Blackview Tab 13评测--4G平板电脑有很多配件和恼人的应用程序
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.8 % | 02/2023 | Blackview Tab 13 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 450 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
81.2 % | 01/2023 | Huawei MatePad SE SD 680, Adreno 610 | 440 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 10.40" | 2000x1200 | |
82.5 % | 07/2022 | Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 465 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 10.61" | 2000x1200 | |
81 % | 02/2022 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2 | 508 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 10.50" | 1920x1200 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和功能 - 轻巧的金属外壳
Blackview Tab 13并没有一个巨大的13英寸屏幕,正如人们从名字上所认为的那样。相反,与竞争对手相比,它有一个略小的10.1英寸屏幕。450克的重量在通常范围内,尺寸也很紧凑。
制造商将正面的边缘设计成四边同样宽。它们的选择很好,这样你就可以用手握住平板电脑,而不会意外地触发触摸屏,而且Tab 13仍然有一个现代的外观。
和大多数同价位的平板电脑一样,这款黑维尤平板电脑也配备了金属外壳。有三种内敛的颜色可供选择:柔和的蓝色、灰色和银色。背板和框架是由铝制成的,由于部件之间没有明显的接缝,所以可能是由一块金属制成的。另一方面,向屏幕的过渡是明显的,而且有点粗糙,这使质量印象有点降低。
有了128GB的大容量存储和6GB的内存,在这个价格范围内你可以得到一个茂盛的存储配置。不幸的是,NFC是不可用的,所以你必须做的是没有移动支付服务。例如,可选择的键盘盖可以通过底部的pogo PIN端口连接。然而,盒子里已经有了一些附件,例如,基于Apple's Smart Folio的盖子,它可以折叠成一个支架。
microSD读卡器与两个SIM卡插槽是分开的。在阅读过程中,它与我们的参考微型SD卡Angelbird V60的测试工作非常迅速,但在写入速度上有轻微问题。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Tablet (9.48 - 101.6, n=38, last 2 years) | |
Blackview Tab 13 (Angelbird V60) | |
Huawei MatePad SE (Angelbird V60) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 恼人的应用程序
当然,WiFi 5也在船上,与其他价格范围内的平板电脑相比,Blackview Tab 13甚至实现了稍快的传输速率。
除此之外,该平板电脑甚至是一个可移动的设备,但不支持太多的LTE频率。作为回报,在室内的接收效果相当不错,甚至还有电话功能。
事实上,一个伟大的想法是,黑视与Simo公司合作,该公司提供国际移动费。这意味着Blackview Tab 13可以在国外使用,没有WLAN和漫游费,甚至可以作为WLAN热点使用,前提是Simo的相应资费。
问题是,Simo的应用程序是预装的,无法删除。这还是可以忍受的,但该应用会显示一个无法永久停用的循环通知,并不断提示你注册一个费率。Blackview迫切需要改进这一点,因为它可能会惹恼大多数用户。
该软件基于Android 12,其顶部是内部的DokeOS,包括相当广泛的PC模式,使操作更适应鼠标和键盘。这可以在连接键盘时自动激活或在选项中手动激活。应用程序可以被隔离在所谓的 "冷库 "中,以便它们不能访问平板电脑的数据和功能,直到用户手动激活它们。安全更新是2022年10月的,因此在测试时已经过时。
触摸屏的运行频率只有60赫兹,但操作可靠且相当流畅。在生物识别安全方面,Blackview Tab 13可以用用户的脸解锁。这通过前置摄像头进行,而且相当可靠,尽管你必须移动平板电脑以找到正确的识别位置。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Blackview Tab 13 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
Blackview Tab 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
相机 - 用于快照
与通常的平板电脑一样,照片质量在制造商的关注中相当少:大多数人使用智能手机或直接用相机拍照。我们的测试设备配备了一个1300万像素的传感器作为主镜头,并由一个30万像素的支持摄像头作为补充。你不能用后者拍摄自己的照片,但它支持人像的模糊效果。
乍一看,主摄像头在近距离拍摄的照片还算清晰,但你可以看到,当你放大时,细节只能非常粗略地显示。然后,周围一些地方的清晰度就会下降,整张照片看起来非常有颗粒感。这也适用于具有高对比度的黑暗环境,适度的提亮是成功的,但图像看起来结构非常粗糙。
这种效果也可以在照相馆里观察到。一般来说,对比度还可以,在光线良好的情况下,图像的清晰度也是合格的。在只有1勒克斯的照明条件下,该相机是无法使用的。
视频可以在1080p和最多30帧的情况下录制。自动对焦在这里时常有点慢,但随后反应精确,没有抽风。亮度调节也可以工作得更快一点,但它也能令人满意地工作。
用800万像素的自拍相机拍摄的照片有时会很模糊。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light

显示屏 - 全高清,无宽屏
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 344 cd/m²
Contrast: 1274:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.32 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
89.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.106
Blackview Tab 13 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10 | Huawei MatePad SE IPS, 2000x1200, 10.40 | Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 10.61 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.50 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -7% | 28% | -30% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.9 ? | 44.5 ? -24% | 34.52 ? 4% | 53.6 ? -49% |
Response Time Black / White * | 32.2 ? | 28.6 ? 11% | 15.81 ? 51% | 35.6 ? -11% |
PWM Frequency | 32730 | |||
Screen | 11% | 23% | -28% | |
Brightness middle | 344 | 398 16% | 510 48% | 368 7% |
Brightness | 330 | 368 12% | 480 45% | 346 5% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 87 -6% | 85 -9% | 91 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.46 -70% | 0.49 -81% | 0.61 -126% |
Contrast | 1274 | 865 -32% | 1041 -18% | 603 -53% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.32 | 2.17 59% | 1.8 66% | 6.9 -30% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.27 | 4.32 62% | 3.7 67% | 11.4 -1% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 3.1 50% | 2.2 65% | 7.7 -24% |
