Notebookcheck Logo

PowerVR GE8320

Imagination Technologies的PowerVR GE8320是一款用于中端ARM SoC的集成图形卡。它属于Series8XE系列的GPU（GE8xx0），支持OpenGL ES 3.2、OpenCL 1.2、Android NN HAL API和Vulkan 1.0。

PowerVR Series8XE Series

PowerVR GE8320 @ 0.65 GHz
PowerVR GE8300 @ 0.66 GHz
PowerVR GE8100 @ 0.57 GHz
ArchitecturePowerVR Series8XE
Core Speed650 MHz
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 10, OpenGL 3.x, 4.x, OpenGL ES 3.0
technology20 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 1.2, Android NN HAL API Support
Date of Announcement09.09.2014
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.imgtec.com/powervr-gpu/ge8320/
CPU in PowerVR GE8320GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek Helio G378 x 1800 MHz? MHz680 MHz
Mediatek Helio G358 x 2300 MHz? MHz680 MHz
Mediatek MT87688 x 1500 MHz? MHz650 MHz
» show 6 more
min. - max.? - 650 MHz? - 680 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 6785     avg: 11520     median: 11994 (1%)     max: 13939 Points
+ 41 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 6867     avg: 7128     median: 7128 (1%)     max: 7389 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
9534 Points (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 494     avg: 802     median: 810 (4%)     max: 1214 Points
+ 59 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 445     avg: 747     median: 764 (2%)     max: 871 Points
+ 59 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 302     avg: 497.5     median: 493 (3%)     max: 1166 Points
+ 58 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 253     avg: 422.8     median: 426.5 (0%)     max: 516 Points
+ 58 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
ARM Mali-T720
91.7 -78%
...
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
114.4 -73%
Qualcomm Adreno 504
210 -50%
ARM Mali-T830 MP1
236 -44%
PowerVR GE8300
258.1 -39%
Qualcomm Adreno 505
309.7 -27%
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
319.9 -24%
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
327.9 -22%
Qualcomm Adreno 405
355.3 -16%
PowerVR GE8322 / IMG8322
387.7 -8%
PowerVR GE8320
422.8
Qualcomm Adreno 506
433.9 3%
ARM Mali-G71 MP2
443.3 5%
PowerVR GX6250
614 45%
ARM Mali-T880 MP2
620 47%
ARM Mali-T830 MP3
643 52%
ARM Mali-G52 MP1
766 81%
Qualcomm Adreno 508
797 89%
ARM Mali-T880 MP4
816 93%
ARM Mali-G57 MP1
840 99%
...
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
25707 5980%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
0 Points (0%)
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
0 Points (0%)
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 18     avg: 25.9     median: 26 (1%)     max: 31 fps
+ 28 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 13     avg: 19.6     median: 20 (0%)     max: 23 fps
+ 28 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
min: 9.1     avg: 16.5     median: 17 (5%)     max: 20 fps
+ 28 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 6.3     avg: 10.2     median: 10 (1%)     max: 12 fps
+ 28 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.62     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (0%)     max: 0.65 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
min: 2.1     avg: 4.2     median: 4.4 (1%)     max: 5.2 fps
+ 59 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.85     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (0%)     max: 1.6 fps
+ 59 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
PowerVR GE8100
0.314 -78%
...
ARM Mali-T830 MP1
0.63 -55%
Qualcomm Adreno 504
0.8 -43%
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
0.836 -40%
PowerVR GE8300
0.8676 -38%
Qualcomm Adreno 405
1 -28%
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
1.02 -27%
Qualcomm Adreno 505
1.096 -21%
PowerVR GE8322 / IMG8322
1.183 -15%
Qualcomm Adreno 506
1.22 -13%
PowerVR GE8320
1.396
ARM Mali-T880 MP2
1.5 7%
ARM Mali-G71 MP2
1.629 17%
ARM Mali-G57 MP1
1.808 30%
Qualcomm Adreno 508
1.825 31%
ARM Mali-G52 MP1
2.113 51%
Qualcomm Adreno 509
2.356 69%
ARM Mali-T880 MP4
2.467 77%
Qualcomm Adreno 610
2.761 98%
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
2.913 109%
...
Apple M2 8-Core GPU
91 6419%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
min: 1.5     avg: 6.7     median: 7 (1%)     max: 8.1 fps
+ 59 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 2.3     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (0%)     max: 7.4 fps
+ 59 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
min: 2.8     avg: 4.6     median: 4.9 (0%)     max: 5.7 fps
+ 28 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 1.8     avg: 3     median: 2.8 (0%)     max: 6.1 fps
+ 28 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 15496     avg: 15903     median: 15557 (2%)     max: 16655 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
0 fps (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2578     avg: 8110     median: 8329.5 (8%)     max: 13202 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 575     avg: 1986     median: 1912.5 (3%)     max: 3544 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 1.84     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (1%)     max: 2.91 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
00.20.40.60.811.21.41.71.92.12.32.52.72.93.13.33.53.73.9Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
42  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
48  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
24 30 33.5 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
22 24 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
22 23 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
0 (!) 0 (!) ~ 0 fps    + Compare
ultra
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
30 31 31 56 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
29 30 31 43 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
47 58 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
57  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
high
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
10 19 27 28 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
12 22 24 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
24 24 26 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.22
log 21. 02:04:41

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 Mar 2023 13:23:48 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.028s ... 0.029s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#5 composed specs +0s ... 0.029s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9411 +0.016s ... 0.046s

