测试中的Eldon Ring。笔记本和台式机基准测试

一款伟大游戏的PC移植版存在问题。 尽管《艾尔登环》在主机上可能很成功，但这个巨大的开放世界角色扮演游戏在PC上似乎一直被忽视，直到最近。尽管存在缺陷，我们还是在不同的分辨率和质量水平上进行了基准测试。

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/22/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Laptop / Notebook Desktop Gamecheck

技术

毫无疑问，《Elden Ring》是有史以来最好的角色扮演游戏之一，尽管它有一些小缺陷。然而，From Software在PC版发布时并没有给自己带来任何好处--这也是该开发商的典型做法。与其他灵魂游戏类似，第一批补丁（本文基于3月中旬的1.0.3版本）仍有几个问题，首先是在使用鼠标和键盘时只显示控制台按钮，这可能导致很多混乱的情况。

总的来说，控制（尤其是菜单，在可用性方面更好一些）是为使用游戏手柄而设计的，但这并不意味着你不能用鼠标和键盘来玩《Elden Ring》（例如，作者用它成功完成了《黑暗之魂3》）。

除了不太周全的控制方式，不幸的是，《Elden Ring》目前还有许多其他技术问题和缺陷。例如，PC玩家不仅面临着每秒60帧的固定FPS限制（目前只能通过MOD禁用），而且--无论使用的硬件和选择的设置如何--有时会出现或多或少的强烈抖动，这对游戏的玩法会产生非常不利的影响。

此外，偶尔会出现崩溃和图形错误（如隐藏的马）。埃尔登环的开始和结束在某些地方也需要很长的时间。此外，图片模式或分辨率的变化往往不能正确应用，所以你必须来回切换几次。

支持图形菜单：该标题在设置量方面的数字还算不错。虽然缺少V-Sync这样的经典设置，但高级选项仍然包含10多个质量控制，其中一些对视觉效果有很大影响。虽然最低设置看起来非常适中，但游戏从中等细节看起来还不错。

还有几个预设可用，方便地不需要重新启动。在最高水平上，图形质量被证明是坚实的，尽管与《黑暗之魂3》相比你几乎看不到任何改进。一些类型的代表作品在技术上要更进一步或更现代一些。一些买家会对纹理质量等方面感到失望。

然而，From Software在一定程度上用宏大和非常有个性的艺术风格弥补了技术上的局限性--老式的灵魂部分打招呼--。敌人的设计和世界的气氛几乎是无可匹敌的--它简直是非常出色。不仅仅是由于高植被密度、一天中变化的时间、郁郁葱葱的景色、不同的天气状况（雨、风等）以及可破坏的关卡元素，还有巨大的氛围。

如果你想第一次尝试类似灵魂或其他From Software的游戏，我们认为最好从《Elden Ring》开始。虽然你仍然要通过互联网搜索来学习很多东西，但它比它的精神前辈更适合初学者，而且有更好的移动处理（关键词：跳跃）。

基准

由于《Elden Ring》没有集成的基准，所以我们又采用了游戏中的序列来测量速度。正如你在下面的视频中所看到的，我们使用快速旅行来到达 "Elleh教堂"，你在开始游戏后不久就会到达那里，骑在马背上大约20秒就可以到达开始的地牢。

结果

对于基准，我们主要使用我们的合作伙伴XMG (Schenker Technologies)的租赁设备。和MSI被使用。

FHD (1,920 x 1,080)

如果排除奇怪的抽搐和经常出现的最低FPS差，《Elden Ring》的系统要求相对适中。虽然iGPU如英特尔Iris Xe很快就达到了它们的极限，中端型号如GeForce GTX 1650(Ti)也能在全高清状态下以超过40 FPS的平均水平运行高至最大设置。

