Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉Moto G31智能手机评论。以牺牲一些功能为代价的OLED显示屏

它的尺寸更容易管理,但它是否也更好? Moto G31变得更轻、更紧凑了,而且它现在采用了全高清显示屏。然而,与前代产品相比,也有一些妥协。在我们的评论中,我们将找出这款智能手机是否仍然是200欧元(约226美元)的好交易。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
ARM Android Smartphone
摩托罗拉Moto G31

去年,摩托罗拉通过新的Moto G系列推出了更广泛的产品系列。就在中间。的 Moto G30,它以不到190欧元(约215美元)的价格提供了相当多的东西。

继任者Moto G31现在已经到来。它是一款略微好用的智能手机,但也贵了10欧元(约合11美元),而且乍一看,你可以发现它缺乏前代产品的一些功能。例如,90赫兹显示屏或充足的存储空间。

摩托G31也许比它的前辈还要差?我们的详细评测将对此进行仔细研究。

Motorola Moto G31 (Moto G Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G85 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.40 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 411 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 44 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, shared, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (900, 2100 MHz), LTE (FDD: 700, 800, 850, 900, 1800, 2100, 2600 MHz; TDD: 2300, 2600 MHz), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 161.9 x 73.9
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase-comparison AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/​30fps (camera 1); 8.0 MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 2.0 MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.2, videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, cable, SIM tool, silicon case, 24 Months Warranty, IP52-certified, fanless, waterproof
Weight
181 g
Price
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
78.6 %
01/2022
Motorola Moto G31
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
181 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.40"2400x1080
77.6 %
03/2021
Motorola Moto G30
SD 662, Adreno 610
197 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
74.9 %
12/2021
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1
205 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
78.4 %
12/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
190 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.30"2340x1080
78.5 %
11/2021
Nokia G50
SD 480, Adreno 619
220 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.82"1560x720

尺寸为6.4英寸,Moto G31比其前代产品更加紧凑,而且重量也相当轻,只有181克。手有点小的用户会对此感到高兴。由于采用了冲孔式摄像头,正面的很大一部分可以用于屏幕,而且边框相对较窄。

我们喜欢略带纹理的塑料背面,以及坚固和高质量的构造。相机模块也有一个时尚的设计,其圆形的、几乎是有机的外观。制造商为我们提供了一个矿物灰的评测单元,尽管它也可以看起来有点偏蓝或深绿色,这取决于光线如何照射它。第二种颜色选择是婴儿蓝,一种清新的浅蓝色。

这款手机壳通过了IP52认证,所以它对灰尘和飞溅的水有相当好的保护,但你不应该把设备浸入水中。

摩托罗拉Moto G31
摩托罗拉Moto G31
摩托罗拉Moto G31
摩托罗拉Moto G31
摩托罗拉Moto G31

Size comparison

173.8 mm 77.7 mm 8.9 mm 220 g165 mm 76 mm 9 mm 197 g164 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 205 g161.9 mm 73.9 mm 8.6 mm 181 g158.3 mm 75.3 mm 8.4 mm 190 g

连接性 - 现在只有标准票价

与上一代产品相比, 储存容量方面,Moto G31,Moto G31在存储容量方面不得不忍受重大的妥协。虽然去年你仍然有6GB的内存和128GB的存储空间,但现在你将不得不使用4GB的内存和64GB的存储空间。这使该智能手机处于与以下产品相同的水平 三星Galaxy A12 Exynos的水平,如果从制造商那里购买,至少要便宜30欧元(约34美元)。

NFC仍然可用,还有一个DRM L1认证,允许你在现在更高分辨率的1080p显示屏上享受高清流媒体内容。

右边。待机按钮,音量摇杆,谷歌助理按钮
右边。待机按钮,音量摇杆,谷歌助理按钮
左边:SIM卡插槽
左边:SIM卡插槽
顶部:麦克风,3.5毫米音频插孔
顶部:麦克风,3.5毫米音频插孔
底部。麦克风、USB-C端口、扬声器
底部。麦克风、USB-C端口、扬声器

