Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 920

Samsung Xclipse 920

三星Xclipse 920 GPU是三星Exynos 2200 SoC中的一个集成显卡，用于基于Android的智能手机和平板电脑。它被引入Galaxy S21系列的一些型号中。该iGPU是第一个使用AMD的架构（RDNA 2，像Ryzen 6000芯片中的Radeon 660M）。目前来自Geekbench ML的信息指出有3个CU（=192个着色器）。

该性能略低于目前手机的高端iGPU，如Adreno 730（Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1）或苹果A15 GPU，但仍足以满足2022年的所有手机游戏。

Xclipse 920是在三星的现代4纳米EUV工艺中生产的（因为它集成在Exynos 2200中）。

Xclipse 900 Series

Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
CodenameRDNA 2
ArchitectureRDNA 2
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
Man. Technology4 nm
Date of Announcement18.01.2022
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
3589 Points (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
ARM Mali-T720
91.7 -99%
...
Qualcomm Adreno 720
10399 -19%
Apple A14 Bionic GPU
10821 -16%
ARM Mali-G710 MP7
10953 -15%
Qualcomm Adreno 732
11506 -10%
Qualcomm Adreno 660
11533 -10%
Apple A15 GPU 4-Core
11581 -10%
ARM Mali-G78 MP22
12079 -6%
ARM Mali-G78 MP24
12146 -5%
IMG DXT-48-1536
12615 -2%
Samsung Xclipse 920
12830
ARM Mali-G710 MP10
13503 5%
HiSilicon Maleoon 920
13754 7%
Qualcomm Adreno 725
14801 15%
ARM Mali-G715 MP7
15156 18%
Apple A15 GPU 5-Core
15185 18%
ARM Mali-G615 MP6
16881 32%
Qualcomm Adreno 730
17826 39%
Qualcomm Adreno 735
18081 41%
ARM Mali-G720 MP7
20018 56%
...
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12
36299 183%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
PowerVR GE8100
0.314 -99%
...
Samsung Xclipse 540
23.67 -20%
HiSilicon Maleoon 910
24.2 -18%
Qualcomm Adreno 720
25.75 -13%
HiSilicon Maleoon 920A
26 -12%
ARM Mali-G78 MP14
26.67 -10%
Qualcomm Adreno 660
26.81 -9%
ARM Mali-G78 MP20
27 -8%
ARM Mali-G610 MP6
27.71 -6%
ARM Mali-G76 MP16
28.5 -3%
Samsung Xclipse 920
29.5
ARM Mali-G710 MP7
30.2 2%
Apple A13 Bionic GPU
30.6 4%
HiSilicon Maleoon 920
30.86 5%
Apple A14 Bionic GPU
30.87 5%
ARM Mali-G78 MP22
31 5%
Qualcomm Adreno 725
34 15%
Qualcomm Adreno 722
35.5 20%
Apple A15 GPU 4-Core
35.88 22%
Apple A15 GPU 5-Core
39.23 33%
...
Apple M3 10-Core GPU
118.5 302%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
530 1697%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
402385 Points (28%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
136.6 fps (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
8042 points (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
8695 points (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910111213141516Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
59.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
59.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
58.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
30 103 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
39.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60
Call of Duty Mobile60
Genshin Impact59.559.358.2
Armajet67
PUBG Mobile4439.532
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1

2


1
2

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.35
log 13. 04:08:11

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 10 Mar 2026 11:04:42 +0100 +0.004s ... 0.004s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.015s ... 0.019s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.019s

#6 composed specs +0s ... 0.019s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.019s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0.014s ... 0.032s

#10 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.01s ... 0.042s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.144s ... 0.186s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.011s ... 0.198s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.015s ... 0.213s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.016s ... 0.229s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.283s ... 0.513s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.513s

#18 Got 14 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.517s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.517s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.519s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.039s ... 0.558s

#22 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.124s ... 0.682s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.682s

Notebook reviews with Samsung Xclipse 920 graphics card

(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

三星Galaxy S23 FE 评测--作为粉丝服务的智能手机

时隔一年之后，三星通过Galaxy S23 FE 重新推出了其粉丝版。在我们的测试中，你会发现它到底能给你带来多少 "粉丝服务"，还是仅仅挤进了中端和高端之间。
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 6.4", 209 g
三星Galaxy S22+智能手机评论。Galaxy S22的大版本

三星Galaxy S22+智能手机评论。Galaxy S22的大版本

产品名称中的加号（+）意味着额外的功能，而三星Galaxy S22+提供了所需的功能。它提供了区别于著名的Galaxy S22的所有功能，但更进一步，特别是在显示屏和电池方面。
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 6.6", 196 g
三星Galaxy S22评论 - 最好的紧凑型Android 智能手机之一

三星Galaxy S22评论 - 最好的紧凑型Android 智能手机之一

6.1英寸的三星Galaxy S22是新Galaxy S系列中最小和最实惠的型号。即便如此，它也提供了与其更昂贵的同事相同的高SoC性能，并且在功能方面几乎不相上下。此外，与它的前辈Galaxy S21相比，它有很大的改进。
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 6.1", 167 g
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G评论 - 两款智能手机的融合体

