三星Galaxy A22 4G智能手机评测 - AMOLED在没有5G的中端智能手机中的应用

5G是愚蠢的。 如果你有时是这样想的，并且正在寻找一款不支持最新移动通信标准的中档智能手机，那么三星为你提供了一个报价。Galaxy A22 4G比其5G版本更紧凑，但在类似的价格下也更慢。那么，4G智能手机是否只是5G狂热者的东西？

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), Published 08/26/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

就像今天你很难想象曾经有没有LTE的智能手机一样，几年后你可能也找不到很多没有5G的智能手机。但在这一点上，三星奉行双管齐下的做法，提供其几款中端智能手机，一个版本为4G，另一个为5G。通过这种方式，那些不需要超高速移动连接的人仍然可以节省一些钱，或者他们可以吗？

好吧，如果你实际比较一下目前Galaxy A22 4G和 Galaxy A22 5G的价格，节省的钱最多是微不足道的。但至少我们在这次测试中更详细地评估的三星Galaxy A22 4G比它的5G兄弟姐妹更紧凑，还带来了AMOLED屏幕和相机的一些改进。那么这是一个真正的替代品吗？

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Galaxy A Series)

Processor

Mediatek Helio G80 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G52 MP2

Memory

4 GB

Display

6.40 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 274 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Super AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz

Storage

128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB

, 106 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 159.3 x 73.6

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 15W charging (Samsung AFC)

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 11

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/1.8, phase comparison AF, OIS, LED flash, videos @1080p/30fps (camera 1); 8.0MP, f/2.2, wide angle lens (camera 2); 2.0MP, f/2.4, macro lens (camera 3); 2.0MP, f/2.4, depth of field (camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, videos @1080p/30fps

Additional features

Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, 24 Months Warranty, FM radio; SAR: 0.516W/kg (head), 1.59W/kg (body) , fanless

Weight

186 g

Price

229 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
78.1 %	08/2021	Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2	186 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.40"	1600x720
79.6 %	08/2021	Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2	203 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.60"	2400x1080
81.1 %	08/2021	Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4	178.8 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.43"	2400x1080
81.8 %	09/2020	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC SD 732G, Adreno 618	215 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
81.7 %	04/2021	Realme 8 Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4	177 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.40"	2400x1080

外壳 - 简单的塑料在Galaxy 智能手机

总的来说，这个箱子看起来比下面的箱子简单一些 Galaxy A22 5G，反光的后盖是由相当普通的塑料制成的，有白色、黑色和淡紫的颜色。这款箱子看起来相当坚固，材料的过渡也很干净。圆角的设计有助于Galaxy 智能手机拿在手里时感觉良好。

6.4英寸的智能手机明显比其5G版本更小、更轻，这应该有利于那些手小的人。然而，与 realme 8或小米Redmi Note 10S，这个价位上也有更轻的智能手机。

Size Comparison

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Realme 8 Samsung Galaxy A22 4G DIN A6 ❌

设备 - 价格差异小

三星Galaxy A22 LTE有两个存储版本，厂商价格如下。

三星Galaxy A22 - 4GB内存/64GB存储：209欧元（约合人民币246元）。
三星Galaxy A22 - 4GB内存/128GB存储：229欧元（约合人民币269元

因此，价格差异不是很大。有NFC，允许你使用移动支付服务。

还有一个microSD插槽，让你可以选择大幅扩展存储。这是一个专用插槽，这样你就可以额外使用两张SIM卡。

微型SD卡读卡器

在我们向microSD传输数据的测试中，三星Galaxy A22 4G的表现与它的5G兄弟姐妹持平，总体上相当快。然而，在跨平台磁盘测试（CPDT）中，其数值在对比设备领域中相当居中。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	44.2 MB/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	44 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	18.76 MB/s ∼42% -58%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø32.2 (24.3-39.7)

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø28.8 (15.3-45.8)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø42.4 (35.4-50.9)

Realme 8 Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø35.8 (26.8-52.1)

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø54.7 (8-62.4)

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø70.7 (11.8-76.8)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø84.9 (50.7-89.2)

Realme 8 Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø71.7 (24.4-75.9)

软件--更新？也许...

