Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

AMD R9 7900X

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 是拉斐尔系列中速度最快的高端台式机处理器。它基于支持超线程（24 线程）的 Zen 4 架构，提供 12 个内核。内核频率从 4.7 GHz（基本）到 5.7 GHz（单核提升）不等。当所有 12 个内核都满载时，5.1 GHz 是最高时钟频率。7900X 是上市时第二快的 Ryzen 处理器，仅次于多 4 个核心的 Ryzen 9 7950X。

R9 7900X 的性能明显优于旧版的 Ryzen 9 5900X得益于改进的架构和现代 5 纳米工艺。与英特尔 Raptor Lake Core i9-13700K 相比，单核性能略低，多核性能略快。游戏性能略低，平均水平仅与酷睿 i5-13600K 相当，也低于老款 Ryzen 7 5800X3D。

拉斐尔系列仍然采用芯片组设计，两个 CCD 集群（每个集群有 8 个可能的核心）采用 5 纳米工艺，IO-die（包括内存控制器和 Radeon Graphics iGPU）采用 6 纳米工艺。

SeriesAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)
CodenameRaphael (Zen4)

Series: Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) Raphael (Zen4)

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X « 4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 79003.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 77003.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 76003.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock Rate4700 - 5600 MHz
Level 1 Cache768 KB
Level 2 Cache12 MB
Level 3 Cache64 MB
Number of Cores / Threads12 / 24
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)170 Watt
Transistor CountCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million
Features5 nm (CCD), 6 nm (I/O) nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
Die Size2x 70 (CCD) mm2 + 122 (I/O) mm2
Max. Temperature95 °C
SocketAM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
GPUAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date09/26/2022

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
57.1 pt (79%)
AMD E1-2100
2.47 -96%
...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
52.5 -8%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
53.1 -7%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
53.4 -6%
Intel Core i7-13700K
54.1 -5%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900
54.2 -5%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
54.5 -5%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
55.1 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
56.8 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
57 0%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
57.1
Intel Core i7-14700K
57.8 1%
Intel Core i9-13900K
59.3 4%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
60.4 6%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
61.1 7%
Intel Core i9-14900K
61.7 8%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
72.1 26%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 28925     avg: 29289     median: 29300 (27%)     max: 29628 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2012     avg: 2020     median: 2016.5 (86%)     max: 2039 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 780     avg: 783     median: 782.5 (87%)     max: 787 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 11353     avg: 11474     median: 11471.5 (28%)     max: 11623 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4753     avg: 4818     median: 4820.5 (30%)     max: 4856 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
31 -99%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7900
4020 -17%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
4320 -10%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
4324 -10%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
4376 -9%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4407 -9%
Intel Core i7-13700K
4508 -6%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4522 -6%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
4565 -5%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4724 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
4818
Intel Core i7-14700K
5459 13%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
5497 14%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
5600 16%
Intel Core i9-13900K
5798 20%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
5835 21%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
5974 24%
Intel Core i9-14900K
6282 30%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
7053 46%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
9706 101%
...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
15842 229%
0%
100%
02505007501000125015001750200022502500275030003250350037504000425045004750Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 319     avg: 322.2     median: 323 (97%)     max: 325 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 53.91     avg: 54.6     median: 54.7 (71%)     max: 55.26 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.78     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (95%)     max: 3.85 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8465     avg: 8658     median: 8623 (52%)     max: 8858 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 67036     avg: 68658     median: 68579.5 (50%)     max: 70741 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 121250     avg: 126872     median: 125768 (87%)     max: 134469 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 16151     avg: 16234     median: 16246 (20%)     max: 16338 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 39.576     avg: 40.4     median: 40.3 (0%)     max: 41.122 s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 1.781     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (0%)     max: 1.872 s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
17225 points (27%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 124975     avg: 127080     median: 127195 (73%)     max: 129087 MIPS
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 8252     avg: 8280     median: 8269 (99%)     max: 8345 MIPS
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
241 fps (84%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
376 fps (87%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 36.2     avg: 36.8     median: 36.9 (65%)     max: 37.1 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.8 GB/s (48%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.8 GB/s (39%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 165     avg: 166.4     median: 166 (2%)     max: 168 Seconds
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 105     avg: 106.2     median: 106 (1%)     max: 107 Seconds
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3643     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3758 sec
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 20439     avg: 21223     median: 21284 (45%)     max: 21659 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.1 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
13.3 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
313.4 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 82063     avg: 100438     median: 102019 (89%)     max: 102765 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 26455     avg: 27800     median: 27731 (75%)     max: 28963 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 96003     avg: 102745     median: 103232 (84%)     max: 105350 Points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 97281     avg: 102964     median: 103220 (84%)     max: 106230 Points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 94657     avg: 102993     median: 101826 (86%)     max: 108551 Points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 25631     avg: 26260     median: 26310.5 (67%)     max: 26732 Points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 40436     avg: 42329     median: 42325 (75%)     max: 43200 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 13634     avg: 15940     median: 15959.5 (67%)     max: 16721 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2274     avg: 2290     median: 2294 (97%)     max: 2297 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19987     avg: 20553     median: 20667.5 (37%)     max: 20799 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2183     avg: 2195     median: 2196 (10%)     max: 2201 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19975     avg: 20532     median: 20658 (65%)     max: 20765 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9193     avg: 9260     median: 9275 (93%)     max: 9311 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 74731     avg: 76662     median: 77033 (86%)     max: 77769 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 431     avg: 438     median: 440 (1%)     max: 441 ms
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 300     avg: 305.8     median: 304.5 (88%)     max: 314 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 371     avg: 383.8     median: 383 (80%)     max: 395 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2315     avg: 2370     median: 2370 (91%)     max: 2408 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
319 Watt (55%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
313 Watt (57%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
94.1 Watt (62%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
15.5 Points per Watt (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.26
log 24. 11:28:53

