结论 - 不仅仅是处理器更新
从表面上看,第十代 Yoga 7 2-in-1 16 与之前的第九代 Yoga 7 2-in-1 16 相比,只采用了全新的处理器。然而,再往深处看,这些微小的变化会带来明显更好的用户体验。重新排列的端口增加了易用性,键盘字体更大、更容易看清,重量略轻但明显感觉更轻,固态硬盘性能更稳定,电池续航时间也比去年的机型明显增加。休闲游戏玩家可能也会喜欢自适应同步显示和快速集成的 Arc 140V GPU,它可以运行上一代 Iris Xe 无法运行的游戏。
需要注意的主要缺点是对 M.2 固态硬盘的支持有限,而且低端配置的色彩还原能力较弱。大多数笔记本电脑都支持一个或两个全长 80 毫米的固态硬盘,而 Yoga 7 2-in-1 16 却只能支持一个 42 毫米的硬盘。同时,OLED 显示屏也可以解决 IPS 显示屏色彩较差和刷新率较慢的问题,但他准备比我们的 1000 美元测试机多支付几百美元。
Pros
Cons
第 10 代 Yoga 7 2 合 1 16ILL10 接替了去年的第 9 代 Yoga 7 2 合 1 16IML9 Yoga 7 二合一 16IML9的第 10 代 Yoga 7 2 合 1 16ILL10,将老式的 Meteor Lake-U 处理器换成了新式的 Lunar Lake-V 处理器。两款机型在其他方面几乎相同,只是有一些微小但明显的变化,详见本评测。
我们的测试机是中间配置,配备酷睿至尊 7 256V、1200p60 IPS 触摸屏和 16 GB 内存,售价约为 1000 美元。其他 SKU 从 Core Ultra 5 226V 开始,最高配置为 1800p120 Hz OLED 面板和 32 GB 内存。
该领域的竞争对手包括其他中端 16 英寸消费类可转换产品,如 戴尔 Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1或 HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16.
更多联想评测:
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
外壳 - 更轻!
底盘采用了与前代车型相同的铝质材料。 的铝质材料外观和手感都很熟悉。也许最值得注意的是,新款机型的重量减轻了约 200 克,尺寸也与以前略有不同,这可能是由于所有内部变化造成的。总体感觉和刚性保持不变。
连接性
端口选项与去年的机型相比略有变化。现在只有一个 USB-A 端口,而不是两个,两个 USB-C 端口沿左右边缘分开,以便在充电或安装配件时实现更多功能。
SD 读卡器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
交流
网络摄像头
200 万像素网络摄像头标配红外和物理隐私快门。

可持续性
该机型的外盖使用了 50% 的再生铝合金,交流适配器使用了 90% 的消费后成分 (PCC) 再生塑料,键帽和电池使用了 30% 至 50% 的消费后成分 (PCC) 再生塑料。包装不含塑料。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外,没有其他附件。如果在美国购买,制造商通常提供一年有限保修。
输入设备
键盘和触摸板
输入体验与去年的 Yoga 7 2-in-1 16 代 9 或更早的 2023 相同 Yoga 7 二合一 16 代 8因为机身变化不大。最显著的变化是键帽上的印刷现在居中对齐了。除此之外,这种变化只是表面上的。
显示屏
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 317.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 1272:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86, calibrated: 3.06
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 LEN160WUM, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 LEN160FHD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 ATNA60CL09-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 AU Optronics B160QAT, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 90 Hz | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G LP160WQ1-SPB2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 4% | 120% | 116% | 120% | 107% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.7 | 40.9 3% | 99.9 152% | 99.4 150% | 99.6 151% | 96.5 143% |
sRGB Coverage | 57.9 | 61.4 6% | 100 73% | 100 73% | 100 73% | 99.9 73% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41 | 42.3 3% | 96.6 136% | 92.5 126% | 96.5 135% | 84.6 106% |
Response Times | -2% | 98% | -60% | 97% | -12% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30 ? | 32.1 ? -7% | 0.48 ? 98% | 15.4 ? 49% | 0.8 ? 97% | 38.4 ? -28% |
Response Time Black / White * | 22.5 ? | 21.8 ? 3% | 0.64 ? 97% | 60.6 ? -169% | 0.89 ? 96% | 21.4 ? 5% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 2753.7 ? | 491.8 ? | |||
Screen | 6% | 52% | 50% | 47% | 12% | |
Brightness middle | 317.9 | 313.3 -1% | 387 22% | 413 30% | 399.4 26% | 329 3% |
Brightness | 304 | 294 -3% | 392 29% | 409 35% | 405 33% | 310 2% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 82 -9% | 98 9% | 97 8% | 98 9% | 88 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.35 -40% | 0.14 44% | 0.39 -56% | ||
Contrast | 1272 | 895 -30% | 2950 132% | 844 -34% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.39 | 4.41 40% | 1 86% | 3.48 53% | 4.05 45% | 3.52 52% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.43 | 15.75 27% | 1.9 91% | 6.97 67% | 6.69 69% | 6.96 68% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.06 | 1.84 40% | 1.02 67% | 1.15 62% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.5 | 4.4 32% | 1.7 74% | 4.5 31% | 1.1 83% | 5.75 12% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.3 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.15 102% | 2.27 97% | 2.137 103% |
CCT | 6140 106% | 7395 88% | 6325 103% | 6446 101% | 6419 101% | 7584 86% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
5% | 90% /
79% | 35% /
48% | 88% /
74% | 36% /
29% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
