这也在很大程度上取决于你玩的游戏。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK -3! | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=216, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=224, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=236, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana GF66 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
有一个MUX开关,允许你在MSI中心选择iGPU或dGPU,这总是涉及到重新启动。
Witcher 3 帧率在通常的波动中保持稳定(游戏中的日/夜周期)。但竞争的笔记本电脑往往略快,甚至那些有RTX 3060的笔记本电脑。
GPU时钟速率相当稳定,为2.4GHz,内存时钟也恒定在2GHz。GPU温度不超过76℃,平均在75℃左右。平均76瓦的功耗与规定的105瓦相差甚远。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
GTA V (2015) | 183.5 | 176.6 | 172.7 | 92.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 395 | 293 | 161 | 83 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 175.1 | 158.1 | 150.5 | 142.5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 188 | 120.7 | 82.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 139.9 | 122.4 | 97 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 170 | 135 | 126 | 119 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 214 | 173 | 148.7 | |
Dying Light 2 (2022) | 122.1 | 75.2 | 62.4 |
排放 - 宁静中蕴含着剑的力量
噪声
在桌面上闲置时,风扇大多是静音的,即使在极限性能模式下也是如此,这很不寻常。即使在3DMark06中,风扇也启动得相对较晚,在第一个基准场景结束时只达到37.7分贝。只有 Legion 5更加安静,而 华硕TUF Gaming也同样安静,而姐妹型号和 XMG Core则更响亮。
适度的噪音发展在游戏中也很明显(AI模式),Katana只有在CPU/GPU综合压力下才会变得很吵。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 24 dB(A) |
Load |
| 37.71 / 54.55 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | MSI Katana GF66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK | MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -9% | -11% | 1% | -3% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 26 -8% | 23 4% | 23.3 3% | 23.2 3% | 23 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 24 | 27 -13% | 23 4% | 23.5 2% | 23.6 2% | 23 4% |
Idle Average * | 24 | 28 -17% | 27 -13% | 23.5 2% | 23.6 2% | 23 4% |
Idle Maximum * | 24 | 31 -29% | 27 -13% | 26.8 -12% | 25.4 -6% | 23 4% |
Load Average * | 37.71 | 44 -17% | 48.2 -28% | 29.3 22% | 38 -1% | 42.41 -12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 45.75 | 44 4% | 56.9 -24% | 51.4 -12% | 54.1 -18% | 54.71 -20% |
Load Maximum * | 54.55 | 45 18% | 56.94 -4% | 53 3% | 57.2 -5% | 55.05 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
热点是在靠近背部的中心位置,略低于50℃。掌托在任何时候都保持凉爽,但WASD键在重压下会发热,有点不舒服。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23 °C / 73.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+5.9 °C / 10.6 F).
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | MSI Katana GF66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -17% | -2% | 16% | -2% | 6% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 61 -30% | 50 -6% | 37.8 20% | 44.4 6% | 48 -2% |
Maximum Bottom * | 48 | 55 -15% | 47 2% | 51 -6% | 48.8 -2% | 51 -6% |
Idle Upper Side * | 35 | 43 -23% | 36 -3% | 25.8 26% | 37.8 -8% | 28 20% |
Idle Bottom * | 38 | 38 -0% | 38 -0% | 28.8 24% | 39.6 -4% | 33 13% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
核心以3.1GHz的频率开始我们的压力测试,时间非常短暂。几秒钟后,核心温度上升到89℃,之后时钟速率下降,平均达到稳定的2.5GHz。功耗平均为50W。温度稳定在82℃左右。
