结论——一款设计精良的简约办公翻盖式手机
戴尔 Pro 5 16 配备了大屏幕，但未提供许多用户可有可无的独立显卡或 4K 选项。 因此，其起售价更为合理，成为一款极具吸引力的简约型企业解决方案，尤其适合重视 AMD Pro 或 Intel vPro 环境的用户。此外，其可拆卸内存尤其值得一提，因为在其他大多数机型上，焊接式内存已逐渐成为常态。
搭载 Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 470 处理器时的原始性能，对于一款中端商务笔记本而言相当出色。请注意，虽然英特尔版本的处理器性能略逊于 AMD，但内存速度可能更快，因为目前仅英特尔平台支持 CAMM 配置。
有几个值得一提的小瑕疵，其中大部分很可能是为了节省成本而刻意为之。例如，与戴尔 Pro 7 14 不同，该机型仅在机身左侧边缘配备了 USB-C 充电接口。固态硬盘支持仅限于一条短款 M.2 2242 硬盘，也没有其他选项。 戴尔 Pro 7 上采用的轻质镁合金复合材料，在戴尔 Pro 5 上并未采用。此外，建议跳过低端显示屏选项，因为其色彩还原效果明显较差。尽管如此，丰富的集成端口以及可选的广域网接口和 800 万像素网络摄像头，应能满足大多数办公场景的需求。
Pros
+ 在同类产品中处理器性能出色
+ 可拆卸的 DDR5 SODIMM 内存条
+ WAN 和 OLED 为可选配置
+ 内置扬声器音量较大
+ 电池续航时间较长
Cons
- 不支持全尺寸 M.2 2280 SSD
- 基础显示选项的色彩表现欠佳
- CAMM 选项仅适用于英特尔 SKU
- 不支持辅助 SSD
- 无 4K 或 Arc B390 选项
$1,499.95
Dell Pro 16(Next-gen Latitude 3550) 16” FHD+ Display Business Laptop, Intel 10 Core i5-120U, 32GB DDR5 RAM, 1TB SSD, WiFi 6E + BT, Backlit Keyboard, HD Webcam, RJ-45, Win 11 Pro
正如戴尔 Pro 7 系列接替了旧款 Latitude 7000 系列一样，戴尔 Pro 5 系列也接替了旧款 Latitude 5000 系列。 戴尔 Pro 5 16 是一款中端商务翻盖式笔记本，但其处理器选项与价格更高的戴尔 Pro 7 系列有许多相同之处。
我们测试的这款戴尔 Pro 5 16 属于高端 AMD 配置，搭载 Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 470 Zen 5 处理器和 1600p 120 Hz IPS 显示屏，售价约为 4500 美元。 入门级型号则搭载 Ryzen AI 5 Pro 435 处理器、1200p 60 Hz 显示屏，内存容量大幅缩减，价格也低得多。该机型还提供英特尔酷睿第 3 代系列配置选项。
Dell Pro 5 16的替代产品包括其他中端商务笔记本，例如惠普EliteBook 8系列、微星Venture 16 AI或联想ThinkPad E系列。
更多戴尔评测：
规格
Dell Pro 5 16 P516265
Processor
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 12c/24t, 4 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 5, 8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c, 43 W PL2 / Short Burst, 33 W PL1 / Sustained, Gorgon Point
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon 890M, Core: 2590 MHz, RAM: 2800 MHz, DDR5, 32.0.22068.2003
Memory
64 GB
, DDR5-5600, SK Hynix, 46-45-45-90, Dual-Channel
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, BOE NS16M30, IPS, Dell P/N: 270R4, glossy: no, 120 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
SanDisk PC SN5100S, 1024 GB
Weight
2.034 kg, Power Supply: 327 g
Price
4500 USD
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
案例
连接性
沟通
| Networking | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
Dell Pro 5 16 P516265; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1486 (1449-1514) MBit/s
Dell Pro 5 16 P516265; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1495 (1437-1564) MBit/s
网络摄像头
13.6 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
18 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
维护
可持续发展
该机型的大部分部件由再生材料制成，其中风扇外壳、橡胶脚垫以及A、C和D盖板所含塑料中再生比例高达50%，A盖板所含再生铝比例高达50%，某些电池配置中所用钴的再生比例高达100%。 交流适配器和包装材料也分别由再生金属和再生纸制成。
配件与保修
虽然包装盒内没有额外配件，但我们很欣赏，若在美国购买，产品标配三年保修。
输入设备
显示
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE NS16M30 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 477.3 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 464.2 cd/m² Minimum: 24.5 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 470.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 2766:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.45 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}
calibrated: 0.6
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 7.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}
72.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
71% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
CCT: 7237 K
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 BOE NS16M30, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H LG Philips 160WV1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE N160JCA-ELN, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG BOE0D3E, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA NE160QDM-NX4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 144 Hz | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 24% | -41% | -44% | -3% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 71 | 99.5 40% | 40.7 -43% | 39.4 -45% | 68.5 -4% | 68.5 -4% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 61.1 -39% | 57.4 -43% | 98.3 -2% | 98.6 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 72.4 | 96.5 33% | 42 -42% | 40.7 -44% | 69.4 -4% | 70.4 -3% |
| Response Times | 97% | 27% | 26% | 16% | -31% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 38.3 ? | 0.65 ? 98% | 32.6 ? 15% | 26.7 ? 30% | 35.6 ? 7% | 50.2 ? -31% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 23.4 ? | 0.87 ? 96% | 14.2 ? 39% | 18.4 ? 21% | 17.5 ? 25% | 30.7 ? -31% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 240.2 ? | |||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 31 | |||||
