Notebookcheck

戴尔G15 5515 Ryzen版回顾。一款经济实惠的FHD游戏笔记本

入门级别。 Ryzen 7 APU和GeForce RTX 3050 Ti笔记本GPU为G15的哑光FHD屏幕带来所有当前游戏的流畅性。这款笔记本电脑包括两个NVMe SSD的空间,并提供出色的电池寿命。只有显示屏不会赢得任何奖项。
Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AMD Cezanne (Zen 3) Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) Windows

通过G15 5515,戴尔在其产品组合中增加了一个来自入门级领域的游戏笔记本电脑。我们在这里测试的设备配置是由一台 Ryzen 7 5800HAPU和一个 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti笔记本GPU。竞争对手包括以下设备 申克XMG Focus 15,以及技嘉G5 KC,以及 联想Legion 5 15ACH.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Dell G15 5515
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 8 x 3.2 - 4.4 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU - 4096 MB, Core: 1695 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 90 W TDP, GDDR6, 30.0.14.7212, Optimus
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4-3200, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE092A, IPS, glossy: no, 120 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1, 512 GB 
, 401 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC3254
Connections
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: combined audio port, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 24.9 x 357.26 x 272.11
Battery
56 Wh, 4650 mAh Lithium-Ion, 3 cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, McAfee LiveSafe (trial), Microsoft 365 (trial), 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.43 kg, Power Supply: 567 g
Price
1099 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82.7 %
10/2021
Dell G15 5515
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2.4 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.4 %
09/2021
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.2 %
10/2021
Schenker XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.9 kg22 mm15.60"1920x1080
80.7 %
09/2021
Gigabyte G5 KC
i5-10500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg28 mm15.60"1920x1080

外壳 - G15有一个塑料外壳

G15的外壳没有提供任何高质量的材料,而是由塑料制成。虽然后面五分之一的基本单元保持了深灰色的色调,但其余五分之四和盖子的颜色是浅灰色。浅灰色区域有一些深灰色的色斑("幻影灰洒")。电池是内置的。取下机箱底部后,你可以进入内部。

箱子显示出一些良好的做工。缝隙是正确的,我们没有感觉到任何材料的突起或尖锐的边缘。底座和盖子的翘曲程度只是勉强可以接受。 对盖子背面的压力并没有导致图像的任何变化。铰链将盖子紧紧地固定在位置上,但仍然可以用一只手打开盖子。最大打开角度约为135度。

G15的占地面积在我们的比较领域中是最大的,而且该笔记本电脑也是较重的设备之一。这台 申克XMG Focus 15的结构明显更紧凑,重量也减少了500克(约17.6盎司)。

Size Comparison

363 mm 261 mm 26 mm 2.5 kg361 mm 258 mm 28 mm 2.1 kg357.26 mm 272.11 mm 24.9 mm 2.4 kg360 mm 238 mm 22 mm 1.9 kg

设备 - 戴尔G15不提供Thunderbolt技术。

G15提供三个USB-A连接(2个USB 2.0,1个USB 3.2 Gen 1;配备RTX 3060 GPU的型号。3x USB 3.2 Gen 1)和一个USB-C连接(USB 3.2 Gen 2),它通过USB-C支持DisplayPort。因此,与HDMI连接一起,有两个视频输出。你会徒劳地寻找一个存储卡读卡器。

这些连接分布在笔记本电脑的三个侧面。由于视频连接和电源端口被安置在后面,相应的电缆会朝后面跑,不会碍事。

右侧:2个USB 2.0 (A型)
右侧:2个USB 2.0 (A型)
左侧。千兆位以太网,音频组合端口
左侧。千兆位以太网,音频组合端口
背面。USB 3.2 Gen 2(C型,显示端口),USB 3.2 Gen 1(A型),HDMI,电源
背面。USB 3.2 Gen 2(C型,显示端口),USB 3.2 Gen 1(A型),HDMI,电源

沟通

Killer WLAN模块包含一个英特尔芯片(AX200),支持802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax标准。在最佳条件下(附近没有其他WLAN设备,笔记本电脑和服务器PC之间的距离很近)确定的传输率结果非常好。有线网络连接由Realtek公司的RTL8125千兆以太网控制器处理,它完成任务没有任何问题。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1530 (1393min - 1595max) MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1482 (759min - 1594max) MBit/s ∼97% +2%
Dell G15 5515
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1448 (759min - 1518max) MBit/s ∼95%
Average of class Gaming
  (496 - 1645, n=160, last 2 years)
1164 MBit/s ∼76% -20%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
  (554 - 1659, n=25)
1020 MBit/s ∼67% -30%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
561 (310min - 825max) MBit/s ∼37% -61%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Dell G15 5515
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1437 (1264min - 1567max) MBit/s ∼100%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1388 (695min - 1450max) MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1318 (667min - 1344max) MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=160, last 2 years)
1227 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
  (630 - 1885, n=25)
1037 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
828 (634min - 900max) MBit/s ∼58% -42%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550Tooltip
Dell G15 5515 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW); iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1436 (1264-1567)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø828 (634-900)
Schenker XMG Focus 15 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1295 (667-1344)
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1365 (695-1450)
Dell G15 5515 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW); iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1422 (759-1518)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø550 (310-825)
Schenker XMG Focus 15 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1457 (759-1594)
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1530 (1393-1595)

