Notebookcheck Logo

Cubot KingKong Mini 3评测 - 具有可靠品质的紧凑型智能手机

极其方便。 Cubot KingKong Mini 3提供更多空间和更多性能。它比上一代产品大一些,但仍然适合放在每个口袋里,而且应该能够抵御风和天气。在测试中了解一下这款方便的手机能做什么。
Android ARM Smartphone
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Cubot KingKong Mini 3 (King Kong Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G85 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
4.50 inch 22:9, 1170 x 480 pixel, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity, accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetic
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1/3/5/7/8/19/20/40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 13.4 x 131 x 58.1
Battery
3000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, charger, USB cable, 12 Months Warranty, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Weight
149 g
Price
229 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

rating
date
model
weight
drive
size
resolution
price from
75.4 %
01/2023
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
149 g128 GB eMMC Flash4.50"1170x480
86.1 %
04/2022
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core
144 g64 GB SSD4.70"1334x750
73.5 %
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300
123 g32 GB eMMC Flash4.00"1080x540
74.3 %
05/2021
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1
172 g64 GB eMMC Flash5.30"1480x720

外壳和功能 - 无IP认证

Cubot KingKong Mini 3的屏幕对角线只有4.5英寸,是目前市场上最小的智能手机之一。然而,由于它也是一款户外手机,对于屏幕尺寸来说,机身并不是非常紧凑,尤其是13.4毫米的外壳厚度显然高于标准。尽管如此,它还是很适合放在口袋里,而且还通过红色的点缀带来一些色彩。

带有金属嵌件的橡胶框架,可见的螺丝,以及光亮的背面也给手机带来了某种风格。它的手感很好,也比较轻,只有149克。外壳看起来非常坚固,应该可以抵御水和灰尘,但制造商没有说明IP认证,所以什么也不知道。在我们的测试中,在清水中浸泡5分钟并没有以任何方式影响手机的功能。

与前代产品Cubot KingKong Mini 2相比,制造商现在提供了更多的存储空间。6GB内存和128GB大容量存储属于中档水平。然而,价格也大幅增加:前代产品从制造商那里只需不到120欧元,而你必须多付110欧元,这几乎是两倍的价格。

作为回报,现在也有了NFC,但你必须没有microSD阅读器。

Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Cubot KingKong Mini 3

尺寸比较

147.1 mm 71.6 mm 9.2 mm 172 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 144 g131 mm 58.1 mm 13.4 mm 149 g119 mm 58 mm 12.1 mm 123 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

通信、软件和操作 - 少数的4G频率

此外,Cubot KingKong Mini 3只是一款4G手机,支持的频率相当少,所以在进一步旅行时,你可能会遇到当地蜂窝网络的问题。另一方面,Wi-Fi 5模块在我们与参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000的测试中表现良好,并提供约300 - 350 Mbps的稳定传输速率。

Cubot安装了一个相当纯粹的Android 12,没有额外的预装应用程序。安全补丁是2022年12月的,因此在测试时仍然是相当最新的。然而,目前还没有关于KingKong Mini 3将获得多长时间更新的信息。只有12个月的短暂保修期有点让人讨厌。

Cubot手机没有指纹传感器。该手机只能通过面部识别进行生物解锁。这在光线良好的情况下效果很好,但由于是纯软件解决方案,没有额外的传感器,所以有些不安全。60赫兹的屏幕可以可靠地操作,但你应该记住,4.5英寸屏幕上的按钮非常小。作为回报,即使是小手,你也可以轻松地接触到整个屏幕表面。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
327 (291min - 337max) MBit/s
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
802.11a/b/g/n
324 (317min - 329max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
802.11a/b/g/n
329 (307min - 338max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
327 (269min - 339max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Apple iPhone SE 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
888 (869min - 906max) MBit/s +141%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
369 (328min - 379max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Apple iPhone SE 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
746 (599min - 768max) MBit/s +130%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
324 (294min - 336max) MBit/s
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Cubot KingKong Mini 3; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø324 (294-336)
Cubot KingKong Mini 3; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (328-379)

照相机--前景黯淡

来自前置摄像头的照片
来自前置摄像头的照片

索尼的IMX350最大分辨率为2000万像素,被用作背面的主摄像头的照片传感器。即使在光线良好的情况下,照片也经常看起来被洗掉,但至少显示了一定的细节。

在非常低的光线和高对比度的情况下,图片只在光线最强的地方成功,否则就会出现黑暗。在我们的实验室里,在1勒克斯的光照强度下,图片中没有任何东西可以被识别。

视频可以以最大的1080p和30帧的速度录制。同样,图片有点暗,所以需要良好的照明条件。你经常要手动调整焦距,因为它没有反应或反应不充分。

前面有一个500万像素的自拍摄像头,但它只能拍摄亮度较差的照片,即使在平均光线条件下也非常嘈杂。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
ColorChecker
18.2 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
15 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Cubot KingKong Mini 3: 12.92 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 19.58 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
65.7 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Cubot KingKong Mini 3: 47.36 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 94.34 ∆E

显示屏--Cubot手机的光明面

子像素结构
子像素结构

显示屏的分辨率很低:1170 x 480像素,即使对这样一个小屏幕来说也只够用。至少最大亮度为624cd/m2,平均来说非常高。因此,Cubot KingKong Mini 3也可以在较亮的环境中使用。

然而,亮度分布是相当不均匀的,所以当你仔细观察时,你可以看到个别图像区域的差异。黑色水平以及由此产生的对比度也不是最佳的,图像表现看起来有点暗淡。

我们注意到在明亮的灰阶中有明显的蓝色偏移。该显示器没有使用PWM来降低亮度。

569
cd/m²
632
cd/m²
676
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
639
cd/m²
688
cd/m²
563
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
668
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 688 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 624.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.88 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 639 cd/m²
Contrast: 1065:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
81.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.223
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
IPS, 1170x480, 4.50
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Retina HD, IPS, 1334x750, 4.70
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
IPS, 1080x540, 4.00
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
PLS, 1480x720, 5.30
Response Times
-3%
5%
-36%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44.6 ?(21.3, 23.3)
56 ?(27, 29)
-26%
46 ?(23, 23)
-3%
60 ?(31, 29)
-35%
Response Time Black / White *
25 ?(12.5, 12.5)
20 ?(7, 13)
20%
22 ?(7, 15)
12%
34 ?(17, 17)
-36%
PWM Frequency
354.6 ?(15)
Screen
35%
-15%
-16%
Brightness middle
639
662
4%
624
-2%
525
-18%
Brightness
624
647
4%
633
1%
491
-21%
Brightness Distribution
82
92
12%
90
10%
87
6%
Black Level *
0.6
0.4
33%
0.87
-45%
0.53
12%
Contrast
1065
1655
55%
717
-33%
991
-7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.98
1.44
71%
5.21
-5%
5.54
-11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.55
4.74
45%
10.59
-24%
10.23
-20%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4
1.7
57%
4.8
-20%
6.7
-68%
Gamma
2.223 99%
2.179 101%
2.585 85%
2.318 95%
CCT
6873 95%
6746 96%
6953 93%
8555 76%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
16% / 28%
-5% / -11%
-26% / -20%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.5 ms rise
↘ 12.5 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.3 ms rise
↘ 23.3 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN色彩空间
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命--紧凑格式下的中端动力

有了 Helio G85制造商选择了一个已经有三年历史的中端SoC,但仍然相当强大。因此,这款手机提供的功率大大超过了,比如说 三星Galaxy XCover 5尤其是比前代产品更强大。在日常使用中,它在浏览菜单时几乎没有抖动,即使是比较复杂的应用程序也能相当流畅地显示。

存储器提供了典型的慢速eMMC闪存的传输速率。这是一个遗憾,Cubot当然可以在系统中实现更多的感知速度,因为加载和数据传输需要相当长的时间。

外壳上的最高温度为39.4°C,这一点很明显,但仍在限度之内。此外,它并不影响SoC的长期性能,正如3DMark的压力测试向我们展示的那样。

这款手机的听筒也作为扬声器使用,这有助于将声音引向用户。扬声器可以变得相当响亮,但随后听起来相当紧张,高音很重。如果你把音量调低一点,声音就会变得更加平衡,你肯定能听完一段音乐。

