评语：ThinkPad L16 G2 在办公桌上表现出色，但在外出时却不尽如人意
如果您正在寻找一款配备 16 英寸屏幕、价格实惠的工作主力机型，联想 ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 AMD 应该是您的首选。它拥有出色的输入设备，维修和升级能力强，端口选择丰富，而且运行凉爽、安静。无论是我们测试的基本 Zen4 配置，还是更昂贵的 Zen5 配置，其性能都足以胜任办公任务。这款联想 ThinkPad L16 G2 的起售价约为 1,000 欧元，相当实惠。
ThinkPad 笔记本电脑在两个方面存在缺陷：屏幕和电池续航时间。电池续航时间低于办公笔记本电脑的平均水平，而屏幕对于办公用途来说基本上还可以，尤其是在色彩质量方面有所欠缺。这两个因素使得联想 ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 更适合作为办公桌上的笔记本电脑，大部分时间都需要外接屏幕和电源，电池和内置屏幕只能偶尔使用。
Pros
+ 极易维修和升级
+ 32 GB 内存，价格相对较低
+ 良好的输入设备
+ 多种端口选择，多种安全功能
+ 凉爽安静
Cons
- 电池寿命低于平均水平
- 屏幕色彩质量欠佳
- 没有更好的屏幕可供选择
- 塑料外壳感觉有点廉价
Amazon
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC - AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 215/3.2 GHz - Win 11 Pro - Radeon 740M - 16 GB RA
对于消费者来说，工作用笔记本电脑可能不是最令人兴奋的，但对于个人电脑制造商来说，它们却是最可靠的畅销产品。对于联想来说，ThinkPad L 系列无疑是最畅销的产品之一，因为这个经济实惠的企业级产品线吸引了大量的企业客户。联想 ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 是 L 系列中最大的机型，配备 16 英寸屏幕，有 AMD 和英特尔两种型号，我们测试的是 AMD 型号。
规格Ryzen 5 Pro 215 首次亮相
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE
Processor
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, 2 x 4.7 GHz AMD Zen 4, 4 x 3.6 GHz AMD Zen 4c, 30 W PL2 / Short Burst, 22 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c)
Graphics adapter
Memory
32 GB
, DDR5-5600, 2x SO-DIMM, Dual Channel
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 142 PPI, N160JCA-EEM, LED IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Kioxia BG6 KBG6AZNV512G, 512 GB
, M.2 2280, NVMe PCIe 4.0, 397 GB free
Weight
1.948 kg, Power Supply: 299 g
Price
1090 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
外壳与连接：黑色塑料和 USB 2.0，以降低价格
联想笔记本电脑采用了典型的方正黑色 ThinkPad 设计，以适应较低的价格档次。在这种情况下，采用了较厚的塑料外壳，虽然仍然坚固耐用，但制造成本较低。联想 ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 AMD 使用的塑料除了粗糙的塑料屏幕边框和底盖外，大部分都很光滑。虽然这会让人感觉有点廉价，但无论如何，16 英寸的 L 系列变体都是要放在桌面上的。笔记本电脑的铰链能牢牢固定屏幕，并能实现 180 度打开，但单手无法掀开盖子。
联想为 ThinkPad 提供了丰富的端口选择，包括传统端口和现代端口。与众不同的是，联想 ThinkPad L16 G2 有三个 USB-A 端口，不过遗憾的是其中一个仅限于 USB 2.0。ThinkPad 笔记本电脑真正缺少的唯一端口是 SD 读卡器。
作为一款商务设备，联想为 ThinkPad L16 提供了两个 SO-DIMM 插槽和一个 M.2 2280 固态硬盘，使其相当容易拆卸和升级。此外，用户还可以轻松更换键盘。它还可以进行 4G 升级。
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1473 (1116-1649)
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1766 (1745-1796)
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1213 (668-1512)
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1677 (1632-1705)
30.6 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
20 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
27 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
19 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
输入设备：ThinkPad 笔记本电脑没有让人失望
与所有 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑一样，键盘是联想 ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 AMD 的强项。键盘布局合理，数字键盘可用于数字运算，打字手感良好。同样，ThinkPad 笔记本电脑也有很好的鼠标输入设备，有一个很好的触摸板和出色的 ThinkPad TrackPoint（ThinkPad 品牌的标志性指点杆）。
显示屏ThinkPad L16 2 代 AMD 的一个弱点
联想只为联想 ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 AMD 提供了基本的屏幕选择--16 英寸 WUXGA IPS 雾面屏，色域为 45% NTSC，亮度为 400 cd/m²。唯一的选择是配备触摸功能的面板。
与前代 ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 所使用的屏幕相比，该面板有所改进，亮度从平均 322 cd/m² 提高到 424 cd/m²。不过，这并不是一块好面板，色彩准确度和色域较差就说明了这一点。当然，这不是一款你想用来看电影或编辑图片的屏幕，但对于简单的办公工作来说，它已经足够好了。该屏幕没有 PWM，由于采用了磨砂表面和足够的亮度，因此可以提供基本的户外可视性。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