Elden Ring
1920x1080 Low Preset 1920x1080 Medium Preset 1920x1080 High Preset 1920x1080 Maximum Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	59.1 (32.2^min, 35.1^P0.1, 41.9^P1) fps ∼42% 58.7 (31.5^min, 31.9^P0.1, 40.6^P1) fps ∼42% 58.7 (31.4^min, 32.2^P0.1, 40.7^P1) fps ∼47%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	59.2 (33.1^min, 38.1^P0.1, 43.5^P1) fps ∼42% 58.6 (32.5^min, 33.3^P0.1, 39.1^P1) fps ∼42% 58.6 (32^min, 34.1^P0.1, 39.9^P1) fps ∼47%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	59.3 (33.3^min, 37.2^P0.1, 44.9^P1) fps ∼42% 58.8 (28.9^min, 31.9^P0.1, 39.3^P1) fps ∼43% 58.6 (32.4^min, 33.3^P0.1, 38.4^P1) fps ∼47%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	59.7 (35.3^min, 38.7^P0.1, 48.5^P1) fps ∼42% 59.4 (35.7^min, 36.8^P0.1, 43.7^P1) fps ∼43% 59.3 (34.4^min, 36.2^P0.1, 42.2^P1) fps ∼48%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	59.5 (35^min, 37.7^P0.1, 45.4^P1) fps ∼42% 59.2 (34^min, 34.5^P0.1, 43.5^P1) fps ∼43% 59.1 (34.2^min, 35.8^P0.1, 42.8^P1) fps ∼48%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	59.5 (29.1^min, 34^P0.1, 47^P1) fps ∼42% 59.3 (35.6^min, 38.2^P0.1, 43.3^P1) fps ∼43% 59.1 (24^min, 35.4^P0.1, 43^P1) fps ∼48%
AMD Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK	58 (29.1^min, 29.8^P0.1, 33.5^P1) fps ∼41% 58 (28^min, 28.3^P0.1, 33.8^P1) fps ∼42% 57.8 (25.5^min, 27.2^P0.1, 33.2^P1) fps ∼47%
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX Asus ROG Strix G15	57.6 (27.2^min, 27.3^P0.1, 31.5^P1) fps ∼41% 57.5 (24.2^min, 25.7^P0.1, 32^P1) fps ∼42% 57.4 (24.3^min, 24.5^P0.1, 30.9^P1) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	58 (27.3^min, 30.4^P0.1, 37^P1) fps ∼41% 57.3 (29.9^min, 31.1^P0.1, 36^P1) fps ∼41% 56.9 (26.7^min, 28.4^P0.1, 33.6^P1) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	59.4 (31.3^min, 32.2^P0.1, 46.1^P1) fps ∼42% 58.7 (25.9^min, 26.5^P0.1, 40.6^P1) fps ∼42% 55.9 (23.4^min, 26.2^P0.1, 37.2^P1) fps ∼45%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	59.1 (33.8^min, 34.3^P0.1, 43.5^P1) fps ∼43% 58.8 (23.8^min, 34.7^P0.1, 43^P1) fps ∼41% 55.5 (25.3^min, 28.8^P0.1, 37.6^P1) fps ∼40% 46.9 (20^min, 22.8^P0.1, 31.4^P1) fps ∼38%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	58.3 (26^min, 30^P0.1, 38.5^P1) fps ∼43% 55.6 (19.9^min, 32.5^P0.1, 37^P1) fps ∼39% 50.5 (23.6^min, 23.7^P0.1, 33.8^P1) fps ∼37% 43.1 (21.6^min, 22.3^P0.1, 30.1^P1) fps ∼35%
AMD Radeon 680M, R9 6900HS Asus ROG Zephyrus G14	52.7 (22.3^min, 23.9^P0.1, 32.1^P1) fps ∼39% 41.5 (18.1^min, 19.8^P0.1, 27.8^P1) fps ∼29% 37.2 (18.8^min, 19.9^P0.1, 24.7^P1) fps ∼27% 31.5 (15.7^min, 15.9^P0.1, 20.9^P1) fps ∼25%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7 Honor MagicBook 14	23.7 (7.77^min, 8.73^P0.1, 14.1^P1) fps ∼17% 19.2 (6.6^min, 7.25^P0.1, 11.4^P1) fps ∼14% 18.8 (5.47^min, 6.04^P0.1, 10.5^P1) fps ∼14% 15.6 (5.17^min, 5.18^P0.1, 9.84^P1) fps ∼13%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

