结论 - ThinkPad E16 G3 是一款非常出色的办公笔记本电脑
新的第三代 ThinkPad E16 是一款非常出色的办公笔记本电脑,我们的评测没有发现任何真正的弱点,尤其是考虑到其低廉的价格。机身经过修改,现在完全由铝制成,这对厚度和重量都有积极影响。尽管与更昂贵的设备(如 ThinkPad T16等更昂贵的设备相比仍有差距。
英特尔机型使用的是 Arrow Lake 处理器,我们的机型提供了足够的 CPU 性能。另一方面,GPU 性能相当低,如果你打算在工作结束后玩一些游戏,你应该选择更快的 CPU 选项,其中包括更快的 iGPU。您还可以使用 Thunderbolt 4 和 Wi-Fi 7 模块。由于有两个内存和固态硬盘插槽,因此很容易扩展存储空间,可以升级到 128 GB 内存。
可选的 120 Hz WQHD 面板也具有良好的图像质量,绝对值得额外支付 70 欧元。电池续航时间比以前更好,整体表现非常出色。
我们的学生特别版在定价方面显然非常有趣,但联想在线商店的正常价格仍然非常公道,为 1050 欧元。即使你选择了更快的处理器和更大的内存,ThinkPad E16 G3 的价格仍然低于华硕 ExpertBook B5。 华硕专家本 B5例如
Pros
Cons
联想更新了其经济型办公笔记本电脑 ThinkPad E16,并为新的 G3 机型配备了改良机箱、英特尔现代箭湖处理器以及新的显示屏选项。我们的测试机是学生版,售价 899 欧元(含 Windows 11 Home),配备了 Core Ultra 5 225U、16 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘,以及 120 Hz 和 VRR 的全新 16 英寸 WQHD 屏幕。我们的评测配置从联想直接购买的正常价格为 1049 欧元。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
机箱 - 联想现在使用铝制机箱
典型的 ThinkPad 设计没有改变,摄像头凸起也依然存在,但联想为 ThinkPad E16 G3 配备了新的机箱。它不仅比以前更薄,而且更轻。机盖和底座都由铝合金制成,设备看起来很高档。不过,表面很快就会沾上指纹。
稳定性总体不错,只有键盘中心区域可以稍微向内推一些。不过,当我们试图扭转底座时,并没有发出嘎吱嘎吱的声音。盖子相当灵活,但没有出现图像失真的情况。铰链有点太轻,有一些晃动。总而言之,E16 G3 的性能还不错,但 ThinkPad T16 等更昂贵的机型在这方面更具优势。
所有对比设备的占地面积都非常相似,E16 G3 的重量也不重,仅为 1.7 千克。65 瓦电源适配器的重量为 307 克。
连接性 - ThinkPad E16 支持 Thunderbolt 4
新款 ThinkPad 的端口情况不错,有足够的 USB 端口,甚至还有一个 Thunderbolt 4 端口。我们的评测机没有配备 Wi-Fi 7 模块,但英特尔的 AX211 模块(Wi-Fi 6E)可提供不错的传输速率。根据规格表,还有 Wi-Fi 7 模块可供选择。此外,还有一个千兆以太网端口。1080p 网络摄像头可以完成工作,但质量不是很好。还有一个机械快门和一个用于面部识别的红外传感器。尽管这不是 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑,但该设备支持网络摄像头的工作室效果以及实时字幕。没有读卡器。
Networking | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |

维护
可持续性
ThinkPad E16 G3 提供多项环保认证(如能源之星 9.0 和 EPEAT Gold),联想宣传该设备的二氧化碳补偿量为 0.5 吨。不过,没有关于二氧化碳排放量或使用回收材料的信息。联想提供了维护手册,包装可以回收。
输入设备 - 良好的键盘
除了点击板,您还可以使用红色的 TrackPoint 和其他按钮。一旦习惯使用,TrackPoint 就能很好地工作,相应的按键也能提供均匀的反馈,不会发出咔哒声。由于使用了专用按键,点击板的尺寸受到了限制(11.5 x 6.7 厘米),而且偏向左侧。滑动性能良好,机械点击声音也不大。
显示屏 - WQHD,120 Hz 和 VRR
联想为 ThinkPad E16 G3 提供了两种不同的显示屏。除了亮度为 300 尼特(60 Hz,带触摸和不带触摸)的默认全高清屏幕外,您还可以额外付费 70 欧元获得亮度为 400 尼特、120 Hz、VRR 以及完全 sRGB 覆盖范围的 WQHD 面板(2560 x 1600 像素,16:10)。我们的评测设备配备了后者,主观图像质量非常好:内容清晰,色彩丰富,尽管表面是磨砂的,但即使是明亮的表面也不会有颗粒感。在黑色内容和最大亮度下会出现明显的混浊,但不会出现 PWM 闪烁,而且响应时间对于办公笔记本电脑来说出奇地快。虽然没有亮度传感器,但该面板仍能很好地完成生产任务。
中央最大亮度为 445 尼特(平均为 420 尼特),电池供电时也能达到这一亮度。黑色值为 0.33 cd/m²,最大对比度接近 1400:1。
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 446 cd/m²
Contrast: 1352:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
73.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 MNG007DAB-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA NE160QDM-NX4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 144 Hz | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | HP EliteBook 865 G10 InfoVision IVO3E94 (X160NV42 R0), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE MNG007QS1-3, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -4% | 25% | -40% | 2% | -44% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 71.3 | 68.5 -4% | 99.9 40% | 41.6 -42% | 72.8 2% | 39.4 -45% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.1 | 98.3 -1% | 100 1% | 61.2 -38% | 99.9 1% | 58.2 -41% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 73.5 | 69.4 -6% | 98 33% | 43 -41% | 75 2% | 40.7 -45% |
Response Times | -190% | 94% | -113% | -325% | -135% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12.6 ? | 35.6 ? -183% | 0.4 ? 97% | 18.4 ? -46% | 48 ? -281% | 23.7 ? -88% |
Response Time Black / White * | 5.9 ? | 17.5 ? -197% | 0.6 ? 90% | 16.5 ? -180% | 27.6 ? -368% | 16.6 ? -181% |
PWM Frequency | 120 ? | 550 | ||||
Screen | -48% | 3318% | -198% | -84% | -182% | |
Brightness middle | 446 | 413 -7% | 407 -9% | 321.2 -28% | 865 94% | 364 -18% |
Brightness | 420 | 408 -3% | 405 -4% | 319 -24% | 724 72% | 344 -18% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 94 4% | 98 9% | 92 2% | 47 -48% | 91 1% |
Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.2 39% | 0.001 100% | 0.37 -12% | 0.34 -3% | 0.25 24% |
Contrast | 1352 | 2065 53% | 407000 30004% | 868 -36% | 2544 88% | 1456 8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 3.6 -140% | 2.27 -51% | 8.7 -480% | 4.86 -224% | 6.7 -347% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.4 | 7.1 -196% | 4.46 -86% | 19.85 -727% | 11.58 -383% | 21.4 -792% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.3 | 1.5 -15% | 2.17 -67% | 1.82 -40% | 1.05 19% | 5.3 -308% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 4.6 -171% | 2.3 -35% | 9.2 -441% | 8 -371% | 4.9 -188% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.231 99% | 2.83 78% | 2.66 83% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6829 95% | 7461 87% | 6443 101% | 6200 105% | 6636 98% | 6010 108% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -81% /
-59% | 1146% /
2152% | -117% /
-152% | -136% /
-100% | -120% /
-146% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
5.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.4 ms rise | |
↘ 3.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
12.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 6.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8350 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - Arrow Lake,最高 128GB 内存
联想为 ThinkPad E16 G3 提供 AMD 或英特尔处理器。我们的英特尔 SKU 有不同的 Arrow Lake 处理器可供选择,我们的评测机配备的是 酷睿至尊 5 225U但您也可以选择 酷睿至尊 5 225H(+70欧元)或 酷睿至尊 7 255H(+220欧元)。由于有两个 SO-DIMM 插槽,您最多可以安装 128 GB 内存。不提供独立显卡。
审查设置
按照 ThinkPad 机型的惯例,联想的电源配置文件与 Windows 的电源设置直接相关。我们在最佳性能模式下进行了以下基准测试和测量。
处理器 - Core Ultra 5 225U
英特尔 酷睿至强 5 225U提供 2 个快速性能内核、8 个能效内核和 2 个低功耗能效内核。这样,总共有 12 个内核和 12 个线程。处理器的短时功耗可达 52 瓦,稳定在 35 瓦左右。CPU 性能足以胜任许多办公任务,而可选的 酷睿至尊 5 225H(我们最近在 ExpertBook B5 上测试过)在同等功耗限制下,速度要快约 25%。Core Ultra 7 255H 则更快。性能不会因电池电量不足而下降,更多 CPU 基准测试可在我们的 技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (1577 - 20399, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (618 - 2098, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (590 - 8086, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (229 - 807, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (246 - 3132, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (98 - 315, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average of class Office (163 - 1956, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (7532 - 76886, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6497, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (662 - 14990, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (457 - 2925, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 14192, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (510 - 2121, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Average of class Office (1.72 - 22.4, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average of class Office (41.1 - 129.6, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Average of class Office (0.4098 - 1.135, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (763 - 31245, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 125394, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (287 - 5398, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average of class Office (404 - 18321, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 66922, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1366, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (432 - 17834, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 55359, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
系统性能
ThinkPad 在日常使用中反应非常灵敏,我们在评测期间没有遇到任何问题。基准测试结果尚可,在实际使用中也不会注意到单通道内存配置。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV -4! | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7683, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (n=1) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (2049 - 11501, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1923, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (319 - 2169, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (n=1) | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (n=1) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (n=1) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Office (391 - 1966, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (n=1) | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6156 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 225U (n=1) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Average of class Office (7.6 - 185.2, n=81, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
ThinkPad E16 G3 提供两个 M.2 插槽,通过 PCIe 4.0 x4 连接。联想为该设备配备了一块紧凑型 M.2-2242 固态硬盘,我们使用的是 1 TB 版本的 SK Hynix PVC10(初始设置后赠送 895 GB)。固态硬盘的性能非常好,在持续工作负载下也很稳定。另外还有一个 M.2-2280 插槽,因此扩展存储容量非常容易,成本也很低。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
我们测试机的一个缺点是集成图形适配器,其名称为 Intel Graphics。它使用 4 个 Xe 内核,足以胜任标准的办公任务,但它是目前最慢的英特尔 iGPU。再加上单通道内存配置,GPU 的整体性能非常低。这显然也会影响游戏性能。如果你打算在工作之余玩一些游戏,你至少应该购买 酷睿至尊 5 225H,因为它配备了速度更快的 Arc Graphics 130T.后者的速度在 专家本 B5甚至 ThinkPad E16 G2 中的老式 Radeon 660M 也要快 25%。在持续工作负载下,GPU 性能稳定,但在游戏时,您几乎只能看到最低限度的细节,许多现代游戏根本无法流畅运行。流媒体服务可能是唯一的选择。电池电量不会降低性能。
3DMark 11 Performance | 5022 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3607 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1737 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
Average of class Office (296 - 1133, n=11, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (527 - 1156, n=22) | |
Average of class Office (245 - 3964, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (338 - 423, n=8) | |
Average of class Office (204 - 416, n=6, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Average of class Office (6.65 - 29.6, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
Average of class Office (3.98 - 47.8, n=73, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 97.9 | 84.8 | 19.7 | 7.73 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 95.3 | 80.9 | 37.8 | 49.9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 35 | 19.3 | 14.9 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 43.3 | 33.4 | 28.2 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 68.6 | 28.1 | 22.5 | 22.1 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 17.9 | 14.2 | 12.4 | 12.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 18.7 | 15.4 | 12.6 | 11.4 |
F1 24 (2024) | 34.2 | 30.3 | 23.5 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.6 / 24.6 / 24.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 30.8 / 40.5 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 225U, SK Hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X169N | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Arc 130T, Ultra 5 225H, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV Radeon 760M, R5 8640U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N | HP EliteBook 865 G10 Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE Radeon 660M, R5 7535HS, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 8% | -21% | 14% | 6% | 4% | |
off / environment * | 24.6 | 23.2 6% | 25 -2% | 23.1 6% | 23 7% | 24.6 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.6 | 23.2 6% | 26 -6% | 23.1 6% | 23 7% | 24.6 -0% |
Idle Average * | 24.6 | 23.2 6% | 29 -18% | 23.1 6% | 23 7% | 24.6 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.6 | 23.2 6% | 39 -59% | 23.1 6% | 23 7% | 24.6 -0% |
Load Average * | 30.8 | 26.3 15% | 45 -46% | 23.2 25% | 29.17 5% | 28.2 8% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 40.5 | 35.4 13% | 43 -6% | 29.2 28% | 36.3 10% | |
Load Maximum * | 40.5 | 38.8 4% | 45 -11% | 32.6 20% | 39.46 3% | 36.3 10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.91 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.9 °C / 82.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-0.3 °C / -0.5 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 Intel Core Ultra 5 225U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, AMD Radeon 660M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 3% | -14% | 14% | -11% | 7% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39.5 | 40.7 -3% | 48 -22% | 33.2 16% | 45 -14% | 42.6 -8% |
Maximum Bottom * | 48.6 | 47.8 2% | 60 -23% | 41.2 15% | 50 -3% | 43.3 11% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.3 | 26 5% | 28 -3% | 23.4 14% | 30 -10% | 24.1 12% |
Idle Bottom * | 29.1 | 27 7% | 31 -7% | 26.6 9% | 34 -17% | 24.9 14% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
