联想 Smart Paper 评测--稳定金属外壳中的电子墨水平板电脑

Name: Lenovo Smart Paper
Brand: Lenovo

书虫 Smart Paper 是联想公司生产的一款高品质电子墨水平板电脑，你可以用它来轻松记笔记，帮助你学习文件而不会感到疲倦。虽然该设备基于Android ，但你几乎无法在上面运行任何应用程序。在这篇评测中，我们将了解这款平板电脑能做什么，不能做什么。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/18/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Tablet Android

电子墨水屏幕是当下的流行趋势，毕竟与传统的手机或平板电脑显示屏相比，电子墨水屏幕在阅读时对眼睛造成的负担要小得多。它们还可以在户外使用，非常适合做笔记。

联想 Smart Paper 就采用了这种显示屏，此外，它的笔输入、免费配件和出色的外壳都令人印象深刻。归根结底，这款平板电脑到底能帮你完成多少工作取决于软件，以及你是否能在上面安装任何应用程序。

因此，让我们来看看联想 Smart Paper 在我们的测试和日常使用中表现如何。

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Smart Paper

Processor

Rockchip RK3566 4 x - 2 GHz, ARM Cortex-A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G52 MP2

Memory

4 GB

Display

10.30 inch 4:3, 1872 x 1404 pixel 227 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, E-Ink, glossy: no

Storage

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 58 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: hall, gyroscope

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 5.5 x 226 x 195

Battery

3500 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Android 11

Additional features

charger, USB cable, pen, folio, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

408 g

Price

499 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
75.2 %	08/2023	Lenovo Smart Paper RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2	408 g	5.5 mm	10.30"	1872x1404
79.4 %	08/2022	Huawei MatePad Paper Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6	360 g	6.65 mm	10.30"	1872x1404
88.8 %	08/2023	Xiaomi Pad 6 SD 870, Adreno 650	490 g	6.51 mm	11.00"	2880x1800
80 %	03/2023	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 T610, Mali-G52 MP2	460 g	8.5 mm	10.10"	1920x1200

外壳 - 美观的铝质

如果你已经拿过联想的平板电脑，那么你一定会对这款智能纸感到熟悉：它的铝制外壳和双色背面（通过不同的纹理实现）以及侧面的品牌名称在其他联想平板电脑上也能找到。让银色材料熠熠生辉的倒角和几乎无法弯曲的外壳都让人感受到这款设备的高品质。

与华为 MatePad Paper相比，我们的测试设备稍大一些，但也更轻薄。此外，Smart Paper 比华为的电子墨水平板电脑重约 50 克，而华为的电子墨水平板电脑只有一个简单的塑料外壳。

屏幕周围的边框很厚，但这在平板电脑上是合理的，因为你不希望总是不小心启动触摸屏。边框的一侧实际上更宽--这一侧可以收纳触控笔，还可以让你单手握住平板电脑，就像拿着一本书一样。

尺寸比较

功能 - 相当稀少

从联想 Smart Paper 微薄的功能上就能看出它不是普通的平板电脑：没有 microSD 读卡器，没有耳机插孔，没有摄像头，没有扬声器，也没有定位系统。

4 GB 内存和 64 GB eMMC 闪存，对于 400 美元的价格来说，它的内存不算最大。不过，你几乎无法在平板电脑黑白且反应缓慢的电子墨水显示屏上加载任何图像和视频，所以你可能并不需要太多的存储空间。

它的 USB-C 端口可用于为平板电脑充电，以及与电脑之间的数据传输。您还可以使用联想的 Companion 应用程序进行无线传输。

软件 - 基于Android 11

联想安装的操作系统基于Android 11 AOSP，即Android 的开源部分。其表面保持了简洁，与屏幕的有限功能相一致。

Android 虽然不能正式安装应用程序，但你仍然可以通过 apk 文件进行安装，不过我们在测试中遇到了一些启动困难。这意味着你可以安装自己喜欢的电子书商店应用--但这款平板电脑只预装了 ebooks.com，而且只有下载英文书籍的选项。

此外，联想还在平板电脑上预装了日历、计算器、笔记应用程序和电子邮件应用程序。Paper Smart 还可以显示原生 Epub 格式的电子书，当然也可以显示 txt 和 pdf 文件。

你不能指望在任何时候看到全新版本的Android ，但根据联想的说法，这款平板电脑从发布之日起（2023 年中期）至少两年内都会收到安全补丁更新。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 5，接收良好

