Notebookcheck Logo

小米红米10智能手机评论。具有NFC和90赫兹的良好预算手机

用很少的钱买了很多智能手机。 小米红米10起价不到200欧元(约231美元),但这并不妨碍它在功能方面的包装。这款6.5英寸的手机配备了90赫兹显示屏,以及NFC、5000万像素摄像头、5000毫安时电池和立体声扬声器。联发科SoC Helio G88甚至确保了良好的日常和游戏性能。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen

小米在红米10上很有竞争力,因为这款6.5英寸的智能手机可以以低于200欧元(约231美元)的价格购买。红米9的继任者拥有扎实的配置,联发科Helio G88 ,4GB内存,最高128GB存储,以及支持18瓦快速充电的5000毫安时电池。我们评测的是64GB版本,小米在其网上商店提供的价格约为180欧元(约208美元)。

红米10不支持5G,但它提供了两个功能,希望将智能手机从大众中区分出来。一个5000万像素的主摄像头和一个90赫兹的刷新率。然而,这些并不是低预算领域的独特卖点,这就是为什么小米从一开始就必须与强大的对手竞争。继续阅读,看看它在测试中的表现如何。

Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Redmi 10 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G88 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 41.6 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 512 GB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity sensor, gyroscope, electronic compass, IR blaster, FM Radio, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Full
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (B2/3/5/8), 3G (B1/2/4/5/8), 4G (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28/32//B38/40/41/66), Head SAR 0.586 W/kg, Body SAR 0.978 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.92 x 161.95 x 75.53
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix 50 MP (f/1.8); 8 MP ultra-wide camera (f/2.2, FOV 120°); 2 MP macro camera (f/2.4); 2 MP depth sensor (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 8 MP f/2.0
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: onscreen, 22.5-watt charger, USB-C cable, SIM tool, protective case, Quick start guide, warranty card, MIUI 12.5, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
181 g, Power Supply: 62 g
Price
180 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
79 %
11/2021
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2
181 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"2400x1080
79.2 %
06/2021
Motorola Moto G50
SD 480, Adreno 619
192 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720
76.4 %
09/2021
Nokia G20
Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320
197 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
77 %
11/2021
Oppo A16s
Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320
190 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.52"1600x720
79.6 %
08/2021
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
203 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2400x1080

外壳 - 红米10的大猩猩玻璃3

红米10的外壳是由塑料制成的,但它的结构非常好,比其价格所显示的具有更高质量的外观和感觉。稳定性也很好,因为在测试中,智能手机经受住了扭曲的尝试,没有任何声音。只有后盖可以在中心位置稍微压紧。然而,这一切都没有到达显示屏,因为没有造成图像伪影。

红米10的正面有一层大猩猩3号玻璃保护,它在一个冲孔中放置了一个800万像素的自拍相机。由于其磨砂表面处理,后盖不太容易沾染指纹。同时,它为手指提供了轻微的阻力,因此,即使没有保护壳,智能手机也可以相当安全地握在手中。

小米手机的重量为181克,比许多具有相同外形的竞争对手略轻。红米9的前辈明显更重,为198克。由于带有5000万像素主摄像头的四摄像头设置从后盖突出几毫米,建议将智能手机放在附带的透明保护壳中,否则放在桌子上会有很大的晃动。

小米红米10有三种颜色版本。碳灰、鹅卵石白和海蓝。它没有IP认证。

Size comparison

167.2 mm 76.4 mm 9 mm 203 g164.9 mm 76 mm 9.2 mm 197 g164.9 mm 74.9 mm 9 mm 192 g163.8 mm 75.6 mm 8.4 mm 190 g161.95 mm 75.53 mm 8.92 mm 181 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 3.5毫米音频插孔,NFC,以及真正的双SIM卡功能

小米提供红米10的两个存储版本。4GB LPDDR4x内存和64GB eMMC 5.1闪存,在小米在线商店的价格约为180欧元(约208美元)。这款4G智能手机的更大存储量版本有128GB,价格为200欧元(约231美元)。

有了NFC、3.5毫米音频插孔、红外辐射器和双卡,你就得到了一个坚实的配置。卡槽可以同时容纳两张nano SIM卡和一张高达512GB的microSD卡。USB-C端口以USB 2.0的速度运行。

