联想Tab M10 2022（第三代）平板电脑评测--采用金属底盘的轻量级预算设备

Name: Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Brand: Lenovo

负担得起而又有光泽。 第三代联想Tab M10是一款经济型10英寸平板电脑，具有GPS功能，并且在价格上有相当大的存储空间。但你需要忍受电池寿命和屏幕亮度方面的一些缺点。在这篇评论中，我们将讨论这款廉价的平板电脑是否值得购买。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/29/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Tablet

如今，如果你想要一个经济型的平板电脑，你往往不得不看一下不太知名的公司的设备。然而，一些大型制造商继续为预算紧张的人提供设备。联想就是这样一个例子。Tab M10 2022已经是这家中国公司发布的第三代经济型10英寸平板电脑。

在这个价格段，消费者往往不得不接受一些缺点，无论是性能、电池容量还是屏幕质量。我们对联想Tab M10 2022进行了测试，仔细看看在日常使用中哪些地方可能会困扰消费者，以及这款平板电脑是否仍然令人愉快。

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Tab M Series)

Processor

UNISOC T610 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G52 MP2

Memory

4 GB

, DDR4

Display

10.10 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 50 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, acceleration sensor, hall sensor

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 239.84 x 158.62

Battery

5100 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 10-watt charging

Operating System

Android 11

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix AF
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

460 g

Price

180 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
80 %	03/2023	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 T610, Mali-G52 MP2	460 g	8.5 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
82.5 %	07/2022	Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2	465 g	7.45 mm	10.61"	2000x1200
82.2 %	02/2023	Nokia T10 T606, Mali-G57 MP1	375 g	9 mm	8.00"	1280x800
82.2 %	03/2023	Lenovo Tab M9 Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2	344 g	8 mm	9.00"	1340x800
81 %	02/2022	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2	508 g	6.9 mm	10.50"	1920x1200

外壳 - 漂亮的金属底盘

机箱绝对是这个设备令人高兴的一个方面。联想Tab M10 2022的重量为460克（1.0磅），对于一款10英寸的平板电脑来说并不算太重。尽管边框非常显眼，但它有助于防止用户无意中接触到显示屏。联想当然可以把边框做得稍微薄一些，但无论如何，第三代Tab M10看起来仍然相当现代。

为了与联想当前的设计语言保持一致，机身背面被分为两部分。下部由金属制成，而上部较窄的部分则由塑料覆盖，以方便天线接收和传输数据的能力。

哑光金属和轻度纹理的塑料形成了一种时尚的对比。这款平板电脑具有卓越的合身性和完成度，拿在手里很舒服。不幸的是，至少在欧洲，没有其他颜色可供选择。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Lenovo Tab M9 Nokia T10 DIN A5 ❌

规格 - 提供LTE版本

联想Tab M10有纯Wi-Fi和LTE版本，以及两种存储选项。我们的评测单位是一个只有Wi-Fi的型号，有64GB的存储空间。联想提供以下配置：

联想Tab M10 2022 Wi-Fi 3GB内存/32GB存储空间
联想Tab M10 2022 LTE 3GB内存/32GB存储空间
联想Tab M10 2022 Wi-Fi 4 GB内存/64 GB存储空间
联想Tab M10 2022 LTE 4GB内存/64GB存储空间

根据联想提供的官方定价，所有变体的价格应该在200欧元（215美元）左右。也就是说，与此同时，你可以在互联网上以更低的价格买到大部分的变体。

这款平板电脑使用一个USB-C端口进行数据传输和充电。然而，由于其内部连接的方式，它只能以USB 2.0的速度运行。

微型SD卡读卡器

这款microSD读卡器还可以支持容量更大的卡，并提供适度的读写速度。

我们使用我们的参考microSD卡Angelbird V60对其进行了测试。在基准测试中，Tab M10在我们的比较组中排名靠前。这意味着在这个价格范围内，有一些平板电脑可以比Tab M10更快地读写SD卡。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	49.18 MB/s +131%
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	29.6 MB/s +39%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	21.3 MB/s
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	19.8 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	16.11 MB/s -24%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34 (17.4-45.3)

