Notebookcheck Logo

联想Tab M10 Plus 2022(第三代)评论。经济实惠的平板电脑,配有2K显示屏和手写笔支持

不到250欧元,不费吹灰之力? 由于其强大的功能和三年的更新政策,Tab M10 Plus有可能成为真正的畅销产品,但只有在价格下降的情况下。对于这样一款支持手写笔的低价平板电脑来说,这听起来可能很矛盾,但这是有原因的。
Android Tablet Touchscreen
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测

通过Tab M10 Plus第三代,联想以另一款廉价的多媒体平板电脑扩大了其Android ,价格从249欧元(约260美元)的建议零售价开始。第三代M10 Plus有四个扬声器和一个相对高分辨率的2K IPS面板,但它只提供60 Hz的刷新率。作为回报,该显示器可以与联想专有的手写笔一起使用,这在这个价格范围内很难找到。

A联发科Helio G80是Tab M10 Plus第三代的标准配置。根据型号的不同,联想为其配备了3至6GB的内存和32至128GB的闪存,可通过microSD存储卡扩展至1TB。还有一个LTE版本,但它不是基于Helio SoC,而是基于高通Snapdragon 680。这导致了除了4G接入之外的进一步差异,我们将在本评论中介绍。

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Tab M Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G80 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
10.61 inch 16:10, 2000 x 1200 pixel 220 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, IPS LCD, TDDI technology, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 49 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSDXC (up to 1 TB), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity sensor, acceleration sensor, position sensor, hall, OTG, miracast, FM radio
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.45 x 251.2 x 158.8
Battery
7500 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.2, 86.2° field of view, autofocus), Camera2 API: Full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0, 83° field of view, fixed focus)
Additional features
Speakers: quad-audio system, Keyboard: onscreen, charger, USB cable, Lenovo UI, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
465 g, Power Supply: 53 g
Price
249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82.5 %
07/2022
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
465 g7.45 mm10.61"2000x1200
84.1 %
11/2021
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4
490 g7.5 mm11.00"2000x1200
80.9 %
04/2022
Huawei MatePad T10S
Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4
450 g7.85 mm10.10"1920x1200
81 %
02/2022
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
T618, Mali-G52 MP2
508 g6.9 mm10.50"1920x1200
80.5 %
03/2022
Teclast T40 Pro
T618, Mali-G52 MP2
480 g9.2 mm10.36"2000x1200

保护壳 - 联想Tab M10 Plus的两种颜色

联想Tab M10 Plus的可用颜色
联想Tab M10 Plus的可用颜色

联想推出的这款经济实惠的中端平板电脑具有令人愉悦的感觉,屏占比达到了坚实的80.3%。与第二代产品相比,Tab M10 Plus第三代产品做了许多改进,首先是设计。2022年的机型四面的屏幕边框都是对称的,而且显示屏的边缘是弧形的。此外,这款联想平板电脑的厚度只有7.5毫米,非常纤薄,而且只有465克,对于一个10.6英寸的设备来说,它的重量令人愉快。

金属外壳有风暴灰和冰霜蓝的双色设计。与 笔记本P11 Plus,联想在背面的上半部分使用了一种磨砂表面,除了作为一个设计元素,对外壳的硬度没有重大影响外,还提供了良好的抓地力。下部是由哑光拉丝铝制成。金属外壳上被贴纸覆盖的区域真的很难清洁,而且会留下一些难看的残留物--制造商应该紧急在这里做出调整。

Tab P11系列,联想没有为其Tab M10 Plus第三代提供官方的IP认证。因此,这款平板电脑不应该在雨中使用。

联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测

尺寸比较

258.4 mm 163 mm 7.5 mm 490 g251.2 mm 158.8 mm 7.45 mm 465 g248 mm 157 mm 9.2 mm 480 g246.8 mm 161.9 mm 6.9 mm 508 g240.2 mm 159 mm 7.85 mm 450 g

连接性--联想平板电脑带有3.5毫米音频插孔

Tab M10 Plus第三代配备了eMCP或uMCP存储。这是由于 联发科Helio G80的缺乏与UFS标准的兼容性。在我们的Wi-Fi版联想平板电脑中,内部eMMC 5.1存储的容量为64GB。扣除操作系统后,仍有约49GB可用。需要更多容量的用户可以通过支持exFAT的microSD卡将存储空间扩大到1TB。由于exFAT文件格式,大于4GB的文件可以保存在存储介质上。选择LTE版本的用户还可以在卡槽中插入一个nano SIM。

Tab M10 Plus第三代的两个版本都有一个调频收音机,一个3.5毫米音频插孔,以及一个四扬声器系统。这款联想平板电脑还支持Wi-Fi Display和USB OTG。然后可以通过USB Type-C接口访问数据,比如播放视频资料。这需要一个相应的适配器,联想Tab不包括这个适配器。额外的外部设备,如外部键盘,也可以通过USB 2.0端口连接。

