结论 - 1000 美元内最佳 16 英寸敞篷车之一
与价格较低的Pavilion 系列相比,OmniBook X Flip 16 与旗舰产品 Spectre 系列的共同点更多。其光滑的金属设计、OLED 触摸屏和现代的 Lunar Lake 处理器在便携性和实用性之间取得了极好的平衡,尤其是与竞争对手 戴尔 16 Plus 2 合 1相比,戴尔 16 Plus 2 合 1 感觉更便宜。它的外形和 OLED 色彩适用于各种环境,从家庭多媒体到外出编辑--真正实现了 "全能 "的称号。
有些用户可能不会喜欢这种键盘与其他大多数惠普笔记本电脑不同的感觉,因此打字体验可能需要一些时间来适应。此外,原始性能会比许多 16 英寸蛤壳型笔记本电脑(如惠普自己的 Envy 16)慢,后者通常配备 H 系列处理器和独立显卡。强力用户可能会考虑 Spectre x360 16 系列以获得更强的编辑和游戏能力。对于其他人来说,OmniBook X Flip 16 是低价位 16 英寸可折叠笔记本电脑中最出色、功能最齐全的一款。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
惠普 OmniBook X Flip 16 是一款 16 英寸可折叠的专业消费类笔记本电脑,仅次于 Spectre x360 16 系列 在价格和功能方面仅次于 Spectre x360 16 系列。我们的测试机采用了更高端的配置,配备了酷睿Ultra 7 258V Lunar Lake英特尔处理器和3K 120 Hz OLED触摸屏,售价约为1300美元,促销时略低于1000美元。
该机型还有一个 AMD 变体,配备 Ryzen AI 5 340 和分辨率较低的 1200p 触摸屏,售价约为 700 美元。不过,目前所有英特尔配置都配备了 1800p 120 Hz OLED 触摸屏。
该领域的竞争对手包括其他 16 英寸消费类可折叠电脑,如 联想 Yoga 7 2-in-1 16, 三星Galaxy Book5 Pro 360或 戴尔 16 Plus 2-in-1.
更多惠普评论:
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 比戴尔更时尚
单色哑光金属设计比同价位的戴尔 16 Plus 2 合 1 感觉更坚固、更豪华。与价格更高的 Spectre x360 16 相比,它的弯曲度还是要大一些,而愿意多花几百美元的用户会发现,Spectre x360 16 的弯曲度更大。 三星Galaxy Book5 Pro 360是一个明显更轻的选择。
连接性
惠普包括戴尔 Plus 16 2 合 1 上的所有端口,另外还在左侧边缘增加了一个 USB-A 端口。需要注意的是,两个 USB-C 端口中只有一个支持 Thunderbolt 4 和 DisplayPort 2.1,而另一个 USB-C 端口仅支持 10 Gbps 的 DisplayPort 1.4。
交流
网络摄像头
500 万像素网络摄像头标配红外和物理快门。

可持续性
惠普在 OmniBook X Flip 16 的制造过程中采用了不同数量的可再生金属和塑料。
配件和保修
零售包装盒中除了常规的文件和 USB-C 交流适配器外,还包括一支有源触控笔 (TPA-M005P)。如果在美国购买,将享受制造商提供的一年有限保修服务。
输入设备
键盘
与目前的 Spectre 系列、EliteBook 系列和上一代 Envy 系列相比,零格键盘是一个变化。虽然键帽更大,但遗憾的是,与大多数其他惠普笔记本电脑上的传统键盘相比,反馈既轻又浅。
触摸板
点击板的大小与戴尔 16 Plus 2 合 1(13.5 x 8.7 厘米对 13.3 x 9 厘米)。与戴尔敞篷机相比,点击时所需的力道较小,因此比较轻松,但反馈偏软。
显示屏 - 3K 120 Hz OLED
OmniBook X Flip 16 采用了与 Book5 Pro 360 相似的 1800p 120 Hz 三星 OLED 触摸屏。 Galaxy Book5 Pro 360或 HP Spectre x360 16.与戴尔Plus 16 2合1或微星Summit A16 AI Plus的Mini-LED或IPS面板相比,它提供了更高的原始分辨率。 微星 Summit A16 AI Plus.如果使用 HDR 模式支持 HDR500,最大亮度可达 561 尼特,但如果使用 SDR 模式,亮度则限制在 381 尼特。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 381.1 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 0.9 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
95.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 Samsung SDC41BA, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 AU Optronics B160QAT, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 90 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 LEN160WUM, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 ATNA60CL09-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG AU Optronics B16QAN02.N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -0% | -53% | 0% | -5% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99.5 0% | 39.7 -60% | 99.9 0% | 96.8 -3% | 99.6 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 57.9 -42% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 95.2 | 94.2 -1% | 41 -57% | 96.6 1% | 84.7 -11% | 96.7 2% |
Response Times | -4178% | -3025% | -33% | -1201% | 3% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.8 ? | 48.8 ? -6000% | 30 ? -3650% | 0.48 ? 40% | 12.9 ? -1513% | 0.78 ? 2% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.9 ? | 57.6 ? -6300% | 22.5 ? -2400% | 0.64 ? 29% | 8.9 ? -889% | 0.86 ? 4% |
PWM Frequency | 473.8 ? | 2807 ? | 240 ? | 480 ? | ||
PWM Amplitude * | 15 | 50 -233% | 40 -167% | |||
Screen | -3% | -172% | 9% | -34% | -17% | |
Brightness middle | 381.1 | 432.1 13% | 317.9 -17% | 387 2% | 475.4 25% | 385.2 1% |
Brightness | 381 | 426 12% | 304 -20% | 392 3% | 440 15% | 387 2% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 97 -1% | 90 -8% | 98 0% | 89 -9% | 99 1% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.36 | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 1.95 41% | 7.39 -124% | 1 70% | 2.99 9% | 1.73 48% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.3 | 3.87 39% | 21.43 -240% | 1.9 70% | 7.64 -21% | 3.95 37% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.9 | 2 -122% | 6.5 -622% | 1.7 -89% | 2.9 -222% | 2.6 -189% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.3 96% | 2.22 99% | 2.25 98% | 2.31 95% | 2.17 101% |
CCT | 6369 102% | 6222 104% | 6140 106% | 6325 103% | 6472 100% | 6133 106% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.16 | 3.06 | 0.74 | |||
Contrast | 1272 | 1321 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1394% /
-1046% | -1083% /
-658% | -8% /
-3% | -413% /
-238% | -4% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise | |
↘ 0.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise | |
↘ 0.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 473.8 Hz Amplitude: 15 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 473.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 473.8 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8350 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 月亮湖效率
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。
处理器