基于Android 11的OneUI 3.1已经预装在三星Galaxy A22 4G上。三星的内部软件界面设计得很好，所有重要的操作元素都位于屏幕的底部，即使是手小的人也能尽可能舒适地操作智能手机。当然，这只是操作系统的情况，而第三方应用程序就不一定了。在本次测试时，安全补丁处于2021年5月的水平，应尽快更新。

不幸的是，与其他制造商不同，三星不愿意说明其智能手机的软件更新会有多长时间，所以我们只能希望Galaxy A22 4G的更新仍有一段时间。

虽然制造商已经预装了几个第三方应用程序，但你可以很容易地将它们卸载。

通信和GNSS - 三星智能手机的种类不多

三星Galaxy A22 WLAN模块的标准被称为 "WiFi 5"。在通信速度方面，该智能手机的表现达到了同类水平。然而，它不提供MIMO，如 Poco X3小米的MIMO，它能够使用它的数据速率几乎翻倍。我们的测试装置的数据传输速度保持相对稳定，但随着与路由器的距离增加，信号强度迅速下降。

三星Galaxy A22 4G不提供5G，提供的LTE频率种类也很一般。那些经常到远方旅行的人应该确保他们在旅行目的地能够用智能手机接入移动互联网。Galaxy 智能手机的接收强度还可以，但绝对有一些智能手机在同一地点获得更高的信号质量。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	633 (589^min - 676^max) MBit/s ∼100% +83%
Average of class Smartphone (16.9 - 1368, n=65, last 2 years)	534 MBit/s ∼84% +54%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	348 (340^min - 353^max) MBit/s ∼55% +1%
Realme 8 Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	346 (317^min - 353^max) MBit/s ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	346 (267^min - 353^max) MBit/s ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	283 (145^min - 322^max) MBit/s ∼45% -18%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	636 (500^min - 675^max) MBit/s ∼100% +94%
Average of class Smartphone (32.7 - 953, n=66, last 2 years)	499 MBit/s ∼78% +52%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	361 (322^min - 366^max) MBit/s ∼57% +10%
Realme 8 Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	335 (281^min - 350^max) MBit/s ∼53% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	328 (255^min - 340^max) MBit/s ∼52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	320 (299^min - 340^max) MBit/s ∼50% -2%

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø328 (255-340)

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø346 (267-353)

在我们走出门外很短的时间内，智能手机已经能够以2米的良好精度定位其位置。支持GPS、GLONASS、Galileo和北斗卫星网络并能迅速找到，SBAS也被用来提高精确度。

在我们的实际测试中，在一次自行车旅行中，我们也拿Garmin Edge 520作比较，三星智能手机显示自己的位置确定相当准确。虽然它仍然不完全准确，但定位精度足以满足日常导航的需要。

电话功能和语音质量 - 清晰度很一般

三星已经预装了自己的电话应用，它取代了谷歌的标准应用，其操作也同样直观。支持VoWiFi和VoLTE。

在通话过程中，使用内部听筒的最大音量时，我们对话伙伴的声音听起来有点夸张，并伴有其他噪音。我们自己也能用稍低的声音说话，但我们的声音听起来对我们的对话伙伴来说略显沉闷。

当使用内置扬声器的免提电话模式时，我们的对话伙伴听起来相当响亮，清晰度也可以接受。然而，我们不应该把声音压得太低，因为否则麦克风将无法记录。

照相机 - 带有OIS和微距镜头

在相机方面，如果你比较一下三星Galaxy A22 4G的指定设备和 Galaxy A22 5G，乍一看，你可能会认为它们有一个相同的相机系统。

然而，如果你仔细看看，你可能会看到一些差异：虽然Galaxy A22 4G也带来了4800万像素的摄像头，但它提供了光学图像稳定功能，这在5G版本中是没有的。此外，广角镜头的分辨率略高，还有一个专门的微距镜头，尽管它只有200万像素的分辨率。

因此，总的来说，只要你使用主摄像头，4G版本的相机系统甚至更灵活，更能防止模糊的结果。

根据不同的情况，用Galaxy A22 4G的主摄像头拍摄的照片与 A22 5G的照片相比显得非常不同。 Galaxy A22 5G.一般来说，它们的亮度略高。如果你聚焦在一个物体上，它的再现会更清晰一些，但如果你拍摄全景照片，结果会显得更模糊，尽管像素伪影没有5G型号那么明显。总的来说，这也是一款典型的价格级别的相机，并不真正突出，但在恶劣的光线条件和高对比度方面做得相当扎实。