底部箱体侧面
底部箱体侧面
顶壳一侧(按钮、麦克风、读卡器)。
顶壳一侧(按钮、麦克风、读卡器)。
右侧外壳(3.5毫米音频插孔,扬声器,USB端口,扬声器)
右侧外壳(3.5毫米音频插孔,扬声器,USB端口,扬声器)
左侧外壳(扬声器、喇叭、按钮)
左侧外壳(扬声器、喇叭、按钮)

微型SD卡读卡器

内置的microSD插槽支持最新的SDHC和SDXC标准。结合我们的Angelbird AV PRO V60参考卡,在跨平台磁盘测试中的表现令人瞩目。然而,当涉及到复制速度时,Tab M10 Plus Gen 3的速度相当慢,只有16MB/s。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
49.18 MB/s ∼100% +205%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.4 MB/s ∼41% +27%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
18.12 MB/s ∼37% +12%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
17.9 MB/s ∼36% +11%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
16.11 MB/s ∼33%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø42 (31.2-52.8)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.7 (13.3-40.3)
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø70.5 (13.8-78.6)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (37.9-86.8)

软件 - 联想Tab M10 Plus与Android 12

这款联想平板电脑基于Android 12,联想将其与自己的用户界面相结合。在测试时,安全更新处于2022年5月的水平,因此相当符合最新情况。根据制造商的更新矩阵,Tab M10 Plus第三代将提供安全补丁的软件支持,直到2025年4月。然而,联想并没有说明后续的主要Android 更新的数量。 Android 13预计将在明年向M系列平板电脑推出。

该软件基于股票Android ,包括很少的臃肿软件和多个用户的账户管理。此外,Tab M10 Plus第三代提供了对谷歌娱乐空间以及谷歌儿童空间的访问。通过Family Link应用程序的家长控制,可以管理可用的内容并设置屏幕时间限制。由于通过了DRM-L1认证,你可以在10.6英寸显示屏上以高分辨率播放内容。

联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测

通信和GNSS--联想平板电脑带Wi-Fi 5

我们的评测样品是Tab M10 Plus第三代的Wi-Fi版本,它配备了Wi-Fi 5和蓝牙5.0。配备高通骁龙X11调制解调器的4G版本也支持LTE CAT13和蓝牙5.1。这两款平板电脑型号都不可能通过NFC进行非接触式支付。与华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000结合使用,联想Tab的峰值传输率约为350Mb/s,令人满意,但不是特别快。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (327min - 349max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
352 (334min - 359max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
347 (335min - 351max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
325 (163min - 328max) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
322 (315min - 326max) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
203 (158min - 227max) MBit/s ∼59% -41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
349 (178min - 357max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
346 (335min - 360max) MBit/s ∼99% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
346 (167min - 354max) MBit/s ∼99%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
239 (202min - 259max) MBit/s ∼68% -31%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø346 (335-351)
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø341 (167-354)
在室内定位
在室内定位
在户外定位
在户外定位

Tab M10 Plus第三代的Wi-Fi版本也适合用于导航,因为它可以通过GPS(L1)、伽利略(E1)、北斗和格洛纳斯卫星系统确定当前位置。为了做一个比较,我们用Garmin Venu 2追踪了一条路线。Garmin Venu 2并行跟踪了一条路线。

在实践中,定位精度是非常稳固的。然而,在我们的路线资料中,选择的路线和Garmin智能手表有一些偏差。寻找用于汽车旅行的巨大导航设备的用户可以通过包含A-GPS的4G版本取得更好的效果。

联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus vs. Garmin Venu 2
联想Tab M10 Plus vs. Garmin Venu 2
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测

摄像头 - 联想Tab M10 Plus配备单摄像头

联想Tab M10 Plus的人像模式
联想Tab M10 Plus的人像模式
用联想Tab M10 Plus拍摄的自拍照
用联想Tab M10 Plus拍摄的自拍照

然而,除了视频通话之外,你不应该对位于显示屏上方的前置摄像头抱有太大期望,因为自拍相当柔和,而且曝光经常不正常--特别是在拍摄人像时。由于分辨率相对较低,图片的细节再现并不是这款廉价中档平板电脑的优势之一。

后置的800万像素摄像头没有LED闪光灯,由于其自动对焦功能,保证了更好的图像清晰度,但它更适合在日常使用中拍摄文件和备忘录。照片中心的基本清晰度仍然很好,但细节在接近边缘的地方会变得模糊不清。我们也不总是对颜色留下深刻印象。800万像素摄像头的照片有时会出现明显的红色偏移。

虽然两个摄像头的分辨率相同,但后置镜头可以录制1080p和30fps的视频,而自拍摄像头只有高清选项。

变焦6倍(最大)
广角
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Subject 1Subject 2Low lightZoom 5x
click to load images

我们在受控的光线条件下对后置主摄像头进行进一步测试。通过ColorChecker Passport,我们分析了800万像素镜头的色彩再现与实际参考色彩的对比。我们在完整的演播室灯光下和1勒克斯的灯光强度下各测量一次。Tab M10 Plus的色彩还原得相当好,而且偏差不会导致平板电脑的任何真正缺陷。与参考颜色相比,可以看到典型的增亮。

ColorChecker
10.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3: 8.59 ∆E min: 2.25 - max: 14.22 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
40.4 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
65.7 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
49.2 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
53 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3: 47.62 ∆E min: 13.99 - max: 93.71 ∆E

附件和保修 - 联想平板电脑与充电器

联想Tab M10 Plus的电源适配器
联想Tab M10 Plus的电源适配器

这款中档平板电脑配备了一个10瓦的模块化电源适配器和一条USB线。联想还为Tab M10 Plus第三代提供了一个可选的20瓦电源适配器。兼容的联想Precision Pen 2有4096个压力级别,单独出售,价格约为50欧元(约52美元)。带有键盘和触控板的键盘包并不适用于价格低廉的Tab M型号。

在德国,联想提供24个月的 保修为其平板电脑提供24个月的保修。你还可以将保修期延长至最长三年,并购买联想意外损坏保护(约155欧元(约162美元))。后者涵盖了因跌落或溢出液体等事故造成的操作和结构性损坏。

输入设备和处理 - 联想Tab M10 Plus支持手写笔

Tab M10 Plus第3代具有一个10点多点触摸功能的屏幕。在10.6英寸的IPS面板上,用手指的输入可以快速实现。由于60赫兹的原因,动画看起来不如90赫兹或更高频率的显示器那么流畅。但是,不仅内容的呈现受到低刷新率的 "影响",而且打字和绘画的体验也受到影响。联想宣传Tab M10 Plus第三代与Precision Pen 2手写笔兼容,但规格表中也提到了联想Active Pen 3。由于我们的评测样本中没有这两种笔,我们无法检查这款经济型联想Tab的手写笔输入性能。

不幸的是,Tab M10 Plus第三代没有指纹传感器。然而,通过生物面部识别解锁工作可靠,在光线良好的情况下通常足够快。然而,2D方法只适用于前置摄像头,使面部识别相当不安全。

联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测

显示屏 - 联想Tab的IPS面板

子像素网格
子像素网格

这款中档平板电脑的对角线尺寸为10.6英寸,格式为16:10。这块大约27厘米的IPS显示屏的分辨率略高于全高清,为2,000x1,200像素,这导致像素密度为220 ppi;这不是很高,但已经足够。在白色背景下,联想平板电脑的最大亮度达到了516cd/m²。更现实的APL18测量结果显示了类似的490cd/m²。

Tab M10 Plus Gen 3没有利用传统的PWM进行亮度控制,但它确实表现出高频闪烁。

440
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
510
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
510
cd/m²
516
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 516 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 480 cd/m² Minimum: 4.32 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 510 cd/m²
Contrast: 1041:1 (Black: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
95.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 10.61
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
IPS, 2000x1200, 11.00
Huawei MatePad T10S
LCD IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.50
Teclast T40 Pro
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.36
Screen
-48%
-48%
-107%
-38%
Brightness middle
510
410
-20%
285
-44%
368
-28%
433
-15%
Brightness
480
400
-17%
282
-41%
346
-28%
412
-14%
Brightness Distribution
85
83
-2%
91
7%
91
7%
86
1%
Black Level *
0.49
0.29
41%
0.3
39%
0.61
-24%
0.48
2%
Contrast
1041
1414
36%
950
-9%
603
-42%
902
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.8
4.47
-148%
3.53
-96%
6.9
-283%
3
-67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.7
8.84
-139%
5.84
-58%
11.4
-208%
7.2
-95%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
5.1
-132%
6.2
-182%
7.7
-250%
4.4
-100%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.248 98%
2.044 108%
2.16 102%
2.12 104%
CCT
6907 94%
7966 82%
8130 80%
8547 76%
7003 93%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 32730 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 32730 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 32730 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19590 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
闵行区。
25%的亮度
25%
50%的亮度
50%
75%的亮度
75%
最大手动亮度
100%

用固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置进行一系列的测量

这款中端平板电脑的黑度为0.49cd/m²,对于IPS面板来说只能算得上体面,但良好的亮度仍然确保了超过1:1,000的高对比度显示。此外,我们使用分光光度计和CalMAN软件的分析显示,与sRGB色彩空间相比,平均deltaE偏差相对较低。除了两个颜色配置文件,色温也可以在设置菜单中调整。关于颜色,在红色的情况下,与目标有明显的偏差,但这在日常使用中不会有什么影响。

色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准,暖色)。
色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准,暖色)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准,温暖)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准,温暖)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准,暖色)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准,暖色)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准,暖色)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准,暖色)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
15.81 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.34 ms rise
↘ 10.47 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34.52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.95 ms rise
↘ 18.57 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (35.9 ms).