微型SD卡读卡器

用户可以使用microSD卡来扩展存储,但他们必须为此放弃一个SIM卡插槽。在读取和写入速度方面,在我们使用Angelbird V60参考微SD卡的测试中,摩托罗拉手机达到了同类产品的典型速率。然而,在三星Galaxy A12 Exynos也提供了一款具有更快的microSD读卡器的手机,而且价格更低。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
47.8 MB/s ∼100% +170%
Nokia G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.7 MB/s ∼43% +17%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
17.7 MB/s ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro)
15.71 MB/s ∼33% -11%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø35 (24.2-45.6)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø32.3 (23.2-38.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Toshiba Exceria Pro: Ø41.7 (32.2-56.9)
Nokia G50 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø34.6 (7.62-42.4)
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø76.7 (37.3-82.8)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø50.2 (31.6-54.4)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Toshiba Exceria Pro: Ø84 (59.8-90.4)
Nokia G50 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø76.3 (31.1-83.5)

软件 - 摩托罗拉手机保证获得Android 12

Android 11仍然是预装系统,但基于Android 12的My UX应该在2月开始推出,而且制造商已经确认制造商已经确认,Moto G31也将收到这一更新。然而,目前还不清楚这将在何时发生。经询问,摩托罗拉告知我们,除了这次更新外,这款智能手机不会有更多的操作系统更新。

在测试时,安全补丁是从2021年12月开始的,这意味着它们仍然是相当最新的,对于一个相对低价的智能手机来说,这是一个不错的表现。安全更新计划从推出后的三年内进行,所以可能要到2024年底。

传统上,摩托罗拉使用相当纯粹的Android ,所有的特殊功能都捆绑在Moto应用程序中。此外,摩托罗拉希望通过ThinkShield for Mobile确保用户的数据在任何时候都得到保护。例如,这包括对供应商以及内置硬件功能的详细检查和增强软件,使设备更加安全。

摩托罗拉Moto G31软件
摩托罗拉Moto G31软件
摩托罗拉Moto G31软件

通信和GNSS - 4G,接收良好

得益于Wi-Fi 5,Moto G31的WLAN传输速率达到了约350 Mb/s,这在该级别中是很常见的。在我们用Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器进行的测试中,这款手机的表现略好于其前辈。

寻找具有5G功能的智能手机的用户不会对Moto G31感到满意。你在这里只能得到最必要的4G频率,所以根据国家的不同,在国际旅行中可能无法使用移动互联网,因为手机无法与当地网络通信。

然而,如果你能接入4G网络,接收效果相当稳定,它甚至可以与高端智能手机竞争,如iPhone 13就信号强度而言。至少在我们的抽样测试中,我们可以确认摩托罗拉Moto G31具有良好的移动接收能力。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1395, n=234, last 2 years)
482 MBit/s ∼100% +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
347 (338min - 353max) MBit/s ∼72% 0%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
346 (334min - 352max) MBit/s ∼72%
Nokia G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
322 (308min - 331max) MBit/s ∼67% -7%
Motorola Moto G30
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB eMMC Flash
273 (198min - 323max) MBit/s ∼57% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
42.9 (21min - 65max) MBit/s ∼9% -88%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1348, n=234, last 2 years)
470 MBit/s ∼100% +33%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
353 (261min - 359max) MBit/s ∼75%
Nokia G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (294min - 350max) MBit/s ∼73% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (290min - 330max) MBit/s ∼68% -9%
Motorola Moto G30
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB eMMC Flash
288 (198min - 337max) MBit/s ∼61% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
50.4 (41min - 57max) MBit/s ∼11% -86%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø353 (261-359)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø346 (334-352)

事实证明,在户外定位时,摩托罗拉手机的速度相当快。在短时间内有足够的卫星信号可用来确定位置,精确度达到非常好的2米。支持GPS、GLONASS和Galileo,同时也使用SBAS支持系统。

在我们用Garmin Venu 2作为对比设备进行的实地测试中,Moto G31显示出良好的准确性。时不时会有花园或房屋被划过,虽然我们自然是在路上,但精度完全可以满足日常使用,甚至应该满足更高的跟踪精度要求。

Garmin Venu 2定位 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 桥梁
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 桥梁
摩托罗拉Moto G31定位 - 概述
摩托罗拉Moto G31定位 - 概述
摩托罗拉Moto G31定位--转折点
摩托罗拉Moto G31定位--转折点
摩托罗拉Moto G31定位 - 桥梁
摩托罗拉Moto G31定位 - 桥梁

电话和通话质量--Moto G31,声音清晰

当然,Moto G31支持VoLTE和VoWiFi,这意味着语音信号可以通过LTE网络或Wi-Fi传输。

我们通过几个测试电话检查了手机的通话质量,我们不得不说。我们非常喜欢它。听筒和扬声器都没有发出隆隆声,麦克风能非常清晰地捕捉到我们的声音,而且没有背景噪音,即使我们非常大声或非常安静地说话。总的来说,对于这样一款低价位的手机来说,性能非常好。