由于其更高的分辨率，广角镜头确实能够拍摄出稍微详细的照片。然而，这仍然只使它更适合于没有放大太多的快照，因为很多细节会丢失。在镜头之间自动切换不可能放大几步，而是要直接手动切换。

视频最多能以全高清分辨率和30帧录制，与5G机型相比，这是个限制，因为5G机型至少可以实现2K。相反，自动对焦似乎更可靠。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Blume Hauptkamera Umgebung Hauptkamera Low Light Weitwinkelobjektiv

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

OnePlus 9 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

OnePlus 9 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

OnePlus 9 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

OnePlus 9 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

在实验室里对确定的光线条件下的记录进行评估，三星Galaxy A22 4G处于同类水平。乍一看，清晰度相当好，但在边缘处略有下降。色彩还原和对比度也显得很好。在弱光条件下，Galaxy A22 4G的照片比5G版本的照片照度稍好，但你仍然无法得到真正好的夜间照片。

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A22 4G: 7.95 ∆E min: 1.28 - max: 12.54 ∆E

配件和保修 - 大量的维修选择

除了手机之外，Galaxy 智能手机的包装盒还包括一条USB-C电缆和相应的充电器，以及一个SIM卡工具和各种文件。目前，三星在其网上商店没有提供任何针对该智能手机的配件。

保修期为24个月。三星提供了许多不同的选择，让智能手机得到维修，可以是现场维修或邮寄。你也可以在网上看到保修期外的标准维修选项https://www.samsung.com/us/support/service/.

输入设备和操作 - 一个快速传感器

触摸屏很准确，对角落里的输入也有反应。三星Galaxy A22的显示屏是一个90Hz的面板，这使得通过触摸屏的输入可以快速显示在屏幕上，导致主观上的操作更加顺畅。

指纹传感器被集成到侧面的待机按钮中。它工作迅速而可靠。当你触摸传感器的那一刻，Galaxy 智能手机就已经解锁了。也支持人脸识别，但这种方法有时会比通过指纹传感器解锁更麻烦，因为你首先要把智能手机从待机状态唤醒。

显示屏 - AMOLED，但颜色较暗

与它的5G兄弟姐妹相比， Galaxy A22 4G版本的大优势可能是AMOLED屏幕。然而，这似乎是一个非常暗的显示屏，几乎没有比350cd/m²更亮的地方，因此不适合在户外使用它。

此外，在扩大的720p，分辨率明显低于全高清分辨率的Galaxy A22 5G和所有其他对比设备的全高清分辨率。当然，这种差异在6.4英寸的智能手机中并不像在30英寸或更大的电视中那样严重明显。然而，在直接比较中，稍显浑浊的图像是明显可见的。


341 cd/m²	352 cd/m²	369 cd/m²
338 cd/m²	349 cd/m²	366 cd/m²
339 cd/m²	347 cd/m²	365 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 369 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 351.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.73 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 349 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.87 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
140.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.07

	Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Super AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.40	Samsung Galaxy A22 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.60	Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67	Realme 8 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Screen		-4%	64%	45%	44%
Brightness middle	349	415 19%	706 102%	623 79%	590 69%
Brightness	352	378 7%	701 99%	600 70%	607 72%
Brightness Distribution	92	76 -17%	98 7%	93 1%	92 0%
Black Level *		0.26		0.54
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.87	5.41 8%	2.1 64%	1.8 69%	2.64 55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	15.51	9.77 37%	4.9 68%	4.7 70%	6.85 56%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	4.8 -78%	1.5 44%	3.3 -22%	2.4 11%
Gamma	2.07 ^106%	2.348 ^94%	2.29 ^96%	2.26 ^97%	2.265 ^97%
CCT	6970 ^93%	7748 ^84%	6447 ^101%	6712 ^97%	6913 ^94%
Contrast		1596		1154

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

127.6 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 127.6 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 127.6 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19035 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在我们用CalMAN软件和光谱光度计进行的测试中，我们确定在 "鲜艳 "预设中，色彩再现是相当不准确的。根据我们的经验，在 "自然 "模式下情况应该会好一些，但对于AMOLED显示屏来说，其色彩精确度最多只能算是一般。

显示屏在OLED的典型频率下会闪烁，所以敏感的人在购买前应该先在低亮度下试一下屏幕。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.2 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms).