网络摄像头

0.9MP的网络摄像头创建的图像分辨率为1280 x 720像素。色彩的准确性有所欠缺,颜色与目标有很大偏差。

ColorChecker
24.3 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
18 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
23 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Schenker XMG Focus 15: 21.09 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 33.64 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.6 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
26 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Dell G15 5515: 19.95 ∆E min: 1.57 - max: 27.81 ∆E
ColorChecker
7.2 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Gigabyte G5 KC: 10.21 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 16.11 ∆E
ColorChecker
14.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
13 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
13 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
2 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL: 7.91 ∆E min: 0.69 - max: 14.34 ∆E

辅料

笔记本电脑包括通常的文件:快速启动手册和保修信息。

维护

在你卸下机箱底部的所有螺丝后,你可以用撬动工具来松开它,但有些部分固定得很紧。拆下机箱底部可以接触到SSD、WLAN模块、工作内存、电池和风扇。

戴尔G15的内部
戴尔G15的内部

担保

戴尔只为15.6英寸的笔记本电脑提供了一年的保修。将其延长到三年的高级支持将花费约150欧元(约174美元)。

输入设备 - 戴尔笔记本电脑包括键盘照明

键盘

戴尔为G15配备了包括数字块在内的带照明的Chiclet键盘。平坦的按键提供了一个中等的行程和一个清晰的压力点。键盘的阻力还可以。在打字时,键盘有一些最小的摆动,这不会造成任何烦扰。 回车键 "和方向键略小。两段式键盘照明是用一个功能键控制的。总的来说,该键盘适用于日常工作。

触摸板

一个尺寸为10.5 x 6厘米(约4.1 x 2.4英寸)的具有多点触摸功能的ClickPad作为鼠标的替代品。其光滑的表面使手指很容易滑动,而且它对角落里的输入也有反应。该垫子提供了一个短行程和清晰的压力点。

G15输入设备
G15输入设备

显示屏 - 一个120-Hz的IPS面板

15.6英寸显示屏(1920 x 1080像素)的低亮度(261.7 cd/m²)和对比度(772:1)无法给人留下深刻印象。我们认为亮度值高于300 cd/m²和对比度高于1.000:1是好的。虽然120-Hz面板提供了快速的响应时间,但它无法跟上竞争对手的数值,后者配备的是144或165-Hz面板。

在99%和更低的亮度水平下,显示屏闪烁的频率为200赫兹。由于这个频率相当低,这可能会导致一些敏感用户的头痛或眼睛问题。

276
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
241
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
235
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
237
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE092A
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 283 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 261.7 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 278 cd/m²
Contrast: 772:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.74 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 4.7
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
40.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.011
Dell G15 5515
BOE092A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
B156HAN12.H, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Schenker XMG Focus 15
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB5, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Gigabyte G5 KC
LM156LF-1F02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
68%
66%
72%
Display P3 Coverage
39.1
65.4
67%
64.6
65%
68.2
74%
sRGB Coverage
56.9
96.3
69%
95.3
67%
96.7
70%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
40.4
67.5
67%
66.5
65%
69.6
72%
Response Times
46%
39%
49%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
25.2 ?(12.4, 12.8)
13.6 ?(6.8, 6.8)
46%
18 ?(9.2, 8.8)
29%
10 ?(5.2, 4.8)
60%
Response Time Black / White *
16.8 ?(9.2, 7.6)
9.2 ?(4.4, 4.8)
45%
8.8 ?(3.6, 5.2)
48%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
38%
PWM Frequency
200 ?(99)
Screen
25%
39%
2%
Brightness middle
278
350
26%
418
50%
295
6%
Brightness
262
350
34%
376
44%
275
5%
Brightness Distribution
83
96
16%
83
0%
86
4%
Black Level *
0.36
0.3
17%
0.41
-14%
0.23
36%
Contrast
772
1167
51%
1020
32%
1283
66%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.74
3.9
32%
1.67
71%
5.21
9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
19.63
8.2
58%
3.88
80%
14.03
29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.7
1.6
66%
0.98
79%
1.73
63%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.1
5.5
-77%
2.9
6%
9.4
-203%
Gamma
2.011 109%
2.15 102%
2.26 97%
2.046 108%
CCT
6207 105%
7414 88%
6209 105%
8002 81%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
46% / 37%
48% / 44%
41% / 24%

