Notebookcheck

三星Galaxy M22 智能手机评测--90Hz屏幕救场?

削减成本的国王。 Galaxy M22是Galaxy M21的更新版本。然而,与前代产品相比,一些功能被削减,价格也大幅提高。三星的便宜货智能手机是不是和它声称的一样?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
ARM Android Smartphone
三星Galaxy M22

三星的Galaxy M系列只在网上销售。Galaxy M22也不例外。它是一款没有5G的低价智能手机,具有相对紧凑的尺寸。建议零售价为250欧元(约合281美元),大大超过了Galaxy M21。然而,Galaxy M22配备了微距相机和90Hz的显示屏。也就是说,电池被缩小了,屏幕的分辨率降低了,而且Galaxy M22的SoC是否能跟上前代产品,还有待观察。

Galaxy M22必须与其他制造商的强大对手竞争。竞争的设备包括 摩托罗拉Moto G50小米红米10.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Samsung Galaxy M22
Processor
Mediatek Helio G80 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.40 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 274 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Super AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 105 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, dedicated, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 159.9 x 74
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 25W charging (Samsung AFC)
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​2.0, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, 1/3.1", 1.12µm
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, Charger, USB cable, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value: 0.62W/​kg (head), 1.24W/​kg (body); FM radio, fanless
Weight
186 g
Price
235 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Likely Competitors

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
79 %
12/2021
Samsung Galaxy M22
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
186 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.40"1600x720
79.5 %
04/2020
Samsung Galaxy M21
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
188 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2340x1080
79.2 %
06/2021
Motorola Moto G50
SD 480, Adreno 619
192 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720
78.5 %
11/2021
Nokia G50
SD 480, Adreno 619
220 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.82"1560x720
79 %
11/2021
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2
181 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"2400x1080

案例 - 背部有细条纹

三星Galaxy M22的外壳是由塑料制成的。然而,它有一个哑光的细条纹纹理,背面有一个略微凸起的制造商标志。这款智能手机在中欧有黑色和蓝色的配色,国际版也有白色的配色。

Galaxy M22的重量与前代产品差不多。然而,与笨重的诺基亚G50相比,其电池要小得多。 诺基亚G50.不过,我们的评测设备更轻、更紧凑。由于采用了圆润的边缘,这款手机的手感不错。Galaxy M22是一款中等大小的智能手机,对于手很小的人来说可能还是太高。

制造质量很好,智能手机相当坚硬。屏幕由大猩猩3号玻璃保护,对于这个价格范围内的设备来说,这还算可以。


三星Galaxy M22
三星Galaxy M22
三星Galaxy M22
三星Galaxy M22
三星Galaxy M22

Size comparison

173.8 mm 77.7 mm 8.9 mm 220 g164.9 mm 74.9 mm 9 mm 192 g161.95 mm 75.53 mm 8.92 mm 181 g159.9 mm 74 mm 8.4 mm 186 g159 mm 75.1 mm 8.9 mm 188 g

特点 - 大量的内存和NFC

249欧元(约281美元),你可以得到128GB的内部存储和4GB的内存,这高于这个价格范围内其他智能手机通常提供的。双SIM卡功能和一个专用的microSD卡插槽也是该套餐的一部分。

仍然包括一个NFC芯片,意味着你可以使用移动支付服务。3.5毫米的音频插孔肯定会让有线耳机的爱好者满意。

右边。电源键,音量摇杆
右边。电源键,音量摇杆
左边:SIM卡插槽
左边:SIM卡插槽
底部。 3.5毫米音频插孔、麦克风、USB-C端口、扬声器
底部。 3.5毫米音频插孔、麦克风、USB-C端口、扬声器
首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风

微型SD卡读卡器

我们使用我们的参考级SD卡 (Angelbird V60)来确定SD卡阅读器的性能。总而言之,SD卡读卡器的表现相当差。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
40.85 MB/s ∼100% +70%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
24 MB/s ∼59%
Nokia G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.7 MB/s ∼51% -14%
Motorola Moto G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
12.3 MB/s ∼30% -49%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M22 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø31.6 (25.8-40.4)
Motorola Moto G50 Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write: Ø34.9 (24.2-43.1)
Nokia G50 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø34.6 (7.62-42.4)
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.8 (26-44.9)
Samsung Galaxy M22 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø54.3 (1.78-65.4)
Motorola Moto G50 Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read: Ø79.1 (33.6-85.5)
Nokia G50 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø76.3 (31.1-83.5)
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø66.8 (7.33-79.4)

