判决：箭湖-H 受制于戴尔的紧缩开支
戴尔 15 D15260 是一款经济实惠的生产力笔记本电脑。它的塑料结构不会让人眼前一亮，但其功能性和坚固性足以满足日常使用。
在性能方面，戴尔 15 D15260 的英特尔酷睿 5 225H 处理器可为日常工作或学习提供足够的动力。不过，戴尔的散热设计并没有让处理器充分发挥其性能。
不过，最令人失望的还是显示屏。戴尔依靠过时的面板来降低成本，其唯一真正的优点是没有 PWM 闪烁。对于一款 2026 年的设备来说，这款显示器的几乎所有其他方面都不尽如人意。
此外，还有其他一些问题，如单通道 DDR5 内存、不稳定的 Wi-Fi 连接和 41 瓦时的小电池。
由于缺少相应的接口，2.5 英寸 SATA 硬盘的空间显然被浪费了，这让我们不明白戴尔为什么不配备更大的电池。
总而言之，戴尔 15 D15260 的性能与其要价相当，因为它采用了 Arrow Lake-H 处理器。
如果戴尔没有偷工减料，它本可以成为一款更好的笔记本电脑。
Pros
+ 整体塑料结构
+ 足够的生产性能
+ 无 PWM 闪烁
+ 可承受的表面温度
+ 节能
Cons
- 底盘弹性大
- Wi-Fi 有时不可靠
- HDMI 输出仅限于 1080p 60 Hz
- 色彩不佳，响应时间长
- CPU 节流
- 只有一根 DDR5 内存条
价格和供应情况
配备 512 GB 固态硬盘的戴尔 15 D15260 目前在Dell India 上有售。售价为 78,390 ₹。这款笔记本电脑还可在美国亚马逊上购买，有酷睿Ultra 5和酷睿Ultra 7两个版本，起价740美元。
$739.99
Dell 15 Laptop D15260-15.6-inch FHD 60Hz 300 nits Display, Intel Core Ultra 5 Processor 225U, Intel Graphics, 16GB Memory, 512GB SSD, English US Backlit Keyboard AI Copilot Hotkey, Windows 11 Home
在此之前，戴尔提供的入门级 D15250 和 D15255 配备了 英特尔猛禽湖-U 酷睿 i7-1355U和 AMD Ryzen 5 Cezanne 7530U选项。
现在，戴尔 15 D15260 升级到了箭湖-H 代。戴尔在印度推出的这款产品配备了 Core Ultra 5 225H和 512 GB 固态硬盘，不过我们的评测机配备的是 1 TB 硬盘。
规格
Dell 15 D15260
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H 14c/14t, 4 x 4.9 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-Core, 8 x 4.3 GHz Intel Skymont E-Core, 2 x 2.3 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core, 55 W PL2 / Short Burst, 40 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-H
Graphics adapter
Intel Arc Graphics 130T, 32.0.101.8801
Memory
16 GB
, DDR5-5600 Single Channel, Timings: 46-45-45-90
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Arrow Lake-H PCH
Storage
Kioxia EG6 1024GB, 1024 GB
, 876 GB free
Weight
1.66 kg, Power Supply: 220 g
Price
740 USD
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
底盘不起眼的塑料结构
戴尔 15 是一款朴实无华的笔记本电脑，主要采用塑料结构，重 1.66 千克，在机盖和键盘面板上显示出相当大的弯曲度。
就价格而言，它的制造质量还算合格，只要不承受极端的物理压力，就能经受住日常使用的考验。不过，这款笔记本电脑没有通过单指开盖测试。
打开底部面板上的 8 颗 PH00 螺钉（其中两颗为固定螺钉）即可进入内部。WLAN 卡、内存和固态硬盘均可升级。
连接性快速但不可靠的 Wi-Fi 6
在连接性方面，戴尔 15 只提供了最基本的端口。没有 SD 读卡器，但有一个全功能 USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-C 端口。
HDMI 1.4 输出仅限于 1080p 60 Hz。
Realtek RTL8852BE WLAN 卡仅支持 Wi-Fi 6 80 MHz，但在与我们的参考产品华硕 RT-BE96U Wi-Fi 7 路由器进行测试时，吞吐量接近 1 Gbps，且没有明显的节流现象。
不过，在实际使用中，我们发现 Wi-Fi 经常断开并重新连接。戴尔需要通过更新驱动程序来解决这个问题。
Networking: iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | iperf3 receive AXE11000 | iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
| Networking / iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Average Realtek RTL8852BE (n=1) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (n=1last 2 years) | |
| Networking / iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Average Realtek RTL8852BE (n=1) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (n=1last 2 years) | |
| Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (606 - 1978, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Realtek RTL8852BE (536 - 943, n=70) | |
| Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (682 - 1818, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Realtek RTL8852BE (455 - 985, n=71) | |
| Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Multimedia (705 - 2373, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (700 - 2361, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Dell 15 D15260 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21: Ø898 (460-935)
Dell 15 D15260 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21: Ø996 (980-1009)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (802-867)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø923 (883-942)
网络摄像头
720p 网络摄像头偶尔进行视频通话还算合格。图像缺乏细节，色彩偏差较大。
30.1 ∆E
28 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
23 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
24 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
14 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
22 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
可持续性
据戴尔公司称，这款笔记本电脑的掌托和底盖使用了 30% 的消费后回收（PCR）塑料，适配器使用了 90% 的 PCR 塑料，而电池则由 90% 的还原钴制成。
包装主要由纸板制成，可完全回收利用。此外，戴尔 15 还符合 "能源之星 "标准，并通过了 Climate+ EPEAT Gold 认证。
输入设备背光效果良好的全尺寸键盘
全尺寸键盘采用两段式白色背光。在同类产品中，按键的行程足够长，因此打字不会感到吃力。键盘上没有专门的按键，但数字键盘上有一个调用计算器应用程序的专用键。
8 厘米 x 11.5 厘米的触摸板提供了不错的滑动体验，支持 Windows 精确手势。不过，只有触摸板的下半部分可以点击。
显示屏FHD 60 Hz 面板，色彩不佳，无 PWM
戴尔 15 采用的友达 B156HAN 面板类似于 戴尔 G15 5530但这种型号（AUO65B9）的刷新率仅限于 60 Hz，色彩也大不如前。
尽管如此，其亮度分布还是不错的，1440:1 的对比度也可以接受。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AUO B156HAN tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3
Maximum: 367 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 357.2 cd/m² Minimum: 23 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 359 cd/m²
Contrast: 1440:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.13 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
calibrated: 3.45
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
40.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
58.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
39.4% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
CCT: 6943 K
