关于摩托罗拉 Moto G06 的结论
摩托罗拉 Moto G06 是一款典型的打折手机：它的价格非常实惠，但功能还算合格，适合日常使用。时尚的外壳让这款手机看起来比实际价格更贵。
你不应该对它的性能抱太高的期望，但在这个价位上，120 Hz 无 PWM 屏幕的亮度、电池续航时间和可用的主摄像头都还不错。
很短的更新承诺很难符合新的欧盟指令，在可持续发展方面也仍然没有答案。与上一代产品相比，水滴形凹槽和低充电功率是一个倒退。
总体而言，摩托罗拉 Moto G06 是一款极具吸引力且价格实惠的智能手机，具有典型的价格特征。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
这款智能手机尚未在美国正式发售。在英国，你可以在amazon.co.uk 上以约 200 英镑的价格买到它。
规格
表壳和功能 - 真正的设计师作品
我们喜欢摩托罗拉将其设计理念延伸到最经济实惠的机型上，采用仿皮背壳和无缝集成的摄像头模块。
Moto G06 还具有防尘防水功能，因此在肮脏的环境中使用也不会有任何问题。不过，这款手机不能潜水。
正面没有了冲孔摄像头，现在又多了一个水滴形凹槽，这在设计上是一种倒退。这款手机重 194 克，比上一代产品略重，而且由于屏幕更大，整体长度和宽度也增加了几毫米。
支持无线支付的 NFC 功能也已配备。在内存方面，你可以选择 64、128 或 256 GB。所有机型均配备 4 GB 内存。
内置内存可通过 microSD 卡扩展。在我们的测试中，读卡器的运行速度适中。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Motorola Moto G05 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto G06 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G (Angelbird V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A06 (Angelbird V60) | |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
通信和操作 - Moto G06 上稳定的无线局域网
Moto G06 可与 Wi-Fi 网络进行可靠、稳定的数据传输。速度达到了预期水平，约为 300 MBit/s，比上一代产品略快。
目前还没有 5G 移动网络，LTE 范围内的可用频率也不多，但对于大多数欧洲国家来说已经足够。在我们测试过程中的抽查中，接收效果令人满意。
屏幕的帧频高达 120 Hz，因此能快速响应我们通过触摸屏输入的信息。操作十分可靠。
待机键右侧还有一个指纹传感器。它能可靠地识别手指，并在最短的等待时间内解锁手机。还可以通过前置摄像头进行人脸识别。
| Networking | |
| Motorola Moto G06 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G05 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A06 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
软件和可持续性--一些问号
Android 15 预装，摩托罗拉只对软件进行小改动。第三方广告应用程序已预装。
与前代产品一样，摩托罗拉只在 Moto G06 发布之日起两年内提供更新，即直到 2027 年 8 月。这是否符合新的欧盟指令还有待观察。
没有关于可持续发展的信息。至少包装是无塑料的。
相机 - 花很少的钱获得不错的图像质量
在 Moto G06 上，你不应该期待配备多个镜头的拍照系统。唯一的摄像头分辨率为 5000 万像素，全分辨率可在特殊模式下使用。不过，在这种模式下，摄像头的光照强度明显下降。
在常规模式下，图像的分辨率为 1250 万像素，其中一些细节显得有些粗糙，但就该价格范围而言，总体还不算太差。
在弱光和高对比度环境下，照片的清晰度还算不错，但在暗处几乎无法辨认。
前置摄像头的自拍效果尚可，但在色彩方面显得相当冷淡。
显示屏 - 大且无闪烁
这款手机采用 6.88 英寸大屏幕，分辨率为 1,640 x 720 像素，但 PPI 只有 260，在某些情况下会导致画面有些粗糙。
超过 530 cd/m² 的最大亮度相当不错，足以应付稍亮的环境。因此，摩托罗拉也弥补了前代产品亮度较低的不足。
色彩还原方面略微偏蓝。我们没有注意到任何 PWM 闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 531 cd/m²
Contrast: 1770:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.28 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
93.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.235
CCT: 7429 K
| Motorola Moto G06 IPS, 1640x720, 6.9" | Motorola Moto G05 IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G IPS, 1600x720, 6.9" | Samsung Galaxy A06 IPS, 1600x720, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 9% | -6% | -59% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 531 | 370 -30% | 526 -1% | 505 -5% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 512 | 358 -30% | 513 0% | 475 -7% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 94 | 92 -2% | 95 1% | 89 -5% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.3 | 0.24 20% | 0.4 -33% | 0.53 -77% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1770 | 1542 -13% | 1315 -26% | 953 -46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.28 | 2.09 51% | 6.4 -50% | 5.94 -39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.77 | 5.49 19% | 4.88 28% | 21.63 -219% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 1.7 53% | 2.3 36% | 6.2 -72% |
| Gamma | 2.235 98% | 2.317 95% | 2.116 104% | |
| CCT | 7429 87% | 6405 101% | 6785 96% | 8333 78% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 8.86 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8152 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 几乎没有电量
联发科 联发科 Helio G81联发科 Helio G81 是一款相当慢的 SoC；即使在这个价位，其他制造商有时也能提供更强的性能。此外，由于没有最新的图形接口，某些游戏可能无法运行。
