Blackview Tab 13评测--4G平板电脑有很多配件和恼人的应用程序
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.8 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Blackview Tab 13 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 450 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
| 81.2 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Huawei MatePad SE SD 680, Adreno 610 | 440 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 10.40" | 2000x1200 | |
| 82.5 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 465 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 10.61" | 2000x1200 | |
| 81 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2 | 508 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 10.50" | 1920x1200 |
外壳和功能 - 轻巧的金属外壳
Blackview Tab 13并没有一个巨大的13英寸屏幕，正如人们从名字上所认为的那样。相反，与竞争对手相比，它有一个略小的10.1英寸屏幕。450克的重量在通常范围内，尺寸也很紧凑。
制造商将正面的边缘设计成四边同样宽。它们的选择很好，这样你就可以用手握住平板电脑，而不会意外地触发触摸屏，而且Tab 13仍然有一个现代的外观。
和大多数同价位的平板电脑一样，这款黑维尤平板电脑也配备了金属外壳。有三种内敛的颜色可供选择：柔和的蓝色、灰色和银色。背板和框架是由铝制成的，由于部件之间没有明显的接缝，所以可能是由一块金属制成的。另一方面，向屏幕的过渡是明显的，而且有点粗糙，这使质量印象有点降低。
有了128GB的大容量存储和6GB的内存，在这个价格范围内你可以得到一个茂盛的存储配置。不幸的是，NFC是不可用的，所以你必须做的是没有移动支付服务。例如，可选择的键盘盖可以通过底部的pogo PIN端口连接。然而，盒子里已经有了一些附件，例如，基于Apple's Smart Folio的盖子，它可以折叠成一个支架。
microSD读卡器与两个SIM卡插槽是分开的。在阅读过程中，它与我们的参考微型SD卡Angelbird V60的测试工作非常迅速，但在写入速度上有轻微问题。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Tablet (7.61 - 58.4, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Blackview Tab 13 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Huawei MatePad SE (Angelbird V60) | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 恼人的应用程序
当然，WiFi 5也在船上，与其他价格范围内的平板电脑相比，Blackview Tab 13甚至实现了稍快的传输速率。
除此之外，该平板电脑甚至是一个可移动的设备，但不支持太多的LTE频率。作为回报，在室内的接收效果相当不错，甚至还有电话功能。
事实上，一个伟大的想法是，黑视与Simo公司合作，该公司提供国际移动费。这意味着Blackview Tab 13可以在国外使用，没有WLAN和漫游费，甚至可以作为WLAN热点使用，前提是Simo的相应资费。
问题是，Simo的应用程序是预装的，无法删除。这还是可以忍受的，但该应用会显示一个无法永久停用的循环通知，并不断提示你注册一个费率。Blackview迫切需要改进这一点，因为它可能会惹恼大多数用户。
该软件基于Android 12，其顶部是内部的DokeOS，包括相当广泛的PC模式，使操作更适应鼠标和键盘。这可以在连接键盘时自动激活或在选项中手动激活。应用程序可以被隔离在所谓的 "冷库 "中，以便它们不能访问平板电脑的数据和功能，直到用户手动激活它们。安全更新是2022年10月的，因此在测试时已经过时。
触摸屏的运行频率只有60赫兹，但操作可靠且相当流畅。在生物识别安全方面，Blackview Tab 13可以用用户的脸解锁。这通过前置摄像头进行，而且相当可靠，尽管你必须移动平板电脑以找到正确的识别位置。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Huawei MatePad SE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Huawei MatePad SE | |
相机 - 用于快照
与通常的平板电脑一样，照片质量在制造商的关注中相当少：大多数人使用智能手机或直接用相机拍照。我们的测试设备配备了一个1300万像素的传感器作为主镜头，并由一个30万像素的支持摄像头作为补充。你不能用后者拍摄自己的照片，但它支持人像的模糊效果。
乍一看，主摄像头在近距离拍摄的照片还算清晰，但你可以看到，当你放大时，细节只能非常粗略地显示。然后，周围一些地方的清晰度就会下降，整张照片看起来非常有颗粒感。这也适用于具有高对比度的黑暗环境，适度的提亮是成功的，但图像看起来结构非常粗糙。
这种效果也可以在照相馆里观察到。一般来说，对比度还可以，在光线良好的情况下，图像的清晰度也是合格的。在只有1勒克斯的照明条件下，该相机是无法使用的。
视频可以在1080p和最多30帧的情况下录制。自动对焦在这里时常有点慢，但随后反应精确，没有抽风。亮度调节也可以工作得更快一点，但它也能令人满意地工作。
用800万像素的自拍相机拍摄的照片有时会很模糊。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
显示屏 - 全高清，无宽屏
该屏幕可以拥有一个扩大的全高清分辨率。然而，我们不应该高兴得太早。Blackview未能为该平板电脑获得Widevine认证，因此来自主要供应商的流媒体只能以标清方式播放，因此没有使用可能的分辨率。
该屏幕在亮度方面也没有说服力：我们测量的最大亮度为344cd/m²，明显低于大多数同类设备。考虑到该平板电脑的4G功能，这一点尤其令人讨厌，有了它，你可以在户外轻松地访问互联网。现在由于屏幕的低亮度，这变得更加困难。
在灰度中可以看到轻微的蓝色偏移，蓝色的色调有时显示得非常不准确。我们没有注意到任何PWM。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 344 cd/m²
Contrast: 1274:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
89.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.106
| Blackview Tab 13 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Huawei MatePad SE IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4" | Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 10.6" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -7% | 28% | -30% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.9 ? | 44.5 ? -24% | 34.52 ? 4% | 53.6 ? -49% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32.2 ? | 28.6 ? 11% | 15.81 ? 51% | 35.6 ? -11% |
| PWM Frequency | 32730 | |||
| Screen | 11% | 23% | -28% | |
| Brightness middle | 344 | 398 16% | 510 48% | 368 7% |