然而,真正好的音质是通过耳机或外部扬声器实现的,可以通过蓝牙或USB-C连接。支持的无线编解码器有aptX、aptX HD、SBC、AAC和LDAC。

超过3000毫安时的电池目前很难在这样一个紧凑的情况下找到。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,Cubot KingKong Mini 3没有达到前代产品的强大运行时间,但它仍能以14:23小时的时间说服人,应该可以为几天的适度使用提供足够的能量。

这款手机通过附带的充电器以最大10瓦的功率进行充电。因此,它最多需要2个小时就能充满电。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
1741 Points +405%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=214, last 2 years)
900 Points +161%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (344 - 437, n=12)
360 Points +4%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
345 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
183 Points -47%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
134 Points -61%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
4788 Points +304%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=214, last 2 years)
2947 Points +149%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1184 - 1363, n=12)
1306 Points +10%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1184 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
926 Points -22%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
439 Points -63%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=209, last 2 years)
11643 Points +72%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (6596 - 9338, n=10)
7876 Points +16%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
6782 Points
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=104, last 2 years)
2680 Points +93%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1387 - 1463, n=11)
1418 Points +2%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1387 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
861 Points -38%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
245 Points -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=104, last 2 years)
2667 Points +111%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1266 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1237 - 1268, n=11)
1256 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
739 Points -42%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
203 Points -84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=104, last 2 years)
3126 Points +50%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2084 - 2654, n=11)
2533 Points +22%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2084 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2034 Points -2%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
869 Points -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=177, last 2 years)
6571 Points +372%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1393 - 1453, n=11)
1431 Points +3%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1393 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
872 Points -37%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
260 Points -81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=176, last 2 years)
9383 Points +660%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1234 - 1281, n=11)
1261 Points +2%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1234 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
745 Points -40%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
216 Points -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=176, last 2 years)
4169 Points +65%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2533 - 2811, n=11)
2680 Points +6%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2533 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2152 Points -15%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
899 Points -65%
Wild Life Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
8357 Points +1032%
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 9839, n=132, last 2 years)
2528 Points +243%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
738 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (706 - 761, n=12)
732 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
430 Points -42%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
8909 Points +1109%
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=197, last 2 years)
6135 Points +732%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
737 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (698 - 757, n=12)
731 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
429 Points -42%
Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
2399 Points +1190%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 5226, n=202, last 2 years)
1647 Points +785%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (181 - 193, n=11)
186.2 Points 0%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
186 Points
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
1877 Points +904%
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=197, last 2 years)
1656 Points +786%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
187 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (178 - 191, n=11)
184.2 Points -1%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
60 fps +173%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=221, last 2 years)
43.1 fps +96%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
22 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (7.5 - 22, n=13)
12.2 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
12 fps -45%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
6.1 fps -72%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
95.9 fps +1015%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=221, last 2 years)
63.1 fps +634%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (8 - 9.7, n=13)
9.13 fps +6%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
8.6 fps
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
6.2 fps -28%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
2 fps -77%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
60 fps +362%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 105, n=221, last 2 years)
32.1 fps +147%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
13 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (5 - 13, n=13)
7.87 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
7.4 fps -43%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
3.9 fps -70%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
39 fps +1082%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=221, last 2 years)
25.1 fps +661%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (3.1 - 3.5, n=13)
3.38 fps +2%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
3.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2.2 fps -33%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
0.7 fps -79%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
65969 Points +433%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4633 - 89112, n=205, last 2 years)
33314 Points +169%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
12386 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (10299 - 13977, n=10)
12223 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4875 Points -61%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3Cubot King Kong Mini 2Samsung Galaxy XCover 5Average 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-29%
55%
39%
524%
Sequential Read 256KB
277.3
275.5
-1%
268.5
-3%
283 ?(106.7 - 511, n=73)
2%
1471 ?(215 - 4512, n=213, last 2 years)
430%
Sequential Write 256KB
131
137.8
5%
273.6
109%
192.9 ?(72.3 - 314, n=73)
47%
1084 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=213, last 2 years)
727%
Random Read 4KB
43
25.5
-41%
121
181%
82.6 ?(8.63 - 247, n=73)
92%
243 ?(22.2 - 543, n=213, last 2 years)
465%
Random Write 4KB
46.4
9.4
-80%
14.7
-68%
53.9 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=73)
16%
267 ?(13 - 709, n=213, last 2 years)
475%

