Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarRealme C55 智能手机评测--运行时间长、充电快
潜在的竞争对手比较
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78.5 % | 08/2023 | Realme C55 Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2 | 189.5 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.72" | 2400x1080 | |
| 78.5 % | 06/2023 | Honor X8a Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2 | 179 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.70" | 2388x1080 | |
| 80.1 % | 05/2023 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G SD 685, Adreno 610 | 188 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 75.9 % | 07/2023 | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 201 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 |
外壳和设备 - 还可根据要求提供黄色外壳
realme C55 棱角分明的外观和圆润的边角给人留下了深刻的第一印象，因此这款手机的手感也很好。
我们的测试设备采用经典黑色，背面看起来像金属拉丝。尽管设计质量很高，但它只是由塑料制成。光面相机模块在这里显得有些格格不入。名为 "Sunshower "的黄色版本更加有趣，它的背面采用了彩虹色。
这款手机看起来相当轻薄，尤其是与 三星Galaxy A14 LTE.
realme C55 有两种存储版本：
- 128 GB 大容量存储/6 GB 内存：219 欧元
- 256 GB 大容量存储/8 GB 内存：259 欧元
realme 宣传显着更大的 RAM，但它是部分虚拟 RAM 的系统使用显着较慢的大容量存储闪存的一部分。因此，这个虚拟内存应该可以让需要大量内存的应用程序正常运行，但也会降低它们的运行速度。
得益于 NFC 技术，谷歌支付等服务可以顺利使用。这款手机可以接受两张 SIM 卡，还有一个 microSD 专用插槽。在我们使用参考 microSD Angelbird V60 进行的测试中，读卡器的读取速度有点慢。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (10.9 - 77, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Angelbird V60) | |
| Realme C55 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 配备最新软件的 4G 手机
价格低廉的 realme C55 是一款 4G 智能手机，支持国内使用所需的大部分频率。不过，您应该仔细检查是否可以在进一步旅行的目的地国家使用手机上网。
在我们的测试期间，手机接收效果比较一般，但在市内环境中从未出现过完全中断的情况。
这款中端手机还配备了 WiFi 5，在我们的测试中，realme C55 实现了相当不错的稳定传输速率，最高可达 384 MBit/s。
Android 13 预装在智能手机上，realme UI 位于其上方，在某些方面对系统的改变较大。在测试时，安全补丁是从 2023 年 7 月开始的，因此是最新的。不过，目前还不知道更新会持续多久。此外，您还必须处理制造商在出厂时预装的许多第三方应用程序。
一些信息会出现在前置摄像头周围的显示屏上，其灵感来自Apple 的动态岛。但这并不总是可见的，例如在连接充电器时会弹出。
90 Hz 的触摸屏非常容易使用，表面也很光滑。待机键右侧集成了指纹传感器，可在短暂延迟后可靠解锁手机。人脸识别功能也可用。不过，它只适用于二维图像，因此容易受到操控。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Realme C55 | |
| Honor X8a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Realme C55 | |
| Honor X8a | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
摄像机 - 视频部分的优势
realme C55 的主摄像头像素高达 6400 万，它想成为一款非常特别的产品。事实上，通常只使用 1/4的分辨率，从而获得感光度更高的 1600 万像素照片。在特殊模式下还可以使用全分辨率。
主摄像头拍摄的照片看起来色彩艳丽，乍一看也相当清晰，但只有放大后才会发现细节还原得相当粗糙。亮度也有待提高，自动对焦在弱光环境下也有问题。总的来说，这款相机的拍照效果在同价位产品中还算不错，但缺少一个灵活性更强的广角镜头。
视频最多可录制 60 帧/秒的 1080p 格式。与同价位的许多其他智能手机相比，C55 的帧频更高，画面更流畅，因此在这方面具有优势。事实上，亮度调节和自动对焦的效果相当不错，视频看起来清晰且色彩丰富。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera, flowerMain camera, surroundingsLow Light
显示屏 - 不太均匀
IPS 屏幕具有扩展的 FullHD 分辨率，亮度高达 469 cd/m²。但 小米Redmi Note 12 4G显示，AMOLED 屏幕在该价格范围内也是可行的。realme C55 的屏幕中央比两侧亮得多。
对比度尚可，因此色彩还算鲜艳，但在分光光度计的测试中，我们看到了一些偏蓝现象。色彩渲染相当逼真。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 515 cd/m²
Contrast: 1471:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.248
| Realme C55 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.72 | Honor X8a IPS, 2388x1080, 6.70 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67 | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -2% | 89% | -20% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 27.8 ? | 29 ? -4% | 2.8 ? 90% | 35.55 ? -28% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 14.1 ? | 14 ? 1% | 1.7 ? 88% | 15.68 ? -11% |
