全面战争法老》评测：笔记本电脑和台式机基准测试

前往埃及 老牌游戏《全面战争》系列又添新成员：《Pharao》。由于采用了集成基准，这款游戏非常适合我们的性能测试。我们对多款笔记本电脑和台式机 GPU 进行了测试，看看它们运行游戏的性能如何。

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/20/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Laptop / Notebook Desktop Gamecheck

测试笔记本电脑

我们目前使用这些笔记本电脑进行游戏基准测试。点击照片可进入相应制造商的网站。所有其他测试系统（塔式电脑、迷你电脑......）都列在文章末尾。

技术

到目前为止，《全面战争：法老王》在媒体上颇受好评，但在社区中的反馈却褒贬不一。我们的基准文章主要关注《全面战争》新分支的技术和速度。

由于是沙漠景观，《法老王》的画面在某些地方显得有些沉闷，但特写镜头（尤其是在战斗情况下）的视觉效果相当不错。除了纹理和植被，单位和特效（模拟水等）也很现代，但不会让人眼前一亮。

图形菜单也令人印象深刻。首先是主选项卡，由于目前有七个选项，所以还是比较清晰的。在这里，你可以调整分辨率（缩放）、整体质量（有四个预设值）、图片模式、亮度和伽玛值。在 "高级 "选项卡中，开发人员几乎做得太过火了。对于一款 PC 游戏（尤其是策略游戏）来说，近 30 个细节滑块的数量实在太多了，如果你对预设值不满意，还需要进行大量滚动操作。

一个积极的方面：无需重启游戏即可应用更改，非常实用。个别设置的解释和某些情况下的对比图片也非常有用。玩家只需在没有 FSR 和 DLSS 等现代功能的情况下使用即可。游戏占用的存储空间适中，为 41 GB。

基准

尤其值得称赞的是，游戏中集成了一个基准。更准确地说，有三个基准，因为您可以在战斗、攻城和战役序列中进行选择。后者的运行速度明显更快，而前两者在性能方面几乎没有任何共同之处。我们使用的是攻城战基准测试，它在视觉上最吸引人（见视频）。约 1.5 分钟的序列显示了一个跟踪镜头，在花哨的金字塔背景前对一个定居点或城市以及相应的周边地区进行了各种特写和远景拍摄。

帧速率在很大程度上取决于摄像机距离和显示的单位数量或单位活动。为了应对各种情况，我们建议显卡的平均基准值至少为 40 FPS。

成果

全高清（1,920 x 1,080）

与大多数策略游戏类似，《全面战争法老王》在图形处理能力方面也相当节俭。即使 iGPU 达到 Radeon 680M的 iGPU，游戏也能以 1,920 x 1,080 像素和全细节设置运行。

Total War Pharaoh
1920x1080 Low Preset 1920x1080 Medium Preset 1920x1080 High Preset 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	396 fps ∼100% 280 fps ∼100% 229 fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Neo 17 E23	317 (194^min) fps ∼80% 220 (131^min) fps ∼79% 177 (95^min) fps ∼77%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	278 (155^min) fps ∼70% 187 (108^min) fps ∼67% 154 (85^min) fps ∼67%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX Schenker Key 17 Pro E23	281 (54^min) fps ∼71% 192 (112^min) fps ∼69% 154 (81^min) fps ∼67%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	263 (161^min) fps ∼66% 166 (97^min) fps ∼59% 129 (76^min) fps ∼56%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX	256 (146^min) fps ∼65% 157 (90^min) fps ∼56% 123 (73^min) fps ∼54%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	239 (158^min) fps ∼60% 149 (103^min) fps ∼53% 116 (75^min) fps ∼51%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Focus 15 E23	212 (164^min) fps ∼54% 128 (99^min) fps ∼46% 101 (78^min) fps ∼44%
AMD Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS Asus ROG Zephyrus G14	236 (134^min) fps ∼100% 164 (100^min) fps ∼41% 111 (69^min) fps ∼40% 91.5 (55^min) fps ∼40%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro	87.9 fps ∼37% 68.6 fps ∼17% 43.8 fps ∼16% 34.7 fps ∼15%
AMD Radeon 680M, R9 6900HS Asus ROG Zephyrus G14	72.4 (61^min) fps ∼31% 65.1 (54^min) fps ∼16% 52.6 (38^min) fps ∼19% 46.3 (31^min) fps ∼20%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

