结论——Surface Pro OLED 2026 配备了更快的集成显卡
微软对其Surface Pro OLED二合一笔记本进行了更新，搭载了高通最新的骁龙处理器，但微软仅采用了高通最慢的骁龙X Elite处理器，搭配最慢的Adreno X2-85 GPU。虽然GPU性能仍比之前有了显著提升，但CPU性能仅略有提升。 微软再次为商务客户推出了搭载Panther Lake处理器的英特尔版本，但其性能实际上应与骁龙版本相当。
其他所有方面基本保持一致，包括那块出色的OLED屏幕——亮度表现不俗（SDR模式下600尼特，HDR模式下最高可达930尼特），并且出厂即支持sRGB和P3的精准色彩配置文件。 连接接口仅限于两个 USB-C 4.0 端口以及微软专有的 Surface Connect 端口，但没有读卡器或 3.5 毫米立体声插孔。 用户仍可更换紧凑型 M.2-2230 SSD，并享有高速 Wi-Fi 7 支持，但 5G 功能仅限于商务版机型。
Surface Pro 也受到当前涨价潮的影响，新款基础型号配备 OLED 屏幕、骁龙 X2 Elite 处理器、16 GB 内存和 512 GB SSD 存储，起售价为 1799 美元，因此比 2024 款贵了 300 美元。 两款机型之间的差异非常小，因此我们建议您选择 上一代机型 。
Pros
Cons
规格
机箱、连接性和输入设备
微软并未对 Surface Pro 进行改动，这意味着您依然能获得一款稳定性极佳、配备一体式支架的高品质机身。机身背面有一个小巧的磁吸式维护舱门，可通过该舱门访问可更换的 M.2-2230 SSD。 我们的评测机型未附带键盘保护套，但微软提供多种型号可供选购。
微软仍保留了两个 USB-C 接口，以及用于连接微软自有外设（如扩展坞）的 Surface Connect 接口。 高通的 Wi-Fi 7 模块在配合相应路由器使用时可提供非常出色的传输速率，但蓝牙仅支持 5.4 标准。摄像头表现依然相当出色，并支持人脸识别。电容式触摸屏再次支持手写笔输入。
| Networking | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
显示屏——13英寸OLED，120 Hz
显示屏规格未作更改，OLED面板仍由三星供应。整体画质依然非常出色，但在显示较亮的内容时，由于触控层的存在，再次能看到轻微的锯齿效应。 响应时间表现优异，但我们再次检测到480 Hz的PWM闪烁现象，尽管其振幅相当小。亮度和色温均可通过传感器实现自动调节。
我们使用专业级CalMAN软件进行的分析显示，出厂预装的色彩配置文件（sRGB和P3的“鲜艳”模式）下，亮度数值良好，色彩准确。 SDR 亮度约为 600 尼特，HDR 内容的亮度最高可达 930 尼特（纯白图像为 798 尼特）。色彩准确度已非常出色，Surface Pro 无需额外校准，因此进行图片编辑完全不成问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 599 cd/m²
Contrast: 11980:1 (Black: 0.05 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
89% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
98.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
98.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
CCT: 6556 K
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED ATNA30DW05-0, OLED, 2880x1920, 13", 120 Hz | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake ATNA30DW02-0, OLED, 2880x1920, 13", 120 Hz | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ ATNA30DW01-1, OLED, 2880x1920, 13", 120 Hz | Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ LP129WT342166, IPS, 2880x1920, 13", 120 Hz | Minisforum V3 BOE, NE140QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 165 Hz | Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 ATNA33AA08-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 1% | -9% | -1% | 1% | |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 930 | |||||
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 98.8 | 99.5 1% | 98.9 0% | 83.4 -16% | 97.7 -1% | 99.5 1% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 98.8 | 100 1% | 99.4 1% | 99.7 1% | 99.8 1% | 99.6 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 89 | 89.7 1% | 89.5 1% | 79.4 -11% | 85.4 -4% | 89.9 1% |
| Response Times | -3% | 6% | -7754% | -2203% | -215% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.32 ? | 0.43 ? -34% | 0.32 ? -0% | 39.6 ? -12275% | 10 ? -3025% | 1.54 ? -381% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.54 ? | 0.54 ? -0% | 0.58 ? -7% | 18 ? -3233% | 8 ? -1381% | 1.41 ? -161% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 480 ? | 480 ? | 480 ? | 240 ? | ||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 33 | 25 24% | 25 24% | 67 -103% | ||
| Screen | 19% | 22% | -142% | -186% | 25% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 599 | 574 -4% | 580 -3% | 585 -2% | 512 -15% | 362 -40% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 603 | 578 -4% | 581 -4% | 574 -5% | 495 -18% | 364 -40% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 99 | 99 0% | 99 0% | 89 -10% | 91 -8% | 99 0% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.05 | 0.04 20% | 0.56 -1020% | 0.48 -860% | 0.01 80% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 11980 | 14500 21% | 1045 -91% | 1067 -91% | 36200 202% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 0.9 31% | 0.7 46% | 1.3 -0% | 4.32 -232% | 1.5 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.8 | 2.3 18% | 2.1 25% | 3 -7% | 7.04 -151% | 3.1 -11% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 0.6 70% | 0.6 70% | 2 -0% | 4.22 -111% | 1.6 20% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.16 102% | 2.16 102% | 2.18 101% | 2.31 95% | 2.12 104% |
| CCT | 6556 99% | 6482 100% | 6484 100% | 6914 94% | 6770 96% | 6514 100% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.17 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
9% | 10% /
14% | -2635% /
-1282% | -797% /
-454% | -63% /
-32% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.29 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz Amplitude: 33 % | ≤ 80 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7763 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
表现
测试条件
Surface Pro 仅使用标准的 Windows 性能配置文件。我们在基准测试和测量中采用了“最佳性能”配置。
处理器性能
微软使用 X2E-78-100，这是高通骁龙X2 Elite系列中性能最弱的芯片。该芯片拥有12个核心（6个性能核心，主频4.0 GHz；6个能效核心，主频3.4 GHz）。 该CPU的功耗最高可达30瓦，随后在几分钟内降至18瓦（电池供电时表现相同）。与之前的 X1E-80-100 仅高出几个百分点，而面向企业客户的英特尔版本中搭载的Panther Lake处理器在多核场景下的性能应会稍慢一些。我们首先列出了原生基准测试（Cinebench 2024 和 Geekbench 6）结果，并在下方补充了模拟基准测试数据，以便您全面了解情况。
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (619 - 1078, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Tablet (124.9 - 133, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Average of class Tablet (1104 - 16544, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Average of class Tablet (323 - 4128, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Cinebench R15 多循环测试
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (8043 - 11875, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet (1400 - 1921, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet (3137 - 4581, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Average of class Tablet (529 - 739, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (1285 - 2320, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet (255 - 299, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (285 - 484, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (24486 - 50406, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Tablet (4769 - 5991, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet (7.11 - 12.9, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (48.3 - 62.8, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Tablet (0.4361 - 0.603, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Minisforum V3 -1! | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake -1! | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED -1! | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 -1! | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ -1! | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ -1! | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Tablet (7564 - 12759, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Tablet (27866 - 62102, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Tablet (2056 - 3528, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Tablet (n=1last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Tablet (2435 - 4429, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Tablet (16203 - 31836, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Tablet (34551 - 63831, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Tablet (434 - 853, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Tablet (4019 - 6803, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Tablet (39444 - 54886, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Average of class Tablet (857 - 2014, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
系统和存储设备
系统性能非常出色，Surface Pro 的运行响应极为迅速。微软已显著提升了兼容性，但我们仍建议您在购买 ARM 设备前先确认软件支持情况。 基础款仅配备了 512 GB SSD（可用空间 422 GB），但这款来自 SK 海力士的小型 M.2-2230 SSD（PCIe 4.0）性能非常出色且稳定。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 2375, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Average of class Tablet (346 - 2036, n=44, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 (n=1) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Average of class Tablet (288 - 2620, n=44, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Tablet (333 - 12671, n=44, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet (108 - 520, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Average of class Tablet (39 - 376, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Tablet (243 - 27101, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
* ... smaller is better
» No benchmarks for this notebook found!
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet (60613 - 110050, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (85395 - 122306, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Average of class Tablet (43045 - 117859, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Average of class Tablet (94.4 - 101.7, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
GPU 和游戏性能
X2E-78-100 搭载了 Adreno X2-85 GPU，但这也是性能最弱的一个版本，最高时钟频率仅为1.35 GHz（其他版本最高可达1.7 GHz）。与旧款 Adreno X1-85 （平均快约40%），但与旧款 Arc Graphics 140V （2025年款）仍稍显逊色。2026年推出的新款英特尔SKU仅搭载了性能较弱的 Panther Lake 集成显卡 （4个Xe核心），因此其图形性能总体上应与骁龙版本相当。您还可以玩一些游戏，我们未遇到任何兼容性问题，但通常需要降低分辨率或画质设置。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 9002 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7218 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2926 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 711 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3464 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (564 - 688, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Minisforum V3 -1! | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ -1! | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ -2! | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 -3! | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet (22.8 - 28.3, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Average of class Tablet (21.1 - 27.8, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet (23.1 - 34.4, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet (44.4 - 58, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average of class Tablet (29.4 - 40.4, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