软件 -Galaxy M22与旧的安全补丁

Android 11被用作操作系统的基础,而三星的OneUI在其之上运行。OneUI有相当大的变化,其设计是为了尽可能用一只手舒适地操作该设备。

当涉及到安全补丁时,三星的智能手机处于一个糟糕的状态。在我们审查的时候,安全补丁已经过期4个月。

三星预先安装了一些专有的应用程序,这些应用程序部分重复了Android's stock apps已经提供的功能。例如,三星应用商店或新闻应用。至少没有预装第三方应用程序。

Galaxy M22有DRM L1认证,这意味着它可以以全高清方式传输视频。

三星Galaxy M22 软件
三星Galaxy M22 软件
三星Galaxy M22 软件

通信和GNSS - 信号强度良好,没有5G

Wi-Fi 5模块在这个价格范围内很常见。Galaxy M22实际上从其Wi-Fi模块中获得了非常好的速度,我们用我们的参考级路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12进行了测试。同样不错的是,在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,传输速率保持非常稳定。

有了M22,你将不得不忍受没有5G的日子。设备,如 诺基亚G50等设备更适合未来的发展。Galaxy M22支持数量不多的LTE频段。总而言之,它可以在旅行中使用。然而,你应该事先检查Galaxy M22是否能在你的目的地的移动网络中使用,因为Galaxy M22绝不是一款全球手机。

Galaxy M22设法在我们当地的4G网络中保持稳定的信号。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=280, last 2 years)
480 MBit/s ∼100% +38%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
349 (324min - 355max) MBit/s ∼73%
Nokia G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
322 (308min - 331max) MBit/s ∼67% -8%
Motorola Moto G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
312 (292min - 320max) MBit/s ∼65% -11%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
304 (285min - 323max) MBit/s ∼63% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
293 (284min - 301max) MBit/s ∼61% -16%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=280, last 2 years)
472 MBit/s ∼100% +44%
Nokia G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (294min - 350max) MBit/s ∼72% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
333 (299min - 358max) MBit/s ∼71% +2%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
332 (231min - 352max) MBit/s ∼70% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
328 (292min - 342max) MBit/s ∼69%
Motorola Moto G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
317 (256min - 332max) MBit/s ∼67% -3%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø328 (292-342)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø349 (324-355)
GPS户外测试
GPS户外测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

在户外,Galaxy M22可以被足够的卫星迅速定位,以获得我们的位置,误差为3米。为此使用了许多卫星网络,以及SBAS辅助服务。

尽管如此,Galaxy M22在我们的实际导航测试中还是出现了几次纰漏。由于天气状况不好,这次我们开了一辆车。

特别是在转弯时,智能手机经常把我们的位置放在路边,让人觉得我们在直接开车穿过房屋。在狭窄的老城区小巷和在河对面的桥上行驶时,准确度也相当差。然而,我们的对比设备,Garmin Venu 2,在这里也被证明是有些不准确的。

总的来说,我们只能建议那些不需要完全准确的人使用Galaxy M22进行导航。

定位三星Galaxy M22 - 概述
定位三星Galaxy M22 - 概述
定位三星Galaxy M22 - 转
定位三星Galaxy M22 - 转
定位三星Galaxy M22 - Bridge
定位三星Galaxy M22 - Bridge
追踪Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
追踪Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
定位Garmin Venu 2 - 转弯
定位Garmin Venu 2 - 转弯
定位Garmin Venu 2 - Bridge
定位Garmin Venu 2 - Bridge

电话和通话质量 - 可理解的电话通话

三星的专有电话应用与标准的Android 电话应用的结构略有不同。然而,它提供了所有的基本功能。只要移动运营商支持这些功能,就可以用Galaxy M22通过LTE和Wi-Fi进行通话。

在我们的耳塞测试通话中,来电者的声音有点尖锐,但可以理解,扬声器模式下的音质也差不多。麦克风能很好地捕捉到我们的声音,甚至在我们小声说话的时候。然而,偶尔会有一些干扰噪音,如吱吱声或回声。

相机 - 锐利度下降了

用前置摄像头拍摄
用前置摄像头拍摄

Galaxy M22的主摄像头的规格类似于Galaxy M21.4800万像素的镜头将4个像素组合成一个更感光的像素,从而在默认模式下产生1200万像素的图像。然而,如果需要,人们也可以使用全分辨率。

突出的是,在视频录制方面有限制。该机的主摄像头在 Galaxy M21能够录制4K视频,而M22则仅限于全高清和30FPS。这可能是由于新的,但实际上是旧的SoC,它不能编码4K视频。图像质量很好,自动对焦通常反应合理,曝光调整很快。录制时不可能在镜头之间切换。

