Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy Tab A8 LTE (2022)平板电脑评测 - 一个强大的全能型产品，价格明显低于300美元

新版。 三星更新了其最受欢迎的平板电脑之一。Galaxy Tab A8继Galaxy Tab A7之后，正式从229欧元（约合人民币259元）起售，并与之前的前辈一样拥有广泛的设备清单。我们的测试表明，购买这款10.5英寸的平板电脑是否值得。
Android Tablet Touchscreen

三星为其经济实惠的Galaxy Tab A系列注入了新的活力。这从10.5英寸的Galaxy Tab A8开始，它是10.4英寸Tab A7的继任者。 Galaxy Tab A7.最大的更新在于处理器和存储。Galaxy Tab A8使用 Unisoc T618四核SoC，根据制造商的说法，这应该使它比前代产品快10%左右。现在也有64和128GB的存储空间，而不是最大32GB的存储空间。

三星在其平板电脑的其他设备上没有什么变化。原则上，这应该是可以的，因为去年三星Galaxy Tab A7已经以其非常好的性价比给我们留下了深刻印象。

现在，Galaxy Tab A8也带来了同样好的前提，正式起价229欧元（约259美元），而且还有LTE版本。LCD TFT继续提供1920 x 1200像素的分辨率，和以前一样，有四个扬声器，一个500万像素的自拍相机，和一个800万像素的主摄像头。但是，这些相当谨慎的更新是否足以让它在2022年的中端平板电脑领域也保持竞争力？我们在这次测试中找到答案。

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Galaxy Tab A Series)
Processor
UNISOC T618 8 x 2 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G52 MP2
Memory
3072 MB 
Display
10.50 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 216 PPI, capacitive, TFT-LCD, WUXGA, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 17.8 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro sensor, geomagnetic sensor, hall sensor, Wi-Fi Direct
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66), Body SAR 0.92 W/kg, single SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.9 x 246.8 x 161.9
Battery
7040 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix autofocus, videos up to [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: quad speakers with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: virtual, 7.8 W charger, USB cable, SIM tool, quick start guide, warranty information, One UI, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
508 g, Power Supply: 35 g
Price
279 Euro
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81 %
02/2022
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
T618, Mali-G52 MP2		508 g6.9 mm10.50"1920x1200
74.3 %
09/2021
Blackview Tab 10
Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320		523 g8.4 mm10.10"1920x1080
83.4 %
10/2021
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4		655 g7.9 mm11.00"2000x1200
81.7 %
10/2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
SD 662, Adreno 610		477 g7 mm10.40"2000x1200
79.9 %
11/2021
Teclast T40 Plus
T618, Mali-G52 MP2		455 g10 mm10.40"2000x1200

外壳 - 金属外壳现在也有粉红色的。

从在线供应商那里，在本次测试时，最小设备版本的三星Galaxy Tab A8已经接近200欧元（约226美元）的大关了。然而，当看到10.5英寸的中档平板电脑时，你并没有真正注意到这个低价。

与Galaxy Tab A7Galaxy Tab A8被装在一个优雅的铝制外壳中，显示出良好的做工，并为平板电脑提供了高稳定性。背面的金属表面只被一条细长的塑料带打断，该塑料带穿过平板电脑的整个宽度，位于800万像素主摄像头上方。

由于宽度约为1厘米（约0.4英寸），显示屏周围的边框很薄，足以创造一个良好的视觉印象，导致该平板电脑的屏占比达到80%（Galaxy Tab A7：79%）。同时，它们还允许将Galaxy Tab A8握在手中，而不会意外地在TFT显示屏上产生输入。

Galaxy Tab A8的厚度为6.9毫米（约0.27英寸），比Galaxy Tab A7的厚度薄了很多。另一方面，与前代产品相比，尺寸略有增长，图像对角线从10.4英寸增加到10.5英寸。在长度方面，Galaxy Tab A8比Galaxy Tab A7多出0.8毫米（约0.03英寸），而宽度增加了4.5毫米（约0.18英寸）。重量也从WiFi版的460克（约16.2盎司）略微增加到477克（约16.8盎司）。我们正在测试的LTE版本带来508克（约17.9盎司）的重量。

三星提供Galaxy Tab A8，颜色为深灰色、银色和粉红色。

尺寸比较

❌
256.8 mm 169 mm 7.9 mm 655 g248 mm 157 mm 10 mm 455 g247.6 mm 157.4 mm 7 mm 477 g246.8 mm 161.9 mm 6.9 mm 508 g243 mm 162 mm 8.4 mm 523 g

设备--Galaxy Tab A8中高达4GB的内存和128GB的存储。

三星Galaxy Tab A8有WiFi和LTE版本。在存储容量为32GB的最小型号中，WiFi版10.5英寸平板电脑的官方价格为229欧元（约合人民币259元），而LTE版为279欧元（约合人民币316元）。三星只在其网络商店提供32GB存储空间的平板电脑，那些想购买64或128GB存储空间的人必须从其他在线供应商那里获得。虽然两个较大的存储型号都配备了4GB的内存，但32GB的型号只有3GB的内存。

