Notebookcheck Logo

联想 Tab M11 平板电脑评测:11 英寸平板电脑,支持手写笔,适合学校和多媒体使用

笔不离手。

您不必花费巨资购买适合娱乐和学习用途的平板电脑。例如,联想 Tab M11 就是一个不错的选择。在测试中,我们将看看除了大屏幕、金属外壳和四个扬声器之外,它还能提供什么。
ARM Android Tablet
Lenovo Tab M11 (Tab M Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G88 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
11.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 206 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (up to 1TB) , Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity, acceleration, position, hall
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.2 x 255.3 x 166.3
Battery
7040 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 15 Watt charging
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: quad speakers, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP52 certified, fanless
Weight
465 g
Price
199 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Bewertung
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
83.4 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Lenovo Tab M11
Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2
465 g128 GB eMMC Flash11.00"1920x1200
84.2 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
480 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash11.00"1920x1200
80 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Teclast T40 Air
T7255, Mali-G57 MP1
464 g256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash10.36"2000x1200
81.2 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Huawei MatePad SE
SD 680, Adreno 610
440 g64 GB eMMC Flash10.40"2000x1200

外壳和功能 - 金属外壳和大量内存

过去,金属外壳的平板电脑只有在较高的价格区间才会出现,但如今在 200 欧元区间也很常见。我们的联想 Tab M11 测试设备采用灰色金属外壳,背面顶部嵌入了一条相当宽的塑料条,以提高接收效果。摄像头模块也位于此处,凸出且略微发亮。机身边框也是金属材质。

联想 Tab M11 的稳定性非常高,尽管体积很大,但几乎无法扭曲,只有强大的压力才能通过屏幕的液晶。制造商还提供了 IP52 认证,这意味着平板电脑可以防尘防水溅,但不能浸入液体中。

正面的显示屏边缘相当窄,但触摸屏仍然易于握持,不会意外触发。

该机型配备了 128 GB 的大容量存储空间,这个配置还算不错,在未来几个月可能会成为这个价位的标准配置。您只能使用 4GB 内存,而 Teclast T40 Air的内存则更大,灵活性更高。

USB-C 端口仅支持 USB 2.0 标准,因此很难加快数据传输,也不提供图像输出功能。如果你想连接耳机或外置扬声器,可以通过 3.5 毫米插孔实现。虽然没有 NFC 功能,但我们的测试机型上有一个 nano-SIM 卡插槽。不能使用 eSIM 卡。此外,还有仅支持 WiFi 的版本。

在我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考存储卡进行的测试中,microSD 读卡器的表现相当不错,在复制测试中平均达到了 34.4 MBit/s。

尺寸比较

257.1 mm 168.7 mm 6.9 mm 480 g255.3 mm 166.3 mm 7.2 mm 465 g247 mm 156.7 mm 7.9 mm 440 g246 mm 156 mm 7.7 mm 464 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
47.18 MB/s +37%
Lenovo Tab M11
  (Angelbird V60)
34.4 MB/s
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=59, last 2 years)
34.4 MB/s 0%
Teclast T40 Air
  (Angelbird V60)
28.4 MB/s -17%
Huawei MatePad SE
  (Angelbird V60)
19.7 MB/s -43%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø27.6 (12.4-42.3)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.8 (29.7-46.3)
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø41.4 (28.2-50.2)
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø36.1 (13.9-54.3)
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.5 (17.4-83.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78 (60.4-86.2)
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.3 (33.2-86.5)
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø52.3 (17.2-85.2)

通信、软件和操作 - 笔支持和更新承诺

得益于 WiFi 5,在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 路由器进行的无线局域网测试中,这款平板电脑的数据传输速率约为 300 - 350 MBit/s。在我们的测试中,传输速率非常稳定,与同等价格的平板电脑相当。该设备并不突出,千兆网络连接也没有得到充分利用。不过,仍然可以实现快速传输。