三星Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G评论 - 两款智能手机的融合体

通过Galaxy S22 Ultra，三星结合了S系列和Note系列的顶级机型。这款智能手机在所有领域都使用了高端组件，并在超凡脱俗方面大做文章。在我们的测试中，找出这种组合是否成功，以及可能存在一些问题的地方。
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 6.8", 228 g

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

Samsung Galaxy S22+: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G Exynos

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Exynos

Samsung Galaxy S22: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy S22 5G Exynos

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.40", 0.2 kg
   » 三星Galaxy S24 FE 价格泄露预告美国售价接近旗舰机

   » 最新泄露的三星Galaxy S24 FE 细节曝光

Samsung Galaxy S22: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.10", 0.2 kg
   » 三星首席执行官：Galaxy S22 系列也可能获得Galaxy AI 功能

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » 三星首席执行官：Galaxy S22 系列也可能获得Galaxy AI 功能

Samsung Galaxy S22+: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.60", 0.2 kg
   » 三星首席执行官：Galaxy S22 系列也可能获得Galaxy AI 功能

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G: Samsung Exynos 2200, 6.80", 0.2 kg
   » 三星Galaxy S22、Galaxy S22 Plus 和Galaxy S22 Ultra 开始接受Android 14 与 One UI 6 的更新

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Adreno 825 *
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU *
A19 GPU *
A19 Pro 5-Core GPU *
A18 Pro GPU *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
DXT-48-1536 *
A18 GPU *
UHD Graphics 730
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC16 *
Immortalis-G925 MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC11 *
Adreno 750 *
Xclipse 950 *
Xclipse 940 *
Adreno 740 *
Immortalis-G720 MP12 *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
A19 4-Core GPU *
Adreno 725 *
Adreno 722 *
Mali-G720 MP8 *
Mali-G720 MP7 *
Adreno 735 *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
A16 GPU 4-Core *
Adreno 732 *
Adreno 730 *
Mali-G715 MP7 *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
Adreno 720 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Maleoon 920 *
Maleoon 920A *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Class 4

A10 Fusion GPU
Mali-G77 MP11 *
Xclipse 540
Xclipse 530
Mali-G77 MP9 *
Mali-G76 MP16 *
Mali-G610 MP6 *
Mali-G610 MP4 *
Adreno 810 *
Maleoon 920c *
Adreno 644 *
Adreno 643 *
Adreno 642 *
Mali-G610 MP3 *
Mali-G615 MP2 *
Adreno 642L *
Adreno 710 *
Adreno 640 *
Maleoon 910 *
Mali-G76 MP12 *
Mali-G76 MP10 *
Mali-G68 MP5 *
Mali-G57 MP6 *
Mali-G57 MP5 *
Adreno 540 *
Mali-G72 MP18 *
Mali-G71 MP20 *
Mali-G72 MP12 *
Mali-G71 MP8
PowerVR GM9446
Adreno 530
PowerVR GXA6850
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600
Mali-T880 MP12
Mali-G76 MP4 *
Mali-T760 MP8
Mali-G71 MP2 *
Adreno 430
Mali-G72 MP3 *
VideoCore VII *
Mali-G68 MP4 *
Mali-T880 MP4
Mali-G52 MP6 *
Mali-G68 MP2 *
Mali-G52 MP2 *
Mali-G52 MP1 *
Mali-T760 MP6
Mali-T880 MP2
PowerVR GX6450
Adreno 420
Adreno 620 *
IMG BXM-8-256
Mali-G57 MP4 *
Mali-G57 MP3 *

Class 5

Adreno 418
Adreno 619 *
Adreno 619L *
Adreno 618 *
Mali-G57 MP2 *
Mali-G57 MP1 *
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1
Adreno 616 *
Mali-G51 MP4 *
Adreno 613 *
Adreno 612 *
Adreno 610 *
Adreno 512 *
Adreno 510 *
Adreno 330
PowerVR G6430
PowerVR GX6250
PowerVR G6400
Mali-T628 MP6
Mali-T760 MP4
SGX554MP4
Mali-T628 MP4
Adreno 509 *
Adreno 508 *
Adreno 506 *
GE8322 / IMG8322 *
Adreno 505 *
Adreno 504 *
Mali-T860 MP2
Mali-T830 MP3
Mali-T604 MP4
PowerVR G6200
Adreno 405 *
Mali-T830 MP2

Class 6

SGX543MP4 *
Mali-T624
Adreno 320 *
Mali-T760 MP2
PowerVR GE8320 *
PowerVR GE8300 *
PowerVR GE8100 *
Mali-T720 MP4
Mali-450 MP4
Mali-T830 MP1
SGX543MP3 *
SGX543MP2 *
SGX545
SGX544MP2 *
Mali-T720 MP2
SGX544 *
Adreno 308
Adreno 306
Adreno 305
Adreno 304
Mali-T720
GC7000UL
Adreno 302
Adreno 225 *
GC4000 *
Mali-400 MP4 *
VideoCore-IV *
Adreno 220 *
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Mali-400 MP2 *
Mali-400 MP *
SGX540 *
Adreno 205 *
Adreno 203 *
GC800 *
GC Nano Ultra *
SGX535
SGX531
SGX530
Adreno 200 *
Mali-200 *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter