Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉 Moto G24 Power 评测--一款经济实惠、电池寿命长的手机

耐力双胞胎 摩托罗拉 Moto G24 Power 配备超大容量电池,即使在远离电源插座的地方,也能让您长时间工作和上网。这款智能手机还具有许多其他优点,如强大的内存和存储配置以及 90Hz 显示屏。
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen
Motorola Moto G24 Power (Moto G20 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G85 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 MB 
Display
6.56 inch 20:9, 1612 x 720 pixel 269 PPI, Capacitive, IPS, capacitive touchscreen, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 210 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (dedicated, up to 1TB) , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9 x 163.5 x 74.5
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 30-watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison AF, LED flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 1.12µm, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid) , Keyboard: on-screen, charger, USB cable, 24 Months Warranty, IP52-certified, fanless
Weight
197 g
Price
190 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Bewertung
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
79 %
04/2024
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
197 g256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash6.56"1612x720
80 %
04/2024
Samsung Galaxy A15
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
200 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2340x1080
80.2 %
02/2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
SD 685, Adreno 610
188.5 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
81.9 %
03/2024
Motorola Moto G34
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
179 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720

外壳和规格 - 结构合理,不厚重

除了标准版 Moto G24 外,摩托罗拉还推出了 G24 Power,这款手机以更大的电池容量脱颖而出。今天,我们将近距离了解这款手机。

两款手机有一些不同之处:Power 机型厚 1 毫米(约 0.04 英寸),重 16 克(0.56 盎司),但充电速度快一倍,电池容量多 1000 毫安时。

机身由哑光塑料制成,有浅蓝和深蓝两种颜色可供选择。左上角略微突出的摄像头模块与设计有机地融为一体,并采用了柔和的弧形过渡,使该设备的外观和质感极具质感。

边框同样与显示屏模块天衣无缝地融为一体,相当薄的屏幕边框使 G24 Power 看起来非常时尚。机身的坚固程度给我们留下了深刻印象:扭动手机不会导致吱吱作响或任何移动;同样,你必须施加非常强大的力量才能影响显示屏中的液晶。

这款摩托罗拉手机甚至还通过了 IP 认证,尽管认证等级仅为 IP52。这意味着该设备可以很好地防尘,但只能承受水滴。

与 Moto G24 不同的是,Moto G24 Power 配备了 256 GB 存储空间和 8 GB 内存,因此在这方面的规格更高。这款手机的价格约为 190 欧元(195 美元),而且只有这种存储和内存配置。

3.5 毫米音频插孔可让你插入一副耳机。您还可以使用 NFC 读取标签并进行无线支付。除了两个 nano-SIM 卡插槽外,SIM 卡托盘还能容纳一张 microSD 卡。但你不能在这款经济型手机上添加任何 eSIM 配置文件。

我们用参考 microSD(Angelbird V60)对读卡器进行了测试,发现它的传输速度与同类手机相当。尽管如此,它并没有充分发挥该卡的潜力。

尺寸比较

163.5 mm 74.5 mm 9 mm 197 g162.7 mm 74.7 mm 8.2 mm 179 g162.2 mm 75.6 mm 8 mm 188.5 g160.1 mm 76.8 mm 8.4 mm 200 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A15
  (Angelbird V60)
42.6 MB/s +13%
Motorola Moto G34
  (Angelbird V60)
39.5 MB/s +5%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
  (Angelbird V60)
37.6 MB/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (12.1 - 77, n=99, last 2 years)
29 MB/s -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
  (Angelbird V60)
24.3 MB/s -35%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Motorola Moto G24 Power Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37 (22.6-43.5)
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø35.2 (23-46.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø26.5 (17.2-40)
Motorola Moto G34 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.4 (26.3-51.7)
Motorola Moto G24 Power Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.7 (15.6-84)
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.1 (47.4-81.9)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76 (18.4-82.5)
Motorola Moto G34 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.1 (31.5-85.3)

