Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 650

Qualcomm Adreno 650

Qualcomm Adreno 650是集成在Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SoC中的智能手机和平板电脑GPU。该芯片将于2020年初上市，并将主要用于高端Android设备。

高通公司表示，Adreno 650 GPU的性能比其前身Adreno 640（集成到Snapdragon 855 SoC中）提高了25％。 Adreno 650的计算单元（ALU）比Adreno 640多了50％，从而提高了性能。此外，像素着色器的时钟速度也提高了50％。

我们在参考系统的第一个基准测试中的性能使其自身处于ARM Mali-G76 MP16和更高版本之上。在3DMark Sling Shot Extreme中排名第一。在GFXBench中，只有Apple A13 GPU能够胜过Adreno 650（关于智能手机GPU）。

新奇的是，可以在Android Play商店中更新GPU驱动程序。

Adreno 650支持Vulkan 1.1，DirectX 12，OpenGL ES 3.2和OpenCL 2.0 FP。此外，游戏和视频可以使用HDR10 +和Dolby Vision（需要支持的屏幕）。

Adreno 600 Series

Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600
Core Speed250 - 670 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology7 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement04.12.2019
CPU in Adreno 650GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G8 x 2420 MHz, 5 W? MHz670 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)8 x 2420 MHz, 5 W250 MHz646 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8658 x 2420 MHz, 5 W250 MHz587 MHz
min. - max.250 MHz587 - 670 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 110875     avg: 149779     median: 149017 (15%)     max: 180392 Points
+ 26 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 7970     avg: 9563     median: 9684 (42%)     max: 11492 Points
+ 36 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11617     avg: 13051     median: 12858 (28%)     max: 16809 Points
+ 36 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 6960     avg: 8089     median: 8085 (34%)     max: 8975 Points
+ 38 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 8593     avg: 9728     median: 9498 (24%)     max: 11999 Points
+ 37 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
ARM Mali-T720
91.7 -99%
...
ARM Mali-G77 MP11
7112 -27%
Qualcomm Adreno 643
7131 -27%
Samsung Xclipse 530
7170 -26%
HiSilicon Maleoon 910
7681 -21%
ARM Mali-G610 MP4
8032 -17%
ARM Mali-G77 MP9
8264 -15%
Apple A13 Bionic GPU
8528 -12%
ARM Mali-G78 MP20
9432 -3%
Samsung Xclipse 540
9540 -2%
Qualcomm Adreno 650
9728
ARM Mali-G78 MP14
9796 1%
ARM Mali-G610 MP6
10142 4%
Apple A14 Bionic GPU
10821 11%
ARM Mali-G710 MP7
10953 13%
Qualcomm Adreno 720
11069 14%
Qualcomm Adreno 732
11506 18%
Qualcomm Adreno 660
11533 19%
Apple A15 GPU 4-Core
11581 19%
ARM Mali-G78 MP22
12079 24%
...
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12
36299 273%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 8215     avg: 8929     median: 8867 (79%)     max: 10046 Points
+ 29 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 10599     avg: 11936     median: 11577.5 (69%)     max: 14283 Points
+ 28 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 5996     avg: 7150     median: 7178 (35%)     max: 7881 Points
+ 29 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 6500     avg: 8287     median: 8299 (28%)     max: 9167 Points
+ 27 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3789     avg: 4168     median: 4230 (2%)     max: 5039 Points
+ 25 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1103     avg: 1218     median: 1223 (1%)     max: 1246 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.7     avg: 9.9     median: 10 (4%)     max: 10 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 18     avg: 21.1     median: 21 (4%)     max: 27 fps
+ 47 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
PowerVR GE8100
0.314 -99%
...
Qualcomm Adreno 630
15.59 -26%
Qualcomm Adreno 644
16.43 -22%
ARM Mali-G76 MP12
17.17 -19%
Qualcomm Adreno 640
17.45 -17%
Qualcomm Adreno 642
18 -15%
Qualcomm Adreno 643
18 -15%
Qualcomm Adreno 810
18.5 -12%
Samsung Xclipse 530
19 -10%
ARM Mali-G77 MP9
19.59 -7%
Qualcomm Adreno 650
21.13
Apple A12 Bionic GPU
21.54 2%
ARM Mali-G77 MP11
21.8 3%
ARM Mali-G610 MP4
22.33 6%
Samsung Xclipse 540
23.67 12%
HiSilicon Maleoon 910
24.2 15%
ARM Mali-G610 MP6
24.83 18%
Qualcomm Adreno 720
25.33 20%
ARM Mali-G78 MP14
26.67 26%
Qualcomm Adreno 660
26.81 27%
...
Apple M3 10-Core GPU
118.5 461%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
530 2408%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 27     avg: 55     median: 55 (4%)     max: 67 fps
+ 47 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 39     avg: 52.6     median: 51 (5%)     max: 62 fps
+ 43 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 67     avg: 87.2     median: 88 (2%)     max: 103 fps
+ 43 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 96     avg: 125.1     median: 125 (5%)     max: 151 fps
+ 42 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 168     avg: 209.5     median: 206 (2%)     max: 266 fps
+ 42 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 214123     avg: 240087     median: 240035 (24%)     max: 276746 Points
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 72.6     avg: 75.5     median: 75 (2%)     max: 78.57 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
2688 points (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
2532 points (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
54110 Points (19%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42627 Points (71%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.18     avg: 8.2     median: 7.6 (3%)     max: 12.7 Watt
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910111213Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra Ultra
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
60 119 ~ 90 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
60 117 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
60 118 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
ultra
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
30 30 30 52 59 60 60 60 60 62 64 85 91 114 117 119 120 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
40 40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 90 90 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 30 30 30 39 40 40 40 40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
60 60 62 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
60 60 61 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
60 60 90 105 142 144 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
30 30 60 60 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 58 60 60 60 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
60 144 ~ 102 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal6060
League of Legends: Wild Rift908989
Call of Duty Mobile60
Genshin Impact6060
Armajet71
PUBG Mobile61585340
Arena of Valor6160
Dead Trigger 2100
Asphalt 9: Legends4541
Real Racing 3102
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
5

