Notebookcheck Logo

realme C25Y智能手机评测 - 廉价的快速充电手机,有温度问题

强大的处理器,无力的冷却。 realme C25Y作为一款低成本的智能手机仍然相当陌生,但它以快速充电技术和大量的计算能力吸引了人们的注意。然而,在测试中长时间负载后的温度测量中,我们经历了一个令人不快的惊喜。
Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone
realme C25Y
realme C25Y (C Series)
Processor
UNISOC T610 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD up to 128 GB, dedicated, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.1 x 164.5 x 76
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 18 Watt fast charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0, Videos @720p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker on the back, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.952W/​kg (head), 1.239W/​kg (body) , fanless
Weight
200 g
Price
170 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
75.1 %
01/2022
realme C25Y
T610, Mali-G52 MP2
200 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
74.9 %
12/2021
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1
205 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
78.4 %
12/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
190 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.30"2340x1080
76.4 %
09/2021
Nokia G20
Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320
197 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720

箱子和设备 - 花很少的钱买很多的内存

realme主要以其中上等的智能手机而闻名,想用很少的钱与其他厂商的旗舰手机竞争。然而,realme也通过其C系列为非常小的预算提供预算手机。今天,我们来看看realme C25Y,它想用快速充电技术和高分辨率的摄像头来说服人们,但价格却大大低于200欧元(约227美元)。

realme C25Y有两种配置。

  • realme C25Y配备64GB大容量存储和4GB内存:160欧元(约181美元)
  • realme C25Y与128GB大容量存储和4GB内存:170欧元(约合人民币193元)。

我们的测试设备配备了较大的存储配置,以及颜色变体冰川蓝,一种带有颜色渐变的浅蓝色。也有一个名为金属灰的深灰色变体。

外壳由塑料背板制成,质地细腻,巧妙地增强了这种廉价材料的触觉效果。正面甚至允许中等压力到达屏幕,在那里可以看到液晶,但该设备在其他方面制造得很干净。显示屏保护膜是在出厂前就贴好的。

6.5英寸的屏幕和200克(约7盎司)的重量,该智能手机完全符合这个价格范围内的等级标准。

在功能方面,我们不得不批评缺乏NFC。此外,realme手机仍然使用micro-USB接口,这也是即将被淘汰的时候了。

microSD读卡器与两个SIM卡插槽分开安装,因此可以同时使用。在使用我们参考的microSD Angelbird V60进行数据传输时,该智能手机达到了其价格范围的平均速率。

realme C25Y
realme C25Y
realme C25Y
realme C25Y
realme C25Y
realme C25Y
realme C25Y
realme C25Y

Size comparison

164.9 mm 76 mm 9.2 mm 197 g164.5 mm 76 mm 9.1 mm 200 g164 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 205 g158.3 mm 75.3 mm 8.4 mm 190 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
  (Angelbird V60)
47.8 MB/s ∼100% +117%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.9 - 59.2, n=84, last 2 years)
26.4 MB/s ∼55% +20%
realme C25Y
  (Angelbird V60)
22 MB/s ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro)
15.71 MB/s ∼33% -29%
Nokia G20
  (Angelbird V60)
12.5 MB/s ∼26% -43%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
realme C25Y Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write: Ø22.5 (10.2-36.4)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write; Angelbird V60: Ø32.3 (23.2-38.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write; Toshiba Exceria Pro: Ø41.7 (32.2-56.9)
Nokia G20 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write: Ø31.1 (21-41.1)
realme C25Y Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read: Ø74.2 (39.4-79)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read; Angelbird V60: Ø50.2 (31.6-54.4)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read; Toshiba Exceria Pro: Ø84 (59.8-90.4)
Nokia G20 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read: Ø58.2 (14.6-62.3)

通信、软件和操作--对于价格范围来说是快速的

WiFi 4是realme C25Y支持的最快WLAN标准。至少在我们用参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12进行的测试中,该设备实现了约100MBit/s的体面传输率,而且数据率也保持相对稳定。该 Redmi Note 8 2021显示,有可能会更快,但我们的测试设备在同类比较中表现不俗。

realme UI是基于Android 11,安全补丁是在测试时从2021年9月开始的,因此已经过时了。这款智能手机肯定会被更新到Android 12或realme UI 3.0。