那么照片质量呢?嗯,在拍摄植物时,背景得到相当好的虚化效果,细节仍然可见,所以亮度和动态范围都很好。同时,与更高端的智能手机相比,明显较低的锐度是明显的。全景拍摄也很不错,但看起来相当模糊。

与大多数智能手机相机一样,广角镜头第一眼就能拍出相当体面的照片,但由于照片的分辨率相当低,所以清晰度并不理想。顺便说一下,混合变焦是不可能的。你只能在主摄像头和广角镜头之间直接切换。

微距镜头只能在特殊模式下使用。分辨率相当低,拍摄对象应该有良好的光线,否则清晰度会很差。

前置摄像头位于一个水滴状的凹槽中。它的自拍效果很好,即使放大也能看到细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera cityMain camera low lightUltra wide-angle lens
click to load images

在测试实验室中,主摄像头也出现了轻微的模糊现象。在照度为1勒克斯的情况下,仍然可以猜到一些图像内容。

ColorChecker
15.7 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M22: 13.28 ∆E min: 3.41 - max: 22.23 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
52.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
63.6 ∆E
63.1 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
73.8 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
79.5 ∆E
69.1 ∆E
51 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M22: 45.57 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 79.47 ∆E

配件和保修 - 慢速充电器

配件包括一个充电器,一条USB线和一个SIM卡工具。恼人的是。Galaxy M22支持25W的充电,但附带的电源适配器的额定功率输出只有15W。在我们的测试中,25W的充电可以与许多不同制造商的充电器配合使用,这意味着市场上有的绝大多数快速充电器都应该可以使用。

三星的配件在线商店没有为Galaxy M22提供任何特别的东西。然而,你可以购买一个替代充电器(同样,只有15W的),价格低于25欧元(约28美元)。

制造商提供24个月的 保修.

输入设备和处理 - 由于有90-Hz的屏幕,感觉很快。

90Hz的屏幕是三星Galaxy M22的头条特征。在菜单中导航的感觉很顺畅,很愉快。触摸屏很容易使用,反应很灵敏。

这款智能手机的物理按钮(电源键、音量摇杆)位于右侧。这些按钮设置合理,提供良好的触觉反馈。

指纹传感器被集成到电源按钮中。它能快速、可靠地解锁智能手机。人脸识别也可用于解锁设备。

纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘

显示屏--像素不太密集

像素排列
像素排列

帧率上升--分辨率下降。如果将Galaxy M22的AMOLED屏幕与 M21的AMOLED屏幕进行比较,你可以这样描述它。Galaxy M21.现在,屏幕刷新率为90赫兹,但分辨率下降到HD Plus。前代机型有一个全高清屏幕。现在,720p在这个价格范围内并不完全不寻常,但 红米10和同样的 Galaxy M21显示,这里有更多的可能性。

亮度略低,但Galaxy 智能手机仍处于相对较高的水平。

542
cd/m²
544
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
539
cd/m²
549
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
535
cd/m²
545
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 557 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 541.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.87 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 539 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.21 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.179
Samsung Galaxy M22
Super AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.40
Samsung Galaxy M21
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40
Motorola Moto G50
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Nokia G50
IPS, 1560x720, 6.82
Xiaomi Redmi 10
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Screen
-17%
-102%
-123%
-35%
Brightness middle
539
617
14%
340
-37%
568
5%
542
1%
Brightness
542
614
13%
325
-40%
525
-3%
518
-4%
Brightness Distribution
95
95
0%
92
-3%
85
-11%
93
-2%
Black Level *
0.18
0.24
0.22
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.21
2.11
-74%
4.75
-293%
5.31
-339%
3
-148%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.17
3.41
18%
7.53
-81%
9.04
-117%
6.7
-61%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
2.6
-73%
3.9
-160%
5.6
-273%
1.4
7%
Gamma
2.179 101%
2.073 106%
2.224 99%
2.517 87%
2.27 97%
CCT
6653 98%
6921 94%
7384 88%
7541 86%
6450 101%
Contrast
1889
2367
2464

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 123.2 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 123.2 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 123.2 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20917 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

我们观察到PWM的闪烁频率很低,这可能会导致头痛和类似问题。敏感的用户在完全承诺购买之前肯定应该测试一下屏幕。

根据我们的测量,色彩再现相当好,但你应该选择 "自然 "显示模式以获得最准确的色彩。另一方面,那些喜欢颜色更饱和、不关心准确色彩再现的人应该选择 "鲜艳"。我们使用CalMAN软件和一个分光光度计进行屏幕测试。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN色彩空间 Adobe RGB
CalMAN色彩空间 Adobe RGB
卡尔曼色彩空间DCI P3
卡尔曼色彩空间DCI P3
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.5 ms).

