Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy A14 LTE 智能手机评测--这是升级吗?

基本Galaxy. Galaxy A14 是三星 A 系列的入门机型。我们测试的是配备 4G 和 64 GB 存储空间的基本机型。即使是最小的 "A "智能手机,也会产生Galaxy 的感觉,还是设备已经过时?
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Galaxy A 系列代表了三星智能手机的中端产品,而 A14 则是该系列的入门机型。制造商为该设备提供了 5G和 4G 版本,但这两款设备不仅在移动通信标准方面存在差异,在处理器等方面也不尽相同。我们的测试机是 LTE 版本,这也是购买 A 系列机型最实惠的选择。

Galaxy A14 也有两种存储版本,存储容量为 64 或 128 GB。此外,制造商还提供三种颜色:黑色、银色和绿色。64 GB 版本的建议零售价为 179 欧元(约合 199 美元)。虽然我们对 A13 的高分辨率显示屏赞不绝口 Galaxy A13的高分辨率显示屏大加赞赏的同时,我们也对处理器的低性能感到不满。让我们来看看三星在继任者身上做了哪些改变。

Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Galaxy A10 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G80 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixel 400 PPI, capacitive, PLS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 46.7 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, GSM: 850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz; UMTS: B1, B5, B8; LTE: B1, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20, B28, B38, B40, B41, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.1 x 167.7 x 78
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8) + 5 MP (ultrawide f/2.2) + 2 MP (macro f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: mono, Keyboard: onscreen, SIM tool, USB cable (Type-C to Type-C), One UI 5.1, 24 Months Warranty, Single band GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1), BeiDou (B1); SAR head: 0.90 W/Kg, SAR body: 1.05 W/Kg, Camera2 API: Level 3; DRM Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
201 g
Price
219 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
75.9 %
07/2023
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
201 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2408x1080
76.5 %
05/2022
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1
195 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2408x1080
81 %
07/2022
Motorola Moto G52
SD 680, Adreno 610
169 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2400x1080
78.9 %
11/2022
Xiaomi Poco M5
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
201 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.58"2408x1080
80.1 %
05/2023
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
SD 685, Adreno 610
188 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080

与同价位手机一样,三星Galaxy A14 的外壳采用塑料材质。机身背面采用了纹理设计,握持感更强。三个摄像头的凸起从背面伸出,当手机放在桌子上时,输入时会摇晃。

这款智能手机的抗翘曲性能不错,使用时不会产生任何嘎吱嘎吱的声音。按键的着力点很好,但音量摇杆在我们的测试机上有些轻微的晃动。 电源键很容易用拇指触及,但要操作音量摇杆则需要伸长手掌。在测试期间,我们没有注意到智能手机上有任何划痕。 A14 的购买者不得不忍受没有 IP 认证的情况,而且 SIM 卡插槽周围也没有明显的密封条。

尺寸比较

167.7 mm 78 mm 9.1 mm 201 g165.1 mm 76.4 mm 8.8 mm 195 g165.9 mm 76.2 mm 8 mm 188 g164 mm 76.1 mm 8.9 mm 201 g160.1 mm 74.5 mm 8 mm 169 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 -Galaxy A14,三卡槽

在Galaxy A13 和 A12 使用相同的 SoC 之后,三星为 A14 提供了升级,使用联发科 Helio G80 作为 CPU。它还配备了 Mali-G52 MP2 图形处理器。

测试机的 64GB 存储容量可通过使用 microSD 卡进行扩展。此外,这款智能手机还支持双 SIM 卡,可在一个三层插槽中接受两张物理 SIM 卡。另一个值得称赞的地方是,三星还在厚厚的边框上安装了一个 3.5 毫米音频接口。A14 还提供 NFC 功能,但 USB-C 连接仅支持 USB-2.0 标准。