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø42 (31.2-52.8)

Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.8 (25.8-45.2)

Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø28.5 (14.1-42.8)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.7 (13.3-40.3)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.3 (43.6-81.3)

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø70.5 (13.8-78.6)

Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø71.2 (36.7-79.1)

Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.6 (18.7-85.5)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (37.9-86.8)

软件--老旧而臃肿

联想在软件方面的情况值得被批评。Tab M10搭载的是过时的Android 11。根据联想的说法，应该已经有一个更新到稍新的Android 12。但我们在评测中没有找到。

联想承诺在2025年2月底之前为该平板电脑提供安全更新支持--但这些更新最多每六个月发布一次。这在我们的评测设备上很明显，在写这篇评测时，其补丁的日期是2022年9月。

然后还有一个预装软件的问题。多年来，当涉及到臃肿的软件时，联想是相当克制和模范的。但是这一次，Tab M10搭载了许多手机游戏以及相当多的第三方应用程序。一方面，这是令人讨厌的，因为对于这个价格范围内的设备来说，存储量是相当适中的。另一方面，你会不断收到通知，缠着你去尝试这个或那个游戏。

不用说，不需要的应用程序大多可以不费吹灰之力就被卸载掉。但考虑到联想过去主要提供股票的做法，这仍然给用户留下了不好的印象Android 。

连接性和GNSS - 快速和稳定

Wi-Fi 5是我们的评测装置所支持的最快的Wi-Fi标准。然而，这对联想Tab M10（第三代）来说并不是一个大问题。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，该平板电脑提供了快速和稳定的数据传输率，该测试是使用我们的参考路由器--华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000进行的。

这款平板电脑的信号强度还不错。当平板电脑靠近路由器时，Wi-Fi信号是全强度的。即使两台设备之间隔着10米和3堵墙，我们仍然有大约50%的信号强度。这就是说，当Tab M10离路由器较远时，网站的加载速度明显较慢。

如前所述，联想Tab M10 2022也有一个LTE模块。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	347 (335^min - 351^max) MBit/s +9%
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	326 (271^min - 340^max) MBit/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	325 (163^min - 328^max) MBit/s +2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	319 (310^min - 325^max) MBit/s
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	304 (279^min - 315^max) MBit/s -5%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	369 (346^min - 374^max) MBit/s +5%
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	357 (333^min - 367^max) MBit/s +2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	351 (333^min - 366^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	349 (178^min - 357^max) MBit/s -1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	346 (167^min - 354^max) MBit/s -1%

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (310-325)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø351 (333-366)

无论你购买哪种联想Tab M10（第三代），都会有一个GPS模块。然而，它在户外花了一些时间来定位我们，而且只精确到8米以内。在阴天，该设备无法探测到那么多卫星。

在我们的实地测试中，我们带着Tab M10和Garmin Venu 2一起骑自行车进行了比较。M10的表现相当好：当然，该设备产生了一些小的偏差，并显示我们应该是在骑车穿过前院和房屋，但如果你不需要导航非常精确，M10是完全可用的。

照相机--典型的平板电脑质量

一个800万像素的后置摄像头对M10来说应该是足够了。无论如何，平板电脑基本上不用于高质量的摄影。对于这个价格范围内的设备来说，主摄像头可以拍出漂亮的照片，但你不应该指望它能拍出清晰、细腻的图像。在黑暗区域有适量的增亮，仔细观察也有明显的人工痕迹。但考虑到它可能主要用于拍摄快照和扫描二维码，该相机已经足够。