联想的智能纸采用了最快的 WiFi 5 标准。不过，MLAN 模块并不能真正利用这一高速标准的优势--其传输速率仅为 211 - 286 MBit/s，大大低于我们的预期。

在实际使用中，即使你离路由器很近，网站加载也需要相当长的时间。图片的加载时间更长。在距离路由器 10 米、中间有 3 面墙的情况下，您只能接收到 3/4 的信号--网站在平板电脑屏幕上显示几乎不需要任何时间。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	932 (727^min - 966^max) MBit/s +342%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	928 (812^min - 949^max) MBit/s +340%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	319 (310^min - 325^max) MBit/s +51%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	211 (186^min - 246^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	945 (826^min - 958^max) MBit/s +230%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	880 (791^min - 925^max) MBit/s +208%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	351 (333^min - 366^max) MBit/s +23%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	286 (236^min - 308^max) MBit/s

Lenovo Smart Paper; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø211 (186-246)

Lenovo Smart Paper; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø286 (236-308)

附件和保修 - 包括很多

除了设备本身，联想还包括一个充电器、USB 线、输入笔以及一个配套的对开包，对开包上有一个存放输入笔的空间。

制造商为该产品在美国提供 12 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 精确的输入笔

触摸屏大部分时间都能准确识别我们的输入，但反应稍有延迟，原因是显示屏帧率较低，与 LED 或 OLED 屏幕相比，图像生成速度较慢。平板电脑有限的性能也是一个问题--网站加载缓慢偶尔会导致搜索栏的输入延迟，或者因为无法处理输入而吞没字母。

另一方面，在使用无源手写笔时，这款平板电脑无疑会大放异彩。它无需通过蓝牙连接，有 4,096 级压力，重量只有 15 克。虽然在绘图或书写时会有极小的延迟，但可以忽略不计。联想称延迟时间为 25 毫秒。在联想的智能纸（Smart Paper）上，它的众多压力级别无法使用得那么精细，但效果仍然不错。

平板电脑的哑光和略微粗糙的表面几乎与纸张无异，在上面书写非常舒适。

在安全性方面，这款平板电脑没有指纹传感器或面部扫描仪：只能通过设置 PIN 码来保护平板电脑，防止未经授权的访问。

显示屏 - 对比度高，但不适合观看视频

联想的 Smart Paper 采用 10.3 英寸显示屏，分辨率为 1,872 x 1,404 像素，与华为的 MatePad Paper 规格完全相同。

电子墨水显示屏的技术非常特殊：在这里，每个像素中都混合了带不同电荷的黑白墨水颗粒，因此可以显示 16 种不同的灰色、全黑或白色。由于在单色背景前显示的是真正的彩色颗粒，因此不一定需要良好的光线就能读取显示内容。得益于其高对比度和哑光表面，即使是环境光也足以做到这一点。

不过，它还配备了 LED 背光，可以在夜间进行阅读，因此不必像其他平板电脑那样大功率：屏幕亮度可达 116 cd/m²。


111 cd/m²	113 cd/m²	106 cd/m²
103 cd/m²	113 cd/m²	97 cd/m²
102 cd/m²	116 cd/m²	96 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 116 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 106.3 cd/m² Minimum: 11.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 113 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Greyscale 9.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 1.371

	Lenovo Smart Paper E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.30	Huawei MatePad Paper E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.30	Xiaomi Pad 6 IPS LCD, 2880x1800, 11.00	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10
Screen		-21%	210%	113%
Brightness middle	113	61.9 -45%	541 379%	343 204%
Brightness	106	60 -43%	494 366%	332 213%
Brightness Distribution	83	80 -4%	89 7%	94 13%
Black Level *			0.65	0.31
Greyscale dE 2000 *	9.9	9.1 8%	1.4 86%	7.9 20%
Gamma	1.371 ^160%	2.02 ^109%	2.26 ^97%	2.184 ^101%
CCT	7116 ^91%	6848 ^95%	6710 ^97%	9198 ^71%
Contrast			832	1106
Colorchecker dE 2000 *			0.9	5.9
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *			1.8	11.2

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17898 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在我们使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测量中，由于灰度级数有限，不足以正确呈现每种亮度的细微差别，因此部分偏差相当大。不过，由于背光提供了冷白平衡，其白色再现效果相当不错。