坚实的对比度与IPS面板的良好亮度相结合,在户外提供了足够的可读性--但不应该是太阳光下。内容在阳光直射下并不真正可读--即使没有反射,面板也达到了它的极限。

由于采用了平面内切换技术(IPS)的液晶显示器,即使在平坦的视角下,也能相对准确地呈现内容的色彩。然而,从侧面看该设备时,可以感觉到亮度的损失。

联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测

性能 - 采用联发科SoC的联想平板电脑

非LTE的Tab M10 Plus第三代配备了一个联发科Helio G80它是在12纳米FinFET工艺下制造的。该芯片组有两个集群的8个CPU核心(Cortex-A75,Cortex-A55),并集成了一个ARM Mali-G52 MP2运行频率高达950 MHz。

这款中档平板电脑在日常使用中给人留下了不错的印象,但我们在测试期间确实遇到了一些卡顿。此外,Tab M10 Plus Gen 3从其内存中快速释放已打开的应用程序,尽管它的4GB容量实际上是足够的。然而,M10型号并没有表现出像Tab P11 Plus那样粗糙的性能缺陷。 笔记本P11 Plus;与去年相比,联想似乎在Android 12端口方面总体上做得更好。

这款低价的中端平板电脑在我们的CPU基准测试包中表现稳健,但Tab M10 Plus第三代不能接近于Helio G90T在其兄弟姐妹Tab P11 Plus中的表现。Helio G80倾向于在我们的比较设备中排名较低的中场。PCMark的系统基准测试也是如此,它比Tab P11 Plus低30%左右。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (133 - 1892, n=42, last 2 years)
750 Points ∼32% +119%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
503 Points ∼22% +47%
Teclast T40 Pro
380 Points ∼16% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
365 Points ∼16% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (300 - 387, n=10)
360 Points ∼16% +5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
343 Points ∼15%
Huawei MatePad T10S
296 Points ∼13% -14%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (455 - 8524, n=42, last 2 years)
2678 Points ∼9% +115%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
1557 Points ∼5% +25%
Teclast T40 Pro
1303 Points ∼5% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (790 - 1370, n=10)
1273 Points ∼4% +2%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1256 Points ∼4% +1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
1247 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1229 Points ∼4% -1%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (117837 - 1416727, n=31, last 2 years)
556608 Points ∼39% +163%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
322048 Points ∼23% +52%
Teclast T40 Pro
240502 Points ∼17% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (204040 - 232228, n=4)
213058 Points ∼15% +1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
211417 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
201310 Points ∼14% -5%
Huawei MatePad T10S
182567 Points ∼13% -14%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (4564 - 13996, n=28, last 2 years)
8877 Points ∼46% +35%
Teclast T40 Pro
8364 Points ∼44% +27%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
8346 Points ∼43% +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7447 Points ∼39% +13%
Huawei MatePad T10S
6622 Points ∼34% +1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
6583 Points ∼34%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (5589 - 8120, n=8)
6389 Points ∼33% -3%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (361 - 1585, n=20, last 2 years)
831 Points ∼32%
Teclast T40 Pro
384 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
361 Points ∼14%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
325 Points ∼13%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (806 - 6908, n=28, last 2 years)
3463 Points ∼40% +62%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
2948 Points ∼34% +38%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (2134 - 2400, n=6)
2274 Points ∼26% +7%
Teclast T40 Pro
2145 Points ∼25% +1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
2134 Points ∼24%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2013 Points ∼23% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1839 Points ∼21% -14%
System
Average of class Tablet (1492 - 10926, n=28, last 2 years)
6211 Points ∼32% +50%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (4133 - 5452, n=6)
4946 Points ∼25% +20%
Teclast T40 Pro
4863 Points ∼25% +18%
Huawei MatePad T10S
4845 Points ∼25% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
4729 Points ∼24% +14%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
4273 Points ∼22% +3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
4133 Points ∼21%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (675 - 8167, n=28, last 2 years)
3849 Points ∼33% +58%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3632 Points ∼31% +49%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2896 Points ∼25% +19%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (2436 - 3101, n=6)
2692 Points ∼23% +11%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
2436 Points ∼21%
Teclast T40 Pro
1608 Points ∼14% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
970 Points ∼8% -60%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (542 - 22308, n=28, last 2 years)
6244 Points ∼22% +250%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3647 Points ∼13% +104%
Teclast T40 Pro
2063 Points ∼7% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2001 Points ∼7% +12%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
1786 Points ∼6%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1735 - 1811, n=6)
1782 Points ∼6% 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1452 Points ∼5% -19%
Web
Teclast T40 Pro
1313 Points ∼55% +11%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
1273 Points ∼53% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1246 Points ∼52% +5%
Average of class Tablet (772 - 1598, n=28, last 2 years)
1246 Points ∼52% +5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
1186 Points ∼50%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (1077 - 1243, n=6)
1151 Points ∼48% -3%
Huawei MatePad T10S
956 Points ∼40% -19%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Tablet (4281 - 119686, n=26, last 2 years)
27378 Points ∼10% +299%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
13053 Points ∼5% +90%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (6865 - 7292, n=4)
7077 Points ∼2% +3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
6865 Points ∼2%
Teclast T40 Pro
4695 Points ∼2% -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
4659 Points ∼2% -32%
Huawei MatePad T10S
4455 Points ∼2% -35%
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score
Average of class Tablet (1535 - 73266, n=14, last 2 years)
10519 Points ∼12%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
5938 Points ∼7%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
3400 Points ∼4%