指纹传感器位于智能手机的背面,它也可以直接从待机状态下拾取realme C25Y,但延迟很小。识别精度很好,但就我们的口味而言,指纹识别器相当高,所以手小的人可能很难够到传感器。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
347 (338min - 353max) MBit/s ∼100% +250%
realme C25Y
802.11 b/g/n
99.2 (82min - 108max) MBit/s ∼29%
Nokia G20
802.11 b/g/n
47 (24min - 73max) MBit/s ∼14% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
802.11 b/g/n
42.9 (21min - 65max) MBit/s ∼12% -57%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
320 (290min - 330max) MBit/s ∼100% +217%
realme C25Y
802.11 b/g/n
101 (76min - 115max) MBit/s ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
802.11 b/g/n
50.4 (41min - 57max) MBit/s ∼16% -50%
Nokia G20
802.11 b/g/n
46.9 (27min - 66max) MBit/s ∼15% -54%
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø101.2 (76-115)
; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø99.2 (82-108)

照相机--细节上的锐度微弱

前置摄像头的录制
前置摄像头的录制

主摄像头是背面的5000万像素摄像头,在正常运行时将4个像素合二为一,从而创造出1200万像素的照片,完全可以满足绝大多数应用的需要,并且具有更高的感光性。然而,那些想使用全部像素的人也可以在特殊模式下拍摄5000万像素的照片。

室外的图像质量还不错,但在较大的区域你可以很清楚地看到像素伪影,这使绘图看起来不干净。动态范围还可以,但图像清晰度只能算一般。在低光照和高对比度的情况下,自动对焦功能很难创造出真正清晰的图像。

视频可以用最大的1080p和30帧录制,质量可以接受,但自动对焦有时会不堪重负。

除了主摄像头,还有2个摄像头,每个分辨率为200万像素。一个微距相机和一个支持模糊效果的镜头。

前面是一个800万像素的镜头,可以拍出体面的自拍,但你不应该把它们放大太多。然后图像的清晰度和细节精度会迅速下降。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera PlantMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
26.8 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
18 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
ColorChecker realme C25Y: 14.62 ∆E min: 4.17 - max: 26.84 ∆E
ColorChecker
29 ∆E
51.2 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
57.8 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
59.2 ∆E
60.8 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
69.9 ∆E
41 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
74 ∆E
67 ∆E
49.2 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker realme C25Y: 43.48 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 73.98 ∆E

显示 - realme C25Y的黑屏

子像素记录
子像素记录

realme C25Y采用720p的IPS屏幕。平均亮度不能与这个价格范围内的其他智能手机竞争,只够在阴天的户外使用。

由于黑值相当高,在高屏幕亮度下,黑暗区域看起来相当灰暗,但色彩再现的准确性达到了一流水平。

我们注意到在很低的屏幕亮度下有PWM闪烁,所以敏感的用户在购买智能手机之前应该先试一下,看看他们是否觉得有问题。

389
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 432 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 402.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.05 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 430 cd/m²
Contrast: 935:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.51 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
92.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.123
realme C25Y
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
IPS LCD, 2340x1080, 6.30
Nokia G20
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Response Times
-15%
29%
466560%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44 ?(25, 19)
58 ?(31, 27)
-32%
52 ?(27, 25)
-18%
44 ?(25, 19)
-0%
Response Time Black / White *
30 ?(17, 13)
34 ?(17, 17)
-13%
28 ?(13, 15)
7%
29 ?(16, 13)
3%
PWM Frequency
178.6 ?(10)
178.6 ?(7)
0%
352.1 ?(5)
97%
2500000
1399676%
Screen
11%
26%
-4%
Brightness middle
430
446
4%
496
15%
485
13%
Brightness
402
423
5%
491
22%
447
11%
Brightness Distribution
87
88
1%
91
5%
88
1%
Black Level *
0.46
0.29
37%
0.19
59%
0.44
4%
Contrast
935
1538
64%
2611
179%
1102
18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.51
4.94
-10%
5.5
-22%
5.75
-27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.79
8.81
-0%
8.88
-1%
10.53
-20%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.4
5.1
-16%
6.6
-50%
5.7
-30%
Gamma
2.123 104%
2.145 103%
2.36 93%
2.095 105%
CCT
7645 85%
7890 82%
8432 77%
8070 81%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / 4%
28% / 27%
233278% / 127241%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 65 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 178.6 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 178.6 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 178.6 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21792 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命--功率尚可,热量尚可