酷睿 Ultra 7 258V 酷睿至尊 7 258V多线程性能与价格较低的 Core Ultra 5 125U.在循环运行 CineBench R15 xT 时,性能持续性也不错,不足率约为 10%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (8454 - 12781, n=18) | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (40875 - 63401, n=18) | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1930 - 2817, n=18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (49510 - 49818, n=18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (3817 - 4440, n=18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (21670 - 33565, n=18) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (30957 - 40753, n=18) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (422 - 632, n=18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4258 - 6930, n=18) | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (44223 - 54971, n=18) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
压力测试
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 39 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.9 | -- | 82 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 2.3 | 1300 | 74 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 1.3 | 1750 | 68 |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6265 - 7314, n=17) | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9295 - 11467, n=17) | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (7357 - 9619, n=17) | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9333 - 10074, n=17) | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1590 - 1742, n=16) | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1558 - 1684, n=16) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1727 - 1977, n=16) | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1251 - 1411, n=16) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (219 - 314, n=16) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (199.5 - 291, n=16) | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (468 - 559, n=18) | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7131 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (104408 - 114336, n=18) | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (82846 - 89417, n=18) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (109734 - 117935, n=18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (95 - 101.1, n=18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 |
* ... smaller is better
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
弧形图形 弧形图形 140V与上一代 Iris Xe 系列的速度提高了大约 15 弧 130V快了约 15%。但仍无法与惠普 Spectre x360 16 中的 Nvidia 独立 GPU 相比。 惠普 Spectre x360 16然而。
使用电池供电会降低多达 20% 的性能。
电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 9925 | 20155 | 3467 |
平衡模式 | 9910 (-0%) | 20635 (-0%) | 3466 (-0%) |
电池电量 | 8048 (-19%) | 16246 (-19%) | 2499 (-28%) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 12118 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 32872 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8940 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4313 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 834 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (54 - 99, n=21) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (49.2 - 87, n=21) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (34.4 - 66.4, n=22) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (15.8 - 22, n=20) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 97.2 | 88.4 | 63.5 | 84.9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 92.9 | 48.8 | 35.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 41.8 | 37.9 | 31.9 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 246 | 79.6 | 67.7 | 58.7 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 43 | 36.1 | 29.7 | 29.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 46.4 | 37.5 | 32.9 | 23.3 |
F1 24 (2024) | 91.9 | 83.9 | 64.6 | 20.9 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise Level
Idle |
| 28 / 28.3 / 28.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 37.7 / 37.6 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V | Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-512G-1101 | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 6% | 4% | 9% | -6% | 17% | |
off / environment * | 27.5 | 23.2 16% | 23.3 15% | 23.6 14% | 23.8 13% | 23.3 15% |
Idle Minimum * | 28 | 23 18% | 23.3 17% | 23.6 16% | 25 11% | 23.6 16% |
Idle Average * | 28.3 | 23 19% | 23.3 18% | 23.6 17% | 25 12% | 23.6 17% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.3 | 24.7 13% | 25.7 9% | 23.6 17% | 29.5 -4% | 23.6 17% |
Load Average * | 37.7 | 32.5 14% | 40.2 -7% | 29.4 22% | 37.5 1% | 29.2 23% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 36.2 | 42.6 -18% | 41.6 -15% | 40.6 -12% | 46.5 -28% | |
Load Maximum * | 37.6 | 45.6 -21% | 41.6 -11% | 40.6 -8% | 56.1 -49% | 32.1 15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 32.1 |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (+0.7 °C / 1.2 F).
