Notebookcheck Logo

MediaTek Dimensity 9300+

Mediatek Dimensity 9300+

联发科技 Dimensity 9300+（9300 Plus）是一款用于智能手机和平板电脑的高端 SoC，基于Android 。该处理器首次不再使用传统的节能内核，而只使用所谓的大内核。CPU 部分集成了一个主频高达 3.4 GHz 的快速 ARM Cortex-X4 内核、三个主频高达 2.9 GHz 的低频 X4 内核和四个主频高达 2 GHz 的较小 Cortex-A520 内核。快速初级内核也是与相同的 Dimensity 9300.与后者一样，SoC 提供了 18 MB 三级高速缓存。

不出所料，在最初的基准测试中，小米 14T Pro 的性能略快于 Dimensity 9300，可与 骁龙 8 代 3(在 Geekbench 6 中）。在 PCMark 和 Crossmark 中，性能稍差，与 高通骁龙 8 代 2.

集成的联发科 APU 790 完全依赖于生成式人工智能（Generative AI），旨在将适应的算法加速 8 倍。据说能效提高了 45%。有了 MiraVision 990，显示器可以在高达 120 Hz 的超高清条件下运行，还支持谷歌 Ultra HDR 图像显示（来自Android 14）。

图形处理器为 ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12使用。

SoC 采用台积电第三代 4 纳米工艺（N4X）制造。

CodenameCortex-X4 / A720
SeriesMediatek Dimensity 9000

Series: Dimensity 9000 Cortex-X4 / A720

MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ « 2 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores18 MB L3 Cortex-X4 / A720
MediaTek Dimensity 93002 - 3.25 GHz8 / 8 cores18 MB L3 Cortex-X4 / A720
Clock Rate2000 - 3400 MHz
Level 3 Cache18 MB
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 8
1 x 3.4 GHz ARM Cortex-X4
3 x 2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-X4
4 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A720
Manufacturing Technology4 nm
FeaturesARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, Wi-Fi 7 up to 6.5 GBit/s, Bluetooth 5.4, LPDDR5T-9600 @ 4800 MHz, Imagiq 990, AI 5G Modem up to 7 GBit/s,
64 Bit64 Bit support
ArchitectureARM
Announcement Date11/06/2023
Product Link (external)www.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 7393     avg: 7609     median: 7451 (70%)     max: 7982 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2167     avg: 2195     median: 2189.5 (55%)     max: 2234 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 6972     avg: 7148     median: 7146 (28%)     max: 7327 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
491 -93%
...
Apple A15 Bionic
5661 -21%
Google Tensor G5
6108 -15%
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
6239 -13%
Samsung Exynos 2400e
6341 -11%
Apple A16 Bionic
6448 -10%
Samsung Exynos 2400
6495 -9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
6605 -8%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
6783 -5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
6977 -2%
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
7148
Apple A17 Pro
7299 2%
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
7408 4%
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
7439 4%
Samsung Exynos 2500
7911 11%
Apple A18
8023 12%
Mediatek Dimensity 9400
8068 13%
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
8355 17%
Apple A18 Pro
8546 20%
Apple M1
8622 21%
...
Apple M4 (10 cores)
14978 110%
max:
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
25760 260%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1598     avg: 1623     median: 1632 (64%)     max: 1639 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Mediatek MT6737
58 -96%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
1440 -11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1455 -10%
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+
1541 -5%
Apple A14 Bionic
1549 -5%
Samsung Exynos 2400
1560 -4%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
1561 -4%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
1574 -3%
Samsung Exynos 2400e
1581 -3%
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
1604 -1%
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
1623
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
1651 2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
1684 4%
Samsung Exynos 2500
1687 4%
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
1692 4%
Apple A15 Bionic
1723 6%
Apple M1
1729 7%
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
1844 14%
Apple A16 Bionic
1882 16%
Xiaomi Xring O1
1914 18%
...
Apple A18 Pro
2437 50%
max:
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
2559 58%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6478     avg: 6744     median: 6678 (12%)     max: 7077 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Mediatek MT6580M
248 -96%
...
Samsung Exynos 2400e
5622 -17%
Samsung Exynos 2400
5716 -15%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
6007 -11%
Apple A18
6130 -9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
6163 -9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
6245 -7%
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
6607 -2%
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
6681 -1%
Apple A18 Pro
6687 -1%
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
6744
Xiaomi Xring O1
7126 6%
Mediatek Dimensity 9400
7131 6%
Samsung Exynos 2500
7154 6%
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
7209 7%
Apple M1
7501 11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
7614 13%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8022 19%
Apple M2
8812 31%
Apple M3
10603 57%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
55811 728%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9443     avg: 9448     median: 9448 (94%)     max: 9453 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 30323     avg: 30653     median: 30653 (31%)     max: 30983 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 591.54     avg: 997     median: 635.9 (1%)     max: 2123.5 ms
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 25646     avg: 53467     median: 58584.5 (43%)     max: 71054 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 78     avg: 162.5     median: 189.5 (52%)     max: 193 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
min: 1404870     avg: 1813270     median: 1879900 (62%)     max: 2088410 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
min: 277635     avg: 431749     median: 474330 (14%)     max: 500701 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 37.1     avg: 100.6     median: 127.2 (87%)     max: 137.6 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 1487     avg: 1911     median: 1649 (46%)     max: 2596 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 39.6     avg: 56.3     median: 55.2 (27%)     max: 74 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 1504     avg: 1758     median: 1752 (44%)     max: 2019 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 16494     avg: 32269     median: 30758 (13%)     max: 49556 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 14377     avg: 15964     median: 16368.5 (60%)     max: 16743 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 956     avg: 1222     median: 1342 (50%)     max: 1367 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.65     avg: 8.7     median: 9 (4%)     max: 11.2 Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.699     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (3%)     max: 4.16 Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.33
log 11. 14:32:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:50:58 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.012s ... 0.013s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.013s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18426 +0.003s ... 0.016s