N160JCA-EEM tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 449 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 424.2 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 440 cd/m²
Contrast: 1760:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 6.8 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
calibrated: 5.8
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
37.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
52.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
35.7% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
CCT: 5985 K
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE N160JCA-EEM, LED IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE MNG007QS1-3, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 N160JCA-GT1, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE LEN160WUXGA , IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 11% | 89% | 84% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 35.7 | 39.5 11% | 68.5 92% | 65.9 85% | |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 52.9 | 58.7 11% | 98.6 86% | 97.2 84% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 37.1 | 40.8 10% | 70.4 90% | 68 83% | |
| Response Times | 45% | -13% | 38% | 28% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 57.4 ? | 24.6 ? 57% | 50.2 ? 13% | 35.3 ? 39% | 27 ? 53% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 22.1 ? | 15 ? 32% | 30.7 ? -39% | 14.2 ? 36% | 21.6 ? 2% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | |||||
| Screen | 1% | 24% | 20% | -2% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 440 | 334 -24% | 439.2 0% | 489 11% | 315 -28% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 424 | 322 -24% | 405 -4% | 469 11% | 298 -30% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 86 | 89 3% | 88 2% | 90 5% | 91 6% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.25 | 0.3 -20% | 0.31 -24% | 0.26 -4% | 0.17 32% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1760 | 1113 -37% | 1417 -19% | 1881 7% | 1853 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 5.4 21% | 2.2 68% | 4.3 37% | 6.5 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 25.6 | 19.6 23% | 4.31 83% | 7 73% | 26.5 -4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.8 | 4.9 16% | 0.49 92% | 0.9 84% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 2 50% | 3.2 20% | 5.8 -45% | 4.1 -2% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.15 102% | 2.3 96% | 2.61 84% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 5985 109% | 6283 103% | 6438 101% | 6195 105% | 6064 107% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 19% /
9% | 33% /
33% | 47% /
36% | 13% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 57.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8013 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能Ryzen 5 CPU 和 32GB 内存
联想 ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 没有像其前代产品那样采用较老的 Zen3+ CPU，而是提供了多种 Zen4 和 Zen5 CPU 可供选择，最高可达到 AMD Ryzen AI 7 Pro 350。由于联想纯粹依靠 CPU 的 iGPU，因此不提供 dGPU。由于有两个 DDR5-5600 SO-DIMM 插槽，内存最高可配置为 64 GB。单个 M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD 负责存储。
测试条件
影响 CPU 功耗的三种电源模式如下：
- 最佳电池寿命：PL1 10 W / PL2 10 W
- 平衡模式PL1 14 瓦 / PL2 17.5 瓦
- 最佳性能PL1 22 瓦 / PL2 30 瓦
处理器
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 215 是一款采用 SMT 技术的六核 CPU，拥有 12 个线程。这款 Zen4 "鹰点 "芯片是该系列中最弱的六核 CPU，主频为 3.2 至 4.7 GHz。与众不同的是，它没有任何 NPU。进一步的基准比较可参考我们的 CPU 基准测试列表.