左图:双卡双待和微型SD
左图:双卡双待和微型SD
右边。音量摇杆,带指纹识别器的电源按钮
右边。音量摇杆,带指纹识别器的电源按钮
顶部:3.5毫米音频插孔,扬声器,红外辐射器,麦克风
顶部:3.5毫米音频插孔,扬声器,红外辐射器,麦克风
底部。扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风
底部。扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风

微型SD卡读卡器

对于这个价格范围来说,microSD卡插槽的速度很快,在复制测试中,它在对比设备中排名相当靠前。小米设备在使用我们参考的Angelbird AV Pro V60存储卡进行连续读写时也表现良好。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Oppo A16s
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
45.73 MB/s +12%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
44 MB/s +8%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
40.85 MB/s
Nokia G20
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
12.5 MB/s -69%
Motorola Moto G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
12.3 MB/s -70%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.8 (26-44.9)
Motorola Moto G50 Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø34.9 (24.2-43.1)
Nokia G20 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø31.1 (21-41.1)
Oppo A16s PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37 (21.6-44.6)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø28.8 (15.3-45.8)
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø66.8 (7.33-79.4)
Motorola Moto G50 Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø79.1 (33.6-85.5)
Nokia G20 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø58.2 (14.6-62.3)
Oppo A16s PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø68.2 (16.6-76)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø70.7 (11.8-76.8)

软件 -Android 11和MIUI 12.5

小米红米10运行Android 11和小米的MIUI 12.5用户界面。在我们的审查期间,该智能手机收到了一个更新,使其Android 安全补丁达到了10月1日的水平,这是很及时的。

在我们的审查样本的64GB中,只有大约42GB的存储空间在重置设备后仍然可用,但根据使用类型,这可能是相当充足的。需要更多空间的人可以删除少数预装的第三方应用程序,如AliExpress和TikTok。应用程序数据不能存储在microSD卡上。

通信和GNSS - 快速的Wi-Fi,精确的GPS

小米红米10支持蓝牙5.1以及NFC,使其适用于移动支付。它通过12个LTE频率提供坚实的移动覆盖,但它不是一款适合环球旅行者的智能手机。然而,它支持与欧盟地区相关的大多数频率。

在WLAN方面,该智能手机通过Wi-Fi 5进行通信。与我们的Linksys Nighthawk AX12参考路由器相结合,它也实现了相应的传输速率,管理高达333 Mb/s。很好。在发送和接收数据时,数据传输都非常稳定。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
348 (340min - 353max) MBit/s +19%
Motorola Moto G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
312 (292min - 320max) MBit/s +6%
Oppo A16s
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash
294 (151min - 315max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
293 (284min - 301max) MBit/s
Nokia G20
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash
47 (24min - 73max) MBit/s -84%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s +13%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
361 (322min - 366max) MBit/s +8%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
333 (299min - 358max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G50
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
317 (256min - 332max) MBit/s -5%
Oppo A16s
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash
299 (200min - 346max) MBit/s -10%
Nokia G20
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G35, 64 GB eMMC Flash
46.9 (27min - 66max) MBit/s -86%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 10; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø332 (299-358)
Xiaomi Redmi 10; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø293 (284-301)
室内的GPS接收
室内的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收

GPS(L1)、GLONASS(L1)、Galileo(E1)和BeiDou(B1)是红米10用来确定其当前位置的卫星导航系统。在测试中,无论在室内还是室外,这都能非常迅速地工作,而且精确度可达一米。

即使在运动中,准确度仍然很高,使红米10在移动时成为非常好的导航设备。在近10公里长的测试路线上,小米智能手机追踪路线的准确性几乎与Garmin Edge 500专业导航设备一样。

GPS测试。摘要
GPS测试。摘要
GPS测试。湖泊
GPS测试。湖泊
GPS测试。转折点
GPS测试。转折点

电话和通话质量 - VoLTE和VoWiFi

红米10在通话质量方面的表现很稳定。声音听起来很自然,即使在免提模式下,它们在两个方向上都保持可理解。只要网络供应商支持,也可以通过VoLTE和VoWiFi进行通话。

摄像机 - 四个摄像机设置,5千万像素

用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片

小米红米10配备了四摄像头设置,占据了后盖的大量空间,使其看起来相当重要。不幸的是,现实却有些不同。四摄像头设置的核心是5000万像素的主摄像头(f/1.8),它通过像素比对将四个相邻的像素合并成一个,因此可以拍摄12.5万像素的照片。然而,你也可以在 "50M "模式下用全部5000万像素拍摄。