连接、软件和操作 -Android 14,3 年更新一次

Wi-Fi 5 是摩托罗拉 Moto G24 Power 支持的最快无线标准。在使用我们的参考路由器(华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000)进行的测试中,这款智能手机的速度通常在 290 到 350 Mbit/s 之间。在测试过程中,传输速率也非常稳定。

Moto G24 Power 是一款 LTE 手机,因此无法使用目前最快的蜂窝标准 5G。我们的评测机支持在欧洲中部使用的最基本频率,但仅此而已。如果您打算去更远的地方旅行,有必要检查一下 Moto G24 Power 是否能在相应的国家访问移动互联网。

Android Moto G24 Power 预装了 14,而且是相当原版的,这意味着制造商没有对用户界面进行任何改动。所有特殊功能都可以在 Moto 应用程序中找到。我们的评测机在评测期间收到了 2024 年 3 月的安全补丁,因此保持了最新状态。摩托罗拉甚至承诺每两个月提供一次安全更新,直到 2027 年 1 月。至于这款手机最终会有多少个新的操作系统版本,我们拭目以待。

90Hz 的触摸屏使用起来非常准确可靠,即使在边缘和角落也是如此。物理音量键和电源键位于机身右侧。后者内置了指纹传感器,解锁时延迟很短,非常可靠。手机还提供人脸识别解锁功能,但它使用的是 2D 方法,因此不太安全。

Networking
Motorola Moto G24 Power
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
358 (min: 342) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
289 (min: 275) MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A15
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
364 (min: 352) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
285 (min: 259) MBit/s ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
364 (min: 336) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
317 (min: 293) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Moto G34
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
337 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
279 (min: 210) MBit/s ∼88%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Motorola Moto G24 Power; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø289 (275-310)
Motorola Moto G24 Power; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (342-368)

摄像头 - 清晰的图像质量

使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

摩托罗拉为主摄像头配备了 5000 万像素的三星传感器,通常只使用四分之一的分辨率来拍摄照片。这就有效地增大了像素,从而提高了感光度。对于这个价位的手机来说,使用该相机拍摄的照片非常典型:色彩尚可,但在极亮或极暗的区域并不总是有完美的动态范围。总体而言,清晰度还可以更高;在放大图片或使用数码变焦时,这一点尤为明显。

总体而言,照片的细节表现不错,即使是戏剧性的天空也能很好地呈现在周围环境的照片中。在光线不足和对比度较高的情况下,清晰度会有所下降,但图像增亮处理得当。尽管如此,该款相机却完全无能为力,在光照度为 1 勒克斯、图像中没有任何光源的情况下,无法检测到任何东西。

该手机能以高达 1080p 和 30 fps 的速度录制视频。自动对焦速度较快,但在录制过程中有时会出现追焦现象。

背面还有一个微距镜头,可进行超近距离拍摄。该镜头的分辨率很低,仅为 200 万像素,但可用于快照。

前置 800 万像素摄像头可在光线良好的环境中拍摄出漂亮的自拍照。图像增亮效果可以稍好一些,但使用该摄像头拍摄的照片可以放大而不会有太大的质量损失。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera: plantMain camera: surroundingsMain camera: low-light
ColorChecker
24 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
28 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G24 Power: 13.92 ∆E min: 4.05 - max: 28.02 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
55 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
64.6 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
67.2 ∆E
65.4 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
49.3 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
77.9 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
45.3 ∆E
94.4 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G24 Power: 47.54 ∆E min: 13.76 - max: 94.36 ∆E

显示屏 - Moto G24 Power 的像素较低

子像素图像
子像素图像

IPS 显示屏是 Moto G24 Power 明显削减成本的一个方面:该面板的分辨率仅为 1,612 x 720,低于许多同价位设备的分辨率。此外,Moto G24 Power 的 AMOLED 屏幕 三星Galaxy A15 4G小米Redmi Note 13 4G更亮,因此更适合户外使用。

