Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉Moto G41评测--带OIS和750尼特的OLED智能手机,价格很高

200欧元不费吹灰之力? 根据其规格表,Moto G41以非常低的价格配备了非常好的硬件。这款经济实惠的中档智能手机具有非常明亮的OLED面板,以及支持OIS的主摄像头,在日常使用中几乎不需要任何妥协。但是,对于注重价格的客户来说,它真的是一款必须的产品吗?
Smartphone Touchscreen
摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测

摩托罗拉Moto G41与我们不久前评测的 G31兄弟姐妹非常相似。它共享相同的联发科 Helio G85-ProzessorSoC,以及相同的60 Hz 6.4英寸OLED面板,以原生1080p分辨率运行。

欧洲机型配备了6GB内存和128GB存储。像许多 Moto G,这款经济实惠的中档智能手机配备了5000毫安时的电池,支持高达30瓦的充电。此外,Moto G41还配备了支持OIS的48MP主摄像头。

总而言之,这些规格听起来几乎好得不能再好,因为它的建议零售价低至249欧元,特别是考虑到摩托罗拉自己有时已经在以低于200欧元的价格出售它。

Motorola Moto G41 (Moto G Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G85 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.40 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 411 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 109 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast, FM Radio
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 161.9 x 73.9
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.7, OIS) + 8 MP (f/2.2) + 2 MP (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.2)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: Virtual, USB cable, case, charger, MyUX, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.740W/​kg head, 1.790W/​kg body, widevine L1, fanless
Weight
178 g, Power Supply: 93 g
Price
249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.6 %
04/2022
Motorola Moto G41
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
178 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.40"2400x1080
78.5 %
03/2022
Nokia G21
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
190 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
78.6 %
02/2022
Samsung Galaxy M32
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
180 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.40"2400x1080
79.4 %
02/2022
Vivo Y52 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
193 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.58"2408x1080
80.5 %
01/2022
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2
195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2400x1080

保护壳 - 摩托罗拉智能手机,带冲孔设计

珍珠金的Moto G41
珍珠金的Moto G41

摩托G41的塑料后盖有两种不同的颜色。与其他大多数 Moto智能手机不同的是,G41的特点是略带反光和光泽,而不是哑光的表面,导致其伪装性差,因此非常清楚地看到指纹和污点。

它的制造质量很好,特别是考虑到它的低价格,而且与 Moto G51,它不是IP52,而是IPX2认证的。换句话说:防止被水和雨水溅到。

G41的显示屏边框即使在其价格级别中也是相当厚的,特别是在底部,导致显示屏与机身的比率相当低,只有83%。总的来说,这款178克(6.3盎司)重、8毫米(0.31英寸)厚的智能手机相对紧凑,因此拿在手里感觉非常舒适。与其他摩托罗拉智能手机一样,Moto G41也有一个专门的谷歌助理按钮。

摩托罗拉Moto G41的陨石黑
摩托罗拉Moto G41的陨石黑
摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测

尺寸比较

164.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.5 mm 190 g164 mm 75.3 mm 8.5 mm 193 g163.56 mm 75.78 mm 8.75 mm 195 g161.9 mm 73.9 mm 8.3 mm 178 g159.3 mm 74 mm 8.4 mm 180 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - Moto G41带3.5毫米音频插孔

默认情况下,该设备配有128GB的eMMC存储空间,由于操作系统和预装应用程序的大小,我们发现第一次启动后可使用109GB。不支持通过microSD进行存储扩展。

不过,支持的是通过G41的3.5毫米耳机插孔连接模拟声音设备,以及调频广播。5,000毫安时的电池通过设备的USB-C端口(USB 2.0)充电,并支持外部外围设备,如通过USB-OTG存储棒。

另一项功能是Miracast,用于向外部显示器提供无线屏幕镜像,由于G41的Widevine L1认证,来自Netflix或Prime Video等流媒体服务可以享受高清质量。

顶部(麦克风,3.5毫米音频插孔)
顶部(麦克风,3.5毫米音频插孔)
右边(按钮)
右边(按钮)
底部(麦克风、USB接口、扬声器)
底部(麦克风、USB接口、扬声器)
左侧(SIM卡插槽)
左侧(SIM卡插槽)

微型SD卡读卡器

内置的microSD卡插槽支持SDHC和SDXC卡,最高可达1TB。我们的复制测试以24MB/s的坚实速度完成。有了这一点,三星Galaxy M32的速度几乎是其两倍。尽管如此,当用我们的AV PRO V60参考卡进行基准测试时,该设备在跨平台测试中表现非常好。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
40.7 MB/s +67%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
24.3 MB/s
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.6 MB/s -15%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
15.47 MB/s -36%
Vivo Y52 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
14.5 MB/s -40%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Motorola Moto G41 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø29.1 (18.9-42.3)
Samsung Galaxy M32 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.7 (25-43.4)
Motorola Moto G41 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø67.9 (19.3-81.6)
Samsung Galaxy M32 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø60.7 (30.5-64.9)

软件 - 摩托罗拉智能手机与Android 11

摩托罗拉的MyUX用户界面是一个干净和优化的Android 11覆盖。我们评测单元上的安全补丁截至2022年1月,更新保证为两年,或2023年11月。

与所有摩托罗拉智能手机一样,G41配备了标准的Moto Experience功能,以及字体、颜色、图标和指纹动画的各种定制和个性化选项。摩托G41不支持Ready For。作为回报,摩托罗拉提供了名为ThinkShield for Mobile的硬件和软件安全功能,从而加强了对恶意软件、网络钓鱼和未经授权的网络访问的保护。

G41不支持有真正的永远在线功能。相反,摩托罗拉在其主显示屏上选择了众所周知的预览功能,尽管该设备是OLED显示屏,但没有配置永远在线模式的可能性。

摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测

通信和GNSS - 带有NFC的摩托罗拉智能手机

在通信方面,摩托罗拉选择了旧的4G标准,而不是5G,这款中档智能手机的HG85 SoC不支持5G。然而,它确实支持NFC以及蓝牙5.0。

4G连接非常好,完全支持欧洲常用的所有LTE频段,包括28频段。总共有14个支持的LTE频段,考虑到G41的价格,这是可以接受的,这款手机在国外旅行时的装备不是特别好。

在家里,该设备支持传统的Wi-Fi 5网络,导致整体传输速度很好。当连接到我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器时,Moto G41在传输(TX)和接收(RX)数据方面的表现非常稳定。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Vivo Y52 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
350 (344min - 355max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
347 (327min - 352max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s
Vivo Y52 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (324min - 347max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
335 (259min - 351max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=205, last 2 years)
648 MBit/s +95%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
332 (302min - 340max) MBit/s
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
299 (224min - 315max) MBit/s -10%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=206, last 2 years)
683 MBit/s +86%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
367 (350min - 381max) MBit/s
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB eMMC Flash
339 (328min - 362max) MBit/s -8%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Motorola Moto G41; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø331 (302-340)
Motorola Moto G41; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (350-381)
在室内的GPS
在室内的GPS
户外的GPS
户外的GPS

我们测试智能手机真正的GPS卫星导航能力,方法是带着它在街区内骑车游览,在设备本身以及专业的Garmin Venu 2上记录轨迹。支持的定位服务包括GPS(L1)、GLONASS、Galileo(E1)和基于卫星的增强系统SBAS。

在详细查看记录的轨迹时,我们发现Moto G41和Garmin Venu 2之间有一些差异,尽管这些差异往往对G41有利,因为它的记录结果更准确。虽然它有时也会记录不正确的位置数据,但其总体偏差在最坏的情况下也很轻微。因此,它应该很适合于日常导航。

Garmin Venu 2
Garmin Venu 2
Garmin Venu 2
Garmin Venu 2
Garmin Venu 2
Garmin Venu 2
摩托罗拉Moto G41
摩托罗拉Moto G41
摩托罗拉Moto G41
摩托罗拉Moto G41
摩托罗拉Moto G41
摩托罗拉Moto G41

电话和通话质量 - 双卡双待的Moto G41

摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测

Moto G41不支持通过microSD进行存储扩展,但它确实具有真正的双卡支持,包括VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话,这要归功于它的两个Nano SIM插槽。通过该设备的耳机进行通话的质量很好,总体上不显眼。

使用前置摄像头通过Skype进行视频通话,效果非常好,通过设备的扬声器发出的声音清晰可懂。反过来说,我们自己的声音被录制得略微有些模糊,并有一些背景静电。扬声器在安静的环境中工作得相当好。

相机 - 摩托罗拉智能手机与OIS

摩托G41自拍
摩托G41自拍
纵向模式
纵向模式

只要你保持你的期望,Moto G41的前置摄像头就不会令人失望。即使在困难的照明条件下,照片和明亮的天空也很少有曝光过度的情况,而且用这个1300万像素的摄像头拍摄的照片的软化程度也不是太强硬。

面向后方的三摄像头阵列有一个4800万像素的主摄像头,光圈为f/1.7,并具有光学图像稳定功能,这是这个价格范围内很少遇到的功能。它能够实现良好的低光照图像质量,尽管整体对焦有些差。

然而,考虑到Moto G41的价格,该相机在明亮环境下的图像质量是绰绰有余的,在日光下有良好的对焦和对比度,并有一些明显的软化作用。另一个亮点是Moto G41的色彩准确性,比一些高端的高级智能手机要好得多。我们使用标准化测试分析了4800万像素主摄像头的色彩准确度,在正常化条件下测量了全棚光下的色彩偏差,然后在环境光水平仅为1勒克斯的情况下测量了色彩偏差。在这个ColorChecker护照测试中,摩托罗拉Moto G41只显示了一个值得注意的Delta E > 10的单一峰值,而且我们还希望有一个更好的整体白平衡。

三重摄像头阵列由上述4800万像素主摄像头、用于拍摄微距和变焦照片的200万像素长焦镜头以及一个具有118°视野和f/2.2光圈的800万像素广角镜头组成。超广角相机的照片质量还不错,对于G41这个价格的手机来说,其细节之多令人惊讶。其他大多数经济实惠的中档智能手机在这方面的表现要差得多。

主摄像头和超广角摄像头都以30 FPS的速度录制视频,Moto G41既不支持更高的分辨率和帧率,也不能在录制时切换镜头。

广角
主摄像头
5倍变焦
8倍变焦(最大)
主摄像头
宏观
摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightWeitwinkel
click to load images
ColorChecker
5.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G41: 7.06 ∆E min: 3.12 - max: 11.53 ∆E
ColorChecker
22.2 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
27 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
31 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G41: 28.25 ∆E min: 12.24 - max: 43.33 ∆E

配件和保修 - 摩托G41带33W充电器

33W TurboPower充电器
33W TurboPower充电器

盒子里有一个33W的充电器,一个漂亮的保护套,一条USB-C电缆,一份快速启动指南,以及一个SIM卡工具。可选的耳机可以直接通过摩托罗拉自己的网店独家购买。

默认情况下,G41有两年的有限保修期,在特定市场可以再延长12个月。价格和条件因国家不同而不同。

输入设备和操作 - 带有面部解锁的摩托罗拉智能手机

G41的6.4英寸OLED显示屏能非常准确和快速地登记输入,直至其边缘。这款实惠的Moto智能手机不支持比显示屏默认的60赫兹更高的刷新率。

指纹识别器被集成到Moto G41右侧的电源按钮上。它工作可靠,但不是特别快。此外,该手机还可以通过使用设备的前置摄像头进行面部识别来解锁。虽然它总体上工作可靠,但你必须记住,二维面部解锁功能并不是特别安全。

摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测

显示屏 - 带有OLED显示屏的Moto G41

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

摩托G41采用6.4英寸AMOLED显示屏,原始分辨率为2400 x 1080,刷新率为60 Hz。如果不是SGM32的90赫兹刷新率,其显示屏和G41的20:9显示屏可能采用相同的面板,因为它们在亮度和照明方面的表现几乎相同。

在全白的背景下,摩托罗拉的中档智能手机能达到712尼特的平均水平,在运行APL50测试时,在中心位置增加到750尼特,并有一个黑暗和明亮的斑块交替的模式。这可能不会使G41的面板成为消费HDR内容的理想选择,但公平地说,摩托罗拉也没有这样推销它。

由于其面板的OLED性质,显示器在50%及以下的亮度水平上确实存在240赫兹的PWM闪烁,在更低的亮度水平上有更均匀的振幅,几乎类似于传统的直流调光。

739
cd/m²
721
cd/m²
701
cd/m²
720
cd/m²
713
cd/m²
673
cd/m²
734
cd/m²
709
cd/m²
698
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 739 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 712 cd/m² Minimum: 3.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 713 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.264
Motorola Moto G41
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Nokia G21
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy M32
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Vivo Y52 5G
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.58
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.60
Screen
-148%
-26%
-62%
-70%
Brightness middle
713
492
-31%
712
0%
458
-36%
504
-29%
Brightness
712
484
-32%
720
1%
437
-39%
499
-30%
Brightness Distribution
91
86
-5%
95
4%
89
-2%
91
0%
Black Level *
0.46
0.39
0.72
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
6.02
-447%
1.94
-76%
3.28
-198%
3.3
-200%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.39
9.13
-282%
5.81
-143%
5.07
-112%
6
-151%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.7
7.1
-92%
1.5
59%
3.2
14%
4.1
-11%
Gamma
2.264 97%
2.345 94%
2.089 105%
2.267 97%
2.28 96%
CCT
7373 88%
8918 73%
6593 99%
7214 90%
7041 92%
Contrast
1070
1174
700

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

我们使用CalMAN软件确定显示面板的色彩准确性。在默认设置下(色彩配置文件:自然),显示器几乎涵盖了整个sRGB色彩空间,Delta E偏差非常低,灰度偏差略微提高(Delta E>3),并有轻微的紫色色调。

色彩准确性(色彩空间:sRGB;色彩配置文件:自然)。
色彩准确性(色彩空间:sRGB;色彩配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(色彩空间:AdobeRGB;色彩配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(色彩空间:AdobeRGB;色彩配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(色彩空间:P3;色彩配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(色彩空间:P3;色彩配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(色彩空间:sRGB;色彩配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(色彩空间:sRGB;色彩配置文件:自然)。
灰度(色彩空间:sRGB;色彩配置:自然)。
灰度(色彩空间:sRGB;色彩配置:自然)。
灰度(色彩空间:sRGB;色彩配置文件:Vivid)。
灰度(色彩空间:sRGB;色彩配置文件:Vivid)。
饱和度(色彩空间:sRGB;色彩配置:自然)。
饱和度(色彩空间:sRGB;色彩配置:自然)。
 

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
亮度为50%及以下时,240赫兹的PWM闪动
亮度为50%及以下时,240赫兹的PWM闪动
0%的亮度
0%的亮度
25%的亮度
25%的亮度
50%的亮度
50%的亮度
75%的亮度
75%的亮度
100%的亮度
100%的亮度

由于Moto G41的高显示亮度,它在户外的表现非常好。在阳光直射下,它只是被其高反射率的显示屏挡住了。

正如预期的那样,它的AMOLED显示屏的可视角度非常好,亮度略有下降,在极端角度下有非常小的蓝色色调。

摩托罗拉Moto G41智能手机评测

性能 - 采用联发科技术的摩托罗拉智能手机

Moto G41采用了联发科Helio G85SoC,采用12纳米FinFET工艺制造,共有八个核心,分布在两个集群中,两个ARM Cortex A75高性能核心,时钟速度高达2GHz,伴随着六个ARM Cortex A55效率核心,运行时钟速度高达1.8GHz。所有的图形都由ARMMali-G52 MP2 处理。

结合6GB的内存,Helio G85提供了坚实的系统性能,偶尔会有轻微的停顿和滞后。该设备的慢速eMMC存储也导致了相对较长的应用程序启动和加载时间。

因此,Moto G41勉强能够跟上其竞争对手的步伐,只能够超过UNISOC T606- powered Nokia G21Poco M4 Pro 5GDimensity 810相比之下,明显快于G41的Helio G85

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=214, last 2 years)
900 Points +156%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
598 Points +70%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
561 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
367 Points +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (344 - 437, n=12)
360 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
352 Points
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
312 Points -11%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=214, last 2 years)
2947 Points +130%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1809 Points +41%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1705 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1342 Points +5%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1184 - 1363, n=12)
1306 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1282 Points
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1185 Points -8%
Vulkan Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 15910, n=90, last 2 years)
4248 Points +250%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1600 Points +32%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1413 Points +17%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1163 - 1256, n=8)
1213 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1212 Points
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1186 Points -2%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
536 Points -56%
OpenCL Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (434 - 13654, n=82, last 2 years)
4036 Points +239%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1612 Points +35%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1377 Points +16%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1192 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1148 - 1233, n=8)
1182 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1161 Points -3%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
514 Points -57%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=209, last 2 years)
11643 Points +73%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9402 Points +39%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (6596 - 9338, n=10)
7876 Points +17%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
7805 Points +16%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
6749 Points
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
6508 Points -4%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6492 Points -4%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3777 Points +107%
Average of class Smartphone
  (712 - 7285, n=52, last 2 years)
3548 Points +94%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3423 Points +87%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1818 - 1898, n=7)
1850 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1827 Points
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1688 Points -8%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1385 Points -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (618 - 9451, n=52, last 2 years)
3905 Points +140%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3846 Points +136%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3405 Points +109%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1627 - 1759, n=7)
1703 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1627 Points
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1549 Points -5%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1236 Points -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3553 Points +34%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3489 Points +32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4525, n=52, last 2 years)
3005 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2647 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2495 - 2674, n=7)
2600 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2458 Points -7%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2400 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=115, last 2 years)
9038 Points +423%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3965 Points +129%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3580 Points +107%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1729 - 1897, n=7)
1830 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1743 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1729 Points
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1414 Points -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=114, last 2 years)
15757 Points +836%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4014 Points +138%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3637 Points +116%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1633 - 1765, n=7)
1696 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1684 Points
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1592 Points -5%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1255 Points -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=114, last 2 years)
4335 Points +62%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3801 Points +42%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3393 Points +27%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2644 - 2778, n=7)
2697 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2673 Points
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2609 Points -2%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2546 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2714 Points +92%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=104, last 2 years)
2680 Points +90%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2366 Points +68%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1387 - 1463, n=11)
1418 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1411 Points
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1319 Points -7%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
945 Points -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=104, last 2 years)
2667 Points +115%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2546 Points +106%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2220 Points +79%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1237 - 1268, n=11)
1256 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1238 Points
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1165 Points -6%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
806 Points -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3529 Points +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=104, last 2 years)
3126 Points +22%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3075 Points +20%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2558 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2084 - 2654, n=11)
2533 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2462 Points -4%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2379 Points -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=177, last 2 years)
6571 Points +358%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2770 Points +93%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2434 Points +70%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1434 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1393 - 1453, n=11)
1431 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1367 Points -5%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
959 Points -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=176, last 2 years)
9383 Points +639%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2570 Points +103%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2281 Points +80%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1269 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1234 - 1281, n=11)
1261 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1204 Points -5%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
814 Points -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=176, last 2 years)
4169 Points +57%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3804 Points +43%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3179 Points +19%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2533 - 2811, n=11)
2680 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2662 Points
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2605 Points -2%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2559 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6439, n=98, last 2 years)
2606 Points +83%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2489 Points +75%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2274 Points +59%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1391 - 1475, n=10)
1429 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1426 Points
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1363 Points -4%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
917 Points -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=98, last 2 years)
2765 Points +117%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2396 Points +88%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2134 Points +68%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1234 - 1326, n=10)
1277 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1273 Points
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1209 Points -5%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
783 Points -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2954 Points +89%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2882 Points +84%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 3525, n=98, last 2 years)
2671 Points +70%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2456 Points +57%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1567 - 2513, n=10)
2340 Points +49%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2298 Points +47%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1567 Points
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 9839, n=132, last 2 years)
2528 Points +243%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1235 Points +68%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1105 Points +50%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
736 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (706 - 761, n=12)
732 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
685 Points -7%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
397 Points -46%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=197, last 2 years)
6135 Points +738%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1210 Points +65%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1075 Points +47%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
732 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (698 - 757, n=12)
731 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
683 Points -7%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
393 Points -46%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 5226, n=202, last 2 years)
1647 Points +805%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
360 Points +98%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
320 Points +76%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (181 - 193, n=11)
186.2 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
182 Points
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
173 Points -5%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
111 Points -39%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=197, last 2 years)
1656 Points +830%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
348 Points +96%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
309 Points +74%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (178 - 191, n=11)
184.2 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
178 Points
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
172 Points -3%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
110 Points -38%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=180, last 2 years)
83.1 fps +108%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
56 fps +40%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (40 - 55, n=8)
47.4 fps +19%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
40 fps
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
39 fps -2%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=180, last 2 years)
243 fps +428%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
66 fps +43%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
46 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (43 - 46, n=8)
45 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
44 fps -4%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=181, last 2 years)
70.8 fps +222%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
36 fps +64%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (22 - 55, n=8)
34.1 fps +55%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
22 fps
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
21 fps -5%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=181, last 2 years)
137.8 fps +451%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
40 fps +60%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (25 - 26, n=8)
25.1 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
25 fps
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
24 fps -4%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=181, last 2 years)
59.7 fps +586%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
23 fps +164%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (8.7 - 30, n=8)
20.7 fps +138%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
13 fps +49%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
8.7 fps
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=181, last 2 years)
97.1 fps +594%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
26 fps +86%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (14 - 16, n=8)
15.3 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
15 fps +7%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
14 fps
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=181, last 2 years)
42.7 fps +421%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
13 fps +59%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (8.2 - 17, n=8)
12.2 fps +49%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
8.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
8 fps -2%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=181, last 2 years)
58.6 fps +523%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
16 fps +70%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
9.4 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (9 - 10, n=8)
9.4 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
9.3 fps -1%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=221, last 2 years)
43.1 fps +407%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
15 fps +76%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
13 fps +53%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (7.5 - 22, n=13)
12.2 fps +44%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
9.5 fps +12%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
8.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
8.1 fps -5%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=221, last 2 years)
63.1 fps +557%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
17 fps +77%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
15 fps +56%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
9.6 fps
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
9.2 fps -4%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (8 - 9.7, n=13)
9.13 fps -5%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
5.2 fps -46%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 105, n=221, last 2 years)
32.1 fps +494%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9.3 fps +72%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps +50%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (5 - 13, n=13)
7.87 fps +46%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6 fps +11%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
5.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
5.1 fps -6%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=221, last 2 years)
25.1 fps +638%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6.2 fps +82%
Vivo Y52 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.5 fps +62%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
3.4 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (3.1 - 3.5, n=13)
3.38 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
3.3 fps -3%
Nokia G21
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2 fps -41%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=151, last 2 years)
738649 Points +219%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
353908 Points +53%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
232228 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
231224 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (191865 - 231224, n=3)
213512 Points -8%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=54, last 2 years)
20600 Points +241%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9008 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
6908 Points +14%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (5912 - 7145, n=3)
6369 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
6049 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=162, last 2 years)
5686 Points +166%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3268 Points +53%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2138 - 2422, n=5)
2290 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2273 Points +6%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2138 Points
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=162, last 2 years)
9595 Points +120%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6361 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
5354 Points +23%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (4353 - 5010, n=5)
4622 Points +6%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
4353 Points
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12306, n=162, last 2 years)
6206 Points +119%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4589 Points +62%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2536 - 3437, n=5)
2917 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2834 Points
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2576 Points -9%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=162, last 2 years)
13856 Points +665%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2929 Points +62%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1811 - 1960, n=5)
1861 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1811 Points
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1798 Points -1%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=162, last 2 years)
1487 Points +45%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1334 Points +30%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1028 - 1198, n=5)
1132 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1077 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1028 Points
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=170, last 2 years)
103.9 Points +232%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
43.83 Points +40%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (29.2 - 52.8, n=6)
34.2 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy M32 (Chrome 98)
33.78 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G41 (Chrome 99)
31.3 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (66.1 - 104.3, n=2, last 2 years)
85.2 Points +51%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
84.8 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy M32 (Chrome 98)
58.2 Points +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (53.9 - 58.9, n=4)
56.6 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G41 (Chrome 99)
56.5 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=154, last 2 years)
104.4 runs/min +276%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
39.8 runs/min +43%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (27 - 40.6, n=5)
30.2 runs/min +9%
Samsung Galaxy M32 (Chome 98)
28.2 runs/min +1%
Motorola Moto G41 (Chrome 99)
27.8 runs/min
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (37 - 304, n=119, last 2 years)
131 Points +185%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
62 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy M32 (Chrome 98)
49 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G41 (Chrome 99)
46 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (43 - 47, n=5)
45.2 Points -2%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=205, last 2 years)
33314 Points +158%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
19010 Points +47%
Motorola Moto G41 (Chrome 99)
12937 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (10299 - 13977, n=10)
12223 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy M32 (Chrome 98)
10864 Points -16%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (2967 - 3939, n=6)
3536 ms * -2%
Motorola Moto G41 (Chrome 99)
3464 ms *
Samsung Galaxy M32 (Chrome 98)
3443 ms * +1%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
2410 ms * +30%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=168, last 2 years)
1658 ms * +52%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G41Nokia G21Samsung Galaxy M32Vivo Y52 5GXiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-8%
6%
164%
159%
-4%
354%
Sequential Read 256KB
298.5
257.6
-14%
297.3
0%
949
218%
964
223%
283 ?(106.7 - 511, n=73)
-5%
1471 ?(215 - 4512, n=213, last 2 years)
393%
Sequential Write 256KB
172.3
180.6
5%
178.7
4%
342.5
99%
471
173%
192.9 ?(72.3 - 314, n=73)
12%
1084 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=213, last 2 years)
529%
Random Read 4KB
86.9
74
-15%
98
13%
187.2
115%
148.8
71%
82.6 ?(8.63 - 247, n=73)
-5%
243 ?(22.2 - 543, n=213, last 2 years)
180%
Random Write 4KB
64.4
60.2
-7%
68.8
7%
207.5
222%
171.8
167%
53.9 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=73)
-16%
267 ?(13 - 709, n=213, last 2 years)
315%

游戏--Moto G41的得分是60 FPS

Moto G41的内置Mali GPU基于Bifrost架构,支持各种3D API,如OpenGL ES 3.2和Vulkan 1.0。说到这里,我们需要得出结论,Mali-G52 MP2,并不是为高要求的游戏而生。

例如,它只足以在29FPS左右的高清设置下运行PUBG Mobile,帧率偶尔下降,导致相当令人沮丧的游戏体验。进一步减少细节导致平均40 FPS,帧数下降不那么剧烈。

使用GameBench,我们看看谷歌游戏商店中另一款要求不高的游戏。Armajet。这款游戏能够在短时间内以面板上的最高帧率60 FPS运行。然而,它也遭受了意想不到的、急剧的帧数下降。

摩托罗拉Moto G41
摩托罗拉Moto G41
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Motorola Moto G41; Armajet: Ø52.9 (40-61)
Motorola Moto G41; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø34.7 (16-39)
Motorola Moto G41; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø33.8 (19-41)
Motorola Moto G41; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø28.9 (19-31)

排放--一致的摩托罗拉智能手机

温度

摩托G41 GFX-Benchmark
摩托G41 GFX-Benchmark

闲置时,Moto G41的表面温度非常低,几乎看不出来,我们发现负载下的最高温度只有40℃。考虑到其联发科SoC的一致性,这被证明是完全没问题的。

运行GFX基准测试,在记录帧率的同时以30倍的循环运行每个OpenGL ES 3.1场景,我们发现Moto G41在曼哈顿3.1的第20个循环中略有节流。

我们的最后一项测试是苛刻的3DMark压力测试,我们发现Helio G85,在最坏的情况下也只是略微节流。总而言之,Moto G41在负载下没有出现明显的热节流现象。

Max. Load
 38.3 °C33.5 °C32.2 °C 
 38.3 °C33.5 °C32.5 °C 
 38 °C34.2 °C32.2 °C 
Maximum: 38.3 °C
Average: 34.7 °C
32.9 °C34.5 °C40.2 °C
33.3 °C34.5 °C39.6 °C
33 °C34.2 °C38.6 °C
Maximum: 40.2 °C
Average: 35.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 (7.36min) % +1%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.7 (4.29min) %
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.5 (4.08min) % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 (2.15min) % 0%
Motorola Moto G41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.9 (1.087min) %
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
97.7 (1.03min) % -1%
01234567Tooltip
Motorola Moto G41 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø1.093 (1.087-1.098)
Samsung Galaxy M32 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.044 (1.03-1.054)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø2.16 (2.15-2.17)
Motorola Moto G41 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.34 (4.29-4.35)
Samsung Galaxy M32 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.12 (4.08-4.14)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø7.38 (7.36-7.39)
摩托罗拉Moto G41
摩托罗拉Moto G41

发言人

Moto G41配备了一个单声道扬声器。它只有82 dB(A),不是同类产品中最响亮的,但肯定是最好的之一,有线性的高音和中音,但几乎完全缺乏低音。说到这里,我们还必须注意到,入门级手机,如Redmi 10,其立体声扬声器产生的声音效果比摩托罗拉Moto G41所能达到的要好得多,空间感也很强。

通过Moto G41的3.5毫米音频插孔或通过蓝牙5.0无线连接外部扬声器或耳机,可以享受到大为改善的具有真正低音的音频体验。后者支持各种高清音频编解码器,如SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX自适应、LDAC和LHDC(V3)。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.549.12535.538.13131.729.14030.836.45032.235.46325.131.68019.422.610020.928.512517.633.216015.842.72001345.625011.748.231510.656.840010.560.850011.965.563013.86880015.468.9100012.770.412501671160012.472.7200011.668.9250013.168.5315013.171.1400013.772500014.270.9630014.772.2800015.373.31000015.967.61250016.569.81600017.159.5SPL26.182.6N0.755.6median 13.8median 68.5Delta1.97.935.93326.426.123.723.526.926.831.732.323.228.721.222.41826.413.930.716.141.411.740.912.246.79.350.69.153.39.259.79.758.910.663.510.970.911.970.61271.212.674.412.776.712.179.212.682.413.382.913.278.613.674.313.77313.670.613.666.324.489.30.569.3median 12.6median 70.61.610.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G41Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G41 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 配备5000毫安时电池的摩托罗拉智能手机

消耗功率

就像其更大的兄弟姐妹,G51,Moto G41配备了5000毫安时的电池。与G51不同的是,G41支持快速充电,使用附带的33W电源,从接近空电到充满电的时间很短,只有65分钟。

与其竞争对手相比,摩托罗拉Moto G41的功耗并不明显,除了其超过1瓦的闲置功耗。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.1 / 1.6 Watt
Load midlight 4.3 / 6.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto G41
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M32
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G85
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-32%
-7%
-17%
-18%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
1
-11%
0.51
43%
0.957 ?(0.7 - 1.7, n=6)
-6%
0.896 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years)
-0%
Idle Average *
1.1
1.8
-64%
1.96
-78%
1.628 ?(0.9 - 2.9, n=6)
-48%
1.449 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years)
-32%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
2.4
-50%
2.01
-26%
2 ?(1.3 - 3, n=6)
-25%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years)
-2%
Load Average *
4.3
5.1
-19%
3.86
10%
4.35 ?(3.5 - 5.3, n=6)
-1%
5.51 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=159, last 2 years)
-28%
Load Maximum *
6.5
7.4
-14%
5.62
14%
6.95 ?(6.11 - 8.5, n=6)
-7%
8.19 ?(4.32 - 20.8, n=159, last 2 years)
-26%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Motorola Moto G41 Mediatek Helio G85: Ø4.17 (1.509-7.52)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810: Ø2.92 (1.037-5.3)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.711.21.41.71.92.22.42.62.93.13.43.63.84.14.34.6Tooltip
Motorola Moto G41 Mediatek Helio G85; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.25 (3.68-4.79)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.11 (2.88-3.5)
Motorola Moto G41 Mediatek Helio G85; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.504 (1.085-1.908)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.176 (1.05-1.745)

电池寿命

电池寿命总体上非常好,其中的原因是面板的刷新率很低,只有60赫兹。因此,摩托罗拉Moto G41在我们的实际Wi-Fi测试中能够运行15小时以上,在视频播放测试中能够运行22小时以上。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
30h 49min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 38min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 51min
Motorola Moto G41
5000 mAh
Nokia G21
5050 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M32
5000 mAh
Vivo Y52 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
20%
-2%
9%
3%
Reader / Idle
1849
2076
12%
2722
47%
H.264
1298
1137
-12%
1008
-22%
WiFi v1.3
905
1087
20%
1098
21%
987
9%
966
7%
Load
411
296
-28%
322
-22%

Pros

+ 在其价格范围内非常明亮的OLED面板
+ 3.5毫米的音频插孔
+ 电池寿命长
+ OIS

Cons

- 性能差
- 没有立体声
- 存储速度慢
- 没有5G

摩托罗拉Moto G41的评测

在审查中。摩托罗拉Moto G41。评测单位由Cyperport提供。
在审查中。摩托罗拉Moto G41。评测单位由Cyperport提供。

随着Moto G41的推出,摩托罗拉终于解决了平价中档智能手机经常受到批评的一个方面:显示屏。更多的时候,摩托罗拉的平价智能手机受到显示屏昏暗的影响(Moto G31, Edge 20 Lite) 或其他问题(Moto G60s) 。然而,这里的情况并非如此,Moto G41的显示屏非常出色。

高对比度的AMOLED显示屏非常明亮,而且校准得非常好。它的唯一缺陷是刷新率只有60赫兹。如果这对你来说是个问题,其他类似的智能手机可能是一个更好的选择,例如三星Galaxy M32 4G智能手机评测--不到300欧元(约345美元)的明亮90Hz屏幕Galaxy M32,它有明亮的90 Hz OLED面板。

由于其光学图像稳定功能、良好的传感器和体面的广角摄像头,相机的表现大体上非常好,可以拍出细节丰富的照片。对于一款经济实惠的中档智能手机来说,色彩表现非常出色。它唯一的弱点是FHD视频录制,只有30FPS。其他智能手机,如Edge 20 Lite,在这方面表现更好。

如果你预算紧张,Moto G41可能是适合你的手机。它可能并不完美,但它还是提供了一个非常好的整体交易。

在这个价格范围内,Moto G41需要做出各种妥协,这是非常常见的。例如,它的Helio G85 SoC对于200欧元以下的智能手机来说可能是一个不错的选择,但是当与G41的慢速eMMC存储搭配时,其功能远远不足以确保流畅的可用性。这种特殊的联发科SoC也仅限于4G LTE网络。如果你需要更多的性能或5G连接,Poco M4 Pro可能值得仔细看看。

价格和可用性

摩托罗拉不在北美地区销售Moto G41。然而,国际无锁GSM-only单卡版本已经在亚马逊上销售。目前价格为430美元起。

Motorola Moto G41 - 08/30/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 68%
Weight
90%
Battery
91%
Display
92%
Games Performance
16 / 64 → 25%
Application Performance
56 / 86 → 65%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
82 / 90 → 91%
Camera
62%
Average
75%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Moto G41评测--带OIS和750尼特的OLED智能手机,价格很高
Marcus Herbrich, 2022-04- 2 (Update: 2022-04- 2)