只要有足够的光线,主摄像头就能拍出相当清晰和详细的照片。然而,它们往往缺乏良好的动态效果,这往往使拍摄的颜色看起来很暗淡。该相机在变焦拍摄方面也没有做得特别好。在环境光线不足的情况下,使用夜间模式,你仍然可以从被摄体中获得一些细节,但整体的低光性能很弱。由于缺乏图像稳定功能,视频是相当颤抖的,而且与自拍相机一样,它们被限制在每秒30帧的1080p。

相机组合中最上层和最大的镜头是一个800万像素的广角相机(f/2.2)。它覆盖了120°的视野,一旦你将变焦系数设置为0.5倍,就会被激活。然而,如果正在录制视频,就不可能再在两个镜头之间切换。广角摄像头使用的白平衡与主摄像头略有不同,给我们留下的印象比主摄像头略好。它拍出的照片很扎实,不像其他一些智能手机镜头那样在画面边缘变形。

第三和第四个摄像头,即微距摄像头和深度传感器,是相当多余的。后者是因为它只用于制造模糊效果。而可以在照片选项中激活的微距相机,可以简单地放在一边,因为数码变焦产生的效果至少是一样好的。

用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用广角相机拍摄的照片
用广角相机拍摄的照片
用自拍相机拍摄的照片
用自拍相机拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight-Scene 1Daylight-Scene 2Ultra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photo

在受控的照明条件下,主摄像头当然能够准确地再现色彩,因此,通过软件优化,应该可以获得更好的照片质量。然而,低环境光(1勒克斯的较低色彩图)使相机和软件都受到了过度的限制。相机只能或多或少准确地捕捉到深灰色调。此外,在最佳照明条件下看起来很清晰的测试图,在这里只能朦胧地看到。

ColorChecker
5.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 10: 4.79 ∆E min: 1.4 - max: 7.51 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
54 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
53.4 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
41.7 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
63.4 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
76.3 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
89.8 ∆E
70.7 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 10: 46.42 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 89.8 ∆E

附件和保修 - 包括保护套

小米在红米10中包括一个22.5瓦的电源适配器,尽管该智能手机的最大充电功率只有18瓦。盒子里还包含一条USB-C电缆(Type-C转A),一个SIM卡工具,一个透明保护套,一份快速入门指南,以及一张保修卡。

小米红米10有12个月的保修期。

输入设备和处理 - 90赫兹的显示屏和快速指纹扫描仪

由于其90赫兹的刷新率,触摸屏可以流畅地使用。该面板还将自动适应所显示的内容。例如,当显示静态图像时,显示屏被设置为45赫兹,而60赫兹则用于视频流,全90赫兹则用于游戏或滚动。

红米10可以通过两种方式进行生物识别解锁。第一种是使用集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器,它可以快速而可靠地工作。第二种方法是不太安全的二维面部扫描,在良好的环境光线下能提供同样好的认证结果。

横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘

显示屏 - IPS面板,1080p分辨率

子像素网格
子像素网格

小米红米10的6.5英寸IPS显示屏的分辨率为2400x1080像素(全高清+),像素密度为405PPI。该显示屏不支持HDR,但它也不带有脉冲宽度调制(PWM),这是个好消息。由于IPS面板在没有PWM的帮助下控制其亮度,红米10也完全适合眼睛敏感的用户,否则他们会被这种效果所困扰。

IPS面板实现了平均518cd/m²的良好亮度。在均匀分布的明暗图像区域(APL50)而不是纯白背景的情况下,亮度最高可达535cd/m²。当亮度传感器未启用时,红米10的最高亮度为439 cd/m²。在最低的亮度设置下,我们测量到1.34 cd/m²。

506
cd/m²
540
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
508
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
513
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 542 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 518.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.34 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 542 cd/m²
Contrast: 2464:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
93.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Xiaomi Redmi 10
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Motorola Moto G50
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Nokia G20
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Oppo A16s
LCD, 1600x720, 6.52
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.60
Screen
-41%
-80%
-27%
-61%
Brightness middle
542
340
-37%
485
-11%
607
12%
415
-23%
Brightness
518
325
-37%
447
-14%
586
13%
378
-27%
Brightness Distribution
93
92
-1%
88
-5%
90
-3%
76
-18%
Black Level *
0.22
0.18
18%
0.44
-100%
0.52
-136%
0.26
-18%
Contrast
2464
1889
-23%
1102
-55%
1167
-53%
1596
-35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3
4.75
-58%
5.75
-92%
3.1
-3%
5.41
-80%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.7
7.53
-12%
10.53
-57%
6.7
-0%
9.77
-46%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
3.9
-179%
5.7
-307%
2
-43%
4.8
-243%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.224 99%
2.095 105%
2.17 101%
2.348 94%
CCT
6450 101%
7384 88%
8070 81%
6806 96%
7748 84%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

