Notebookcheck Logo

PowerVR GE8320

Imagination Technologies的PowerVR GE8320是一款用于中端ARM SoC的集成图形卡。它属于Series8XE系列的GPU(GE8xx0),支持OpenGL ES 3.2、OpenCL 1.2、Android NN HAL API和Vulkan 1.0。

PowerVR Series8XE Series

PowerVR GE8320 @ 0.4 - 0.65 GHz
PowerVR GE8300 @ 0.66 GHz
PowerVR GE8100 @ 0.57 GHz
ArchitecturePowerVR Series8XE
Core Speed400 - 650 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 10, OpenGL 3.x, 4.x, OpenGL ES 3.0
technology20 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 1.2, Android NN HAL API Support
Date of Announcement09.09.2014
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.imgtec.com
CPU in PowerVR GE8320GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek Helio G378 x 1800 MHz? MHz680 MHz
Mediatek Helio G358 x 2300 MHz? MHz680 MHz
Mediatek Helio G368 x 2200 MHz? MHz680 MHz
min. - max.? - 650 MHz? - 680 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 6785     avg: 11520     median: 11994 (1%)     max: 13939 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 6867     avg: 7128     median: 7128 (1%)     max: 7389 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
9534 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 494     avg: 806     median: 812 (4%)     max: 1214 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 445     avg: 750     median: 765 (2%)     max: 881 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 302     avg: 499     median: 493 (2%)     max: 1166 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 253     avg: 424.3     median: 428 (1%)     max: 516 Points
ARM Mali-T720
91.7 -78%
...
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
114.4 -73%
Qualcomm Adreno 504
210 -51%
ARM Mali-T830 MP1
236 -44%
PowerVR GE8300
258.1 -39%
Qualcomm Adreno 505
309.7 -27%
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
319.9 -25%
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
327.9 -23%
Qualcomm Adreno 405
355.3 -16%
PowerVR GE8322 / IMG8322
387.7 -9%
PowerVR GE8320
424.3
Qualcomm Adreno 506
433.9 2%
ARM Mali-G71 MP2
443.3 4%
PowerVR GX6250
614 45%
ARM Mali-T880 MP2
620 46%
ARM Mali-T830 MP3
643 52%
ARM Mali-G52 MP1
766 81%
Qualcomm Adreno 508
797 88%
816 92%
Qualcomm Adreno 509
841 98%
...
25785 5977%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
0 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.6     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (0%)     max: 0.65 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.85     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (0%)     max: 1.6 fps
PowerVR GE8100
0.314 -78%
...
ARM Mali-T830 MP1
0.63 -55%
Qualcomm Adreno 504
0.8 -43%
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
0.836 -40%
PowerVR GE8300
0.8694 -38%
Qualcomm Adreno 405
1 -29%
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
1.02 -27%
Qualcomm Adreno 505
1.096 -22%
PowerVR GE8322 / IMG8322
1.183 -16%
Qualcomm Adreno 506
1.22 -13%
PowerVR GE8320
1.402
ARM Mali-T880 MP2
1.5 7%
ARM Mali-G71 MP2
1.629 16%
Qualcomm Adreno 508
1.825 30%
ARM Mali-G57 MP1
2.072 48%
ARM Mali-G52 MP1
2.113 51%
Qualcomm Adreno 509
2.356 68%
2.467 76%
2.817 101%
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
2.913 108%
...
Apple M3 10-Core GPU
118.5 8352%
max:
536 38131%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 2.3     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (0%)     max: 7.4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 1.8     avg: 3     median: 2.9 (0%)     max: 6.1 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 3.7     avg: 6.6     median: 6.7 (0%)     max: 8.3 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 6.3     avg: 10.4     median: 10.5 (1%)     max: 12 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 13     avg: 19.9     median: 20 (0%)     max: 23 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 15496     avg: 16406     median: 16655 (2%)     max: 17214 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
0 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
0 points (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
0 points (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2578     avg: 7793     median: 6525 (7%)     max: 13202 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 575     avg: 2322     median: 2965 (5%)     max: 3666 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 1.84     avg: 2.3     median: 2.2 (1%)     max: 2.91 Watt
00.20.40.60.811.21.41.71.92.12.32.52.72.93.13.33.53.73.9Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
42  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
48  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
15  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
24 30 33.5 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
22 24 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
22 23 24 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
0 (!) 0 (!) ~ 0 fps    + Compare
ultra
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
30 31 31 56 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
29 30 31 43 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
47 58 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
57  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
28  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
21 30 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
10 19 27 28 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
12 22 24 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
24 24 26 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
44.5 59 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift42
Call of Duty Mobile48
Genshin Impact15
Armajet29
PUBG Mobile25240
Arena of Valor3733
Shadow Fight 35357
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne2826
Asphalt 9: Legends2119
Real Racing 325
Temple Run 252
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4
4

