Notebookcheck

Gigaset GS5评论 - 温和的升级,在德国的智能手机

换电池! Gigaset GS5今年保留了一个老的优点 - 可移动电池 - 但增加了一个新的SoC,更多的内存,和一个更有前途的相机设置。作为回报,它的价格更高,而且电源适配器也从包装中删除。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Gigaset GS5 (GS Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G85 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.30 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, capacitive, 10 multi touch points, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 112 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: Audio Jack (3.5 mm), USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 512 GB (FAT, FAT32), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Orientation, Gyroscope, Proximity, Rotation, OTG, FM-Radio
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (900, 2100 MHz), LTE (FDD: 700, 800, 850, 900, 1800, 2100, 2600 MHz; TDD: 2300, 2600 MHz), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 10.4 x 157.5 x 75
Battery
17.325 Wh, 4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, removeable, 3.85 V
Charging
wireless charging
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.8) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide/Macro, f/2.2); 1080p-Video; Camera2-API-Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB-Cabel (Type-A to Type-C), Quick Start Guide, 24 Months Warranty, Head-SAR: 0.290 W/kg, Body-SAR: 1.698 W/kg, DRM Widevine L3; GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (L1), BeiDou (L1), SBAS, fanless
Weight
210 g
Price
299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Bewertung
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
79.5 %
12/2021
Gigaset GS5
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
210 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.30"2340x1080
77.2 %
10/2020
realme 7i
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
208 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
79.3 %
03/2021
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
205 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720
83.6 %
08/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
SD 732G, Adreno 618
157 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080

案例、设备和操作

在Gigaset GS5看起来很像它的 前辈但它是一个有点重,只有一个双摄像头设置在后面,仍然是可更换的后盖平齐。与GS4一样,玻璃背面被整齐地框在塑料中,但卡槽现在在盖子下面。可拆卸的电池很容易接触到,而且事先取出SIM卡托盘也不再需要了。总的来说,我们喜欢它的制造质量。

GS5的功能相当令人印象深刻。除了一个成熟的双SIM卡(nano)插槽,还有一个microSD存储插槽,可以接受最大512GB的存储卡。不过,microSD插槽不支持exFAT文件系统。Gigaset没有提供关于充电速度的详细信息,只是说电池可以在两小时内充电,用18W的电源适配器应该可以大致做到。通过无线方式,智能手机的充电功率可达15W。还集成了一个FM广播接收器。缺乏DRM认证是令人失望的。

谷歌Android 11被用作操作系统,并做了最小的修改。Android 12应该在明年提供,Gigaset承诺将在三年内进行安全更新。

Gigaset GS5的通信模块工作在一个适当的水平。交流无线局域网提供稳定的传输速率,我们参考Netgear Nighthawk AX12路由器。支持的移动频率涵盖了欧洲最重要的频段,但没有更多,也没有5G。

当把GS5拿在耳边时,它的语音质量很好。所有的通话参与者都能清楚地理解,并能自然地听到。噪声抑制在嘈杂的环境噪声中留下了相当平庸的印象。虽然我们在Gigaset的智能手机上仍然可以理解,但我们确实听起来很闷,音量波动很大。扬声器听起来有点空洞,但在安静的环境中,总体上还是有说服力的,可以理解。支持VoLTE和WLAN通话等功能。

GS5的系统速度令人满意。尽管采用了较新的SoC,但时不时会出现一些小插曲。然而,玻璃表面具有良好的滑行性能,而且输入在触摸屏上得到了精确的实现。背面的指纹扫描仪有很高的识别率和吸引人的解锁速度。还有一个不太安全的2D人脸识别。

Size comparison

164.1 mm 75.5 mm 9.8 mm 208 g164.2 mm 76.1 mm 9.1 mm 205 g157.5 mm 75 mm 10.4 mm 210 g160.53 mm 75.73 mm 6.81 mm 157 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Smartphone
  (11.8 - 55.3, n=55, last 2 years)
25.6 MB/s ∼100% +60%
Gigaset GS5
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
16.03 MB/s ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13.83 MB/s ∼54% -14%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Gigaset GS5 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø30.3 (20.9-41.7)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential write; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø40 (30.3-51)
Gigaset GS5 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.6 (32.4-81)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential read; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø85.5 (35-92.3)
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
realme 7i
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
352 (319min - 359max) MBit/s ∼100% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
346 (324min - 360max) MBit/s ∼98% +18%
Gigaset GS5
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
294 (284min - 300max) MBit/s ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
283 (277min - 288max) MBit/s ∼80% -4%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
366 (347min - 374max) MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Gigaset GS5
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
339 (169min - 359max) MBit/s ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
332 (320min - 341max) MBit/s ∼91% -2%
realme 7i
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
288 (261min - 319max) MBit/s ∼79% -15%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Gigaset GS5 Mediatek Helio G85, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø331 (169-359)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, ARM Mali-G57 MP3; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (347-374)
Gigaset GS5 Mediatek Helio G85, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø294 (284-300)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, ARM Mali-G57 MP3; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø346 (324-360)