红米10的色彩再现可以使用三种模式进行调整。"鲜艳"、"饱和 "和 "标准"。此外,色温可以使用色轮或 "标准"、"暖色 "和 "冷色 "三种预设来调整。

我们使用 "鲜艳 "和 "温暖 "设置获得最准确的色彩再现。在这种情况下,颜色和灰度的DeltaE偏差都在理想的范围内(DeltaE≤3),就像6450K的色温一样。由于其低黑度,IPS面板也以丰富的对比度对待观众。

色彩准确性(鲜艳的色彩方案、暖色温、sRGB目标色彩空间
色彩准确性(鲜艳的色彩方案、暖色温、sRGB目标色彩空间
色彩空间(鲜艳的色彩方案、暖色温、sRGB目标色彩空间
色彩空间(鲜艳的色彩方案、暖色温、sRGB目标色彩空间
灰度(鲜艳的色彩方案,温暖的色温,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
灰度(鲜艳的色彩方案,温暖的色温,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩饱和度(鲜艳的色彩方案,温暖的色温,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩饱和度(鲜艳的色彩方案,温暖的色温,sRGB目标色彩空间)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.8 ms rise
↘ 19.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

由于小米手机提供了相当多的亮度,它实际上应该很容易在户外使用。然而,IPS面板的视角稳定性不是很好,给户外使用带来了一些挑战。智能手机应该尽可能地垂直于观看方向,因为即使将屏幕倾斜45°也足以使显示屏明显变暗。然而,在更平坦的观察角度下,面板不会进一步变暗。

室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。
视角
视角

性能--联发科Helio G88的日常性能很稳定

小米红米10采用的是中端,联发科Helio G88SoC。这个八核CPU以12纳米的尺寸制造,它使用两个快速的ARM Cortex-A75性能核心,运行速度高达2GHz。同时还有六个ARM Cortex-A55省电内核(最高1.8GHz)。ARM Mali-G52作为GPU。

联发科SoC由4GB的LPDDR4x内存支持,这使得它的日常性能基本平稳。然而,在多任务处理过程中,原本流畅的MIUI动画偶尔会出现轻微的延迟。

我们的审查显示,红米10是拥有联发科Helio G88的较快预算智能手机之一。没有办法击败摩托罗拉Moto G50,其骁龙480 5G ,但诺基亚G20Oppo A16s ,它们都配备了联发科Helio G35,显然被小米手机打败了。