* ... smaller is better

在交付状态下,该显示器呈现出体面的色彩再现,尽管颜色与目标略有偏差。它不存在蓝色色调的问题。校准只会带来色彩准确性的轻微改善。该显示器无法覆盖AdobeRGB(40%)、sRGB(57%)和DCI-P3(39%)色彩空间。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:饱和度
卡尔曼:饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
戴尔G15 5515与sRGB对比
戴尔G15 5515与sRGB对比
子像素网格
子像素网格
戴尔G15 5515 VS AdobeRGB
戴尔G15 5515 VS AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
25.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 12.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20897 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

IPS面板具有稳定的可视角度,可以从任何位置读取。在户外,只有在太阳光不太亮的情况下才能阅读显示屏。

G15的户外活动
G15的户外活动
视角
视角

性能 - Ryzen电源

通过G15 5515,戴尔提供了一个15.6英寸的游戏笔记本电脑,可以顺利地玩所有当前的游戏。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
系统信息

处理器

的CPU部分 锐龙7 5800HAPU(塞尚)由一个八核处理器组成,以3.2 GHz的基本时钟速度运行。该速度可以通过Turbo提高到4.3 GHz。支持同步多线程(每个核心运行两个线程)。

在短时间内,Cinebench R15基准的多线程测试以3.8 GHz的速度运行,然后时钟速度下降到3.5和3.6 GHz之间。单线程测试运行在3.3至4.2GHz。在电池运行时,CPU在多线程测试中运行在2.1至2.3GHz,在单线程测试中运行在2.1至3.4GHz。

联想Legion 5 15ACH也配备了Ryzen 7 5800H APU,在多线程应用中比G15略好。其原因在于联想允许 APU有更高的功率限制。

多线程(主电源操作
多线程(主电源操作
单线程(主电源运行)。
单线程(主电源运行)。

我们通过对Cinebench R15基准的多线程测试进行至少30分钟的持续循环,来评估CPU Turbo在主电源运行中是否也被持续使用。Turbo的使用达到了中等水平。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
Dell G15 5515 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1955 (1938.74-1967.83)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2123 (2107.59-2141.44)
Schenker XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1723 (1688.33-1770.15)
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H: Ø1133 (1111.57-1288.95)
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
229 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1968 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
135.98 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
 
82.4 pt ∼82%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
80.7 pt ∼81%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
79.1 pt ∼79%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
78.9 pt ∼79%
Average of class Gaming
 
74.4 pt ∼74%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
59.7 pt ∼60%
Cinebench R23
CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13028 Points ∼100% +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (8812 - 13214, n=22)
11960 Points ∼92% 0%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
11912 Points ∼91%
Average of class Gaming
  (4621 - 18288, n=110, last 2 years)
11037 Points ∼85% -7%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
10816 Points ∼83% -9%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
6820 Points ∼52% -43%
CPU (Single Core)
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1417 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1410 Points ∼100% 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1294 - 1441, n=22)
1410 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1095 - 1909, n=109, last 2 years)
1393 Points ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
1390 Points ∼98% -2%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
1161 Points ∼82% -18%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5020 Points ∼100% +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (3430 - 5020, n=24)
4626 Points ∼92% +1%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4588 Points ∼91%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
4307 Points ∼86% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 6849, n=199, last 2 years)
3907 Points ∼78% -15%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
2996 Points ∼60% -35%
CPU (Single Core)
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
554 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
550 Points ∼99% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (502 - 560, n=23)
549 Points ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
536 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 734, n=198, last 2 years)
513 Points ∼93% -7%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
450 Points ∼81% -19%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2119 Points ∼100% +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1487 - 2119, n=21)
1995 Points ∼94% +1%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1968 Points ∼93%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
1770 (1688.33min - 1770.15max) Points ∼84% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (536 - 2909, n=213, last 2 years)
1660 Points ∼78% -16%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
1289 (1111.57min - 1288.95max) Points ∼61% -35%
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (209 - 234, n=22)
229 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
225 Points ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
210 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (108 - 275, n=202, last 2 years)
208 Points ∼91% -9%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
188 Points ∼82% -18%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
389 Seconds * ∼100% -50%
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 555, n=194, last 2 years)
311 Seconds * ∼80% -20%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
278 Seconds * ∼71% -7%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
259 Seconds * ∼67%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (237 - 340, n=22)
256 Seconds * ∼66% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
239 Seconds * ∼61% +8%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (45773 - 59986, n=22)
54795 MIPS ∼100% +2%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53762 MIPS ∼98%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53239 MIPS ∼97% -1%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
47642 MIPS ∼87% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (15146 - 76063, n=195, last 2 years)
45814 MIPS ∼84% -15%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
33075 MIPS ∼60% -38%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5538 MIPS ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (5038 - 5632, n=22)
5492 MIPS ∼99% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5448 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2945 - 6506, n=195, last 2 years)
5279 MIPS ∼95% -5%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
5164 MIPS ∼93% -7%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
4897 MIPS ∼88% -12%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
9073 Points ∼100% +22%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (7392 - 9062, n=21)
7857 Points ∼87% +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7508 Points ∼83% +1%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7441 Points ∼82%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 13648, n=189, last 2 years)
7417 Points ∼82% 0%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
6332 Points ∼70% -15%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
6332 Points ∼70% -15%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
1480 Points ∼100% +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1462 Points ∼99% +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1347 - 1505, n=21)
1455 Points ∼98% 0%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1453 Points ∼98%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1918, n=189, last 2 years)
1348 Points ∼91% -7%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
1214 Points ∼82% -16%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
1214 Points ∼82% -16%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15 fps ∼100% +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (11.6 - 16.1, n=22)
14.7 fps ∼98% +3%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.3 fps ∼95%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
13.7 fps ∼91% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.13 - 19.9, n=194, last 2 years)
12.6 fps ∼84% -12%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
9.31 fps ∼62% -35%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
113 s * ∼100% -6%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
107 s * ∼95%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (47.4 - 113, n=22)
65.6 s * ∼58% +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 113, n=188, last 2 years)
54.3 s * ∼48% +49%
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
50.6 s * ∼45% +53%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.3 s * ∼42% +56%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Gigabyte G5 KC
Intel Core i5-10500H
0.645 sec * ∼100% -25%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.601 sec * ∼93% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.4252 - 1.088, n=190, last 2 years)
0.575 sec * ∼89% -11%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.539 sec * ∼84% -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (0.511 - 0.559, n=21)
0.524 sec * ∼81% -1%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.518 sec * ∼80%