左:SIM 卡插槽
左:SIM 卡插槽
右侧带指纹传感器的电源按钮、音量摇杆
右侧带指纹传感器的电源按钮、音量摇杆
首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
底部:耳机端口、麦克风、USB、扬声器
底部:耳机端口、麦克风、USB、扬声器

microSD 读卡器

三星为Galaxy A14 配备了一个 microSD 读卡器,可处理最大 1 TB 的卡,并支持 exFAT 标准。在使用我们的 Angelbird AV PRO V60 参考卡进行的测试中,A14 以同类产品中最快的传输速率给人留下了深刻印象。它的速度明显快于前代产品 A13,是其他测试产品的两倍多。传输速率也很稳定。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
50 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
34.3 MB/s -31%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
24.6 MB/s -51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
23.6 MB/s -53%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.56 MB/s -59%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø34.3 (26.7-47.7)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.8 (17.6-38.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.3 (27.4-50)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.3 (37-79.3)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø50 (37.9-54.4)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.5 (28-82.5)

软件 - 三星承诺进行两次大规模Android 更新

Galaxy A14 预装了Android 13。三星在 5.1 版本中使用自己的 One UI 调整了基本软件。制造商承诺为 A14 提供两次大型软件更新和四年的安全更新。在本次测试时,安全补丁仍然是 2023 年 4 月的,因此我们假设更新周期为每季度一次。

在交付状态下,预装了一些第三方应用程序,如 Facebook、Otto 或 Market Guru,但它们都可以顺利卸载。另一方面,一些标准程序如计算器或秒表也没有安装,但你当然可以通过 Play Store 进行安装。

除了典型的谷歌应用程序外,三星还安装了自己的软件,如日历或图库,制造商还提供了自己的应用程序商店Galaxy Store。通过 Game Launcher,制造商还可以将所有游戏集中到一个地方。该软件还可以阻止游戏过程中的所有通知或记录游戏过程。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 5 和精确定位

三星在Galaxy A14 中使用了 WiFi 5 标准。在与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器的测试中,WLAN 连接被证明是稳定的。尽管传输速率并不突出,但与同价位的产品相比,还是处于不错的水平。

Galaxy A14 支持欧洲所需的所有常用频段,但只有一个版本适用于整个欧洲。在我们的测试中,接收效果并不明显。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=208, last 2 years)
659 MBit/s +96%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
356 (333min - 363max) MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
337 (68min - 354max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
328 (300min - 339max) MBit/s -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
286 (267min - 310max) MBit/s -15%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
283 (244min - 311max) MBit/s -16%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=209, last 2 years)
694 MBit/s +90%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
370 (332min - 381max) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
365 (331min - 379max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
356 (293min - 370max) MBit/s -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
325 (290min - 347max) MBit/s -11%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
292 MBit/s -20%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mediatek Helio G80, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø328 (68-354)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø286 (267-310)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mediatek Helio G80, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø365 (331-379)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø325 (290-347)
室内 GNSS 连接
室内 GNSS 连接
户外 GNSS 连接
户外 GNSS 连接

A14 凭借其卫星连接功能大放异彩。虽然这款智能手机仅使用单频连接进行定位,但它支持包括 SBAS 在内的所有常用网络。

无论是在室外还是在室内,它都能快速准确地定位。在一次自行车旅行中,我们也使用 Garmin Venu 2 作为参考,A14 准确的路线记录给我们留下了深刻印象。

全球导航卫星系统测量:环湖
全球导航卫星系统测量:环湖
全球导航卫星系统测量:转折点
全球导航卫星系统测量:转折点
全球导航卫星系统测量:概述
全球导航卫星系统测量:概述

电话功能和语音质量 -Galaxy A14 运行正常

三星在Galaxy A14 上使用了自己的电话应用程序。该软件设计清晰,惊喜不多。Galaxy A14 支持无线局域网通话。

Galaxy A14 在语音质量方面没有表现出任何弱点。A14 用户的语音传输清晰,听筒的语音还原也不错。Galaxy A14 还能顺利地通过免提电话接听电话。总的来说,对背景噪音的抑制还可以做得更好,因为它们经常也会被传输。

