Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G52 MP2

ARM Mali-G52 MP2

ARM Mali-G52 MP2（或G52MC2）是用于基于ARM的SoC（主要是基于Android的）的中端集成显卡。它于20世纪20年代中期在联发科Helio G80中推出，时钟速度高达950MHz。

G52基于Bifrost架构，旨在用于主流手机。ARM声称，G52系列比ARM Mali G51系列的性能密度高30%，功率效率高15%。

在我们的基准测试中，G52MP2的性能（在Helio G80中）与Adreno 612和ARM Mali-G72 MP3相当（得益于G52MP2的高时钟速度）。

该GPU支持所有现代图形API，如OpenGL ES 3.2、Vulkan 1.0、OpenCL 2.0和Renderscript。

Mali-G Series

Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
ArchitectureBifrost
Pipelines2 - unified
Core Speed950 (Boost) MHz
CacheL2: 128 KB
Shared Memoryno
technology12 nm
FeaturesOpenGL® ES 1.1, 2.0, 3.1, 3.2 Vulkan 1.0 OpenCL™ 1.1, 1.2, 2.0 Full Profile, RenderScript
Date of Announcement06.03.2018
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G52 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek Helio P658 x 2000 MHz820 MHz? MHz
UNISOC T6188 x 2000 MHz850 MHz? MHz
UNISOC T6108 x 1800 MHz614 MHz? MHz
» show 7 more
min. - max.? - 850 MHz? - 1000 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 22232     avg: 24576     median: 25142 (3%)     max: 27034 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1595     avg: 1884     median: 1837 (10%)     max: 2243 Points
+ 28 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1464     avg: 1739     median: 1688.5 (4%)     max: 2069 Points
+ 28 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 596     avg: 1351     median: 1393 (9%)     max: 1569 Points
+ 41 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 530     avg: 1204     median: 1234 (5%)     max: 1875 Points
+ 41 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
ARM Mali-T720
91.7 -92%
...
Qualcomm Adreno 508
797 -34%
ARM Mali-T880 MP4
816 -32%
Qualcomm Adreno 509
841 -30%
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
857 -29%
ARM Mali-G57 MP1
863 -28%
Qualcomm Adreno 510
867 -28%
Qualcomm Adreno 612
1030 -14%
Qualcomm Adreno 610
1040 -14%
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
1147 -5%
ARM Mali-G52 MP2
1204
Qualcomm Adreno 418
1207 0%
Qualcomm Adreno 512
1237 3%
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
1251 4%
PowerVR GM9446
1470 22%
Qualcomm Adreno 430
1777 48%
Qualcomm Adreno 616
1825 52%
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
1957 63%
Qualcomm Adreno 619L
2154 79%
ARM Mali-T880 MP12
2326 93%
...
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
25707 2035%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 289     avg: 690     median: 713.5 (0%)     max: 757 Points
+ 36 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 72     avg: 173.9     median: 180 (0%)     max: 191 Points
+ 34 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.6     avg: 1.4     median: 1.5 (1%)     max: 1.6 fps
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 1.4     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (1%)     max: 4.1 fps
+ 44 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
PowerVR GE8100
0.314 -91%
...
Qualcomm Adreno 508
1.825 -45%
ARM Mali-G57 MP1
2.054 -38%
ARM Mali-G52 MP1
2.113 -36%
Qualcomm Adreno 509
2.356 -29%
ARM Mali-T880 MP4
2.467 -26%
Qualcomm Adreno 610
2.785 -16%
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
2.913 -12%
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
3.081 -7%
Qualcomm Adreno 512
3.167 -5%
ARM Mali-G52 MP2
3.325
PowerVR GM9446
3.5 5%
Qualcomm Adreno 612
3.56 7%
Qualcomm Adreno 616
5.225 57%
PowerVR GXA6850
5.3 59%
ARM Mali-G57 MP2
5.542 67%
Qualcomm Adreno 619L
5.8 74%
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
5.85 76%
ARM Mali-G57 MP3
6.9 108%
IMG BXM-8-256
6.933 109%
...
Apple M3 10-Core GPU
121 3539%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
536 16020%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 3.9     avg: 9     median: 9.2 (1%)     max: 11 fps
+ 44 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 3.8     avg: 8.7     median: 9.2 (1%)     max: 13 fps
+ 33 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 6.4     avg: 14.2     median: 15 (0%)     max: 16 fps
+ 33 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 1     avg: 22.7     median: 24.5 (1%)     max: 27 fps
+ 34 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 18     avg: 40.9     median: 43 (0%)     max: 46 fps
+ 33 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 15389     avg: 39775     median: 38270 (5%)     max: 60674 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 12.07     avg: 16.4     median: 17.4 (0%)     max: 18.05 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
529 points (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
997 points (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 12281     avg: 20861     median: 22840 (23%)     max: 25138 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 14908     avg: 16129     median: 15593.5 (27%)     max: 18264 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 4.3     median: 4.2 (2%)     max: 7.73 Watt
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01234567Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra Ultra
30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
30 30 44 53 53 56 57 57 57 60 61 67 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
30 30 30 35 38 38 39 39 39 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
19 29 30 30 30 34 39 40 40 40 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
17 20 28 29 29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
ultra
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
52.5 59 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
28 29 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
24 27 30 30 30 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
53  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
Armajet52
PUBG Mobile373329
Arena of Valor30
Dead Trigger 258
Asphalt 9: Legends2928
Real Racing 353
Temple Run 260
Subway Surfers60
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		1
2