统一的T610有8个核心,性能高达2GHz。得益于此,该智能手机在其价格范围内实现了非常好的性能率,甚至是 小米Redmi Note 8在这里也无法跟上。你不应该期待高端动力,但realme C25Y不时感觉比其价格范围内的同事更顺畅一些。

另一方面,eMMC存储并不是速度的典范,它的低传输率反而拖慢了系统。

高的处理器功率似乎导致了冷却问题。我们在较长时间的负载后,在机箱上测量到了近50℃(122°F)的温度。这是令人不快的,而且在热天可能会变得更糟。很少在智能手机上玩游戏或运行类似的复杂应用程序的用户应该不会注意到这一点,但其他所有人都应该注意到负载下的热外壳。

扬声器位于智能手机的背面,紧挨着微型USB接口,这是很久以前的手机时代的另一个遗物。一个小隔板至少应能防止扬声器搁置在表面上并被覆盖。然而,当realme C25Y被放在柔软的表面上时,如床单,它并没有什么帮助。在声音方面,高音部分被极度强调,所以听音乐或电影原声带很难有乐趣。外部音频设备可以通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙连接。这样做效果很好,大大改善了声音。

在我们的电池测试中,这款手机持续了16个多小时,其中一个剧本通过WLAN上网。这是一个很好的价值,5,000毫安的大电池带来了回报。诺基亚 诺基亚G20持续的时间要长得多。Realme C25Y可以用18瓦特充电,因此通常在不到2小时内就能充满电池,而且很快就有足够的电量使用几个小时,这是非常好的。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
387 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
178 Points ∼27% -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
355 Points ∼53% -8%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
170 Points ∼25% -56%
Average UNISOC T610
  (345 - 387, n=3)
361 Points ∼54% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=255, last 2 years)
671 Points ∼100% +73%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1425 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1087 Points ∼50% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1336 Points ∼61% -6%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
607 Points ∼28% -57%
Average UNISOC T610
  (1034 - 1425, n=3)
1263 Points ∼58% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=255, last 2 years)
2195 Points ∼100% +54%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8504 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
5739 Points ∼56% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
7090 Points ∼69% -17%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5297 Points ∼52% -38%
Average UNISOC T610
  (7645 - 8504, n=2)
8075 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=146, last 2 years)
10218 Points ∼100% +20%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2243 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1273 Points ∼26% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1897 Points ∼38% -15%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
599 Points ∼12% -73%
Average UNISOC T610
  (1683 - 2243, n=2)
1963 Points ∼40% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13121, n=224, last 2 years)
4952 Points ∼100% +121%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2069 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1142 Points ∼16% -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1765 Points ∼25% -15%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
541 Points ∼8% -74%
Average UNISOC T610
  (1512 - 2069, n=2)
1791 Points ∼26% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=224, last 2 years)
6928 Points ∼100% +235%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3181 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2032 Points ∼63% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
2778 Points ∼86% -13%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
954 Points ∼29% -70%
Average UNISOC T610
  (2791 - 3181, n=2)
2986 Points ∼92% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=222, last 2 years)
3244 Points ∼100% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1515 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
863 Points ∼34% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1463 Points ∼58% -3%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
341 Points ∼13% -77%
Average UNISOC T610
  (1114 - 1515, n=2)
1315 Points ∼52% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=180, last 2 years)
2529 Points ∼100% +67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1326 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
738 Points ∼28% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1264 Points ∼48% -5%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
289 Points ∼11% -78%
Average UNISOC T610
  (955 - 1326, n=2)
1141 Points ∼43% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=180, last 2 years)
2628 Points ∼100% +98%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3023 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2031 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
2654 Points ∼88% -12%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
933 Points ∼31% -69%
Average UNISOC T610
  (2682 - 3023, n=2)
2853 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=180, last 2 years)
2857 Points ∼95% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1565 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
867 Points ∼22% -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1453 Points ∼36% -7%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
373 Points ∼9% -76%
Average UNISOC T610
  (1151 - 1565, n=2)
1358 Points ∼34% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11528, n=233, last 2 years)