我们的 4G 机型还可以通过蜂窝网络访问移动互联网。内置调制解调器提供的频率足以在中欧地区运行,但在旅行时,您应该提前检查 Tab M11 是否也能连接到当地的 LTE 网络。

Android 13 仍预装在设备上。 联想将在 2028 年初之前提供安全补丁。无论如何,平板电脑的更新承诺还是相当罕见的,因此对于一款相对廉价的设备来说,这就更加令人高兴了。Android

制造商几乎不会更改谷歌的操作系统,只会预装很少的应用程序。在测试时,安全补丁是从 2024 年 1 月开始的,可以再做一次更新。

DRM L1 是可用的,这样你就可以全高清观看主要供应商提供的流媒体。

触摸屏反应灵敏,在边缘和角落也运行良好。平板电脑支持联想手写笔,可用来手写笔记或绘图。联想的软件支持 OneVision,可通过分屏或浮动窗口实现更好的多任务处理。你还可以启动 PC 模式,通过任务栏对鼠标和键盘控制进行优化。

只有面部识别可以用作生物识别解锁方法。它的工作原理相当可靠,即使在黑暗的地方,屏幕发出的光线通常也足以识别我们。

Networking
Lenovo Tab M11
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
360 (min: 353) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
304 (min: 283) MBit/s ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 356) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
340 (min: 172) MBit/s ∼100%
Teclast T40 Air
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
358 (min: 337) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
308 (min: 238) MBit/s ∼91%
Huawei MatePad SE
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
365 (min: 352) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
310 (min: 284) MBit/s ∼91%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M11; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø304 (283-325)
Lenovo Tab M11; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø360 (353-368)

相机 - 可用图像质量

前置摄像头拍摄的照片
前置摄像头拍摄的照片

廉价平板电脑的摄像头一直是个问题,联想的网站也在宣传文件扫描,而不是美丽的度假照片。

背面只有一个 800 万像素的摄像头,但它拍摄的快照还算可以接受。如果事后不将其放大太多,并期望获得大量细节,在白天也能拍出照片。

在弱光环境下,清晰度还有待提高,但亮度尚可。视频可以 1080p 格式录制,最高 30 fps。自动对焦经常可以看到,但有些延迟,曝光调整通常较快。

前置还有一个 800 万像素的自拍摄像头,自拍效果非常不错。细节清晰度和暗部亮度并不突出,但如果你没有太高的期望,你绝对可以使用前置摄像头。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
ColorChecker
5.4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Tab M11: 6.87 ∆E min: 2.68 - max: 10.27 ∆E
ColorChecker
29 ∆E
54.5 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
65.8 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
77.9 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
24 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Tab M11: 47.01 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 93.74 ∆E

显示屏 - 90 Hz 面板,色彩强烈但不准确

子像素结构
子像素结构

IPS 屏幕的分辨率为 1,920 x 1,200 像素,比标准的全高清分辨率略高。屏幕亮度可达 441 cd/m²,平均约为 405 cd/m²。这个亮度只够在暮色下的室外使用,但在室内使用已经足够。

屏幕显示的色彩很强烈,但根据我们使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测试,色彩都过于鲜艳明亮。虽然这看起来不错,但如果有人希望达到不错的色彩准确度,例如打印输出,那么稍后的结果就会完全不同,这让他很失望。