红米10在合成基准测试中的速度与它的前辈红米9 一样,甚至有时在浏览器基准测试中得分略高。然而,在浏览速度方面,这并不明显。网站加载迅速,可以快速滚动浏览。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
365 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
507 Points +39%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
170 Points -53%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
176 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
564 Points +55%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
363 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (284 - 378, n=5)
356 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)
913 Points +150%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1265 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1627 Points +29%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
607 Points -52%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
965 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1712 Points +35%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1281 Points +1%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1132 - 1450, n=5)
1284 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)
2996 Points +137%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1267 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
999 Points -21%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1376 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1109 Points -12%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  ()
1267 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 9992, n=85, last 2 years)
4251 Points +236%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1223 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1048 Points -14%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1392 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1124 Points -8%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  ()
1223 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (434 - 10711, n=77, last 2 years)
4053 Points +231%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8842 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
8351 Points -6%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5297 Points -40%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5272 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
7434 Points -16%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (6789 - 9356, n=5)
8557 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=214, last 2 years)
11787 Points +33%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1817 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3596 Points +98%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
574 Points -68%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
850 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3357 Points +85%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  ()
1817 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)
3766 Points +107%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1709 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3767 Points +120%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
517 Points -70%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
774 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3442 Points +101%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  ()
1709 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)
4186 Points +145%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2336 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3103 Points +33%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
937 Points -60%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1291 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3090 Points +32%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  ()
2336 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)
3082 Points +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1833 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3647 Points +99%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
599 Points -67%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
928 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3565 Points +94%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  ()
1833 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)
9351 Points +410%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1713 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3839 Points +124%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
541 Points -68%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
853 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3619 Points +111%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  ()
1713 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)
16352 Points +855%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2426 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3103 Points +28%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
954 Points -61%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1343 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3389 Points +40%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  ()
2426 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)
4426 Points +82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1394 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2478 Points +78%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
341 Points -76%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
486 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2360 Points +69%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1362 - 1407, n=5)
1390 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=105, last 2 years)
2755 Points +98%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1250 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2338 Points +87%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
289 Points -77%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
412 Points -67%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2217 Points +77%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1213 - 1255, n=5)
1238 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=105, last 2 years)
2751 Points +120%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2339 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3136 Points +34%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
933 Points -60%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1301 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3047 Points +30%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (2339 - 2625, n=5)
2441 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=105, last 2 years)
3163 Points +35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1416 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2563 Points +81%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
373 Points -74%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
539 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2463 Points +74%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1334 - 1453, n=5)
1399 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=182, last 2 years)
6737 Points +376%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1265 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2447 Points +93%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
318 Points -75%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
462 Points -63%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2290 Points +81%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1177 - 1277, n=5)
1235 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=181, last 2 years)
9723 Points +669%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2427 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3076 Points +27%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
949 Points -61%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1304 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3350 Points +38%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (2427 - 2847, n=5)
2614 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=181, last 2 years)
4224 Points +74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1396 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2284 Points +64%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
426 Points -69%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2244 Points +61%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1388 - 1472, n=4)
1420 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6439, n=99, last 2 years)
2671 Points +91%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1264 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2195 Points +74%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
349 Points -72%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2141 Points +69%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1260 - 1322, n=4)
1278 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=99, last 2 years)
2850 Points +125%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2203 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2664 Points +21%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1829 Points -17%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2698 Points +22%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (2150 - 2545, n=4)
2336 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 3525, n=99, last 2 years)
2675 Points +21%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
712 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
986 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1094 Points +54%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (697 - 759, n=5)
729 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 9839, n=135, last 2 years)
2555 Points +259%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
721 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
974 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1074 Points +49%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (622 - 755, n=5)
719 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=203, last 2 years)
6280 Points +771%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
182 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
290 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
100 Points -45%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (182 - 191, n=5)
188 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 5226, n=207, last 2 years)
1689 Points +828%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
181 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
284 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1073 Points +493%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (156 - 189, n=5)
180.2 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=202, last 2 years)
1698 Points +838%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
42 fps
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
84 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
52 fps +24%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (34 - 42, n=4)
39.3 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)
84.6 fps +101%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