那些想在QHD显示屏上进行游戏的人需要一个来自中高档的代表。 2.560 x 1,440像素和最大的预设是可以玩的，从一个 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti或 RTX 3050 Ti.

Elden Ring
2560x1440 Maximum Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	59.3 (33.1^min, 35.3^P0.1, 42.6^P1) fps ∼43%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	59 (32.6^min, 34.9^P0.1, 41.8^P1) fps ∼42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	58.7 (31.3^min, 33^P0.1, 38.8^P1) fps ∼42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	58.6 (30^min, 32.2^P0.1, 39.3^P1) fps ∼42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	58.6 (29.9^min, 32.8^P0.1, 40^P1) fps ∼42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	58.5 (28.4^min, 29.4^P0.1, 38.5^P1) fps ∼42%
AMD Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK	57.8 (25.3^min, 29.3^P0.1, 35.9^P1) fps ∼42%
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX Asus ROG Strix G15	57 (20.8^min, 22.2^P0.1, 28.8^P1) fps ∼41%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	47.9 (11.3^min, 26.7^P0.1, 32.1^P1) fps ∼34%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	43.9 (17.6^min, 22.1^P0.1, 31.1^P1) fps ∼32%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	35.5 (21.6^min, 21.9^P0.1, 27.3^P1) fps ∼26%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	31.4 (15.8^min, 17.5^P0.1, 22.3^P1) fps ∼23%

UHD (3,840 x 2,160)

在UHD范围内，只有在使用最高预设时，你才会对高端GPU感到满意。根据我们的基准，一个超过40 FPS的平均值是可以用 Radeon RX 6800M.

Elden Ring
3840x2160 Maximum Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	58.4 (32.1^min, 32.9^P0.1, 36.9^P1) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	58.3 (31.3^min, 32.2^P0.1, 37.4^P1) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	57.1 (29.1^min, 29.2^P0.1, 36.9^P1) fps ∼45%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	50.7 (20.4^min, 28.5^P0.1, 37^P1) fps ∼40%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	48.1 (18.2^min, 20.7^P0.1, 34.5^P1) fps ∼38%
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX Asus ROG Strix G15	45.7 (22.2^min, 23^P0.1, 28.6^P1) fps ∼36%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	39.8 (20.4^min, 20.7^P0.1, 28^P1) fps ∼31%
AMD Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK	38.7 (20.3^min, 21.7^P0.1, 28.5^P1) fps ∼30%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	27.6 (17.1^min, 17.2^P0.1, 20.1^P1) fps ∼22%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	25.6 (12.3^min, 13.6^P0.1, 16.3^P1) fps ∼20%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	19.9 (15.4^min, 15.6^P0.1, 17.1^P1) fps ∼16%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	17.3 (7.92^min, 8.21^P0.1, 9.75^P1) fps ∼14%

注意事项

由于游戏测试非常耗时，而且经常受到安装或激活限制的限制，我们只能为您提供文章发表时的部分基准测试。更多的显卡将在未来几天和几周内加入。

Overview

Test systems

XMG Neo 15 (RTX 3080) - 点击照片，打开配置器 (bestware.com)

XMG Neo 17 (RTX 3070) - 点击照片，打开配置器 (bestware.com)

XMG Core 15 (RTX 3060) - 点击照片打开配置器 (bestware.com)

XMG Focus 17 (RTX 3050 Ti) - 点击照片打开配置器 (bestware.com)