摄像头 -Galaxy A14 的主摄像头性能良好

SamsungGalaxy A14 自拍照
SamsungGalaxy A14 自拍照

三星在Galaxy A14 的背面采用了三摄像头设置。组合中的主角显然是 5000 万像素的主摄像头。在光线充足的条件下,照片的清晰度尚可,但锐利度稍有欠缺。色彩还原相当苍白。移动会导致模糊和条纹。但考虑到市场建议零售价,主摄像头的性能还是不错的。HDR 模式的效果也不错。另一方面,你应该放弃使用数码变焦,因为其结果会非常模糊。

好在三星还在Galaxy A14 中提供了专业模式:可选择手动调节 ISO、快门速度、光圈、焦距和白平衡。通常情况下,A14 的摄像头采用像素二进制,但您也可以使用 50-MP 的完整分辨率拍照。此外,这款智能手机还提供全景模式和各种艺术和美食滤镜预设。

在微距模式下,A14 使用了一个独立的 2 百万像素微距镜头。遗憾的是,效果很少能让人接受。要识别一些细节,物体上肯定需要大量光线。500 万像素超广角镜头的效果稍好一些,但照片的边缘仍然很模糊。

1300 万像素前置摄像头拍照效果不错,背景模糊的人像拍摄也很成功。滑块控制是一个不错的功能,用户可以调整模糊程度。事后还可以在图库中进行修改。三星放弃了前置摄像头的自动对焦功能,而且没有一个镜头提供光学图像稳定器。

录制视频并不是Galaxy A14 的强项之一。所有镜头的最高分辨率都是 30 FPS 的 FHD。背面主摄像头的自动对焦功能可快速、可靠地工作,但您仍然需要一只稳定的手,否则录制的视频很容易变得模糊。在操作相机、浏览模式或在相机和图库之间切换时,会出现一些明显的卡顿,操作并不流畅。这与 A14 的操作速度总体较慢有关。但快门释放的速度仍然很快。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HaseSeeUltraweitwinkel5x ZoomLow Light

我们喜欢主摄像头在可控光线条件下的清晰度。清晰度仅在边缘部分有所下降。另一方面,测试图像在极弱光线(1 Lux)下几乎无法辨认,细节丢失严重。

三星在色彩调整方面做得很好。在强光下,偏差较小,最大的偏差出现在深绿色。但总体而言,色彩还原非常均匀。

ColorChecker
6.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE: 5.86 ∆E min: 2.83 - max: 10.28 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.4 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
76.1 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
92 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE: 46.82 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 92.01 ∆E

配件和保修 -Galaxy A14 不含充电器

Galaxy A14 的随机附件非常有限。三星只随智能手机附送了一条 USB 数据线(Type-C 到 Type-C)、一本快速入门手册和一个 SIM 卡工具。我们在Galaxy A14 的包装盒中没有找到充电器或保护套。显示屏也没有保护盖。

在德国,三星为 A14 提供 24 个月的保修服务。Galaxy A14 一年的三星 Care+ 服务费为 24 欧元(约合 27 美元),如果加上防盗保护,一年的服务费为 33 欧元(约合 37 美元)。

输入设备和操作 - A14 键入时出现卡顿

三星使用自己的三星键盘输入。该软件提供了许多调整功能,可实现个性化输入。对于横向输入,键盘是分体式的,这有利于在大显示屏上打字。

触摸屏的滑动特性良好,在测试中没有出现输入错误。 不过,系统速度较低的问题在打字时甚至会很明显,输入的内容只能延迟显示,键盘动画也明显卡顿。

Galaxy A14 可以通过电源按钮上的指纹识别器或 2D 人脸识别解锁。指纹识别很可靠,但在解锁前设备需要思考一秒钟。人脸识别使用前置摄像头,因此不安全。在光线充足的情况下,人脸识别是可靠的,但 A14 在这方面并不是市场上最快的。