《赛博朋克2077》超高清帧率图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 135.9 | 127.5 | 62.5 | 27.2 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 91.8 | 76.2 | 68.1 | 60.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 79.6 | 42.9 | 23.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 54.7 | 48 | 40.4 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 196.2 | 70.4 | 57.6 | 48.3 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 39.4 | 29.3 | 25.6 | 25 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 40.7 | 31.9 | 27.2 | 23.9 |
排放与能耗
系统噪声
Surface Pro 采用了带风扇的主动散热方案，但在日常使用场景中，它通常非常安静甚至完全无声。短暂的峰值负载或纯 GPU 负载也不会产生太大噪音，但当你对 CPU 核心进行压力测试时，噪音就会非常明显。 我们在游戏过程中测得噪音约为 38 dB(A)，而在压力测试期间最高达到 47.2 dB(A)，这比之前稍大一些，总体来说相当响。 另外两种性能模式的噪音稍低一些（平衡模式：43.6 dB(A)，最佳能效模式：41.9 dB(A)），但仍未达到我们期望的静音水平。我们未听到任何其他电子噪音。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25.1 / 25.1 / 25.1 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 25.1 / 47.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.1 dB(A) | ||
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED X2E-78-100, X2-85 | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Minisforum V3 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M | Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | -5% | 2% | -11% | 6% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 25.1 | 23.6 6% | 23.6 6% | 23.8 5% | 25.4 -1% | 23.7 6% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25.1 | 23.6 6% | 23.6 6% | 23.8 5% | 26.7 -6% | 23.7 6% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25.1 | 23.6 6% | 23.6 6% | 23.8 5% | 31.6 -26% | 23.7 6% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 25.1 | 23.6 6% | 25.2 -0% | 23.8 5% | 32.5 -29% | 23.7 6% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 25.1 | 23.6 6% | 39 -55% | 23.8 5% | 32.7 -30% | 26.7 -6% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 38.5 | 44.9 -17% | 39 -1% | 44.7 -16% | 35.1 9% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 47.2 | 44.9 5% | 44.8 5% | 44.7 5% | 34 28% | 40 15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 33.2 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
只有在对这款二合一设备进行高强度使用时，机身表面才会发热，我们测得机身后部最高温度达46 °C，这会让人感到有些不适。不过，如果将其放在桌子上或膝盖上使用，通常不会与皮肤直接接触。 在CPU和GPU同时负载的情况下，SoC的功耗最高可达37瓦，但随后又会稳定在18瓦左右。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the class Tablet.
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED X2E-78-100, X2-85 | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Minisforum V3 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M | Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -1% | -1% | 3% | -25% | -4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 43.1 | 43.9 -2% | 43.1 -0% | 43.9 -2% | 50.5 -17% | 43.7 -1% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 45.9 | 45.3 1% | 46.3 -1% | 44.9 2% | 54.8 -19% | 43.9 4% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 26.8 | 29.5 -10% | 27.5 -3% | 26.2 2% | 34.9 -30% | 31.9 -19% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 27.2 | 25.7 6% | 26.8 1% | 24.6 10% | 36.3 -33% | 27.6 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
演讲嘉宾
扬声器的表现不错，与上一代ARM版Surface Pro相比没有变化。
Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Minisforum V3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
功耗与电池续航时间
我们的功耗测试结果并未出现意外，尽管待机功耗比之前略高。在压力测试中，我们测得最高功耗达60.3瓦，随后稳定在39瓦左右，因此建议使用65瓦的电源。
电池容量仍为53 Wh，但在续航测试中我们观察到了一些微小的提升。在150尼特的亮度下进行Wi-Fi测试时，续航时间接近12小时；而在最大亮度下，续航时间仍可达6.5小时。
| Off / Standby | 0.13 / 0.38 Watt |
| Idle | 4.8 / 6.1 / 6.7 Watt |
| Load |
22.5 / 60.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
功耗测试：《赛博朋克》/压力测试
外部显示器的功耗
电池续航时间
Notebookcheck 评分
Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED
- 07/07/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 83.7%  | Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1899€ | 882 g | 9.3 mm | 13.00" 2880x1920 266 PPI OLED |
2. 84.2%  | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake Intel Core Ultra 7 268V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,399.99 Microsoft Surface Pro Copilo... 2. $1,999.99 Microsoft Surface Pro (2026)... 3. $1,039.99 Microsoft Surface Pro 11 Tab... List Price: 2640€ | 882 g | 9.3 mm | 13.00" 2880x1920 266 PPI OLED |
3. 82.5%  | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1999€ | 870 g | 9.3 mm | 13.00" 2880x1920 266 PPI OLED |
4. 80.7%  | Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1199€ | 872 g | 9.3 mm | 13.00" 2880x1920 266 PPI IPS |
5. 85.7% v7 (old)  | Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $449.99 KOOTIGERS Mini PC N150 (up t... 2. MINISFORUM G1 Pro Gaming Min... 3. $819.00 MINISFORUM Venus UM790 Pro M... List Price: 1699 EUR | 928 g | 9.8 mm | 14.00" 2560x1600 IPS |
6. 85.3%  | Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,149.99 ASUS ProArt PZ13 AI Powered ... 2. $2,079.99 ASUS 2025 ProArt PX13 (Repla... 3. $1,179.99 ASUS ProArt PZ13 2-in-1 AI C... List Price: 1599€ | 874 g | 9 mm | 13.30" 2880x1800 255 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