后置摄像头可以拍摄高达30帧/秒的全高清视频。它的自动对焦往往略显迟缓，而且相机有时需要一段时间来适应照明情况。该相机几乎没有调整选项。

Tab M10有一个500万像素的前置摄像头。用这台相机拍摄的自拍最好不要被人发现，而且光线也要好。但除此之外，这款平板电脑拍摄的照片还可以。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera: Plant Main camera: Environment Main camera: Low light

click to load images

Lenovo Tab M10 2022 (Gen 3)

Apple iPhone 14

Honor Magic4 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Lenovo Tab M10 2022 (Gen 3)

Apple iPhone 14

Honor Magic4 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Lenovo Tab M10 2022 (Gen 3)

Apple iPhone 14

Honor Magic4 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

ColorChecker Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3: 11.68 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 16.4 ∆E

附件和保修 - 可提供对开盖子

在盒子里，你会发现一个10瓦的充电器，一条USB线和一个用于打开microSD和SIM卡插槽的工具。在该公司的网站上，联想还提供与对开盖子捆绑的平板电脑，你可以单独购买，价格约为18欧元（19.5美元）。

联想为在欧盟范围内购买的平板电脑提供24个月的保修。保修条款和条件可能因地区而异。

输入设备和操作 - 没有指纹传感器

由于Tab M10只配备了60Hz的面板，你必须满足于不完全流畅的用户体验。然而，除了一些偶尔的卡顿之外，联想Tab M10在可用性方面给人留下了良好的印象--触摸屏能够相当迅速和可靠地检测到输入。

这款平板电脑没有指纹传感器，但你可以使用人脸识别进行认证。该功能快速且相当可靠，但由于缺乏额外的专用硬件，该技术在防止操纵方面并不十分安全。

显示屏 - 可以更亮

这款10.1英寸的平板电脑有一个合适的WUXGA显示屏（比全高清略高），这意味着即使是更精细的细节也可以阅读，不会有太多的像素。你可以在屏幕上尽情享受流媒体服务的内容，因为Tab M10有Widevine认证。

然而，IPS屏幕很难达到330cd/m²的亮度，这可能是个问题，特别是如果你打算在户外或在一个非常明亮的房间里使用该设备。不过，该显示屏的黑度还是不错的（0.31cd/m²）。因此，它有一个令人满意的对比度，色彩也显得稍微鲜艳一些。


326 cd/m²	321 cd/m²	328 cd/m²
333 cd/m²	343 cd/m²	330 cd/m²
331 cd/m²	340 cd/m²	340 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 343 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 332.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 343 cd/m²
Contrast: 1106:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.184

	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10	Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 10.61	Nokia T10 IPS, 1280x800, 8.00	Lenovo Tab M9 IPS, 1340x800, 9.00	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.50
Screen		29%	-4%	32%	-19%
Brightness middle	343	510 49%	446 30%	405 18%	368 7%
Brightness	332	480 45%	429 29%	368 11%	346 4%
Brightness Distribution	94	85 -10%	94 0%	83 -12%	91 -3%
Black Level *	0.31	0.49 -58%	0.65 -110%	0.17 45%	0.61 -97%
Contrast	1106	1041 -6%	686 -38%	2382 115%	603 -45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.9	1.8 69%	4.87 17%	5.15 13%	6.9 -17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.2	3.7 67%	9.85 12%	10.12 10%	11.4 -2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.9	2.2 72%	5.7 28%	3.7 53%	7.7 3%
Gamma	2.184 ^101%	2.17 ^101%	2.189 ^101%	2.287 ^96%	2.16 ^102%
CCT	9198 ^71%	6907 ^94%	7781 ^84%	7379 ^88%	8547 ^76%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

我们在显示屏上没有检测到任何PWM。但在使用分光光度计和CalMAN软件分析面板时，我们确实发现了相当严重的蓝色色调。尤其是暖色调，也与各自的参考色有很大的偏差。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
18.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.2 ms rise
18.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22.8 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在可能的情况下，你应该避免在户外长时间使用联想Tab M10 2022，因为该显示屏在明亮的环境中是不适用的。高度反射的表面和低亮度使屏幕上的内容在这种情况下很难阅读。