在我们的32GB测试单元中，剩余的可用存储空间并不是很大，只有18GB。然而，你可以通过使用一个高达1TB的microSD卡来扩展存储。除了媒体数据外，你还可以将应用数据转移到卡上。

幸运的是，Galaxy Tab 8还提供了前代产品的3.5毫米音频端口和其支持杜比全景声的四个扬声器。和以前一样，USB-C端口也以USB-2.0的速度运行，并支持USB OTG。

微型SD卡读卡器

microSD读卡器的速度很快，超过了这个平板电脑价格级别的平均水平，在复制测试中明显超过了对比设备。使用我们的Angelbird AV Pro V60参考存储卡，Galaxy Tab A8在连续读取和写入方面也取得了良好的数值。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
49.18 MB/s ∼100%
Teclast T40 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
26.36 MB/s ∼54% -46%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
22 MB/s ∼45% -55%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
; SDCard Sequential Write; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.7 (13.3-40.3)
; SDCard Sequential Read; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (37.9-86.8)

软件 -Android 11和One UI 3.1用于三星Galaxy Tab A8

Galaxy Tab A8使用Android 11，带有3.1版的三星One UI用户界面。在我们测试的时候（2022年2月中旬），Android 安全补丁是1月1日的水平，所以仍然相当及时。

由于其DRM Widevine L1认证，Galaxy Tab A8也能以高清质量再现流媒体。Galaxy Tab A8也可以作为家庭平板电脑使用。一个用户界面就可以设置多个用户，通过三星儿童，你还可以得到一个儿童模式，并有相应的调整内容。

除了谷歌和三星的应用程序外，微软的Office、OneDrive和Outlook也预装在该平板电脑上。它们还有Netflix和Spotify作为额外的第三方应用程序。除OneDrive外，所有新增软件都可以卸载。OneDrive只能被停用，所以它将继续占用约170MB的备用内部存储空间。

通信和GNSS - 快速的WLAN但不准确的GPS

Galaxy Tab A8使用蓝牙5.0和WiFi 5进行无线通信。在LTE版本中，除了2G和3G之外，还有一个额外的通信模块，也支持15个LTE频段。在0.92瓦/千克，SAR值相对较低。

在WiFi网络中，Galaxy Tab A8实现了坚实的传输速率，大约是在那些 Blackview Tab 10和 Teclast T40 Plus.然而，这款平板电脑并不比它的前辈Galaxy Tab A7快。由于我们使用新的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器（而不是之前使用的Netgear Nighthawk AX12）测量了三星平板电脑的WLAN速度，结果以单独的柱状图描述。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash
332 (310min - 353max) MBit/s ∼100%
Blackview Tab 10
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s ∼93%
Teclast T40 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
305 (97min - 372max) MBit/s ∼92%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
140 (55min - 209max) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 receive AX12
Blackview Tab 10
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash
355 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash
329 (323min - 333max) MBit/s ∼93%
Teclast T40 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
327 (311min - 331max) MBit/s ∼92%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
141 (83min - 201max) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
325 (163min - 328max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
349 (178min - 357max) MBit/s ∼100%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (163-328)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø343 (178-357)
室内的GPS接收
室内的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收

Galaxy Tab A8使用GPS（L1）、Glonass（L1）、Galileo（E1）和Beidou（B1）卫星导航系统确定其当前位置。然而，这在我们的测试中效果相当差。在室内和室外都花了相当长的时间，直到平板电脑显示出一个位置，这也不是很准确。这意味着Galaxy Tab A8只适合在非常有限的范围内进行导航，这一点我们必须在强制性的自行车旅行中找到答案。在大约10公里（约6.2英里）长的自行车骑行中，这款平板电脑没有成功创建一个satfix--前代产品在这方面要成功得多。

相机 - 一个良好的自拍相机，但主相机表现平平

用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片

Galaxy Tab A8的相机设备与之相比没有变化。 Galaxy Tab A7.自拍相机的分辨率为500万像素，在光线良好的条件下进行视频聊天时表现良好。 背面有一个800万像素的摄像头，具有自动对焦功能，但没有任何额外的摄影辅助设备，如图像稳定器或闪光灯。

总的来说，我们喜欢自拍相机比800万像素的主摄像头好得多，后者也依赖于良好的照明，以便成功拍摄相当可接受的记录。色彩略微过于饱和，尽管这在整体上看起来并不太糟糕。 由于积极的锐化，精细的图像细节被简单地磨平了，使一些照片看起来就像你使用了一个模糊的过滤器。 800万像素的相机也完全被微弱的光线条件过度消耗了。与此相反，例子中的 泰克莱斯特T40 Plus的例子表明，经济实惠的平板电脑和一个好的相机并不相互排斥。

用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用自拍相机拍摄的照片
用自拍相机拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Szene 1Tageslicht-Szene 25-facher ZoomLowlight-Aufnahme

我们还在受控的实验室条件下对Galaxy Tab A8的主摄像头进行了详细检查。在最佳光线条件下（顶部颜色图），相机相对准确地再现了颜色，在浅灰色和深灰色调方面特别成功。在弱光条件下（1Lux下的底色图），准确性完全消失，之前还原得相当详细的测试图现在完全无法辨认了。