1


2
4

1
5






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 13. 20:12:40

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Jul 2025 05:36:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.031s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#24 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.031s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 9971 +0.015s ... 0.046s

#26 got single benchmarks 9971 +0.09s ... 0.135s

#27 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.135s

#28 min, max, avg, median took s +0.478s ... 0.613s

#29 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.613s

#30 Got 130 rows for game benchmarks. +0.027s ... 0.64s

#31 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.64s

#32 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.645s

#33 benchmarks composed for output. +0.093s ... 0.738s

#34 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 0.74s

#35 return log +0s ... 0.74s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm Adreno 650 graphics card

小米 Pad 6 平板电脑评测

小米 Pad 6 评测：大幅改进的平板电脑，支持手写笔，价格同样实惠

在我们的评测中，与小米 Pad 5 相比，小米 Pad 6 中端平板电脑在许多方面都有所改进。这款 11 英寸平板电脑价格亲民，配备 144Hz 显示屏、骁龙 SoC、高品质外壳，并支持手写笔。 ...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | 11.00" | 490 g
华为MatePad Pro 11

华为MatePad Pro 11 2022平板电脑评测--一个更实惠的iPad Pro？

MatePad Pro 11是一款经济实惠的高端平板电脑，支持手写笔和AMOLED显示屏。有几个缺点，因为它是华为的设备。它没有谷歌服务，也不支持5G。低价是否弥补了这些妥协？...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | 11.00" | 449 g
小米Poco F4评测。伟大的智能手机，但缺乏创新

小米Poco F4评测。伟大的智能手机，但缺乏创新

Poco智能手机代表着良好的性价比。但新的Poco F4与它的前身F3非常相似--甚至处理器也是一样的。此外，制造商的旗舰产品F4 GT已于今年早些时候发布。我们的评论澄清了F4的排名。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | 6.67" | 195 g
黑鲨5

小米黑鲨5智能手机评测--以实惠的价格享受游戏乐趣

作为一个便宜的游戏机型，小米黑鲨5配备了一个快速但不是顶级的处理器。然而，专业机型的144赫兹屏幕依然存在。黑鲨5太慢了，还是对游戏玩家来说仍然是个便宜货？...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | 6.67" | 220 g
realme GT Neo 3T

realme GT Neo 3T智能手机评论。拥有明亮的AMOLED的多彩手机

realme GT Neo 3T以其华丽的色彩和 "龙珠Z "特别版的外壳吸引了人们的注意。这一切都只是炒作，还是这款中端智能手机也在我们的审查中证明了自己？...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | 6.62" | 194.5 g

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 12.60", 0.6 kg
  Review » 联想Tab P12 Pro评论。5G平板电脑的替代品，配备大型120赫兹显示屏

Xiaomi 12X: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.28", 0.2 kg
  Review » 小米12X智能手机评测--小米最实惠的12系列高级智能手机

Realme GT Neo 2: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
  Review » realme GT NEO 2 智能手机评测--挑战顶级水平

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  Review » 小米Pad 5 Pro平板电脑评测。快速的iPad竞争者，120赫兹

Motorola Edge 20 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Edge 20 Pro评论。拥有144赫兹显示屏和12GB内存的经济型旗舰智能手机