| Dell 15 D15260 AUO B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V SDC41B6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA NE160QDM-NX4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 144 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 LEN153WUXGA , IPS LED, 1920x1200, 15.3", 60 Hz | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K B160UAN04.3 (AUOA5AB), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 119% | 71% | -7% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 39.4 | 99.9 154% | 68.5 74% | 36.8 -7% | |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 58.9 | 100 70% | 98.3 67% | 55.3 -6% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 40.7 | 94.6 132% | 69.4 71% | 38 -7% | |
| Response Times | 48% | 5% | 17% | -6% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 34.14 ? | 4.8 ? 86% | 35.6 ? -4% | 28.2 ? 17% | 36 ? -5% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 20.08 ? | 18 ? 10% | 17.5 ? 13% | 16.8 ? 16% | 21.4 ? -7% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 481 | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 39 | ||||
| Screen | 197% | 8% | -56% | -42% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 360 | 425 18% | 413 15% | 328 -9% | 326 -9% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 357 | 421 18% | 408 14% | 315 -12% | 303 -15% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 95 | 98 3% | 94 -1% | 91 -4% | 89 -6% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.25 | 0.0219 91% | 0.2 20% | 0.29 -16% | 0.24 4% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1440 | 19406 1248% | 2065 43% | 1131 -21% | 1358 -6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.13 | 1.73 58% | 3.6 13% | 6.4 -55% | 6.48 -57% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.42 | 3.82 40% | 7.1 -11% | 21.5 -235% | 19.42 -202% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.45 | 1.5 57% | 4.92 -43% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 0.09 97% | 4.6 -77% | 5 -92% | 3.85 -48% |
| Gamma | 2.34 94% | 2.346 94% | 2.25 98% | 2.42 91% | 2.79 79% |
| CCT | 6943 94% | 6432 101% | 7461 87% | 6596 99% | 6739 96% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 121% /
156% | 28% /
21% | -20% /
-41% | -18% /
-30% |
* ... smaller is better
该面板只覆盖了 59% 的 sRGB 色域，导致色彩暗淡。
尽管我们使用 X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3 分光光度计和 Portrait Displays 的 Calman Ultimate 软件进行了校准，但由于戴尔 15 的色域覆盖范围不足，因此校准显示屏非常困难。
该面板难以准确再现光谱中 100% 的蓝色部分。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20.08 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.42 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.66 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34.14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.81 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.33 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  | |
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7822 (minimum: 1.31 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在所有测试亮度水平下，均未检测到 PWM 闪烁。
性能：削弱酷睿至尊 5 225H 的潜力
戴尔 15 D15260 主要配备了 英特尔酷睿5 225H处理器。美国买家还可获得 酷睿至尊 7 255H选项。
测试条件
我们通过戴尔优化器使用超高性能配置文件运行了所有基准测试，该配置文件支持 40 W PL1 / 55 W PL2。
处理器
虽然戴尔 15 的 Core Ultra 5 225H 的 55 W PL2 配置略高于 45 W PL2 华硕ExpertBook B5但 CPU 的整体性能仍要低 11%。
这很可能是由于戴尔 15 的散热效率较低，在 Cinebench R15 多核循环测试中分数的大幅波动就证明了这一点。
Cinebench R15 多核循环
Dell 15 D15260 Intel Core Ultra 5 225H: Ø1286 (753.07-2169.43)
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Intel Core Ultra 9 288V: Ø1497 (1473.84-1582.72)
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Intel Core Ultra 5 225H: Ø2342 (2293.31-2626.4)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100: Ø1411 (1363.23-1420.5)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K AMD Ryzen AI 7 350: Ø2019 (1940.52-2419.4)
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4861 - 33362, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (12793 - 16466, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (1946 - 1992, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1128 - 2459, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 12912, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (5084 - 6399, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (746 - 763, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (420 - 853, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (2169 - 2626, n=2) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (281 - 296, n=2) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (184.8 - 326, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (216 - 298, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Multimedia (100 - 557, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (29095 - 130368, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (40163 - 51720, n=2) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3666 - 7545, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (5687 - 5695, n=2) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Geekbench 6.6 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 29415, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (11132 - 13434, n=3) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Geekbench 6.6 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 4335, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (2678 - 2770, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4652 - 20422, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (10313 - 11570, n=2) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (1964 - 1987, n=2) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Multimedia (805 - 2974, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 36.1, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (13.4 - 18.5, n=2) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 146.7, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (48.5 - 49.1, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (0.4507 - 0.4622, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2214 - 50388, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (10784 - 18754, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12867 - 201874, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (55097 - 84588, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (653 - 8623, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (2680 - 4034, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (5287 - 6881, n=2) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6395 - 105740, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (28765 - 44411, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average of class Multimedia (13243 - 126790, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (45777 - 65057, n=2) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (167.2 - 2022, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (674 - 1032, n=2) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1014 - 26875, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (5728 - 9024, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12860 - 88154, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (25809 - 26133, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K (v6.92.6600) | |
系统性能
该设备类别的整体系统性能良好。不过，在 AIDA64 内存测试中，单通道 DDR5 配置显示出其局限性。
用户可能需要添加另一个 DDR5-5600 模块，以最大限度地提高性能。
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
| Performance rating | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 -4! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T (7069 - 8294, n=2) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4325 - 10386, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8025 - 11664, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T (10245 - 10249, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T (8873 - 15888, n=2) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7323 - 18233, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 16240, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T (9510 - 10548, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2728, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T (1648 - 1754, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2489, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T (1681 - 1740, n=2) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Multimedia (907 - 3465, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T (1664 - 1893, n=2) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2024, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T (1426 - 1509, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 596, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T (298 - 309, n=2) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T (290 - 294, n=2) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 402, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T (458 - 463, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (228 - 835, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21158 - 132135, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T (39904 - 47920, n=2) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average of class Multimedia (19699 - 174586, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T (43827 - 44496, n=2) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average of class Multimedia (17733 - 134998, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T (39183 - 39188, n=2) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 535, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T (113.5 - 115.7, n=2) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5531 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 8294 points | |
Help | ||
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 分析显示，最新 BIOS 1.1 版的 DPC 延迟很高。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average of class Multimedia (327 - 7067, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Kioxia EG6 1024 GB M.2 NVMe M.2 2230 固态硬盘具有不错的连续读/写性能。不过，它无法长时间保持这种速度。
没有额外的 M.2 扩展插槽。有安装 2.5 英寸 SATA 硬盘的空间，但没有提供连接器。
Kioxia EG6 1024GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
5667.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5301.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
510.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
505.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2962 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2160 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
68.36 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
199.6 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
438.1 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
938.3 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
Dell 15 D15260; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4234 (3232.76-5849.59)
图形处理器性能
弧形图形 Arc Graphics 130T在累积 3DMark 测试中，iGPU 的总体速度比 ExpertBook B5 的执行速度快 10%。
在 3DMark 总分上，它也比 Radeon 860M在 华硕 Vivobook 16.