| Screen | 11% | -86% | -66% | -13% | 4% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 470.3 | 395.4 -16% | 479 2% | 321.7 -32% | 413 -12% | 439.2 -7% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 464 | 392 -16% | 452 -3% | 306 -34% | 408 -12% | 405 -13% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 94 | 95 1% | 89 -5% | 91 -3% | 94 0% | 88 -6% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.17 | 0.51 -200% | 0.18 -6% | 0.2 -18% | 0.31 -82% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 2766 | 939 -66% | 1787 -35% | 2065 -25% | 1417 -49% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.45 | 3.69 17% | 4.1 8% | 6.11 -37% | 3.6 19% | 2.2 51% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.13 | 7.94 29% | 16.8 -51% | 19.43 -75% | 7.1 36% | 4.31 61% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.6 | 0.68 -13% | 3.8 -533% | 3.13 -422% | 1.5 -150% | 0.49 18% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.8 | 1.9 76% | 1.7 78% | 3.9 50% | 4.6 41% | 3.2 59% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.28 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.22 99% | 2.25 98% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 7237 90% | 6274 104% | 6777 96% | 6250 104% | 7461 87% | 6438 101% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 44% /
29% | -33% /
-60% | -28% /
-48% | 0% /
-7% | -10% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7757 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将戴尔优化器（Dell Optimizer）设置为“性能”模式。
处理器性能
Cinebench R15 多核循环测试
Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470: Ø2898 (2832.46-2983.29) Points
Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Core Ultra X7 358H: Ø2543 (2491.75-2985.52) Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215: Ø1584 (1576.79-1603.85) Points
MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG Intel Core Ultra 7 255H: Ø2596 (2544.21-2610.8) Points
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Intel Core Ultra 5 225H: Ø2342 (2293.31-2626.4) Points
HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350: Ø2376 (2309.87-2407.9) Points
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 -1! | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 -1! | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI -1! | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG -1! | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H -1! | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA -1! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (28416 - 33700, n=3) | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (117109 - 138581, n=3) | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (4824 - 5450, n=3) | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (17621 - 18605, n=3) | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (62125 - 71733, n=3) | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (98035 - 110544, n=3) | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (1174 - 1397, n=3) | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (14799 - 17629, n=3) | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (48728 - 52444, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (6848 - 7502, n=3) | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
系统性能
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Quantized GPU 1.7 | Half Precision GPU 1.7 | Single Precision GPU 1.7
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Quantized GPU 1.7 | Half Precision GPU 1.7 | Single Precision GPU 1.7
| Performance rating | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, AMD Radeon 890M | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA -3! | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE -3! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, AMD Radeon 890M (8465 - 8665, n=2) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, AMD Radeon 890M (10475 - 11009, n=2) | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, AMD Radeon 890M (15768 - 16430, n=2) | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, AMD Radeon 890M (9762 - 9967, n=2) | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, AMD Radeon 890M (1739 - 1903, n=3) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, AMD Radeon 890M (1620 - 1729, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, AMD Radeon 890M (2024 - 2254, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, AMD Radeon 890M (1366 - 1526, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, AMD Radeon 890M (298 - 349, n=3) | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, AMD Radeon 890M (237 - 284, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, AMD Radeon 890M (426 - 431, n=3) | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Geekbench AI / Quantized GPU 1.7 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, AMD Radeon 890M (5297 - 5656, n=2) | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Geekbench AI / Half Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, AMD Radeon 890M (11589 - 11832, n=2) | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Geekbench AI / Single Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, AMD Radeon 890M (6931 - 7225, n=2) | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8665 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (70163 - 82931, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (80270 - 86838, n=3) | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (85093 - 109384, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (100.1 - 118.5, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