ColorChecker
14 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
13 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
13 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022: 9.82 ∆E min: 2.35 - max: 15.82 ∆E
ColorChecker
29 ∆E
54.5 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
65.3 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
77.2 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022: 46.85 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 92.94 ∆E

配件和保修 - 只包括一个7.8瓦的充电器

三星的平板电脑包括一个7.8瓦的充电器，一条USB线（A型到C型），一个SIM卡工具，一份快速启动手册，以及一份保修单据。

作为一个可选配件，三星还提供15瓦的充电器。，价格约为25欧元（约28美元）。

三星Galaxy Tab A8的保修期为24个月。

输入设备和操作--对日常工作来说足够快速

尽管Unisoc T618和3GB内存并没有把Galaxy Tab A8变成火箭，但它们在很大程度上确保了操作的顺利进行，而且平板电脑对输入的反应很快。只有在启动系统后，情况才会变得有点迟缓，因为没有加载所有的模块，但这在大约15秒后就完成了。

然而，在操作过程中可以注意到，这款平板电脑只包含eMMC闪存，RAM的数量有限。应用程序的加载可能需要一些时间，在几个打开的应用程序之间的切换有时会略有延迟。

该平板电脑不提供指纹传感器。你可以使用二维面部扫描进行生物识别。在足够明亮的光线条件下，人脸识别可以迅速成功，没有任何问题。

键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 纵向
键盘 - 纵向

显示屏 - 一个普通的TFT LCD

子像素网格
子像素网格

在最小尺寸的Galaxy Tab A8中，三星使用了与Tab A7不同的显示屏。 Galaxy Tab A7.虽然这仍然是一个TFT LCD，但它现在的分辨率是1920 x 1200像素，而不是之前的2000 x 1200像素。

平均345.6cd/m²的TFT LCD比前代产品略微明亮，前代产品的平均亮度为337.1cd/m²。在APL50测量中，在均匀分布的明亮和黑暗的图像区域，Galaxy Tab A8达到了368 cd/m²的最大值，当亮度传感器被停用时，该值增加到372 cd/m²。我们在最低亮度水平下测得9.18 cd/m²的高、高于平均值的数值。

由于该显示器不使用脉冲宽度调制来控制亮度，它也适合敏感的用户，没有任何限制。

352
cd/m²		345
cd/m²		338
cd/m²
342
cd/m²		368
cd/m²		335
cd/m²
354
cd/m²		340
cd/m²		336
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 368 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 345.6 cd/m² Minimum: 9.18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 368 cd/m²
Contrast: 603:1 (Black: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.9 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 7.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
91.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.50		Blackview Tab 10
IPS, 1920x1080, 10.10		Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 11.00		Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
TFT-LCD, 2000x1200, 10.40		Teclast T40 Plus
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.40
Screen
-6%
41%
34%
42%
Brightness middle
368
467
27%
380
3%
365
-1%
496
35%
Brightness
346
445
29%
376
9%
337
-3%
486
40%
Brightness Distribution
91
89
-2%
89
-2%
82
-10%
92
1%
Black Level *
0.61
0.66
-8%
0.24
61%
0.26
57%
0.4
34%
Contrast
603
708
17%
1583
163%
1404
133%
1240
106%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.9
9.9
-43%
4.61
33%
4.5
35%
3.1
55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.4
15.66
-37%
8.77
23%
7.8
32%
7.6
33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.7
9.9
-29%
5.1
34%
5.3
31%
5.1
34%
Gamma
2.16 102%
1.72 128%
2.248 98%
2.12 104%
2.33 94%
CCT
8547 76%
9142 71%
7966 82%
7702 84%
6819 95%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21792 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

除了最低限度地提高了亮度之外，改用新的显示屏并没有给三星平板电脑带来任何好处。由于黑值为0.61cd/m²，明显过高，Galaxy Tab A8只能达到608:1的平庸对比度，导致色彩显得有些苍白。其他图像参数，如色温和色彩及灰度再现的准确性，也比前代产品差。

色彩精度（sRGB目标色彩空间）
色彩精度（sRGB目标色彩空间）
色彩空间（sRGB目标色彩空间）
色彩空间（sRGB目标色彩空间）
灰度（sRGB目标色彩空间）
灰度（sRGB目标色彩空间）
饱和度（sRGB目标色彩空间）
饱和度（sRGB目标色彩空间）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
35.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.2 ms rise
↘ 18.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
53.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24.4 ms rise
↘ 29.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

由于其相对较低的亮度储备，Galaxy Tab A8不是很适合户外使用。因此，如果你必须在户外使用它，你应该寻找一个尽可能阴凉的地方。

在可视角度的稳定性方面，TFT LCD基本上做得很好，即使在非常陡峭的视角下，你仍然可以毫无障碍地识别图像内容。然而，在日常操作中，你应该总是尽量保持平板电脑与你的观察角度垂直，因为否则它很快就会变暗。

多云天气下的户外使用
多云天气下的户外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 正如承诺的那样，比Galaxy Tab A7高10%。

ǞǞǞUnisoc T618Galaxy Tab A8是2019年的旧版SoC，也被用于 譬如，Teclast T40 Plus，比如说。结合3GB的内存（64GB存储模型开始为4GB），三星平板电脑能够顺利地显示简单的日常应用程序，如Chrome或YouTube。在四核的SoC中， ARM Mali G52 MP2处理图形计算。