#9 got single benchmarks 9411 +0.187s ... 0.232s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.232s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.128s ... 0.36s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.014s ... 0.374s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.087s ... 0.461s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.482s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.482s

#16 Got 53 rows for game benchmarks. +0.027s ... 0.51s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.51s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.514s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.113s ... 0.627s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 0.629s

#21 return log +0s ... 0.629s

Notebook reviews with PowerVR GE8320 graphics card

联想Tab M8 2022 (第三代)

联想Tab M8 2022（第三代）LTE评测--小型平板电脑还是巨型智能手机？

第三代联想Tab M8采用方便的8英寸格式，不仅非常适合儿童使用，如果需要，用户甚至可以用它来打电话。这款价格低廉的平板电脑是否也能很好地应对日常使用呢？...
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T | PowerVR GE8320 | 8.00" | 305 g
摩托罗拉Moto E22i

摩托罗拉Moto E22i智能手机评测--花小钱办大事的特别手机

摩托罗拉显然是想为入门级产品加点料。Moto E22i看起来很时尚，有防尘功能，甚至配备了立体声扬声器。阅读我们的评论，了解缓慢的SoC是否破坏了手机的乐趣。...
Mediatek Helio G37 | PowerVR GE8320 | 6.50" | 169 g
Ulefone Armor 15智能手机评测--带耳机的坚固户外手机

Ulefone Armor 15智能手机评测--带耳机的坚固户外手机

Ulefone Armor 15具有抗摔和防水功能，甚至还配备了自己的完全无线入耳式耳机。因此，制造商将尺寸和重量都推到了极致，但却推出了一个全面的整体包装--价格还算合理。...
Mediatek Helio G35 | PowerVR GE8320 | 5.45" | 346 g
摩托罗拉Moto E32s

摩托罗拉Moto E32s智能手机评测--低性能入门级机型，有设备奖励

摩托E32s提供快速的Wi-Fi，拥有90赫兹的屏幕，并且可以持续很长时间。然而，这款入门级的手机也不得不在性能上做文章。它还值得再看看吗？...
Mediatek Helio G37 | PowerVR GE8320 | 6.50" | 185 g
测试摩托罗拉Moto G22

摩托罗拉Moto G22评测 - 廉价的预算智能手机，有严重的假象

Moto G22的主要优势在于其价格。不到170欧元（约180美元）就有NFC、50MP摄像头和90Hz面板。摩托罗拉还在其入门级手机中关注最新的Android ，并改进了数据保护功能。尽管存在一些缺点，但计算结果是否可行？...
Mediatek Helio G37 | PowerVR GE8320 | 6.50" | 185 g

Xiaomi Redmi 9C: Mediatek Helio G35, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  Review » 小米红米9C智能手机评论。大量的内存？是的!大量的电源？不是!

Samsung Galaxy A03s: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy A03s智能手机评论。便宜的手机，良好的通话质量

Oppo A16s: Mediatek Helio G35, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo A16s智能手机评测--价格低廉的耐力跑，带NFC功能

Blackview Tab 10: Mediatek MT8768, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  Review » Blackview Tab 10平板电脑评测：Android 11，仅售190美元

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite: Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, 8.70", 0.4 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy Tab A7 Lite平板电脑评测：非常实惠的迷你版三星平板电脑

Motorola Moto E6s: Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Moto E6s智能手机评测：就是台便宜的手机

Xiaomi Redmi 6A: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, 5.45", 0.1 kg
  Review » 小米红米6A智能手机评测

TCL 403: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, 6.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 403

TCL 40 SE: Mediatek Helio G37, 6.75", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 40 SE

Oukitel RT3: Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, 8.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Oukitel RT3

Samsung Galaxy F04: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy F04

Cubot Note 30: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Cubot Note 30

TCL Nxtpaper 12 Pro: unknown, 12.20", 0.6 kg
  External Review » TCL Nxtpaper 12 Pro

Samsung Galaxy M04: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M04

TCL 408: Mediatek Helio G25, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 408

Honor X7a: Mediatek Helio G37, 6.75", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X7a

Doogee S51: Mediatek Helio G25, 6.00", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Doogee S51

Motorola Moto G Play 2023: Mediatek Helio G37, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Play 2023

TCL 405: Mediatek Helio G25, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 405

TCL 30 XL: Mediatek Helio A25, 6.82", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 30 XL

Cubot P60: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Cubot P60

TCL 306: Mediatek Helio G25, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 306

Honor X6: Mediatek Helio G25, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X6

Infinix Hot 20 Play: Mediatek Helio G37, 6.82", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Hot 20 Play

Infinix Hot 20i: Mediatek Helio G25, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Hot 20i

Wiko 10: Mediatek Helio G37, 6.75", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Wiko 10

Wiko T3: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, 6.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Wiko T3

Motorola Moto E22i: Mediatek Helio G37, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto E22i

Motorola Moto E22: Mediatek Helio G37, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto E22

Motorola Moto E22s: Mediatek Helio G37, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto E22s

Ulefone Power Armor X11 Pro: Mediatek Helio G25, 5.45", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Power Armor X11 Pro

Samsung Galaxy A04e: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A04e

Oppo A17k: Mediatek Helio G35, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A17k

Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro: Mediatek Helio G25, 5.93", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro

TCL Tab 10 HD 4G: Mediatek MT8768, 10.10", 0.4 kg
  External Review » TCL Tab 10 HD 4G

Oppo A17: Mediatek Helio G35, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review