就性能而言，ThinkPad 的整体排名略高于其上一代产品，尽管这只是一个六核版本，而 ThinkPad L16 G1我们测试的是八核心的 Ryzen 7。它不是一款速度很快的 CPU，但足以满足办公室的日常使用。
使用电池运行时，性能下降了约 8%，在 Cinebench R23 多核测试中仅为 9273 分。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215: Ø1462 (1402.28-1617.27)
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U: Ø1555 (1518.55-1752.08)
HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350: Ø2376 (2309.87-2407.9)
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350: Ø2090 (2054.86-2438.88)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100: Ø1505 (1473.3-1556.24)
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE -1! | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Average of class Office (1577 - 22808, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (708 - 2130, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Average of class Office (590 - 8840, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (285 - 816, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average of class Office (246 - 3380, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (99.5 - 312, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average of class Office (158 - 1956, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (7532 - 76886, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Average of class Office (3046 - 6469, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (757 - 17846, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average of class Office (462 - 2894, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average of class Office (1719 - 16999, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (811 - 2128, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (1.72 - 26, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average of class Office (41.5 - 129.6, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Average of class Office (0.4098 - 1.06, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (1685 - 31245, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (8977 - 125394, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (590 - 5755, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (20636 - 115197, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (1064 - 18321, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (4415 - 66922, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (5127 - 155900, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Average of class Office (138.6 - 1366, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (859 - 17834, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (11090 - 65229, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
系统性能
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE -4! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Average of class Office (2823 - 9298, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Average of class Office (6567 - 11594, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Average of class Office (3041 - 17243, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Average of class Office (2049 - 13541, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (381 - 2010, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (464 - 1880, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Average of class Office (319 - 2361, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (360 - 1781, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Average of class Office (129.9 - 455, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Average of class Office (104.2 - 328, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (391 - 1297, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 5756 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (20075 - 110930, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average of class Office (10084 - 128030, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Average of class Office (20073 - 119858, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average of class Office (7.6 - 162.9, n=82, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
联想 ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 AMD 中的 Kioxia 512 GB M.2 2280 固态硬盘虽然速度不快，但绝对够快，不会让人感觉系统缓慢。它还能在持续负载下保持性能。
Kioxia BG6 KBG6AZNV512G
Sequential Read:
3691MB/s
Sequential Write:
2358MB/s
4K Read:
40.7MB/s
4K Write:
161MB/s
4K-64 Read:
675MB/s
4K-64 Write:
485MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.078ms
Access Time Write:
0.122ms
Copy ISO:
2891.71MB/s
Copy Program:
584.39MB/s
Copy Game:
1914.63MB/s
Score Read:
1085Points
Score Write:
882Points
Score Total:
2464Points
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2546 (2017.88-2585.16)
图形处理器性能
作为一款经济型笔记本电脑的经济型版本，图形性能并不是这款联想 ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 AMD 的强项。显卡 AMD Radeon 740M是一款性能较弱的 iGPU，只能用于非常基本的任务。只有非常老的游戏才能真正玩得转。当然，对于办公系统来说，这不是重点。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7301 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4311 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1722 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average of class Office (6.13 - 61.5, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Average of class Office (6.83 - 65.2, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average of class Office (12.9 - 142.1, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Average of class Office (10.9 - 92.6, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE R5 PRO 215, Radeon 740M: Ø11.5 (11-12.4)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 148.3 | 132.7 | 42.4 | 17.7 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 136.1 | 104.4 | 66.5 | 57.6 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 51.2 | 24.1 | 17.9 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 35.8 | 30.4 | 23.4 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 20.8 | 15.7 | 13.2 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 23.2 | 18.7 | ||
| F1 25 (2025) | 40.6 | 29.4 | 23.7 |
排放ThinkPad 大部分时间保持凉爽和安静
系统噪音
在风扇噪音方面，ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 AMD 是一款出色的商用笔记本电脑，因为几乎没有噪音。在负载情况下，单风扇确实会开启，但声音不大，最大为 38.4 dB(a)。
联想 ThinkPad L16 G2 不存在线圈啸叫的问题。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25.6 / 25.6 / 27.1 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 34.5 / 38.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.6 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE R5 PRO 215, Radeon 740M | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE R7 PRO 7735U, Radeon 680M | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | -7% | 2% | 5% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 25.6 | 25.2 2% | 22.7 11% | 26.3 -3% | 23.7 7% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25.6 | 25.2 2% | 22.8 11% | 26.3 -3% | 23.7 7% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25.6 | 25.2 2% | 22.8 11% | 26.3 -3% | 23.7 7% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 27.1 | 25.2 7% | 24.7 9% | 26.3 3% | 23.7 13% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 34.5 | 38.3 -11% | 46 -33% | 34.2 1% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 38.3 | 41.5 -8% | 48.7 -27% | 34.2 11% | 31.9 17% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 38.4 | 41.8 -9% | 49.5 -29% | 36.2 6% | 47.8 -24% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
即使在负载情况下，联想笔记本电脑的大部分机箱也几乎不会发热。在《赛博朋克 2077》测试中，最高温度为 119 华氏度或 48.6 摄氏度，这并不令人担忧，尤其是只有底部背面有一个发热点。
在组合 CPU 和 GPU 负载的情况下，也没有出现节流现象。
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 21 °C / 69.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.5 °C / 81.5 F (+6.5 °C / 11.7 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 21 °C / 69.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.5 °C / 81.5 F (+6.5 °C / 11.7 F).