1

2
3
2

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 29. 03:56:48

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 Nov 2023 18:38:08 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.04s ... 0.041s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#22 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#23 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#24 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#25 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#26 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#27 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#28 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#29 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#30 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#31 composed specs +0s ... 0.041s

#32 did output specs +0s ... 0.042s

#33 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.042s

#34 getting avg benchmarks for device 10399 +0.017s ... 0.058s

#35 got single benchmarks 10399 +0.119s ... 0.177s

#36 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.177s

#37 min, max, avg, median took s +0.332s ... 0.509s

#38 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.509s

#39 Got 86 rows for game benchmarks. +0.03s ... 0.539s

#40 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.539s

#41 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.543s

#42 benchmarks composed for output. +0.15s ... 0.693s

#43 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 0.696s

#44 return log +0s ... 0.696s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-G52 MP2 graphics card

Tecno Spark 10 Pro

Tecno Spark 10 Pro 智能手机评测--150 美元手机中的高分辨率自拍相机

Tecno Mobile Spark 10 Pro 是一款经济实惠的中端手机，配备 3200 万像素自拍摄像头，主要面向社交媒体爱好者。在这篇评测中，我们将对这款售价约 150 美元的手机进行更深入的了解。...
Mediatek Helio G88 | ARM Mali-G52 MP2 | 6.80" | 206 g
联想智能纸

联想 Smart Paper 评测--稳定金属外壳中的电子墨水平板电脑

Smart Paper 是联想公司生产的一款高品质电子墨水平板电脑，你可以用它来轻松记笔记，帮助你学习文件而不会感到疲倦。虽然该设备基于Android ，但你几乎无法在上面运行任何应用程序。在这篇评测中，我们将了解这款平板电脑能做什么，不能做什么。...
Rockchip RK3566 | ARM Mali-G52 MP2 | 10.30" | 408 g
小米红米 12

小米红米 12 智能手机评测--不足 200 美元的灵活相机系统

小米红米 12 是一款价格低廉的中端手机，具有防水功能和良好的日常性能。它的亮点之一是配备了广角镜头和微距镜头的摄像头，但这款售价不到 200 美元的手机真的能拍出出色的照片吗？...
Mediatek Helio G88 | ARM Mali-G52 MP2 | 6.79" | 198.5 g
realme C55

Realme C55 智能手机评测--运行时间长、充电快

制造商宣传 realme C55 拥有高品质摄像头和大容量内存，但这款中端手机也必须面对强大的竞争对手。它能否在测试中脱颖而出，我们将拭目以待。...
Mediatek Helio G88 | ARM Mali-G52 MP2 | 6.72" | 189.5 g
三星Galaxy A14 LTE 智能手机评测--这是升级吗？

三星Galaxy A14 LTE 智能手机评测--这是升级吗？

Galaxy A14 是三星 A 系列的入门机型。我们测试的是配备 4G 和 64 GB 存储空间的基本机型。即使是最小的 "A "智能手机，也会产生Galaxy 的感觉，还是设备已经过时？...
Mediatek Helio G80 | ARM Mali-G52 MP2 | 6.60" | 201 g

Honor X8a: Mediatek Helio G88, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Honor X8a评测--拥有100MP摄像头和全高清屏幕的智能手机

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022: UNISOC T618, 10.40", 0.5 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022平板电脑评测--更新后的电池寿命得到改善

Xiaomi Redmi 12C: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.71", 0.2 kg
  Review » 小米红米12C智能手机评测--速度快，但在某些方面过时了

Motorola Moto G13: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Moto G13评测--带NFC的经济实惠的智能手机

Motorola Moto G23: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Moto G23智能手机评测--为中端产品提供充足的内存

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3: UNISOC T610, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  Review » 联想Tab M10 2022（第三代）平板电脑评测--采用金属底盘的轻量级预算设备