尽管如此,Moto G24 Power 显示屏的平均峰值亮度为 497 cd/m²,在许多情况下仍然足够明亮。遗憾的是,显示屏上的黑色区域亮度也略高,这导致它们看起来更灰暗,对比度也更低。

我们注意到显示屏有明显的蓝色调,给人一种冷色调。你可以使用可用设置在一定程度上抵消这种影响。

我们没有发现任何 PWM 闪烁。对闪烁比较敏感的用户在使用这款手机时应该不会有任何问题。

502
cd/m²
516
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 516 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 497.4 cd/m² Minimum: 5.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 499 cd/m²
Contrast: 1018:1 (Black: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.82 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.073
Motorola Moto G24 Power
IPS, 1612x720, 6.56
Samsung Galaxy A15
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Motorola Moto G34
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Response Times
95%
94%
-36%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39 ?(22.1, 16.9)
2 ?(1, 1)
95%
2.2 ?(1.1, 1.1)
94%
71.3 ?(48, 23.3)
-83%
Response Time Black / White *
28.6 ?(15.8, 12.8)
1.7 ?(0.8, 0.9)
94%
1.6 ?(0.7, 0.9)
94%
25.5 ?(13.7, 11.8)
11%
PWM Frequency
187
389.2
Screen
43%
66%
20%
Brightness middle
499
731
46%
940
88%
523
5%
Brightness
497
711
43%
922
86%
512
3%
Brightness Distribution
93
93
0%
96
3%
95
2%
Black Level *
0.49
0.47
4%
Contrast
1018
1113
9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.82
2.31
52%
1.2
75%
1.89
61%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.76
3.51
55%
2.28
71%
4.63
40%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.7
1.7
64%
1.4
70%
3.1
34%
Gamma
2.073 106%
2.091 105%
2.27 97%
2.262 97%
CCT
7445 87%
6424 101%
6503 100%
6471 100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
69% / 56%
80% / 73%
-8% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.8 ms rise
↘ 12.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.1 ms rise
↘ 16.9 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17844 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩空间
CalMAN 色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命--耐力是优势

Moto G24 Power 的性能由 联发科SoC 驱动。这款手机在基准测试中的表现相当令人失望:在我们的对比中,它的性能落后于许多同价位的设备。虽然在大多数情况下你都能顺利浏览菜单,但要求稍高的任务往往会出现卡顿和等待时间。

在浏览网页时,你可能会发现大型网站的加载时间相当长,而且在滚动时,图片的显示往往需要一定的时间。这很可能也是由于板载的 eMMC 闪存速度较慢,在速度方面无法与对比设备中的任何存储解决方案相提并论。

即使在长时间负载后,机箱的最高温度仍低于 40°C(104°F),这并不令人担忧。3DMark 压力测试表明,即使在长时间负载的情况下,SoC 也没有出现节流现象。

Moto G24 Power 在底部边缘使用了专用扬声器,并通过耳部扬声器产生立体声音效。扬声器的音量足以在中等大小的房间内使用。它们的声音很好听,还能提供一些深沉的中音,但你不应该对它们的低音抱有期望。通过 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙连接扬声器或耳机,大多能获得更饱满的音效。无线音频有许多编解码器可供选择,包括高保真选项和 Opus 和 LHDC 等更奇特的编解码器。

6,000 毫安时电池是 Moto G24 Power 的一大亮点。我们的电池测试也证明了这一点:在显示屏亮度设定的情况下,该手机通过 Wi-Fi 浏览网页的续航时间达到了令人印象深刻的 18 小时 23 分钟,远远超过了我们对比的所有其他设备。由于手机的充电功率高达 30 瓦,因此完全充满电池不超过两小时。

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=110, last 2 years)
1370 Points +229%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
907 Points +118%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
728 Points +75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
478 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
416 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (366 - 416, n=3)
398 Points -4%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=110, last 2 years)
3788 Points +166%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2020 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1942 Points +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1544 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
1423 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1251 - 1423, n=3)
1330 Points -7%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=216, last 2 years)
915 Points +156%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
676 Points +89%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
552 Points +55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
437 Points +22%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (341 - 437, n=14)
359 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
357 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=216, last 2 years)
3000 Points +122%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1879 Points +39%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1794 Points +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1775 Points +32%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
1349 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1184 - 1363, n=14)
1311 Points -3%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=213, last 2 years)
11846 Points +26%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
11314 Points +20%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
9437 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9195 Points -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (6596 - 9437, n=12)
8133 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
7305 Points -23%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=180, last 2 years)
6732 Points +368%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2568 Points +79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1597 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
1438 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1393 - 1453, n=13)
1433 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=180, last 2 years)
9731 Points +670%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2411 Points +91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1427 Points +13%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
1263 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1234 - 1281, n=13)
1262 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 25748, n=180, last 2 years)
4356 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3329 Points +19%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
2790 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2739 Points -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2533 - 2811, n=13)
2697 Points -3%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 13896, n=135, last 2 years)
2643 Points +262%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1212 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1195 Points +63%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (706 - 761, n=14)
732 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
731 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
645 Points -12%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=202, last 2 years)
6322 Points +772%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1206 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1094 Points +51%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (698 - 757, n=14)
730 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
725 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
634 Points -13%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5226, n=206, last 2 years)
1704 Points +811%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
364 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
332 Points +78%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
187 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (181 - 193, n=13)
186.3 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
139 Points -26%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=202, last 2 years)
1705 Points +817%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
354 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
326 Points +75%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
186 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (178 - 191, n=13)
184.2 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
135 Points -27%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=225, last 2 years)
44.1 fps +215%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
38 fps +171%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
14 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
14 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (7.5 - 22, n=15)
12.4 fps -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
9.5 fps -32%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=225, last 2 years)
64.3 fps +614%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
21 fps +133%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
16 fps +78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
10 fps +11%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (8 - 9.7, n=15)
9.1 fps +1%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
9 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=225, last 2 years)
32.8 fps +343%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
24 fps +224%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8.9 fps +20%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (5 - 13, n=15)
7.81 fps +6%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
7.4 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
5.5 fps -26%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=225, last 2 years)
25.7 fps +679%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
8.2 fps +148%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.9 fps +79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
3.6 fps +9%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (3.1 - 3.5, n=15)
3.37 fps +2%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
3.3 fps
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 42, n=217, last 2 years)
12.4 fps +727%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3.6 fps +140%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2.5 fps +67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1.5 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
1.5 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1.4 - 1.5, n=8)
1.488 fps -1%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)
33565 Points +118%
Motorola Moto G34
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
31647 Points +105%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
21890 Points +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
15900 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
15430 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (10299 - 15430, n=12)
12698 Points -18%
Motorola Moto G24 PowerSamsung Galaxy A15Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GMotorola Moto G34Average 256 GB eMMC 5.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
150%
142%
90%
-13%
276%
Sequential Read 256KB
297
967.8
226%
909.8
206%
524.1
76%
266 ?(240 - 297, n=4)
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB
253.2
488.5
93%
606.3
139%
495
95%
239 ?(225 - 253, n=4)
-6%
Random Read 4KB
100
233.2
133%
177.1
77%
192.1
92%
86.2 ?(76.3 - 100, n=4)
-14%
Random Write 4KB
92.2
229.6
149%
228
147%
180.2
95%
73.9 ?(67.5 - 92.2, n=4)
-20%
Max. Load
 39.6 °C34.7 °C33.7 °C 
 38.9 °C34.1 °C33.4 °C 
 38 °C34.8 °C33.9 °C 
Maximum: 39.6 °C
Average: 35.7 °C
33.5 °C36.4 °C37.1 °C
33.2 °C35.8 °C38.1 °C
32.4 °C35.8 °C37.2 °C
Maximum: 38.1 °C
Average: 35.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.2 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.