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE R5 PRO 215, Radeon 740M | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE R7 PRO 7735U, Radeon 680M | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 3% | 8% | -3% | 11% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 37.3 | 38.6 -3% | 38 -2% | 44.4 -19% | 41.3 -11% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 44.5 | 45.7 -3% | 33.4 25% | 53.8 -21% | 32.7 27% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 28 | 25.6 9% | 28 -0% | 24.9 11% | 24.8 11% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 31.1 | 28.8 7% | 28.2 9% | 25.6 18% | 26 16% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
由于音量增大，ThinkPad L16 的底部扬声器今年有所改进。但低音效果仍然欠佳。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理：电池续航时间可以更长
耗电量
虽然联想 ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 AMD 并不耗电，但在我们的对比中，它并不是效率最高的机型之一。尤其是搭载 Zen5 的笔记本电脑在空转时的功耗更低，这表明选择 Zen5 也会让 L16 更高效。
ThinkPad 笔记本电脑充电器的最大功耗正好为 65 W，大小恰到好处。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.7 Watt |
| Idle | 4.1 / 8.5 / 9.1 Watt |
| Load |
44.9 / 65 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE R5 PRO 215, Radeon 740M, Kioxia BG6 KBG6AZNV512G, LED IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE R7 PRO 7735U, Radeon 680M, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X164N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M, Micron 3500 MTFDKBA512TGD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16" | Average AMD Radeon 740M | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -4% | -19% | -9% | 29% | 8% | 3% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 4.1 | 4.6 -12% | 2.9 29% | 3.1 24% | 2.2 46% | 4.75 ? -16% | 4.46 ? -9% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 8.5 | 8.2 4% | 6.5 24% | 8.4 1% | 6.5 24% | 6.83 ? 20% | 7.37 ? 13% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 9.1 | 8.9 2% | 6.7 26% | 9.1 -0% | 7.7 15% | 8.33 ? 8% | 8.62 ? 5% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 44.9 | 45.8 -2% | 65.6 -46% | 53.3 -19% | 40.6 ? 10% | 42.5 ? 5% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 37.5 | 42.4 -13% | 65.8 -75% | 48.6 -30% | 21 44% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 37.9 | 41.4 -9% | 62.8 -66% | 42.6 -12% | 19.9 47% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 65 | 65.5 -1% | 80.6 -24% | 83.9 -29% | 66.5 -2% | 54.5 ? 16% | 64.5 ? 1% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø49.2 (40.7-65)
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.85 (5.25-7.2)
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø37.5 (36.7-41.3)
外部显示器功耗
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø38 (37.5-42.5)
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø34 (29.2-35.2)
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø49.5 (39.4-56.6)
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø9.39 (8.74-10.6)
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø37.9 (37-38.8)
电池寿命
配备 AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 215 的 ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 AMD 的电池续航能力并不强。在电池容量为 57 Wh 的情况下，它的续航时间仅为 9 小时左右，甚至低于前代 ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 AMD。
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE R5 PRO 215, Radeon 740M, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE R7 PRO 7735U, Radeon 680M, 57 Wh | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M, 77 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M, 86 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, 84 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 69% | 46% | 88% | 196% | 36% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 9.1 | 11.2 23% | 13.3 46% | 17.1 88% | 26.9 196% | 12.7 ? 40% |
| Load (h) | 1.4 | 3 114% | 1.851 ? 32% | |||
| H.264 (h) | 10.9 | 15 ? |
笔记本检查评级
如果您的笔记本电脑主要放在家里或公司的办公桌上，那么联想 ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 AMD 就是一款不错的办公笔记本电脑。只是偶尔外出使用？如果是这样，当然有更好的选择，尽管 ThinkPad L 确实物有所值。
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE
- 02/20/2026 v8
Benjamin Herzig
Office - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 84.8%  | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1090 Euro | 1.9 kg | 25 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI LED IPS |
2. 84.8%  | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U ⎘ AMD Radeon 680M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1250€ | 1.9 kg | 25.2 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
3. 87%  | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 4400 USD | 1.9 kg | 15.5 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
4. 87.4%  | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 AM... 2. Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21... 3. ANTIEE L21M4P74 L21C4P72 Lap... List Price: 1349€ | 2 kg | 18.1 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
5. 82.6%  | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 960 Euro | 1.9 kg | 15.2 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS LED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