照相机 - 带有混合变焦的Moto手机

前置摄像头样本
前置摄像头样本

相比之下,摩托罗拉略微缩减了相机系统。 摩托G30:主摄像头的分辨率只有5000万像素,因此它默认拍摄1200万像素的照片,并采用像素分层技术以提高亮度。此外,景深辅助镜头也被取消了,但这可能是一个可以容忍的损失,在图像质量方面几乎不会有明显的影响。

在良好的照明条件下,在户外拍摄的照片不是100%锐利,但它们总体上看起来相当不错。然而,动态范围仍然可以更高一些,这一点在弱光和高对比度下也很明显:在这里,大量的细节在黑暗区域很快就会丢失。

广角相机拍摄的照片很好,但仔细观察会很快失去细节。光线敏感度也相当低。在广角摄像头和主摄像头之间放大几步是可能的,但镜头之间的过渡没有高端手机上的那么优雅。

你不能在录制视频时变焦,所以用户必须在开始录制前选择一个镜头。通过预装的相机软件,也不可能选择30帧/秒的1080p以外的视频分辨率。这使该智能手机与同类产品相提并论。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - PlantMain camera - SurroundingsMain camera - Low lightWide-angle camera
click to load images

在实验室预定的光线条件下,Moto G31显示出对边缘的清晰度略有下降,但除此之外,图像清晰度还不错,只有在对比度方面有轻微的不足。总的来说,对于这样一款低价位的手机来说,这是一个不错的结果。

ColorChecker
15.9 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G31: 12.95 ∆E min: 2.94 - max: 20.62 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.1 ∆E
52.3 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
63 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
73.5 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
80.8 ∆E
68.2 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G31: 45.03 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 80.79 ∆E

配件和保修--Motocare提供安全保障

盒子里有各种各样的配件,摩托罗拉甚至还包括一个硅壳。当涉及到合适的替代充电器时,摩托罗拉指出其官方亚马逊商店,那里的配件仅售不到16欧元(约18美元)。

摩托罗拉为欧盟境内的买家提供24个月的保修服务。此外,你可以从摩托罗拉的官方商店购买motocare。,将保修期延长一年,价格在20至50欧元(约合人民币23至57元)之间,同时还提供可选的意外损坏保护。

输入设备和处理 - 肌肉发达的按钮

虚拟键盘来自谷歌,所以已经使用过另一款Android 智能手机的用户更有可能对其熟悉。否则,它是直观的,包括所有的基本功能。

当智能手机直立时,物理按钮位于右侧。待机按钮略微凹陷,它还包含指纹扫描仪。它能可靠而快速地工作。音量摇杆和谷歌助手的按钮位于上方。所有的硬件按钮都很容易找到,但它们的压力点有些松动。

纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘

显示屏 - 全高清OLED显示屏,价格低于200欧元(约226美元)。

子像素网格
子像素网格

几乎没有任何智能手机能像Moto G31那样以200欧元(约226美元)左右的价格提供全高清显示屏,这意味着你通常不得不求助于在此期间变得更便宜的旧设备,或者你可以看一下 小米Redmi Note 8 2021.

此外,摩托罗拉提供的OLED面板可以通过完全关闭单个二极管来显示完整的黑色,这反过来又使颜色更加闪亮。与前代产品相比,亮度明显提高,这也是一个很大的加分项,尽管这款智能手机在同类产品中仍不尽如人意。

413
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 440 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 425.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.05 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 423 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.58 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.219
Motorola Moto G31
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Motorola Moto G30
LCD IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
IPS LCD, 2340x1080, 6.30
Nokia G50
IPS, 1560x720, 6.82
Screen
-35%
-65%
-75%
-65%
Brightness middle
423
284
-33%
446
5%
496
17%
568
34%
Brightness
425
263
-38%
423
0%
491
16%
525
24%
Brightness Distribution
94
83
-12%
88
-6%
91
-3%
85
-10%
Black Level *
0.34
0.29
0.19
0.24
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.58
2.92
-85%
4.94
-213%
5.5
-248%
5.31
-236%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.68
5.06
-8%
8.81
-88%
8.88
-90%
9.04
-93%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.7
3.6
-33%
5.1
-89%
6.6
-144%
5.6
-107%
Gamma
2.219 99%
2.307 95%
2.145 103%
2.36 93%
2.517 87%
CCT
6674 97%
6780 96%
7890 82%
8432 77%
7541 86%
Contrast
835
1538
2611
2367