4017 Points ∼100% +157%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1366 Points ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
736 Points ∼15% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1253 Points ∼25% -8%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
318 Points ∼6% -77%
Average UNISOC T610
  (986 - 1366, n=2)
1176 Points ∼23% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 19364, n=233, last 2 years)
5005 Points ∼100% +266%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3200 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2109 Points ∼65% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
2811 Points ∼87% -12%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
949 Points ∼29% -70%
Average UNISOC T610
  (2784 - 3200, n=2)
2992 Points ∼92% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=233, last 2 years)
3241 Points ∼100% +1%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
726 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
428 Points ∼13% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
721 Points ∼23% -1%
Average UNISOC T610
  (523 - 726, n=2)
625 Points ∼20% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=183, last 2 years)
3197 Points ∼100% +340%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
718 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
426 Points ∼13% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
717 Points ∼21% 0%
Average UNISOC T610
  (520 - 718, n=2)
619 Points ∼18% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=184, last 2 years)
3390 Points ∼100% +372%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
185 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
116 Points ∼12% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
186 Points ∼19% +1%
Average UNISOC T610
  (135 - 185, n=2)
160 Points ∼16% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3080, n=139, last 2 years)
994 Points ∼100% +437%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
182 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
117 Points ∼12% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
181 Points ∼19% -1%
Average UNISOC T610
  (132 - 182, n=2)
157 Points ∼16% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=135, last 2 years)
977 Points ∼100% +437%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
20 fps ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
11 fps ∼38% -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
8.5 fps ∼30% -57%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.6 fps ∼26% -62%
Average UNISOC T610
  (7.3 - 20, n=2)
13.7 fps ∼48% -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 98, n=250, last 2 years)
28.7 fps ∼100% +44%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
11 fps ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
6.2 fps ∼18% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
9.7 fps ∼29% -12%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.2 fps ∼12% -62%
Average UNISOC T610
  (7.8 - 11, n=2)
9.4 fps ∼28% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 123, n=251, last 2 years)
34 fps ∼100% +209%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12 fps ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
7 fps ∼35% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
5.5 fps ∼28% -54%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.8 fps ∼24% -60%
Average UNISOC T610
  (4.4 - 12, n=2)
8.2 fps ∼41% -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=251, last 2 years)
19.9 fps ∼100% +66%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
realme C25Y
UNISOC T610, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.7 fps ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2.2 fps ∼17% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
3.5 fps ∼27% -5%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.5 fps ∼12% -59%
Average UNISOC T610
  (2.7 - 3.7, n=2)
3.2 fps ∼25% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 47, n=251, last 2 years)
13 fps ∼100% +251%
realme C25YSamsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127FXiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021Nokia G20Average 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
43%
126%
11%
62%
380%
Sequential Read 256KB
258.1
302.3
17%
309.4
20%
256.1
-1%
282 ?(106.7 - 501, n=52)
9%
929 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=248, last 2 years)
260%
Sequential Write 256KB
163.7
74.5
-54%
159.7
-2%
139.3
-15%
191.9 ?(90 - 314, n=52)
17%
472 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=248, last 2 years)
188%
Random Read 4KB
84.3
77.8
-8%
73.6
-13%
63.5
-25%
81.2 ?(10.1 - 247, n=52)
-4%
166.5 ?(13.5 - 345, n=248, last 2 years)
98%
Random Write 4KB
14.9
47.21
217%
88.9
497%
27.4
84%
48.7 ?(5.3 - 159.9, n=52)
227%
159.7 ?(56.5 - 458, n=249, last 2 years)
972%