显示屏 - 大而暗的三星 LCD 面板

子像素网格
子像素网格

尽管Galaxy A14 的显示屏上下边框较大,但其 401 ppi 的分辨率仍然给人留下了深刻印象。PLS LCD 显示屏尺寸为 6.6 英寸,刷新率为 60 Hz,扫描频率为 117 Hz。

单从外观上看,Galaxy A14 的显示屏给人留下了不错的印象,但与同价位的竞争对手相比,其他产品的性价比更高。摩托罗拉 摩托罗拉 Moto G52Redmi Note 12就使用了 OLED 面板。

除了Poco M5 之外,所有对比设备的显示屏都更亮,色彩还原调整得更好。甚至Galaxy A13 的前代产品的面板在我们的所有测试中都取得了更好的效果。

但至少面板的亮度分布相当均匀。虽然我们测得显示屏有些闪烁,但由于其频率高达 343500 赫兹,我们几乎不指望会有任何限制。

436
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 465 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 439.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.47 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 465 cd/m²
Contrast: 989:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 11.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
97.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Motorola Moto G52
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.60
Xiaomi Poco M5
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.58
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
27%
59%
42%
58%
Brightness middle
465
553
19%
655
41%
400
-14%
650
40%
Brightness
439
506
15%
649
48%
396
-10%
658
50%
Brightness Distribution
89
87
-2%
95
7%
96
8%
97
9%
Black Level *
0.47
0.44
6%
0.27
43%
Contrast
989
1257
27%
1481
50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
8.5
4.64
45%
1.1
87%
1.26
85%
1.55
82%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
15.8
7.86
50%
2.58
84%
2.45
84%
2.59
84%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
11.8
5.6
53%
1.7
86%
1.5
87%
1.8
85%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.18 101%
2.212 99%
2.298 96%
2.194 100%
CCT
10757 60%
8002 81%
6557 99%
6658 98%
6316 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 343500 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 343500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 343500 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17761 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Galaxy A14 的色彩调节能力稍弱。0.47cd/m² 的黑色值是我们测试领域中最高的,而在灰度和色彩方面,偏差进一步加大。根据 Calman 2D 测量,sRGB 色彩空间覆盖率为 97.3%。

饱和度(模式:自然,色温:已调整;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(模式:自然,色温:已调整;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(模式:自然,色温:已调整;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(模式:自然,色温:已调整;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(模式:自然,色温:已调整;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(模式:自然,色温:已调整;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩(模式:自然,色温:已调整;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩(模式:自然,色温:已调整;目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
15.68 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.963 ms rise
↘ 10.72 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.32 ms rise
↘ 19.23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.6 ms).

Galaxy A14 显示屏的可视角度稳定性还不错。从不同角度都能看到内容,但从侧面观看时亮度会明显下降。该面板的最大亮度较低,这一点在室外也很明显。在阳光充足的环境下,你必须用手遮挡阳光,才能看清显示屏上的内容。

性能 -Galaxy A14 太逊了

该系统的性能是Galaxy A14 最大的局限之一。尽管 联发科 Helio G80Exynos 850处理器相比有了很大的提升,但系统运行速度仍然很慢。即使在关闭某些应用程序时,也会出现等待和动画卡顿。即使是要求不高的应用程序,打开应用程序也需要一些时间。

这一点在基准测试中也很明显,A14 的表现比Galaxy A13 好得多,但在大多数测试中仍明显落后于采用Snapdragon 680685Mediatek Helio G99 的对比设备。只有在 CrossMark 和 AIMark 测试中,Galaxy A14 才能超过其中一款对比设备。在安兔兔 v9 基准测试中,Galaxy A14 也总是屡试不爽。