温度

Max. Load
 39.4 °C38.1 °C36.1 °C 
 39.1 °C36.9 °C35.9 °C 
 39.4 °C36.9 °C35.8 °C 
Maximum: 39.4 °C
Average: 37.5 °C
31.3 °C32.8 °C35.5 °C
31.7 °C32.6 °C35.8 °C
31.8 °C33.1 °C35.9 °C
Maximum: 35.9 °C
Average: 33.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.7 °C | Room Temperature 19.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.7 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图 背面
热图 背面
051015202530354045Tooltip
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø10.7 (9.12-14.9)
Cubot KingKong Mini 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.47 (4.42-4.49)
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.3 (39-49)

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.534.1253528.73132.129.64032.533.95036.6356330.333.1803120.310025.725.112525.634.816023.941.320019.744.125017.448.33151951.740016.856.650017.86163017.865.680022.667.6100022.671.412502274160021.573.9200021.974.4250020.673.731501771.6400016.275500015.475.263001567.5800015.364.31000015.8621250016.562.51600017.451.6SPL31.784.2N1.555.9median 17.8median 64.3Delta2.910.64342.536.837.536.829.530.632.53433.12928.425.519.329.320.323.91614.224.511.333.411.741.19.747.39.352.111.857.413.756.417.362.416.268.311.167.810.369.810.468.611.666.612.667.213.965.615.266.415.669.316.372.216.567.316.458.217.147.465.971.426.479.619.226.50.843.9median 14.2median 62.4median 13.6median 61.74.412.812.817.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseCubot KingKong Mini 3Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Cubot KingKong Mini 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
3000 mAh
1072 min +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (424 - 2844, n=223, last 2 years)
912 min +6%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
3000 mAh
863 min
Apple iPhone SE 2022
2018 mAh
769 min -11%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
3000 mAh
657 min -24%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
14h 23min

Pros

+ 良好的中端性能
+ 屏幕明亮
+ 非常方便
+ NFC
+ 良好的运行时间
+ 在较长的负载下没有节流现象

Cons

- 糟糕的摄像头
- 屏幕分辨率低
- 没有IP认证
- 只有1年的保修期
- 少量的4G频率

结论 - 更加昂贵,更加强大

在审查中。Cubot KingKong Mini 3。
在审查中。Cubot KingKong Mini 3。

出厂后,Cubot KingKong Mini 3的价格与前代产品相比几乎翻了一番。然而,它在互联网上已经大幅下降,新机型也有一些改进:最明显的是性能的提高,现在处于中档水平,通常足以让系统顺利运行。

然后是NFC,这将使所有移动支付服务的朋友满意。扬声器做得很好,显示屏在需要时仍然非常明亮。

虽然它在我们的测试中顺利通过了潜水,但它对自然界的力量究竟有多强大仍是未知数。IP认证在这里会有帮助。

小的显示屏有一些优点,如方便和容易单手操作,但也有一些问题,因为按钮非常小。我们对相机没有信心,它几乎没有达到任何亮度,而且经常产生冲淡或噪音的照片。

像Cubot KingKong Mini 3这样方便的智能手机已经很少见了。此外,现在有中档的性能和明亮的屏幕,但仍然很难有可用的相机。

三星Galaxy XCover 5要大得多,但仍然比其他手机更方便,也更坚固。然而,它提供的功能要少得多。如果你想在一个有IP认证的小格式中获得大量的性能,你可以去选择 iPhone SE 2022但其价格要高得多。

价格和可用性

Cubot KingKong Mini 3可在amazon.de。,比如说。在审查的时候,价格也下降了很多。这款手机的售价约为166欧元(约166美元)。

Cubot KingKong Mini 3 - 01/16/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
42 / 70 → 60%
Weight
92%
Battery
90%
Display
84%
Games Performance
17 / 64 → 26%
Application Performance
58 / 86 → 67%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
60 / 90 → 67%
Camera
34%
Average
69%
75%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Cubot KingKong Mini 3评测 - 具有可靠品质的紧凑型智能手机
Florian Schmitt, 2023-01-17 (Update: 2023-01-17)