电子墨水显示屏不存在 PWM，而且一旦图像建立起来，无论如何都要经过较长的时间才能刷新。这意味着你只能在非常有限的范围内欣赏视频或游戏，而且在输入时还会出现延迟。

有时还会出现鬼影，必须手动刷新屏幕才能消除。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.4 ms rise
27.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.1 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
134.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 56.2 ms rise
134.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 68.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在室外，由于采用了磨砂涂层，显示屏在没有任何背光的情况下也能正常工作，即使在明亮的日子里也能清晰阅读。只有当阳光直接照射在显示屏上时，才会出现反光，遮住屏幕内容。

可视角度非常完美，从任何方向都能以完全相同的质量阅读屏幕内容。

性能 - 我们期望看到更多

磐芯 RK3566RK3566对我们来说，这是一款相当不寻常的 SoC，因为它的性能太弱，甚至不能用于非常廉价的平板电脑或智能手机。它只有 4 个 Cortex A55 内核，对于记笔记或阅读文档等简单任务来说，其性能是足够的，但一旦要求更高，就会出现严重的延迟--如果应用程序根本无法启动的话。

在基准测试中，你可以看到其他平板电脑以及华为的 MatePad Paper能提供更强的动力：我们的测试设备总是远远落在后面，排在最后。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 6	1003 Points +601%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=69, last 2 years)	659 Points +361%
Huawei MatePad Paper	566 Points +296%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	346 Points +142%
Lenovo Smart Paper	143 Points
Average Rockchip RK3566 ()	143 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Pad 6	3328 Points +967%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=69, last 2 years)	2345 Points +652%
Huawei MatePad Paper	1853 Points +494%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1267 Points +306%
Lenovo Smart Paper	312 Points
Average Rockchip RK3566 ()	312 Points 0%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 6	581322 Points +449%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=53, last 2 years)	449757 Points +325%
Huawei MatePad Paper	287379 Points +172%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	199786 Points +89%
Lenovo Smart Paper	105826 Points
Average Rockchip RK3566 ()	105826 Points 0%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Pad 6	13728 Points +239%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=66, last 2 years)	8715 Points +115%
Lenovo Smart Paper	4045 Points
Average Rockchip RK3566 ()	4045 Points 0%

CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 6	754 Points +338%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1585, n=52, last 2 years)	666 Points +287%
Huawei MatePad Paper	552 Points +221%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	356 Points +107%
Lenovo Smart Paper	172 Points
Average Rockchip RK3566 ()	172 Points 0%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 6	5289 Points +906%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=52, last 2 years)	3631 Points +590%
Huawei MatePad Paper	3598 Points +584%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	2283 Points +334%
Lenovo Smart Paper	526 Points
Average Rockchip RK3566 ()	526 Points 0%
System
Xiaomi Pad 6	8463 Points +667%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=52, last 2 years)	6543 Points +493%
Huawei MatePad Paper	5987 Points +443%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	4777 Points +333%
Lenovo Smart Paper	1103 Points
Average Rockchip RK3566 ()	1103 Points 0%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 6	6127 Points +569%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=52, last 2 years)	4284 Points +368%
Huawei MatePad Paper	3930 Points +329%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	3412 Points +272%
Lenovo Smart Paper	916 Points
Average Rockchip RK3566 ()	916 Points 0%
Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 6	11263 Points +1434%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=52, last 2 years)	6639 Points +804%
Huawei MatePad Paper	5893 Points +703%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1497 Points +104%
Lenovo Smart Paper	734 Points
Average Rockchip RK3566 ()	734 Points 0%
Web
Xiaomi Pad 6	1336 Points +1197%
Huawei MatePad Paper	1209 Points +1074%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=52, last 2 years)	1205 Points +1070%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1114 Points +982%
Lenovo Smart Paper	103 Points
Average Rockchip RK3566 ()	103 Points 0%

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 6	1299 Points +540%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 2107, n=45, last 2 years)	802 Points +295%
Lenovo Smart Paper	203 Points
Average Rockchip RK3566 ()	203 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Pad 6	3357 Points +581%
Average of class Tablet (493 - 5652, n=45, last 2 years)	2265 Points +359%
Lenovo Smart Paper	493 Points
Average Rockchip RK3566 ()	493 Points 0%

Legend

Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, ARM Mali-G57 MP6, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Average Rockchip RK3566

