Notebookcheck Logo
联想 Tab One 平板电脑评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）

100 美元以下的小巧Android 平板电脑评测 - 联想 Tab One 评测

家庭平板电脑

联想 Tab One 几乎是一款不费吹灰之力的产品。这款价格实惠的Android 平板电脑配有 GPS，边框较小，还可以选择手机。联想 Tab 通过 microSD 和 3.5 毫米插孔扩展内存，价格低廉，尺寸小巧，是儿童的理想平板电脑选择。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Touchscreen Tablet

关于联想 Tab One 的结论

在我们的评测中，联想 Tab One 给人留下了深刻印象，它是一款小巧轻便的入门级平板电脑，塑料外壳做工精良，设计现代，边框比 iPad Mini 小得多。就 100 美元左右的价格而言，其规格也令人印象深刻。即使是大多数中档平板电脑，也没有提供手机选项和 GPS 跟踪功能以及 3.5 毫米插孔。

软件基础是最新的Android 15，制造商规定支持长达七年的更新，但后者在法律上仍不明确。Helio G85 的性能也给未来留下了一些问号。简单的应用可以令人满意地完成，但要求更高的任务和游戏就不是 Tab One 的强项了。

如果你喜欢低音效果好、电池续航时间长的扬声器，那么你也应该看看中档价位的小巧平板电脑。不过，联想平板电脑尤其适合儿童使用。Tab One 提供的功能远远超出了最初的价格。

Pros

+ 良好的规格（3.5 毫米插孔、内存扩展......）
+ LTE 选项
+ 无线局域网版本有 GPS
+ 良好的制造质量
+ 现代设计
+ 屏幕无闪烁

Cons

- 蹩脚的 eMMC 内存
- 基础版仅 64GB
- 薄弱的 SoC
- 像素密度低
- 充电慢

联想 Tab One 的价格和上市时间

这款入门级平板电脑有多种捆绑包，直接从制造商和亚马逊等网上商店购买的起价约为 100 美元。

Amazon Logo
$109.99
Lenovo Tab One - Lightweight Tablet - up to 12.5 Hours of YouTube Streaming - 8.7" HD Display - 4 GB Memory - 64 GB Storage - MediaTek Helio G85 - Includes Folio Case

联想为 Tab One 设定了一个年轻的目标群体。通过谷歌儿童空间（Google Kids Space），为儿童提供了一个学习和娱乐的环境，而 8.7 英寸的小巧机身也能让小手很好地使用 Tab One，并能舒适地放入书包或儿童背包中。此外，联想还提供了专门的儿童保护套，提供全面的保护，类似于亚马逊的 Fire Kids Pro.

联想 Tab One 的规格

Lenovo Tab One
Processor
Mediatek Helio G85 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G52 MP2
Memory
4 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
8.70 inch 5:3, 1340 x 800 pixel 179 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, TFT LCD (IPS), 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 46 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3,5 mm jack, Card Reader: up to 1TB microSD, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer sensor, Hall sensor, proximity sensor, OTG, Miracast, UKW Radio
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, GSM: 850/900/1800/1900MHz UMTS: B1/2/4/5/6/8/19 FDD LTE: B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28(a+b)/66 TDD LTE: B38/40/41, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 211 x 124.8
Battery
5100 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0, AF)
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix (f/2.2, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, USB cable, charger, Quick Start, ZUI, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
320 g
Price
100 Euro
Amazon
$109.99
Links
Lenovo homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

保护套 -Android- 尺寸小巧的平板电脑

联想 Tab One 的颜色选择
联想 Tab One 的颜色选择

联想 Tab One 采用塑料外壳，但丝毫没有廉价感。制造质量很好，没有理由抱怨。

这款入门级平板电脑采用超薄一体成型设计，重量仅为 320 克，也适合儿童使用。对外壳的按压和扭转尝试不会导致显示屏的液晶出现屏幕误差，即使对面板施加强大的压力也不会造成波纹效应。

屏幕边框非常小，给人一种现代感。联想 Tab One 的屏占比高达 82%，其外观甚至明显优于更昂贵的 iPad Mini (2024)只有 77% 左右。不过，这款入门级平板电脑没有获得官方的 IP 认证。