视角是典型的IPS显示屏：从侧面看时，图像看起来很均匀，但亮度损失不大。

性能 - 中等强度

淘宝网统一的T610被用于入门级平板电脑和手机，总体上为这个领域提供了很好的性能。在Tab M10中，该处理器设法超过了大多数竞争对手，但差异很小。这意味着你在日常使用中不应该注意到太大的性能差异。

在大多数情况下，这款平板电脑确实感觉使用起来很顺畅，但即使是要求稍高的应用程序也会导致明显的停顿，而且Play商店的一些应用程序会直接拒绝安装在设备上。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)	664 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	365 Points +5%
Average UNISOC T610 (345 - 387, n=4)	357 Points +3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	346 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	343 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab M9	338 Points -2%
Nokia T10	310 Points -10%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)	2362 Points +86%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1267 Points
Average UNISOC T610 (1034 - 1425, n=4)	1264 Points 0%
Nokia T10	1256 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	1247 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab M9	1241 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	1229 Points -3%

Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (408 - 1663, n=5, last 2 years)	728 Points +75%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	417 Points
Average UNISOC T610 ()	417 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (1361 - 4130, n=5, last 2 years)	2076 Points +53%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1361 Points
Average UNISOC T610 ()	1361 Points 0%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=52, last 2 years)	453858 Points +127%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	211417 Points +6%
Lenovo Tab M9	207904 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	201310 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	199786 Points
Average UNISOC T610 (162968 - 199786, n=2)	181377 Points -9%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1585, n=51, last 2 years)	672 Points +89%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	361 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	356 Points
Average UNISOC T610 ()	356 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M9	348 Points -2%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=52, last 2 years)	3631 Points +59%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	2283 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	2134 Points -7%
Average UNISOC T610 (1862 - 2283, n=2)	2073 Points -9%
Lenovo Tab M9	2072 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	1839 Points -19%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=52, last 2 years)	6543 Points +37%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	4777 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	4729 Points -1%
Average UNISOC T610 (4461 - 4777, n=2)	4619 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	4133 Points -13%
Lenovo Tab M9	4045 Points -15%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=52, last 2 years)	4284 Points +26%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	3412 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	2436 Points -29%
Average UNISOC T610 (1449 - 3412, n=2)	2431 Points -29%
Lenovo Tab M9	2343 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	970 Points -72%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=52, last 2 years)	6639 Points +343%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	2001 Points +34%
Lenovo Tab M9	1818 Points +21%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	1786 Points +19%
Average UNISOC T610 (1497 - 1522, n=2)	1510 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1497 Points
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	1246 Points +12%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=52, last 2 years)	1205 Points +8%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	1186 Points +6%
Average UNISOC T610 (1114 - 1221, n=2)	1168 Points +5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1114 Points
Lenovo Tab M9	1069 Points -4%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=39, last 2 years)	5325 Points +1663%
Lenovo Tab M9	311 Points +3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	302 Points
Average UNISOC T610 ()	302 Points 0%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=49, last 2 years)	8899 Points +435%
Lenovo Tab M9	3992 Points +140%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1662 Points
Average UNISOC T610 (1535 - 1662, n=2)	1599 Points -4%

Legend

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mediatek Helio G80, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Nokia T10 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Tab M9 Mediatek Helio G80, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Average UNISOC T610