机身温度始终保持在 40 °C 以下，因此非常合理。在压力测试中，手机也没有出现卡顿现象。
底部边缘的小型扬声器由听筒支持，因此可以产生轻微的立体声效果。手机可以发出相当响亮的声音，但这显然是以牺牲声音精度为代价的。
如果稍稍降低音量，声音会更加悦耳和精确。3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙可用于声音输出。可通过各种编解码器连接无线音频设备。
电池续航时间在同价位产品中完全可以接受：在我们的 WLAN 测试中，摩托罗拉 5,200 毫安时电池的续航时间为 16:42 小时。这样的续航时间应该可以满足一天的需求。
不过，充电功率最高只能达到 10 瓦。与前代产品相比，最长充电时间增加了：现在超过了 2 小时。
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision NPU 1.5 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G | |
| Motorola Moto G06 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G81 (n=1) | |
| Half Precision NPU 1.5 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G | |
| Motorola Moto G06 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G81 (n=1) | |
| Quantized NPU 1.5 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G06 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G81 (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G | |
| Motorola Moto G06 | Motorola Moto G05 | Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G | Samsung Galaxy A06 | Average 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -9% | -13% | -18% | -19% | 429% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 301 | 289.9 -4% | 298.5 -1% | 295.4 -2% | 278 ? -8% | 2213 ? 635% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 243.5 | 246.8 1% | 201.1 -17% | 166.3 -32% | 214 ? -12% | 1829 ? 651% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 100 | 100.8 1% | 87.4 -13% | 74 -26% | 80.5 ? -19% | 293 ? 193% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 99.2 | 67.6 -32% | 77.5 -22% | 86.8 -12% | 63.8 ? -36% | 335 ? 238% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Moto G06 | |
| Motorola Moto G05 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A06 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Motorola Moto G06 | |
| Motorola Moto G05 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G | |
Motorola Moto G06 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A06 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Motorola Moto G06 5200 mAh | Motorola Moto G05 5200 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A06 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 16.7 | 16.2 -3% | 21 26% | 15.6 -7% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
相当明亮的屏幕和时尚的外壳是经济实惠的摩托罗拉 Moto G06 的亮点。
不过，与 Moto G05 相比，它也有一些小瑕疵。
Motorola Moto G06
- 11/17/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 71%  | Motorola Moto G06 Mediatek Helio G81 ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 256 GB eMMC | Amazon: 1. $7.99 beukei (3 Pack) Compatible f... 2. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... 3. $129.99 Motorola Moto G Power 5G | 2... List Price: 129€ | 194 g | 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash | 6.88" 1640x720 260 PPI IPS |
2. 71.1%  | Motorola Moto G05 Mediatek Helio G81 ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC | Amazon: 1. $109.00 Motorola Moto G05 XT2523-2 D... 2. $4.99 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 3. $32.99 Ygpmoiki LCD Screen Display ... List Price: 130€ | 189 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.56" 1612x720 269 PPI IPS |
3. 70.5%  | Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC | Amazon: $147.50 List Price: 150€ | 211 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.90" 1600x720 254 PPI IPS |
4. 68.2%  | Samsung Galaxy A06 Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC | Amazon: $104.97 List Price: 90€ | 189 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.70" 1600x720 262 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