相机 - 双光学与48MP的Gigaset GS5

与Gigaset GS5自拍
与Gigaset GS5自拍

Gigaset已经增加了GS5的百万像素范围。前置镜头现在有1600万像素,照片的质量是类似于的 GS4并在一个体面的水平。

背面的设置现在少了一个镜头,但超广角镜头现在接管了以前微距镜头的任务。这对特写镜头有积极作用,尽管不应期待奇迹。得益于4800万像素的主摄像头,照片明显更好,看起来比GS4的照片更明亮、更生动。在变焦方面没有太大的变化,最终以4倍的数字放大率结束,质量相当不令人信服。

前置摄像头记录的视频最好是全高清(30帧),而主摄像头则是QHD(1440p @ 30帧)。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
6.4 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Gigaset GS5: 4.96 ∆E min: 1.2 - max: 9.51 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
63.8 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
65.3 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
49.3 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
44 ∆E
93 ∆E
70.7 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
24 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Gigaset GS5: 46.95 ∆E min: 13.64 - max: 92.97 ∆E

显示屏 - 无闪烁的液晶显示屏,亮度更高

子像素结构
子像素结构

Gigaset没有改变显示尺寸与前辈相比,但增加了一些亮度,这是一个类似的水平,在手动模式和APL50测量。黑值还可以,并提供了一个清晰的对比度。然而,最低亮度太高,所以眼睛在黑暗中会感到不必要的紧张。

色彩再现也不是特别准确。灰度非常冷,所有的颜色都是过饱和的。因此,它们往往看起来有点花哨,但不会让人过于讨厌。

534
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
518
cd/m²
535
cd/m²
513
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
505
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 535 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 516.8 cd/m² Minimum: 21.11 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 513 cd/m²
Contrast: 1315:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.2 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 8.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.91
Gigaset GS5
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.30
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
TFT-LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
realme 7i
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Response Times
-33%
12%
93%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
50 ?(28.4, 21.6)
66.8 ?(32, 34.8)
-34%
40 ?(19, 21)
20%
2.8 ?(1.6, 1.2)
94%
Response Time Black / White *
30.8 ?(13.6, 17.2)
40.8 ?(19.2, 21.6)
-32%
30 ?(13, 17)
3%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
92%
PWM Frequency
925.9 ?(25)
373.1 ?(53)
Screen
-3%
-9%
57%
Brightness middle
513
543
6%
597
16%
815
59%
Brightness
517
512
-1%
569
10%
809
56%
Brightness Distribution
93
85
-9%
91
-2%
98
5%
Black Level *
0.39
0.63
-62%
0.74
-90%
Contrast
1315
862
-34%
807
-39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.2
4.9
32%
5.47
24%
1.3
82%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.8
8.6
20%
12.11
-12%
3.1
71%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8.6
6.3
27%
6.9
20%
2.6
70%
Gamma
1.91 115%
2.23 99%
2.363 93%
2.17 101%
CCT
8643 75%
8120 80%
8091 80%
6544 99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-18% / -9%
2% / -5%
75% / 66%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.6 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 28.4 ms rise
↘ 21.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20917 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

灰度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
在户外
在户外
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能、排放和电池寿命

芯片 Helio G85 SoC的Gigaset GS5是较新的比 Helio P70在GS4,但不一定更快。3DMark中的图形计算显示前一年的模型有小的优势,但GFXBench测试再次扭转局面。一般来说,性能更多的是在中端。GS5在任何时候都不会产生大量的热量,它只是在触摸时感到温暖。

下巴上的扬声器在中等音量下听起来相当平衡,但在较高的音量下,轰鸣声和噪音非常强烈。Gigaset已经改善了音频插孔,它提供了一个干净的声音输出(SNR:94.37 dBFS)。那些喜欢蓝牙的人可以使用音频编解码器SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD和LDAC。