好的扬声器通常不是办公笔记本电脑的必备条件,但 ThinkPad 的两个立体声模块(每个 2 瓦)却给我们带来了惊喜。是的,它们缺少一些低音和功率,但在其他方面质量不错,最大音量也足够大。
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.09 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 电池运行时间长
耗电量
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 Ultra 5 225U, Graphics 4-Core, SK Hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X169N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV R5 8640U, Radeon 760M, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE R5 7535HS, Radeon 660M, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -2% | -6% | 16% | -28% | 22% | 21% | 16% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.9 | 4.7 32% | 8 -16% | 4.3 38% | 5.2 25% | 3.6 48% | 3.87 ? 44% | 4.62 ? 33% |
Idle Average * | 11.1 | 9.7 13% | 10 10% | 8.9 20% | 12.8 -15% | 7.1 36% | 6.92 ? 38% | 7.57 ? 32% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.3 | 10.1 11% | 15 -33% | 9.1 19% | 14.1 -25% | 8.4 26% | 8.32 ? 26% | 9.04 ? 20% |
Load Average * | 37.3 | 44.2 -18% | 42 -13% | 31.7 15% | 65 -74% | 39 -5% | 40.1 ? -8% | 42.1 ? -13% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 41.6 | 50.3 -21% | 44.4 -7% | 39.4 5% | 36.6 12% | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 40 | 50.9 -27% | 42.8 -7% | 35.2 12% | 35.6 11% | |||
Load Maximum * | 67.3 | 69.6 -3% | 49 27% | 66.7 1% | 101.44 -51% | 47.5 29% | 65.2 ? 3% | 61.6 ? 8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 68.2 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Power consumption external screen
电池运行时间
联想提供两种规格的电池(48 Wh 和 64 Wh),我们的测试设备配备的是较大的模块,可以提供非常长的电池运行时间。在 150 尼特(最大亮度的 65%)和 60 Hz 的条件下,我们的 Wi-Fi 测试持续了近 13 个小时,在最大亮度条件下仍持续了 9 个小时。我们的视频测试甚至持续了近 19 个小时,而在负载情况下,1.5 个小时左右即可耗尽电池。总之,测试结果非常好,与上一代产品相比有明显改善。 上一代产品.设备开机后,完全充电需要 89 分钟(58 分钟后为 80%)。
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 Ultra 5 225U, Graphics 4-Core, 64 Wh | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T, 50 Wh | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV R5 8640U, Radeon 760M, 54 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 45 Wh | HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, 76 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE R5 7535HS, Radeon 660M, 57 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -31% | -62% | -23% | -5% | 2% | -9% | |
H.264 | 1127 | 839 -26% | 728 -35% | 771 ? -32% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 769 | 531 -31% | 290 -62% | 528 -31% | 924 20% | 535 -30% | 661 ? -14% |
Load | 93 | 79 -15% | 86 -8% | 159 71% | 109.9 ? 18% |
笔记本检查评级
联想新推出的 ThinkPad E16 G3 确实是一款性价比很高的办公笔记本电脑。全新的 120 Hz 屏幕非常适合生产性任务,电池续航时间也比以前更长。英特尔的 Arrow Lake 处理器提供了足够的性能,但你也可以选择更快的 CPU(包括更快的 iGPU)。ThinkPad E16 G3 的售价约为 1,000 欧元,是目前最好的选择之一。
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00
- 07/16/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00F00 Intel Core Ultra 5 225U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $848.95 Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21... 2. $1,567.01 Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 3 2... 3. $1,149.00 Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G2 16" F... List Price: 899€ | 1.7 kg | 17.1 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Intel Core Ultra 5 225H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130T ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $108.14 A-Tech 32GB RAM for ASUS Exp... 2. $34.99 Laptop Case Cover Sleeve for... 3. $1,699.99 ASUS ExpertBook B5 Thin & Li... List Price: 1300€ | 1.7 kg | 18 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV AMD Ryzen 5 8640U ⎘ AMD Radeon 760M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1000 EUR | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $749.00 List Price: 750 USD | 1.8 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1504 Euro | 1.9 kg | 19.2 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 2 21M5002VGE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 660M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $669.99 List Price: 935€ | 1.9 kg | 21.3 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.