虽然这款智能手机在日常操作中是可用的,但也伴随着持续的卡顿和等待时间。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=208, last 2 years)
918 Points +162%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
548 Points +57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
442 Points +26%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
378 Points +8%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (300 - 387, n=12)
357 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
350 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
155 Points -56%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=208, last 2 years)
3022 Points +127%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1924 Points +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1787 Points +34%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1573 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1334 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (790 - 1370, n=12)
1275 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
586 Points -56%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2531, n=44, last 2 years)
1279 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
477 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 6460, n=44, last 2 years)
3412 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1498 Points
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=145, last 2 years)
751166 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
337968 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
289659 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (204040 - 232228, n=5)
212027 Points
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
207780 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
134832 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=207, last 2 years)
11902 Points +108%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9587 Points +68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
9421 Points +65%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
6728 Points +18%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (5589 - 8120, n=10)
6354 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5720 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4966 Points -13%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=162, last 2 years)
845 Points +143%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
602 Points +73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
454 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
348 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (325 - 348, n=3)
340 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
327 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
254 Points -27%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=160, last 2 years)
5900 Points +165%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3050 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2737 Points +23%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2573 Points +16%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (2072 - 2400, n=8)
2243 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2226 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1594 Points -28%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=160, last 2 years)
9844 Points +93%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6637 Points +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
6155 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5739 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5104 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (4045 - 5452, n=8)
4853 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
3112 Points -39%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=160, last 2 years)
6414 Points +142%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3802 Points +43%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3483 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3254 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2650 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (2343 - 3101, n=8)
2643 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1744 Points -34%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=160, last 2 years)
14793 Points +717%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2744 Points +52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2334 Points +29%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2182 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1811 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1735 - 1818, n=8)
1790 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1237 Points -32%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=160, last 2 years)
1514 Points +51%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1250 Points +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1232 Points +23%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1002 - 1243, n=8)
1122 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1002 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
930 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
917 Points -8%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=146, last 2 years)
21632 Points +496%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9493 Points +162%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4445 Points +22%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (3400 - 3992, n=3)
3674 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3630 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=107, last 2 years)
17669 Points +2165%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
890 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
780 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (311 - 780, n=2)
546 Points -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
365 Points -53%

Galaxy A14 的图形处理性能与Mali G52 MP2的图形性能更好。基准测试结果显示,三星智能手机的性能与竞争对手处于同一水平。而 Poco M5则在某些 3D Mark 测量中名列第二。综观各项测试结果,Galaxy A14 超越了前代产品,与对比设备的性能水平相当。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
323 Points +81%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
178 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
141 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
122 Points -31%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
342 Points +91%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
179 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
139 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
135 Points -25%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
115 Points -36%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1155 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
716 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
634 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
509 Points -29%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
463 Points -35%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1205 Points +71%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
706 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
646 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
513 Points -27%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
457 Points -35%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2838 Points +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2589 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2511 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2410 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2177 Points -10%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2378 Points +109%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1343 Points +18%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1153 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1139 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
799 Points -30%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2467 Points +91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1545 Points +20%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1299 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1290 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
930 Points -28%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3727 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2694 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2676 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2674 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2054 Points -24%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2413 Points +105%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1436 Points +22%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1242 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1178 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
791 Points -33%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2618 Points +95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1558 Points +16%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1367 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1346 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
916 Points -32%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
54 fps +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
37 fps
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
36 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps -41%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps +56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps +10%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps -39%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps +64%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -5%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -36%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps +74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps -30%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps +8%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
13 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.2 fps -37%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps +7%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.4 fps -37%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps +58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.6 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.6 fps
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.4 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.1 fps -33%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.9 fps -1%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.8 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.1 fps -32%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps +83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps +13%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5.3 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.3 fps -31%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps +81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.2 fps -31%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1.4 fps -56%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps +87%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9.5 fps +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.2 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.3 fps -29%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10.1 fps +19%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.1 fps -28%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5.1 fps -40%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.5 fps +79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1.5 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps

浏览器基准测试也显示出类似的情况。Galaxy A14 在这方面没有表现出任何弱点,始终保持在测试区域的中心位置。在日常操作中,网上冲浪的性能并不明显。网页加载速度很快,滚动也很流畅。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=166, last 2 years)
108.5 Points +171%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
58.945 Points +47%
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)
46.877 Points +17%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
40.743 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
40.02 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (29 - 40, n=8)
34 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)
22.283 Points -44%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=150, last 2 years)
111.3 runs/min +248%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
50.9 runs/min +59%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
37.48 runs/min +17%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
32 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (21.8 - 32, n=8)
28.3 runs/min -12%
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chome 107)
24.09 runs/min -25%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chome 101)
16.73 runs/min -48%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=158, last 2 years)
101.3 Points +130%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
58 Points +32%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (44 - 45, n=2)
44.5 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
44 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)
39 Points -11%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=114, last 2 years)
137.1 Points +129%
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)
88 Points +47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
74 Points +23%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
60 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
60 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (43 - 60, n=7)
49.7 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)
39 Points -35%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years)
33643 Points +186%
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)
17228 Points +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
15695 Points +33%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
12386 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
11782 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (10432 - 12744, n=9)
11574 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)
5904 Points -50%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)
8326.9 ms * -149%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (3227 - 4076, n=8)
3513 ms * -5%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
3347 ms *
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
3183.3 ms * +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
2534.5 ms * +24%
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)
2213.3 ms * +34%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=166, last 2 years)
1544 ms * +54%

* ... smaller is better

另一方面,三星在存储方面也有一些偷工减料。Galaxy A14 的测试机仅提供 64 GB 的存储空间,其中 17.3 GB 的存储空间在交付时已被占用。但至少,A14 可以通过 microSD 卡扩展存储空间。

这里使用的存储是经济实惠的 eMMC 存储,这一点在分析读写速度时也很明显。与前代产品相比,我们发现 A14 的存储速度甚至略慢。但在对比设备上,差异就变得非常明显了。Moto G52Poco M5 ,以及Redmi Note 12 的结果,在读取大文件时速度要快三倍左右。

Samsung Galaxy A14 LTESamsung Galaxy A13 4GMotorola Moto G52Xiaomi Poco M5Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4GAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
32%
164%
317%
289%
-15%
409%
Sequential Read 256KB
298.69
308.5
3%
893.44
199%
976.4
227%
954.87
220%
Sequential Write 256KB
200.17
236.8
18%
503.56
152%
870.7
335%
709.51
254%
176.8 ?(40 - 274, n=201)
-12%
Random Read 4KB
55.9
104.4
87%
98.99
77%
247.6
343%
261.09
367%
Random Write 4KB
55.86
67.3
20%
182.92
227%
257.8
362%
231.57
315%

游戏 -Galaxy A14,帧速率低

尽管系统性能较低,但仍可以在Galaxy A14 上玩游戏。即使是要求更高的游戏,如《PUBG Mobile》也可以玩,但您可以选择的最高图形级别是高清。加载游戏并下载显卡和其他资源后,就可以流畅地玩游戏了。不过,通过GameBench的测量结果表明,帧速率较低。选择高清还是平衡设置几乎没有区别。

平均帧率分别为 17.6 和 18.5 FPS。在《死亡扳机 2》等较为简单的游戏中,帧率较高,但即使在这款游戏中也达不到稳定的帧率。此外,记录显示有时会出现一些明显的帧数下降,表现为卡顿。

死亡扳机 2》游戏印象
死亡扳机 2》游戏印象
PUBG 移动游戏印象
PUBG 移动游戏印象
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE; Dead Trigger 2; 1.9.1: Ø50 (1-61)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 2.7.0: Ø18.5 (4-25)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.7.0: Ø17.6 (12-25)

排放 - A14 热量低、声音好

温度 - 三星主要保持凉爽

在日常操作中,Galaxy A14 保持凉爽宜人,我们测得的温度为 28.9 °C(84 °F),低于同类产品的平均水平。如果给智能手机增加一些负载,例如玩游戏或运行其他要求较高的程序时,手机温度会明显升高,尤其是摄像头区域。

我们测得该区域的最高温度为 40.3 °C(104.5 °F)。压力测试表明,智能手机的性能在负载情况下几乎没有下降。虽然系统运行稳定,但看看其他竞争对手的情况就会发现,在这一性能级别中也可以做得更好。