1


4
3


1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 22. 02:31:23

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 21 Apr 2024 19:16:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.082s ... 0.083s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.083s

#5 composed specs +0s ... 0.083s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.083s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.083s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9411 +0.018s ... 0.102s

#9 got single benchmarks 9411 +0.244s ... 0.345s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.345s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.209s ... 0.555s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.021s ... 0.576s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.105s ... 0.68s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.009s ... 0.689s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.009s ... 0.698s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.739s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.739s

#18 Got 62 rows for game benchmarks. +0.042s ... 0.782s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.782s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.788s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.247s ... 1.035s

#22 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.038s

#23 return log +0s ... 1.038s

Notebook reviews with PowerVR GE8320 graphics card

联想 Tab M8 2024

联想 Tab M8(第 4 代)2024 评测--电池寿命超长的迷你平板电脑

联想 Tab M8(Gen 4)2024 是一款适合成人和儿童使用的便捷多媒体平板电脑,在我们的评测中,它出色的电池续航能力给我们留下了深刻印象。请继续阅读我们的评测,看看这款售价 119 美元的 8 英寸平板电脑最适合哪些人使用。...
Mediatek MT8768 | PowerVR GE8320 | 8.00" | 320 g
小米红米A2

小米红米A2评测--廉价手机中的妥协

小米红米A2在互联网上的售价远低于100欧元。对于这样一款廉价智能手机,您还能期待什么呢?毕竟,制造商承诺定期更新和长时间运行。我们将在评测中对这款入门级手机进行更深入的了解。...
Mediatek Helio G36 | PowerVR GE8320 | 6.52" | 192 g
Honor X7a

Honor X7a智能手机评测--低价手机中的灵活摄像头

在一部售价低于200欧元(约218美元)的手机中配备一个广角摄像头并不是理所当然的事。Honor X7a有一个,但由于其缓慢的处理器,它可能也有一些缺点。我们在测试中仔细看看。...
Mediatek Helio G37 | PowerVR GE8320 | 6.74" | 196 g
联想Tab M8 2022 (第三代)

联想Tab M8 2022(第三代)LTE评测--小型平板电脑还是巨型智能手机?

第三代联想Tab M8采用方便的8英寸格式,不仅非常适合儿童使用,如果需要,用户甚至可以用它来打电话。这款价格低廉的平板电脑是否也能很好地应对日常使用呢?...
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T | PowerVR GE8320 | 8.00" | 305 g
摩托罗拉Moto E22i

摩托罗拉Moto E22i智能手机评测--花小钱办大事的特别手机

摩托罗拉显然是想为入门级产品加点料。Moto E22i看起来很时尚,有防尘功能,甚至配备了立体声扬声器。阅读我们的评论,了解缓慢的SoC是否破坏了手机的乐趣。...
Mediatek Helio G37 | PowerVR GE8320 | 6.50" | 169 g

Ulefone Armor 15: Mediatek Helio G35, 5.45", 0.3 kg
  Review » Ulefone Armor 15智能手机评测--带耳机的坚固户外手机

Motorola Moto E32s: Mediatek Helio G37, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Moto E32s智能手机评测--低性能入门级机型,有设备奖励

Motorola Moto G22: Mediatek Helio G37, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Moto G22评测 - 廉价的预算智能手机,有严重的假象

Xiaomi Redmi 9C: Mediatek Helio G35, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  Review » 小米红米9C智能手机评论。大量的内存?是的!大量的电源?不是!

Samsung Galaxy A03s: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy A03s智能手机评论。便宜的手机,良好的通话质量

Oppo A16s: Mediatek Helio G35, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo A16s智能手机评测--价格低廉的耐力跑,带NFC功能

Blackview Tab 10: Mediatek MT8768, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  Review » Blackview Tab 10平板电脑评测:Android 11,仅售190美元

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite: Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, 8.70", 0.4 kg
  Review » 三星Galaxy Tab A7 Lite平板电脑评测:非常实惠的迷你版三星平板电脑

Motorola Moto E6s: Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Moto E6s智能手机评测:就是台便宜的手机

Xiaomi Redmi 6A: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, 5.45", 0.1 kg
  Review »