Lunar Lake Arc Graphics 140V的 宏碁 Swift 16 AI的速度明显更快。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 9156 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 180947 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 26928 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4884 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2256 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2606 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 530 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2115 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 2125 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
戴尔 15 绝不是一款游戏笔记本，但 Arc Graphics 130T 可以在 1080p 中低设置下以可玩的帧速率运行旧版游戏。
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 -2! | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7.92 - 141.6, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7.61 - 144.4, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (13.3 - 303, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Average of class Multimedia (29 - 179.9, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
赛博朋克 2077》1080p 超帧频图
Dell 15 D15260 Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T: Ø14.7 (12.6-15.5)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 81.7 | 74.2 | 22.2 | 9.49 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 102.8 | 53 | 49 | 43 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 44 | 23.7 | 18.5 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 43.3 | 44 | 38.3 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 97.4 | 40 | 35 | 29.9 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 26.8 | 21.9 | 17.7 | 16 |
| F1 25 (2025) | 45.4 | 37.5 | 29.5 |
排放：热管-风扇组合独当一面
系统噪音
在超高性能模式下，无论负载如何，风扇噪音都保持在 47 dB(A)左右。
静音模式将负载情况下的风扇噪音水平限制在 40 dB(A) 或更低。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 27.6 / 27.6 / 27.6 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 47.2 / 47.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.5 dB(A) | ||
| Dell 15 D15260 Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Core Ultra 9 288V, Arc 140V | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 6% | 21% | 14% | 16% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 25.5 | 25.8 -1% | 23.2 9% | 24 6% | 23 10% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 27.6 | 25.8 7% | 23.2 16% | 24 13% | 23 17% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 27.6 | 25.8 7% | 23.2 16% | 24 13% | 23 17% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 27.6 | 26.7 3% | 23.2 16% | 24 13% | 24.67 11% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 47.2 | 26.3 44% | 31.72 33% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 47.5 | 44.4 7% | 35.4 25% | 33.3 30% | 41.53 13% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 47.4 | 41.1 13% | 38.8 18% | 42.7 10% | 42.51 10% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在负载情况下，上表面的温度是可以承受的，只有右下方有两个主要热点。
掌托始终保持相对凉爽。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+1.5 °C / 2.7 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+1.5 °C / 2.7 F).