* ... smaller is better

系统性能

该系统运行平稳而迅速,为所有通常的应用领域提供足够的计算能力。专用的GPU允许使用电脑游戏和其他GPU重的应用程序。这也伴随着非常好的PC Mark结果。

工作存储器以双通道模式运行。
工作存储器以双通道模式运行。
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4870 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5361 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5713 points
PCMark 10 Score
6098 points
Help
PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6648 Points ∼100% +9%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6478 Points ∼97% +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6098 - 6493, n=2)
6296 Points ∼95% +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (3952 - 8007, n=173, last 2 years)
6210 Points ∼93% +2%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
6098 Points ∼92%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
5968 Points ∼90% -2%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
10396 Points ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
10171 Points ∼98% +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9631 - 10213, n=2)
9922 Points ∼95% +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11064, n=172, last 2 years)
9693 Points ∼93% +1%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
9631 Points ∼93%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
8945 Points ∼86% -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9728 Points ∼100% +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8625 - 9199, n=2)
8912 Points ∼92% +3%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8639 Points ∼89% 0%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
8625 Points ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (5813 - 10100, n=172, last 2 years)
8412 Points ∼86% -2%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
7956 Points ∼82% -8%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Schenker XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8399 Points ∼100% +13%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
8106 Points ∼97% +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 12905, n=172, last 2 years)
8099 Points ∼96% +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
7884 Points ∼94% +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7408 - 7907, n=2)
7658 Points ∼91% +3%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
7408 Points ∼88%
Dell G15 5515
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte G5 KC
i5-10500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Memory Write
34820
32860
-6%
39449
13%
34405 ?(33990 - 34820, n=2)
-1%
40964 ?(17629 - 64282, n=147, last 2 years)
18%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Memory Read
43850
42436
-3%
40220
-8%
43746 ?(43641 - 43850, n=2)
0%
42054 ?(19654 - 65452, n=147, last 2 years)
-4%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Memory Latency *
78.3
81.1
-4%
57.5
27%
79 ?(78.3 - 79.7, n=2)
-1%
61.1 ?(69.7 - 103, n=169, last 2 years)
22%
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Memory Copy
38595
36925
-4%
35357
-8%
38305 ?(38015 - 38595, n=2)
-1%
38030 ?(18274 - 62554, n=147, last 2 years)
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-4% / -4%
6% / 6%
-1% / -1%
9% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

标准化的延迟监测测试(网络冲浪、4k视频再现、Prime95高负荷)在DPC延迟方面没有发现任何明显的问题。该系统似乎适用于视频和音频实时处理。这一声明涉及到我们的测试单元,其软件在我们测试时是有效的。未来的更新可能会带来一些改进,或使情况变得更糟。

延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
703 μs * ∼100% -9%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
647.6 μs * ∼92%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
563.9 μs * ∼80% +13%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
480 μs * ∼68% +26%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

三星的NVMe SSD(M.2 2230;M.2 2280型号也适用)作为系统驱动器。它提供512GB的存储空间,并提供良好的传输速率。笔记本电脑也能接受第二个NVMe固态硬盘(M.2 2230或M.2 2280)。

