结论——高端外观，无需高端价格
选择一款价格低廉的 Windows 笔记本电脑，往往意味着要做出巨大的妥协，包括不吸引人的设计和较差的显示屏。新款 XPS 13 直接解决了这些问题，轻松跻身 1000 美元以下价位段中外观最出色的 13 英寸 Windows 笔记本电脑之列。 这款机型在质感和外观上都显得比实际价格更高端，轻松超越了惠普 Pavilion 或联想 IdeaPad 3/5 等直接竞争对手——这些产品的设计往往显得像是为了衬托其更具吸引力且价格更高的机型而仓促添加的。 戴尔这款笔记本的显示屏同样令人惊喜——在700美元以下的价位段，你很难在其他笔记本上找到如此高品质的2.5K触控屏，且支持全P3色域。
Pros
+ 轻巧且外观吸引人，尤其是以这个价格而言
+ 配备出色的 120 Hz 触控屏，支持 P3 色域
+ 支持 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 6 标准
+ 电池续航时间长；能效高
+ 价格实惠，远低于 1000 美元
Cons
- 8 GB 单通道、不可升级的内存限制了其多功能性
- 机身比旧款 XPS 13 设计更易碎
- 黑白响应时间相对较慢
- 图形性能非常有限
- 空格键按下去时感觉有些松软
$1,399.99
Dell XPS 14 Premium Laptop DA14250-14.5-inch Touch 3.2K OLED 48-120Hz Display, Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics, 32GB Memory, 1TB SSD, Backlit English Keyboard with Fingerprint Reader
与XPS 14和XPS 16不同，2026款XPS 13经过了彻底重新设计，起售价大幅降低至仅699美元，若享受教育折扣甚至低至599美元。 这一举措尤为引人注目，因为XPS系列一直以价格较高的专业级消费机型著称，其零售价通常是此款的2倍或3倍。
我们测试的机型是基础配置，搭载英特尔Wildcat Core 5 320处理器和8 GB焊接内存。 将内存容量翻倍会使价格增加200美元，但目前所有型号均配备单通道内存，并采用相同的120 Hz 2560 x 1600 IPS触控屏。预计未来配置中将推出更快的Core Ultra 7 355处理器选项。
英特尔 Wildcat XPS 13 的设计初衷是作为广受欢迎的 MacBook Neo 的 Windows 替代品。其他竞争对手还包括面向预算用户的机型，如联想 IdeaPad 3 系列、惠普 Pavilion 系列，以及其他售价低于 1000 美元的经济型笔记本电脑。
更多戴尔评测：
规格
Dell XPS 13 DX13260
Processor
Intel Core 5 320 6c/6t, 2 x 4.6 GHz Intel Cougar Cove P-Core, 4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Darkmont LP E-Core, 37 W PL2 / Short Burst, 18 W PL1 / Sustained, Wildcat Lake
Graphics adapter
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU, Core: 2500 MHz, LPDDR5x, 32.0.101.8801
Memory
8 GB
, LPDDR5x-7467, Single-Channel, Soldered
Display
13.40 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 225 PPI, 10-point capacitive, LG Philips LP134WQ, IPS, Dell P/N: RNYV4, glossy: no, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Wildcat Lake-U PCH
Weight
1.062 kg, Power Supply: 166 g
Price
700 USD
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
案例
2026款XPS 13比2024款XPS 13更加轻薄。合上盖子时，它看起来就像是近期重新设计的XPS 16的缩小版。 不过，较早款且较重的 XPS 13 机型比这一最新版本更不易发生弯曲，因此可以说，机身尺寸和重量的缩减确实影响了其刚性。
连接性
配备Core Ultra处理器的SKU支持40 Gbps的Thunderbolt 4，而低端非Ultra Core处理器的SKU仅支持10 Gbps的USB-C 3.2。
沟通
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Dell XPS 13 DX13260; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1498 (1435-1602) MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 DX13260; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1500 (1399-1613) MBit/s
网络摄像头
虽然该设备标配了支持 Windows Hello 的红外（IR）功能，但目前仍未配备任何形式的隐私遮光板（无论是物理的还是其他形式的）。
11 ∆E
13 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
15 ∆E
15 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
维护
可持续发展
该笔记本电脑机身采用最高75%的再生铝制成顶盖和掌托，电池中最高含有50%的再生钴，键帽中最高含有90%的再生钢。包装完全可回收，且不含塑料。
输入设备
可以说，相比更大尺寸的XPS 14所采用的零网格键盘，传统键盘的输入体验更为轻松。不过，虽然按键反馈清晰，但按键行程非常浅，尤其是空格键。
显示
尽管整体价格较低，戴尔在触摸屏上并未吝啬。事实上，这是所有售价远低于1000美元的13英寸超便携笔记本中，显示效果最佳的屏幕之一。 色彩经过校准，P3色域覆盖率超过95%，色彩鲜艳；对比度约为2000:1，对于IPS面板而言相当高；亮度超过500尼特，表现出色。其对HDR支持较弱以及黑白响应时间较慢，对于目标用户群体——办公用户和学生——而言影响不大。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Philips LP134WQ tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 539.3 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 502.8 cd/m² Minimum: 0.64 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 539.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 2157:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}
calibrated: 0.92
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}
87.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
98.2% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
CCT: 6727 K
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 LG Philips LP134WQ, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4", 120 Hz | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H LG Philips 140WT2, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Dell XPS 13 9350 LG Philips 134WU2, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4", 120 Hz | Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB IPS, 2408x1506, 13", 60 Hz | HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr LG Philips LGD0746, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE B140UAX01.1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 5% | -18% | -15% | -19% | -16% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 98.2 | 99.7 2% | 67.3 -31% | 72.2 -26% | 66.5 -32% | 69.8 -29% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 100 0% | 99 -1% | 97.9 -2% | 96.8 -3% | 99.1 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 87.6 | 98.2 12% | 68.6 -22% | 72.6 -17% | 67.3 -23% | 72 -18% |