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.01s ... 0.011s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#10 composed specs +0s ... 0.013s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14608 +0.016s ... 0.029s

#13 got single benchmarks 14608 +0.055s ... 0.084s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.084s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +1.155s ... 1.239s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 1.239s

#17 return log +0s ... 1.239s

Reviews for the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X processor

诺托亚NH-D12L

Noctua NH-D12L回顾。强大的高级CPU散热器，适用于所有常见的插座

诺克托亚以其高质量的散热器而闻名，其产品系列涵盖了所有常见的平台。通过诺克托亚NH-D12L，我们对另一款散热器进行了审查，并检查了它对AMD Ryzen 9 7900X的应对情况。...
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | 32.00"
Noctua NH-D15和Noctua NH-U12A

Noctua NH-D15和NH-U12A评测。适用于所有常见CPU插座的两款强大的空气冷却器

诺克托亚提供了一系列强大的空气冷却器，能够保持当前的旗舰CPU的控制。在这篇简短的评论中，你会发现诺克托亚NH-D15和诺克托亚NH-U12A应对AMD Ryzen 9 7900X的效果如何。...
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | 32.00"
Noctua NH-D15和Noctua NH-U12A

Noctua NH-D15和NH-U12A评测。适用于所有常见CPU插座的两款强大的空气冷却器

诺克托亚提供了一系列强大的空气冷却器，能够保持当前的旗舰CPU的控制。在这篇简短的评论中，你会发现诺克托亚NH-D15和诺克托亚NH-U12A应对AMD Ryzen 9 7900X的效果如何。...
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | 32.00"
Noctua NH-D15和Noctua NH-U12A

Noctua NH-D15和NH-U12A评测。适用于所有常见CPU插座的两款强大的空气冷却器

诺克托亚提供了一系列强大的空气冷却器，能够保持当前的旗舰CPU的控制。在这篇简短的评论中，你会发现诺克托亚NH-D15和诺克托亚NH-U12A应对AMD Ryzen 9 7900X的效果如何。...
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | 32.00"
Noctua NH-D15和Noctua NH-U12A

Noctua NH-D15和NH-U12A评测。适用于所有常见CPU插座的两款强大的空气冷却器

诺克托亚提供了一系列强大的空气冷却器，能够保持当前的旗舰CPU的控制。在这篇简短的评论中，你会发现诺克托亚NH-D15和诺克托亚NH-U12A应对AMD Ryzen 9 7900X的效果如何。...
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | 32.00"

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, 0.00"
  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 7900X和AMD Ryzen 5 7600X的回顾。拉斐尔重回最快游戏CPU之列!

Please share our article, every link counts!

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)

» AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.7 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
   16x 4.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
   12x 4.7 GHz - 5.6 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 7900
   12x 3.7 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
   8x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7700
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
   8x 4.2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
   6x 4.7 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 5 7600
   6x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core i9-14900K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 6 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.7 GHz
+ Intel Core i9-13900K
   24x 3 GHz - 5.8 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
   16x 4.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
+ Intel Core i7-14700K
   20x 2.5 GHz - 5.6 GHz
» AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
   12x 4.7 GHz - 5.6 GHz
- Intel Core i7-13700K
   16x 3.4 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
   32x 3.5 GHz - 4.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7900
   12x 3.7 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- Intel Core i9-12900K
   16x 3.2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- Intel Core i5-14600K
   14x 3.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > AMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) R9 7900X 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-11-26)