Average of class Tablet

在图形计算方面，你也不应该对 SoC 抱有太高的期望：在基准测试中，它只能排在最后一位，性能往往只有华为 MatePad Paper的 10-20%。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1233 Points +1613%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	609 Points +746%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	132 Points +83%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	72 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1246 Points +1561%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	625 Points +733%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	135 Points +80%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	75 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4252 Points +1371%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1886 Points +553%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	522 Points +81%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	289 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4293 Points +1401%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1925 Points +573%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	524 Points +83%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	286 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7363 Points +1135%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4281 Points +618%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1146 Points +92%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	596 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8593 Points +1521%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4472 Points +744%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	979 Points +85%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	530 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4882 Points +360%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3725 Points +251%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2848 Points +168%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1061 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +679%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31 fps +121%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps +43%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	181 fps +906%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	103 fps +472%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	32 fps +78%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	18 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +628%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps +147%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	19 fps +135%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.1 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps +973%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps +473%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	20 fps +82%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps +588%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps +317%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps +129%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4.8 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +1166%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	44 fps +588%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps +88%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.4 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps +577%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps +448%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.4 fps +106%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3.1 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps +1189%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps +453%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.6 fps +74%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3.8 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17 fps +795%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps +584%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4.5 fps +137%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.9 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps +1329%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	10 fps +614%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2.7 fps +93%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.4 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps +633%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +533%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.4 fps +147%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps +1259%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps +644%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.8 fps +100%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3.9 fps

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.7 fps +1517%
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4.8 fps +700%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.2 fps +100%
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash	0.6 fps

虽然可以使用联想的 Smart Paper 上网冲浪，但它并不十分有趣：一方面，网页加载速度相当慢，另一方面，复杂的动画或广告横幅经常会妨碍操作的流畅性。例如，在顺利使用搜索字段之前，往往需要等待很长时间。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	86.985 Points +338%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=60, last 2 years)	84.4 Points +325%
Huawei MatePad Paper (Huawei Browser 12)	56.217 Points +183%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	46.85 Points +136%
Average Rockchip RK3566 ()	19.9 Points 0%
Lenovo Smart Paper (Firefox 116)	19.86 Points

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	94 Points +348%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 227, n=58, last 2 years)	85.1 Points +305%
Huawei MatePad Paper (Huawei Browser 12)	64 Points +205%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	53 Points +152%
Lenovo Smart Paper (Firefox 116)	21 Points
Average Rockchip RK3566 ()	21 Points 0%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 6 (chrome 115)	134 Points +272%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=42, last 2 years)	120.7 Points +235%
Huawei MatePad Paper (Huawei Browser 12)	86 Points +139%
Lenovo Smart Paper (Firefox 116)	36 Points
Average Rockchip RK3566 ()	36 Points 0%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=53, last 2 years)	76.7 runs/min +387%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	68.93 runs/min +338%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chome 111)	34.43 runs/min +119%
Huawei MatePad Paper (Huawei Browser 12)	34.1 runs/min +117%
Average Rockchip RK3566 ()	15.8 runs/min 0%
Lenovo Smart Paper (Firefox 116)	15.75 runs/min

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	30783 Points +513%
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=73, last 2 years)	22894 Points +356%
Huawei MatePad Paper (Huawei Browser 12)	18755 Points +273%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	11952 Points +138%
Lenovo Smart Paper (Firefox 116)	5022 Points
Average Rockchip RK3566 ()	5022 Points 0%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo Smart Paper (Firefox 116)	34733.4 ms *
Average Rockchip RK3566 ()	34733 ms * -0%
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=60, last 2 years)	3205 ms * +91%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	3075.1 ms * +91%
Huawei MatePad Paper (Huawei Browser 12)	2174.3 ms * +94%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	1532.1 ms * +96%

* ... smaller is better

联想智能纸的 eMMC 闪存也不尽如人意：它的运行速度非常慢，而存储控制器的运行速度则更慢。华为 MatePad Paper采用 UFS 2.2 闪存，因此数据传输和加载速度更快。

	Lenovo Smart Paper	Huawei MatePad Paper	Xiaomi Pad 6	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		745%	1450%	307%	122%	720%
Sequential Read 256KB	163	880.1 440%	1673.97 927%	277.2 70%	273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=201) 67%	850 ?(163 - 3414, n=68, last 2 years) 421%
Sequential Write 256KB	139	256.2 84%	745.32 436%	210.4 51%	176.8 ?(40 - 274, n=201) 27%	532 ?(78.2 - 2528, n=68, last 2 years) 283%
Random Read 4KB	25.3	145.6 475%	298.45 1080%	105.1 315%	59.1 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=201) 134%	167 ?(18.4 - 451, n=68, last 2 years) 560%
Random Write 4KB	8.8	183.1 1981%	304.34 3358%	78.5 792%	31.7 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=201) 260%	150.8 ?(8.23 - 503, n=68, last 2 years) 1614%

游戏 - 基础知识

除了纸牌等非常简单的游戏外，这款电子墨水平板电脑几乎无法玩游戏。SoC 的薄弱组件也拖慢了游戏体验。

这款平板电脑不允许我们启用 USB 调试，因此我们无法进行任何游戏基准测试。

排放 - 几乎不升温，无节流

温度

机壳的最高温度为 34.1 °C，你可以感觉到一点热量，但绝不会感到不舒服。这意味着平板电脑不会过热，SoC 在散热方面也没有问题。在 3DMark 和 Wild Life Extreme 的压力测试中，系统达到了较低但稳定的数值，即使在基准测试运行 20 次之后也是如此。

Max. Load

Idle


28.8 °C	29.4 °C	28.4 °C
30.9 °C	30.1 °C	28.8 °C
34.1 °C	32.5 °C	29.1 °C

Maximum: 34.1 °C
Average: 30.2 °C


28.9 °C	29.1 °C	29.5 °C
29.2 °C	30.8 °C	31.8 °C
30.1 °C	32.2 °C	32.6 °C

Maximum: 32.6 °C
Average: 30.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.2 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø1.728 (1.71-1.735)

Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø11.3 (10.9-11.3)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.5 (21.1-25.4)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.14 (3.13-3.16)

Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.447 (0.4391-0.4529)

Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.74 (3.73-3.75)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø6.27 (6.1-7.39)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.799 (0.789-0.809)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei MatePad Paper	99.2 (3.73^min - 3.75^max) % +2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	97.5 (0.789^min - 0.809^max) % +1%
Lenovo Smart Paper	96.9 (0.4391^min - 0.4529^max) %
Xiaomi Pad 6	82.5 (6.1^min - 7.39^max) % -15%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	99.3 (3.13^min - 3.16^max) % +1%
Lenovo Smart Paper	98.6 (1.71^min - 1.735^max) %
Huawei MatePad Paper	96.5 (10.9^min - 11.3^max) % -2%
Xiaomi Pad 6	83.1 (21.1^min - 25.4^max) % -16%

Legend

Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, ARM Mali-G57 MP6, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

发言人

联想没有在 Smart Paper 中安装任何扬声器，这让有声读物爱好者们感到很无奈。通过 USB-C 端口和适配器向耳机或扬声器输出音频也是不可能的。

你只能通过蓝牙聆听声音。在我们的测试中，声音信号被证明是干净和良好的。遗憾的是，Smart Paper 并没有让我们了解可以使用哪些编解码器，但我们通过索尼的蓝牙耳机获得了 LDAC 信号，因此至少可以使用这一标准。

恼人：由于联想的 Smart Paper 没有物理音量控制，因此你必须直接在平板电脑上或通过耳机/外置扬声器调节音量。

电源管理 - 日常使用中的耐力

耗电量

在我们的能耗测试中，联想智能纸虽然性能不高，但对部分部件的要求很高，能耗相当大。在满载情况下，耗电量高达 7.1 瓦。

显示屏背光显然是最大的耗电设备之一。不过，如果将其关闭，显示屏不更新，就不会消耗能量，因为屏幕中的白色和黑色墨水颗粒可以在没有电源的情况下保持状态。

平板电脑的充电功率可达 10 瓦。当电池完全耗尽时，您最多需要等待 3 个小时，充电指示灯才会再次显示 100% 电量。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.1 Watt
Idle	1.1 / 1.5 / 1.7 Watt
Load	4.2 / 7.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Lenovo Smart Paper 3500 mAh	Huawei MatePad Paper 3625 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 6 8840 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh
Power Consumption		20%	-143%	-54%
Idle Minimum *	1.1	0.6 45%	0.96 13%	1.9 -73%
Idle Average *	1.5	1.2 20%	4.91 -227%	2.1 -40%
Idle Maximum *	1.7	1.7 -0%	5.07 -198%	2.5 -47%
Load Average *	4.2	3.4 19%	11.8 -181%	7.6 -81%
Load Maximum *	7.1	5.8 18%	15.9 -124%	9 -27%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Smart Paper: Ø5.84 (4.16-7.49)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Smart Paper; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.52 (6.14-7.13)