46 fps
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
81 fps +76%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
61 fps +33%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (38 - 46, n=4)
44 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)
247 fps +437%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
18 fps
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
66 fps +267%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
33 fps +83%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (18 - 24, n=4)
21 fps +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)
72.2 fps +301%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
25 fps
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
41 fps +64%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
37 fps +48%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (21 - 26, n=4)
24.5 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)
140.6 fps +462%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13 fps
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
53 fps +308%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
21 fps +62%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (13 - 14, n=4)
13.5 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)
60.9 fps +368%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
16 fps
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
29 fps +81%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
24 fps +50%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (13 - 16, n=4)
15.3 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)
99 fps +519%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.1 fps
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
28 fps +208%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
11 fps +21%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (7.4 - 9.1, n=4)
8.28 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)
43.4 fps +377%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.6 fps
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
16 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
14 fps +46%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (8.7 - 10, n=4)
9.58 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)
59.9 fps +524%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9 fps
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
30 fps +233%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.6 fps -16%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.8 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
13 fps +44%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (7.5 - 9, n=5)
8.24 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=226, last 2 years)
44 fps +389%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.7 fps
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
17 fps +75%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.2 fps -57%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.2 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
15 fps +55%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (8.2 - 9.7, n=5)
9.28 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=226, last 2 years)
64.3 fps +563%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5.9 fps
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
19 fps +222%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.8 fps -19%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps +37%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (4.7 - 5.9, n=5)
5.14 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 119, n=226, last 2 years)
32.8 fps +456%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.5 fps
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6.4 fps +83%
Nokia G20
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.5 fps -57%
Oppo A16s
Mediatek Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.5 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.5 fps +57%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (3.2 - 3.5, n=5)
3.42 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=226, last 2 years)
25.6 fps +631%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
286457 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
287506 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (259233 - 272388, n=2)
265811 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
185120 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
257336 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
249843 Points +35%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  ()
185120 Points 0%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1238 Score
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1330 Score +7%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  ()
1238 Score 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2523 - 10071, n=12, last 2 years)
5985 Score +383%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7120 Points
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4787 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8794 Points +24%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  ()
7120 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)
21146 Points +197%
Basemark GPU 1.2
1280x720 OpenGL Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
108 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  ()
108 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (195.7 - 549, n=12, last 2 years)
327 fps +203%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
19.03 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
18.65 (11.54min - 33.09max) fps -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (18.3 - 19, n=2)
18.6 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.65 - 13860, n=54, last 2 years)
329 fps +1629%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
16.73 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
16.41 (6.03min - 29.32max) fps -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (16.2 - 16.7, n=2)
16.5 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.3 - 9309, n=53, last 2 years)
239 fps +1329%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
104.8 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
fps -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (93.3 - 104.8, n=2)
99.1 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.12 - 39496, n=56, last 2 years)
1344 fps +1182%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
17.7 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
17.43 (2.78min - 35.71max) fps -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (17.3 - 17.7, n=2)
17.5 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.51 - 15712, n=55, last 2 years)
406 fps +2194%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
15.7 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
15.76 (2.9min - 30.53max) fps 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (15.2 - 15.7, n=2)
15.4 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 14706, n=54, last 2 years)
339 fps +2059%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2247 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3005 Points +34%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2273 Points +1%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (2247 - 2396, n=3)
2325 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +156%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4065 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6486 Points +60%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
4865 Points +20%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (4065 - 4695, n=3)
4408 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points +138%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3204 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4473 Points +40%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2654 Points -17%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (2858 - 3358, n=3)
3140 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +96%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1878 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2398 Points +28%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1759 Points -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1878 - 1960, n=3)
1931 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +657%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1042 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1172 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1243 Points +19%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1042 - 1125, n=3)
1096 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points +43%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points +271%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
46.02 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
38.21 Points +34%
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (28.1 - 35.9, n=3)
30.9 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 (Chrome 85)
30.52 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
28.58 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points +108%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
78.6 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
78.4 Points +56%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 (Chrome 85)
54 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
50.2 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88 ()
50.2 Points 0%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min +339%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chome 91)
38.4 runs/min +57%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chome 92)
37.2 runs/min +52%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 (Chrome 85)
28.1 runs/min +15%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
24.4 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (20.6 - 27.5, n=3)
24.2 runs/min -1%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points +177%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
72 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
58 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
48 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (43 - 53, n=3)
48 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 9
45 Points -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)
33503 Points +215%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
16870 Points +59%
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
15861 Points +49%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
10625 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 9 (Chrome 85)
10432 Points -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (7611 - 10625, n=5)
9306 Points -12%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (3706 - 5573, n=3)
4567 ms * -23%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 (Chrome 85)
4076 ms * -10%
Xiaomi Redmi 10 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
3706 ms *
Motorola Moto G50 (Chrome 91)
2694 ms * +27%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
2543 ms * +31%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * +57%