| PWM Frequency | 484 | 343500 | ||
| Screen | 15% | 37% | -91% | |
| Brightness middle | 515 | 492 -4% | 650 26% | 465 -10% |
| Brightness | 469 | 481 3% | 658 40% | 439 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 94 11% | 97 14% | 89 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.38 -9% | 0.47 -34% | |
| Contrast | 1471 | 1295 -12% | 989 -33% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.46 | 1.32 62% | 1.55 55% | 8.5 -146% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.88 | 3.37 31% | 2.59 47% | 15.8 -224% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 1.9 39% | 1.8 42% | 11.8 -281% |
| Gamma | 2.248 98% | 2.194 100% | 2.194 100% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 7320 89% | 6288 103% | 6316 103% | 10757 60% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
12% | 63% /
50% | -56% /
-77% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 27.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17898 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 无需每天充电
联发科 联发科 Helio G88联发科 Helio G88 是一款典型的中端 SoC，C55 的实际性能也不错，在竞争中并不突出。在日常使用中，系统通常运行流畅，但在要求较高的任务或同时运行多个应用程序时，卡顿总是无法避免。
我们测量到，在较长时间的长期负载下，最高温度为 47.2 °C。这一点很明显，但在日常使用中温度通常会低得多。在运行 20 次要求较高的基准测试后，SoC 会略有节流，但性能下降幅度很小。
扬声器位于智能手机的下边缘。扬声器的音量相当大，听起来相当结实，而且不会过载。语音清晰，但在音乐曲目中，乐器和人声很快就会混合成定义不清的杂音。3.5 毫米端口和蓝牙可用于连接外部音频设备。SBC、AAC、LDAC 和最重要的 aptX 编解码器可用于无线声音传输。
即使电池完全耗尽，realme C55 也能在一个多小时内充满电。这要归功于它的 33 瓦充电技术和附带的充电器。这使它成为低价中端手机中真正的快速充电手机之一。在我们的无线局域网测试中，电池续航时间也令人信服：在中等负荷下可使用 16:15 小时，适合日常使用。
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=215, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Realme C55 | |
| Honor X8a | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G88 (7611 - 10625, n=5) | |
| Realme C55 | Honor X8a | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -21% | 241% | -10% | -5% | 353% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 305.4 | 278.1 -9% | 954.87 213% | 298.69 -2% | 283 ? -7% | 1506 ? 393% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 179.2 | 224.2 25% | 709.51 296% | 200.17 12% | 193 ? 8% | 1116 ? 523% |
| Random Read 4KB | 83.6 | 61.6 -26% | 261.09 212% | 55.9 -33% | 82.4 ? -1% | 247 ? 195% |
| Random Write 4KB | 67.9 | 18.7 -72% | 231.57 241% | 55.86 -18% | 54 ? -20% | 272 ? 301% |
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
| Realme C55 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Honor X8a | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
| Realme C55 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Honor X8a | |
发言人
Realme C55 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Realme C55 | |
| Honor X8a | |
| Average of class Smartphone (424 - 2844, n=230, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 不寻常，如果需要的话
realme C55 是一款相当便宜的中端手机，它的外壳质量上乘，如果需要的话，甚至还能让人眼前一亮。它充电迅速，续航时间长，提供足够的电量供日常使用，还拥有稳定的无线局域网。
在同价位手机中，它的相机拍照效果还算不错，甚至比同价位手机更胜一筹，能以 60-fps 的速度录制 1080p 的视频。软件是最新的，但你不应该被许多预装的广告应用程序所困扰。此外，无法保证多长时间内会进行更新。
realme C55 几乎没有什么值得批评的地方：它是一款坚如磐石的中端手机，拍照效果不错。
总的来说，realme C55 被证明是一款非常出色的中端手机，但它必须与强大的竞争对手一决高下：小米 小米Redmi Note 12 4G采用了 AMOLED 显示屏，而 Honor X8a拥有更好的摄像头。
Realme C55
-
08/03/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