测试显示，Galaxy Tab A8的运行速度比 Galaxy Tab A7正如三星所承诺的那样。然而，其计算性能并没有达到 联发科Helio G90T中运行的 联想Yoga Tab 11.有趣的是，Galaxy Tab A8在与Teclast P40 Plus的SoC竞争中也输了。虽然两款平板电脑使用相同的处理器，但在Galaxy Tab A8中，它的运行速度总是略微降低。在合成基准测试和浏览器基准测试中，Teclast P40 Plus的运行速度总是略微快一些。

Geekbench 5.3 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | Antutu v9 | AnTuTu v8 | AImark | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (133 - 1719, n=46, last 2 years)
695 Points ∼34% +90%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
483 Points ∼24% +32%
Teclast T40 Plus
384 Points ∼19% +5%
Average UNISOC T618 (365 - 393, n=5)
382 Points ∼19% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
365 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
316 Points ∼15% -13%
Blackview Tab 10
152 Points ∼7% -58%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (455 - 7378, n=46, last 2 years)
2364 Points ∼8% +92%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
1593 Points ∼6% +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1381 Points ∼5% +12%
Average UNISOC T618 (1229 - 1461, n=5)
1329 Points ∼5% +8%
Teclast T40 Plus
1309 Points ∼5% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1229 Points ∼4%
Blackview Tab 10
780 Points ∼3% -37%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (4564 - 13996, n=24, last 2 years)
8932 Points ∼48% +20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
8435 Points ∼45% +13%
Teclast T40 Plus
8414 Points ∼45% +13%
Average UNISOC T618 (7447 - 8414, n=4)
8125 Points ∼44% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7447 Points ∼40%
Blackview Tab 10
4564 Points ∼25% -39%
Work 2.0 performance score
Average of class Tablet (4509 - 12603, n=21, last 2 years)
7113 Points ∼46% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
6937 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
6193 Points ∼40% -11%
Average UNISOC T618 (82 - 6937, n=2)
3510 Points ∼23% -49%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3294 Points ∼29% +58%
Average of class Tablet (504 - 9238, n=29, last 2 years)
2692 Points ∼24% +29%
Teclast T40 Plus
2163 Points ∼19% +4%
Average UNISOC T618 (2084 - 2219, n=5)
2158 Points ∼19% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2084 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1858 Points ∼17% -11%
Blackview Tab 10
699 Points ∼6% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3343 Points ∼20% +71%
Average of class Tablet (453 - 14283, n=29, last 2 years)
3210 Points ∼19% +64%
Teclast T40 Plus
2028 Points ∼12% +4%
Average UNISOC T618 (1958 - 2065, n=5)
2016 Points ∼12% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1958 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1729 Points ∼10% -12%
Blackview Tab 10
630 Points ∼4% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3238 Points ∼60% +20%
Teclast T40 Plus
2822 Points ∼52% +5%
Average UNISOC T618 (2601 - 3002, n=5)
2793 Points ∼52% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2692 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2517 Points ∼46% -7%
Average of class Tablet (674 - 4482, n=29, last 2 years)
2455 Points ∼45% -9%
Blackview Tab 10
1136 Points ∼21% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (527 - 13682, n=39, last 2 years)
4541 Points ∼27% +116%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3122 Points ∼19% +48%
Teclast T40 Plus
2185 Points ∼13% +4%
Average UNISOC T618 (2105 - 2228, n=5)
2160 Points ∼13% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2105 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1906 Points ∼11% -9%
Blackview Tab 10
835 Points ∼5% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (475 - 42751, n=39, last 2 years)
7865 Points ∼18% +302%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3055 Points ∼7% +56%
Teclast T40 Plus
2033 Points ∼5% +4%
Average UNISOC T618 (1957 - 2056, n=5)
2016 Points ∼5% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1957 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1790 Points ∼4% -9%
Blackview Tab 10
774 Points ∼2% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3346 Points ∼49% +17%
Teclast T40 Plus
2961 Points ∼43% +3%
Average of class Tablet (806 - 5623, n=39, last 2 years)
2949 Points ∼43% +3%
Average UNISOC T618 (2611 - 3148, n=5)
2910 Points ∼42% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2862 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2466 Points ∼36% -14%
Blackview Tab 10
1152 Points ∼17% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2503 Points ∼12% +76%
Average of class Tablet (281 - 7098, n=29, last 2 years)
1985 Points ∼10% +39%
Teclast T40 Plus
1471 Points ∼7% +3%
Average UNISOC T618 (1425 - 1492, n=5)
1457 Points ∼7% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1425 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1176 Points ∼6% -17%
Blackview Tab 10
411 Points ∼2% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2374 Points ∼21% +90%
Average of class Tablet (236 - 9612, n=30, last 2 years)
2058 Points ∼18% +64%
Teclast T40 Plus
1291 Points ∼11% +3%
Average UNISOC T618 (1252 - 1303, n=5)
1282 Points ∼11% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1252 Points ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1022 Points ∼9% -18%
Blackview Tab 10
348 Points ∼3% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3192 Points ∼54% +15%
Teclast T40 Plus
2866 Points ∼49% +4%
Average UNISOC T618 (2643 - 3035, n=5)
2819 Points ∼48% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2768 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2497 Points ∼42% -10%
Average of class Tablet (369 - 4201, n=30, last 2 years)
2455 Points ∼42% -11%
Blackview Tab 10
1130 Points ∼19% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (305 - 9630, n=41, last 2 years)
3661 Points ∼32% +150%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2609 Points ∼23% +78%
Teclast T40 Plus
1526 Points ∼13% +4%
Average UNISOC T618 (1463 - 1569, n=5)
1518 Points ∼13% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1463 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1197 Points ∼10% -18%
Blackview Tab 10
495 Points ∼4% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (258 - 25707, n=41, last 2 years)
5138 Points ∼20% +300%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2476 Points ∼10% +93%
Teclast T40 Plus
1338 Points ∼5% +4%
Average UNISOC T618 (1284 - 1369, n=5)
1336 Points ∼5% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1284 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1043 Points ∼4% -19%
Blackview Tab 10
425 Points ∼2% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3492 Points ∼44% +22%
Teclast T40 Plus
3002 Points ∼38% +5%
Average of class Tablet (443 - 5634, n=41, last 2 years)
2925 Points ∼37% +2%
Average UNISOC T618 (2526 - 3202, n=5)
2920 Points ∼37% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2865 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2471 Points ∼31% -14%
Blackview Tab 10
1171 Points ∼15% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2681 Points ∼20% +80%
Average of class Tablet (488 - 6292, n=28, last 2 years)
2023 Points ∼15% +36%
Teclast T40 Plus
1538 Points ∼11% +3%
Average UNISOC T618 (1463 - 1552, n=5)
1512 Points ∼11% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1488 Points ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1114 Points ∼8% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (400 - 25909, n=28, last 2 years)
2849 Points ∼11% +113%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2537 Points ∼10% +89%
Teclast T40 Plus
1383 Points ∼5% +3%
Average UNISOC T618 (1324 - 1385, n=5)
1359 Points ∼5% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1340 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
971 Points ∼4% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2738 Points ∼52% +13%
Teclast T40 Plus
2532 Points ∼48% +5%
Average UNISOC T618 (2193 - 2685, n=5)
2475 Points ∼47% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2422 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2302 Points ∼44% -5%
Average of class Tablet (230 - 3285, n=28, last 2 years)
2287 Points ∼43% -6%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Tablet (371 - 17263, n=29, last 2 years)
4610 Points ∼4% +547%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
1363 Points ∼1% +91%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
712 Points ∼1%
Teclast T40 Plus
711 Points ∼1% 0%
Average UNISOC T618 (693 - 712, n=4)
706 Points ∼1% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
371 Points ∼0% -48%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (366 - 18326, n=27, last 2 years)
5400 Points ∼5% +663%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
1371 Points ∼1% +94%
Teclast T40 Plus
712 Points ∼1% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
708 Points ∼1%
Average UNISOC T618 (694 - 712, n=4)