#8 got single benchmarks 18426 +0.015s ... 0.031s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.33s ... 0.36s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.36s

#12 return log +0s ... 0.36s

Reviews for the MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ processor

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 评测--最大的Android 平板电脑现在依赖联发科技术

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 评测--最大的Android 平板电脑现在依赖联发科技术

今年，三星主要对其最大的高端平板电脑进行了微调。它的座右铭是更快更长。在这篇评测中，你可以发现Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 为什么仍然是行业标杆，以及我们还缺少哪些功能。 ...
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 | 14.60" | 718 g
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 笔记本评测

人工智能平板电脑的显示屏有问题--三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 评测

据三星称，Galaxy Tab S10+ 是一款专为人工智能功能开发的平板电脑。然而，这家制造商在处理器的选择上有了新的突破。在我们的 Tab S10 Plus 评测中，我们将仔细研究Galaxy Tab 是否真的使用了这款芯片组。...
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 | 12.40" | 571 g
Notebookcheck 小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测

小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测：亮度惊人的价格杀手

小米公司将其 14T Pro 视为高端智能手机，售价不到 800 欧元（约合 867 美元）。在我们的测试中，这款小米智能手机配备了徕卡摄像头，其 144Hz AMOLED 显示面板显示出极高的亮度。这款旗舰杀手手机的其他配置也几乎没有让人失望。...
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 | 6.67" | 209 g

Vivo X200 FE: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 6.31", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X200 FE

Vivo S30 Pro mini: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 6.31", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo S30 Pro mini

Vivo T4 Ultra: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo T4 Ultra

Vivo S20 Pro: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo S20 Pro

Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12.40", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+

Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 6.67", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 14.60", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra

Xiaomi 14T Pro: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 14T Pro

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 14.60", 0.7 kg
   » 三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 与 Tab S9 Ultra：联发科碾压高通--效率问题迫在眉睫

Xiaomi 14T Pro: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » 小米 14T 和小米 14T Pro：根据 DxOMark 相机分析，Pro 机型的附加费用并不值得

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 14.60", 0.7 kg
   » 三星Galaxy Tab S10：推出至少两个 iPad Pro 竞争对手的第一个迹象与Galaxy S25

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12.40", 0.6 kg
   » 三星Galaxy Tab S10：推出至少两个 iPad Pro 竞争对手的第一个迹象与Galaxy S25

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Dimensity 9000

» MediaTek Dimensity 9500
   8x - 4 GHz
» Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
   8x - 3.73 GHz
» Mediatek Dimensity 9400
   8x 2 GHz - 3.62 GHz
» Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
   8x 2 GHz - 3.4 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
   8x 2 GHz - 3.4 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9300
   8x 2 GHz - 3.25 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9200+
   8x 2 GHz - 3.35 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9200
   8x 1.8 GHz - 3.05 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9000
   8x 1.8 GHz - 3.05 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
   8x 2.3 GHz - 3.39 GHz
+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
   8x 2.3 GHz - 3.3 GHz
+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
   8x 2 GHz - 3.2 GHz
+ Apple A16 Bionic
   6x 2.02 GHz - 3.46 GHz
+ Samsung Exynos 2500
   10x 1.8 GHz - 3.3 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
   8x 2 GHz - 3.4 GHz
- MediaTek Dimensity 9300
   8x 2 GHz - 3.25 GHz
- Google Tensor G5
   8x 2.25 GHz - 3.78 GHz
- Samsung Exynos 2400
   10x 2 GHz - 3.2 GHz
- Samsung Exynos 2400e
   10x 2 GHz - 3.1 GHz
- Apple A15 Bionic
   6x 2.02 GHz - 3.23 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-10-21)