然而,我们的测试装置缺乏插入第二个固态硬盘(型号:0X8MY9)所需的夹具。这是一个可移动的螺纹,允许你固定和拧下M.2 SSD的背面。如果你需要这个螺纹,你需要向戴尔的支持部门了解是否有这个螺纹,或者我们也能从其他供应商,如亚马逊、易趣和阿里巴巴,找到这个零件。

一个NVMe SSD作为系统驱动器。
一个NVMe SSD作为系统驱动器。
有空间可以放置第二块NVMe SSD。
有空间可以放置第二块NVMe SSD。
拧下固态硬盘的夹具(0X8MY9)。
拧下固态硬盘的夹具(0X8MY9)。
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3113 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1553 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 502.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 374.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1765 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1235 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 119.9 MB/s
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
40%
69%
28%
12%
Write 4K
119.9
124.59
4%
238.3
99%
133.7
12%
145 ?(120 - 171, n=2)
21%
Read 4K
45.3
54.18
20%
55.6
23%
46.88
3%
49 ?(45.3 - 52.7, n=2)
8%
Write Seq
1235
2705.77
119%
3013
144%
2509
103%
1403 ?(1235 - 1571, n=2)
14%
Read Seq
1765
2297.9
30%
2879
63%
2209
25%
1887 ?(1765 - 2009, n=2)
7%
Write 4K Q32T1
374.3
499.66
33%
568.5
52%
373.7
0%
445 ?(374 - 516, n=2)
19%
Read 4K Q32T1
502.8
570.23
13%
714.8
42%
527.8
5%
587 ?(503 - 671, n=2)
17%
Write Seq Q32T1
1553
2998.9
93%
3287
112%
2511
62%
1736 ?(1553 - 1918, n=2)
12%
Read Seq Q32T1
3113
3460.5
11%
3561
14%
3440
11%
3114 ?(3113 - 3115, n=2)
0%
AS SSD
38%
58%
53%
8%
Seq Read
2554.76
2960
16%
2988.43
17%
2971.97
16%
2575 ?(2555 - 2596, n=2)
1%
Seq Write
1791.08
2586
44%
2541.48
42%
2276.2
27%
1819 ?(1791 - 1847, n=2)
2%
4K Read
37.8
46.84
24%
42.82
13%
55.74
47%
43 ?(37.8 - 48.1, n=2)
14%
4K Write
86.74
96.08
11%
87.02
0%
131.17
51%
117 ?(86.7 - 148, n=2)
35%
4K-64 Read
1272.65
854.08
-33%
2095.65
65%
1774.98
39%
1263 ?(1253 - 1273, n=2)
-1%
4K-64 Write
926.22
2015.02
118%
2455.47
165%
2051.35
121%
969 ?(926 - 1012, n=2)
5%
Access Time Read *
0.164
0.048
71%
0.068
59%
0.091
45%
0.1215 ?(0.079 - 0.164, n=2)
26%
Access Time Write *
0.044
0.094
-114%
0.043
2%
0.028
36%
0.035 ?(0.026 - 0.044, n=2)
20%
Score Read
1566
1197
-24%
2437
56%
2128
36%
1563 ?(1560 - 1566, n=2)
0%
Score Write
1192
2370
99%
2797
135%
2410
102%
1269 ?(1192 - 1345, n=2)
6%
Score Total
3522
4170
18%
6452
83%
5595
59%
3597 ?(3522 - 3672, n=2)
2%
Copy ISO MB/s
1898.94
2063.59
9%
1918 ?(1899 - 1938, n=2)
1%
Copy Program MB/s
281.63
872.94
210%
291 ?(282 - 301, n=2)
3%
Copy Game MB/s
854.26
1502.54
76%
845 ?(835 - 854, n=2)
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
39% / 39%
64% / 62%
41% / 42%
10% / 10%

* ... smaller is better

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
89.5 pt ∼90%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
86.4 pt ∼86%
Average of class Gaming
 
76.9 pt ∼77%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
72.4 pt ∼72%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
 