| Response Times | 98% | 25% | 58% | 13% | 33% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 51.2 ? | 0.75 ? 99% | 37.3 ? 27% | 20.8 ? 59% | 44.7 ? 13% | 42 ? 18% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 33.6 ? | 1.03 ? 97% | 25.9 ? 23% | 14.6 ? 57% | 29.7 ? 12% | 17.7 ? 47% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 240.62 ? | |||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 29 | |||||
| Screen | -9% | 6% | -14% | -94% | -122% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 539.3 | 393.8 -27% | 462.8 -14% | 548 2% | 442 -18% | 540 0% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 503 | 389 -23% | 435 -14% | 519 3% | 420 -17% | 524 4% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 89 | 96 8% | 87 -2% | 91 2% | 88 -1% | 93 4% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.25 | 0.19 24% | 0.48 -92% | 0.3 -20% | 0.3 -20% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 2157 | 2436 13% | 1142 -47% | 1473 -32% | 1800 -17% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.27 -6% | 1.92 -60% | 1.4 -17% | 4.34 -262% | 5 -317% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.63 | 3.35 8% | 3.45 5% | 3.1 15% | 9.71 -167% | 12.2 -236% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.92 | 0.71 23% | 0.48 48% | 0.4 57% | 0.58 37% | 1.1 -20% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 2 -43% | 0.6 57% | 2.1 -50% | 6.5 -364% | 8.3 -493% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.13 103% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6727 97% | 6379 102% | 6539 99% | 6870 95% | 7466 87% | 7068 92% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 31% /
13% | 4% /
4% | 10% /
-4% | -33% /
-63% | -35% /
-77% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 51.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (30.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7735 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前，我们按照制造商的建议将 Windows 设置为“平衡”模式。
处理器性能
Core 5 320 的原始多线程性能仅比五年前的 Core i7-1185G7 略快一些。对于需要处理更繁重多任务的用户而言，升级至 Core Ultra 7 355 或许值得考虑，因为这将使多线程性能显著提升 80% 以上。
Cinebench R15 多核循环测试
Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Intel Core 5 320: Ø940 (856.35-1053.52) Points
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Core Ultra X7 358H: Ø2340 (2099.85-3134.55) Points
Dell XPS 13 9350 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V: Ø1415 (1369.16-1569.86) Points
HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr AMD Ryzen AI 7 350: Ø1989 (1917.36-2037.7) Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE Intel Core Ultra 5 325: Ø1617 (1603.78-1670.43) Points
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr -1! | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE -1! | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 -1! | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 -1! | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320 -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320 (n=1) | |
系统性能
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB -4! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6159 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 320 (n=1) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
7107 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
4462 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
467.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
359.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
3262 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
3536 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
59.62 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
116.7 MB/s
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
Dell XPS 13 DX13260 ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6973 (5927.07-7011.62) MB/s
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7012 (6080.06-7044.75) MB/s
GPU性能
集成显卡 Graphics 2 Xe3 的性能略逊于 2020 年初大多数超极本上广泛采用的 Iris Xe 96 EUs。毋庸置疑，它更多是针对 4K 视频播放而非实际游戏或图形加速而设计的。
在某些设置下，包括《F1 24》、《奇异旅团》和《赛博朋克2077》在内的部分游戏可能无法启动，这很可能是由于内存限制过严所致。因此，下文未包含这些游戏的数据集。
| 功耗配置文件 | 图形性能得分 | 物理性能得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式 | 3485 | 14951 | 1289 |
| 平衡模式 | 3410 | 15226 | 1283 |
