Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarTecno Spark 10 Pro 智能手机评测--150 美元手机中的高分辨率自拍相机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76.1 % | 09/2023 | Tecno Spark 10 Pro Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2 | 206 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.80" | 2460x1080 | |
| 78.7 % | 09/2023 | Tecno Spark 10 5G Dimensity 6020, Mali-G57 MP2 | 194 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 1612x720 | |
| 79 % | 08/2023 | Xiaomi Redmi 12 Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2 | 198.5 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.79" | 2460x1080 | |
| 75.9 % | 07/2023 | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 201 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
| 78.7 % | 05/2023 | Nokia G22 T606, Mali-G57 MP1 | 195 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.52" | 1600x720 |
手机壳和功能 - 智能手机空间充足
在国际上，Tecno Spark 10 Pro 还有令人兴奋甚至不同寻常的变体。除了经典的白色和黑色（在欧洲也有销售）外，还有一款黑白双色机型，机背采用合成皮革。不过，最特别的颜色选择是魔幻品红色。它之所以脱颖而出，不仅因为其部分粉红色的背面和边框，还因为它在黑暗中会发出荧光，散发出绿色的光芒。
Tecno Spark 10 Pro 提供 256 GB 的超大存储容量，但与之不同的是，这些令人兴奋的颜色选项目前在欧洲和美国都没有销售。因此，我们的测试机是拥有 128 GB 存储空间和 8 GB 内存的黑色机型。这款手机做工精良，但容易弯曲和凹陷。不过，考虑到其相对较低的价位，耐用性还是可以接受的。
Tecno 手机具有 NFC 功能。此外，它还配备了专用的 microSD 读卡器，在我们的测试中，该读卡器的传输速率相对较高，给人留下了深刻印象。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Tecno Spark 10 Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (10.9 - 77, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Tecno Spark 10 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
| Nokia G22 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 波动的数据传输速率
WiFi 5 是该手机能够支持的最快无线局域网标准。遗憾的是，在我们使用参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture AXE 11000 进行测试的整个过程中，传输速度经常出现中断，这种情况可能会重现。总体而言，该手机的传输速度在同价位手机中处于较低水平；而同类手机的传输速度则要流畅得多。
Tecno Spark 10 Pro 是一款 4G 手机，具有特定的 LTE 频率，可以在国外使用。在城市环境中进行测试的整个期间，我们从未遇到过信号中断的情况，但值得注意的是，它的信号质量还无法与高端智能手机相媲美。
Android 13 作为主操作系统，该公司在此基础上添加了自己的 HiOS。这种定制明显改变了界面，并引入了额外的功能，如用于信息服务的语音扭曲器和用于保护屏幕隐私的遮光功能。
这款手机预装了大量第三方软件，如果你喜欢更干净的系统，可能需要对这些软件进行清理。在我们的测试过程中，该设备的安全补丁截至 2023 年 8 月，这是相当新的。目前，它每隔几个月就会收到一次更新；不过，供应商并未提供有关支持期限的信息。
90 Hz 的屏幕确保了快速的输入响应，并为整体流畅的系统性能做出了贡献。即使在边角位置，触摸屏的反应也很灵敏。指纹传感器位于右侧，与待机键集成在一起，允许从待机模式直接解锁，但会有轻微延迟。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Nokia G22 | |
| Tecno Spark 10 5G | |
| Tecno Spark 10 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12 | |
| Nokia G22 | |
| Tecno Spark 10 5G | |
| Tecno Spark 10 Pro | |
摄像头 - 单后置摄像头
手机后部配备了一个 5000 万像素的单摄像头，仅支持在肖像中创建模糊效果。主摄像头的快照乍看之下还不错，但如果亮度再高一些就更好了。令人惊讶的是，天空的表现显得有些浑浊，整体画面的细节也没有预期的那么准确。
手机在捕捉弱光场景时具有良好的情绪表现，但在非常暗的区域往往会失去动态范围。
视频录制最高支持 1440p 分辨率，每秒 30 格。自动对焦一般表现可靠，亮度调节也很有效。
3200 万像素的前置摄像头通常可拍摄 800 万像素的照片，像素更大，感光度更高。有一个特殊的设置，可以捕捉全部 3200 万像素分辨率的图像。使用该摄像头拍摄的自拍照可略有增强，而暗处的细节仍然清晰可见。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light
显示屏 - 全高清屏幕，亮度足够
虽然全高清屏幕还不是这个价位的所有设备的标准配置，但 Tecno Spark 10 Pro 配备了全高清屏幕。
屏幕的最大亮度平均为 459 cd/m²，处于较高水平。只有 诺基亚 G22在这方面超过了它。在光线极强的日子里，在户外使用 Tecno 智能手机可能会有些困难，但对于大多数日常场景来说，屏幕亮度还是绰绰有余的。
黑屏亮度较低，能营造出深邃的暗区，增强色彩对比度。不过，在我们使用分光光度计进行的测试中，色彩还原被证明相当一般。有明显的偏蓝现象，几乎所有的颜色都明显偏离最佳值。
我们没有检测到任何 PWM，因此即使是敏感的消费者也可以放心使用这款手机。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 459 cd/m²
Contrast: 1530:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.19 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 8.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
| Tecno Spark 10 Pro IPS, 2460x1080, 6.80 | Tecno Spark 10 5G IPS, 1612x720, 6.60 | Xiaomi Redmi 12 IPS, 2460x1080, 6.79 | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60 | Nokia G22 IPS, 1600x720, 6.52 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -45% | -20% | -19% | -105% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 23.2 ? | 21.6 ? 7% | 34 ? -47% | 35.55 ? -53% | 60.2 ? -159% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 18.5 ? | 36.4 ? -97% | 17.2 ? 7% | 15.68 ? 15% | 27.7 ? -50% |