由于采用了AMOLED技术,你不必担心可视角度的问题。你可以从侧面看显示屏,没有颜色或亮度变化。

由于屏幕明亮,Galaxy M22在阴天的户外表现良好,但在阳光直射下,你可能会在阴凉处更好。

视角
视角
户外使用
户外使用

性能 - 整体上较慢

Helio G80 Galaxy M22中的Helio G80是否优于 三星Exynos 9611中的 Galaxy M21?好吧,Galaxy M22在纯粹的处理器基准测试中比它的前辈高出几个百分点,所以两者应该被认为是功能相同。

然而,在图形性能方面有很大差异。前代产品在这方面快了大约20-30%,所以Galaxy M22明显退步了。此外, 摩托G50诺基亚G50显著更快,但价格差不多。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
373 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
349 Points ∼57% -6%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
507 Points ∼83% +36%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
514 Points ∼84% +38%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
365 Points ∼60% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (345 - 387, n=7)
370 Points ∼61% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=267, last 2 years)
610 Points ∼100% +64%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1355 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1322 Points ∼64% -2%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1627 Points ∼79% +20%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1618 Points ∼78% +19%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1265 Points ∼61% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1281 - 1370, n=7)
1335 Points ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=267, last 2 years)
2069 Points ∼100% +53%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1154 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1208 Points ∼54% +5%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
999 Points ∼45% -13%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
925 Points ∼41% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1267 Points ∼57% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1109 - 1203, n=6)
1157 Points ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 7701, n=170, last 2 years)
2233 Points ∼100% +94%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1140 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1565 Points ∼69% +37%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1048 Points ∼46% -8%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1039 Points ∼46% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1223 Points ∼54% +7%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1121 - 1168, n=6)
1138 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=170, last 2 years)
2279 Points ∼100% +100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6172 Points ∼62%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
8351 Points ∼84% +35%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7111 Points ∼71% +15%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8842 Points ∼88% +43%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (5766 - 8120, n=5)
6486 Points ∼65% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=90, last 2 years)
9994 Points ∼100% +62%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1723 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2110 Points ∼59% +22%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3596 Points ∼100% +109%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3599 Points ∼100% +109%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1817 Points ∼50% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1536 - 1845, n=6)
1695 Points ∼47% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=226, last 2 years)
3598 Points ∼100% +109%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1589 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2092 Points ∼50% +32%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3767 Points ∼90% +137%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3792 Points ∼90% +139%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1709 Points ∼41% +8%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1369 - 1701, n=6)
1544 Points ∼37% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=226, last 2 years)
4194 Points ∼100% +164%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2442 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2176 Points ∼70% -11%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3103 Points ∼100% +27%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3054 Points ∼98% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2336 Points ∼75% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (2442 - 2686, n=6)
2602 Points ∼84% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (677 - 5301, n=226, last 2 years)
2896 Points ∼93% +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1779 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1662 Points ∼37% -7%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3647 Points ∼82% +105%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3666 Points ∼82% +106%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1833 Points ∼41% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1736 - 2054, n=6)
1810 Points ∼41% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=254, last 2 years)
4466 Points ∼100% +151%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1626 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1601 Points ∼28% -2%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3839 Points ∼66% +136%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3872 Points ∼67% +138%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1713 Points ∼30% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1578 - 1903, n=6)
1658 Points ∼29% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=254, last 2 years)
5783 Points ∼100% +256%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2650 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1917 Points ∼61% -28%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3103 Points ∼99% +17%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3091 Points ∼98% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2426 Points ∼77% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (2552 - 2846, n=6)
2669 Points ∼85% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=252, last 2 years)
3139 Points ∼100% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1351 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1563 Points ∼56% +16%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2478 Points ∼89% +83%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2476 Points ∼89% +83%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1394 Points ∼50% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1342 - 1361, n=6)
1354 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=223, last 2 years)
2780 Points ∼100% +106%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1195 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1445 Points ∼49% +21%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2338 Points ∼80% +96%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2346 Points ∼80% +96%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1250 Points ∼43% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1179 - 1202, n=6)
1193 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=223, last 2 years)
2940 Points ∼100% +146%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2487 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2186 Points ∼70% -12%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3136 Points ∼100% +26%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3071 Points ∼98% +23%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2339 Points ∼75% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (2487 - 2669, n=6)
2571 Points ∼82% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=223, last 2 years)
2920 Points ∼93% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1368 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1650 Points ∼45% +21%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2563 Points ∼70% +87%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2587 Points ∼70% +89%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1416 Points ∼39% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1347 - 1387, n=6)
1369 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=256, last 2 years)
3675 Points ∼100% +169%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1202 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1532 Points ∼36% +27%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2447 Points ∼57% +104%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2471 Points ∼57% +106%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1265 Points ∼29% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1179 - 1211, n=6)
1199 Points ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 16221, n=256, last 2 years)
4306 Points ∼100% +258%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2644 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2260 Points ∼71% -15%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3076 Points ∼97% +16%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3093 Points ∼98% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2427 Points ∼77% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (2644 - 2830, n=6)
2707 Points ∼85% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=256, last 2 years)
3167 Points ∼100% +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1388 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1550 Points ∼58% +12%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2284 Points ∼85% +65%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2332 Points ∼87% +68%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1396 Points ∼52% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1329 - 1398, n=6)
1376 Points ∼51% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=196, last 2 years)
2672 Points ∼100% +93%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1235 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1439 Points ∼48% +17%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2195 Points ∼73% +78%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2256 Points ∼75% +83%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1264 Points ∼42% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1174 - 1242, n=6)
1220 Points ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=196, last 2 years)
3006 Points ∼100% +143%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2445 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2125 Points ∼80% -13%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2664 Points ∼100% +9%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2646 Points ∼99% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2203 Points ∼83% -10%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (2423 - 2565, n=6)