Legend

 
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mediatek Helio G80, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mediatek Helio G90T, ARM Mali-G76 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei MatePad T10S HiSilicon Kirin 710A, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Teclast T40 Pro UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

当涉及到图形密集型基准测试时,Mali-G52 MP2的性能是最好的。芯片的表现甚至比 绩效更差的是Mali-G76中的表现更差。Tab P11 Plus.在3DMark的Wild Life中,两款联想平板电脑之间的差距有时达到100%。同样地,只有MatePad T10s在GFX基准测试中,只有MatePad T10s的得分比Tab M10 Plus第三代差。总的来说, Galaxy Tab A8也配备了Mali-G52 MP2,略微领先于联想Tab。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
381 Points ∼100% +123%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points ∼47% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
179 Points ∼47% +5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
171 Points ∼45%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
152 Points ∼40% -11%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
380 Points ∼100% +116%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
184 Points ∼48% +5%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
182 Points ∼48% +3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
176 Points ∼46%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
153 Points ∼40% -13%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1387 Points ∼100% +101%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
709 Points ∼51% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
708 Points ∼51% +2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
691 Points ∼50%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
564 Points ∼41% -18%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1344 Points ∼100% +96%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
712 Points ∼53% +4%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
709 Points ∼53% +3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
687 Points ∼51%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
557 Points ∼41% -19%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3128 Points ∼100% +75%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2158 Points ∼69% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2105 Points ∼67% +18%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1787 Points ∼57%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1501 Points ∼48% -16%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3057 Points ∼100% +83%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2002 Points ∼65% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1957 Points ∼64% +17%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1675 Points ∼55%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1356 Points ∼44% -19%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3438 Points ∼100% +23%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2969 Points ∼86% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2862 Points ∼83% +3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2787 Points ∼81%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2441 Points ∼71% -12%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2694 Points ∼100% +99%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1526 Points ∼57% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1463 Points ∼54% +8%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1355 Points ∼50%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1124 Points ∼42% -17%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2473 Points ∼100% +32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1875 Points ∼76%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1338 Points ∼54% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1284 Points ∼52% -32%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
981 Points ∼40% -48%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3375 Points ∼100% +32%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3007 Points ∼89% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2865 Points ∼85% +12%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2564 Points ∼76%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2365 Points ∼70% -8%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2684 Points ∼100% +97%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1518 Points ∼57% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1488 Points ∼55% +9%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1364 Points ∼51%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1059 Points ∼39% -22%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2603 Points ∼100% +117%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1361 Points ∼52% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1340 Points ∼51% +12%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1197 Points ∼46%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
954 Points ∼37% -20%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2774 Points ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2698 Points ∼97%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2541 Points ∼92% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2422 Points ∼87% -10%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
230 Points ∼8% -91%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2483 Points ∼100% +79%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1456 Points ∼59% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1425 Points ∼57% +3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1384 Points ∼56%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1085 Points ∼44% -22%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2374 Points ∼100% +101%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1281 Points ∼54% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1252 Points ∼53% +6%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1182 Points ∼50%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
955 Points ∼40% -19%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3183 Points ∼100% +23%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2783 Points ∼87% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2768 Points ∼87% +7%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2587 Points ∼81%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2236 Points ∼70% -14%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3374 Points ∼100% +90%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2140 Points ∼63% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2084 Points ∼62% +17%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1777 Points ∼53%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1445 Points ∼43% -19%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3472 Points ∼100% +113%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1998 Points ∼58% +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1958 Points ∼56% +20%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1628 Points ∼47%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1333 Points ∼38% -18%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3283 Points ∼100% +30%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2850 Points ∼87% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2692 Points ∼82% +6%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2528 Points ∼77%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2256 Points ∼69% -11%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
58 fps ∼100% +49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps ∼67% 0%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps ∼67% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps ∼67%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
38 fps ∼66% -3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
78 fps ∼100% +77%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44 fps ∼56%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps ∼53% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps ∼53% -7%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps ∼53% -7%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
43 fps ∼100% +105%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps ∼58% +19%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps ∼58% +19%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps ∼49%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
20 fps ∼47% -5%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
48 fps ∼100% +100%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps ∼58% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps ∼54% +8%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps ∼54% +8%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps ∼50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps ∼100% +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps ∼58% +15%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps ∼58% +15%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps ∼54% +8%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps ∼50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29 fps ∼100% +107%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps ∼55% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps ∼52% +7%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps ∼52% +7%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps ∼48%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps ∼100% +93%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.2 fps ∼58% +11%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps ∼53% +2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.3 fps ∼52%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps ∼51% -2%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18 fps ∼100% +96%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.7 fps ∼54% +5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.2 fps ∼51%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.1 fps ∼51% -1%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps ∼48% -5%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps ∼100% +92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps ∼60% +15%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps ∼60% +15%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.2 fps ∼52%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.8 fps ∼48% -8%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6.7 fps ∼100% +109%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.6 fps ∼54% +13%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.6 fps ∼54% +13%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps ∼48%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.9 fps ∼43% -9%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps ∼100% +113%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.9 fps ∼58% +24%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.9 fps ∼58% +24%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8 fps ∼47%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.6 fps ∼45% -5%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
19 fps ∼100% +118%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps ∼53% +15%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps ∼53% +15%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps ∼46%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.3 fps ∼23% -51%