Lenovo Tab M9: Mediatek Helio G80, 9.00", 0.3 kg
  Review » 联想Tab M9回顾。中等尺寸的平板电脑，带有GPS追踪功能

Blackview Tab 13: Mediatek Helio G85, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  Review » Blackview Tab 13评测--4G平板电脑有很多配件和恼人的应用程序

Cubot KingKong Mini 3: Mediatek Helio G85, 4.50", 0.1 kg
  Review » Cubot KingKong Mini 3评测 - 具有可靠品质的紧凑型智能手机

Amazon Fire HD 8 2022: MediaTek MT8169A, 8.00", 0.3 kg
  Review » 亚马逊Fire HD 8（2022）平板电脑评论--在一个方面与Apple iPad Mini相当

Amazon Fire HD 8 Kids 2022: MediaTek MT8169A, 8.00", 0.5 kg
  Review » 亚马逊Fire HD 8 Kids 2022和Kids Pro 2022评测--经济实惠的儿童平板电脑，带家长控制功能

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy A13 4G A137F智能手机评测--有了联发科就更好了

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3: Mediatek Helio G80, 10.61", 0.5 kg
  Review » 联想Tab M10 Plus 2022（第三代）评论。经济实惠的平板电脑，配有2K显示屏和手写笔支持

Motorola Moto G41: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Moto G41评测--带OIS和750尼特的OLED智能手机，价格很高

Teclast T40 Pro: UNISOC T618, 10.36", 0.5 kg
  Review » Teclast T40 Pro评测--带LTE的经济型平板电脑

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022: UNISOC T618, 10.50", 0.5 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy Tab A8 LTE (2022)平板电脑评测 - 一个强大的全能型产品，价格明显低于300美元

Samsung Galaxy M32: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy M32 4G智能手机评测--不到300欧元（约345美元）的明亮90Hz屏幕

Alldocube iPlay 40H: UNISOC T618, 10.40", 0.4 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy Tab A7的替代品。Alldocube iPlay 40H 10.4平板电脑评论

Realme C25Y: UNISOC T610, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » realme C25Y智能手机评测 - 廉价的快速充电手机，有温度问题

Motorola Moto G31: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Moto G31智能手机评论。以牺牲一些功能为代价的OLED显示屏

Vivo Y21s: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  Review » vivo Y21s智能手机评测--超薄、轻量、快速充电

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  Review » 小米Redmi Note 8 2021评论。有问题的智能手机刷新为推荐？

Gigaset GS5: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  Review » Gigaset GS5评论 - 温和的升级，在德国的智能手机

Samsung Galaxy M22: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy M22 智能手机评测--90Hz屏幕救场？

Nokia T20: UNISOC T610, 10.40", 0.5 kg
  Review » 诺基亚T20平板电脑评测--带LTE的平板电脑经久耐用

Realme Pad: Mediatek Helio G80, 10.40", 0.4 kg
  Review » realme Pad平板电脑评测--拥有大量内存的廉价替代品

Motorola Moto E40: UNISOC Tangula T700, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Moto E40智能手机评测--花钱少，滚动流畅

Teclast T40 Plus: UNISOC T618, 10.40", 0.5 kg
  Review » Teclast T40 Plus。经济实惠的LTE平板电脑评测

Xiaomi Redmi 10: Mediatek Helio G88, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » 小米红米10智能手机评论。具有NFC和90赫兹的良好预算手机

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy A22 4G智能手机评测 - AMOLED在没有5G的中端智能手机中的应用

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  Review » 红米Note 9智能手机评测：有着6400万四摄的红米9

Realme C3: Mediatek Helio G70, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Realme C3智能手机评测：底价的诱惑

Samsung Galaxy A05: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A05

Vivo Y17s: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y17s

Oppo A38: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A38

Asus Chromebook Flip CM1402FM2A: unknown, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook Flip CM1402FM2A

Infinix Note 30i: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.66", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Note 30i

Blackview Tab 15 Pro: UNISOC T610, 10.50", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Blackview Tab 15 Pro

Lenovo Ideapad Slim 3 Chromebook 14: unknown, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad Slim 3 Chromebook 14

Xiaomi Redmi 12: Mediatek Helio G88, 6.79", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi 12

Motorola Moto G Stylus 2023: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Stylus 2023

Infinix Hot 30: Mediatek Helio G88, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Hot 30

Doro Tablet: UNISOC T618, 10.40", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Doro Tablet

Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A14 4G

Realme Narzo N55: Mediatek Helio G88, 6.72", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Narzo N55

Umidigi G1 Max: UNISOC T610, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Umidigi G1 Max