706 Points ∼1% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Points ∼0% -100%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Tablet (135 - 5035, n=25, last 2 years)
1569 Points ∼3% +753%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
372 Points ∼1% +102%
Teclast T40 Plus
185 Points ∼0% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
184 Points ∼0%
Average UNISOC T618 (182 - 185, n=3)
183.7 Points ∼0% 0%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (132 - 4975, n=25, last 2 years)
1520 Points ∼3% +749%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
376 Points ∼1% +110%
Teclast T40 Plus
182 Points ∼0% +2%
Average UNISOC T618 (179 - 182, n=3)
180.3 Points ∼0% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
179 Points ∼0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (19 - 120, n=40, last 2 years)
62.5 fps ∼2% +60%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
58 fps ∼2% +49%
Teclast T40 Plus
40 fps ∼1% +3%
Average UNISOC T618 (37 - 42, n=5)
39.4 fps ∼1% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
39 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
33 fps ∼1% -15%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (14 - 588, n=40, last 2 years)
168.1 fps ∼1% +310%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
79 fps ∼1% +93%
Teclast T40 Plus
43 fps ∼0% +5%
Average UNISOC T618 (41 - 44, n=5)
42.4 fps ∼0% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
41 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
35 fps ∼0% -15%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (9.4 - 120, n=39, last 2 years)
47.6 fps ∼13% +90%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
42 fps ∼12% +68%
Teclast T40 Plus
25 fps ∼7% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
25 fps ∼7%
Average UNISOC T618 (22 - 25, n=5)
24.4 fps ∼7% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
18 fps ∼5% -28%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (6.9 - 345, n=40, last 2 years)
95.6 fps ∼7% +268%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
46 fps ∼4% +77%
Teclast T40 Plus
26 fps ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
26 fps ∼2%
Average UNISOC T618 (26 - 26, n=5)
26 fps ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
19 fps ∼1% -27%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (6.3 - 107, n=40, last 2 years)
34.2 fps ∼1% +128%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
26 fps ∼1% +73%
Teclast T40 Plus
15 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
15 fps ∼0%
Average UNISOC T618 (13 - 15, n=5)
14.6 fps ∼0% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
12 fps ∼0% -20%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (4.7 - 229, n=40, last 2 years)
65.3 fps ∼1% +335%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
29 fps ∼1% +93%
Average UNISOC T618 (15 - 16, n=5)
15.2 fps ∼0% +1%
Teclast T40 Plus
15 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
15 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
13 fps ∼0% -13%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 87, n=40, last 2 years)
23.4 fps ∼1% +154%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
16 fps ∼0% +74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
9.2 fps ∼0%
Average UNISOC T618 (8.1 - 9.2, n=5)
8.52 fps ∼0% -7%
Teclast T40 Plus
8.3 fps ∼0% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
6.7 fps ∼0% -27%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.1 - 153.5, n=40, last 2 years)
40.7 fps ∼0% +320%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
18 fps ∼0% +86%
Average UNISOC T618 (8.7 - 13, n=5)
9.86 fps ∼0% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
9.7 fps ∼0%
Teclast T40 Plus
8.9 fps ∼0% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
7.2 fps ∼0% -26%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2 - 75, n=44, last 2 years)
16.6 fps ∼11% +177%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
10 fps ∼6% +67%
Teclast T40 Plus
6 fps ∼4% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
6 fps ∼4%
Average UNISOC T618 (5.4 - 6.2, n=5)
5.92 fps ∼4% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
4.6 fps ∼3% -23%
Blackview Tab 10
2.2 fps ∼1% -63%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.87 - 70, n=44, last 2 years)
15.8 fps ∼5% +339%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
6.5 fps ∼2% +81%
Teclast T40 Plus
3.7 fps ∼1% +3%
Average UNISOC T618 (3.6 - 3.7, n=5)
3.66 fps ∼1% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
3.6 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2.9 fps ∼1% -19%
Blackview Tab 10
1.4 fps ∼0% -61%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (3.2 - 102, n=44, last 2 years)
23.8 fps ∼12% +140%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
17 fps ∼8% +72%
Average UNISOC T618 (9.7 - 11, n=5)
10.1 fps ∼5% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
9.9 fps ∼5%
Teclast T40 Plus
9.7 fps ∼5% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
7.8 fps ∼4% -21%
Blackview Tab 10
3.6 fps ∼2% -64%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.4 - 191, n=44, last 2 years)
42.1 fps ∼6% +321%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
19 fps ∼3% +90%
Teclast T40 Plus
10 fps ∼1% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
10 fps ∼1%
Average UNISOC T618 (8.8 - 10, n=5)
9.76 fps ∼1% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
8.4 fps ∼1% -16%
Blackview Tab 10
3.9 fps ∼1% -61%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (117837 - 1186706, n=25, last 2 years)
540119 Points ∼46% +168%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
323166 Points ∼27% +61%
Average UNISOC T618 (201310 - 240502, n=2)
220906 Points ∼19% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
201310 Points ∼17%
Teclast T40 Plus
Points ∼0% -100%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (75328 - 1037960, n=19, last 2 years)
374395 Points ∼36% +116%
Teclast T40 Plus
192320 Points ∼19% +11%
Average UNISOC T618 (173051 - 203961, n=3)
189777 Points ∼18% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
173051 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
167471 Points ∼16% -3%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Tablet (4281 - 119686, n=23, last 2 years)
30230 Points ∼11% +549%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
13045 Points ∼5% +180%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
4691 Points ∼2% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
4659 Points ∼2%
Average UNISOC T618 (4659 - 4726, n=4)
3520 Points ∼1% -24%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (806 - 6908, n=27, last 2 years)
3534 Points ∼42% +92%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
2690 Points ∼32% +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2401 Points ∼28% +31%
Teclast T40 Plus
2107 Points ∼25% +15%
Average UNISOC T618 (1839 - 2145, n=4)
2031 Points ∼24% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1839 Points ∼22%
System
Average of class Tablet (1492 - 10926, n=27, last 2 years)
6283 Points ∼32% +33%
Teclast T40 Plus
5061 Points ∼26% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
4979 Points ∼25% +5%
Average UNISOC T618 (4403 - 5061, n=4)
4764 Points ∼24% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
4729 Points ∼24%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
4193 Points ∼21% -11%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (675 - 8167, n=27, last 2 years)
3918 Points ∼43% +304%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3765 Points ∼42% +288%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
3209 Points ∼35% +231%
Average UNISOC T618 (970 - 1725, n=4)
1427 Points ∼16% +47%
Teclast T40 Plus
1404 Points ∼16% +45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
970 Points ∼11%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (542 - 22308, n=27, last 2 years)
6666 Points ∼23% +233%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
3694 Points ∼13% +85%
Teclast T40 Plus
2075 Points ∼7% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2001 Points ∼7%
Average UNISOC T618 (1834 - 2075, n=4)
1993 Points ∼7% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1857 Points ∼6% -7%
Web
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
1353 Points ∼57% +9%
Teclast T40 Plus
1336 Points ∼56% +7%
Average UNISOC T618 (1246 - 1336, n=4)
1307 Points ∼55% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1246 Points ∼52%
Average of class Tablet (731 - 1581, n=27, last 2 years)
1216 Points ∼51% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1120 Points ∼47% -10%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview Tab 10 Mediatek MT8768, PowerVR GE8320, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 Mediatek Helio G90T, ARM Mali-G76 MP4, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Teclast T40 Plus UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Average UNISOC T618
 
Average of class Tablet
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (15 - 184.3, n=34, last 2 years)
79.1 Points ∼100% +80%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
43.98 Points ∼56%
Average UNISOC T618 (40.7 - 44, n=3)
42 Points ∼53% -5%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
35.99 Points ∼45% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185)
32.44 Points ∼41% -26%
Blackview Tab 10 (Chrome 93.0.4577.62)
17.03 Points ∼22% -61%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (22.1 - 436, n=40, last 2 years)
144 Points ∼100% +117%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
69.8 Points ∼48% +5%
Teclast T40 Plus (Chrome 95)
69.1 Points ∼48% +4%
Average UNISOC T618 (63.2 - 75.3, n=4)
68.5 Points ∼48% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
66.5 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185)
49.52 Points ∼34% -26%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Tablet (24 - 254, n=41, last 2 years)
103 Points ∼100% +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
75 Points ∼73%
Teclast T40 Plus (Chrome 95)
74 Points ∼72% -1%
Average UNISOC T618 (68 - 76, n=5)
72.2 Points ∼70% -4%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
53 Points ∼51% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185)
52 Points ∼50% -31%
Blackview Tab 10 (Chrome 93.0.4577.62)
33 Points ∼32% -56%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (12.6 - 255, n=32, last 2 years)
84.4 runs/min ∼100% +153%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
33.5 runs/min ∼40% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
33.35 runs/min ∼40%
Average UNISOC T618 (32.9 - 33.4, n=3)
33.2 runs/min ∼39% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185)
29.27 runs/min ∼35% -12%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (3111 - 66974, n=39, last 2 years)
25360 Points ∼100% +135%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
15632 Points ∼62% +45%
Teclast T40 Plus (Chrome 95)
13348 Points ∼53% +24%
Average UNISOC T618 (10787 - 14722, n=5)
12582 Points ∼50% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
10787 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185)
9737 Points ∼38% -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Blackview Tab 10 (Chrome 93.0.4577.62)
10760 ms * ∼100% -252%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185)
4498 ms * ∼42% -47%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93)
3782 ms * ∼35% -24%
Average of class Tablet (455 - 12972, n=42, last 2 years)
3617 ms * ∼34% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
3060 ms * ∼28%
Average UNISOC T618 (2762 - 3432, n=5)
2975 ms * ∼28% +3%
Teclast T40 Plus (Chrome 95)
2853 ms * ∼27% +7%