浏览器测试显示了与CPU和GPU基准测试相似的情况。Tab M10 Plus第三代的表现比Tab A8略差。 Galaxy Tab A8.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (15 - 225, n=36, last 2 years)
85.5 Points ∼100% +160%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
43.98 Points ∼51% +34%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)
35.48 Points ∼41% +8%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
32.868 Points ∼38%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (29 - 35.3, n=6)
32.2 Points ∼38% -2%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
30.25 Points ∼35% -8%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (22.1 - 436, n=33, last 2 years)
146.6 Points ∼100% +156%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
75.3 Points ∼51% +31%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)
70.6 Points ∼48% +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
66.5 Points ∼45% +16%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
57.32 Points ∼39%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (54 - 60.8, n=6)
56.8 Points ∼39% -1%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
48.12 Points ∼33% -16%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Tablet (24 - 342, n=37, last 2 years)
119 Points ∼100% +159%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
76 Points ∼64% +65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
75 Points ∼63% +63%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
55 Points ∼46% +20%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)
55 Points ∼46% +20%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (43 - 54, n=6)
48 Points ∼40% +4%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
46 Points ∼39%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (12.6 - 376, n=34, last 2 years)
98.9 runs/min ∼100% +354%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
33.35 runs/min ∼34% +53%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)
31.4 runs/min ∼32% +44%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (21.8 - 29.1, n=6)
27.3 runs/min ∼28% +25%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
25.64 runs/min ∼26% +18%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
21.8 runs/min ∼22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (3920 - 74614, n=37, last 2 years)
29348 Points ∼100% +130%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)
16947 Points ∼58% +33%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
14722 Points ∼50% +16%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
12744 Points ∼43%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (10432 - 12744, n=7)
11460 Points ∼39% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
10787 Points ∼37% -15%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
9996 Points ∼34% -22%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
4122 ms * ∼100% -28%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (3227 - 4076, n=6)
3548 ms * ∼86% -10%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
3227.4 ms * ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
3060 ms * ∼74% +5%
Average of class Tablet (451 - 12972, n=38, last 2 years)
3049 ms * ∼74% +6%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)
2793 ms * ∼68% +13%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
2762 ms * ∼67% +14%

* ... smaller is better

在我们的审查样本中发现的eMMC 5.1存储,考虑到其存储技术,提供了一个坚实的速度,但以今天的标准,它仍然感觉非常慢。特别是小数据块的读写率非常低。LTE版本的UFS 2.2与Snapdragon处理器相结合,应该会快得多,与Tab P11 Plus相当。 Tab P11 Plus.