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 223.2 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 223.2 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 223.2 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

我们观察到PWM,这通常出现在OLED中。敏感的用户应该在购买设备之前在低亮度下测试显示屏,以了解他们是否受到闪烁的困扰。响应时间很快,这使得触摸屏也很适合游戏玩家使用。

使用 "自然 "色彩模式时,显示屏的表现令人满意,尽管在绝对白色时有一个非常轻微的绿色色调,但这些色彩显示得相当准确。

卡尔曼--灰鳞
卡尔曼--灰鳞
CalMAN--颜色精度
CalMAN--颜色精度
CalMAN - sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN - sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN - AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN - AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN - DCI P3色彩空间
CalMAN - DCI P3色彩空间
卡尔曼--饱和度
卡尔曼--饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

在可视角度方面没有任何抱怨。这款智能手机可以在阴天的户外使用,没有任何问题。然而,如果天气变好,你应该在树荫下找一个地方,否则屏幕上的反光与平均亮度相结合会使你很难看到屏幕内容。

视角
视角
户外使用
户外使用

性能 - 同类产品的标准性能水平

淘宝网联发科Helio G85被用作SoC。它有八个核心,时钟频率高达2GHz。我们的评测单位用它实现了良好的性能,与它的价格范围一致。在日常使用中,这意味着浏览菜单的感觉很快。然而,由于其90赫兹的显示屏,尽管计算能力略低,但前代产品仍然感觉更顺畅一些。

同时运行的几个应用程序或要求较高的应用程序很快将智能手机带到了极限。例如,控制音量,那时只能迟缓地完成。如果你想要更多的动力,你应该考虑稍贵的 诺基亚G50:它的骁龙480提供了相当大的计算能力。