尺寸比较

❌
211.6 mm 125.5 mm 8.8 mm 373 g211 mm 124.8 mm 8.5 mm 320 g208.54 mm 129.46 mm 7.79 mm 350 g208.2 mm 129.6 mm 7.9 mm 335 g205.13 mm 132.03 mm 6.46 mm 326 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

功能 - 带 3.5 毫米插孔的小型平板电脑

联想平板电脑有两个版本，每个版本都配备慢速 eMMC 5.1 内存，容量分别为 64 GB 和 128 GB。不过，在评测期间，大容量版本还没有上市。

使用 microSD 卡可以轻松扩展内置内存，但只支持容量高达 1 TB 的卡。除了 SD 卡插槽外，WWAN 型号还有一个用于移动互联网的 nano-SIM 卡插槽。

入门级平板电脑有一个 3.5 毫米耳机插孔和一个 USB 2.0 端口，但只能进行慢速数据传输，不支持视频输出。联想平板电脑还支持蓝牙 5.3 和用于无线屏幕镜像的 Miracast，并提供调频收音机。

偏心旋转质量（ERM）也值得一提。不过，触觉反馈的质量不高，震动是海绵状的，而且不精确。联想 Tab One 缺少的是用于移动支付的 NFC 功能和红外爆破器，这限制了这款小巧平板电脑的某些使用场景。

上外壳侧（扬声器）
上外壳侧（扬声器）
外壳下侧（3.5 毫米插孔、扬声器、USB 端口、麦克风）
外壳下侧（3.5 毫米插孔、扬声器、USB 端口、麦克风）
机壳右侧（按钮：音量、开关）
机壳右侧（按钮：音量、开关）
机壳左侧（卡槽）
机壳左侧（卡槽）

microSD 读卡器

我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考存储卡测量了内置卡槽的速度。我们获得了近 44 MB/s 的良好传输速率，在 CPDT 基准测试中仅有少量下降。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Tab One
Mediatek Helio G85 (Angelbird V60)
43.6 MB/s
Average of class Tablet
  (10.2 - 58.4, n=61, last 2 years)
36.1 MB/s -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85 (Angelbird V60)
34.4 MB/s -21%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
10.23 MB/s -77%

跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Lenovo Tab One Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.2 (24.4-49.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36 (19.5-46.3)
Lenovo Tab One Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.1 (13-84.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø68.8 (13.6-78)

软件 - 更新供应不明确的联想 Tab One

根据联想，软件支持保证到 2027 年 3 月，但 Tab One 也被列入欧盟能源标签 (EPREL) -七年。.不过，这并不意味着联想有义务在欧洲提供七年的新更新。联想对欧盟法规的解释有些不同，即制造商只有在计划更新的情况下才必须提供更新。

在评测过程中，Tab One 使用的是基于Android 15 的 ZUI 和 2025 年 6 月的补丁，这已经是相当新的了。用户界面支持多任务处理，允许多个应用程序在窗口中相邻运行，还支持任务栏。

联想 Tab One 测试平板电脑
联想 Tab One 测试平板电脑
联想 Tab One 测试平板电脑
联想 Tab One 测试平板电脑

可持续性

经 EPREL 数据库认证，这款入门级平板电脑的可修复性非常好。Tab One 在这方面达到了最高等级 A。在欧洲，七年内备件的供应（理论上）也是有规定的。

联想 Tab One 的包装不含塑料。不过，没有关于二氧化碳排放量或所用材料的信息。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 GPS 和 4G 功能的经济型平板电脑

这款入门级平板电脑通过带有 1x1 天线的 WiFi 5 进行无线通信，这意味着只使用了一根发射和接收天线，因此最大数据传输速率和信号强度受到限制。

与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器配合使用，Tab One 的传输速率稳定在平均每秒 300 到 350 MBit 左右。对于这个价位的产品来说，这当然是可以接受的，但如果用户的网络连接速度非常快，就无法充分发挥其潜力。

Tab One 可通过内置麦克风拨打电话。不过，只有选配的 LTE 版本才能通话。

Networking
Lenovo Tab One
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
280 (min: 215) MBit/s ∼32%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
357 (min: 225) MBit/s ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
867 (min: 734) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1657 (min: 1343) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
578 (min: 420) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1539 (min: 1420) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
246 (min: 171) MBit/s ∼28%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
369 (min: 338) MBit/s ∼22%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
808 (min: 402) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
737 (min: 358) MBit/s ∼44%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
343 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
329 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼20%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
543 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
599 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1222 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1409 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼92%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850Tooltip
Lenovo Tab One 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø280 (215-295)
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø794 (402-871)
Lenovo Tab One 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø357 (225-384)
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø724 (358-766)
选择参加试验的卫星
选择参加试验的卫星

联想的这款经济实惠的平板电脑还提供 WLAN 版本的 GPS 跟踪功能。Tab One 使用主要的卫星系统：单频 GPS、GLONASS、Galileo 和北斗。带 WWAN 的型号（TB305XU）还配备了 A-GPS，定位速度更快。在我们的评测中，可供选择的系统比较有限，无法使用 SBAS 进行更精确的跟踪。

集成的 GNSS 模块在我们的 GPS 测试中取得了不错的成绩，尽管平板电脑需要很长时间才能建立卫星定位。虽然跟踪并不总是完美的，但与我们路线的偏差很小，在日常使用中几乎不会造成干扰。在测试路线中，Tab One 的结果与 Garmin Venu 2 相似。

定位 Garmin Venu 2
定位 Garmin Venu 2
联想 Tab One 所在位置
联想 Tab One 所在位置

摄像头 - 配备自动对焦功能的联想 Tab One

用 Tab One 拍出烧焦的自拍照
用 Tab One 拍出烧焦的自拍照

联想 Tab One 的摄像头功能非常基本，这也是 100 美元平板电脑的应有之义。200 万像素的前置摄像头内置在显示屏上方的边框中，只能进行固定对焦，主要适用于简单的视频通话。视频可以高清质量拍摄，而背面的主摄像头最大支持 1080p。

主摄像头像素为 800 万像素，分辨率也不是很高，但至少有自动对焦功能。不过，对焦速度非常慢，导致拍照有点迟缓，拍摄对象很快就会模糊。

在图像质量方面，我们对动态范围和整体细节感到遗憾。不过，主摄像头适合拍摄文档照片。我们对色彩准确性的分析也没有发现什么值得批评的地方，色彩整体上显得比较均衡。

1x
1x
2x
2x
4 倍（最大值）
4 倍（最大值）
联想 Tab One 测试平板电脑
联想 Tab One 测试平板电脑
联想 Tab One 测试平板电脑
联想 Tab One 测试平板电脑

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Motiv 1Motiv 2Low Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
9 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
4 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Tab One: 7.37 ∆E min: 2.85 - max: 11.89 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
62.9 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
28 ∆E
65.4 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
76.5 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
90.9 ∆E
70.2 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Tab One: 46.84 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 90.94 ∆E

配件和保修 -Android- 平板电脑，带欧洲境外供电装置

联想 Tab One 的对开保护套
联想 Tab One 的对开保护套
联想 Tab One 的保护壳
联想 Tab One 的保护壳

在德语国家，联想平板电脑的包装不包括充电器。在美国，包装盒内有电源适配器。Tab One 的可选保护套（防撞保护套、透明保护套、对开保护套）必须单独购买。

入门级平板电脑还有各种捆绑包，其中包括保护套和/或电源装置。除此之外，包装中还包括一条 USB 2.0 线缆和一份快速入门指南以及安全和保修信息。

联想为 Tab One 提供了不同的保修条件，可以是 "自带"，也可以是快递服务。根据数据表，保修期从一年到三年不等。

输入设备和操作 - 无指纹传感器的紧凑型平板电脑

在面部识别方面，只能通过前置摄像头进行不安全的二维识别。遗憾的是，没有指纹识别传感器。

我们无法确定触摸屏的更大延迟时间。不过 联发科芯片组在日常使用中经常会超负荷，Tab One 会出现卡顿和停顿，例如在纵向和横向格式之间切换时。由于刷新率只有 60 Hz，动画效果也不是很流畅。

Tab One 不支持笔输入。由于没有数字转换器层，因此必须使用电容笔来处理笔记或学习应用程序。

显示屏 - 联想 Tab 没有使用 OLED 显示屏

子像素显示
子像素显示

8.7 英寸 IPS 面板仅采用 800p 分辨率，像素密度较低，不足 200 PPI。60 Hz 面板的清晰度其实并不高，仔细观察可以看到像素结构。

由于技术原因，联想没有在 Tab One 上使用脉宽调制亮度控制。因此，对脉宽调制敏感的人会对 IPS 显示屏感到满意，因为我们没有测到任何屏幕闪烁现象。根据联想的说法，LCD 还通过了 TÜV Rheinland 的低蓝光认证。

在我们的亮度测量中，5:3 屏幕在 APL18 测试中达到了最高 412 cd/m²。对于这个价位的产品来说，这个亮度还算不错，而价格明显更高的 中档竞争产品的亮度明显更高。Tab One 的亮度不足以吸引 HDR 内容。

373
cd/m²		398
cd/m²		357
cd/m²
384
cd/m²		407
cd/m²		360
cd/m²
376
cd/m²		386
cd/m²		372
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 407 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 379.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 407 cd/m²
Contrast: 1696:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.36 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
81% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.988
CCT: 6876 K
Lenovo Tab One
TFT LCD (IPS), 1340x800, 8.7"		Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
LCD, 3008x1880, 8.8"		Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
LTPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"		Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
IPS, 1340x800, 8.7"		Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
LTPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"
Screen
15%
5%
-6%
-70%
Brightness middle
407
743
83%
441
8%
499
23%
555
36%
Brightness
379
721
90%
420
11%
479
26%
523
38%
Brightness Distribution
88
94
7%
91
3%
90
2%
88
0%
Black Level *
0.24
0.5
-108%
0.5
-108%
0.37
-54%
0.46
-92%
Contrast
1696
1486
-12%
882
-48%
1349
-20%
1207
-29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.36
1.61
32%
1.08
54%
3.68
-56%
6.4
-171%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.77
3.82
51%
2.52
68%
6.82
12%
12.6
-62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
2.9
-21%
1.1
54%
1.9
21%
9.1
-279%
Gamma
1.988 111%
2.232 99%
2.19 100%
2.184 101%
2.31 95%
CCT
6876 95%
6864 95%
6655 98%
6787 96%
9616 68%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8276 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

我们使用 Calman 软件测试色彩准确度。在 "标准 "配置文件中，我们测得 sRGB 色彩空间的 DeltaE 值在目标范围内（<3）。考虑到价格区间，这一点非常令人满意。

虽然 Tab One 在饱和色方面显示出明显的弱点，但与不饱和参考色的差异只是略微明显。0.24 cd/m² 的黑色值对于入门级平板电脑来说也非常不错，对比度约为 1,700:1，非常吸引人。测量的响应时间也没有让人抱怨的理由。

色彩精确度（配置文件：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩精确度（配置文件：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：标准，目标色彩空间：Adobe RGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：标准，目标色彩空间：Adobe RGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：标准，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩空间（配置文件：标准，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩空间（配置文件：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
20.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.9 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
26.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.1 ms rise
↘ 12.1 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms).

可视角度的稳定性很好，在正常观看时几乎不会出现色彩偏差，但面板的变暗现象是显而易见的。液晶显示屏典型的亮度分布不均匀现象是存在的，但在日常使用中问题不大。

对于户外使用情况，Tab One 并不适合，但由于其峰值亮度低于 500 cd/m²，这也不足为奇。玻璃表面的反光令人讨厌，尤其是在夏天。

性能 - 配备古老处理器的联想平板电脑

内置 联发科 Helio G85几乎是 SoC 领域的老将。这款来自 2020 年的芯片组采用 12 纳米 FinFET 工艺制造，拥有两个集群的八个 CPU 内核。查看 Helio G85 的数据表可以发现，其 CPU 单元与 Helio G80完全相同。

由于只配备了 4GB 内存，Helio G85 在我们的基准软件包中的表现处于很低的水平。不过，应该指出的是，我们比较的大多数紧凑型设备都属于不同的价格联盟。

Geekbench 6.4 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2733 Points +568%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2187 Points +435%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1867 Points +356%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=99, last 2 years)
1339 Points +227%
Lenovo Tab One
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
409 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
403 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (366 - 416, n=7)
402 Points -2%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
8355 Points +483%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6591 Points +360%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
4828 Points +237%
Average of class Tablet
  (848 - 14690, n=99, last 2 years)
4229 Points +195%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1449 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab One
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1434 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1251 - 1449, n=7)
1387 Points -3%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2841845 Points +934%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1970442 Points +617%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2854581, n=66, last 2 years)
1005379 Points +266%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (274727 - 281399, n=3)
278313 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab One
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
274727 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
25683 Points +192%
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
18344 Points +109%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 27428, n=87, last 2 years)
11556 Points +32%
Lenovo Tab One
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8787 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (6596 - 9437, n=16)
8110 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7985 Points -9%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12211 Points +431%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8088 Points +252%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 13159, n=69, last 2 years)
5301 Points +131%
Lenovo Tab One
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2298 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2270 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2087 - 2422, n=8)
2263 Points -2%
System
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
13894 Points +217%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10983 Points +151%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 18343, n=69, last 2 years)
8443 Points +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4932 Points +13%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (4213 - 5010, n=8)
4580 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab One
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4383 Points
Memory
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
13183 Points +316%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
7987 Points +152%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 17963, n=69, last 2 years)
6219 Points +96%
Lenovo Tab One
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3172 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2253 - 3437, n=8)
2834 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2662 Points -16%
Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
54322 Points +2816%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
28083 Points +1407%
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=69, last 2 years)
13348 Points +616%
Lenovo Tab One
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1863 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1780 - 1960, n=8)
1845 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1810 Points -3%
Web
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2267 Points +106%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1789 Points +63%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2370, n=69, last 2 years)
1430 Points +30%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1028 - 1198, n=8)
1125 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1118 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab One
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1098 Points
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
72895 Points +1545%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
16237 Points +266%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=69, last 2 years)
13051 Points +194%
Lenovo Tab One
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4432 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (3849 - 5112, n=5)
4353 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3899 Points -12%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
49562 Points +8672%
Average of class Tablet
  (138 - 156427, n=61, last 2 years)
7119 Points +1160%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1485 Points +163%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (565 - 784, n=3)
695 Points +23%
Lenovo Tab One
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
565 Points
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.4
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1233 Points +450%
Average of class Tablet
  (211 - 1483, n=13, last 2 years)
514 Points +129%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
499 Points +123%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
439 Points +96%
Lenovo Tab One
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
224 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (n=1)
224 Points 0%
Half Precision NPU 1.4
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
8659 Points +5523%
Average of class Tablet
  (154 - 9666, n=13, last 2 years)
1717 Points +1015%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
497 Points +223%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
442 Points +187%
Lenovo Tab One
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
154 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (n=1)
154 Points 0%
Quantized NPU 1.4
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
11834 Points +13348%
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 13178, n=13, last 2 years)
2564 Points +2814%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1133 Points +1188%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1019 Points +1058%
Lenovo Tab One
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
88 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (n=1)
88 Points 0%

集成的 ARM GPU 是低性能的 Mali-G52 MP2.在 GFXBench 测试中，Tab One 在要求较高的层级测试中的帧速率只有不到 10 FPS。即使在低级测试（OpenGL 2.7）中，也无法使用面板的原生 60 Hz 折射率。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5823 Points +2856%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5012 Points +2444%
Lenovo Tab One
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
197 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
178 Points -10%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5845 Points +2837%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5088 Points +2457%
Lenovo Tab One
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
199 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points -10%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20011 Points +2672%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18627 Points +2480%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11279 Points +1462%
Lenovo Tab One
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
722 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
694 Points -4%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
165 fps +217%
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +131%
Lenovo Tab One
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
52 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
51 fps -2%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
846 fps +2015%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
533 fps +1233%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab One
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
165 fps +323%
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +208%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab One
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
398 fps +1558%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
361 fps +1404%
Lenovo Tab One
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps -8%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
160 fps +493%
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +344%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps +4%
Lenovo Tab One
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
27 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
319 fps +2179%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
269 fps +1821%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab One
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps +564%
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps +471%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab One
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
161 fps +1730%
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +1252%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.9 fps +1%
Lenovo Tab One
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.8 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps +852%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps +638%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps +448%
Lenovo Tab One
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.4 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps -4%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
125 fps +3688%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps +2082%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +1506%
Lenovo Tab One
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.3 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps -3%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
122 fps +838%
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps +777%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
72 fps +454%
Lenovo Tab One
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps -15%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
323 fps +3656%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
188 fps +2086%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
138 fps +1505%
Lenovo Tab One
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.6 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps -1%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54 fps +3757%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33 fps +2257%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps +1543%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab One
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps

在浏览器基准测试中，我们使用的是 Chrome 浏览器。在日常使用中，当滚动浏览复杂网站时，Tab One 的性能达到了稳定的数值，表现也可以接受。不过，在这款入门级平板电脑上浏览网页并不流畅。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 456, n=20, last 2 years)
191.5 Points +184%
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
134.564 Points +100%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (n=1)
67.4 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab One (Chrome 139)
67.363 Points
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU (Chrome 135)
17.6 runs/min +362%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 36.8, n=54, last 2 years)
13.7 runs/min +260%
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
9.67 runs/min +154%
Lenovo Tab One (Chrome 139)
3.81 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (3.01 - 3.81, n=3)
3.31 runs/min -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
3.11 runs/min -18%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU (Chrome 135)
165 Points +166%
Average of class Tablet (26 - 315, n=77, last 2 years)
122.9 Points +98%
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
112 Points +81%
Lenovo Tab One (Chrome 139)
62 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
59 Points -5%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (51 - 62, n=4)
57.5 Points -7%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU (Chrome 135)
70635 Points +321%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=104, last 2 years)
37127 Points +121%
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
36745 Points +119%
Lenovo Tab One (Chrome 139)
16763 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
13605 Points -19%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (10299 - 16763, n=16)
13351 Points -20%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (2486 - 3939, n=9)
3239 ms * -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
2742 ms * -10%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 27101, n=86, last 2 years)
2741 ms * -10%
Lenovo Tab One (Chrome 139)
2485.8 ms *
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad (Chrome 136)
611.6 ms * +75%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU (Chrome 135)
541.2 ms * +78%

* ... smaller is better

就速度而言，这款入门级平板电脑的内存运行速度非常低。由于采用了速度较慢的 eMMC 技术，加载时间过长也是一个问题。

Lenovo Tab OneXiaomi Redmi K PadLenovo Legion Tab TB321FUXiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inchesAlldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
467%
872%
-6%
511%
-32%
281%
Sequential Read 256KB
298.43
3448.34
1055%
3984.3
1235%
289
-3%
1996.56
569%
274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=208)
-8%
1522 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=89, last 2 years)
410%
Sequential Write 256KB
199.25
1494.45
650%
3483.56
1648%
263.6
32%
1866.05
837%
177.4 ?(40 - 274, n=208)
-11%
1118 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=89, last 2 years)
461%
Random Read 4KB
98.38
309.61
215%
355.12
261%
71.1
-28%
392.27
299%
60.2 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=208)
-39%
225 ?(20.1 - 475, n=89, last 2 years)
129%
Random Write 4KB
108.67
49.93
-54%
483.73
345%
82.7
-24%
474.41
337%
33.4 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=208)
-69%
241 ?(9.1 - 745, n=89, last 2 years)
122%

游戏 - 联想 Tab One 不是游戏平板电脑

内置 图形单元基于 Bifrost 架构，不再适合现代游戏。

Mali-G52 MP2 只能在要求苛刻的游戏中提供可玩的帧速率，如《源氏冲击》。不过，这里也会出现严重的帧数下降。对于《PUBG Mobile》，在中等细节（高清）下的帧速率约为 30 fps，图形性能足够。在低图形设置下，甚至可以达到 40 帧/秒。