| Brightness | 330 | 368 12% | 480 45% | 346 5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 87 -6% | 85 -9% | 91 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.46 -70% | 0.49 -81% | 0.61 -126% |
| Contrast | 1274 | 865 -32% | 1041 -18% | 603 -53% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.32 | 2.17 59% | 1.8 66% | 6.9 -30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.27 | 4.32 62% | 3.7 67% | 11.4 -1% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 3.1 50% | 2.2 65% | 7.7 -24% |
| Gamma | 2.106 104% | 2.214 99% | 2.17 101% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 8023 81% | 7245 90% | 6907 94% | 8547 76% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
8% | 26% /
24% | -29% /
-28% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 35.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8456 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命--运行时间良好的Blackview平板电脑
ǞǞǞ Helio G85来自联发科的SoC是廉价平板电脑的一个非常好的选择。在大多数基准测试中，它可以跟上或超过对比设备的表现。在日常使用中，你可以流畅地浏览菜单，但在多任务和更复杂的应用程序中，你必须限制自己或忍受停顿。
Blackview安装了大量的存储空间，但不幸的是只有缓慢的eMMC闪存。这仍然使该平板电脑与同类产品相提并论，但制造商本来有一个很好的机会将自己从竞争中区分出来。
这款平板电脑的温升总体上是在限制范围内。它只在前置摄像头的区域明显，那里可能是SoC的位置，但它仍然非常适中。
Blackview在其平板电脑上安装了立体声扬声器。这些声音听起来一般：它们可以变得相当响亮，但有点高音重。要真正享受音乐或电影的声音，应该连接耳机或外部扬声器，这可以通过USB-C或蓝牙实现。蓝牙编解码器包括SBC、AAC、LDAC、aptX和aptX HD。
凭借其7280毫安时的电池，Blackview Tab 13拥有强大的能量储存，并在我们的Wi-Fi测试中管理15：26小时。因此，它可以胜过所有的对手，有时甚至非常明显。在日常使用中，它绝对足以满足一个工作日的需要，甚至在少用的情况下，还可以满足第二个工作日的需要。这款平板电脑最多只能以10瓦的功率充电，包装中包括一个充电器。直到平板电脑再次充满电，最多需要3:30小时。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (3 - 122, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (7.5 - 22, n=17) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Huawei MatePad SE | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (3.9 - 340, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Huawei MatePad SE | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (8 - 9.7, n=17) | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 106.4, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (5 - 13, n=17) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
| Huawei MatePad SE | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (1.4 - 114.5, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (3.1 - 3.5, n=17) | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
| Huawei MatePad SE | |
| Geekbench 6.0 | |
| Single-Core | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (408 - 429, n=3) | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Multi-Core | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (1315 - 1442, n=3) | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | Huawei MatePad SE | Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -19% | 1% | -19% | 3% | 287% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 289.1 | 293.6 2% | 393.23 36% | 255.1 -12% | 294 ? 2% | 1255 ? 334% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 173.1 | 99.5 -43% | 234.88 36% | 101.1 -42% | 195.8 ? 13% | 890 ? 414% |
| Random Read 4KB | 79 | 61.8 -22% | 75.12 -5% | 68.3 -14% | 83.9 ? 6% | 206 ? 161% |
| Random Write 4KB | 63.1 | 54 -14% | 23.97 -62% | 57.5 -9% | 56.7 ? -10% | 214 ? 239% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.2 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
演讲者
Blackview Tab 13 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Huawei MatePad SE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 1764, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Huawei MatePad SE | |
Pros
Cons
评语 - 如果软件更好就好了......
实际上，我们非常喜欢Blackview Tab 13，因为它有别致的外壳，附带的盖子，以及集成的PC模式。此外，在这个价格范围内，还有体面的性能率和出色的存储配置。电池运行时间和通信选项，包括4G功能和电话模式，也完全令人信服。
然而，昏暗的屏幕和摄像头却难以令人信服。然而，最大的问题是软件：一方面，在测试时，安全补丁已近6个月。另一方面，预装的Simo应用程序很烦人，因为它不能被永久删除或停用，而且不断发送通知，也不能被永久禁用。Widevine认证也没有，这对流媒体爱好者来说应该是不可原谅的。
由于软件方面的强大弱点，我们从总体评分中扣除了一个百分点。
Blackview Tab 13是一款很好的平板电脑，用很少的钱提供很多东西。然而，侵入性的预装软件是令人讨厌的。
华为 华为MatePad SE已经完成了它的Widevine作业，但你必须在这里做没有谷歌服务的事情。与联想Tab M10 Plus你甚至可以得到对手写笔的支持。
Blackview Tab 13
- 02/26/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
