F1 24 评论：笔记本电脑和台式机基准测试

和以前一样吗？

众所周知，EA 每年都会对其运动系列进行精心调整。在本基准测试中，您可以了解《F1 24》是否也是如此，以及运行它需要哪些硬件。

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/06/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Laptop / Notebook Desktop Gamecheck

测试系统

华硕 TUF Gaming Advantage A16（RX 7600S 和 780M）

我们目前使用这些设备进行游戏基准测试。点击照片可进入相应制造商的网站。有关这些设备规格的更多详情，请参阅文章末尾。

技术

与去年的游戏-F1 23 版本相比（该版本也有一篇基准文章)--从技术角度来看，变化不大。即使到了 2024 年，由开发商 Codemasters 制作的 EGO 引擎看起来依然不错，但已不再能激发玩家的真正热情。其细腻而时尚的车辆看起来尤为出色。

游戏的图形菜单也与前作几乎完全相同。主选项卡中提供了 20 多个高级选项，所有这些选项都可以通过预设进行调整--这一点与前作相同。视频模式 "子菜单中隐藏了大量设置，除了分辨率和图像模式外，还包含 Vsync、帧速率限制、各向异性过滤和边缘平滑控制。Codemasters 为游戏提供了 TAA、DLSS、FSR 和 XeSS 支持，同时还加入了帧生成功能。此外，它还掌握了光线追踪技术，在选择超高级别时会自动激活。如果需要，还可以在 VR 模式下启动 F1 24。

太棒了：无需重启游戏即可应用所有更改。Codemasters 没有提供各个设置的对比图片，但会提供一些文字说明。

虽然现在底层技术已经成熟，但我们在测试过程中还是遇到了一些奇怪的问题。崩溃和错误信息时有发生，更改分辨率有时也不稳定。游戏启动时间也很长（部分原因是信息图表太多）。

基准

F1 24》继承了前作的综合基准，其中包括多条赛道、天气条件和摄像机角度。与去年类似，我们在澳大利亚赛道上使用了干燥、晴朗的天气和不断变化的摄像机。

在测量过程中，我们还可以选择显示帧频，最后会显示更详细的评估结果（见视频和截图）。我们认为该游戏在 40 帧/秒以上即可运行。

成果

全高清（1,920 x 1,080）

只要不使用光线追踪技术，《F1 24》对图形处理的要求就不会太高。入门级型号，如 iGPU Radeon 780M和英特尔 Arc 8等入门级 iGPU 有时足以在预设 "高 "下达到 1,920 x 1,080 像素。对于包括全高清光线追踪在内的超高设置，我们建议至少使用 RTX 4050，即中档显卡。

F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	522 (399^min) fps ∼100% 438 (364^min) fps ∼100% 164 (116^min) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Neo 16 E23	366 (280^min) fps ∼70% 328 (247^min) fps ∼75% 120 (77^min) fps ∼73%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	451 (314^min) fps ∼86% 393 (288^min) fps ∼90% 112 (63^min) fps ∼68%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX Razer Blade 16 Mid 23	283 (229^min) fps ∼54% 242 (178^min) fps ∼55% 96 (56^min) fps ∼59%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	255 (115^min) fps ∼49% 222 (146^min) fps ∼51% 72 (58^min) fps ∼44%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS Razer Blade 14 Mid 23	221 (188^min) fps ∼42% 177 (146^min) fps ∼40% 55 (40^min) fps ∼34%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H Medion Erazer Scout E20	195 (171^min) fps ∼37% 146 (126^min) fps ∼33% 45 (37^min) fps ∼27%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16	227 (197^min) fps ∼43% 170 (146^min) fps ∼39% 39 (28^min) fps ∼24%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Ultra 7 155H Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14	82 (68^min) fps ∼100% 74 (62^min) fps ∼14% 53 (43^min) fps ∼12% 14 (10^min) fps ∼9%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16	73 (51^min) fps ∼89% 65 (38^min) fps ∼12% 46 (26^min) fps ∼11%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

使用 QHD 显示屏时，您也不需要顶级机型。2560 x 1440 像素和最大细节的组合，使用 GeForce RTX 4070或更高配置即可流畅运行。

F1 24
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	110 (91^min) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Neo 16 E23	79 (63^min) fps ∼72%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	73 (52^min) fps ∼66%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX Razer Blade 16 Mid 23	65 (52^min) fps ∼59%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	46 (37^min) fps ∼42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS Razer Blade 14 Mid 23	36 (30^min) fps ∼33%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H Medion Erazer Scout E20	28 (22^min) fps ∼25%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16	24 (16^min) fps ∼22%

超高清（3,840 x 2,160）

4K 显示器是小麦和谷物的分界线。3,840 x 2,160 像素和超高预设值要求 Nvidia 当前的顶级性能，即 GeForce RTX 4090.值得庆幸的是，激活升频后效果会更好。RTX 4070 足以满足 4K 的 DLSS 画质要求。

F1 24
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x 3840x2160 Ultra High Preset + Quality DLSS AF:16x 3840x2160 Ultra High Preset + Quality FSR AF:16x
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	55 (44^min) fps ∼100% 96 (80^min) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Neo 16 E23	41 (33^min) fps ∼75% 69 (59^min) fps ∼72%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	37 (26^min) fps ∼67% 64 (47^min) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX Razer Blade 16 Mid 23	33 (26^min) fps ∼60% 54 (44^min) fps ∼56%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	22 (18^min) fps ∼40% 40 (33^min) fps ∼42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS Razer Blade 14 Mid 23	17 (14^min) fps ∼31% 31 (26^min) fps ∼32%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H Medion Erazer Scout E20	12 (10^min) fps ∼22% 18 (14^min) fps ∼19%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16	7 (5^min) fps ∼13% 11 (5^min) fps ∼17%

Overview

Test system details

笔记本电脑	显卡	处理器	内存
XMG Neo 16 E23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 @175 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6X)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 @175 W TGP (12 GB GDDR6X)	Intel Core i9-13950HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2 x 8 GB DDR5
Medion Erazer Scout E20	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 @100 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-13700H	2 x 8 GB DDR5
华硕 TUF Gaming Advantage A16	AMD Radeon RX 7600S (8 GB GDDR6) & AMD Radeon 780M	AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2 x 8 GB DDR5
联想 Yoga Pro 7 14	Intel Arc 8	Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2 x 16 GB DDR5

塔式电脑	显卡	处理器	内存
华硕 ROG Strix Z790-F	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 (16 GB GDDR6X) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900K	2 x 24 GB DDR5 G.Skill

4K 显示器	操作系统	Nvidia 驱动程序	AMD 驱动程序	Intel 驱动程序
Philips Evnia 329M1RV	Windows 11	555.85	24.5.1	101.5534

Please share our article, every link counts!

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 464 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 728114 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > F1 24 评论：笔记本电脑和台式机基准测试

Florian Glaser, 2024-06- 6 (Update: 2026-02-18)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > F1 24 (2024)
		low 1920x1080 Low Preset 16xAF TAA	med. 1920x1080 Medium Preset 16xAF TAA	high 1920x1080 High Preset 16xAF TAA	ultra 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA	QHD 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA	4K 3840x2160 Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.