Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarBlackview Tab 13评测--4G平板电脑有很多配件和恼人的应用程序
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.8 % | 02/2023 | Blackview Tab 13 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 450 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
| 81.2 % | 01/2023 | Huawei MatePad SE SD 680, Adreno 610 | 440 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 10.40" | 2000x1200 | |
| 82.5 % | 07/2022 | Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 465 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 10.61" | 2000x1200 | |
| 81 % | 02/2022 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2 | 508 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 10.50" | 1920x1200 |
外壳和功能 - 轻巧的金属外壳
Blackview Tab 13并没有一个巨大的13英寸屏幕，正如人们从名字上所认为的那样。相反，与竞争对手相比，它有一个略小的10.1英寸屏幕。450克的重量在通常范围内，尺寸也很紧凑。
制造商将正面的边缘设计成四边同样宽。它们的选择很好，这样你就可以用手握住平板电脑，而不会意外地触发触摸屏，而且Tab 13仍然有一个现代的外观。
和大多数同价位的平板电脑一样，这款黑维尤平板电脑也配备了金属外壳。有三种内敛的颜色可供选择：柔和的蓝色、灰色和银色。背板和框架是由铝制成的，由于部件之间没有明显的接缝，所以可能是由一块金属制成的。另一方面，向屏幕的过渡是明显的，而且有点粗糙，这使质量印象有点降低。
有了128GB的大容量存储和6GB的内存，在这个价格范围内你可以得到一个茂盛的存储配置。不幸的是，NFC是不可用的，所以你必须做的是没有移动支付服务。例如，可选择的键盘盖可以通过底部的pogo PIN端口连接。然而，盒子里已经有了一些附件，例如，基于Apple's Smart Folio的盖子，它可以折叠成一个支架。
microSD读卡器与两个SIM卡插槽是分开的。在阅读过程中，它与我们的参考微型SD卡Angelbird V60的测试工作非常迅速，但在写入速度上有轻微问题。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Tablet (9.48 - 101.6, n=38, last 2 years) | |
| Blackview Tab 13 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Huawei MatePad SE (Angelbird V60) | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 恼人的应用程序
当然，WiFi 5也在船上，与其他价格范围内的平板电脑相比，Blackview Tab 13甚至实现了稍快的传输速率。
除此之外，该平板电脑甚至是一个可移动的设备，但不支持太多的LTE频率。作为回报，在室内的接收效果相当不错，甚至还有电话功能。
事实上，一个伟大的想法是，黑视与Simo公司合作，该公司提供国际移动费。这意味着Blackview Tab 13可以在国外使用，没有WLAN和漫游费，甚至可以作为WLAN热点使用，前提是Simo的相应资费。
问题是，Simo的应用程序是预装的，无法删除。这还是可以忍受的，但该应用会显示一个无法永久停用的循环通知，并不断提示你注册一个费率。Blackview迫切需要改进这一点，因为它可能会惹恼大多数用户。
该软件基于Android 12，其顶部是内部的DokeOS，包括相当广泛的PC模式，使操作更适应鼠标和键盘。这可以在连接键盘时自动激活或在选项中手动激活。应用程序可以被隔离在所谓的 "冷库 "中，以便它们不能访问平板电脑的数据和功能，直到用户手动激活它们。安全更新是2022年10月的，因此在测试时已经过时。
触摸屏的运行频率只有60赫兹，但操作可靠且相当流畅。在生物识别安全方面，Blackview Tab 13可以用用户的脸解锁。这通过前置摄像头进行，而且相当可靠，尽管你必须移动平板电脑以找到正确的识别位置。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Huawei MatePad SE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Huawei MatePad SE | |
相机 - 用于快照
与通常的平板电脑一样，照片质量在制造商的关注中相当少：大多数人使用智能手机或直接用相机拍照。我们的测试设备配备了一个1300万像素的传感器作为主镜头，并由一个30万像素的支持摄像头作为补充。你不能用后者拍摄自己的照片，但它支持人像的模糊效果。
乍一看，主摄像头在近距离拍摄的照片还算清晰，但你可以看到，当你放大时，细节只能非常粗略地显示。然后，周围一些地方的清晰度就会下降，整张照片看起来非常有颗粒感。这也适用于具有高对比度的黑暗环境，适度的提亮是成功的，但图像看起来结构非常粗糙。
这种效果也可以在照相馆里观察到。一般来说，对比度还可以，在光线良好的情况下，图像的清晰度也是合格的。在只有1勒克斯的照明条件下，该相机是无法使用的。
视频可以在1080p和最多30帧的情况下录制。自动对焦在这里时常有点慢，但随后反应精确，没有抽风。亮度调节也可以工作得更快一点，但它也能令人满意地工作。
用800万像素的自拍相机拍摄的照片有时会很模糊。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
显示屏 - 全高清，无宽屏
该屏幕可以拥有一个扩大的全高清分辨率。然而，我们不应该高兴得太早。Blackview未能为该平板电脑获得Widevine认证，因此来自主要供应商的流媒体只能以标清方式播放，因此没有使用可能的分辨率。
该屏幕在亮度方面也没有说服力：我们测量的最大亮度为344cd/m²，明显低于大多数同类设备。考虑到该平板电脑的4G功能，这一点尤其令人讨厌，有了它，你可以在户外轻松地访问互联网。现在由于屏幕的低亮度，这变得更加困难。
在灰度中可以看到轻微的蓝色偏移，蓝色的色调有时显示得非常不准确。我们没有注意到任何PWM。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 344 cd/m²
Contrast: 1274:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.32 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
89.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.106
| Blackview Tab 13 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10 | Huawei MatePad SE IPS, 2000x1200, 10.40 | Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 10.61 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -7% | 28% | -30% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.9 ? | 44.5 ? -24% | 34.52 ? 4% | 53.6 ? -49% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32.2 ? | 28.6 ? 11% | 15.81 ? 51% | 35.6 ? -11% |
| PWM Frequency | 32730 | |||
| Screen | 11% | 23% | -28% | |
| Brightness middle | 344 | 398 16% | 510 48% | 368 7% |
| Brightness | 330 | 368 12% | 480 45% | 346 5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 87 -6% | 85 -9% | 91 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.46 -70% | 0.49 -81% | 0.61 -126% |