即使在低亮度下,我们也没有发现 PWM 闪烁。

389
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 441 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 404.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 431 cd/m²
Contrast: 1078:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.72 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.194
Lenovo Tab M11
IPS, 1920x1200, 11"
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"
Teclast T40 Air
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"
Huawei MatePad SE
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"
Response Times
18%
10%
27%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
70.1 ?(27.9, 41.2)
53.81 ?(24.04, 29.77)
23%
58.4 ?(32.4, 26)
17%
44.5 ?(23.4, 21.1)
37%
Response Time Black / White *
33.9 ?(11.3, 12.6)
29.92 ?(13.96, 15.96)
12%
33.1 ?(14.5, 18.6)
2%
28.6 ?(14.4, 14.2)
16%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-2%
-49%
13%
Brightness middle
431
493
14%
319
-26%
398
-8%
Brightness
405
460
14%
296
-27%
368
-9%
Brightness Distribution
88
90
2%
85
-3%
87
-1%
Black Level *
0.4
0.35
12%
0.44
-10%
0.46
-15%
Contrast
1078
1409
31%
725
-33%
865
-20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
9.72
6
38%
10.9
-12%
2.17
78%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.59
11.7
-1%
19.02
-64%
4.32
63%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.6
8.2
-128%
11.5
-219%
3.1
14%
Gamma
2.194 100%
2.21 100%
2.035 108%
2.214 99%
CCT
7348 88%
9131 71%
11482 57%
7245 90%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
8% / 2%
-20% / -38%
20% / 16%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.3 ms rise
↘ 12.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
70.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27.9 ms rise
↘ 41.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 同时使用四个扬声器

联发科 联发科 Helio G88作为 SoC。它拥有两个主频高达 2 GHz 的 ARM Cortex-A75 性能内核和六个主频高达 1.8 GHz 的 ARM Cortex-A55 节能内核,在性能方面达到了同类产品的水平。三星 三星Galaxy Tab A9+显示了更多的可能性。

联想 Tab M11 偶尔需要一些时间来处理菜单中的动画,系统很少有真正流畅的感觉。在加载大型应用程序时,你必须做好等待时间的准备,特别是因为内存的运行速度相当慢。

我们在 Tab M11 的正面测得的最高温度为 35.5 °C。虽然温度略高,但并不影响使用。由于我们是在室温下进行测试,因此这也为更温暖的环境留出了空间。即使在长时间负载的情况下,SoC 也不会降低其性能。

平板电脑配有四个扬声器,因此在我们的音量测量中达到了 81.4 dB(A)。中低音也能听到,但平板电脑听起来并不饱满有力。不过,你可以通过 3.5 毫米音频插孔和蓝牙连接外部扬声器或耳机,以获得更好的音效。可用的无线音频编解码器很少:SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD 和 LDAC 涵盖了最广泛使用的替代技术。