2488 Points ∼93% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=196, last 2 years)
2652 Points ∼100% +8%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
689 Points ∼23%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
986 Points ∼33% +43%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
980 Points ∼33% +42%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
712 Points ∼24% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (679 - 691, n=5)
687 Points ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9680, n=134, last 2 years)
2955 Points ∼100% +329%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
685 Points ∼22%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
974 Points ∼32% +42%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
976 Points ∼32% +42%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
721 Points ∼24% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (174 - 686, n=5)
582 Points ∼19% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=131, last 2 years)
3058 Points ∼100% +346%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
176 Points ∼19%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
290 Points ∼32% +65%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
293 Points ∼32% +66%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
182 Points ∼20% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (174 - 686, n=5)
277 Points ∼30% +57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=82, last 2 years)
917 Points ∼100% +421%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
173 Points ∼18%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
284 Points ∼30% +64%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
288 Points ∼31% +66%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
181 Points ∼19% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (172 - 686, n=5)
275 Points ∼29% +59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 4236, n=81, last 2 years)
936 Points ∼100% +441%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
54 fps ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
31 fps ∼37% -43%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
84 fps ∼100% +56%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
42 fps ∼50% -22%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (54 - 59, n=3)
56 fps ∼67% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=205, last 2 years)
64.4 fps ∼77% +19%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
44 fps ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
35 fps ∼29% -20%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
81 fps ∼66% +84%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
46 fps ∼38% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (44 - 44, n=3)
44 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 417, n=205, last 2 years)
122 fps ∼100% +177%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
42 fps ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
19 fps ∼29% -55%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
66 fps ∼100% +57%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
18 fps ∼27% -57%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (42 - 43, n=3)
42.3 fps ∼64% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 121, n=204, last 2 years)
51.7 fps ∼78% +23%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
24 fps ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
18 fps ∼25% -25%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
41 fps ∼58% +71%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
25 fps ∼35% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (24 - 24, n=3)
24 fps ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 229, n=205, last 2 years)
70.6 fps ∼100% +194%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
30 fps ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼26% -53%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
53 fps ∼100% +77%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼25% -57%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (30 - 31, n=3)
30.3 fps ∼57% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=203, last 2 years)
40.2 fps ∼76% +34%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
15 fps ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16 fps ∼33% +7%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
29 fps ∼60% +93%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼33% +7%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (15 - 16, n=3)
15.3 fps ∼31% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 151, n=203, last 2 years)
48.6 fps ∼100% +224%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼32% -44%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
28 fps ∼100% +75%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.1 fps ∼33% -43%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (16 - 17, n=3)
16.3 fps ∼58% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 61, n=202, last 2 years)
25.2 fps ∼90% +58%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.3 fps ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼34% +8%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
16 fps ∼55% +72%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.6 fps ∼33% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (9.3 - 9.4, n=3)
9.33 fps ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=202, last 2 years)
29.3 fps ∼100% +215%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
17 fps ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.2 fps ∼31% -46%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
30 fps ∼100% +76%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
29 fps ∼97% +71%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9 fps ∼30% -47%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (8 - 18, n=6)
14.2 fps ∼47% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=267, last 2 years)
25.8 fps ∼86% +52%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.2 fps ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼33% +9%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
17 fps ∼56% +85%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
18 fps ∼59% +96%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.7 fps ∼32% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (8.9 - 9.2, n=6)
9.12 fps ∼30% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 257, n=267, last 2 years)
30.3 fps ∼100% +229%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.8 fps ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.6 fps ∼29% -43%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
19 fps ∼100% +94%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
18 fps ∼95% +84%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5.9 fps ∼31% -40%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (5.1 - 11, n=6)
8.38 fps ∼44% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 60, n=268, last 2 years)
17.3 fps ∼91% +77%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.3 fps ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼30% +6%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6.4 fps ∼55% +94%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6.5 fps ∼56% +97%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.5 fps ∼30% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (3.2 - 3.3, n=6)
3.28 fps ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 101, n=268, last 2 years)
11.7 fps ∼100% +255%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
204040 Points ∼40%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
286457 Points ∼57% +40%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (204040 - 204547, n=2)
204294 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (117053 - 815441, n=70, last 2 years)
504373 Points ∼100% +147%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
177851 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
180019 Points ∼50% +1%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
257336 Points ∼72% +45%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
185120 Points ∼52% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (177851 - 181928, n=3)
180233 Points ∼50% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=177, last 2 years)
357821 Points ∼100% +101%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7292 Points ∼11%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4787 Points ∼7% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7120 Points ∼11% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (7242 - 7292, n=2)
7267 Points ∼11% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 264766, n=93, last 2 years)
66772 Points ∼100% +816%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2400 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2133 Points ∼54% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2247 Points ∼57% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (2216 - 2400, n=4)
2309 Points ∼59% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (615 - 8124, n=191, last 2 years)
3935 Points ∼100% +64%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5452 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4586 Points ∼64% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4065 Points ∼57% -25%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (4516 - 5452, n=4)
5047 Points ∼71% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 19657, n=191, last 2 years)
7133 Points ∼100% +31%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3101 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1759 Points ∼38% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3204 Points ∼69% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (2542 - 3101, n=4)
2785 Points ∼60% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=191, last 2 years)
4628 Points ∼100% +49%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1800 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2138 Points ∼34% +19%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1878 Points ∼30% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1735 - 1811, n=4)
1776 Points ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 25642, n=191, last 2 years)
6256 Points ∼100% +248%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1090 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1200 Points ∼90% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1042 Points ∼78% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio G80
  (1090 - 1243, n=4)
1161 Points ∼87% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=191, last 2 years)
1332 Points ∼100% +22%

另一方面,在网上冲浪时,三星Galaxy M22的表现与同类产品相当,在大多数基准测试中甚至比其前辈略快。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182, n=184, last 2 years)
55.1 Points ∼100% +56%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
46.02 Points ∼84% +30%
Samsung Galaxy M22 (Chrome 96)
35.314 Points ∼64%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (29 - 35.3, n=4)
31.6 Points ∼57% -11%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
30.642 Points ∼56% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
28.585 Points ∼52% -19%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=192, last 2 years)
101 Points ∼100% +66%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
78.6 Points ∼78% +29%
Samsung Galaxy M22 (Chrome 96)
60.769 Points ∼60%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (54 - 60.8, n=4)
56.2 Points ∼56% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
50.172 Points ∼50% -17%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
49.497 Points ∼49% -19%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=169, last 2 years)
54.2 runs/min ∼100% +86%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chome 91)
38.4 runs/min ∼71% +32%
Samsung Galaxy M22 (Chome 96)
29.1 runs/min ∼54%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (27.7 - 29.1, n=4)
28.5 runs/min ∼53% -2%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chome 85)
26.6 runs/min ∼49% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
24.4 runs/min ∼45% -16%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 252, n=197, last 2 years)
83.5 Points ∼100% +55%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
72 Points ∼86% +33%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
55 Points ∼66% +2%
Samsung Galaxy M22 (Chrome 96)
54 Points ∼65%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (43 - 54, n=4)
48.3 Points ∼58% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
48 Points ∼57% -11%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 64222, n=203, last 2 years)
19795 Points ∼100% +63%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
15861 Points ∼80% +31%
Samsung Galaxy M22 (Chrome 96)
12127 Points ∼61%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (10432 - 12127, n=4)
11089 Points ∼56% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
10625 Points ∼54% -12%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
9810 Points ∼50% -19%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
4664.3 ms * ∼100% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
3705.6 ms * ∼79% -14%
Average Mediatek Helio G80 (3256 - 4076, n=4)
3655 ms * ∼78% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 29635, n=205, last 2 years)
3599 ms * ∼77% -11%
Samsung Galaxy M22 (Chrome 96)
3255.6 ms * ∼70%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
2694.4 ms * ∼58% +17%