Average of class Tablet

虽然 ARM Mali G52 MP2为入门级平板电脑提供了足够的图形性能，但GPU在联想Tab M10 2022中却难以展示它。因此，在我们的比较中，这款平板电脑始终有点落后于其他设备。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	180 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	179 Points +36%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	171 Points +30%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	132 Points
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	110 Points -17%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	184 Points +36%
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	177 Points +31%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	176 Points +30%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	135 Points
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	114 Points -16%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	708 Points +36%
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	705 Points +35%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	691 Points +32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	522 Points
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	411 Points -21%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	712 Points +36%
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	692 Points +32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	687 Points +31%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	524 Points
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	412 Points -21%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1463 Points +28%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1355 Points +18%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1146 Points
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	976 Points -15%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1875 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1284 Points +31%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	979 Points
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	826 Points -16%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2865 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2848 Points
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2676 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2564 Points -10%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	52 fps +68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	39 fps +26%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	39 fps +26%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	44 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps +28%
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps +28%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	32 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	42 fps +121%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	25 fps +32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps +11%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	19 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	26 fps +30%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	24 fps +20%
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	23 fps +15%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	20 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	29 fps +164%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +36%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps +18%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +25%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps +17%
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps +17%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.2 fps +44%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.3 fps +30%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.4 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.7 fps +47%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.2 fps +39%
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8.6 fps +30%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.6 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8.1 fps +80%
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7.1 fps +58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6 fps +33%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps +16%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4.5 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3.6 fps +33%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3.2 fps +19%
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3.1 fps +15%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2.7 fps
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2 fps -26%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps +62%
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps +49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.9 fps +34%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8 fps +8%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.4 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	10 fps +28%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps +12%
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8.2 fps +5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.8 fps
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5.5 fps -29%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.4 fps +17%
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1.4 fps +17%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.2 fps
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash	0.84 fps -30%

在浏览互联网时，你同样不应该期望网站和图片能在Tab M10 Gen 3上即时加载。综上所述，就其价格而言，这款平板电脑做得不错，只要有一点耐心，就可以用来频繁浏览网页。

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=59, last 2 years)	84.9 Points +81%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	46.85 Points
Average UNISOC T610 (41.5 - 46.9, n=2)	44.2 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	43.98 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)	38.697 Points -17%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)	32.868 Points -30%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 227, n=57, last 2 years)	85.7 Points +62%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	53 Points
Average UNISOC T610 ()	53 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)	45 Points -15%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=52, last 2 years)	77.2 runs/min +124%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chome 111)	34.43 runs/min
Average UNISOC T610 (32.4 - 34.4, n=2)	33.4 runs/min -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	33.35 runs/min -3%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chome 110)	30 runs/min -13%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)	21.8 runs/min -37%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)	23028 Points +93%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)	12744 Points +7%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)	12163 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	11952 Points
Average UNISOC T610 ()	11952 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	10787 Points -10%
Nokia T10 (Chrome 109)	9871 Points -17%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)	3467.2 ms * -13%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)	3227.4 ms * -5%
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years)	3209 ms * -4%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	3075.1 ms *
Average UNISOC T610 ()	3075 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	3060 ms * -0%

* ... smaller is better

Tab M10配备了eMMC闪存，这是目前智能手机和平板电脑中使用的最慢的存储技术。因此，这款平板电脑在这一领域的性能预期很低。

也就是说，在这个价位上，只有少数其他平板电脑的数据读写速度比M10快。

	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3	Nokia T10	Lenovo Tab M9	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-11%	-13%	-2%	-31%	-31%	128%
Sequential Read 256KB	277.2	393.23 42%	273.5 -1%	274.3 -1%	255.1 -8%	273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=201) -2%	850 ?(163 - 3414, n=68, last 2 years) 207%
Sequential Write 256KB	210.4	234.88 12%	191.5 -9%	184.4 -12%	101.1 -52%	176.8 ?(40 - 274, n=201) -16%	532 ?(78.2 - 2528, n=68, last 2 years) 153%
Random Read 4KB	105.1	75.12 -29%	71.4 -32%	95.2 -9%	68.3 -35%	59.1 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=201) -44%	167 ?(18.4 - 451, n=68, last 2 years) 59%
Random Write 4KB	78.5	23.97 -69%	71.5 -9%	91 16%	57.5 -27%	31.7 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=201) -60%	150.8 ?(8.23 - 503, n=68, last 2 years) 92%