电池运行时间总体良好,但比前代产品略差,尽管采用了更大的电池。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
352 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
472 Points ∼78% +34%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
354 Points ∼58% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
565 Points ∼93% +61%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (344 - 369, n=7)
355 Points ∼58% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=268, last 2 years)
609 Points ∼100% +73%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1296 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1511 Points ∼73% +17%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1305 Points ∼63% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
1792 Points ∼87% +38%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1259 - 1351, n=7)
1307 Points ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=268, last 2 years)
2066 Points ∼100% +59%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8655 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
8793 Points ∼88% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (6596 - 8672, n=4)
7753 Points ∼78% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=91, last 2 years)
9956 Points ∼100% +15%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6145 Points ∼71%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8655 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
8064 Points ∼93%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (8655 - 8698, n=3)
8674 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=216, last 2 years)
8268 Points ∼95%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1850 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3713 Points ∼83% +101%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1844 Points ∼41% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
3939 Points ∼88% +113%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1785 - 1897, n=6)
1847 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=255, last 2 years)
4455 Points ∼100% +141%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1701 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3975 Points ∼69% +134%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1693 Points ∼29% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
4256 Points ∼74% +150%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1633 - 1765, n=6)
1698 Points ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=255, last 2 years)
5766 Points ∼100% +239%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2672 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3018 Points ∼96% +13%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2684 Points ∼86% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
3125 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2644 - 2778, n=6)
2701 Points ∼86% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=253, last 2 years)
3137 Points ∼100% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1406 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2575 Points ∼93% +83%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1400 Points ∼50% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
2760 Points ∼99% +96%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1400 - 1463, n=6)
1421 Points ∼51% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=224, last 2 years)
2774 Points ∼100% +97%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1250 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2525 Points ∼86% +102%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1237 Points ∼42% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
2621 Points ∼89% +110%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1237 - 1268, n=6)
1253 Points ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=224, last 2 years)
2932 Points ∼100% +135%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2493 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2765 Points ∼82% +11%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2600 Points ∼77% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
3386 Points ∼100% +36%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2493 - 2654, n=6)
2585 Points ∼76% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=224, last 2 years)
2918 Points ∼86% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1427 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2659 Points ∼73% +86%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1411 Points ∼38% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
2935 Points ∼80% +106%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1411 - 1453, n=6)
1432 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=257, last 2 years)
3667 Points ∼100% +157%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1263 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2597 Points ∼60% +106%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1243 Points ∼29% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
2825 Points ∼66% +124%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1243 - 1270, n=6)
1259 Points ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 16221, n=257, last 2 years)
4294 Points ∼100% +240%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2614 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2901 Points ∼85% +11%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2681 Points ∼79% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
3400 Points ∼100% +30%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2603 - 2811, n=6)
2696 Points ∼79% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=257, last 2 years)
3165 Points ∼93% +21%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
721 Points ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1245 Points ∼42% +73%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
706 Points ∼24% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
1116 Points ∼38% +55%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (706 - 721, n=5)
717 Points ∼24% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9680, n=135, last 2 years)
2938 Points ∼100% +307%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
717 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1215 Points ∼40% +69%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
698 Points ∼23% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
1112 Points ∼37% +55%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (698 - 717, n=5)
713 Points ∼23% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=132, last 2 years)
3041 Points ∼100% +324%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
98.9 (1240min - 1254max) % ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
99.6 (1111min - 1116max) % ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (99.3 - 99.3, n=2)
99.3 % ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (26.6 - 99.8, n=119, last 2 years)
90.3 % ∼91%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
181 Points ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
337 Points ∼37% +86%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (181 - 186, n=4)
183 Points ∼20% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=83, last 2 years)
908 Points ∼100% +402%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
180 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
331 Points ∼36% +84%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (180 - 181, n=4)
180 Points ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 4236, n=82, last 2 years)
927 Points ∼100% +415%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
99.4 (337min - 335max) % ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (98.3 - 98.9, n=2)
98.6 % ∼99%
Average of class Smartphone
  (38.6 - 100, n=72, last 2 years)
90.9 % ∼91%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.5 fps ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
30 fps ∼100% +253%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
18 fps ∼60% +112%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps ∼63% +124%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (8.4 - 18, n=6)
10.7 fps ∼36% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=268, last 2 years)
25.7 fps ∼86% +202%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.5 fps ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼56% +79%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.7 fps ∼32% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
20 fps ∼66% +111%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (8 - 9.7, n=6)
9.35 fps ∼31% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 257, n=268, last 2 years)
30.3 fps ∼100% +219%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5.5 fps ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼99% +209%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12 fps ∼70% +118%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
12 fps ∼70% +118%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (5.4 - 12, n=6)
7.65 fps ∼44% +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 60, n=269, last 2 years)
17.2 fps ∼100% +213%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Gigaset GS5
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.4 fps ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6.2 fps ∼53% +82%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.5 fps ∼30% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 8192
7.4 fps ∼63% +118%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (3.1 - 3.5, n=6)
3.4 fps ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 101, n=269, last 2 years)
11.7 fps ∼100% +244%
Gigaset GS5Samsung Galaxy A32 5Grealme 7iXiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4GAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
163%
26%
98%
-9%
136%
Sequential Read 256KB
319.83
858.19
168%
316.4
-1%
481.76
51%
282 ?(107 - 501, n=47)
-12%
843 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=271, last 2 years)
164%
Sequential Write 256KB
269.05
381.69
42%
187.2
-30%
269.05
0%
193 ?(90 - 314, n=47)
-28%
386 ?(11.9 - 1321, n=271, last 2 years)
43%
Random Read 4KB
160.53
174.64
9%
77.4
-52%
145.02
-10%
81 ?(10.1 - 247, n=47)
-50%
148 ?(13.5 - 325, n=271, last 2 years)
-8%
Random Write 4KB
31.37
167.15
433%
89.5
185%
141.55
351%
48.1 ?(5.3 - 160, n=47)
53%
140 ?(5.5 - 330, n=271, last 2 years)
346%