65.9 pt ∼66%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
59.6 pt ∼60%
DiskSpd
seq read
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2648 (2638.43min - 2648.49max) MB/s ∼100% +41%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2207 (2052.27min - 2206.83max) MB/s ∼83% +18%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
2179 (2114.52min - 2178.57max) MB/s ∼82% +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (170 - 4645, n=167, last 2 years)
2047 MB/s ∼77% +9%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (1873 - 2002, n=2)
1938 MB/s ∼73% +3%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1873 (1707.98min - 1872.94max) MB/s ∼71%
seq write
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2820 (2814.8min - 2820.25max) MB/s ∼100% +74%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2597 (2465.83min - 2597.11max) MB/s ∼92% +60%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
2511 (2505.49min - 2510.72max) MB/s ∼89% +55%
Average of class Gaming
  (174 - 4574, n=166, last 2 years)
2188 MB/s ∼78% +35%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (1620 - 1766, n=2)
1693 MB/s ∼60% +5%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1620 (1315.87min - 1620.14max) MB/s ∼57%
seq q8 t1 read
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
3554 (3305.84min - 3554.04max) MB/s ∼100% +20%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
3472 (3344.96min - 3471.81max) MB/s ∼98% +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 7090, n=167, last 2 years)
3279 MB/s ∼92% +10%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
3260 (2957.4min - 3260.02max) MB/s ∼92% +10%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (2971 - 3028, n=2)
3000 MB/s ∼84% +1%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
2971 (2662.21min - 2971.11max) MB/s ∼84%
seq q8 t1 write
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
3318 (3298.4min - 3318.4max) MB/s ∼100% +90%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2992 (2831.78min - 2991.8max) MB/s ∼90% +71%
Average of class Gaming
  (155 - 5969, n=167, last 2 years)
2636 MB/s ∼79% +51%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
2509 (2500.05min - 2509.05max) MB/s ∼76% +44%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (1745 - 1791, n=2)
1768 MB/s ∼53% +1%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1745 (1716.18min - 1745.18max) MB/s ∼53%
4k q1 t1 read
Average of class Gaming
  (0.53 - 137, n=167, last 2 years)
50.9 MB/s ∼100% +21%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (41.9 - 53.4, n=2)
47.7 MB/s ∼94% +14%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
47.3 (45.61min - 47.26max) MB/s ∼93% +13%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
42.3 (41.29min - 42.34max) MB/s ∼83% +1%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
42.1 (42min - 42.06max) MB/s ∼83% 0%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
41.9 (40.83min - 41.93max) MB/s ∼82%
4k q1 t1 write
Average of class Gaming
  (0.79 - 275, n=166, last 2 years)
146 MB/s ∼100% +40%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (104 - 183, n=2)
144 MB/s ∼99% +38%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
137 (137.12min - 137.44max) MB/s ∼94% +32%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
119 (118.14min - 119.03max) MB/s ∼82% +14%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
104 (103.47min - 103.94max) MB/s ∼71%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
93.4 (93.15min - 93.37max) MB/s ∼64% -10%
4k q32 t16 read
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
1887 (1882.56min - 1887.17max) MB/s ∼100% +39%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
1714 (1711.42min - 1713.54max) MB/s ∼91% +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.1 - 4198, n=166, last 2 years)
1522 MB/s ∼81% +12%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (1362 - 1390, n=2)
1376 MB/s ∼73% +1%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1362 (1077.22min - 1361.69max) MB/s ∼72%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
645 (600.09min - 644.91max) MB/s ∼34% -53%
4k q32 t16 write
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2668 (2657.73min - 2668.24max) MB/s ∼100% +147%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
2385 (2367.13min - 2384.72max) MB/s ∼89% +121%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1898 (1607.66min - 1897.67max) MB/s ∼71% +76%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.15 - 4249, n=166, last 2 years)
1577 MB/s ∼59% +46%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1078 (929.48min - 1077.95max) MB/s ∼40%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (1047 - 1078, n=2)
1063 MB/s ∼40% -1%
AS SSD
Score Total
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6452 Points ∼100% +83%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
5595 Points ∼87% +59%
Average of class Gaming
  (910 - 9134, n=164, last 2 years)
4591 Points ∼71% +30%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
4170 Points ∼65% +18%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (3522 - 3672, n=2)
3597 Points ∼56% +2%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
3522 Points ∼55%
Score Read
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2437 Points ∼100% +56%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
2128 Points ∼87% +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (389 - 3587, n=164, last 2 years)
1701 Points ∼70% +9%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1566 Points ∼64%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (1560 - 1566, n=2)
1563 Points ∼64% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1197 Points ∼49% -24%
Score Write
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2797 Points ∼100% +135%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
2410 Points ∼86% +102%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2370 Points ∼85% +99%
Average of class Gaming
  (285 - 4414, n=164, last 2 years)
2027 Points ∼72% +70%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (1192 - 1345, n=2)
1269 Points ∼45% +6%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1192 Points ∼43%
Seq Read
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2988.43 MB/s ∼100% +17%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
2971.97 MB/s ∼99% +16%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2960 MB/s ∼99% +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (252 - 5739, n=164, last 2 years)
2683 MB/s ∼90% +5%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (2555 - 2596, n=2)
2575 MB/s ∼86% +1%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
2554.76 MB/s ∼85%
Seq Write
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2586 MB/s ∼100% +44%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2541.48 MB/s ∼98% +42%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
2276.2 MB/s ∼88% +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (308 - 5210, n=164, last 2 years)
2176 MB/s ∼84% +21%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (1791 - 1847, n=2)
1819 MB/s ∼70% +2%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1791.08 MB/s ∼69%
4K Read
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
55.74 MB/s ∼100% +47%
Average of class Gaming
  (20 - 86.2, n=164, last 2 years)
50.1 MB/s ∼90% +33%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
46.84 MB/s ∼84% +24%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (37.8 - 48.1, n=2)
43 MB/s ∼77% +14%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
42.82 MB/s ∼77% +13%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
37.8 MB/s ∼68%
4K Write
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
131.17 MB/s ∼100% +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 261, n=164, last 2 years)
129 MB/s ∼98% +49%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (86.7 - 148, n=2)
117 MB/s ∼89% +35%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
96.08 MB/s ∼73% +11%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
87.02 MB/s ∼66% 0%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
86.74 MB/s ∼66%
4K-64 Read
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2095.65 MB/s ∼100% +65%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
1774.98 MB/s ∼85% +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (216 - 2959, n=164, last 2 years)
1383 MB/s ∼66% +9%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1272.65 MB/s ∼61%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (1253 - 1273, n=2)
1263 MB/s ∼60% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
854.08 MB/s ∼41% -33%
4K-64 Write
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2455.47 MB/s ∼100% +165%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
2051.35 MB/s ∼84% +121%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2015.02 MB/s ∼82% +118%
Average of class Gaming
  (94.1 - 3859, n=164, last 2 years)
1691 MB/s ∼69% +83%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (926 - 1012, n=2)
969 MB/s ∼39% +5%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
926.22 MB/s ∼38%
Access Time Read
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
0.164 ms * ∼100%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (0.079 - 0.164, n=2)
0.1215 ms * ∼74% +26%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
0.091 ms * ∼55% +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.018 - 0.23, n=157, last 2 years)
0.069 ms * ∼42% +58%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
0.068 ms * ∼41% +59%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
0.048 ms * ∼29% +71%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
0.094 ms * ∼100% -114%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.015 - 0.588, n=164, last 2 years)
0.0694 ms * ∼74% -58%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
0.044 ms * ∼47%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
0.043 ms * ∼46% +2%
Average Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
  (0.026 - 0.044, n=2)
0.035 ms * ∼37% +20%
Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
0.028 ms * ∼30% +36%