使用 2,560 x 1,440 像素和 Ultra 预设值的设备也不一定非得是高端设备。AGeForce RTX 4050已经突破了 60 FPS 大关。

Total War Pharaoh
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	205 fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Neo 17 E23	169 (94^min) fps ∼82%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	151 (91^min) fps ∼74%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX Schenker Key 17 Pro E23	136 (83^min) fps ∼66%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX	98.4 (69^min) fps ∼48%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	95.4 (74^min) fps ∼47%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	81.6 (63^min) fps ∼40%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Focus 15 E23	66.6 (52^min) fps ∼32%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro	22.1 fps ∼11%

超高清（3,840 x 2,160）

即使是 3,840 x 2,160 和最高设置，某些中端芯片也能轻松应对。然而GeForce RTX 4060会比较安全。

Total War Pharaoh
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	117 fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	98.4 (79^min) fps ∼84%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Neo 17 E23	96.1 (77^min) fps ∼82%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX Schenker Key 17 Pro E23	74.5 (60^min) fps ∼64%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX	53.5 (37^min) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	47.1 (38^min) fps ∼40%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	40.2 (32^min) fps ∼34%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Focus 15 E23	32.3 (26^min) fps ∼28%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro	10.6 fps ∼9%

请注意

由于游戏测试非常耗时，而且经常受到安装或激活限制，我们只能在本文发布后为您提供部分基准测试。稍后将添加更多显卡。

Overview

All test systems

笔记本电脑	显卡	处理器	内存
XMG Neo 17 E23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 @175 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6X)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Schenker Key 17 Pro E23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 @175 W TGP (12 GB GDDR6X)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Focus 15 E23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 @140 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
华硕 ROG Strix Scar 17	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti @150 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-12900H	2 x 16 GB DDR5
华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14	AMD Radeon RX 6800S (8 GB GDDR6) & AMD Radeon 680M	AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	2 x 16 GB DDR5

塔式电脑	显卡	处理器	内存
华硕 ROG Strix Z790-F	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 (16 GB GDDR6X) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900K	2 x 24 GB DDR5 G.Skill

迷你 PC	显卡	处理器	内存
Minisforum UM790 Pro	AMD Radeon 780M	AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2 x 32 GB DDR5

操作系统	Nvidia 驱动程序	AMD 驱动程序
Windows 11	ForceWare 537.58	Adrenalin 23.10.1

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 222 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 391930 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 全面战争法老》评测：笔记本电脑和台式机基准测试