Gamma | 2.106 104% | 2.214 99% | 2.17 101% | 2.16 102% |
CCT | 8023 81% | 7245 90% | 6907 94% | 8547 76% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
8% | 26% /
24% | -29% /
-28% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.1 ms rise | |
↘ 18.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
35.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.6 ms rise | |
↘ 17.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19035 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命--运行时间良好的Blackview平板电脑
ǞǞǞ Helio G85来自联发科的SoC是廉价平板电脑的一个非常好的选择。在大多数基准测试中,它可以跟上或超过对比设备的表现。在日常使用中,你可以流畅地浏览菜单,但在多任务和更复杂的应用程序中,你必须限制自己或忍受停顿。
Blackview安装了大量的存储空间,但不幸的是只有缓慢的eMMC闪存。这仍然使该平板电脑与同类产品相提并论,但制造商本来有一个很好的机会将自己从竞争中区分出来。
这款平板电脑的温升总体上是在限制范围内。它只在前置摄像头的区域明显,那里可能是SoC的位置,但它仍然非常适中。
Blackview在其平板电脑上安装了立体声扬声器。这些声音听起来一般:它们可以变得相当响亮,但有点高音重。要真正享受音乐或电影的声音,应该连接耳机或外部扬声器,这可以通过USB-C或蓝牙实现。蓝牙编解码器包括SBC、AAC、LDAC、aptX和aptX HD。
凭借其7280毫安时的电池,Blackview Tab 13拥有强大的能量储存,并在我们的Wi-Fi测试中管理15:26小时。因此,它可以胜过所有的对手,有时甚至非常明显。在日常使用中,它绝对足以满足一个工作日的需要,甚至在少用的情况下,还可以满足第二个工作日的需要。这款平板电脑最多只能以10瓦的功率充电,包装中包括一个充电器。直到平板电脑再次充满电,最多需要3:30小时。
GFXBench | |
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Average of class Tablet (3.6 - 111, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (7.5 - 22, n=12) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
Blackview Tab 13 | |
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Average of class Tablet (2.5 - 279, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (8 - 9.7, n=12) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
Blackview Tab 13 | |
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Average of class Tablet (2.2 - 97.3, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (5 - 13, n=12) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Blackview Tab 13 | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Average of class Tablet (0.9 - 90, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (3.1 - 3.5, n=12) | |
Blackview Tab 13 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (5004 - 74614, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (10299 - 13252, n=9) | |
Blackview Tab 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
Geekbench 6 | |
Single-Core | |
Average of class Tablet (408 - 1663, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (408 - 429, n=3) | |
Blackview Tab 13 | |
Multi-Core | |
Average of class Tablet (1361 - 4130, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (1315 - 1442, n=3) | |
Blackview Tab 13 |
Blackview Tab 13 | Huawei MatePad SE | Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -19% | 1% | -19% | 0% | 130% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 289.1 | 293.6 2% | 393.23 36% | 255.1 -12% | 289 ? 0% | 761 ? 163% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 173.1 | 99.5 -43% | 234.88 36% | 101.1 -42% | 193.5 ? 12% | 452 ? 161% |
Random Read 4KB | 79 | 61.8 -22% | 75.12 -5% | 68.3 -14% | 82.7 ? 5% | 140.3 ? 78% |
Random Write 4KB | 63.1 | 54 -14% | 23.97 -62% | 57.5 -9% | 53 ? -16% | 136.2 ? 116% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.5 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.2 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
演讲者
Blackview Tab 13 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
Huawei MatePad SE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
电池寿命
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Blackview Tab 13 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 | |
Average of class Tablet (437 - 1273, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
Pros
Cons
评语 - 如果软件更好就好了......
实际上,我们非常喜欢Blackview Tab 13,因为它有别致的外壳,附带的盖子,以及集成的PC模式。此外,在这个价格范围内,还有体面的性能率和出色的存储配置。电池运行时间和通信选项,包括4G功能和电话模式,也完全令人信服。
然而,昏暗的屏幕和摄像头却难以令人信服。然而,最大的问题是软件:一方面,在测试时,安全补丁已近6个月。另一方面,预装的Simo应用程序很烦人,因为它不能被永久删除或停用,而且不断发送通知,也不能被永久禁用。Widevine认证也没有,这对流媒体爱好者来说应该是不可原谅的。
由于软件方面的强大弱点,我们从总体评分中扣除了一个百分点。
Blackview Tab 13是一款很好的平板电脑,用很少的钱提供很多东西。然而,侵入性的预装软件是令人讨厌的。
华为 华为MatePad SE已经完成了它的Widevine作业,但你必须在这里做没有谷歌服务的事情。与联想Tab M10 Plus你甚至可以得到对手写笔的支持。
Blackview Tab 13
-
02/26/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.