SanDisk PC SN5100S
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6749 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
6683 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
693.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
549.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
4745 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
4311 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
82.39 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
156.7 MB/s
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 SanDisk PC SN5100S; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7051 (6192.26-7076.84) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE Samsung PM9C1b MZVL8512HFLU-00BLL; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4669 (4117.49-4849.24) MB/s
GPU性能
| 性能概况 | 图形性能评分 | 物理性能得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式 | 8227 | 27893 | 2187 |
| 平衡模式 | 6746 (-18%) | 27923 (-0%) | 2120 (-0%) |
| 电池电量 | 6666 (-19%) | 27029 (-3%) | 2159 (-0%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13861 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 35749 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7029 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3345 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Strange Brigade | Cyberpunk 2077 | F1 24
《赛博朋克2077》极高画质帧率图表
Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Radeon 890M: Ø26.9 (25-27.4) fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE R5 PRO 215, Radeon 740M: Ø9.12 (8.14-9.29) fps
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 167.5 | 71.3 | 30.1 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 174.1 | 129.5 | 89.3 | 79.6 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 80 | 40.9 | 29.4 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 72.6 | 59.3 | 43.5 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 168.2 | 63.8 | 54 | 47.9 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 47.3 | 38.5 | 31.6 | 31.1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 46.9 | 37.7 | 29 | 25.3 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 84.2 | 75.9 | 56.7 | 15.1 |
排放
系统噪音
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23.2 / 23.2 / 27 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 34.1 / 46.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) | ||
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Radeon 890M | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE R5 PRO 215, Radeon 740M | MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 7% | -0% | 11% | -5% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23 | 23.3 -1% | 24.6 -7% | 22.9 -0% | 23.2 -1% | 22.7 1% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.2 | 23.4 -1% | 24.6 -6% | 23.1 -0% | 23.2 -0% | 22.8 2% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 23.2 | 23.4 -1% | 24.6 -6% | 23.1 -0% | 23.2 -0% | 22.8 2% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 27 | 25.8 4% | 26.4 2% | 24.1 11% | 23.2 14% | 24.7 9% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 34.1 | 38 -11% | 28.6 16% | 45.2 -33% | 26.3 23% | 46 -35% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 46.5 | 38.1 18% | 34.2 26% | 39.4 15% | 35.4 24% | 48.7 -5% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 46.7 | 48.6 -4% | 34.2 27% | 44.7 4% | 38.8 17% | 49.5 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.5 °C / 81.5 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.5 °C / 81.5 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Radeon 890M | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE R5 PRO 215, Radeon 740M | MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 9% | 7% | -0% | -2% | 6% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 41 | 40.6 1% | 37 10% | 35 15% | 40.7 1% | 38 7% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 39.2 | 39.8 -2% | 40.9 -4% | 37.4 5% | 47.8 -22% | 33.4 15% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 28.4 | 23.2 18% | 24.9 12% | 30.2 -6% | 26 8% | 28 1% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 28.6 | 23.8 17% | 26.4 8% | 33 -15% | 27 6% | 28.2 1% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力测试时，CPU 频率会升至 3 GHz，功耗达到 43 W；几秒钟后，频率会下降并稳定在 2.8 GHz，功耗为 33 W，温度为 62 摄氏度。
| 平均 CPU 时钟频率 (GHz) | GPU 时钟频率 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | |
| 系统空闲 | -- | 756 | 33 |
| Prime95 压力测试 | 2.8 | -- | 62 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力测试 | 3.0 | 1153 | 62 |
| 《赛博朋克2077》压力测试 | 0.5 | 2590 | 59 |
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功耗
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.26 / 2.7 Watt |
| Idle | 5.4 / 10.1 / 10.3 Watt |
| Load |