由于显示屏是暗色的，在明亮的环境中，反光会成为一个强烈的障碍，所以如果你退到阴凉处会更好。在可视角度方面，如果你从顶部看显示屏，会有非常轻微的变暗，但总的来说，从任何位置都可以轻松阅读显示屏内容。

性能--Galaxy 智能手机中的中端力量

这款联发科Helio G80是一个中端SoC，但对比设备都使用了更多最新和强大的SoC，尽管属于类似的价格范围。

那么，三星Galaxy A22 4G是否有点弱？并非如此。对于日常任务和许多应用程序来说，其性能是足够的，但你只是在其他地方获得更多的权力，以完成更多的任务，并行运行几个应用程序，或一个更流畅的系统。

在图形性能方面，这款智能手机也仍然落后。虽然乍一看，低分辨率的显示屏给人的印象是ARM Mali-G52 MP2做得相当好，但如果你看的是测试结果而不是屏幕，就会发现在公平竞争中，所有的对比设备都是领先的。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	364 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	564 Points ∼69% +55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	507 Points ∼62% +39%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	567 Points ∼69% +56%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	532 Points ∼65% +46%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (300 - 387, n=11)	358 Points ∼44% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 1885, n=237, last 2 years)	822 Points ∼100% +126%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1370 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1712 Points ∼65% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1685 Points ∼64% +23%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1787 Points ∼68% +30%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	1689 Points ∼64% +23%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (790 - 1370, n=11)	1270 Points ∼48% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 5538, n=237, last 2 years)	2640 Points ∼100% +93%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1145 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1376 Points ∼39% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2258 Points ∼65% +97%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1090 Points ∼31% -5%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	2400 Points ∼69% +110%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1109 - 1203, n=10)	1160 Points ∼33% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (79 - 9992, n=173, last 2 years)	3496 Points ∼100% +205%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1132 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1392 Points ∼43% +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2248 Points ∼69% +99%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1291 Points ∼40% +14%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	2314 Points ∼71% +104%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1100 - 1168, n=10)	1134 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (368 - 10711, n=162, last 2 years)	3252 Points ∼100% +187%