22.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.7 ms rise | |
↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.5 ms rise | |
↘ 16.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8445 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 相同但更高效
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。联想 Vantage 中没有专门的电源配置文件,以简化可用模式的数量。
处理器
酷睿 Ultra 7 256V 酷睿至尊 7 256V每瓦性能优先于原始性能,因此 H 系列处理器,如 酷睿至尊 7 155H或 Ryzen AI 9 HX 275仍然要快得多。相反,它的性能更接近于较早的 U 系列处理器,如酷睿 i7-1355U但更快的内存和用于兼容 Co-Pilot+ 的集成 NPU 是它的额外优势。
请注意,降级到 酷睿至尊 5 226V配置的处理器性能会略有下降,降幅仅约 5%,因此对于预算有限的买家来说是一个不错的选择。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (2680 - 2784, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (12139 - 12812, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (57609 - 61614, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (2632 - 2814, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (49622 - 49794, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (4425 - 4431, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (30465 - 32644, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (38495 - 40828, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (536 - 632, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (6196 - 6878, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (51767 - 52282, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G -1! | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6711 - 7367, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9627 - 11365, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (8832 - 9431, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9481 - 10126, n=4) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1636 - 1736, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1563 - 1682, n=4) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1862 - 1962, n=4) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1215 - 1343, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (243 - 310, n=4) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (282 - 286, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (471 - 480, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7367 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (99227 - 104459, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (86352 - 89144, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (108692 - 117933, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (96.1 - 99.6, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备配备了 西部数据 PC SN7100S而不是去年型号上的 SK Hynix。如下图所示,西部数据硬盘明显更快、更稳定。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
虽然处理器的原始性能与酷睿 i7-1355U 相似,但 Arc 140V 的图形性能却与酷睿 i7-1355U 不相上下。 Arc 140V根据 3DMark 基准测试,Arc 140V 的图形性能明显快了 2.5 倍,比使用不到一年的 Arc 8.大多数较老的游戏都能以原生 FHD 分辨率正常运行,而《赛博朋克 2077》等要求更高的游戏则只能通过较低的设置来获得更高的帧率。
电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 9819 | 21844 | 3427 |
均衡模式 | 9715 (-1%) | 20774 (-5%) | 3275 (-4%) |
电池供电 | 9635 (-2%) | 21279 (-3%) | 3487 (-2%) |
如Fire Strike 上表所示,在平衡模式或电池供电模式下运行时,性能基本保持不变。
3DMark 11 Performance | 12128 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8894 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4334 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (34.4 - 66.4, n=16) | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (15.8 - 21.2, n=14) |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 96.2 | 89.3 | 68.5 | 84.9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 85 | 48.3 | 34.7 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 43.2 | 37.9 | 36.8 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 238 | 82.9 | 68.4 | 58.5 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 41.7 | 35.4 | 30.2 | 29.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 46.5 | 35.6 | 31.7 | 27.8 |