使用GameBench的应用程序来测量游戏测试的精确帧率。

Geshin Impact
Geshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0510152025303540Tooltip
Lenovo Tab One; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø27 (17-35)
Lenovo Tab One; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø21 (10-27)
Lenovo Tab One; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø39.8 (34-41)
Lenovo Tab One; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.9 (27-31)

排放 - 紧凑型平板电脑，废热少

温度

虽然性能不高，但紧凑的机身并不影响散热，温度始终保持在适宜的范围内。在 3DMark 压力测试中，长时间负载阶段的性能也没有明显下降。

Max. Load
 39.7 °C36.1 °C31.8 °C 
 43.1 °C37.8 °C32.8 °C 
 42.2 °C33.4 °C32 °C 
Maximum: 43.1 °C
Average: 36.5 °C
32 °C36.1 °C40.2 °C
32.6 °C33.8 °C37.6 °C
30.5 °C32.5 °C36.9 °C
Maximum: 40.2 °C
Average: 34.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.8 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMarkSteel Nomad 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab One
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.2 %
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97.8 % -1%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.3 % -4%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.5 % -23%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.7 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.7 % 0%
Lenovo Tab One
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.3 %
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85.7 % -13%
00.20.40.70.91.11.31.51.722.22.42.62.83.13.33.53.73.94.1Tooltip
Lenovo Tab One Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø1.181 (1.169-1.19)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.083 (1.076-1.09)
Lenovo Tab One Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.35 (4.33-4.36)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.17 (4.14-4.19)

扬声器

两个支持 Dolby Atmos 的扬声器听起来还不错，但遗憾的是，声音特性中没有低音。我们的粉红噪声测量也显示中高音的频率曲线在不断上升。

有线耳机可通过 3.5 毫米插孔连接到 Tab One。另外，蓝牙 5.3 也可用于无线连接，包括多种音频编解码器选择。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.345.72538.337.63132.537.9404135.55042.944.96327.830.78019.526.110023.72712519.934.916017.540.120016.244.125014.949.63151456.240012.253.550013.457.363015.3628001766100016.274.9125015.273160014.670.7200013.471.8250011.664.4315011.560400011.867.450001277.963001275.6800012.266.11000012.269.6125001264.41600011.564.5SPL2683.7N0.754median 13.4median 64.4Delta28.64640.237.836.730.829.333.341.933.740.223.224.420.32821.837.820.448.222.253.118.559.415.262.31765.614.662.816.764.421.868.221.171.916.974.417.976.216.176.914.374.114.97116.570.518.668.222.870.223.471.623.671.22072.918.966.619.166.231.884.61.562.4median 18.6median 68.22.84.645.948.540.639.834.834.134.434.937.839.127.730.318.422.921.22524.429.923.637.722.444.819.550.519.856.614.458.812.863.814.265.813.169.412.474.610.777.910.877.110.572.111.271.911.770.412.266.511.96712.174.612.277.112.176.811.863.511.453.62585.60.762.3median 12.2median 66.52.69.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Tab OneXiaomi Redmi K PadXiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Tab One audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi K Pad audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 小平板，大电池

能耗

与 小米红米 Pad SE 8.7的 Helio G85Tab One 的工作效率较低。我们的 GFXbench 测量显示功耗很高，尤其是图形处理器。闲置模式下的功耗也相当高，超过 3 瓦。