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3Lenovo Tab P11 PlusHuawei MatePad T10SSamsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022Teclast T40 ProAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
123%
7%
10%
56%
-12%
177%
Sequential Read 256KB
393.23
503
28%
302.9
-23%
255.1
-35%
260.9
-34%
273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=192)
-31%
770 ?(151.1 - 2031, n=35, last 2 years)
96%
Sequential Write 256KB
234.88
205.5
-13%
99
-58%
101.1
-57%
199.2
-15%
177.1 ?(40 - 274, n=192)
-25%
439 ?(87.2 - 1559, n=35, last 2 years)
87%
Random Read 4KB
75.12
112.6
50%
51.1
-32%
68.3
-9%
94.2
25%
59 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=192)
-21%
136.2 ?(10.1 - 310, n=35, last 2 years)
81%
Random Write 4KB
23.97
126.1
426%
57.8
141%
57.5
140%
83.6
249%
31.5 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=192)
31%
130.5 ?(5.3 - 370, n=35, last 2 years)
444%

游戏 - 联想Tab M10 Plus的旧版GPU

不幸的是,我们无法为Tab M10 Plus第三代提供准确的帧率,因为GameBench应用程序在测试游戏性能时出现问题。只要从GameBench应用中启动游戏,联想Tab的屏幕就会保持黑色,之后Android ,系统总是重新启动。

同时,Mali-G52 MP2已经超过四年了,它的性能水平也很低。该Galaxy Tab A8的图形单元在我们的PUBG MobileArmajet测试游戏中实现了最高30帧。射击游戏可以在联想Tab上以良好的质量(高清)进行渲染。我们没有观察到任何重大的帧率下降。然而,我们注意到Tab M10 Plus第三代在Armajet中出现了更多的停顿。由于渲染质量,我们认为竞技场射击游戏的最大帧率为60帧,我们数据库中大多数配备Mali-G52 MP2的设备都是这种情况。

联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测

排放--联想平板电脑保持冷静

温度

联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
GFX基准测试显示Tab M10 Plus表现稳定

这款廉价的中端平板电脑的外壳在日常使用中几乎不发热,即使在负载下,我们也只测量到温度上升到最高36.7℃(约98°F)。我们使用GFXBench应用程序的电池测试来检查Tab M10 Plus Gen 3内部的热量排放。曼哈顿3.1测试清楚地表明,即使运行了30次,帧率也几乎没有下降,这意味着负载下的性能下降是不可能的。

3DMark测试也显示了类似的情况。Wild Life压力测试也运行平稳,一致性超过95%。因此,即使在连续的负载下,联想Tab也没有经历任何明显的节流。

3DMark Wild Life stress test

012345678Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.1 (4.03-4.12)
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.09 (8.08-8.11)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.34 (3.33-3.35)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.26 (4.25-4.27)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø4.27 (4.26-4.29)
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø1.038 (1.025-1.051)
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø2.31 (2.28-2.31)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø0.92 (0.907-0.927)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.096 (1.091-1.101)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø1.097 (1.093-1.102)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø4.25 (4.24-4.25)
Max. Load
 34.4 °C33.1 °C30.9 °C 
 34 °C31.4 °C29.2 °C 
 33.4 °C29 °C28.4 °C 
Maximum: 34.4 °C
Average: 31.5 °C
30.7 °C31 °C36.7 °C
28.5 °C29.3 °C31.6 °C
28 °C29.6 °C30.4 °C
Maximum: 36.7 °C
Average: 30.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  31.4 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.4 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.4 °C / 87 F.
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测
联想Tab M10 Plus(第三代)平板电脑评测

发言人

Tab M10 Plus第三代的四个杜比全景声认证的扬声器(x4-1瓦)分布在平板电脑的左右两侧,形成真正的立体声,最大音量超过84分贝。联想Tab的声音是通过中音和高音传递的,而超高音调则受到一些影响。在声音模式上,低频和低音也很难被感知。

耳机可以通过蓝牙5.0或5.1(取决于版本)以及USB-C端口连接到相应的联想M10型号。Tab M10 Plus支持AAC、aptX和aptX HD编解码器,以及LDAC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203934.62524.426.33120.425.34018.323.95030.729.16325.521.18023.923.610018.129.31252038.716025.253.420016.854.925014.456.93151756.140011.857.950012.966.663014.668.880013.673100012.274.9125013.672.5160013.872.3200013.475.4250013.471.8315013.467.5400013.569.4500013.473.3630013.576.1800013.272.11000013.566.31250013.665.61600013.358.6SPL25.984.4N0.761.3median 13.5median 67.5Delta1.68.129.538.833.136.727.431.131.331.930.336.629.627.124.125.520.732.917.638.314.845.312.350.212.857.510.458.5961.311.365.114.465.117.169.71471.410.471.39.471.610.66811.469.413.670.813.770.115.368.215.469.716.664.217.65917.357.617.649.826.381.20.751median 14median 65.12.88.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Lenovo Tab P11 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