根据我们的无线局域网测试,在平板电脑耗尽电量之前,我们可以不间断地上网近 15 个小时。对于一块 7,040 毫安时的电池来说,这已经是相当不错的续航时间了、 Teclast T40 Air三星Galaxy Tab A9+还能多用几分钟。最大充电功率为 15 瓦,平板电脑不附带充电器。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=70, last 2 years)
1111 Points +155%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
919 Points +111%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
436 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (432 - 442, n=5)
436 Points 0%
Teclast T40 Air
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
427 Points -2%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=70, last 2 years)
3544 Points +157%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1993 Points +45%
Teclast T40 Air
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
1474 Points +7%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1379 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1217 - 1436, n=5)
1311 Points -5%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (140 - 1887, n=70, last 2 years)
712 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
693 Points +90%
Huawei MatePad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
377 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
364 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (284 - 378, n=6)
357 Points -2%
Teclast T40 Air
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
350 Points -4%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (312 - 8624, n=70, last 2 years)
2508 Points +70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1768 Points +20%
Huawei MatePad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1630 Points +11%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1475 Points
Teclast T40 Air
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
1387 Points -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1132 - 1475, n=6)
1316 Points -11%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
10550 Points +8%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9847 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9802 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (6789 - 9802, n=6)
8764 Points -11%
Teclast T40 Air
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
7936 Points -19%
Huawei MatePad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5432 Points -45%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet
  (267 - 17674, n=66, last 2 years)
4499 Points +225%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3075 Points +122%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1334 - 1453, n=6)
1397 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1385 Points
Huawei MatePad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1330 Points -4%
Teclast T40 Air
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
1089 Points -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet
  (240 - 29325, n=66, last 2 years)
5876 Points +388%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2991 Points +149%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1177 - 1277, n=6)
1230 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1203 Points
Huawei MatePad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1156 Points -4%
Teclast T40 Air
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
927 Points -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet
  (441 - 7451, n=66, last 2 years)
3632 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3409 Points +16%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2935 Points
Huawei MatePad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2809 Points -4%
Teclast T40 Air
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
2798 Points -5%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (2427 - 2935, n=6)
2667 Points -9%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Tablet
  (286 - 7933, n=60, last 2 years)
1748 Points +149%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1216 Points +73%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (697 - 759, n=6)
725 Points +3%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
702 Points
Teclast T40 Air
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
474 Points -32%
Huawei MatePad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
441 Points -37%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet
  (289 - 32525, n=73, last 2 years)
4720 Points +574%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1206 Points +72%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (622 - 755, n=6)
716 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
700 Points
Teclast T40 Air
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
474 Points -32%
Huawei MatePad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
440 Points -37%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Tablet
  (75 - 8689, n=74, last 2 years)
1334 Points +645%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
361 Points +102%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (179 - 191, n=6)
186.5 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
179 Points
Teclast T40 Air
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
129 Points -28%
Huawei MatePad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
121 Points -32%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Tablet
  (72 - 8889, n=73, last 2 years)
1564 Points +779%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
354 Points +99%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (156 - 189, n=6)
179.8 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
178 Points
Teclast T40 Air
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
126 Points -29%
Huawei MatePad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
120 Points -33%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (3 - 120, n=79, last 2 years)
27.4 fps +230%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
21 fps +153%
Huawei MatePad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
8.6 fps +4%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.3 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (7.5 - 9, n=6)
8.25 fps -1%
Teclast T40 Air
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
5.8 fps -30%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (2.5 - 340, n=79, last 2 years)
55.9 fps +528%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
22 fps +147%
Huawei MatePad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
9.3 fps +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (8.2 - 9.7, n=6)
9.22 fps +4%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.9 fps
Teclast T40 Air
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
6.1 fps -31%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (1.9 - 106.4, n=79, last 2 years)
19 fps +280%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
13 fps +160%
Huawei MatePad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5.2 fps +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (4.7 - 5.9, n=6)
5.12 fps +2%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5 fps
Teclast T40 Air
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
3.7 fps -26%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.9 - 114.5, n=79, last 2 years)
21.3 fps +545%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
8.2 fps +148%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (3.2 - 3.5, n=6)
3.4 fps +3%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.3 fps
Huawei MatePad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3.2 fps -3%
Teclast T40 Air
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
2.2 fps -33%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.4 - 55.1, n=77, last 2 years)
10 fps +614%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3.6 fps +157%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1.4 - 1.6, n=5)
1.5 fps +7%
Huawei MatePad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1.4 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.4 fps
Teclast T40 Air
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
0.95 fps -32%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet
  (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)
29371 Points +119%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
29301 Points +118%
Teclast T40 Air
Unisoc T7255, Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
14522 Points +8%
Lenovo Tab M11
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13413 Points
Huawei MatePad SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
10370 Points -23%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (7611 - 13413, n=6)
9991 Points -26%
Lenovo Tab M11Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+Teclast T40 AirHuawei MatePad SEAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
62%
-16%
-36%
-22%
152%
Sequential Read 256KB
294.5
485.96
65%
270.7
-8%
293.6
0%
Sequential Write 256KB
256.9
476.37
85%
246.2
-4%
99.5
-61%
194.6 ?(72.3 - 314, n=77)
-24%
Random Read 4KB
95.6
130.67
37%
76.3
-20%
61.8
-35%
82.7 ?(8.63 - 247, n=77)
-13%
Random Write 4KB
101.2
162.9
61%
67.8
-33%
54
-47%

温度

Max. Load
 35.5 °C33.9 °C28.7 °C 
 33.4 °C31 °C28.4 °C 
 32.3 °C31.2 °C28.3 °C 
Maximum: 35.5 °C
Average: 31.4 °C
28.9 °C33.8 °C34.7 °C
29.4 °C31.6 °C33 °C
29.1 °C30.3 °C31.4 °C
Maximum: 34.7 °C
Average: 31.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.3 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.