游戏--在紧要关头是可能的

虽然可以在联想Tab M10（第三代）上进行游戏，但这种体验可能无法满足苛刻的游戏玩家。例如，PUBG Mobile的帧率太低。即使在低设置下，游戏的速度也不能超过40帧。其他游戏如《暗黑破坏神》甚至根本无法运行。

我们在快节奏的动作游戏Armajet中达到60帧，但帧率并不完全稳定。所有帧率测量都是使用我们的合作伙伴GameBench的软件进行的。.

无论你是使用触摸屏（例如在无尽跑酷中）还是使用运动传感器，控制都相当流畅。

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø55.8 (38-61)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.5.0: Ø37.2 (26-41)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.5.0: Ø29.3 (23-31)

排放--受热时刻

温度

根据我们的测量，平板电脑的表面在极高的负载下确实变得相当热。后置摄像头周围的区域甚至变得触感不适，高达48.2℃（118.8℉）。更重要的是，测量是在室温下进行的，而不是在户外烈日下进行的，在那里设备可能变得更热。然而，在正常使用过程中，热量不应该是一个问题。

性能也不受热的影响：联想Tab M10的帧数几乎是相同的，即使在运行相同的高要求基准测试20次后。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.14 (3.13-3.16)

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.1 (4.03-4.12)

Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.49 (2.46-2.54)

Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.26 (4.2-4.28)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.26 (4.25-4.27)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.799 (0.789-0.809)

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø1.038 (1.025-1.051)

Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.07 (1.063-1.076)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.096 (1.091-1.101)

Max. Load

Idle


38.4 °C	33.5 °C	29.1 °C
35.5 °C	30.7 °C	28.6 °C
33.3 °C	28.9 °C	27.6 °C

Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 31.7 °C


32 °C	40.5 °C	48.2 °C
29 °C	30.6 °C	33.2 °C
27.8 °C	29.6 °C	31.3 °C

Maximum: 48.2 °C
Average: 33.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39.9 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

发言人

两个扬声器都位于联想Tab M10的顶部。扬声器的位置使它们能够创造出温和的立体声效果，尽管由于它们之间的距离相对较近，并不是很好听。

总的来说，扬声器可以使用更多的功率，但没有削波，它们的声音整体上很好听。

通过3.5毫米音频插孔或蓝牙将扬声器或一副耳机连接到设备上，你会得到更好的音频。Tab M10支持以下蓝牙编解码器：SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD和LDAC。这意味着对于大多数无线耳机来说，应该有一个好的编解码器。但该设备缺乏对更高级编解码器的支持。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--使用率相当高，充电速度慢

消耗功率

联想Tab M10 2022最低需要1.9瓦的功率，这比其他平板电脑的功率高很多。然而，在低负荷情况下，它几乎不消耗任何更多的电力，而且最大功率与同类设备差不多。

附带的适配器能够以高达10瓦的功率为该平板电脑充电。鉴于充电速度慢，Tab M10的电池不是很大，这是一件好事。即便如此，仍然需要三个小时才能将设备充满。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.2 / 0.3 Watt
Idle	1.9 / 2.1 / 2.5 Watt
Load	7.6 / 9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 7500 mAh	Lenovo Tab M9 5100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 7040 mAh
Power Consumption		-22%	27%	-34%
Idle Minimum *	1.9	0.94 51%	1.6 16%	1.19 37%
Idle Average *	2.1	4.22 -101%	1.7 19%	4.63 -120%
Idle Maximum *	2.5	4.37 -75%	1.8 28%	4.68 -87%
Load Average *	7.6	6.12 19%	2.8 63%	7.27 4%
Load Maximum *	9	9.14 -2%	8.1 10%	9.17 -2%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3: Ø8.52 (6.01-11.4)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.73 (7.6-7.99)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.03 (1.907-2.62)