* ... smaller is better

Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

RTX 3000 GPU的实际性能取决于几个因素:冷却、存储设备,以及笔记本电脑制造商在Nvidia定义的限制范围内配置的最大TGP。戴尔已经配置了 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti笔记本GPU (所有RTX 3050 Ti笔记本电脑的概述,包括TGPs)的最大TGP为90瓦(80瓦+10瓦的动态提升)。然而,动态提升似乎用得很少或根本没有用--至少这是Witcher 3 测试所显示的。

3DMark的结果与以下产品处于同一水平 申克XMG Focus 15.这两款设备的结果都略高于RTX 3050 Ti的平均值。RTX 3050 Ti能够使用快速的GDDR6图形存储(4096 MB)。而 Vega 8集成在处理器中的图形核心是活跃的,而且笔记本电脑使用了Nvidia的Optimus图形切换解决方案。

Fire Strike (主电源操作
Fire Strike (主电源操作
Fire Strike (电池操作)
Fire Strike (电池操作)
Time Spy (主电源操作
Time Spy (主电源操作
3DMark 11 Performance
18252 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
123089 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
43639 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13232 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
6072 points
Help
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
100 pt ∼100%
Gigabyte G5 KC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
94 pt ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
 
90.3 pt ∼90%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
67.5 pt ∼68%
Dell G15 5515
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
64.7 pt ∼65%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
59.3 pt ∼59%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
29164 Points ∼100% +47%
Average of class Gaming
  (1925 - 45050, n=188, last 2 years)
27493 Points ∼94% +38%
Gigabyte G5 KC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
26654 Points ∼91% +34%
Dell G15 5515
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
19867 Points ∼68%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
19746 Points ∼68% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (15387 - 20905, n=10)
18526 Points ∼64% -7%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
127491 Points ∼100% +69%
Gigabyte G5 KC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
124701 Points ∼98% +65%
Average of class Gaming
  (23059 - 192950, n=158, last 2 years)
105768 Points ∼83% +40%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
91295 Points ∼72% +21%
Dell G15 5515
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
75563 Points ∼59%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (35820 - 91513, n=9)
66063 Points ∼52% -13%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21806 Points ∼100% +50%
Gigabyte G5 KC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21009 Points ∼96% +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (1360 - 34993, n=202, last 2 years)
20658 Points ∼95% +42%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
14696 Points ∼67% +1%
Dell G15 5515
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
14518 Points ∼67%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10288 - 14815, n=10)
13399 Points ∼61% -8%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8844 Points ∼100% +54%
Gigabyte G5 KC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7997 Points ∼90% +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (429 - 13324, n=206, last 2 years)
7897 Points ∼89% +37%
Dell G15 5515
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
5751 Points ∼65%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
5594 Points ∼63% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4591 - 6122, n=11)
5360 Points ∼61% -7%