起初,Moto G31在图形基准测试方面似乎落后,但人们应该记住,它有一个比其前辈更高分辨率的显示屏。因此,在实践中,用户当然有可能认为该智能手机在图形处理方面有点慢。在屏幕外的测试中,所有的测试都是在相同的分辨率下进行的,我们的评测设备比Moto G30有一个小的优势。 摩托G30.然而,这显然不足以弥补因高分辨率显示屏而需要的额外性能。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
353 Points ∼54%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
309 Points ∼47% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
178 Points ∼27% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
355 Points ∼54% +1%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
514 Points ∼79% +46%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (344 - 369, n=8)
354 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=262, last 2 years)
653 Points ∼100% +85%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1295 Points ∼60%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1256 Points ∼58% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1087 Points ∼51% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1336 Points ∼62% +3%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1618 Points ∼75% +25%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1259 - 1351, n=8)
1304 Points ∼61% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=262, last 2 years)
2151 Points ∼100% +66%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1230 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
646 Points ∼26% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1256 Points ∼51% +2%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
925 Points ∼37% -25%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1163 - 1256, n=7)
1213 Points ∼49% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 8702, n=200, last 2 years)
2485 Points ∼100% +102%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1148 Points ∼46%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
376 Points ∼15% -67%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
654 Points ∼26% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1165 Points ∼47% +1%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1039 Points ∼42% -9%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1148 - 1233, n=8)
1182 Points ∼48% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 9069, n=199, last 2 years)
2476 Points ∼100% +116%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6596 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
5739 Points ∼57% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
7090 Points ∼70% +7%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7111 Points ∼70% +8%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (6596 - 8672, n=5)
7552 Points ∼75% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=133, last 2 years)
10130 Points ∼100% +54%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1818 Points ∼51%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1865 Points ∼52% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1283 Points ∼36% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1876 Points ∼52% +3%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3599 Points ∼100% +98%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1818 - 1898, n=7)
1850 Points ∼51% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=196, last 2 years)
3417 Points ∼95% +88%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1674 Points ∼43%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1764 Points ∼45% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1126 Points ∼29% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1732 Points ∼44% +3%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3792 Points ∼96% +127%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1627 - 1759, n=7)
1703 Points ∼43% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=196, last 2 years)
3938 Points ∼100% +135%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2601 Points ∼85%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2357 Points ∼77% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2048 Points ∼67% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
2674 Points ∼88% +3%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3054 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2495 - 2674, n=7)
2600 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (677 - 5301, n=196, last 2 years)
2845 Points ∼93% +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1785 Points ∼37%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1856 Points ∼39% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1273 Points ∼26% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1897 Points ∼39% +6%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3666 Points ∼76% +105%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1729 - 1897, n=7)
1830 Points ∼38% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13121, n=240, last 2 years)
4809 Points ∼100% +169%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1633 Points ∼25%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1768 Points ∼27% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1142 Points ∼17% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1765 Points ∼27% +8%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3872 Points ∼59% +137%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1633 - 1765, n=7)
1696 Points ∼26% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=240, last 2 years)
6610 Points ∼100% +305%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2644 Points ∼83%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2146 Points ∼67% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2032 Points ∼63% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
2778 Points ∼87% +5%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3091 Points ∼97% +17%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2644 - 2778, n=7)
2697 Points ∼84% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=238, last 2 years)
3202 Points ∼100% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1408 Points ∼55%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1168 Points ∼46% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
863 Points ∼34% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1463 Points ∼57% +4%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2476 Points ∼97% +76%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1400 - 1463, n=7)
1419 Points ∼55% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=194, last 2 years)
2565 Points ∼100% +82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1246 Points ∼47%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1074 Points ∼40% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
738 Points ∼28% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1264 Points ∼47% +1%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2346 Points ∼88% +88%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1237 - 1268, n=7)
1251 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=194, last 2 years)
2675 Points ∼100% +115%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2578 Points ∼84%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2351 Points ∼77% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2031 Points ∼66% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
2654 Points ∼86% +3%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3071 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2493 - 2654, n=7)
2581 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=194, last 2 years)
2860 Points ∼93% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1430 Points ∼36%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1176 Points ∼30% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
867 Points ∼22% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1453 Points ∼37% +2%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2587 Points ∼66% +81%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1411 - 1453, n=7)
1432 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11528, n=244, last 2 years)
3936 Points ∼100% +175%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1267 Points ∼26%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1081 Points ∼22% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
736 Points ∼15% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1253 Points ∼26% -1%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2471 Points ∼51% +95%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1243 - 1270, n=7)
1261 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 19364, n=244, last 2 years)
4838 Points ∼100% +282%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2603 Points ∼81%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2164 Points ∼67% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2109 Points ∼66% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
2811 Points ∼88% +8%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3093 Points ∼96% +19%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2603 - 2811, n=7)
2691 Points ∼84% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=244, last 2 years)
3212 Points ∼100% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1426 Points ∼59%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1123 Points ∼47% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
954 Points ∼40% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1432 Points ∼60% 0%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2332 Points ∼97% +64%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1391 - 1434, n=6)
1423 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=173, last 2 years)
2401 Points ∼100% +68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1271 Points ∼48%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
997 Points ∼38% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
839 Points ∼32% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1255 Points ∼47% -1%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2256 Points ∼85% +77%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1234 - 1285, n=6)
1266 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=173, last 2 years)
2658 Points ∼100% +109%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2488 Points ∼94%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2276 Points ∼86% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2098 Points ∼79% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
2456 Points ∼93% -1%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2646 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1567 - 2513, n=6)
2313 Points ∼87% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1567 - 3958, n=173, last 2 years)
2576 Points ∼97% +4%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
719 Points ∼22%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
385 Points ∼12% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
428 Points ∼13% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