PCMark for Android
Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	6570 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	7434 Points ∼69% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	8236 Points ∼77% +25%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	8799 Points ∼82% +34%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	10373 Points ∼97% +58%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (5589 - 8120, n=9)	6424 Points ∼60% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (4780 - 28378, n=226, last 2 years)	10705 Points ∼100% +63%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	6168 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	8101 Points ∼81% +31%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	9957 Points ∼100% +61%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (6168 - 8795, n=3)	7899 Points ∼79% +28%
Average of class Smartphone (5279 - 13282, n=26, last 2 years)	9601 Points ∼96% +56%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1750 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3357 Points ∼89% +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3202 Points ∼85% +83%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3784 Points ∼100% +116%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	2542 Points ∼67% +45%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1536 - 1845, n=8)	1704 Points ∼45% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (574 - 9221, n=98, last 2 years)	3357 Points ∼89% +92%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1604 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3442 Points ∼88% +115%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3558 Points ∼91% +122%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3917 Points ∼100% +144%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	2398 Points ∼61% +50%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1369 - 1701, n=8)	1555 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (517 - 13263, n=98, last 2 years)	3650 Points ∼93% +128%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2565 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3090 Points ∼91% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2372 Points ∼70% -8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3382 Points ∼100% +32%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	3222 Points ∼95% +26%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (2442 - 2686, n=8)	2574 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (937 - 4609, n=98, last 2 years)	2978 Points ∼88% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1783 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3565 Points ∼52% +100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3120 Points ∼46% +75%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3918 Points ∼58% +120%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	3293 Points ∼48% +85%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1736 - 2054, n=8)	1799 Points ∼26% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (599 - 18846, n=164, last 2 years)	6808 Points ∼100% +282%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1630 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3619 Points ∼33% +122%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3335 Points ∼31% +105%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	4086 Points ∼37% +151%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	3285 Points ∼30% +102%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1578 - 1903, n=8)	1652 Points ∼15% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (541 - 36477, n=163, last 2 years)	10911 Points ∼100% +569%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2654 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3389 Points ∼90% +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2547 Points ∼67% -4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3425 Points ∼91% +29%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	3323 Points ∼88% +25%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (2552 - 2846, n=8)	2677 Points ∼71% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (954 - 7019, n=163, last 2 years)	3782 Points ∼100% +43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1354 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2360 Points ∼86% +74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2587 Points ∼94% +91%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2713 Points ∼99% +100%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	2745 Points ∼100% +103%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1319 - 1384, n=10)	1351 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=128, last 2 years)	2509 Points ∼91% +85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1198 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2217 Points ∼84% +85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2633 Points ∼100% +120%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2559 Points ∼97% +114%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	2633 Points ∼100% +120%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1165 - 1204, n=10)	1189 Points ∼45% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=128, last 2 years)	2513 Points ∼95% +110%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2492 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3047 Points ∼89% +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2436 Points ∼71% -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3436 Points ∼100% +38%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	3228 Points ∼94% +30%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (2347 - 2669, n=10)	2524 Points ∼73% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=128, last 2 years)	2998 Points ∼87% +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1379 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2463 Points ∼46% +79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2682 Points ∼50% +94%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2865 Points ∼54% +108%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	2754 Points ∼52% +100%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1347 - 1387, n=9)	1366 Points ∼26% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 16100, n=202, last 2 years)	5338 Points ∼100% +287%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1211 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2290 Points ∼28% +89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2743 Points ∼33% +127%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2735 Points ∼33% +126%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	2712 Points ∼33% +124%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1179 - 1875, n=9)	1274 Points ∼15% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 192870, n=201, last 2 years)	8257 Points ∼100% +582%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2675 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3350 Points ∼91% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2488 Points ∼67% -7%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3438 Points ∼93% +29%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	2914 Points ∼79% +9%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (2564 - 2830, n=9)	2672 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (839 - 7042, n=201, last 2 years)	3691 Points ∼100% +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1375 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2244 Points ∼79% +63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2641 Points ∼93% +92%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2506 Points ∼89% +82%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	2826 Points ∼100% +106%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1327 - 1398, n=10)	1366 Points ∼48% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6439, n=120, last 2 years)	2342 Points ∼83% +70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1224 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2141 Points ∼74% +75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2845 Points ∼99% +132%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2427 Points ∼84% +98%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	2878 Points ∼100% +135%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1174 - 1242, n=10)	1213 Points ∼42% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=120, last 2 years)	2431 Points ∼84% +99%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2423 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2698 Points ∼95% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2110 Points ∼75% -13%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2827 Points ∼100% +17%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	2656 Points ∼94% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (2169 - 2698, n=10)	2456 Points ∼87% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1567 - 3525, n=120, last 2 years)	2609 Points ∼92% +8%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	679 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1094 Points ∼36% +61%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	835 Points ∼27% +23%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	1493 Points ∼49% +120%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (679 - 692, n=9)	687 Points ∼23% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (370 - 10062, n=176, last 2 years)	3052 Points ∼100% +349%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	686 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1074 Points ∼23% +57%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	720 Points ∼15% +5%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	1502 Points ∼32% +119%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (682 - 705, n=9)	687 Points ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (366 - 14566, n=214, last 2 years)	4729 Points ∼100% +589%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	174 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	100 Points ∼8% -43%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	278 Points ∼22% +60%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (171 - 177, n=9)	174.6 Points ∼14% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 3877, n=217, last 2 years)	1267 Points ∼100% +628%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	173 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1073 Points ∼85% +520%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	258 Points ∼20% +49%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (171 - 186, n=9)	174.4 Points ∼14% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (101 - 3792, n=210, last 2 years)	1262 Points ∼100% +629%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	59 fps ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	52 fps ∼65% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	60 fps ∼75% +2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps ∼75% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (39 - 59, n=6)	49.7 fps ∼63% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=186, last 2 years)	79.5 fps ∼100% +35%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	44 fps ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	61 fps ∼31% +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	85 fps ∼43% +93%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	91 fps ∼46% +107%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (41 - 44, n=6)	43.5 fps ∼22% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 497, n=186, last 2 years)	199.5 fps ∼100% +353%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	42 fps ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	33 fps ∼49% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	49 fps ∼73% +17%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	34 fps ∼51% -19%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (21 - 43, n=6)	35.2 fps ∼53% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 161, n=187, last 2 years)	66.7 fps ∼100% +59%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	24 fps ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	37 fps ∼33% +54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	52 fps ∼46% +117%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	45 fps ∼40% +88%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (23 - 24, n=6)	23.8 fps ∼21% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 331, n=188, last 2 years)	112.9 fps ∼100% +370%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	30 fps ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	21 fps ∼39% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	31 fps ∼58% +3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	28 fps ∼52% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (13 - 31, n=6)	24.3 fps ∼45% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 143, n=188, last 2 years)	53.5 fps ∼100% +78%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	15 fps ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	24 fps ∼31% +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	32 fps ∼42% +113%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	33 fps ∼43% +120%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (14 - 16, n=6)	14.8 fps ∼19% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 223, n=188, last 2 years)	76.9 fps ∼100% +413%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	16 fps ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	11 fps ∼30% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	18 fps ∼50% +13%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps ∼47% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (8 - 17, n=6)	13.4 fps ∼37% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 110, n=188, last 2 years)	36.3 fps ∼100% +127%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	9.3 fps ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	14 fps ∼30% +51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	19 fps ∼41% +104%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	19 fps ∼41% +104%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (8.6 - 9.4, n=6)	9.18 fps ∼20% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=188, last 2 years)	46.9 fps ∼100% +404%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	17 fps ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	13 fps ∼35% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	19 fps ∼51% +12%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps ∼48% +6%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	19 fps ∼51% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (8 - 18, n=10)	12.2 fps ∼32% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=237, last 2 years)	37.6 fps ∼100% +121%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	9.2 fps ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	15 fps ∼31% +63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	20 fps ∼41% +117%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	20 fps ∼41% +117%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	21 fps ∼43% +128%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (8.2 - 9.2, n=10)	9 fps ∼18% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1.9 - 175, n=238, last 2 years)	48.9 fps ∼100% +432%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	9.5 fps ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	8.1 fps ∼30% -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	12 fps ∼45% +26%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps ∼41% +16%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	12 fps ∼45% +26%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (5.1 - 11, n=10)	7.38 fps ∼27% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 100, n=238, last 2 years)	26.9 fps ∼100% +183%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	3.3 fps ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	5.5 fps ∼29% +67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	7.4 fps ∼39% +124%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	7.5 fps ∼40% +127%
Realme 8 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	7.7 fps ∼41% +133%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (3.1 - 3.3, n=10)	3.26 fps ∼17% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 68, n=238, last 2 years)	18.9 fps ∼100% +473%

Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	204547 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	287506 Points ∼44% +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	330876 Points ∼50% +62%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	345356 Points ∼53% +69%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (204040 - 232228, n=5)	212027 Points ∼32% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (111952 - 1322448, n=162, last 2 years)	657739 Points ∼100% +222%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	180920 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	249843 Points ∼68% +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	282417 Points ∼77% +56%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	279048 Points ∼76% +54%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (177851 - 181928, n=4)	180245 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (101336 - 725649, n=39, last 2 years)	365421 Points ∼100% +102%

AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	7242 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	8794 Points ∼20% +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	6118 Points ∼14% -16%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	35458 Points ∼81% +390%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (6865 - 7292, n=4)	7077 Points ∼16% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1043 - 286905, n=119, last 2 years)	43735 Points ∼100% +504%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2346 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3005 Points ∼59% +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1566 Points ∼31% -33%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3477 Points ∼68% +48%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (2072 - 2400, n=7)	2245 Points ∼44% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 9585, n=162, last 2 years)	5127 Points ∼100% +119%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	5353 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	6486 Points ∼73% +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2083 Points ∼23% -61%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	6542 Points ∼74% +22%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (4045 - 5452, n=7)	4817 Points ∼54% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (2565 - 19657, n=162, last 2 years)	8874 Points ∼100% +66%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2843 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	4473 Points ∼79% +57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1012 Points ∼18% -64%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	4041 Points ∼72% +42%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (2343 - 3101, n=7)	2642 Points ∼47% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 11617, n=162, last 2 years)	5641 Points ∼100% +98%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1811 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2398 Points ∼22% +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3178 Points ∼29% +75%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3960 Points ∼36% +119%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1735 - 1818, n=7)	1787 Points ∼16% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 30125, n=162, last 2 years)	11140 Points ∼100% +515%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1099 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1172 Points ∼81% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	898 Points ∼62% -18%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1395 Points ∼96% +27%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1069 - 1243, n=7)	1139 Points ∼79% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2392, n=162, last 2 years)	1448 Points ∼100% +32%