* ... smaller is better

在存储基准中,性能的退步也很明显。这是因为Galaxy M22提供128GB的慢速eMMC闪存。前代产品使用更快的UFS内存。

Samsung Galaxy M22Samsung Galaxy M21Motorola Moto G50Nokia G50Xiaomi Redmi 10Average 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
43%
30%
114%
11%
-12%
111%
Sequential Read 256KB
292
487.8
67%
392
34%
514.6
76%
321.32
10%
285 ?(107 - 501, n=46)
-2%
845 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=270, last 2 years)
189%
Sequential Write 256KB
187.8
192.7
3%
204.4
9%
486.6
159%
178.03
-5%
194 ?(90 - 314, n=46)
3%
387 ?(11.9 - 1321, n=270, last 2 years)
106%
Random Read 4KB
99.7
126
26%
89.2
-11%
182
83%
100.68
1%
82.5 ?(20.7 - 247, n=46)
-17%
148 ?(13.5 - 325, n=270, last 2 years)
48%
Random Write 4KB
70.2
124.2
77%
131.7
88%
166.5
137%
95.8
36%
49.1 ?(8.48 - 160, n=46)
-30%
140 ?(5.5 - 330, n=270, last 2 years)
99%

游戏 - 60 FPS现在可以实现,然后

在游戏时,考虑到其价格,Galaxy M22表现良好。它在Armajet中平均能达到57FPS。然而,这款手机远远没有达到屏幕所能显示的90FPS的水平。

在要求更高的《PUBG移动版》中,低设置下的帧率约为40 FPS,高设置下则低于30 FPS。帧率下降是非常罕见的。我们在GameBench的帮助下捕捉帧率数据。.

通过触摸屏进行控制没有任何问题。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø56.5 (48-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.7.0: Ø39.8 (35-41)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.7.0: Ø29.6 (23-32)

排放 - 良好的音质

温度

Galaxy 智能手机在持续负荷下当然会发热。我们在背面测得的温度高达42.9℃(109°F)。这本身没有问题,但它是明显的。不过,在环境温度较高的环境中,智能手机会变得更热。

正如我们的3DMark Wild Life压力测试结果所示,SoC的性能并没有下降。

Max. Load
 41.6 °C37.7 °C33.7 °C 
 42.1 °C37.5 °C34.4 °C 
 41.9 °C36.8 °C33.7 °C 
Maximum: 42.1 °C
Average: 37.7 °C
31.6 °C37.5 °C38.9 °C
32.9 °C37.7 °C42.3 °C
32.9 °C37.3 °C42.9 °C
Maximum: 42.9 °C
Average: 37.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Moto G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.4 (981min) % ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.2 (4.26min) % ∼99% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.1 % ∼99%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Moto G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99 (289min) % ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.9 (1.09min) % ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M22
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
97.7 % ∼99%
00.20.40.70.91.11.31.51.722.22.42.62.833.33.53.73.94.1Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø1.096 (1.09-1.102)
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.32 (4.26-4.34)
热量分布 - 前面
热量分布 - 前面
热量分布 - 背面
热量分布 - 背面

发言人

Galaxy M22的小型单声道扬声器变得相当响亮,仍然能够提供不失真的声音。声音缺乏低音,但总的来说,该扬声器相当适合听音乐。

该智能手机可以通过蓝牙使用aptX进行音频传输,但不能使用更高质量的编解码器,如aptX HD或aptX Adaptive。那些喜欢通过电缆连接耳机的人将发现Galaxy M22的3.5毫米插孔相当有用。无线和有线的声音传输效果都很好。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.941.82544.746.4313433.74036.837.85042.641.96337.336.18026.224.610028.327.512522.422.716018.935.92001643.825014.548.831513.255.94001361.550016.56663019.567.280019.666.6100017.469.4125015.373.4160015.377.1200015.778.5250016.577.8315017.975.7400020.86650002267.4630020.971.1800021.770.91000022.872.4125002261.21600022.560.7SPL31.585.8N1.461median 18.9median 66.6Delta39.138.941.436.838.333.135.132.935.235.337.328.728.119.121.820.421.620.519.317.227.314.237.314.545.814.550.812.85413.456.813.661.718.966.218.672.621.273.714.975.214.174.414.672.614.769.415.566.616.263.11766.81875.518.876.619.663.220.549.562.158.42983.814.110.61.154.2median 16.2median 63.22.512.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy M22Samsung Galaxy M21
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy M22 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy M21 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 - 尽管削减了电池尺寸,但电池运行时间很长