游戏性能

笔记本电脑将当前所有的游戏顺利地带到屏幕上。一般来说,你可以选择全显示分辨率(1920 x 1080像素)和高至最高质量设置。像《赛博朋克2077》这样对性能要求很高的游戏需要在质量水平上做出一些妥协。在RTX 3050 Ti的比较中,帧率略低于平均水平。直接竞争者的数值,即XMG Focus 15的范围在同一水平。

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H
80.8 (64min) fps ∼100% +43%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.3 - 126, n=196, last 2 years)
79.5 fps ∼98% +40%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H (Ultra Performance)
71.5 (68min, 68P1 - 76max) fps ∼88% +26%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H (Auto)
67 (64min, 64P1 - 71max) fps ∼83% +18%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H (Eco)
62.8 (59min, 60P1 - 67max) fps ∼78% +11%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
56.6 (13.2min, 25.5P0.1, 43.4P1 - 105max) fps ∼70%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
56 (46min) fps ∼69% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (34.3 - 58.4, n=13)
48.4 fps ∼60% -14%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Schenker XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
145 (126.1min) fps ∼100% +32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (107 - 145, n=11)
121 fps ∼83% +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (22 - 158, n=179, last 2 years)
117 fps ∼81% +6%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H
115 (96.6min) fps ∼79% +5%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
110 (96.6min) fps ∼76%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
102 (89.6min) fps ∼70% -7%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Schenker XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
91.3 fps ∼100% +30%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H
78.1 fps ∼86% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (68.4 - 91.6, n=11)
76.2 fps ∼83% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.7 - 113, n=181, last 2 years)
75.7 fps ∼83% +7%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
70.5 fps ∼77%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
66.2 fps ∼73% -6%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (15.4 - 131, n=109, last 2 years)
81.6 fps ∼100% +48%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H (1.3)
78.9 fps ∼97% +43%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H (1.3)
78.5 fps ∼96% +43%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
57.1 (38min) fps ∼70% +4%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H (1.3)
55 fps ∼67%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (37.4 - 57.1, n=8)
50 fps ∼61% -9%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H
87.4 (4.5min, 58.8P1 - 167max) fps ∼100% +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (4.18 - 125, n=116, last 2 years)
85.2 fps ∼97% +19%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
81.3 (7.94min, 55.6P1 - 149max) fps ∼93% +13%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
74.5 (24.4min, 50P1 - 144max) fps ∼85% +4%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
71.8 (21.9min, 52.6P1 - 119max) fps ∼82%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (52.2 - 75.6, n=10)
68.1 fps ∼78% -5%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (10.9 - 221, n=97, last 2 years)
150 fps ∼100% +55%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
141 (49.1min, 106P1 - 218max) fps ∼94% +45%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
97 (70.7min, 76P1 - 145max) fps ∼65%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
96.4 (69.9min, 75.5P1 - 148max) fps ∼64% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (76.7 - 100, n=9)
91 fps ∼61% -6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 1920x1080 High Settings
Average of class Gaming
  (7.39 - 93.1, n=29, last 2 years)
56.5 fps ∼100% +11%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
50.8 (35.7min - 71.4max) fps ∼90%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
50.8 fps ∼90% 0%
F1 2021 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (14.2 - 157, n=29, last 2 years)
90.2 fps ∼100% +35%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H (803111)
80.2 (61min, 39P1 - 90max) fps ∼89% +20%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
67 fps ∼74% 0%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H (807588)
66.8 (55min, 54P1 - 79max) fps ∼74%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (46.8 - 69, n=6)
58.3 fps ∼65% -13%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H
104 fps ∼100% +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (12 - 146, n=102, last 2 years)
98.8 fps ∼95% +15%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
86 (76min) fps ∼83% 0%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
86 (75min - 100max) fps ∼83%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
80 fps ∼77% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (59 - 89, n=7)
76.1 fps ∼73% -12%
Dirt 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 117, n=36, last 2 years)
69.1 fps ∼100% +29%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
53.6 (39.8min, 42.7P0.1, 45.1P1 - 88.8max) fps ∼78%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (40.5 - 54.3, n=4)
50.4 fps ∼73% -6%
Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Medium Preset
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
81 fps ∼100% +78%
Gigabyte G5 KC
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H
76.7 fps ∼95% +68%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.5 - 121, n=27, last 2 years)
73.4 fps ∼91% +61%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
45.6 (21.7min, 32.2P0.1, 35.3P1 - 84.3max) fps ∼56%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (40.3 - 45.6, n=3)
42.7 fps ∼53% -6%
New World - 1920x1080 Very High Video Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (12.2 - 115, n=14, last 2 years)
70.7 fps ∼100% +35%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
52.2 (17.7min, 20.2P0.1, 30.7P1 - 93max) fps ∼74%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (45.1 - 52.2, n=3)
48.3 fps ∼68% -7%
Far Cry 6 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (17 - 114, n=12, last 2 years)
72 fps ∼100% +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (53 - 62, n=2)
57.5 fps ∼80% +8%
Dell G15 5515
G