721 Points ∼22% 0%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
980 Points ∼30% +36%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (706 - 736, n=6)
720 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=172, last 2 years)
3282 Points ∼100% +356%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
717 Points ∼21%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
426 Points ∼13% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
717 Points ∼21% 0%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
976 Points ∼29% +36%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (698 - 732, n=6)
716 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=170, last 2 years)
3370 Points ∼100% +370%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
181 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
116 Points ∼12% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
186 Points ∼19% +3%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
293 Points ∼29% +62%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (181 - 186, n=5)
182.4 Points ∼18% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=124, last 2 years)
1000 Points ∼100% +452%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
180 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
117 Points ∼12% -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
181 Points ∼19% +1%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
288 Points ∼29% +60%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (178 - 181, n=5)
179.8 Points ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=121, last 2 years)
978 Points ∼100% +443%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
40 fps ∼59%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
51 fps ∼76% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
33 fps ∼49% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
41 fps ∼61% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (40 - 41, n=4)
40.3 fps ∼60% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.5 - 143, n=204, last 2 years)
67.4 fps ∼100% +69%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
45 fps ∼34%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
34 fps ∼25% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
24 fps ∼18% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
46 fps ∼34% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (45 - 46, n=4)
45.8 fps ∼34% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 428, n=204, last 2 years)
133.7 fps ∼100% +197%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
22 fps ∼40%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
33 fps ∼61% +50%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
28 fps ∼51% +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
23 fps ∼42% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (22 - 23, n=4)
22.5 fps ∼41% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 121, n=203, last 2 years)
54.5 fps ∼100% +148%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
25 fps ∼33%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
21 fps ∼27% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
16 fps ∼21% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
25 fps ∼33% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (25 - 25, n=4)
25 fps ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.4 - 251, n=204, last 2 years)
76.8 fps ∼100% +207%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
14 fps ∼33%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
26 fps ∼62% +86%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
19 fps ∼45% +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
14 fps ∼33% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (8.7 - 14, n=4)
11.4 fps ∼27% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 121, n=203, last 2 years)
42.1 fps ∼100% +201%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼31%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps ∼25% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
9.4 fps ∼18% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
16 fps ∼31% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (14 - 16, n=4)
15 fps ∼29% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 169, n=204, last 2 years)
51.9 fps ∼100% +224%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.5 fps ∼32%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
14 fps ∼53% +65%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
11 fps ∼42% +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
8.8 fps ∼33% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (8.2 - 8.8, n=4)
8.58 fps ∼32% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 81, n=203, last 2 years)
26.5 fps ∼100% +212%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.6 fps ∼31%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7.3 fps ∼23% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
6 fps ∼19% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
9 fps ∼29% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (9 - 9.6, n=4)
9.38 fps ∼30% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=203, last 2 years)
31.4 fps ∼100% +227%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.4 fps ∼29%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps ∼45% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
11 fps ∼38% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
8.5 fps ∼29% +1%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +245%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (8.4 - 18, n=7)
10.4 fps ∼36% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 98, n=259, last 2 years)
27.9 fps ∼96% +232%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.6 fps ∼29%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
8.6 fps ∼26% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
6.2 fps ∼19% -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
9.7 fps ∼29% +1%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
18 fps ∼54% +88%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (8 - 9.7, n=7)
9.39 fps ∼28% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2 - 257, n=260, last 2 years)
33.4 fps ∼100% +248%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5.4 fps ∼28%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
9.2 fps ∼48% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
7 fps ∼37% +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
5.5 fps ∼29% +2%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
18 fps ∼94% +233%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (5.4 - 12, n=7)
7.33 fps ∼38% +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=260, last 2 years)
19.1 fps ∼100% +254%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.5 fps ∼27%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2.8 fps ∼22% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2.2 fps ∼17% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
3.5 fps ∼27% 0%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6.5 fps ∼50% +86%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (3.1 - 3.5, n=7)
3.4 fps ∼26% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 101, n=260, last 2 years)
12.9 fps ∼100% +269%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
191865 Points ∼35%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
198290 Points ∼36% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (191865 - 231224, n=2)
211545 Points ∼38% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1041980, n=102, last 2 years)
550205 Points ∼100% +187%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
171116 Points ∼48%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
174623 Points ∼49% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
119981 Points ∼33% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
177574 Points ∼49% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (171116 - 177574, n=2)
174345 Points ∼49% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (77514 - 727247, n=143, last 2 years)
358778 Points ∼100% +110%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5912 Points ∼9%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
15830 Points ∼25% +168%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4453 Points ∼7% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
7145 Points ∼11% +21%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (5912 - 7145, n=3)
6369 Points ∼10% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=121, last 2 years)
63547 Points ∼100% +975%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2229 Points ∼54%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2243 Points ∼54% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1637 Points ∼40% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
2374 Points ∼57% +7%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2138 - 2374, n=4)
2257 Points ∼55% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (895 - 8124, n=180, last 2 years)
4141 Points ∼100% +86%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4366 Points ∼59%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
4275 Points ∼58% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
3345 Points ∼46% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
4773 Points ∼65% +9%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (4353 - 5010, n=4)
4626 Points ∼63% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1542 - 19657, n=180, last 2 years)
7351 Points ∼100% +68%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2691 Points ∼56%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2976 Points ∼62% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1836 Points ∼38% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
3085 Points ∼65% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2536 - 3085, n=4)
2787 Points ∼58% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1012 - 9044, n=180, last 2 years)
4782 Points ∼100% +78%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1838 Points ∼26%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1876 Points ∼27% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1263 Points ∼18% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1849 Points ∼26% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1811 - 1849, n=4)
1836 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (478 - 25642, n=180, last 2 years)
7035 Points ∼100% +283%
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G31
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1143 Points ∼83%
Motorola Moto G30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1176 Points ∼86% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
947 Points ∼69% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4076
1183 Points ∼86% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1028 - 1198, n=4)
1138 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=180, last 2 years)
1373 Points ∼100% +20%