在浏览器基准测试中，该智能手机的结果在同类产品中属于平均水平。在实践中，网站的加载时间可能稍长，特别是在滚动时，你必须短暂地等待图片。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (17.3 - 282, n=164, last 2 years)	85.4 Points ∼100% +171%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	52.6 Points ∼62% +67%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)	38.21 Points ∼45% +21%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (29 - 38.7, n=7)	33.1 Points ∼39% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)	31.57 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)	16.92 Points ∼20% -46%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (27.5 - 414, n=77, last 2 years)	136 Points ∼100% +143%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	90.6 Points ∼67% +62%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)	78.4 Points ∼58% +40%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (54 - 60.8, n=6)	56.8 Points ∼42% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)	55.9 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)	26.66 Points ∼20% -52%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (13.3 - 375, n=154, last 2 years)	79.8 runs/min ∼100% +174%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	43.9 runs/min ∼55% +51%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chome 92)	37.2 runs/min ∼47% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chome 92)	29.1 runs/min ∼36%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (21.8 - 30, n=7)	27.7 runs/min ∼35% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)	14.7 runs/min ∼18% -49%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (34 - 292, n=145, last 2 years)	112.4 Points ∼100% +120%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	72 Points ∼64% +41%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)	58 Points ∼52% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)	51 Points ∼45%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (43 - 54, n=6)	48 Points ∼43% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)	28 Points ∼25% -45%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 74261, n=193, last 2 years)	29491 Points ∼100% +161%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	17398 Points ∼59% +54%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)	16870 Points ∼57% +49%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (10432 - 12744, n=8)	11548 Points ∼39% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)	11313 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)	4808 Points ∼16% -58%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)	10797 ms * ∼100% -222%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (3227 - 4076, n=7)	3537 ms * ∼33% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)	3349 ms * ∼31%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	2673 ms * ∼25% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)	2543 ms * ∼24% +24%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 10031, n=167, last 2 years)	1950 ms * ∼18% +42%

* ... smaller is better

你必须满足于Galaxy A22 4G中较慢的eMMC内存。在存储速度方面，这已经不足以跟上同价位的设备了。

	Samsung Galaxy A22 4G	Samsung Galaxy A22 5G	Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC	Realme 8	Average 128 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		9%	65%	39%	55%	-9%	235%
Sequential Read 256KB	297.7	300.5 1%	498.8 68%	506 70%	526 77%	289 ?(106.7 - 511, n=59) -3%	1186 ?(215 - 4512, n=232, last 2 years) 298%
Sequential Write 256KB	183	210.3 15%	372 103%	173.1 -5%	187.8 3%	193.5 ?(90 - 314, n=59) 6%	753 ?(57.5 - 3062, n=232, last 2 years) 311%
Random Read 4KB	101.2	118 17%	110.5 9%	123.4 22%	144 42%	82.7 ?(10.1 - 247, n=59) -18%	208 ?(22.2 - 543, n=232, last 2 years) 106%
Random Write 4KB	66.9	69.2 3%	121 81%	112.6 68%	133 99%	53 ?(5.3 - 159.9, n=59) -21%	218 ?(13 - 572, n=233, last 2 years) 226%

游戏--也有可能超过60帧

当游戏时，Galaxy A22 4G证明，即使在这个价格级别的2D游戏中，明显超过60帧是很有可能的。"Armajet"的平均运行速度为67 fps，虽然比A22 4G的运行速度要低得多。 Galaxy A22 5G，但仍然超过了许多其他设备，这些设备只是没有为高帧数进行优化。在这方面，游戏的发行商与智能手机制造商面临着类似的挑战。

在"PUBG Mobile"中，我们看到了这个价格级别的通常行为：在低细节水平下，有时可以达到40帧，但除此之外，大多数游戏运行在30帧，还不时出现一些停顿。我们用GameBench测量帧率。.