| 电池电量 | 3384 | 15116 | 1270 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4261 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 17969 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3302 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1513 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB -4! | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 | |
GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Baldur's Gate 3 | Cyberpunk 2077
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 116.8 | 101 | 21.5 | 7.71 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 79.2 | 43.7 | 45.3 | 45.7 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 37.2 | 18.7 | 18.7 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 23.5 | 23.6 | 20.4 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 95.1 | 38.6 | 30.5 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 15.4 | 12.6 | 10.9 | 10.9 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 18.7 | 14.3 |
排放
系统噪音
该系统的运行噪音比上一代 XPS 13 机型更小，这与 Wildcat 处理器的整体性能较低相吻合。只有在运行超出网页浏览或视频流媒体等常规任务的更耗资源的负载时，风扇噪音才会变得明显。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23.3 / 23.3 / 23.3 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 27.7 / 40.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.3 dB(A) | ||
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Dell XPS 13 9350 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V | Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB A18 Pro, A18 GPU | HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -8% | -3% | 6% | -10% | ||
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.3 | 22.9 2% | 24.1 -3% | 23.2 -0% | 24.8 -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.3 | 23.3 -0% | 24.4 -5% | 23.3 -0% | 24.8 -6% | |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 23.3 | 23.3 -0% | 24.4 -5% | 23.3 -0% | 24.8 -6% | |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 23.3 | 23.3 -0% | 24.4 -5% | 23.3 -0% | 24.8 -6% | |
| Load Average * (dB) | 27.7 | 34 -23% | 26.2 5% | 24.7 11% | 38.9 -40% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 35.6 | 43.5 -22% | 34.2 4% | 23.5 34% | 38.9 -9% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 40.7 | 45.7 -12% | 45.2 -11% | 42 -3% | 38.9 4% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-1.8 °C / -3.2 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-1.8 °C / -3.2 F).
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Dell XPS 13 9350 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V | Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB A18 Pro, A18 GPU | HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 5% | 4% | 4% | 6% | -2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 39 | 34 13% | 34.8 11% | 40.8 -5% | 35.8 8% | 40.7 -4% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 38.2 | 35.8 6% | 37.4 2% | 38 1% | 37.6 2% | 42.8 -12% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 26 | 25.6 2% | 25.4 2% | 23.8 8% | 24.2 7% | 24.9 4% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 26.2 | 26.4 -1% | 26.2 -0% | 22.8 13% | 24 8% | 25 5% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力测试时，CPU 频率会提升至 3.6 GHz，功耗达到 35 W，随后温度迅速攀升至 100 摄氏度。此时，为了将核心温度维持在更易控的 89 摄氏度，性能会迅速降至 2.6 GHz，功耗降至 18 W。 在运行高负载任务时，核心温度可能相当高，导致表面温度明显升高。
| 平均 CPU 时钟频率 (GHz) | GPU 时钟频率 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) 系统空闲 | |
| -- | |||
| 1000 | |||
| 34 | |||
| Prime95 压力测试 | |||
| 2.6 | |||
| -- | |||
| 89 | |||
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力测试 | |||
| 2.4 | |||
| 1800 - 2500 | |||
| 79 | |||
| 《赛博朋克2077》压力测试 | |||
| ~1.7 | |||
| 2500 | |||
| 82 |
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell XPS 13 DX13260 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功耗
在最低和最高亮度设置下，功耗分别低至 2 W 和 5 W，能效极高。因此，尽管电池容量处于平均水平，其续航时间却非常长，实际网页浏览时间超过 18 小时。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.03 / 0.56 Watt |
| Idle | 1.9 / 5.4 / 5.8 Watt |
| Load |