温度

Max. Load
 36.3 °C35.8 °C36.5 °C 
 36.6 °C36.3 °C35.3 °C 
 35.8 °C34 °C33.9 °C 
Maximum: 36.6 °C
Average: 35.6 °C
32 °C32.6 °C33.8 °C
31.4 °C32.6 °C33.1 °C
30.8 °C31.5 °C32.2 °C
Maximum: 33.8 °C
Average: 32.2 °C
Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.


扬声器

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.834.9252432.63116.127.14027.624.95032.331.66323.432.3802231.110022311252133.716017.935.920013.339.325015.245.131513.250.840011.558.850012.264.163012.368.980013.370.6100014.574.7125012.277.3160011.275.9200011.779.1250012.178.2315012.778.4400013.676.4500013.181.3630013.681.4800013.176.41000013.674.11250013.673.61600013.566.2SPL2589.6N0.677.3median 13.3median 73.6Delta1.212.335.944.92942.825.144.231.445.142.446.132.448.52647.821.547.41549.121.350.914.453.81457.513.559.511.964.312.265.512.666.513.471.712.275.712.37812.779.913.580.9138312.885.113.782.313.583.613.881.714.783.313.680.214.2731571.125.793.20.795median 13.5median 73110.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigaset GS5Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigaset GS5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Gigaset GS5
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
5000 mAh
realme 7i
6000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G
4250 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
868
1235
42%
1307
51%
692
-20%
907 ?(442 - 1953, n=278, last 2 years)
4%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 94)
14h 28min

Pros

+ 双卡加microSD
+ 可更换电池
+ 无线充电

Cons

- 不支持exFAT的microSD
- 没有DRM认证
- 显示屏最低亮度高

结论 - GS5以独特的卖点令人信服

在审查。Gigaset GS5。测试设备由德国Gigaset公司提供。
在审查。Gigaset GS5。测试设备由德国Gigaset公司提供。

Gigaset GS5以其简单的设计和良好的结构令人信服,但它也有独特的卖点,无线充电高达15W和一个可交换的电池,这是没有发现在这个价格范围。此外,操作系统的更新长达3年,并不总是在这个领域看到。

Gigaset GS5以可更换的电池、良好的制造质量、Qi充电和大大改进的摄像头而令人信服,但它需要在系统速度和缺乏5G方面做出妥协。

此外,这款德国制造的手机提供了一个大内存和一个好的音频插孔。在摄像头方面也向前迈进了一大步。另一方面,GS5也不得不忍受批评。SoC不是最快的之一,没有对microSD的exFAT支持,DRM认证和5G也不存在。

强大的竞争主要来自于远东地区,其形式为 Galaxy A32 5G小米11 Lite 4G.

价格和可用性

在Gigaset GS5是可直接从制造商的商店在那里,它可以选择被雕刻(+€5)或有一个passepartout图像打印一个小的附加费用(+€15)。另外,Gigaset GS5也可与亚马逊OTTO.

Gigaset GS5 - 12/10/2021 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
49 / 70 → 71%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
82%
Games Performance
17 / 64 → 27%
Application Performance
70 / 86 → 82%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 85%
Camera
64%
Average
75%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 215142 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Gigaset GS5评论 - 温和的升级,在德国的智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2021-12-15 (Update: 2021-12-15)