能源管理--联想Tab M10 Plus配备大电池

能源消耗

使用附带的10瓦充电器,完全耗尽的电池可在大约4小时30分钟内完全充电。如果你不一定想过夜充电,我们建议购买方便的20瓦电源适配器。这将使充电过程缩短约2小时。

对于一个10.6英寸的平板电脑来说,空闲消耗不是很有效,在没有负载的情况下,超过4瓦的耗电量也不是很好。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.07 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.94 / 4.22 / 4.37 Watt
Load midlight 6.12 / 9.14 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
7500 mAh
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
7700 mAh
Huawei MatePad T10S
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7040 mAh
Teclast T40 Pro
7000 mAh
Power Consumption
18%
-14%
-13%
-9%
Idle Minimum *
0.94
1.4
-49%
1.6
-70%
1.19
-27%
1.44
-53%
Idle Average *
4.22
1.6
62%
2.8
34%
4.63
-10%
3.87
8%
Idle Maximum *
4.37
1.9
57%
3.5
20%
4.68
-7%
3.91
11%
Load Average *
6.12
5.3
13%
7.9
-29%
7.27
-19%
7.1
-16%
Load Maximum *
9.14
8.7
5%
11.5
-26%
9.17
-0%
8.88
3%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mediatek Helio G80: Ø4.17 (1.805-8.74)
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mediatek Helio G90T: Ø3.96 (2.19-8.76)

Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mediatek Helio G80; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.17 (3.94-4.7)
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mediatek Helio G90T; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.95 (4.61-5.32)
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mediatek Helio G80; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.848 (1.807-2.28)
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mediatek Helio G90T; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.477 (1.407-1.59)

电池寿命

Tab M10 Plus第三代的额定容量为7,500毫安时,其电池比其兄弟姐妹机型略小。 P11 Plus但这并没有对联想平板电脑的运行时间产生负面影响。

在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,Tab M10 Plus第三代的运行时间非常长,超过15小时,调整后的显示屏亮度为150cd/m²。在禁用Wi-Fi模块的情况下,电池还为这台10.6英寸的平板电脑提供了19小时的良好运行时间,连续播放视频。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
39h 33min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 102)
15h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 11min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 59min
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
7500 mAh
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
7700 mAh
Huawei MatePad T10S
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7040 mAh
Teclast T40 Pro
7000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-17%
-39%
-19%
-11%
Reader / Idle
2373
1798
-24%
1354
-43%
1973
-17%
H.264
1151
993
-14%
625
-46%
824
-28%
WiFi v1.3
909
814
-10%
557
-39%
679
-25%
806
-11%
Load
239
194
-19%
175
-27%
230
-4%

Pros

+ 做工良好
+ 从Wi-Fi版本开始包括GPS
+ 明亮的IPS面板
+ 令人愉悦的扬声器
+ 废热少
+ 手写笔输入
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 只有60赫兹
- 薄弱的SoC
- 在Wi-Fi版本中没有UFS存储
- 20瓦的电源适配器需要额外收费才能使用

对联想Tab M10 Plus的评判

在审查中。联想Tab M10 Plus。测试设备由冯-联想德国公司提供
在审查中。联想Tab M10 Plus。测试设备由冯-联想德国公司提供

联想的第三代Tab M10 Plus是一款不错的中档Android ,提供手写笔输入支持。它的制造质量和手感令人满意,显示屏漂亮而明亮,四扬声器系统足够响亮,同时还能提供良好的音频质量。由于采用了7500毫安时的电池,其电池运行时间也非常有竞争力。

Tab M10 Plus第三代的最大 "问题 "是它的兄弟姐妹机型Tab P11 Plus,它的功能明显更强大,它有一套更好的功能,而且它提供更全面的配件,包括键盘盖。然而,这两款联想平板电脑在价格上不相上下。Tab M10 Plus Gen 3在测试时确实没有遇到Tab P11 Plus的粗略性能缺陷(使用Android 11),但我们假设联想在Android 12端口上普遍做得更好,因此这些差异并不存在。

联想Tab M10 Plus第三代是一款不错的多媒体平板电脑,价格也很吸引人。想用联想Tab提高生产力的用户应该选择P11 Plus的兄弟姐妹机型。

此外,那些寻找支持手写笔和键盘盖的优秀中档平板电脑的人应该仔细看看华为MatePad 11。虽然这款华为平板电脑比Tab M10 Plus第三代贵一些,但它提供了一个强大的整体包装,有120赫兹的显示屏,USB 3.2,UFS 3.1,以及骁龙865处理器。不过,用户在这里将不得不不使用应用程序和谷歌服务。


价格和可用性

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 - 06/29/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
82 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
69 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
44 / 70 → 63%
Weight
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Battery
91%
Display
87%
Games Performance
15 / 78 → 19%
Application Performance
55 / 92 → 59%
Temperature
93%