* ... smaller is better

红米10在其智能手机级别中使用了一种非常快的eMMC存储,这使得它在对比设备中拥有迄今为止最短的加载时间。它只被摩托罗拉Moto G50

Xiaomi Redmi 10Motorola Moto G50Nokia G20Oppo A16sSamsung Galaxy A22 5GXiaomi Redmi 9Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
16%
-38%
-33%
0%
-33%
-31%
307%
Sequential Read 256KB
321.3
392
22%
256.1
-20%
289.2
-10%
300.5
-6%
289.9
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB
178
204.4
15%
139.3
-22%
168.4
-5%
210.3
18%
119.8
-33%
176.8 ?(40 - 274, n=201)
-1%
Random Read 4KB
100.7
89.2
-11%
63.5
-37%
45.32
-55%
118
17%
49.09
-51%
Random Write 4KB
95.8
131.7
37%
27.4
-71%
35.23
-63%
69.2
-28%
60.7
-37%

游戏--90赫兹的显示屏并没有提供任何优势

小米红米10运行游戏相当流畅,并伴随着立体声,但它很难利用其90赫兹显示屏的优势。只有在图形非常简单的游戏中,如《地铁冲浪》,才可能达到每秒60帧。在这里,帧率仍然有短暂的下降,这一事实表明,硬件或多或少已经工作在极限状态。在像《PUBG Mobile》这样图形要求高的游戏中,FPS的极限甚至要低得多。红米10仍然能够以几乎恒定的30FPS显示流行的射击游戏,即使是在高清/高设置下。

我们用Gamebench工具确定帧率。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
地铁冲浪者
地铁冲浪者
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 10; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø29.9 (28-31)
Xiaomi Redmi 10; PUBG Mobile; 1.6.0: Ø29.7 (26-31)
Xiaomi Redmi 10; Subway Surfers; 2.24.2: Ø59.5 (47-61)

排放 - 作为王牌的立体声扬声器

温度

红米10产生的废热比其前辈红米9 。在使用过程中,它的温度最高只有35.8°C(约96°F)(红米9:44.8°C(约112°F));因此,它最多只有触感发热。

即使在连续的负载下,该智能手机也几乎不需要控制其性能。我们只在GFXBench的压力测试中观察到稍高程度的节流现象。

GFXBench T-Rex电池测试
GFXBench T-Rex电池测试
GFXBench曼哈顿电池测试
GFXBench曼哈顿电池测试
Max. Load
 35.1 °C34.7 °C35.8 °C 
 34.1 °C34.1 °C35.4 °C 
 33.9 °C33.2 °C33.1 °C 
Maximum: 35.8 °C
Average: 34.4 °C
32.1 °C35 °C33.9 °C
31.4 °C33.6 °C35.8 °C
31.2 °C31.8 °C34.3 °C
Maximum: 35.8 °C
Average: 33.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.2 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99 (1098min) % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.2 (4.26min) %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi 10
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.9 (1.09min) %
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 (316min) % 0%
00.20.40.70.91.11.31.51.722.22.42.62.833.33.53.73.94.1Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 10; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø1.096 (1.09-1.102)
Xiaomi Redmi 10; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.32 (4.26-4.34)

发言人

红米10的立体声扬声器是它的一张小王牌,因为在低预算的智能手机中,从两边产生声音是比较例外的,而不是常规。例如,摩托罗拉Moto G50三星Galaxy A22 5G只具有单声道声音。然而,红米10的两个扬声器并不特别强大,这是由于几乎不存在低音。

外部音频设备可以通过蓝牙5.1和一个3.5毫米音频插孔连接。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203739.32525.629.83129.124.64023.423.95036.833.16328.425.78024.823.610022.426.812519.227.116016.940.920015.641.725013.847.631513.456.340013.362.950013.867.46301273.180012.773.1100012.274.112501374.8160013.776200013.278.1250013.480.631501381.7400013.377.8500013.676630013.374.1800013.872.51000013.769.6125001463.81600013.556.9SPL25.588.9N0.773.6median 13.5median 73.1Delta0.79.845.643.140.24033.43231.237.53540.727.524.720.119.819.619.317.222.615.931.912.438.71245.910.249.610.154.18.760.615.266.616.368.415.673.913.174.611.174.111.57411.772.914.171.114.465.617.763.616.567.716.769.718.174.117.573.218.854.927.183.50.854.2median 15.2median 66.62.712.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 10Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 以18瓦的速度快速充电

能源消耗

小米在红米10中包括一个22.5瓦的电源适配器,尽管智能手机的最大充电功率只有18瓦。在测试中,当电池完全耗尽时,需要2:39小时才能完全充电。

总的来说,红米10的功耗并没有显示出任何问题。然而,这款智能手机在空闲使用和负载情况下的能耗并不太节俭。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.15 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.53 / 2.01 / 2.02 Watt
Load midlight 4.11 / 5.76 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi 10
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G50
5000 mAh
Oppo A16s
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G88
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-2%
19%
-2%
-8%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
0.53
0.9
-70%
0.44
17%
0.9
-70%
0.765 ?(0.53 - 1, n=2)
-44%
Idle Average *
2.01
1.5
25%
1.67
17%
1.3
35%
1.605 ?(1.2 - 2.01, n=2)
20%
Idle Maximum *
2.02
1.9
6%
1.68
17%
1.7
16%
1.76 ?(1.5 - 2.02, n=2)
13%
Load Average *
4.11
3.5
15%
2.91
29%
3.8
8%
4.16 ?(4.11 - 4.2, n=2)
-1%
Load Maximum *
5.76
4.9
15%
4.95
14%
5.8
-1%
7.33 ?(5.76 - 8.9, n=2)
-27%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mediatek Helio G88: Ø3.38 (1.056-7.25)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700: Ø6.04 (3.61-8.93)

Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.60.811.21.41.61.822.22.42.52.72.93.13.33.53.7Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mediatek Helio G88; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.4 (2.96-3.92)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.06 (2.9-3.43)
Xiaomi Redmi 10 Mediatek Helio G88; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.3 (1.064-2.04)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.284 (1.25-1.55)

电池寿命

由于其略高于平均水平的功耗,红米10实现了良好的电池运行时间,但不是很大。这款智能手机在模拟网络浏览时的运行时间刚刚超过14小时,在视频复制时的运行时间几乎为17小时。

因此,小米手机无法超越竞争对手,如摩托罗拉Moto G50三星Galaxy A22 5G 。这两款手机的电池标称容量相同,但它们大大超过了红米10的坚实的电池寿命。例如,它们都能进行超过19小时的网络浏览,而Moto G50甚至接近20小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
39h 16min
WiFi Websurfing
14h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 41min
Xiaomi Redmi 10
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G50
5000 mAh
Nokia G20
5050 mAh
Oppo A16s
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
24%
38%
23%
20%
Reader / Idle
2356
3026
28%
2853
21%
H.264
1002
1302
30%
1307
30%
WiFi v1.3
858
1198
40%
1186
38%
1053
23%
1156
35%
Load
341
326
-4%
316
-7%

Pros

+ 90赫兹显示
+ 高质量的做工
+ NFC
+ 良好的指纹传感器
+ 扎实的SoC性能
+ 快速的Wi-Fi 5
+ 双卡和microSD
+ 立体声扬声器

Cons

- 视角稳定性低
- 电池寿命只有平均水平
- 平庸的5000万像素摄像头
- 没有4K视频记录

对小米红米10的评判

在审查中。小米红米10。测试设备由小米德国公司提供。
在审查中。小米红米10。测试设备由小米德国公司提供。

小米红米10是一款不错的经济型智能手机,由于其高质量的做工,在外观上可以与更昂贵的设备竞争。虽然这款6.5英寸的设备售价不到200欧元(约231美元),但其性能也不错。红米10的90赫兹显示屏令人愉悦地流畅,八核联发科Helio G88

SoC为日常任务提供了足够的性能。即使是现代游戏,通常也是可以玩的,没有任何重大的妥协。

红米10的全面连接功能也是它的优势之一;它们包括NFC、蓝牙5.1、真正的双SIM卡功能、3.5毫米音频插孔和红外辐射器。这款智能手机不支持5G,但它提供快速和稳定的Wi-Fi 5作为回报。一个可靠的指纹传感器和良好的立体声扬声器,在预算领域仍然是例外,也是包装的一部分。

有了小米红米10,有预算意识的买家得到了一个视觉上吸引人的智能手机,也为日常使用提供了良好的装备。

预算价格使得在这里和那里偷工减料是不可避免的。就红米10而言,IPS显示屏受到了影响。它的亮度超过500cd/m²,比平均水平要高,但其适度的视角稳定性使其难以在户外使用。5000万像素的四摄像头设置在纸面上比在实践中更令人印象深刻,而且它不是为摄影爱好者准备的。然而,那些只是偶尔拍快照的用户会对该相机感到满意。

小米红米10的一个很好的替代品是摩托罗拉Moto G50 ,例如--相同的外形尺寸,更快的SoC,稍低的显示分辨率,但换来的却是更便宜的价格。4G版的,三星Galaxy A22 ,速度也更快,价格与红米10差不多,此外还配备了AMOLED显示屏。

价格和可用性

在写这篇文章的时候,如果你在美国,要买到小米红米10相当困难。你可以在ebay上找到64GB的版本售价约为239美元。另外,你也可以等待它在其他商店上市,比如AmazonNewegg.

Xiaomi Redmi 10 - 11/03/2021 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
50 / 70 → 71%
Weight
90%
Battery
90%
Display
88%
Games Performance
16 / 64 → 25%
Application Performance
63 / 86 → 73%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
81 / 90 → 90%
Camera
57%
Average
74%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米红米10智能手机评论。具有NFC和90赫兹的良好预算手机
Manuel Masiero, 2021-11- 9 (Update: 2021-11- 9)