Lenovo Smart Paper; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.794 (1.503-2.88)

运行时间

遗憾的是，我们的一些电池测试无法在 Smart Paper 上进行，因为这些测试要求屏幕亮度达到 150 cd/m²，而 Smart Paper 的显示屏无法达到这一要求。不过，这款平板电脑在高负载情况下的续航时间为 4:38 小时，比 MatePad Paper 多半个小时。

空闲测试相当于在背光关闭和 WLAN 禁用的情况下进行常规翻页。在这里您可以浏览文档 17:36 小时。当定期翻页时，平板电脑在全亮状态下的续航时间约为 9 小时。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		17h 36min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 38min

	Lenovo Smart Paper 3500 mAh	Huawei MatePad Paper 3625 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 6 8840 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh
Battery Runtime		-10%	50%	31%
Reader / Idle	1056	963 -9%	2154 104%	1952 85%
Load	278	249 -10%	265 -5%	213 -23%
H.264			741	1002
WiFi v1.3			823	861

Pros

+ 出色的铝制外壳

+ 附带钢笔和文件夹

+ 在明亮环境下也能清晰阅读

+ 无 PWM 闪烁

+ 文字清晰度高

+ 运行时间长

Cons

- 性能储备极少

- 内存速度慢

- 无生物识别解锁功能

- 无扬声器

- 相对较重

- 视频和游戏功能非常有限

- 无摄像头

结论 - 可惜动力不足

联想 Smart Paper 是一款有趣的设备，其高品质的设计让人一见倾心：精美的铝制外壳非常稳固，倒角边缘也很美观。此外，该设备还附带一个保护套和一支被动输入手写笔，后者可以让你像在纸上写字一样记笔记。如果需要，还可以直接自动转换成正楷字母。

不过，联想 Smart Paper 与其竞争对手相比，还存在不少市场难点：一方面，这款 10.3 英寸的平板电脑相当重，重量超过 400 克。如果你长时间手持该设备，你就会开始注意到它与更轻的平板电脑（如华为 MatePad Paper.

它的处理器性能也相对较低，安装应用程序有点麻烦。此外，它没有扬声器、音量摇杆、microSD 卡插槽或指纹传感器，这些简陋的功能也令人失望。为了享受有声读物，你需要一副蓝牙耳机。

另一方面，联想智能纸在完成本职工作方面表现出色：记笔记、阅读书籍和文档、在网上快速搜索，或者写一两封邮件。

联想 Smart Paper 是一款优秀的数字笔记本、可靠的文档阅读器，在一定程度上也是上网冲浪的好帮手。遗憾的是，这款电子墨水平板电脑实在是太弱了，而且不灵活，无法胜任任何要求更高的任务。

当然，你无法在电子墨水显示屏上运行任何图形要求较高的应用程序，但特别是像MatePad Paper等设备提供了更大的功率、扬声器和指纹扫描仪--这为用户提供了更大的灵活性。

如果你不大可能使用电子墨水显示屏的笔记功能或特殊功能（如在强光下的良好可读性和良好的对比度），那么无论如何，选择传统平板电脑会更有意义。

价格和供应情况

联想智能纸的最高售价为 399 美元，但目前在美国还没有销售。您可以在联想的英国网站上找到它售价为 400 英镑（约合 510 美元）。

Lenovo Smart Paper - 2023-08-15 08/15/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

87 / 98 → 88%

Keyboard

62 / 80 → 77%

Pointing Device

78%

Connectivity

23 / 70 → 33%

Weight

85 / 40-88 → 93%

Battery

83%

Display

78%

Games Performance

6 / 78 → 8%

Application Performance

35 / 92 → 38%

Temperature

93%

Noise

100%

Audio

30 / 91 → 33%

Average

63%

75%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 219 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 391291 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想 Smart Paper 评测--稳定金属外壳中的电子墨水平板电脑

Florian Schmitt, 2023-08-18 (Update: 2023-08-18)