F1 24 (2024) | 89.7 | 79.2 | 59 | 20 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.3 / 23.3 / 25.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 40.2 / 41.6 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-512G-1101 | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 1TB | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02 | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 7% | 5% | -3% | 9% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 23.3 | 22.8 2% | 23.6 -1% | 22.9 2% | 22.9 2% | 25.1 -8% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.3 | 22.8 2% | 23.6 -1% | 22.9 2% | 23 1% | 25.1 -8% |
Idle Average * | 23.3 | 22.8 2% | 23.6 -1% | 22.9 2% | 23 1% | 25.1 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.7 | 22.8 11% | 23.6 8% | 25 3% | 23 11% | 26.1 -2% |
Load Average * | 40.2 | 30.8 23% | 29.4 27% | 45.1 -12% | 23.8 41% | 31.4 22% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 41.6 | 40.6 2% | 44.9 -8% | |||
Load Maximum * | 41.6 | 40.8 2% | 40.6 2% | 44.9 -8% | 43.8 -5% | 36.6 12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 31 | 43.8 | 41.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在负载情况下,WASD 键周围的热点温度可低至 40 摄氏度,比 戴尔 Inspiron 16 7640 2 合 1的平均温度。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+0.8 °C / 1.4 F).
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 2% | 1% | -19% | -10% | -31% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42.6 | 37.8 11% | 40.9 4% | 46.8 -10% | 42.6 -0% | 55 -29% |
Maximum Bottom * | 36.8 | 38.8 -5% | 45.1 -23% | 45.6 -24% | 47.8 -30% | 55.4 -51% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.4 | 25.4 4% | 23.8 10% | 32.2 -22% | 27.4 -4% | 34.9 -32% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.6 | 26.8 -1% | 23.5 12% | 31.4 -18% | 27.8 -5% | 30 -13% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 37 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.8 | -- | 86 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.6 | 1600 | 84 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 1.3 | 1950 | 87 |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-512G-1101, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2550 1TB, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 4% | 2% | -57% | -17% | -20% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 3 29% | 5.3 -26% | 6.1 -45% | 5 -19% | 5.5 -31% |
Idle Average * | 8.3 | 8.5 -2% | 6.7 19% | 13.5 -63% | 6.2 25% | 7.2 13% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.5 | 8.9 6% | 7.3 23% | 13.8 -45% | 14.7 -55% | 12.9 -36% |
Load Average * | 40.3 | 41.1 -2% | 37.6 7% | 63.6 -58% | 49.9 -24% | 55 -36% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 40.8 | 42.8 -5% | 64.6 -58% | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 47.4 | 44.6 6% | 67 -41% | |||
Load Maximum * | 59 | 64.6 -9% | 64.1 -9% | 109.7 -86% | 65 -10% | 63.6 -8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 30.7 | 54.5 | 47 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
与上一代机型相比,运行时间大幅缩短了几个小时。
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 70 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 71 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 76 Wh | Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 90 Wh | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -39% | -46% | -43% | -62% | -40% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 1202 | 738 -39% | 646 -46% | 686 -43% | 459 -62% | 716 -40% |
H.264 | 1181 | |||||
Load | 128 | 93 | 116 | 121 | ||
Reader / Idle | 1310 | 935 |
笔记本检查评级
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10
- 05/07/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1000 USD | 1.9 kg | 15.85 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $755.00 List Price: 900 USD | 2.1 kg | 16.99 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,699.99 List Price: 1799€ | 1.7 kg | 12.8 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $989.66 List Price: 1000 USD | 2.1 kg | 18.99 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI Mini-LED | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1300 USD | 1.8 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G Intel Core i7-1360P ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1699€ | 1.5 kg | 17.2 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.