摩托罗拉Moto G31在浏览网页时表现出色,它通常能在浏览器基准测试中达到最高位置。在加载网站和检索照片时,你必须忍受轻微的延迟,但是这款智能手机在这方面做得相当好。

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Smartphone
93.6 pt ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
53.1 pt ∼53%
Motorola Moto G31
51.9 pt ∼52%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
51.4 pt ∼51%
Motorola Moto G30
48.1 pt ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
26.7 pt ∼27%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=177, last 2 years)
60 Points ∼100% +92%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97)
31.19 Points ∼52%
Motorola Moto G30 (Chrome89)
30.85 Points ∼51% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021 (Chrome96)
30.77 Points ∼51% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (29.2 - 31.3, n=5)
30.5 Points ∼51% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
21.24 Points ∼35% -32%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=184, last 2 years)
111.5 Points ∼100% +95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021 (Chrome96)
58.9 Points ∼53% +3%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97)
57.2 Points ∼51%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (53.9 - 58.9, n=4)
56.6 Points ∼51% -1%
Motorola Moto G30 (Chrome89)
49.63 Points ∼45% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
32.46 Points ∼29% -43%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=162, last 2 years)
59.4 runs/min ∼100% +113%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021 (Chrome96)
27.9 runs/min ∼47% 0%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chome 97)
27.9 runs/min ∼47%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (27 - 27.9, n=4)
27.7 runs/min ∼47% -1%
Motorola Moto G30 (Chrome89)
27.6 runs/min ∼46% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
16.3 runs/min ∼27% -42%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=189, last 2 years)
90 Points ∼100% +100%
Motorola Moto G30 (Chrome89)
51 Points ∼57% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021 (Chrome96)
47 Points ∼52% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (43 - 47, n=5)
45.2 Points ∼50% 0%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97)
45 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
38 Points ∼42% -16%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=193, last 2 years)
22261 Points ∼100% +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021 (Chrome96)
12554 Points ∼56% +8%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (10299 - 12937, n=4)
11847 Points ∼53% +2%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97)
11597 Points ∼52%
Motorola Moto G30 (Chrome89)
9879 Points ∼44% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
5849 Points ∼26% -50%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F (Chrome96)
8472 ms * ∼100% -144%
Motorola Moto G30 (Chrome89)
4650 ms * ∼55% -34%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (3464 - 3939, n=5)
3650 ms * ∼43% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021 (Chrome96)
3475 ms * ∼41% -0%
Motorola Moto G31 (Chrome 97)
3469 ms * ∼41%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=195, last 2 years)
3271 ms * ∼39% +6%

* ... smaller is better

通过eMMC闪存,Moto手机配备了目前智能手机中使用的最慢的存储类型。这在这个价格区间也很常见,相比之下,Moto G31在这里实现了相当体面的传输速率。然而,诺基亚G50诺基亚G50显示了当它使用更快的UFS存储类型时,系统感觉是多么的顺畅。

Motorola Moto G31Motorola Moto G30Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127FXiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021Nokia G50Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
15%
-33%
-15%
89%
-34%
104%
Sequential Read 256KB
309.8
214.5
-31%
302.3
-2%
309.4
0%
515
66%
273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=186)
-12%
897 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=259, last 2 years)
190%
Sequential Write 256KB
221.5
190.2
-14%
74.5
-66%
159.7
-28%
486.6
120%
176.3 ?(40 - 274, n=186)
-20%
435 ?(11.9 - 1465, n=259, last 2 years)
96%
Random Read 4KB
84
247.4
195%
77.8
-7%
73.6
-12%
182
117%
58.8 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=186)
-30%
159.3 ?(13.5 - 325, n=259, last 2 years)
90%
Random Write 4KB
109.8
12.2
-89%
47.21
-57%
88.9
-19%
166.5
52%
30.7 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=186)
-72%
151.6 ?(269 - 449, n=260, last 2 years)
38%

游戏 - 勉强可以达到60 fps

真正的60帧游戏在Moto G31上几乎是不可能的。即使是像Armajet这样要求不高的动作游戏,也倾向于在55帧运行。在《PUBG Mobile》中,高细节下的帧率下降到30帧,在低设置下达到40帧左右。我们用GameBench的工具测量了帧率。.