Xiaomi Poco C55: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.71", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco C55

Blackview Oscal S80: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.58", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Blackview Oscal S80

Honor X8a: Mediatek Helio G88, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X8a

Realme C55: Mediatek Helio G88, 6.72", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme C55

Volla Phone 22: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Volla Phone 22

Motorola Moto G23: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G23

Motorola Moto G13: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G13

Alldocube iPlay 50: UNISOC T618, 10.40", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Alldocube iPlay 50

Xiaomi Redmi 12C: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.71", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi 12C

Lenovo Tab M9: Mediatek Helio G80, 9.00", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Tab M9

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022: UNISOC T618, 10.40", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022)

Blackview BV7200: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.10", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Blackview BV7200

Cubot Pocket 3: Mediatek Helio G85, 4.50", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Cubot Pocket 3

Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F

Cubot KingKong Mini 3: Mediatek Helio G85, 4.50", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Cubot KingKong Mini 3

Blackview Tab 15: UNISOC T610, 10.50", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Blackview Tab 15

ZTE Axon 40 SE: UNISOC T618, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Axon 40 SE

Infinix Hot 20: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.82", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Hot 20

ZTE Blade V40s: UNISOC T618, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Blade V40s

Amazon Fire HD 8 Kids 2022: MediaTek MT8169A, 8.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Amazon Fire HD 8 Kids 2022

Honor Pad X8: unknown, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Honor Pad X8

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3: UNISOC T610, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3

Amazon Fire HD 8 2022: MediaTek MT8169A, 8.00", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Amazon Fire HD 8 2022

Blackview BV7100: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.58", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Blackview BV7100

ZTE Blade V40: UNISOC T618, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Blade V40

Vivo Y22: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y22

Blackview Tab 13: Mediatek Helio G85, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Blackview Tab 13

Gigaset GS5 Lite: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Gigaset GS5 Lite

ZTE Blade V40 Pro: UNISOC T618, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Blade V40 Pro

Umidigi A13: UNISOC T610, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Umidigi A13

Xiaomi Redmi 10 Prime 2022: Mediatek Helio G88, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi 10 Prime 2022

Infinix Hot 12 Play: UNISOC T610, 6.82", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Hot 12 Play

Infinix Note 12: Mediatek Helio G88, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Note 12

Wiko T50: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Wiko T50

Umidigi Power 7 Max: UNISOC T610, 6.70", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Umidigi Power 7 Max

Infinix Note 12i: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.82", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Note 12i

Infinix Hot 12: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.82", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Hot 12

Cubot TAB 30: UNISOC T618, 10.10", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Cubot TAB 30

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3: Mediatek Helio G80, 10.61", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3

Vivo Y21G: Mediatek Helio G70, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y21G

Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.52", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro

Umidigi A13 Pro: UNISOC T610, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Umidigi A13 Pro

Huawei Nova Y9a: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.63", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova Y9a

Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022: Mediatek Helio G88, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022

Motorola Moto G Stylus 2022: Mediatek Helio G88, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Stylus 2022

Vivo Y33: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.58", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y33

BMAX MaxPad I11: UNISOC T618, 10.40", 0.5 kg
  External Review » BMAX MaxPad I11

Blackview Tab 11: UNISOC T618, 10.36", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Blackview Tab 11

Alldocube iPlay 40H: UNISOC T618, 10.40", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Alldocube iPlay 40H

Infinix Hot 11: Mediatek Helio G70, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Hot 11

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022: UNISOC T618, 10.50", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022

Motorola Moto G41: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G41

Infinix Note 11i: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.95", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Note 11i

Motorola Moto G31: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G31

Motorola Moto E30: UNISOC Tangula T700, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto E30

Infinix Note 11: Mediatek Helio G88, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Note 11

Motorola Moto E40: UNISOC Tangula T700, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto E40

Vivo Y33s: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.58", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y33s

Infinix Hot 11s: Mediatek Helio G88, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Hot 11s

Chuwi HiPad Air: UNISOC T618, 10.30", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Chuwi HiPad Air

Gigaset GS5: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Gigaset GS5

Realme C25Y: UNISOC T610, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme C25Y

Realme Narzo 50A: Mediatek Helio G85, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Narzo 50A

Infinix Hot 10i: Mediatek Helio P65, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Hot 10i

Nokia T20: UNISOC T610, 10.40", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Nokia T20

Realme Pad: Mediatek Helio G80, 10.40", 0.4 kg
  External Review » realme Pad

Vivo Y21s: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y21s

Samsung Galaxy M22: Mediatek Helio G80, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M22

Honor Play 5T Pro: unknown, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review »