55.8 / 69.2 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Radeon 890M, SanDisk PC SN5100S, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, , OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE R5 PRO 215, Radeon 740M, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL8512HFLU-00BLL, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T, , IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M, Micron 3500 MTFDKBA512TGD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 8% | 21% | 3% | 10% | 10% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 5.4 | 4 26% | 3.7 31% | 5.9 -9% | 4.7 13% | 2.9 46% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 10.1 | 4.4 56% | 7.4 27% | 9 11% | 9.7 4% | 6.5 36% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 10.3 | 10.2 1% | 8.1 21% | 9.7 6% | 10.1 2% | 6.7 35% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 55.8 | 44.2 21% | 40.8 27% | 54.9 2% | 44.2 21% | 65.6 -18% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 61.6 | 62.6 -2% | 45.1 27% | 57.3 7% | 50.3 18% | 65.8 -7% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 58.6 | 62.4 -6% | 43.7 25% | 54.2 8% | 50.9 13% | 62.8 -7% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 69.2 | 94.6 -37% | 78.9 -14% | 72.3 -4% | 69.6 -1% | 80.6 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克 / 压力测试
Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Radeon 890M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø65.1 (63-69.2) Watt
Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø57.8 (52.8-70.8) Watt
Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Radeon 890M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø6.29 (5.99-7.75) Watt
Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.37 (3.19-4.12) Watt
Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Radeon 890M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø61.6 (60.4-64.1) Watt
Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø52.7 (51.7-58) Watt
外接显示器的功耗
Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Radeon 890M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø58.8 (56.3-69.3) Watt
Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø58.1 (52.5-70.8) Watt
Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Radeon 890M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø55.7 (51-60) Watt
Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø70.8 (70.6-70.8) Watt
Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Radeon 890M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø52 (42.7-60.2) Watt
Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø68.1 (65-70.8) Watt
Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Radeon 890M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø58.4 (56.1-66.7) Watt
Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø48 (44.3-49.8) Watt
Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Radeon 890M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.47 (5.17-6.32) Watt
Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.72 (3.53-4.46) Watt
Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Radeon 890M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø58.6 (57.4-61.2) Watt
Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø40.6 (35.7-44.8) Watt
电池续航时间
| Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Radeon 890M, 70 Wh | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 70 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE R5 PRO 215, Radeon 740M, 75 Wh | MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T, 55.2 Wh | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T, 50 Wh | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M, 77 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | ||||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 12.5 | 10.3 -18% | 15.8 26% | 7 -44% | 8.9 -29% | 13.3 6% |
Notebookcheck 评分
一款传统且低调的商用翻盖式笔记本，配备可拆卸内存、可选广域网接口以及丰富的集成端口。
Dell Pro 5 16 P516265
- 07/24/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
Office - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 83.4%  | Dell Pro 5 16 P516265 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 4500 USD | 2 kg | 18.95 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
2. 87.2%  | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $1,977.99 Dell Premium 16 (Previously ... 2. $2,399.99 Dell Premium 16 (Previously ... 3. $2,595.99 Dell Premium 16 (XPS 16 2025... List Price: 2350 USD | 1.7 kg | 14.62 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED |
3. 86.9%  | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,249.99 Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 La... 2. $1,299.95 Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 Bu... 3. $1,789.99 Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 Co... List Price: 1640€ | 1.9 kg | 18.2 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
4. 80.7%  | MSI Venture 16 AI A2HMTG Intel Core Ultra 7 255H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 1000 USD | 2.1 kg | 23.15 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
5. 84.4%  | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Intel Core Ultra 5 225H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130T ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1300€ | 1.7 kg | 18 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
6. 87%  | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 4400 USD | 1.9 kg | 15.5 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