| Dell 15 D15260 Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Core Ultra 9 288V, Arc 140V | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 9% | 3% | 6% | 2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 37.6 | 37.9 -1% | 40.7 -8% | 38.2 -2% | 48 -28% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 45.2 | 31.5 30% | 47.8 -6% | 39.2 13% | 51 -13% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 29.4 | 28.3 4% | 26 12% | 27.7 6% | 22 25% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 30.6 | 29.7 3% | 27 12% | 28.6 7% | 23 25% |
* ... smaller is better
| 压力 | CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度 (°C) |
| 系统空闲 | 1.5 | 800 | 48 | 45 |
| Prime95 | 2.6 | 800 | 72.8 | 60.7 |
| Prime95 + FurMark | 3.1 | 1,450 | 71.6 | 67.3 |
| 赛博朋克 2077 1080p Ultra | 2.7 | 2.1 | 66 | 64.6 |
发言人
内置立体声扬声器音效一般，没有低音。外接音频设备可通过 3.5 毫米组合音频插孔或蓝牙 5.2 连接。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell 15 D15260 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量：相对经济，电池寿命尚可
戴尔 15 在空闲和负载状态下的耗电量都很低，甚至比 ExperBook B5 更经济。
联想 联想 IdeaPad Slim 3配备了 骁龙 X1-26-100整体功耗降低了 22%。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.18 / 0.48 Watt |
| Idle | 3.58 / 7.19 / 8.89 Watt |
| Load |
42.1 / 65.9 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell 15 D15260 Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Core Ultra 9 288V, Arc 140V, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 15.3" | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Average Intel Arc Graphics 130T | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -17% | -24% | 22% | -34% | -9% | -52% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 3.58 | 5.7 -59% | 4.7 -31% | 2.4 33% | 4.7 -31% | 4.14 ? -16% | 5.67 ? -58% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 7.19 | 7.4 -3% | 9.7 -35% | 5.5 24% | 8.2 -14% | 8.45 ? -18% | 9.99 ? -39% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 8.89 | 7.9 11% | 10.1 -14% | 7.8 12% | 9 -1% | 9.5 ? -7% | 12.4 ? -39% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 42.1 | 44.2 -5% | 59 -40% | 43.2 ? -3% | 64.7 ? -54% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 37.4 | 49.8 -33% | 50.3 -34% | 29.9 20% | 65 -74% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 34.8 | 50.9 -46% | 18.8 46% | 58 -67% | |||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 65.9 | 65.41 1% | 69.6 -6% | 66.95 -2% | 74 -12% | 67.8 ? -3% | 112 ? -70% |
* ... smaller is better
耗电量：赛博朋克 2077 / 压力测试
Dell 15 D15260; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø43.8 (38-65.9)
Dell 15 D15260; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø6.99 (5.66-12.4)
Dell 15 D15260; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø37.4 (20.5-40.1)
耗电量：外部显示器
Dell 15 D15260; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø57 (56.2-57.8)
Dell 15 D15260; Cinebench R20 Single (external Monitor): Ø24.4 (19.8-35.6)
Dell 15 D15260; Cinebench R20 Multi (external Monitor): Ø44.1 (27.5-58)
Dell 15 D15260; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø23.4 (19-40.9)
Dell 15 D15260; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø42.8 (29.1-57.9)
Dell 15 D15260; Cinebench 2024 Single Power (external Monitor): Ø25.2 (19.3-41.6)
Dell 15 D15260; Cinebench 2024 Multi Power (external Monitor): Ø33.4 (29.7-59.3)
Dell 15 D15260; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø34.8 (32.3-37.4)
Dell 15 D15260; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.08 (2.59-6.1)
电池寿命
在我们以 150 尼特进行的 Wi-Fi 浏览测试中，41 瓦时电池提供了不错的运行时间。鉴于机身有足够的闲置空间，戴尔最好使用 60 Whr 电池。
| Dell 15 D15260 Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T, 41 Wh | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Core Ultra 9 288V, Arc 140V, 70 Wh | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T, 50 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, 60 Wh | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 42 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | ||||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 9.2 | 13.2 43% | 8.9 -3% | 19 107% | 6.8 -26% | 12 ? 30% |
Notebookcheck 对戴尔 15 D15260 的印象
戴尔 15 D15260 作为一款涵盖基本功能的日常笔记本电脑，表现还算不错，不过其显示屏和连接性还有待进一步改进。
Dell 15 D15260
- 05/27/2026 v8
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam
Multimedia - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dell 15 D15260 Intel Core Ultra 5 225H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130T ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $789.99 Dell 15 Laptop D15260-15.6-i... 2. $739.99 Dell 15 Laptop D15260-15.6-i... 3. $599.99 Dell 15 Laptop DC15250-15.6-... List Price: 740 USD | 1.7 kg | 18.99 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
2. 85.3%  | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Intel Core Ultra 9 288V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: | 1.5 kg | 15.95 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED |
3. 84.4%  | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Intel Core Ultra 5 225H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130T ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1300€ | 1.7 kg | 18 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
4. 81.9%  | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $399.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X1... 2. $469.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3X - 202... 3. $679.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X1... List Price: 710 Euro | 1.6 kg | 18.5 mm | 15.30" 1920x1200 148 PPI IPS LED |
5. 77.6%  | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,379.00 ASUS Vivobook S16 AI PC Lapt... 2. $707.52 ASUS Vivobook 16 Laptop, Cop... 3. $599.00 ASUS Vivobook 16 Laptop, 16�... | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