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -20% | -4% | -3% | -22% | -11% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 38 | 44 -16% | 42.6 -12% | 40.9 -8% | 52.8 -39% | 39.6 -4% |
Maximum Bottom * | 39.4 | 39.4 -0% | 36.8 7% | 45.1 -14% | 42 -7% | 39.2 1% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25 | 31.8 -27% | 26.4 -6% | 23.8 5% | 30.6 -22% | 29 -16% |
Idle Bottom * | 25 | 34.2 -37% | 26.6 -6% | 23.5 6% | 29.6 -18% | 31.6 -26% |
* ... smaller is better
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
英特尔 Lunar Lake 的效率非常高,这在惠普上也是如此。例如,在运行《赛博朋克 2077》时,OmniBook X Flip 16 所需的电量比采用 AMD 处理器的 微星 Summit A16 AI Plus而帧速率却始终更快。不过,处理器的原始性能仍无法与 Ryzen AI 9 365 相比。
当 CPU 的利用率达到 100%时,我们可以通过小巧的(约 6.8 x 2.2 x 5.4 厘米)65 W USB-C 交流适配器记录到 65 W 的临时最大功耗。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, , OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, , Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-512G-1101, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -47% | -11% | -8% | -54% | -133% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.1 | 7 -126% | 4.2 -35% | 5.3 -71% | 5.4 -74% | 5.8 -87% |
Idle Average * | 4.4 | 13.2 -200% | 8.3 -89% | 6.7 -52% | 11 -150% | 12.3 -180% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.4 | 13.4 -18% | 9.5 17% | 7.3 36% | 11.2 2% | 33.9 -197% |
Load Average * | 38.3 | 43.9 -15% | 40.3 -5% | 37.6 2% | 76.6 -100% | 83.3 -117% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 48.7 | 40.7 16% | 40.8 16% | 42.8 12% | 49.2 -1% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 53.1 | 44.9 15% | 47.4 11% | 44.6 16% | 61.1 -15% | |
Load Maximum * | 64.9 | 67.8 -4% | 59 9% | 64.1 1% | 91.8 -41% | 120.8 -86% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 89.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 68 Wh | Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 64 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 70 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 76 Wh | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 82 Wh | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -31% | 57% | -16% | -29% | -14% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 767 | 533 -31% | 1202 57% | 646 -16% | 547 -29% | 660 -14% |
H.264 | 1181 | |||||
Load | 128 |
笔记本检查评级
HP OmniBook X Flip 16
- 07/10/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: $889.99 List Price: 950 USD | 1.9 kg | 15.5 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $1,084.99 Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 Laptop, ... 2. $1,699.99 2025 Dell 16 Plus 2-in-1 AI ... 3. $979.00 Dell 16 Plus Laptop DB16250-... List Price: 1500 USD | 2 kg | 16.99 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI Mini-LED | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $840.00 Lenovo Yoga 7i 2-in-1 Laptop... 2. $1,287.99 Lenovo Yoga 9i 2-in-1 Laptop... 3. $59.99 Laptop Case for Lenovo Yoga ... List Price: 1000 USD | 1.9 kg | 15.85 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,399.99 List Price: 1799€ | 1.7 kg | 12.8 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,316.99 List Price: 1600 USD | 2.1 kg | 16.85 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1600 USD | 2 kg | 19.8 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.