Max. Load
 36.8 °C34.2 °C35.5 °C 
 37.6 °C35.1 °C33.5 °C 
 37.2 °C36.1 °C33.3 °C 
Maximum: 37.6 °C
Average: 35.5 °C
35.2 °C36.7 °C40.2 °C
34.7 °C34.7 °C40.3 °C
34.3 °C36 °C39.3 °C
Maximum: 40.3 °C
Average: 36.8 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.7 % +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +3%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 % +3%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.7 % +2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
96.4 %
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
96.4 % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % +3%
Xiaomi Poco M5
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.8 % +2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
97.2 % +2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
95.6 %
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
% -100%
01234567Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø0.84 (0.827-0.851)
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.05 (2.02-2.07)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.813 (0.807-0.816)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.29 (4.15-4.31)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.07 (3.06-3.08)
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.68-2.68)
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.44 (7.37-7.47)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.9 (3.89-3.91)

扬声器 - 三星中的单声道扬声器

尽管三星Galaxy A14 只配备了一个单声道扬声器,但其性能却非常稳定。在 90.7 分贝的音量下,扬声器的音量非常大,而音箱却没有任何振动。声音很均衡,尤其是中音的再现很线性,高音稍显突出,而低频甚至低音几乎完全没有,这在同类产品中很典型。

值得肯定的是,三星继续为其智能手机配备音频接口。信噪比为 78.78 dBFS。在测试中,连接蓝牙耳机也没有任何问题。A14 支持 SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC 和 SSC 等标准编解码器,但缺少 AptX HD、Adaptive、TWAS+ 和 LC3。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.938.52526.230.93129.430.54028.731.85036.640.5632235.88019.733.410017.936.212518.538.416017.742.220015.143.825015.545.631516.550.24001354.850013.459.563014.262.88001366.3100012.870.6125013.874.7160013.777.1200013.679.2250013.279.631501482400013.582.9500013.679.7630013.978.3800013.679.41000013.679.71250013.869.31600013.158.2SPL25.890.7N0.778.5median 13.7median 70.6Delta0.813.436.434.428.230.326.624.926.627.132.43122.521.71717.325.526.721.228.419.136.11541.514.746.513.752.111.359.914.760.816.269.516.574.114.374.112.167.411.654.411.159.913.666.721.469.524.872.82868.623.466.123.165.120.870.723.470.82258.733.581.31.549.7median 16.5median 65.14.49.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A14 LTEXiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - A14 电池容量大,但续航时间短

耗电量

遗憾的是,联发科 Helio G80 并没有以极低的功耗来弥补其性能低下的缺陷。尽管该系统芯片也并不耗电,但对比设备中的骁龙处理器却更加高效。这与三星的配置无关,而是与芯片的总体功耗有关,使用该 SoC 的所有设备的平均值就说明了这一点。

虽然负载情况下的功耗与对比设备相同,但正常运行时的功耗却相当高,平均为 2.31 瓦。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.13 / 0.36 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.89 / 2.31 / 2.34 Watt
Load midlight 4.11 / 6.46 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G52
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M5
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G80
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
14%
30%
9%
16%
-3%
-0%
Idle Minimum *
0.89
0.9
-1%
0.8
10%
0.9
-1%
0.8
10%
1.025 ?(0.37 - 1.6, n=8)
-15%
Idle Average *
2.31
1.6
31%
1.1
52%
1.3
44%
1
57%
2.04 ?(0.9 - 4.22, n=8)
12%
Idle Maximum *
2.34
2.1
10%
1.5
36%
1.9
19%
1.5
36%
2.35 ?(1.6 - 4.37, n=8)
-0%
Load Average *
4.11
3.6
12%
2.9
29%
4.6
-12%
4.8
-17%
4.18 ?(2.8 - 6.12, n=8)
-2%
Load Maximum *
6.46
5.3
18%
5
23%
6.8
-5%
6.7
-4%
6.95 ?(4.9 - 9.14, n=8)
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mediatek Helio G80; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.42 (1.21-7.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.51 (0.839-6.72)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mediatek Helio G80; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.33 (1.278-1.755)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.289 (0.996-1.847)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.21.41.61.92.12.42.62.83.13.33.53.844.24.5Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mediatek Helio G80; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.25 (3.04-4.71)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.82 (2.47-4.26)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mediatek Helio G80; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.33 (1.278-1.755)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.289 (0.996-1.847)