热图前端
热图前端
热图返回
热图返回

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

01234567Tooltip
Motorola Moto G24 Power Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.131 (1.123-1.137)
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.05 (1.992-2.08)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.814 (0.81-0.82)
Motorola Moto G34 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.15-2.18)
Motorola Moto G24 Power Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.39 (4.36-4.4)
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.47 (7.42-7.49)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.91 (3.89-3.93)
Motorola Moto G34 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.24 (7.23-7.28)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.237.82533.231.33127.127.34030.532.9503436.96325.823.5801717.210019.920.312525.426.416017.334.320010.640.125014.448.73158.152.64007.453.85007.861630962.680012.566.4100017.271.712509.469.916001068.820009.865.7250010.364.431501162.940001266.5500012.673.1630013.571.6800014.467.11000015.269.71250015.966.91600016.850.6SPL24.880.5N0.647.3median 12.5median 64.4Delta3.29.837.636.237.63630.731.633.429.438.434.824.528.116.519.215.819.313.119.814.624.88.629.67.834.67.244.88.553.410.156.410.961.110.96912.667.49.169.39.663.710.166.210.865.712.770.413.27615.277.214.374.515.367.616.162.516.365.217.253.324.983.20.650.8median 12.6median 63.72.912hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G24 PowerMotorola Moto G34
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G24 Power audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G34 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Motorola Moto G24 Power
6000 mAh
1103 min
Motorola Moto G34
5000 mAh
995 min -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (424 - 2844, n=227, last 2 years)
916 min -17%
Samsung Galaxy A15
5000 mAh
885 min -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
5000 mAh
742 min -33%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
18h 23min

Pros

+ 电池寿命长
+ 快速充电技术
+ 坚固耐用的机身
+ 大量存储空间
+ 保证 3 年安全更新

Cons

- 低分辨率显示器
- ... 色彩准确度低
- 存储迟缓
- 处理器功率低

结论 - 持久耐用,但性能欠佳

摩托罗拉 Moto G24 Power 评测
摩托罗拉 Moto G24 Power 评测

摩托罗拉 Moto G24 Power 有很多值得称道的地方:例如,时尚的机身和材料之间的无缝衔接,或者大容量电池在不增加过多重量或体积的情况下提供了较长的续航时间。除此以外,你还能获得Android ,据说还有三年的安全更新、不错的扬声器、不闪烁的显示屏,以及同类手机中速度最快的充电技术。

丰富的存储空间同样是一大亮点,甚至可以通过 microSD 插槽进行扩展。Moto G24 Power 还配备了 NFC 功能,这在经济型中端手机中并不常见。

尽管如此,Moto G24 Power 可能并不适合所有人,因为它的显示屏只有 720p 分辨率,色彩还原的准确度也不高。从手机的性能上也可以看出削减成本的措施:与同价位的设备相比,处理器和存储设备都显得相当迟缓。

Moto G24 Power 的售价不到 200 欧元(195 美元),在时尚的机身内提供了超长的电池续航时间和充足的存储空间。不过,制造商在显示屏和性能方面有所欠缺。

在此之前,我们先来看看其他的替代产品:如果你想继续使用摩托罗拉的产品,可以选择 摩托 G34可在不明显影响电池续航时间的情况下增强性能。三星 三星Galaxy A15 4G也能提供不错的续航时间,而且还配备了 AMOLED 屏幕。

价格和供应情况

摩托罗拉 Moto G24 Power 现已在一些零售商处有售。在撰写这篇评论时,这款手机在中欧和北美的亚马逊上的售价约为190 欧元195 美元

Motorola Moto G24 Power - 04/25/2024 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 69%
Weight
88%
Battery
93%
Display
84%
Games Performance
15 / 64 → 23%
Application Performance
68 / 86 → 79%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
54%
Average
74%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 摩托罗拉 Moto G24 Power 评测--一款经济实惠、电池寿命长的手机
Florian Schmitt, 2024-04-27 (Update: 2024-04-27)