正面热图
正面热图
热图返回
热图返回

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

01234567Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.088 (1.072-1.097)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.14-2.16)
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.775 (0.732-0.818)
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.725 (0.703-0.747)
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.22 (4.19-4.23)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.23-7.27)
Teclast T40 Air Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.85 (2.84-2.86)
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.64 (2.64-2.64)

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.2402533.233.53127.130.84030.532.1503432.56325.824.3801725.210019.932.312525.437.616017.341.620010.641.525014.448.93158.152.34007.453.45007.860.8630964.780012.565.3100017.267.112509.46916001066.420009.863.8250010.365.231501164.240001270.5500012.671.6630013.576.3800014.472.81000015.266.21250015.9561600016.845.7SPL24.881.4N0.649.2median 12.5median 64.2Delta3.29.833.135.132.640.627.434.330.536.434.140.429.432.719.921.22221.822.925.114.235.61138.511.742.48.5478.953.29.458.610.162.916.561.91468.615.467.310.563.210.765.911.36511.964.512.96113.564.714.260.8155015.745.916.450.217.351.525.5760.734.9median 13.5median 58.62.710.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Tab M11Huawei MatePad SE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Tab M11 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MatePad SE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7040 mAh
920 min +3%
Teclast T40 Air
7200 mAh
918 min +2%
Lenovo Tab M11
7040 mAh
896 min
Average of class Tablet
  (319 - 1764, n=79, last 2 years)
822 min -8%
Huawei MatePad SE
5100 mAh
638 min -29%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
14h 56min

Pros

+ 美观、坚固的金属机身
+ 电池寿命长
+ 内存充足
+ DRM L1
+ 软件更新至 2028 年
+ 支持笔
+ 无 PWM

Cons

- 性能中等
- 相机图像不清晰
- 屏幕暗...
- ...色彩还原不准确

结论 - 相当普通......还是不普通?

回顾:联想 Tab M11。测试设备由提供:
回顾:联想 Tab M11。测试设备由提供:
cyberport.de

联想 Tab M11 是一款毫不张扬、经济实惠的平板电脑,在日常使用中表现出色。一方面,这归功于它美观坚固的金属外壳、屏幕边缘纤薄的现代设计、实用的摄像头和良好的电池续航能力。

作为一项特殊功能,即使Android 13 目前仍安装在平板电脑上,您也能在 2028 年之前获得软件更新。我们曾期待四个扬声器能发出更强劲的声音,而且屏幕更适合在室内使用,而不适合在户外明亮的夏日使用。

联想的 Tab M11 有 WiFi 和 LTE 两种版本,就其 200 欧元左右的价格区间而言,传输速率不错。支持手写笔以及多任务和 PC 模式的额外软件选项是一个很好的补充,也让这款平板电脑看起来可以替代笔记本电脑完成简单的任务。

乍一看,联想 Tab M11 并没有什么特别之处,但其支持手写笔、PC 模式和良好的内存使其在竞争中脱颖而出。

内存更大的替代品是 Teclast T40 Air.性能更强的有 三星Galaxy Tab A9+.

价格和供应情况

联想 Tab M11 可直接从制造商处购买,各种配件包的起价为 135 美元。否则,感兴趣的用户可以通过亚马逊订购该设备。

Lenovo Tab M11 - 05/10/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
85 / 98 → 87%
Keyboard
68 / 80 → 85%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
46 / 70 → 65%
Weight
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Battery
91%
Display
82%
Games Performance
17 / 78 → 21%
Application Performance
60 / 92 → 65%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 83%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Average
73%
83%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想 Tab M11 平板电脑评测:11 英寸平板电脑,支持手写笔,适合学校和多媒体使用
Florian Schmitt, 2024-05-14 (Update: 2024-05-14)