* ... smaller is better

三星没有给出任何关于存储类型的信息，但数据传输率让我们认为它是eMMC闪存。这在Galaxy Tab A8中做得很好，而这个价格级别的大多数其他平板电脑也没有运行得更快。

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022Blackview Tab 10Lenovo Yoga Tab 11Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)Teclast T40 PlusAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-25%
171%
18%
-34%
-28%
153%
Sequential Read 256KB
255.1
263.6
3%
503
97%
298
17%
151.1
-41%
240 ?(25.8 - 452, n=231)
-6%
703 ?(123.3 - 2031, n=38, last 2 years)
176%
Sequential Write 256KB
101.1
135.3
34%
374.4
270%
89.9
-11%
136.8
35%
98.2 ?(14.8 - 188.7, n=231)
-3%
374 ?(87.2 - 1559, n=38, last 2 years)
270%
Random Read 4KB
68.3
31.37
-54%
136.8
100%
82
20%
29.24
-57%
42.3 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=231)
-38%
121.8 ?(10.1 - 310, n=38, last 2 years)
78%
Random Write 4KB
57.5
9.4
-84%
182.2
217%
83.6
45%
16.12
-72%
20.6 ?(0.75 - 89.5, n=231)
-64%
108 ?(4.27 - 370, n=38, last 2 years)
88%

游戏 - 目前的游戏也有30FPS

与Galaxy Tab A8相比，它的性能略高。 Galaxy Tab A7在玩游戏时变得特别明显。图形要求高的游戏通常只有在降低图形细节的情况下才能在前代产品中顺利运行。相比之下，使用Galaxy Tab A8，你还可以在高清预设下玩PUBG Mobile，例如，这在Galaxy Tab A7上是不可能的。帧率也略高。除了在测试PUBG Mobile和Armajet（我们的第二个游戏）时的一些小的异常值外，帧率几乎保持在30 FPS。

我们使用Gamebench的工具测量帧率。工具。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
051015202530Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø30 (26-31)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.8.0: Ø29.9 (24-32)

排放 - 始终保持完整的性能

温度

在操作过程中，Galaxy Tab A8的温度最高为38.5°C（101°F），这几乎不比皮肤温度高。此外，温度热点位于显示屏的左上角，这是一个你在手握平板电脑时几乎不会接触到的区域。