Florian Glaser, 2023-10-20 (Update: 2023-10-20)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > Total War Pharaoh (2023)
Pos	Model	low 1920x1080 Low Preset	med. 1920x1080 Medium Preset	high 1920x1080 High Preset	ultra 1920x1080 Ultra Preset	QHD 2560x1440 Ultra Preset	4K 3840x2160 Ultra Preset
2	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	565.7ⁿ³	348.2ⁿ³	231.3ⁿ³	187.1ⁿ³	186.2ⁿ³	158.2ⁿ³
3	AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX	599.7	406.6	285	230.6	216.1	125.8
4	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super	636.25ⁿ²	410.8ⁿ²	286.1ⁿ²	232.15ⁿ²	213.25ⁿ²	120.1ⁿ²
5	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080		396	280	229	205	117
8	AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT		278	187	154	151	98.4
11	AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT	564.3	339.7	229	184.7	166	87
12	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		317	227.5ⁿ²	177.5ⁿ²	164.5ⁿ²	96.1
14	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	558.3	343.4	225.2	182.6	156	86.8
22	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU		281	192	154	136	74.5
24	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB		372	252	206	152	81.8
30	AMD Radeon RX 6800	506.6	334.8	205	168	121.6	61
31	AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT	519.1	333.2	209.7	169.6	122.8	60.5
32	NVIDIA Titan RTX	493	319.6	200.9	159.9	116	60.8
33	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti	508.5	321.8	202.4	163.5	119.4	62.9
36	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		256	157	123	98.4	53.5
37	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	385.9	251.25ⁿ²	156.1ⁿ²	121.15ⁿ²	91.3ⁿ²	47.1
40	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070		334	200	159	111	57.7
41	AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT	466.9	318.4	191.1	155.5	103.8	51.1
43	AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT	463.8	310.4	183.2	148.5	97.8	48
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Total War Pharaoh
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
44	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	349.9	220.3	133.8	103.5	78.6	42.1
45	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	444	283.9	175.8	139.6	97.1	49.8
46	Intel Arc A770	386	244	151	119	86	46
48	AMD Radeon RX 7600	402.9	271.5	163.1	129.1	83.3	40.8
53	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU		216ⁿ²	138.5ⁿ²	110ⁿ²	78.8ⁿ²	40.2
58	AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT	396.3	267.9	151.2	121	77.5	36.2
62	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	329.3	205.4	127.1	99.1	78.3	42.5
64	AMD Radeon RX 6800S	236	164	111	91.5
65*	AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT	300.7ⁿ²	179.15ⁿ²	114.05ⁿ²	89.35ⁿ²	63.55ⁿ²	33ⁿ²
66	Intel Arc A750	367.2	231.4	137	108.7	77.4	40.6
71*	Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU	242	209.5ⁿ²	138.5ⁿ²	109ⁿ²	82ⁿ²
76	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	398.7	266.7	149.4	118.1	80.6	41.8
80	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)	386.7	253.9	147.1	114.7	79	41.1
84	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)	336.7	238.7	126.8	104.1	66.1	31.7
86*	AMD Radeon RX 7600M		145	90.5	72.9	49	24.4
89	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU				97.3	69.3	36.5
91	AMD Radeon RX 7600S		189	117	92.7	62.8	31.6
97	Intel Arc A580	349.7	218.9	125	98.1	67.5	34.8
98	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)	352	230.7	132.3	103.3	70.5	35.6
100	AMD Radeon RX 6600	316.1	217.3	115.8	93.7	58.8	27.7
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Total War Pharaoh
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
102*	Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU	212	140	77	58	42
104	AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)	310.3	220.3	113.8	93.6	59.2	28.3
106	AMD Radeon RX 6600M	286.2	186.4	112.6	91.4	59.2	27.4
117*	Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU	193	125	67	53	35
134	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)	278.4	206.5	105.9	87.5	55.2	25.8
142	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)	252.3	165	92.6	72.7	48	23.5
143	AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT	188.9	143.1	81.5	66	40.7	16.9
144	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)	191.7	136.7	70.5	58.3	37	17.7
145	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU		179.5ⁿ²	106.05ⁿ²	80.35ⁿ²	66.6	32.3
148*	Intel Arc A730M	233.6ⁿ²	139ⁿ²	84ⁿ²	67.1ⁿ²	53.3	27.3
152	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	183.5	127.2	82.4	66.3
158	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)	209.8	144.2	82.8	65.9	43.5	21.1
161	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)	201.9	136.5	75.4	59.5	38.7	19.2
167	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU		106.1	62	48.8
173	AMD Radeon RX 6500M	141.9	87.7	53.3	37
187	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	156.8	94.7	57.1	45.1
189	AMD Radeon RX 5500M	117.6	79.1	53.6	43.4
198	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	80.7	50.4	29.5	19
202	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	144.4	93.1	53.3	41.6
203	Intel Arc A380	137	87	49	39
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Total War Pharaoh
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
222*	Intel Arc A310	111	73.6	41.6	32.3
223*	Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU	99.35ⁿ²	68.65ⁿ²	49.6ⁿ²	38.05ⁿ²
225*	Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU	95.5	56.8	35.6	28.1
241*	AMD Radeon 780M	88.7ⁿ⁶	67.1ⁿ⁶	48.95ⁿ⁶	40.8ⁿ⁶	22.1	10.6
242*	Apple M3 10-Core GPU	133ⁿ³	83ⁿ³	44ⁿ³	35ⁿ³	24
249	AMD Radeon 680M	72.4ⁿ³	62.5ⁿ³	48.4ⁿ³	43.6ⁿ³
316	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	64.2	46.8	33.5	29.1
317	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	67.9	44	23	18.4
334	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	45.6	28.2	16.4
337	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	44.6ⁿ²	32.25ⁿ²	22.1ⁿ²	22.4	16.8
381*	Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	39	25	13
382*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	36.5	26	13.6	11
419	Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)	27.1	19.9	13	11.4
420*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	41.1	30.5	19.5	17.7
421	Intel UHD Graphics 770	39.7	29.6	18.9	16.6
431*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	46.4	33.5	18.4	14.4
508	Intel Iris Graphics 550	23.2	14.3
511*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	40.5	31.9	21.3	18.8
584	Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	18.2	12.6	6.4
585	Intel UHD Graphics 630	16.4
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Total War Pharaoh
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
587*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	17.8	13.5
595	Intel UHD Graphics 620	15.8	10.5
668	AMD Radeon R5 M255	14.9
669*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 3	19.7	13.4
776	Intel HD Graphics 4400	9

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.