设备	显卡	处理器	内存	操作系统
XMG Neo 15	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 @165 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 11
XMG Neo 17	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 11
XMG Core 15	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 @130 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 11
XMG Focus 17	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Ti @75 W TGP (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 11
微星GP65	NvidiaGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-9750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 11
微星GP75	NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650 Ti (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-10750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 11
微星GL75	NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-10750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 11
华硕ROG Strix G15	AMD Radeon RX 6800M（12 GB GDDR6）	AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 11
MSI Prestige 14 Evo	Intel Iris Xe (96 CUs)	Intel Core i7-1195G7	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 11
Honor MagicBook 14	Intel Iris Xe (96 CUs)	Intel Core i7-1165G7	1 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 11
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42	AMD Radeon Vega 7	AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	2 x 4 GB DDR4	Windows 11
台式电脑 I	MSIGeForce RTX 3090 (24 GB GDDR6X) MSIGeForce RTX 3080 (10 GB GDDR6X) MSIGeForce RTX 3070 (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-9900K	4 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 11
桌面-PC II	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3090 FE (24 GB GDDR6X) NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 (12 GB GDDR6X) Nvidia Titan RTX (24 GB GDDR6) NvidiaGeForce RTX 2070 Super (8 GB GDDR6) Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super (8 GB GDDR6) KFA2GeForce GTX 1660 Super (6 GB GDDR6) PNYGeForce GTX 1660 (6 GB GDDR5) KFA2GeForce GTX 1650 Super (4 GB GDDR6) KFA2GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR5)AMD GDDR5） AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT（12 GB DDR6） AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT（8 GB GDDR6） AMD Radeon RX 6600（8 GB GDDR6） AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT（8 GB GDDR6） AMDRadeon RX 5700 (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (6 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (8 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 5900X	2 x 32 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
桌面电脑III	NvidiaGeForce RTX 2080 Super FE	Intel Core i9-11900K	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 11

4K显示器	Nvidia驱动	AMD驱动
华硕PB287Q,飞利浦Brilliance 329P9H, 宏碁Predator XB321HK	ForceWare 511.79	Adrenalin 22.2.3

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 388744 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 测试中的Eldon Ring。笔记本和台式机基准测试