电池寿命

通过对耗电量的分析,我们还可以了解电池的使用寿命。在我们的测试中,由于基本耗电量较高,电池的最长使用时间仅为 19.5 小时。但在实际的网上冲浪测试中,Galaxy A14 的续航时间至少达到了近 15 个小时,接近竞争对手的水平。在满载情况下,三星Galaxy A14 的续航时间为 5 小时 48 分钟。

在日常操作中,智能手机的电池续航时间比预期的要好。这主要归功于 5000 毫安时的大容量电池和较低的待机功耗。只要不玩游戏,智能手机也可以使用一天半或两天再充电。

Galaxy A14 充电需要时间。由于智能手机没有附带充电器,我们尝试了几种不同的充电器,但充电时间并没有多大差别。如果智能手机电池完全耗尽,大约需要 2.5 个小时才能充满电。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
19h 30min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 114)
14h 56min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 24min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 48min
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G52
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M5
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
27%
37%
32%
9%
Reader / Idle
1170
2164
85%
2183
87%
2503
114%
1512
29%
H.264
1044
1054
1%
1274
22%
1087
4%
1402
34%
WiFi v1.3
896
864
-4%
1102
23%
916
2%
719
-20%
Load
348
437
26%
398
14%
368
6%
327
-6%

Pros

+ 良好的主摄像头
+ 音频端口
+ 通过 microSD 卡扩展存储
+ 软件更新

Cons

- 系统速度低
- 显示屏亮度低
- 存储速度慢

结论--A13 公路改善有限

测试三星Galaxy A14 4G。测试机由 NBB.com (Notebooksbilliger.de) 提供。
测试三星Galaxy A14 4G。测试机由 NBB.com (Notebooksbilliger.de) 提供。

对于三星Galaxy A13 的前身,我们对其高分辨率显示屏赞不绝口,却对其薄弱的处理器颇有微词。尽管三星终于在性能方面做出了一些改进,但Galaxy A14 的速度无论如何都不算快。缓慢的 eMMC 存储肯定也是导致系统速度缓慢的原因之一。

虽然该机的显示屏在同价位产品中还算不错,但摩托罗拉或红米等其他制造商的同价位智能手机都配备了 90 甚至 120 Hz 的 OLED 面板。此外,三星显示屏的亮度也不高。

另一方面,Galaxy A14 的主摄像头值得称赞。在光线良好的条件下,它能拍出漂亮的照片,只是清晰度可能会稍好一些。不过,超广角镜头和微距镜头更像是装饰品。同样值得称赞的是它的更新支持,包括两个大型Android 版本更新和四年的安全补丁。凭借这一点,三星在这个价位的产品中可谓独树一帜。此外,Galaxy A14 已经搭载了Android 13。

就价格而言,三星Galaxy A14 并不是一款糟糕的智能手机,但其他制造商提供的设备质量明显更高。

喜欢高刷新率 OLED 面板的用户可以选择摩托罗拉 Moto G52Redmi Note 12 4G 。这两款智能手机的性能也更高。Poco M5 的运算能力更强。如果一定要选择三星智能手机,5G 版的Galaxy A14 也值得考虑,因为它带来了更快的存储速度和更强大的 SoC。

价格和供应情况

美国三星在线商店只提供 5G 64 GB 版本,售价约为 200 美元。亚马逊也提供国际版Galaxy A14 4G版本,起价约 138 美元,128 GB版本约 145 美元。

Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE - 07/17/2023 v7
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 68%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
80%
Games Performance
15 / 64 → 23%
Application Performance
59 / 86 → 68%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
52%
Average
66%
76%
Smartphone - Weighted Average