电池寿命

联想平板电脑的5100毫安时电池对于一个10英寸的设备来说并不算大，这意味着在耐力方面必须做出妥协。

然而，这些妥协其实并不激烈：在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，M10持续了14小时21分，这比许多其他设备的能力要短，但仍然足以满足日常使用。这款平板电脑在需要充电之前应该能够提供两天的使用时间。

当用于观看电影和玩游戏时，M10同样可以持续与同类平板电脑的时间相当。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		32h 32min
WiFi Websurfing		14h 21min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 33min

	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 7500 mAh	Nokia T10 5250 mAh	Lenovo Tab M9 5100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 7040 mAh
Battery Runtime		14%	14%	4%	-8%
Reader / Idle	1952	2373 22%		2132 9%	1973 1%
H.264	1002	1151 15%		987 -1%	824 -18%
WiFi v1.3	861	909 6%	984 14%	955 11%	679 -21%
Load	213	239 12%		206 -3%	230 8%

Pros

+ 价格低廉

+ 优质的金属底盘

+ 良好的Wi-Fi接收

+ 即使是Wi-Fi型号也有GPS模块

+ 足够的电池寿命，适合日常使用

+ 负载下性能稳定

+ 没有PWM

+ 具备Widevine认证

+ 有LTE型号

Cons

- 性能平平

- 充电时间长

- 负载下会非常热

- 显示屏暗淡，有明显的蓝色色调

- 扬声器质量不高

- 在审查时只有Android 11

- 不经常更新

- 大量臃肿的软件

结论 - 标准的经济型平板电脑

联想Tab M10 2022（第三代）是一款令人喜欢的、相当轻便的平板电脑，规格也不错。它的价格约为200欧元（215美元），也可使用LTE。本评论中的Wi-Fi型号能够实现稳定的网络传输速度，并具有GPS模块，虽然不完美，但做得足够好。

在性能、显示亮度和电池寿命方面，必须做出妥协。但根据使用情况，它们绝对是可以容忍的（例如，如果你需要一个用于客厅的平板电脑）。我们更恼火的是，联想仍然用旧版本的Android ，而且在发布更新方面也非常缓慢。另外，尽管这款平板电脑在重负荷下会变得相当热，但其性能并没有受到影响。

你很难发现联想Tab M10 2022（第三代）有什么特别之处，但你得到的是一款运行良好的坚实、时尚的平板电脑。

那些想要更好的音质的人可以看一下三星Galaxy Tab A8，它的特点是有多达四个扬声器。M10还面临着联想内部的大量竞争：Tab M9。 Tab M9略为紧凑，而 Tab M10 Plus而Tab M10 Plus则提供了更多存储空间，甚至支持笔的选择。

价格和可用性

联想Tab M10 2022（第三代）可以直接从制造商那里购买。在本评论发表时，配备3GB内存和32GB存储空间的机型价格大约为180欧元（195美元），配备对开盖子的价格为208欧元（225美元）。

Tab M10目前仍未在美国和英国上市销售。在德国，你可以购买4GB内存和64GB存储的机型，价格约为 200欧元（216美元）。在亚马逊上。LTE版本只能从第三方零售商处购买，如亚马逊和Cyberport.

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 - 2023-03-25 03/25/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

81 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

65 / 80 → 82%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

40 / 70 → 57%

Weight

84 / 40-88 → 91%

Battery

90%

Display

81%

Games Performance

10 / 78 → 13%

Application Performance

46 / 92 → 50%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

64 / 91 → 70%

Camera

48 / 85 → 57%

Average

68%

80%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Zhiwei Zhuang - Translator - 149 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想Tab M10 2022（第三代）平板电脑评测--采用金属底盘的轻量级预算设备

Florian Schmitt, 2023-03-29 (Update: 2023-03-29)