GPU的时钟在2到2.5 GHz之间波动。平均温度达到75℃,而功耗只有62W左右。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2,5 | 2.121 | 82 | 75 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 0.6 | 2.400 | 75 | 75 |
发言人
立体声扬声器提供平衡的中音和高音,但几乎没有低音,充其量是中等音量。耳机插孔是模拟设备的理想选择。
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.69 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理--微星Katana的高效RTX 4050
消耗功率
在功耗方面,新的Katana 15比采用上一代GPU的竞争对手更经济。我们的测试模型在空转时有很好的速率,即使在游戏或重度压力下也保持如此。虽然3D性能也略低,但消耗的差异远远大于性能的差异。
例如,无论是Legion 5 ,还是XMG Core 15 ,直至华硕TUF Gaming F15 ,在使用Witcher 3 游戏时的消耗量几乎比我们的Katana 15高出50%!但Katana GF66 ,其RTX 3070 Ti ,在游戏中也只多消耗了16%。
我们测得的短期最大消耗量高达189W。标准的Chicony电源设计为240W,应该能够很好地处理这个问题。
Off / Standby | 0.03 / 0.07 Watt |
Idle | 8.5 / 10.2 / 11.3 Watt |
Load |
84 / 189 Watt |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI Katana GF66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -26% | -6% | -121% | -34% | -34% | -26% | -71% | |
Idle Minimum * | 8.5 | 9 -6% | 7 18% | 19.8 -133% | 6.3 26% | 11.8 -39% | 10.1 ? -19% | 13.8 ? -62% |
Idle Average * | 10.2 | 13 -27% | 13 -27% | 26.2 -157% | 9.8 4% | 14.7 -44% | 15.1 ? -48% | 19.2 ? -88% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.3 | 20 -77% | 13.7 -21% | 48.2 -327% | 26.5 -135% | 15 -33% | 18.3 ? -62% | 27 ? -139% |
Load Average * | 84 | 100 -19% | 48.4 42% | 102.9 -23% | 103.8 -24% | 100 -19% | 87.7 ? -4% | 111.3 ? -33% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 128 | 149 -16% | 148 -16% | 186.7 -46% | 189 -48% | 184 -44% | ||
Load Maximum * | 189 | 212 -12% | 244 -29% | 268 -42% | 241.9 -28% | 237 -25% | 182 ? 4% | 251 ? -33% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption with an External Monitor
电池寿命
经济型笔记本电脑还能在哪里省钱?正确,电池。Katana 15中的模型只有53Wh,这是Katana或Pulse中的标准。其他竞争者的电池容量从62到90Wh不等。因此,尽管能源效率相对较好,但运行时间却相当平庸。
一个电影之夜可以计划大约4小时20分钟。我们的WLAN测试产生了明显不同的结果,这取决于所选择的模式。在最大亮度(258尼特)的平衡模式下,电池只能维持2小时20分钟。另一方面,在150尼特的省电模式下,我们测得的时间与视频测试中的时间差不多。
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh | MSI Katana GF66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 52 Wh | MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -28% | 10% | -6% | -8% | 26% | 29% | |
H.264 | 264 | 237 -10% | 399 ? 51% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 260 | 141 -46% | 302 16% | 285 10% | 465 79% | 368 ? 42% | |
Load | 89 | 81 -9% | 116 30% | 64 -28% | 66 -26% | 64 -28% | 84.2 ? -5% |
Reader / Idle | 483 | 947 | 544 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 预算型RTX 4050仍然太贵了
微星Katana 15 B12将一个12代CPU与一个 RTX 4050这对预算玩家来说其实是个不错的主意。CPU的性能并不差,而且Katana 15的GPU被证明比去年的型号明显更有效率。
然而,我们对预算玩家的主要批评点是价格:虽然你可以从800美元左右买到配备RTX 3060的预算笔记本电脑,但你在这里支付了整整1499.99美元RTX 4050的效率优势并不能证明这个价格的合理性。更重要的是,Katana 15的几乎所有其他部件都明显属于预算级别,从部分过时的端口到相当暗的全高清显示屏,再到相对较小的电池。除此之外,该笔记本电脑的性能往往落后于大多数RTX 3060玩家,而RTX 4050显然没有达到其TGP 105的目标。
微星Katana 15 B12结合了良好的上一代CPU和当前的RTX 4050,但未能设定一个合理的价格,以满足众多预算组件。目前,Katana 15简直太贵了。
毕竟,有很多替代品。如果你想以更低的价格获得更多的性能和更少的预算组件,你最好的选择是 联想Legion 5,其RTX 3060.但其他大多数RTX 3060游戏机也应该更便宜,装备更好,而且大多更快。
价格和可用性
在微星的官方网站,Katana 15 B12VGK-082的售价为1499.99美元。.有兴趣的买家(取决于地点)可以在其他地方的转售商(如亚马逊)找到相同型号的产品,价格更便宜。
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
-
03/28/2023 v7
Christian Hintze
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.