ZTE Axon 30 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.92", 0.2 kg
  Review » 中兴通讯Axon 30 5G智能手机回顾。显示屏下的摄像头有了明显的改善

Lenovo Yoga Tab 13: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 13.00", 0.8 kg
  Review » 联想Yoga Tab 13平板电脑评测--拥有强大音效的多媒体平板电脑

Huawei MatePad 11 2021: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 10.95", 0.5 kg
  Review » 华为MatePad 11评测--伟大的平板电脑，几乎没有弱点

Vivo X60 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  Review » vivo X60 Pro评测--带有虚拟内存和万向节相机的高级智能手机

Xiaomi Black Shark 4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » 小米黑鲨4智能手机评测--144赫兹显示屏的移动游戏

Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » 小米10 Pro智能手机评测：小米也加入了旗舰机队列

Lenovo Xiaoxin Pad Pro 12.7: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 12.70", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Xiaoxin Pad Pro 12.7

Vivo Pad Air: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 11.50", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Vivo Pad Air

Xiaomi Pad 6: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Pad 6

Huawei MatePad 11 2023: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MatePad 11 2023

Vivo S16: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo S16

ZTE Axon 30s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.92", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Axon 30s

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 11.00", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Huawei Matepad Pro 11 2022

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 12.40", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4

Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Neo6 SE

Vivo T2: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo T2

ZTE Axon 40 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Axon 40 Pro

Vivo S15: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo S15

Xiaomi Poco F4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco F4

Realme GT Neo 3T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme GT Neo 3T

Realme Q5 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Q5 Pro

Xiaomi Black Shark 5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Black Shark 5

Vivo iQOO Neo6: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Neo6

Nubia RedMagic 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.65", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nubia RedMagic 5G

Xiaomi Redmi K40S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K40S

Vivo Pad: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Vivo Pad

  External Review » Oppo Pad

Xiaomi 12X: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.28", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 12X

Vivo iQOO Neo5 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Neo5 SE

Xiaomi Black Shark 4S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Black Shark 4S

Meizu 18X: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Meizu 18X

Realme GT Neo 2: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme GT Neo 2

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 12.60", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Tab P12 Pro

Oppo Reno6 Pro+: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno6 Pro+

Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro

Realme GT Explorer Master Edition: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme GT Explorer Master Edition

Lenovo Yoga Tab 13: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 13.00", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Tab 13

Motorola Edge 20 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge 20 Pro

ZTE Axon 30 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.92", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Axon 30 5G

Huawei MatePad 11 2021: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 10.95", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MatePad 11 2021

Oppo Find X3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Find X3

Vivo X60: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X60

Vivo iQOO Neo5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.62", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Neo5

Xiaomi Mi 11X: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 11X

OnePlus 9R: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus 9R

Motorola Moto G100: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G100

Xiaomi Black Shark 4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Black Shark 4

Meizu Flyme 9: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Meizu Flyme 9

Xiaomi Redmi K40: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K40

Xiaomi Mi 10S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 10S

Xiaomi Poco F3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco F3

Oppo Find X3 Neo: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Find X3 Neo

Motorola Edge S: unknown, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge S

Sony Xperia Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Xperia Pro

Vivo X60 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X60 Pro

Oppo Reno5 Pro+: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno5 Pro+

Xiaomi Redmi K30S Extreme: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K30S Extreme

Samsung W21 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 7.60", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Samsung W21 5G

Xiaomi Redmi K30S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K30S

Xiaomi Black Shark 3S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Black Shark 3S

Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G

Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G

OnePlus 8T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus 8T

Sony Xperia 5 II: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Xperia 5 II

Asus Zenfone 7 ZS670KS: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenfone 7 ZS670KS

Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS

Vivo iQOO 5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO 5

Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra

Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.59", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition

Vivo X50 Pro+: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X50 Pro+

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 7.60", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 12.40", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S7

Lenovo Legion Phone Duel: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 6.65", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Phone Duel

Asus ROG Phone 3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), 6.59", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Phone 3

Xiaomi Black Shark 3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Black Shark 3

Realme X50 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme X50 Pro

Meizu 17 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Meizu 17 Pro

Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro

Oppo Reno Ace 2: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno Ace 2

Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro

Vivo Apex 2020: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.45", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Apex 2020

Sony Xperia 1 II: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Xperia 1 II

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 7.10", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi BlackShark 3 Pro

ZTE Nubia Red Magic 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.65", 0.2 kg
  External Review » ZTE Nubia Red Magic 5G

Motorola Edge Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge+

Vivo Nex 3S 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.89", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Nex 3S 5G

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 7.10", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Black Shark 3

OnePlus 8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus 8

OnePlus 8 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus 8 Pro

Vivo iQOO 3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO 3

LG V60 ThinQ 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » LG V60 ThinQ 5G

Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro

Oppo Find X2 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Find X2 Pro

Xiaomi Mi 10: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 10

Oppo Realme X50 Pro 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Realme X50 Pro 5G

Xiaomi Poco F4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Poco F5 Pro开箱视频和Poco F5现场图片在5月9日发布前浮出水面

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 12.40", 0.6 kg
   » 小米Pad 6和Pad 6 Pro平板电脑首次亮相，价格诱人，硬件稳固

Xiaomi Poco F4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » 据称Poco F5 Pro规格泄露 骁龙8+1代和6400万像素摄像头在手

Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 12.40", 0.6 kg
   » 小米Pad 6系列新信息泄露，新的红米平板电脑似乎即将问世

   » 小米Pad 6：新的泄漏显示了小米下一代平板电脑的SoC选项和发布日期信息

Xiaomi Poco F4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » F4或X4 GT：Poco中档智能手机的比较

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

A18 Pro GPU *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
A18 GPU *
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
Immortalis-G925 MC16 *
Immortalis-G925 MC12 *
Adreno 750 *
Xclipse 950 *
Xclipse 940 *
Adreno 740 *
Immortalis-G720 MP12 *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
Immortalis-G720 MP7 *
Adreno 735 *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
A16 GPU 4-Core *
Adreno 732 *
Adreno 730 *
Mali-G715 MP7 *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
Adreno 725 *
Adreno 720 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Maleoon 920 *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU

Class 4

A10 Fusion GPU
Mali-G77 MP11 *
Xclipse 540
Xclipse 530
Mali-G77 MP9 *
Mali-G76 MP16 *
Mali-G610 MP6 *
Mali-G610 MP4 *
Adreno 810 *
Adreno 644 *
Adreno 643 *
Adreno 642 *
Mali-G610 MP3 *
Mali-G615 MP2 *
Adreno 642L *
Adreno 710 *
Adreno 640 *
Maleoon 910 *
Mali-G76 MP12 *
Mali-G76 MP10 *
Mali-G68 MP5 *
Mali-G57 MP6 *
Mali-G57 MP5 *
Adreno 540 *
Mali-G72 MP18 *
Mali-G71 MP20 *
Mali-G72 MP12 *
Mali-G71 MP8
PowerVR GM9446
Adreno 530
PowerVR GXA6850
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600
Mali-T880 MP12
Mali-G76 MP4 *
Mali-T760 MP8
Mali-G71 MP2 *
Adreno 430
Mali-G72 MP3 *
VideoCore VII *
Mali-G68 MP4 *
Mali-T880 MP4
Mali-G52 MP6 *
Mali-G68 MP2 *
Mali-G52 MP2 *
Mali-G52 MP1 *
Mali-T760 MP6
Mali-T880 MP2
PowerVR GX6450
Adreno 420
Adreno 620 *
IMG BXM-8-256
Mali-G57 MP4 *
Mali-G57 MP3 *

Class 5

Adreno 418
Adreno 619 *
Adreno 619L *
Adreno 618 *
Mali-G57 MP2 *
Mali-G57 MP1 *
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1
Adreno 616 *
Mali-G51 MP4 *
Adreno 613 *
Adreno 612 *
Adreno 610 *
Adreno 512 *
Adreno 510 *
Adreno 330
PowerVR G6430
PowerVR GX6250
PowerVR G6400
Mali-T628 MP6
Mali-T760 MP4
SGX554MP4
Mali-T628 MP4
Adreno 509 *
Adreno 508 *
Adreno 506 *
GE8322 / IMG8322 *
Adreno 505 *
Adreno 504 *
Mali-T860 MP2
Mali-T830 MP3
Mali-T604 MP4
PowerVR G6200
Adreno 405 *
Mali-T830 MP2

Class 6

SGX543MP4 *
Mali-T624
Adreno 320 *
Mali-T760 MP2
PowerVR GE8320 *
PowerVR GE8300 *
PowerVR GE8100 *
Mali-T720 MP4
Mali-450 MP4
Mali-T830 MP1
SGX543MP3 *
SGX543MP2 *
SGX545
SGX544MP2 *
Mali-T720 MP2
SGX544 *
Adreno 308
Adreno 306
Adreno 305
Adreno 304
Mali-T720
GC7000UL
Adreno 302
Adreno 225 *
GC4000 *
Mali-400 MP4 *
VideoCore-IV *
Adreno 220 *
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Mali-400 MP2 *
Mali-400 MP *
SGX540 *
Adreno 205 *
Adreno 203 *
GC800 *
GC Nano Ultra *
SGX535
SGX531
SGX530
Adreno 200 *
Mali-200 *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter