摩托罗拉Moto G13评测--带NFC的经济实惠的智能手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79 % | 04/2023 | Motorola Moto G13 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 183.5 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
77.3 % | 11/2022 | Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 195 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
74.4 % | 11/2022 | Xiaomi Poco C40 JR510, Mali-G52 MP1 | 204 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.71" | 1650x720 | |
76 % | 08/2022 | Realme Narzo 50A Prime T612, Mali-G52 MP1 | 192.5 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
79 % | 03/2023 | Motorola Moto G23 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 184.3 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和功能 - 有三种颜色可供选择
玫瑰金、薰衣草蓝或深灰色是Moto G13的三种颜色变体,这是2023年最便宜的摩托罗拉G系列机型。制造商希望这款手机仅有不到180欧元的价格。考虑到低廉的价格,背面仅由塑料制成,但在相机模块的光线折射下,它看起来仍然很漂亮。
然而,对屏幕和背部的压力在液晶显示器上很快就能看到,而且手机不能用正常的力量扭动。边缘和材料过渡符合人体工程学的圆滑,手机的手感不错。
凭借128GB的eMMC闪存,手机的大容量存储相当缓慢,但也很广泛:目前,大多数价格相近的竞争对手仍然提供64甚至只有32GB的数据存储。还有一个NFC模块,这在这个价格范围内绝不是理所当然的事情。
SD卡读卡器是独立的,所以它可以同时使用两张SIM卡。在我们的基准测试中,Moto G13能以其价格范围内的良好传输率说服参考的microSD Angelbird V60,但它并没有真正利用快速存储卡的可能传输速度。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (10.9 - 77, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G13 (Angelbird V60) | |
Motorola Moto G23 (Angelbird V60) | |
Realme Narzo 50A Prime (Angelbird V60) | |
Xiaomi Poco C40 (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 稳定的WLAN
摩托罗拉的廉价智能手机使用WiFi 5,与我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000一起在基准测试中提供了非常稳定和快速的传输速率。
Moto G13是一款4G手机,我们的德国测试设备提供了在中欧运行的所有必要频率。然而,当你进一步旅行时,你必须检查是否可以在当地使用移动互联网,因为它绝不是一个世界性的手机。
在我们审查期间的随机测试中,对于一个廉价手机来说,移动接收是体面的,但不能跟上高端手机的步伐。
Android 13是预装在Moto G13上的。它是纯粹的 ,没有重大变化,系统只包含Android 一些预装的第三方应用程序。然而,在测试时,2023年1月的安全补丁有点老。
摩托手机可以通过触摸屏迅速而可靠地进行操作。这也归功于摩托罗拉的90赫兹刷新率,它能实现流畅的滚动。
指纹传感器隐藏在待机按钮的右侧,工作可靠而精确。它能快速解锁Moto G13。也可以通过面部识别进入主屏幕:这在黑暗中也很有效,屏幕的余光通常足以识别。然而,由于是纯软件实现,这种方法并不十分安全。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Motorola Moto G13 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
Xiaomi Poco C40 | |
Realme Narzo 50A Prime | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Motorola Moto G13 | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
Xiaomi Poco C40 | |
Realme Narzo 50A Prime |
照相机--主镜头,照片尚可
背面的5000万像素摄像头来自三星,被用于许多廉价的智能手机。摩托罗拉用一个200万像素的长焦镜头和一个深度传感器对其进行补充。
主摄像头在拍摄物体时显示出模糊的细节,但我们很喜欢周围的图像,因为墙壁上的结构也保持得很清楚,而且整体清晰度令人信服。
在低光照和高对比度的情况下,相当低的动态范围变得很明显:明亮的区域被掩盖,而在黑暗部分几乎看不到任何细节。在实验室里,主摄像头显示了一个令人惊讶的测试图表的清晰图像,只是在小细节和对比度方面需要改进。然而,在几个勒克斯的亮度下,相机不能用残余的光线产生合理的图像。
前面有一个800万像素的摄像头。它拍摄的自拍有点太暗,不应该被放大太多,因为否则,模糊的细节就会显现出来。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLowLight显示屏 - 90赫兹的明亮屏幕
Moto G13的显示屏分辨率为1600 x 720像素,而其他一些价格范围内的智能手机,如 Galaxy A13或 realme Narzo 50A Prime,也能拥有全高清分辨率。然而,摩托罗拉用90赫兹的刷新率进行了补偿,这使得操作更加顺畅,滚动看起来更加漂亮。
Moto G13的屏幕也非常明亮:我们测得的平均亮度为553cd/m²,这是对比设备中的最佳值。因此,你可以在较亮的日子里到外面去,仍然可以在一定程度上识别屏幕内容。还有一个Widevine认证,所以你可以用高清观看内容。
灰度中只有非常轻微的偏蓝,黑度相当低,所以屏幕上的黑暗区域也表现得很好,而且我们也没有注意到任何PWM。
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 555 cd/m²
Contrast: 1914:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
91.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.131
Motorola Moto G13 IPS, 1600x720, 6.50 | Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60 | Xiaomi Poco C40 IPS, 1650x720, 6.71 | Realme Narzo 50A Prime IPS, 2408x1080, 6.60 | Motorola Moto G23 IPS, 1600x720, 6.50 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 11% | 18% | 49% | 16% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48.5 ? | 39 ? 20% | 40 ? 18% | 30 ? 38% | 46 ? 5% |
Response Time Black / White * | 33.8 ? | 33 ? 2% | 28 ? 17% | 14 ? 59% | 25 ? 26% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | -5% | -16% | -3% | -14% | |
Brightness middle | 555 | 492 -11% | 468 -16% | 540 -3% | 522 -6% |
Brightness | 553 | 453 -18% | 450 -19% | 523 -5% | 502 -9% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 87 -6% | 92 -1% | 93 0% | 91 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.37 -28% | 0.4 -38% | 0.39 -34% | 0.47 -62% |
Contrast | 1914 | 1330 -31% | 1170 -39% | 1385 -28% | 1111 -42% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.17 | 4.34 16% | 4.53 12% | 4.39 15% | 4.63 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.61 | 5.94 44% | 8.96 16% | 6.65 37% | 8.59 19% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 4.7 -4% | 6.5 -44% | 4.7 -4% | 5.2 -16% |
Gamma | 2.131 103% | 2.398 92% | 2.191 100% | 2.261 97% | 2.296 96% |
CCT | 7380 88% | 7668 85% | 8122 80% | 7597 86% | 7832 83% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
-2% | 1% /
-9% | 23% /
8% | 1% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
33.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.4 ms rise | |
↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
48.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.1 ms rise | |
↘ 21.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命 - Moto G13持续时间长
淘宝网 联发科Helio G85最初是为中高档手机开发的,但现在显然非常便宜,摩托罗拉也可以将其安装在经济型手机中。该SoC实际上为其价格范围提供了良好的性能率,而且手机的速度大大超过了,例如 Galaxy A13.在日常使用中,菜单导航相当流畅,但在要求更高的应用程序中,你必须考虑到卡顿的问题。
不幸的是,只有非常慢的eMMC闪存被用于存储,这意味着复制和加载需要比高端手机更长的时间。
38.4°C的最高温度并不关键,性能也不会受到影响,3DMark压力测试告诉我们:即使在多次运行该基准测试后,实现的帧率也基本相同。
Moto G13可以将听筒作为第二个扬声器,从而创造出立体声效果。声音总体上是好的,不会过度膨胀,但音乐听起来有点闷闷的。扬声器的声音也不是很响。在智能手机的上边缘有一个3.5毫米音频端口,可用于连接耳机或扬声器。外部音频设备也可以通过蓝牙连接。这里有许多编解码器,如aptX HD、LDAC或LHDC-V,都可以使用。
在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,Moto G13的5000毫安时电池可以持续使用18:35小时。这是一个非常好的比率,允许在中等程度的使用下持续两个工作日而没有问题。然而,该设备的最大充电功率为10瓦,所以有时需要3个小时才能使电池再次充满。
GFXBench | |
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (7.5 - 22, n=14) | |
Motorola Moto G13 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
Xiaomi Poco C40 | |
Realme Narzo 50A Prime | |
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (8 - 9.7, n=14) | |
Motorola Moto G13 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Realme Narzo 50A Prime | |
Xiaomi Poco C40 | |
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (5 - 13, n=14) | |
Motorola Moto G13 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
Xiaomi Poco C40 | |
Realme Narzo 50A Prime | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (3.1 - 3.5, n=14) | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
Motorola Moto G13 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Realme Narzo 50A Prime | |
Xiaomi Poco C40 |
Motorola Moto G13 | Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | Xiaomi Poco C40 | Realme Narzo 50A Prime | Motorola Moto G23 | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -10% | -37% | 96% | 2% | -20% | 282% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 281.1 | 300.6 7% | 281.7 0% | 852.8 203% | 282.4 0% | 283 ? 1% | 1508 ? 436% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 244.7 | 230.3 -6% | 129.8 -47% | 266 9% | 244.6 0% | 193 ? -21% | 1118 ? 357% |
Random Read 4KB | 99.4 | 94.5 -5% | 29.2 -71% | 145.3 46% | 100.2 1% | 82.4 ? -17% | 247 ? 148% |
Random Write 4KB | 94.9 | 61.5 -35% | 67.7 -29% | 212.5 124% | 100.5 6% | 54 ? -43% | 272 ? 187% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
3DMark | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Motorola Moto G13 | |
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F |
演讲者
Motorola Moto G13 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G23 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Pros
Cons
评语--低价位的Moto只有几个弱点
摩托罗拉的Moto G13以远低于200欧元的价格出售,并取得了不错的成绩:外壳看起来不错,包装中除了充电器外甚至还包括一个手机盖,而且这款智能手机配备了NFC以及该价格范围内的128GB大容量存储。
电池运行时间也令人信服,相机做得很好,Wi-Fi接收和传输速率很稳定。90赫兹的显示屏可以流畅地使用,并且非常明亮地发光。与其他便宜的手机相比,它只有轻微的蓝色偏光。
我们今年可能会在经济型手机中更多地看到这种水平的表现,但Moto G13表明即使是廉价手机也终于可以流畅地浏览菜单,甚至是一些要求更高的任务,这仍然是一件好事。
遗憾的是,内存只有缓慢的eMMC,但手机在负载下仅有少量发热,几乎没有节流的表现。除了对压力过于敏感的外壳和不确定的更新情况之外,我们几乎找不到任何真正的批评点。
摩托罗拉的Moto G13是一款相当快的平价中档手机,具有良好的功能:90赫兹显示屏、NFC和大量存储。
这款手机 realme Narzo 50A Prime具有全高清屏幕,现在在互联网上以更低的价格出售。 三星Galaxy A13比我们的测试设备稍便宜,但有一个类似的快速联发科SoC。
价格和可用性
摩托罗拉的Moto G13在互联网上的价格已经下降到大约160欧元(约160美元)。包括汽车适配器的深灰色版本现在在amazon.de上售价约170欧元(约170美元)。,价格与cyberport.de相似。.
浅蓝色版本在amazon.de上仍然贵10欧元。,而cyberport.de也提供170欧元的价格。玫瑰金色的Moto G13目前在中欧只在联想的网上商店有售。售价179欧元。
Motorola Moto G13
-
04/10/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.