20.6 / 52 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL, , IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4" | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9350 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, Micron 2550 512GB, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB A18 Pro, A18 GPU, Apple SSD AP0256Z, IPS, 2408x1506, 13" | HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL8512HFLU-00BLL, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -59% | -10% | 13% | -53% | -22% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.9 | 3.1 -63% | 1.3 32% | 1.5 21% | 3.2 -68% | 1.6 16% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 5.4 | 3.6 33% | 2.5 54% | 8.9 -65% | 6.8 -26% | 4.6 15% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 5.8 | 10 -72% | 4.1 29% | 9 -55% | 7 -21% | 4.9 16% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 20.6 | 39.2 -90% | 40.1 -95% | 18.9 8% | 50.3 -144% | 39.7 -93% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 33.6 | 51.4 -53% | 46.1 -37% | 11.5 66% | 52.8 -57% | 45.2 -35% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 30.1 | 51.2 -70% | 43.1 -43% | 10.3 66% | 41.6 -38% | 46.1 -53% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 52 | 101.4 -95% | 57.3 -10% | 26.3 49% | 59.9 -15% | 64.2 -23% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克 / 压力测试
Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø41.5 (36.3-52.6) Watt
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø57.8 (46.6-101.4) Watt
Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.49 (2.36-3.57) Watt
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.26 (2.28-5.65) Watt
Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø33.6 (31.8-41.2) Watt
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø51.4 (48.7-57.4) Watt
外接显示器的功耗
Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø38.6 (33.5-48.1) Watt
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø56.8 (46.6-99.1) Watt
Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø40 (38.8-42.3) Watt
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø93.9 (89.5-96.9) Watt
Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø36.8 (34.1-46.4) Watt
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø71 (41.1-94.8) Watt
Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø16.8 (15.9-17.6) Watt
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø58.2 (42.2-74.1) Watt
Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø2.08 (1.816-5.48) Watt
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.43 (1.646-5.16) Watt
Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø30.1 (28.8-41.9) Watt
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø51.2 (30.8-56.9) Watt
电池续航时间
| Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Core 5 320, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL, 52 Wh | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 70 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9350 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 55 Wh | Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB A18 Pro, A18 GPU, 36.5 Wh | HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 43 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 58 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -9% | 12% | -30% | -43% | 26% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 18.4 | 16.8 -9% | 20.6 12% | 12.9 -30% | 10.4 -43% | 23.2 26% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 56.8 | |||||
| Load (h) | 2.4 | 2.8 | ||||
| H.264 (h) | 13.6 |
Notebookcheck 评分
搭载英特尔Wildcat处理器的XPS 13，彻底颠覆了用户对廉价Windows笔记本电脑的固有印象。
Dell XPS 13 DX13260
- 08/12/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 85.7%  | Dell XPS 13 DX13260 Intel Core 5 320 ⎘ Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 700 USD | 1.1 kg | 12.7 mm | 13.40" 2560x1600 225 PPI IPS |
2. 87.4%  | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,399.99 Dell XPS 14 Premium Laptop D... 2. $2,049.00 Dell XPS 14 9440 14.5" Noteb... 3. $1,955.00 Dell Pro 14 Plus Business La... List Price: 2200 USD | 1.4 kg | 14.62 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
3. 85.3%  | Dell XPS 13 9350 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1400 USD | 1.2 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.40" 1920x1200 169 PPI IPS |
4. 86%  | Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB Apple A18 Pro ⎘ Apple A18 GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 699€ | 1.2 kg | 12.7 mm | 13.00" 2408x1506 218 PPI IPS |
5. 86.9%  | HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1250 USD | 1 kg | 17.6 mm | 13.30" 1920x1200 170 PPI IPS |
6. 89.9%  | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE Intel Core Ultra 5 325 ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,899.00 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Ge... 2. $2,199.99 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Bu... 3. $1,929.74 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Ge... List Price: 2469€ | 1.1 kg | 16.8 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