Florian Glaser, 2022-03-22 (Update: 2022-03-22)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > Elden Ring (2022)
Pos	Model	low 1920x1080 Low Preset	med. 1920x1080 Medium Preset	high 1920x1080 High Preset	ultra 1920x1080 Maximum Preset	QHD 2560x1440 Maximum Preset	4K 3840x2160 Maximum Preset
6	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	60ⁿ²	60ⁿ²	60ⁿ²	60ⁿ²	60ⁿ²	60ⁿ²
12	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	60	60	60	60	60	60
14	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	59.8	59.5ⁿ²	59.3ⁿ²	59.3ⁿ²	59.3ⁿ²	59.15ⁿ²
22	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU		59.9	59.8	59.8	59.6	59.3
24	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB	60	60	60	60	60	60
25	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080		59.2	58.6	58.6	58.6	58.3
30	AMD Radeon RX 6800	60	60	60	60	60	59.6
32	NVIDIA Titan RTX	59.9	59.9	59.7	59.9	59.9	59.6
36	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU				59.8	59	57.9
37	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		59.6	59.5	59.5	59.5	45
40	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070		59.3	58.8	58.6	58.5	57.1
43	AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT	60	60	60	60	60	50.5
44	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU		59.5	59.2	59.1	59	50.7
45	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	59.9	59.4	59.9	59.9	59.9	49.5
46	Intel Arc A770	60	60	60	60	60	50
50	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		59.8	59.85ⁿ²	53ⁿ²	59.7
53	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU				59.5
55	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop)					60	48.8
57	AMD Radeon RX 6800M		57.6	57.5	57.4	57	45.7
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Elden Ring
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
59	AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT	60	60	60	59.4	59.9	38.6
62	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU		59.7	59.4	59.3	59.3	48.1
64	AMD Radeon RX 6800S		58	58	57.8	57.8	38.7
67	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060	60	60	60	59.9	56.8	35.2
76	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	59.9	59.9	59.9	59.9ⁿ²	59.9	47.5
80	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)	59.9	59.9	59.9	59.9	59.7	42.1
84	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)	60	60	60	59.8	58.3	37.8
89	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		59.5	59.65ⁿ²	59.55ⁿ²	58.6	39.8
91	AMD Radeon RX 7600S		59.7	59.6	59.5	58.2	34.8
98	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)	59.9	59.9	59.7	59.9	59.8	56.9
100	AMD Radeon RX 6600	60	60	60	59.9	58.2	34
104	AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)	60	60	60	60	59.3	36.1
106	AMD Radeon RX 6600M		60	60	60
107	AMD Radeon RX 6700S		59.9	59.9	59.9	56.6
132	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050	60	60	60	60	51.6	31.1
134	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)	59.5	59.9	59.8	59.8	52.1	33.1
141	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)	59.9	59.9	59.9	58.4	47.5	28.2
142	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)	59.9	59.9	59.8	57.1	47	27.7
143	AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT	59.4	59.5	59.4	58	44	20.6
144	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)	59.8	59.6	56.5	46.8	34.7	22
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Elden Ring
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
148*	Intel Arc A730M		59.9	59.7	56.9	46.2
152	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		58	57.3	56.9	47.9	27.6
153	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		59.4ⁿ³	58.7ⁿ³	55.9ⁿ³	43.9	25.6
158	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)	59.9	59.8	59.5	54.9	41.8	24.3
161	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)	58.9	52.2	45	37.2	27.6	14.4
167	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU		48.7ⁿ²	46.95ⁿ²	45.3ⁿ²
186	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	58	56.9	54.2	48.4
187	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	59.1	58.8	55.5	46.9	35.5	19.9
189	AMD Radeon RX 5500M	37	35.8	35.2	35.2
198	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	50.1	43.1	39	34.9
202	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	58.3	55.6	50.5	43.1	31.4	17.3
219*	NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU	52.9	47	39.5	36.8
226*	NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU	52.4	45	39	29.9
247	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	35.7	31.4	25.9
249	AMD Radeon 680M	52.7	41.5	37.2	31.5
255*	NVIDIA GeForce MX450	31.5ⁿ²	25.25ⁿ²	23.85ⁿ²	20.95ⁿ²	13.5
270	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	42.65ⁿ²	36.3ⁿ²	31.5ⁿ²	26.15ⁿ²
283	AMD Radeon 660M	39.6	29.9	26.9
294	AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	39	35	29.9	25
316	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	34.6ⁿ²	30.35ⁿ²	26.2ⁿ²	21.75ⁿ²
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Elden Ring
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
317	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	22.6	21.2	14.8
326	AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)	14.5	11.5	9.32
334	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	21.4	11.2
336	NVIDIA GeForce MX150	23.2
337	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	24.05ⁿ²	17.1ⁿ²	14.35ⁿ²	13.3
359*	AMD Radeon 540X	15.9	12.2
380	Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)	35.5	29.1	24.7	20.3
381*	Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	15.5	12.7
382*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	19.05ⁿ²	16.05ⁿ²	15.2	13.3
418*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	18.5	14.8	13.6	11.2
420*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	18.3	14.9
421	Intel UHD Graphics 770	20.6	19	16
431*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	32ⁿ²	30.2ⁿ³	24.6ⁿ³	21ⁿ³	16.65ⁿ²	9.11ⁿ²
440	AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	22.5ⁿ²	18.95ⁿ²	16.5	13.9
461	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	13	12
511*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	16.7
584	Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	8.51
587*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	10.3
595	Intel UHD Graphics 620	6.29
807	Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)	5.18

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.