因此,你绝对可以顺利地运行游戏,但你应该避免在帧率方面有过高的期望。使用位置传感器和触摸屏的控制方法工作可靠。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø55.1 (41-59)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.8.0: Ø39.9 (39-41)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.8.0: Ø29.9 (27-31)

排放 - 没有东西会发热

温度

即使在长时间的负载下,智能手机的表面温度也不会过高,这意味着只有在室外温度极高的情况下才可能出现问题。

3DMark压力测试显示,即使在长时间的高负荷状态下,性能也不会下降。得分基本与那些小米Redmi Note 8 2021配备了相同的SoC。

Max. Load
 38.2 °C34.6 °C32.3 °C 
 37.8 °C34.6 °C32.3 °C 
 37.3 °C34.2 °C32.3 °C 
Maximum: 38.2 °C
Average: 34.8 °C
31.9 °C34 °C39.2 °C
32.3 °C33.6 °C37.8 °C
33 °C33.8 °C37 °C
Maximum: 39.2 °C
Average: 34.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.5 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Moto G30
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.7 (386min) % ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 (4.32min) % ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 (4.31min) % ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.2 (2.57min) % ∼99% 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Moto G31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.9 (1.086min) % ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.3 (1.081min) % ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
96.1 (0.701min) % ∼97% -3%
00.20.40.70.91.11.31.51.722.22.42.62.833.33.53.73.94.1Tooltip
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.091 (1.086-1.099)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø0.708 (0.701-0.73)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø1.093 (1.081-1.1)
Motorola Moto G31 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.33 (4.31-4.34)
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.59 (2.57-2.59)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.33 (4.32-4.35)
热图--正面
热图--正面
热图-背面
热图-背面

演讲者

与前代产品一样,Moto G31的声音非常强调中音,即使在最大音量下,也能防止高音在耳朵里发出令人不快的声音。与其他一些经济型智能手机相比,它的声音更温暖、更平衡,但自然与真正伟大的智能手机扬声器相去甚远。最大音量也太低了。

使用3.5毫米音频插孔和蓝牙的声音输出没有问题。所有最新的aptX编解码器都可用于无线音频播放。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040452532.434.93127.626.74029.930.55034.935.3632727.98017.821.810014.222.312513.32916010.236.12008.842.72509.648.53157.351.74007.354.85009.261.763012.962.180017.362.9100012.969.7125010.967.716009.772200010.267.6250011.665.731501370.1400013.968.7500015.266.8630015.770.2800015.873.41000017.166.51250016.163.71600016.658.2SPL25.880.7N0.748.5median 12.9median 63.7Delta2.88.74340.836.835.836.831.930.635.23432.92927.625.521.229.320.923.922.214.234.811.34111.748.29.754.39.356.511.861.613.76217.363.916.271.211.171.510.37410.47211.67012.668.513.963.715.272.515.671.416.370.316.567.916.466.417.153.671.426.482.226.50.851median 13.9median 63.92.411hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G31Motorola Moto G30
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G31 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto G30 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 - 几乎没有其他手机的充电速度这么慢

能源消耗

Moto G31在最大负荷下的能耗方面要求很高。否则,这款手机是相当节俭的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.7 / 0.9 / 1.3 Watt
Load midlight 3.5 / 8.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto G31
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G30
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
4000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G85
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-38%
-50%
-29%
-38%
-36%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.8
-14%
1.4
-100%
0.8
-14%
0.968 ?(0.7 - 1.7, n=5)
-38%
0.915 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=205, last 2 years)
-31%
Idle Average *
0.9
1.5
-67%
1.9
-111%
1.3
-44%
1.674 ?(0.9 - 2.9, n=5)
-86%
1.704 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=205, last 2 years)
-89%
Idle Maximum *
1.3
1.8
-38%
2.1
-62%
2.1
-62%
2.04 ?(1.3 - 3, n=5)
-57%
1.931 ?(0.69 - 4, n=205, last 2 years)
-49%
Load Average *
3.5
6.1
-74%
3.8
-9%
5
-43%
4.45 ?(3.5 - 5.3, n=5)
-27%
4.46 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=205, last 2 years)
-27%
Load Maximum *
8.5
8.4
1%
5.6
34%
6.9
19%
7 ?(6.11 - 8.5, n=5)
18%
7.33 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=205, last 2 years)
14%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
: Ø6.28 (3.53-10.1)

Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)