能源消耗

三星Galaxy M22是相当节能的。在这方面,它比前代产品有明显的优势。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.5 / 0.9 / 1.6 Watt
Load midlight 3.1 / 5.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy M22
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M21
6000 mAh
Motorola Moto G50
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 10
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G80
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-85%
-35%
-40%
-46%
-59%
Idle Minimum *
0.5
1.2
-140%
0.9
-80%
0.53
-6%
0.943 ?(0.37 - 1.5, n=4)
-89%
0.933 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=215, last 2 years)
-87%
Idle Average *
0.9
1.8
-100%
1.5
-67%
2.01
-123%
1.58 ?(0.9 - 2.1, n=4)
-76%
1.774 ?(0.65 - 3.94, n=215, last 2 years)
-97%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
2.1
-31%
1.9
-19%
2.02
-26%
1.973 ?(1.6 - 2.5, n=4)
-23%
2 ?(0.69 - 4.01, n=215, last 2 years)
-25%
Load Average *
3.1
6.2
-100%
3.5
-13%
4.11
-33%
3.83 ?(2.9 - 5.7, n=4)
-24%
4.43 ?(2.1 - 8.4, n=215, last 2 years)
-43%
Load Maximum *
5.2
7.9
-52%
4.9
6%
5.76
-11%
6.13 ?(4.9 - 8.5, n=4)
-18%
7.33 ?(3.56 - 12.3, n=215, last 2 years)
-41%

* ... smaller is better

Power Draw: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
: Ø4.48 (2.34-7.9)

Power Draw: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.30.50.70.911.21.41.61.71.92.12.22.42.62.82.93.13.3Tooltip
; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.8 (1.776-3.46)
; Idle 1min: Ø0.756 (0.582-1.886)

电池寿命

由于其能源效率,Galaxy M22从一个明显较小的电池中获得了体面的电池运行时间。M22只有5000毫安时的电池,比M21的电池小1000毫安时。 Galaxy M21.总而言之,这款新的Galaxy 手机有一个好的公司。所有的对比设备也都有5000毫安时的电池。

在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,这款手机持续了18小时46分钟,这意味着它在适度使用的情况下应该能够持续2天。另一方面,在空闲和负载情况下,与竞争对手相比,该智能手机的结果相当平庸。然而,电池运行时间仍处于良好水平,差异很少是巨大的。

三星的Galaxy M22的充电功率高达25W,但盒子里只包括一个15W的充电器。因此,充电有时需要大大超过2小时。使用能力更强的电源适配器,充电速度会快得多。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
36h 56min
WiFi Websurfing
18h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 26min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 57min
Samsung Galaxy M22
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M21
6000 mAh
Motorola Moto G50
5000 mAh
Nokia G50
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 10
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
5%
14%
-14%
-6%
Reader / Idle
2216
2297
4%
3026
37%
2356
6%
H.264
1286
1352
5%
1302
1%
1002
-22%
WiFi v1.3
1126
1298
15%
1198
6%
972
-14%
858
-24%
Load
297
289
-3%
326
10%
341
15%

Pros

+ 明亮的90-Hz AMOLED屏幕
+ 良好的色彩还原度
+ 没有节流现象
+ 不错的扬声器
+ 良好的电池寿命
+ 快速而准确的指纹识别传感器

Cons

- 慢速记忆
- 低频率的PWM
- 变得相当热
- 没有4K视频记录
- 没有5G
- 只配备15W的充电器
- 过时的安全补丁

结论--典型的退化现象

对三星Galaxy M22的评论。
对三星Galaxy M22的评论。

三星Galaxy M22是三星中端系列的一个奇怪的新设备。大量的内部存储器,这只是eMMC,90Hz的显示屏,但分辨率很低,新的SoC,在某些方面比前代产品慢。如果你看一下 Galaxy M21,你会发现,Galaxy M22的电池更小。然而,这两款智能手机的重量是差不多的。

90赫兹的AMOLED屏幕是三星Galaxy M22的头条特征,但你必须在其他方面为它付出代价。

基本上每一个变化都会在人的嘴里留下不好的味道。看看竞争对手,你应该知道,你已经可以用同样的钱买到一部5G智能手机。在这里,我们谈论的是摩托G50诺基亚G50.上述两款智能手机的性能水平也相当高。

Galaxy M22是一款价格低廉且相对紧凑的手机,拥有90Hz的AMOLED屏幕和良好的电池寿命。相机还不错,Wi-Fi速度快,Galaxy M22的SoC也不节操。那些可以不使用5G并且不喜欢IPS屏幕的人绝对应该考虑一下Galaxy M22。这款手机 Galaxy M21在某些方面提供了更多服务,但不幸的是,现在很难买到。

价格和可用性

三星Galaxy M22目前在以下网站没有库存 亚马逊.

Samsung Galaxy M22 - 12/08/2021 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
47 / 70 → 66%
Weight
89%
Battery
92%
Display
88%
Games Performance
15 / 64 → 24%
Application Performance
59 / 86 → 68%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
68 / 90 → 76%
Camera
57%
Average
73%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 214745 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!