在控制游戏方面，Galaxy A22 4G打出了一个体面的数字。触摸屏的反应迅速而可靠，位置传感器也很好地完成了工作。

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G; Armajet; 1.60.13: Ø66.8 (50-83)

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 3.0.2a: Ø29.1 (18-31)

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 3.0.2a: Ø28.9 (14-31)

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.5.0: Ø38.9 (34-41)

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.5.0: Ø29.4 (15-32)

排放 - 温暖，但没有节制

温度

45.4°C（~114°F）是一个相当高的最大热发展，在常规环境温度下已经可以让人略感不适。然而，这种温度发展并没有达到危险的程度，尽管在更热的日子里它甚至可能显著增加。

至少，系统温度对性能几乎没有任何影响，正如3DMark的压力测试场景告诉我们的。在这里，智能手机能够保持至少98.3%的启动性能，即使在长时间的负载之后。

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	99.2 (4.13^min - 4.17^max) % ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	99 (1098^min - 1109^max) % ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	96.6 (807^min - 835^max) % ∼97% -3%
Realme 8 Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	87.4 (1323^min - 1514^max) % ∼88% -12%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	98.8 (316^min - 320^max) % ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	97.9 (1.037^min - 1.059^max) % ∼99%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	97.5 (271^min - 278^max) % ∼99% 0%

Max. Load

Idle


45 °C	40.6 °C	37.6 °C
45.4 °C	40.3 °C	37.8 °C
45.2 °C	40.7 °C	37.5 °C

Maximum: 45.4 °C
Average: 41.1 °C


34.6 °C	39.4 °C	40.8 °C
33.9 °C	40 °C	45.4 °C
36.8 °C	41.6 °C	45.4 °C

Maximum: 45.4 °C
Average: 39.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.6 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 34.9 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 54.6 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.6 °C / 91 F.

演讲者

Galaxy 智能手机的扬声器产生的音量比5G版本的A22略低，但这仍足以满足日常使用。声音频谱略微过度强调了高频，正如你在这个价格级别所期望的那样。然而，即使在最大音量下，它仍然不会让耳朵听起来很夸张。

你可以通过蓝牙或3.5毫米音频端口连接外部扬声器或耳机。虽然这样做没有任何问题，但对于无线传输来说，没有支持aptX编解码器来通过蓝牙改善声音。你可以通过听力测试将音频输出调整到你的个人听力。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命--充电缓慢Galaxy

消耗功率

就其功耗而言，智能手机在一个相对狭窄的范围内运行。因此，当你不经常使用它时，它往往更耗电，而当有高负荷时，则相当高效。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.5 / 2.1 / 2.5 Watt
Load	2.9 / 4.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Samsung Galaxy A22 4G 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A22 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh	Average Mediatek Helio G80	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		12%	17%	-23%	-9%	2%
Idle Minimum *	1.5	0.9 40%	0.69 54%	0.93 38%	1.044 ?(0.37 - 1.6, n=7) 30%	0.88 ?(0.12 - 2.37, n=173, last 2 years) 41%
Idle Average *	2.1	1.3 38%	1.46 30%	2.47 -18%	2.01 ?(0.9 - 4.22, n=7) 4%	1.48 ?(0.65 - 2.98, n=173, last 2 years) 30%
Idle Maximum *	2.5	1.7 32%	1.5 40%	2.51 -0%	2.35 ?(1.6 - 4.37, n=7) 6%	1.695 ?(0.69 - 3.11, n=173, last 2 years) 32%
Load Average *	2.9	3.8 -31%	3.67 -27%	5.62 -94%	4.19 ?(2.8 - 6.12, n=7) -44%	4.27 ?(2.1 - 10, n=173, last 2 years) -47%
Load Maximum *	4.9	5.8 -18%	5.58 -14%	6.93 -41%	7.02 ?(4.9 - 9.14, n=7) -43%	7.1 ?(3.56 - 13.7, n=173, last 2 years) -45%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G: Ø3.8 (0.967-7.64)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.91 (2.32-5.27)

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.15 (1.9-2.49)

电池寿命

在电池寿命方面，Galaxy A22的4G和5G版本之间几乎没有任何区别。虽然两者都能从其5000毫安时的电池中获得大量的电池寿命，但它们的优势在于不同的场景中。在我们的WLAN测试中，Galaxy A22 4G的持续时间略长，而Galaxy A22 5G在处理更苛刻的任务时表现出更多的耐力。然而，这些差异总体上是非常小的。在整体比较中，两款智能手机都做得相当好。

另一方面，三星在充电方面已经不太跟得上时代了。Galaxy A22 4G的充电功率最大为15瓦，这意味着有时你可能需要等待2个多小时才能将电池完全充电。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		47h 47min
WiFi Websurfing