锂离子电池的最大充电功率为 15 瓦。只需 2 个小时，5100 毫安时的储能电池就能用 小米 25000 - 不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.2 / 2.6 / 3.7 Watt
Load midlight 5 / 7.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Tab One
5100 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
7500 mAh		Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
6550 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
6650 mAh		Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
7300 mAh		Average Mediatek Helio G85
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
-64%
5%
41%
-12%
29%
-39%
Idle Minimum *
2.2
3.9
-77%
1.4
36%
0.9
59%
1.36
38%
1.171 ?(0.7 - 2.2, n=9)
47%
2.01 ?(0.63 - 5.6, n=81, last 2 years)
9%
Idle Average *
2.6
4.3
-65%
1.9
27%
1.2
54%
4.16
-60%
1.719 ?(0.9 - 2.9, n=9)
34%
3.75 ?(1 - 9.2, n=81, last 2 years)
-44%
Idle Maximum *
3.7
4.9
-32%
2.6
30%
1.7
54%
4.21
-14%
2.18 ?(1.3 - 3.7, n=9)
41%
4.09 ?(1.3 - 9.5, n=81, last 2 years)
-11%
Load Average *
5
9.4
-88%
6.6
-32%
3.5
30%
4.35 ?(3.5 - 5.3, n=9)
13%
9.19 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=77, last 2 years)
-84%
Load Maximum *
7.7
12.1
-57%
10.4
-35%
6.9
10%
7.06 ?(6.11 - 8.5, n=9)
8%
12.8 ?(4.6 - 41.6, n=77, last 2 years)
-66%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Lenovo Tab One Mediatek Helio G85; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.69 (1.961-7.68)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mediatek Helio G85; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.2 (0.924-6.92)
Lenovo Tab One Mediatek Helio G85; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2 (1.888-2.56)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mediatek Helio G85; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.067 (0.896-1.612)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Lenovo Tab One Mediatek Helio G85; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.44 (4.18-5.03)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mediatek Helio G85; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.74 (2.15-3.5)
Lenovo Tab One Mediatek Helio G85; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2 (1.888-2.56)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mediatek Helio G85; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.067 (0.896-1.612)

电池寿命

电池续航时间还算稳定，但由于容量只有 5100 毫安时，这款 8.7 英寸平板电脑不太可能连续运行。不过，在我们的 WLAN 测试中，这款廉价平板电脑取得了不错的成绩，仅用了 14 个小时，而在无休止的视频播放中则用了 16 个小时。因此，Tab One 的续航时间绝非问题。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
37h 34min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 52min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 17min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 44min
Lenovo Tab One
5100 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
7500 mAh		Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
6550 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
6650 mAh		Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
7300 mAh
Battery Runtime
44%
6%
21%
15%
Reader / Idle
2254
2654
18%
2236
-1%
H.264
977
1211
24%
1268
30%
WiFi v1.3
832
1197
44%
1038
25%
1222
47%
953
15%
Load
284
156
-45%
302
6%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

联想 Tab One 是一款时尚且价格实惠的平板电脑，是进入平板电脑世界的理想之选。关于更新支持的误导性信息有点令人遗憾。

Lenovo Tab One - 08/27/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
81 / 98 → 82%
Keyboard
69 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
40 / 69 → 57%
Weight
86 / 40-88 → 96%
Battery
90%
Display
81%
Games Performance
3 / 65 → 5%
Application Performance
45 / 92 → 49%
AI Performance
8%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
71 / 91 → 78%
Camera
50 / 90 → 56%
Average
60%
77%
Tablet - Weighted Average

可比较的替代品

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
77.4%
Lenovo Tab One
Lenovo Tab One
Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC		Amazon: $109.99
List Price: 100€		320 g64 GB eMMC Flash8.70"
1340x800
179 PPI
TFT LCD (IPS)
2.
90.2%
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $224.00
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Only WiFi...
2. $249.50
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve...
3. $11.89
for Xiaomi Redmi K Pad Andro...
List Price: 330€		326 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash8.80"
3008x1880
403 PPI
LCD
3.
86.5%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $8.99
Callyue Case for Lenovo Legi...
2. $12.99
Bkinew Clear Case for 2025 L...
3. $11.49
elitegadget Case for Lenovo ...
List Price: 599€		350 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash8.80"
2560x1600
343 PPI
LTPS
4.
76.8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC		Amazon:
List Price: 150€		373 g64 GB eMMC Flash8.70"
1340x800
179 PPI
IPS
5.
84%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 732 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $209.99
ALLDOCUBE iPlay 70 mini Pro ...
2. $19.99
[2025 New Version] ALLDOCUBE...
3. $13.99
Qiawum Case for Alldocube ip...
List Price: 400€		335 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash8.80"
2560x1600
343 PPI
LTPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 100 美元以下的小巧Android 平板电脑评测 - 联想 Tab One 评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-09- 1 (Update: 2025-09- 1)