| PWM Frequency | 343500 | ||||
| Screen | 16% | 11% | -21% | 22% | |
| Brightness middle | 459 | 460 0% | 449 -2% | 465 1% | 674 47% |
| Brightness | 435 | 435 0% | 437 0% | 439 1% | 641 47% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 89 -2% | 95 4% | 89 -2% | 90 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.3 -0% | 0.5 -67% | 0.47 -57% | 0.43 -43% |
| Contrast | 1530 | 1533 0% | 898 -41% | 989 -35% | 1567 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.19 | 4.04 44% | 2.29 68% | 8.5 -18% | 4.45 38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.1 | 6.84 48% | 4.49 66% | 15.8 -21% | 7.41 43% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.4 | 5 40% | 3.7 56% | 11.8 -40% | 5.1 39% |
| Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.239 98% | 2.254 98% | 2.2 100% | 2.072 106% |
| CCT | 9402 69% | 7896 82% | 6198 105% | 10757 60% | 7799 83% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -15% /
4% | -5% /
4% | -20% /
-21% | -42% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17898 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 动力充足，外形美观
联发科 联发科 Helio G88是一款中端 SoC，可为日常任务提供充足的动力。虽然建议避免运行复杂的应用程序或进行过多的多任务处理，但在正常使用时，系统仍能保持流畅，不会出现卡顿。
在长时间负载情况下，43.5 °C的最高温度虽然明显，但并不严重，而且严格控制在局部范围内。此外，在 3DMark 压力测试中，SoC 的节流极小。
位于底部边缘的单声道扬声器相对较弱，往往会产生非常重的高音。这使得音乐或电影的音效大打折扣。为了获得更好的音频体验，建议通过 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙连接耳机或外置扬声器。幸运的是，这款手机支持几种重要的无线声音传输标准，包括 SBC、AAC、LDAC、aptX 和 aptX HD。
在我们的无线局域网测试中，5,000 毫安时电池的续航时间达到了惊人的 14 小时 26 分钟，让你在一般使用条件下无需充电即可使用一天。如有必要，可在最大 18 瓦的功率下为手机充电。值得一提的是，一个完整的充电周期需要 2 个多小时。
| Tecno Spark 10 Pro | Tecno Spark 10 5G | Xiaomi Redmi 12 | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | Nokia G22 | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 131% | 2% | -28% | 84% | -24% | 264% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 314.7 | 940.4 199% | 300 -5% | 298.69 -5% | 881 180% | 283 ? -10% | 1506 ? 379% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 239.8 | 490 104% | 272.5 14% | 200.17 -17% | 367 53% | 193 ? -20% | 1116 ? 365% |
| Random Read 4KB | 108.6 | 219.8 102% | 84.8 -22% | 55.9 -49% | 131 21% | 82.4 ? -24% | 247 ? 127% |
| Random Write 4KB | 95 | 208.2 119% | 115 21% | 55.86 -41% | 172 81% | 54 ? -43% | 272 ? 186% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Tecno Spark 10 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12 | |
| Tecno Spark 10 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Tecno Spark 10 Pro | |
| Tecno Spark 10 5G | |
| Nokia G22 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12 | |
发言人
Tecno Spark 10 Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia G22 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Nokia G22 | |
| Tecno Spark 10 5G | |
| Average of class Smartphone (424 - 2844, n=230, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Tecno Spark 10 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12 | |
Pros
Cons
评价--并非没有缺陷
Tecno Spark 10 Pro 要在竞争激烈的经济型中档手机市场中脱颖而出面临着挑战，特别是因为配备额外内存和独特外壳的独特机型目前在美国还没有销售。
不过，这款坚固的手机性能良好，电池续航时间可观，外壳做工精良。即使闪光灯速度不是很快，但全高清屏幕和 128 GB 存储空间还是物有所值。
但它也有一些局限性，比如 Wi-Fi 连接速度时有时无的降低、扬声器不合格以及预装软件过多，有些用户可能会觉得烦人。好的一面是，即使长时间使用，手机也能保持稳定的性能，屏幕也不会出现 PWM 闪烁。
Tecno Spark 10 Pro 拥有稳定的存储配置和适合日常使用的电池续航时间，但在其他方面很难在其他廉价中端手机中脱颖而出。
小米 小米红米 12拥有额外的蓝牙编解码器和更可定制的相机系统。追求 5G 的用户可以考虑价格稍高的 Tecno Spark 10 5G.
价格和供应情况
珍珠白版本在亚马逊网站上的售价为 150 美元。
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
-
09/20/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
