判决
SamsungGalaxy A06 的塑料外壳相当坚固，设计合理，配备指纹传感器，屏幕亮度约为 500 cd/m²，无 PWM 闪烁，续航时间可满足一天的使用需求。
遗憾的是，它也有一些不足之处：没有用于无线支付的 NFC 功能，性能并不总能满足流畅运行的要求，而且屏幕上的彩色显示屏还会偏蓝。
摄像头在快速抓拍时表现尚可，但在拍摄时自动对焦功能往往不堪重负。
至少，三星还为这款价格实惠的智能手机提供了Android 16 和直至 2029 年的安全更新。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在德国，您可以在亚马逊网站（amazon.de）上购买三星Galaxy A06，价格不到 90 欧元（约合 105 美元）。
规格
外壳和设备 - 坚固的塑料
预算仅为 90 欧元（约合 105 美元），即使是三星公司也无法施展魔法。不过，Galaxy A06 采用了相对坚固的塑料外壳，边框为金属外观，背面略带纹理和反光。
这款智能手机有深蓝、白、黄和浅蓝四种颜色可供选择。
我们的机型配备 4GB RAM 和 64GB 大容量存储空间。根据国家的不同，也有配备 6GB RAM 和/或 128GB 大容量存储空间的机型。遗憾的是，Galaxy A06 不支持 NFC，因此无法进行非接触式支付。不过，该机型安装了 Samsung Pay，在某些国家可以通过二维码进行支付。
您可以同时使用两张 SIM 卡，也可以插入 microSD 卡。读卡器的工作速度一般。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A05s (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto G05 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A06 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi A3 (Angelbird V60) | |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
通信和操作 -Galaxy A06 作为 LTE 手机
WiFi 5 是 WLAN 的最快标准，我们的测试设备达到了每秒 250 - 350 MBit 的速度。虽然数据传输速率不时降至 200 MBit/s，但连接也相对稳定。
在这款价格低廉的手机上，您必须使用 5G 技术，而在 4G 范围内，您必须检查在国外旅行时是否可以使用移动互联网：许多频率都不支持。
由于 SoC 运行速度相对较慢，在使用设备时总会出现等待时间长、反应慢的情况，但触摸屏能准确识别触摸。
待机键上集成了指纹传感器，稍候即可解锁手机。还可以通过前置摄像头进行人脸识别，而且效果很好。
| Networking | |
| Samsung Galaxy A06 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A05s | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G05 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi A3 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
软件和可持续性--更新承诺
三星Galaxy A06 实际交付时的操作系统是Android 14，但现在已更新至Android 15。这必须从三星的更新承诺中扣除，但考虑到有些手机从未获得过一次Android OS 版本更新，在这个价格范围内，这仍然是一个不错的提议。你仍然可以期待 Andorid 16 和总共四年的安全更新，即直到 2029 年。
尽管价格低廉，但包装却不含塑料。三星通常会为个人用户提供各种维修手册和备件，但Galaxy A06 在欧洲的相关数据库中却没有任何相关信息。
相机 - 价格低廉，性能尚可
你不能指望 100 欧元（约合 116 美元）以下的手机配备顶级摄像头，但Galaxy A06 的主摄像头至少在快照方面还算不错。从表面上看，照片看起来相当不错，充其量只是在色彩还原方面有些暗淡。仔细观察则会发现动态和细节锐度不足。
在实验室光线非常暗的情况下，只能拍出粗略的细节。背面的第二个摄像头只能作为景深支持，不能独立拍照。
主摄像头拍摄视频的最大速度为 1080p 和 30 fps，自动对焦经常显得力不从心。
前置 800 万像素摄像头用于自拍。我们很喜欢拍出来的照片，即使是放大后的照片。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera Plant Main camera PlantMain camera Low Light
显示屏 - 无 PWM 闪烁
屏幕分辨率只有 1 600 x 720 像素。帧频也不可能超过 60 Hz。
不过，屏幕亮度相对较高，最高亮度可达 450 - 505 cd/m²，仍然适合阴天户外使用。不过，在色彩还原方面，你必须忍受明显的偏蓝现象。
在这款廉价智能手机上，我们没有发现 PWM 闪烁现象。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 505 cd/m²
Contrast: 953:1 (Black: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.94 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 6.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
91.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.116
CCT: 8333 K
| Samsung Galaxy A06 IPS, 1600x720, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A05s PLS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Motorola Moto G05 IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Xiaomi Redmi A3 IPS, 1650x720, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 16% | 35% | 21% | |
| Brightness middle | 505 | 520 3% | 370 -27% | 368 -27% |
| Brightness | 475 | 467 -2% | 358 -25% | 359 -24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 84 -6% | 92 3% | 92 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.53 | 0.36 32% | 0.24 55% | 0.28 47% |
| Contrast | 953 | 1444 52% | 1542 62% | 1314 38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.94 | 5.25 12% | 2.09 65% | 3.76 37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.63 | 10.48 52% | 5.49 75% | 7.19 67% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 7.1 -15% | 1.7 73% | 4.5 27% |
| Gamma | 2.116 104% | 2.25 98% | 2.317 95% | 2.277 97% |
| CCT | 8333 78% | 8660 75% | 6405 101% | 7305 89% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8283 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 35.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 小功率
联发科 联发科 Helio G85SoC 的性能储备不足，在日常使用中经常会出现问题。不过，这个价位的其他手机也没有更好的表现，Galaxy A06 甚至时不时还能在基准测试中多得几分。不过，这款智能手机不适合运行要求较高的应用程序。
即使长时间使用，外壳也几乎没有明显的发热现象，在压力测试中也能保持良好的性能。
小型扬声器音量适中，但听起来明显高音偏重。音效还算可以接受，但喜欢听好音乐的人会更喜欢连接扬声器或耳机。这可以通过 USB 或蓝牙实现。除了三星自己的编解码器外，几乎没有任何高保真版本可用于无线音频传输。
扬声器的容量为 5,000 毫安时，充电功率可达 25 瓦。充电时间不到 2 小时。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，这款智能手机的续航时间达到了 15:33 小时，即使频繁使用也能坚持一天。
| Samsung Galaxy A06 | Samsung Galaxy A05s | Motorola Moto G05 | Xiaomi Redmi A3 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 14% | 15% | -26% | -20% | 554% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 295.4 | 441.25 49% | 289.9 -2% | 270.1 -9% | 274 ? -7% | 2200 ? 645% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 166.3 | 114.19 -31% | 246.8 48% | 118.2 -29% | 177.4 ? 7% | 1799 ? 982% |
| Random Read 4KB | 74 | 102.99 39% | 100.8 36% | 65.5 -11% | 60.2 ? -19% | 295 ? 299% |
| Random Write 4KB | 86.8 | 84.71 -2% | 67.6 -22% | 41 -53% | 33.4 ? -62% | 339 ? 291% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMarkSteel Nomad 压力测试
| 3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Moto G05 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A05s | |
| Samsung Galaxy A06 | |
Samsung Galaxy A06 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi A3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Samsung Galaxy A06 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A05s 5000 mAh | Motorola Moto G05 5200 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi A3 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -3% | 4% | -3% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 933 | 905 -3% | 973 4% | 902 -3% |
| Reader / Idle | 2190 | |||
| H.264 | 957 | |||
| Load | 284 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
这是一款非常便宜的手机，但你却不得不舍弃一些东西。
作为回报，它拥有漂亮且相当稳定的机身、相对明亮的无 PWM 显示屏和良好的电池续航能力。
Samsung Galaxy A06
- 08/25/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 68.2%  | Samsung Galaxy A06 Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC | Amazon: $107.29 List Price: 90€ | 189 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.70" 1600x720 262 PPI IPS |
2. 68.5%  | Samsung Galaxy A05s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 610 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC | Amazon: $118.99 | 194 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.70" 2400x1080 393 PPI PLS LCD |
3. 71.1%  | Motorola Moto G05 Mediatek Helio G81 ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC | Amazon: 1. $5.35 Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit... 2. $4.99 Anoowkoa 3 Pack Compatible w... 3. $6.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... List Price: 130€ | 189 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.56" 1612x720 269 PPI IPS |
4. 64%  | Xiaomi Redmi A3 Mediatek Helio G36 ⎘ PowerVR GE8320 ⎘ 3 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC | Amazon: List Price: 120€ | 193 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.71" 1650x720 268 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