温度

Max. Load
 49.4 °C42.5 °C41.3 °C 
 47.7 °C42.9 °C42 °C 
 46.3 °C42.2 °C41.1 °C 
Maximum: 49.4 °C
Average: 43.9 °C
36.1 °C37.5 °C42.9 °C
37.6 °C38.6 °C43.5 °C
37.8 °C40.5 °C42.8 °C
Maximum: 43.5 °C
Average: 39.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.6 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.3 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图背面
热图背面

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204046.82532.436.53127.630.44029.933.45034.938.1632729.98017.82510014.224.412513.325.416010.2302008.834.22509.639.93157.343.34007.348.15009.257.263012.962.680017.368.2100012.973.4125010.972.916009.768.1200010.267.8250011.666.931501361.2400013.960.3500015.269.2630015.777.7800015.876.51000017.165.41250016.159.81600016.668.8SPL25.883N0.751.1median 12.9median 62.6Delta2.811.838.945.344.745.33436.736.836.742.640.637.333.826.225.928.327.622.422.218.933.41640.514.546.313.253.81359.116.565.119.566.219.66617.468.515.374.415.378.515.778.416.576.317.977.520.870.32267.220.974.121.772.722.870.32263.122.558.531.586.41.462.6median 18.9median 66.2311.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noiserealme C25YSamsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
realme C25Y audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

realme C25Y
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
4000 mAh
Nokia G20
5050 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
968
879
-9%
748
-23%
1186
23%
907 ?(438 - 1953, n=255, last 2 years)
-6%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 08min

Pros

+ 充足的内存
+ 快速的SoC
+ 电池运行时间长
+ 18瓦的快速充电

Cons

- 过时的微型USB接口
- 没有NFC
- 屏幕昏暗
- 过时的安全补丁
- 负载下的强烈发热
- 高音重的扬声器

结论 - realme手机中不及时的细节

评测中:Realme C25Y。测试设备由:
评测中:Realme C25Y。测试设备由:
笔记本billiger.com

在内存方面,realme C25Y在这个价格段几乎没有优势,但你必须没有NFC,不幸的是你也没有得到一个明亮的屏幕。PWM闪烁和高黑值进一步降低了屏幕的亮度,而扬声器的位置不利,声音极度偏重,也让人讨厌。

realme在其手机中安装了一个过时的微型USB接口,这很令人恼火。USB-C早已确立了自己的标准,并最终导致远离了连接和电缆的杂乱。你也不应该期望有太多的安全更新,而且在这个价格范围内,当涉及到相机时,有更清晰的传感器。此外,智能手机在长时间加载后会发热得很厉害。

realme C25Y值得推荐吗?嗯,高计算能力、快速充电和良好的运行时间绝对可以说服人。即使是那些想用小钱买大内存的人也会觉得物有所值。然而,我们上面提到的许多负面因素仍然使我们对整体推荐感到犹豫。

realme C25Y是一款便宜的手机,在同类产品中具有很强的计算能力,但也存在一些问题。

如果你还能应付较少的电池寿命,你可能要考虑 Redmi Note 8 2021它甚至有一个全高清屏幕。与 诺基亚G20你可以得到相当纯粹的Android 和一个广角摄像头,以及更多的耐力,但价格相近。

价格和可用性

realme C25Y有64或128GB的存储空间。在美国,你可以以大约200美元的价格拥有更高端的128GB机型:在亚马逊上购买国际版灰色.

realme C25Y - 01/19/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
39 / 70 → 56%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
81%
Games Performance
16 / 64 → 25%
Application Performance
62 / 86 → 72%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
40 / 90 → 44%
Camera
48%
Average
68%
75%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > realme C25Y智能手机评测 - 廉价的快速充电手机,有温度问题
Florian Schmitt, 2022-01-22 (Update: 2022-01-22)