| Contrast | 1274 | 865 -32% | 1041 -18% | 603 -53% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.32 | 2.17 59% | 1.8 66% | 6.9 -30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.27 | 4.32 62% | 3.7 67% | 11.4 -1% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 3.1 50% | 2.2 65% | 7.7 -24% |
| Gamma | 2.106 104% | 2.214 99% | 2.17 101% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 8023 81% | 7245 90% | 6907 94% | 8547 76% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
8% | 26% /
24% | -29% /
-28% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 35.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19035 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命--运行时间良好的Blackview平板电脑
ǞǞǞ Helio G85来自联发科的SoC是廉价平板电脑的一个非常好的选择。在大多数基准测试中，它可以跟上或超过对比设备的表现。在日常使用中，你可以流畅地浏览菜单，但在多任务和更复杂的应用程序中，你必须限制自己或忍受停顿。
Blackview安装了大量的存储空间，但不幸的是只有缓慢的eMMC闪存。这仍然使该平板电脑与同类产品相提并论，但制造商本来有一个很好的机会将自己从竞争中区分出来。
这款平板电脑的温升总体上是在限制范围内。它只在前置摄像头的区域明显，那里可能是SoC的位置，但它仍然非常适中。
Blackview在其平板电脑上安装了立体声扬声器。这些声音听起来一般：它们可以变得相当响亮，但有点高音重。要真正享受音乐或电影的声音，应该连接耳机或外部扬声器，这可以通过USB-C或蓝牙实现。蓝牙编解码器包括SBC、AAC、LDAC、aptX和aptX HD。
凭借其7280毫安时的电池，Blackview Tab 13拥有强大的能量储存，并在我们的Wi-Fi测试中管理15：26小时。因此，它可以胜过所有的对手，有时甚至非常明显。在日常使用中，它绝对足以满足一个工作日的需要，甚至在少用的情况下，还可以满足第二个工作日的需要。这款平板电脑最多只能以10瓦的功率充电，包装中包括一个充电器。直到平板电脑再次充满电，最多需要3:30小时。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (3.6 - 111, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (7.5 - 22, n=12) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Huawei MatePad SE | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.5 - 279, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Huawei MatePad SE | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (8 - 9.7, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.2 - 97.3, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (5 - 13, n=12) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
| Huawei MatePad SE | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (0.9 - 90, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (3.1 - 3.5, n=12) | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
| Huawei MatePad SE | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (5004 - 74614, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (10299 - 13252, n=9) | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Huawei MatePad SE | |
| Geekbench 6 | |
| Single-Core | |
| Average of class Tablet (408 - 1663, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (408 - 429, n=3) | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Tablet (1361 - 4130, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (1315 - 1442, n=3) | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | Huawei MatePad SE | Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -19% | 1% | -19% | 0% | 130% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 289.1 | 293.6 2% | 393.23 36% | 255.1 -12% | 289 ? 0% | 761 ? 163% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 173.1 | 99.5 -43% | 234.88 36% | 101.1 -42% | 193.5 ? 12% | 452 ? 161% |
| Random Read 4KB | 79 | 61.8 -22% | 75.12 -5% | 68.3 -14% | 82.7 ? 5% | 140.3 ? 78% |
| Random Write 4KB | 63.1 | 54 -14% | 23.97 -62% | 57.5 -9% | 53 ? -16% | 136.2 ? 116% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.5 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.2 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
演讲者
Blackview Tab 13 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
Huawei MatePad SE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Blackview Tab 13 | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
| Average of class Tablet (437 - 1273, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
| Huawei MatePad SE | |
Pros
Cons
评语 - 如果软件更好就好了......
实际上，我们非常喜欢Blackview Tab 13，因为它有别致的外壳，附带的盖子，以及集成的PC模式。此外，在这个价格范围内，还有体面的性能率和出色的存储配置。电池运行时间和通信选项，包括4G功能和电话模式，也完全令人信服。
然而，昏暗的屏幕和摄像头却难以令人信服。然而，最大的问题是软件：一方面，在测试时，安全补丁已近6个月。另一方面，预装的Simo应用程序很烦人，因为它不能被永久删除或停用，而且不断发送通知，也不能被永久禁用。Widevine认证也没有，这对流媒体爱好者来说应该是不可原谅的。
由于软件方面的强大弱点，我们从总体评分中扣除了一个百分点。
Blackview Tab 13是一款很好的平板电脑，用很少的钱提供很多东西。然而，侵入性的预装软件是令人讨厌的。
华为 华为MatePad SE已经完成了它的Widevine作业，但你必须在这里做没有谷歌服务的事情。与联想Tab M10 Plus你甚至可以得到对手写笔的支持。
Blackview Tab 13
-
02/26/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