在内部， 统一T618将其温度控制得很好，因为即使在持续的负载下，我们也无法让Galaxy Tab A8开始节流。这意味着，这款平板电脑始终能够发挥其全部性能。

GFXBench T-Rex电池测试
GFXBench T-Rex电池测试
GFXBench曼哈顿电池测试
GFXBench曼哈顿电池测试

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

012345678Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.26 (4.25-4.27)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.09 (8.05-8.11)
Teclast T40 Plus Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.27 (4.26-4.28)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.096 (1.091-1.101)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø2.31 (2.29-2.31)
Teclast T40 Plus Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø1.105 (1.103-1.107)
Max. Load
 38.5 °C38.3 °C31.4 °C 
 34.7 °C30.6 °C29.7 °C 
 33.8 °C30 °C28.8 °C 
Maximum: 38.5 °C
Average: 32.9 °C
31.3 °C34.8 °C35.1 °C
29.7 °C30.9 °C33.1 °C
28.8 °C30.5 °C31.8 °C
Maximum: 35.1 °C
Average: 31.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  36.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.4 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.4 °C / 87 F.

发言人

Galaxy Tab A8的四个扬声器在短边各放置了两个。这意味着，无论你是以横向还是纵向方式拿着平板电脑，声音都会从两边传来。

扬声器四重奏产生了强有力的声音，其特点是中音和高音非常平衡。正如预期的那样，只有低音是罕见的。 对于这个价格级别来说，音质是非常好的。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.228.92521.7203118.622.44021.720.4503233.66325.724.58027.419.610024.318.312516.326.516018.944.820017.547.825012.352.731515.758.940011.660.350011.869.763012.472.180011.671.4100012.577.2125013.176.7160012.576.2200013.172.2250012.870.3315012.868.5400012.976.3500013.379.4630013.480.3800013.774.61000013.768.81250014.463.61600013.751.7SPL25.287.4N0.771.6median 13.1median 69.7Delta1.511.330.42923.332.12624.522.623.234.537.819.923.814.716.514.419.714.931.317.851.918.952.211.759.213.967.21370.510.373.610.474.412.474.911.177.511.277.112.775.412.373.612.673.312.769.512.775.612.773.313.572.41466.313.569.214.964.21655.824.8860.669.1median 12.7median 70.518.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电源管理 -Galaxy Tab A8提供了一个坚实的电池寿命

消耗功率

使用附带的7.8瓦的充电器，需要大约4.5小时才能完全充满三星Galaxy Tab A8的7040毫安时电池。通过使用可选的15瓦充电器，你可以大大缩短充电时间。

Galaxy Tab A8的耗电量并不明显。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.19 / 4.63 / 4.68 Watt
Load midlight 7.27 / 9.17 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7040 mAh		Blackview Tab 10
7480 mAh		Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
7700 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
7040 mAh		Teclast T40 Plus
6600 mAh
Power Consumption
-22%
33%
-2%
46%
Idle Minimum *
1.19
2
-68%
1.2
-1%
1.18
1%
1.11
7%
Idle Average *
4.63
6
-30%
1.5
68%
4.92
-6%
1.13
76%
Idle Maximum *
4.68
6.1
-30%
1.9
59%
4.95
-6%
1.62
65%
Load Average *
7.27
6.8
6%
4.9
33%
7.21
1%
4.01
45%
Load Maximum *
9.17
8.1
12%
8.8
4%
9.32
-2%
5.94
35%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618: Ø5.07 (2.29-8.38)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 Mediatek Helio G90T: Ø4.24 (1.478-8.87)
Teclast T40 Plus UNISOC T618: Ø4.22 (1.118-9.08)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.46 (3.07-5.11)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 Mediatek Helio G90T; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.24 (3.88-4.91)
Teclast T40 Plus UNISOC T618; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.32 (1.229-3.8)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618; Idle 1min: Ø2.42 (2.33-2.92)
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 Mediatek Helio G90T; Idle 1min: Ø1.483 (1.201-2.07)
Teclast T40 Plus UNISOC T618; Idle 1min: Ø1.179 (1.161-1.225)

电池寿命

在电池测试中，Galaxy Tab A8在网上冲浪时约为11.5小时，播放视频近14小时，取得了良好的数值。然而，竞争对手的电池寿命也和三星平板电脑一样好。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
32h 53min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 19min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 44min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 50min
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7040 mAh		Blackview Tab 10
7480 mAh		Lenovo Yoga Tab 11
7700 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
7040 mAh		Teclast T40 Plus
6600 mAh
Battery Runtime
14%
13%
16%
12%
Reader / Idle
1973
1835
-7%
3192
62%
H.264
824
1115
35%
745
-10%
WiFi v1.3
679
774
14%
891
31%
757
11%
758
12%
Load
230
216
-6%
235
2%

Pros

+ 纤细而坚固的金属外壳
+ 4个带Dolby Atmos的扬声器
+ 扎实的性能
+ 儿童模式和Android 11
+ DRM Widevine L1
+ LTE，快速WLAN，蓝牙5.0
+ 运行基本流畅
+ 没有PWM闪烁
+ 可靠的电池寿命

Cons

- 可用存储空间不大
- 弱的800万像素摄像头
- 显示屏对比度差
- 不准确和缓慢的GPS
- 没有指纹传感器
- 使用7.8瓦的充电器充电时间长

对三星Galaxy Tab A8的评价--停滞不前多于进步