结论——时尚不等于廉价
惠普 EliteBook 的 X 系列、1000 系列和 Ultra 系列机型在我们的测试中通常表现优异,而 EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 也延续了这一趋势。这些机型始终拥有引人注目的外观设计,同时在接口、电池续航、配置、音质以及商务笔记本中较为舒适的键盘等方面均未妥协。 尤其是其显示屏选项的丰富程度,与大多数其他二合一笔记本相比更是令人惊叹。今年,经过适度改进后,新款 EliteBook 二合一笔记本比以往更轻便,更便于携带,对于触控笔用户而言尤为如此。
有几个需要注意的难点。 追求极致画质的用户不妨考虑BrightView配置,而非颗粒感更强的哑光屏选项。在运行高负载任务时,核心温度可能会升高。专业用户可考虑Core Ultra X7配置,其图形性能比去年的机型显著提升。
当然,价格正日益成为关注焦点——惠普这款笔记本的起售价为2200美元,而本评测机型的配置价格则超过3500美元。相比之下,戴尔Pro 14 Plus二合一笔记本等替代产品起售价低得多,尽管它们机身较厚且搭载了速度较慢的Lunar Lake处理器。
Pros
Cons
Table of Contents
EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 作为去年 EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 的继任者,不仅采用了更新的设计,还提供了更新的 Panther Lake 处理器选项。它是惠普 14 英寸 EliteBook 产品线中最高端的可变形笔记本之一。
我们测试的这台是高端配置机型,搭载 Core Ultra 7 366H 处理器和 1800p OLED 触摸屏,售价约为 3000 至 3500 美元。其他型号则提供 Core Ultra X7 处理器或 1200p IPS 触摸屏的配置。
同类竞品包括其他面向商务用户的旗舰级二合一笔记本,例如戴尔 Latitude 9450 二合一、微星 Prestige 14 Flip 以及联想 ThinkPad L13 二合一系列。请注意,EliteBook 系列不应与更侧重专业消费级市场的 OmniBook 系列混淆。
更多惠普评测:
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
这款全金属机身在去年的 EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 基础上进行了若干外观调整,例如更平滑的边缘和棱角、镀铬边框,以及触控板和键盘的细微视觉更新。 最重要的是,新机型现在在右侧边缘集成了一个触控笔收纳槽,用于安全存放主动式触控笔,同时整体重量却减轻了近200克。其余端口配置与之前保持一致。
连接性
沟通
WAN 接口与之前一样为可选配置。如果未配置 WAN,则可将空闲的 M.2 2242 插槽用作辅助存储。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
网络摄像头

可持续发展
与去年的G1i机型类似,今年的机型由PCC塑料和不同比例的再生金属制成。其包装不含塑料,且可完全回收利用。
配件与保修
零售包装盒中附带一支主动式触控笔。若在美国购买,产品标配三年有限制造商保修。
显示
OLED和IPS面板分别提供1800p和1200p的显示选项,此外还有Tandem OLED、Sure View或镜面屏(而非哑光屏)等选项。我们测试的具体机型配备了更昂贵的配置:1800p哑光Tandem OLED,刷新率为120 Hz。 虽然其纸面规格令人印象深刻,但请注意,该哑光覆膜比大多数其他哑光面板看起来颗粒感更强,因此若为 EliteBook 配置哑光显示屏,色彩和文字的呈现效果会显得不够鲜活,清晰度也会有所降低。
根据我们的 X-Rite 色度计测得,启用 HDR 时,最大亮度可达 1005 尼特。 否则,SDR内容的峰值亮度为469尼特。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 468.9 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.26 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.7}
calibrated: 1.05
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.95}
93.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.33
CCT: 6454 K
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI Samsung SDC422D, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI AUO8FB5, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 CMN1474, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 ATNA40KW05-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 Lenovo LEN140WUXGA, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -14% | -19% | -1% | 2% | -11% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.6 | 76.7 -23% | 69 -31% | 100 0% | 98.5 -1% | 80.6 -19% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 98.2 -2% | 99.2 -1% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 93.5 | 78.2 -16% | 71.1 -24% | 91.8 -2% | 99.9 7% | 80.1 -14% |
| Response Times | -5362% | -6265% | -95% | -67% | -6851% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.62 ? | 49.2 ? -7835% | 54.5 ? -8690% | 1.87 ? -202% | 1.5 ? -142% | 59.6 ? -9513% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.83 ? | 24.8 ? -2888% | 32.7 ? -3840% | 1.53 ? -84% | 1.4 ? -69% | 35.6 ? -4189% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1001 ? | 480 ? | 240 ? | |||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 22 | 22 -0% | 20 9% | |||
| Screen | -50% | 4% | 9% | -6% | 8% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 468.9 | 572 22% | 351.3 -25% | 292 -38% | 360 -23% | 501.4 7% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 470 | 541 15% | 328 -30% | 292 -38% | 357 -24% | 491 4% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 78 -20% | 86 -12% | 98 0% | 97 -1% | 88 -10% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.2 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.32 | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.26 | 4.19 -29% | 2.29 30% | 1.4 57% | 2.12 35% | 2.52 23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.16 | 8.65 -40% | 4.55 26% | 2.2 64% | 4.59 25% | 4.87 21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.05 | 2.11 -101% | 0.49 53% | 1.9 -81% | 0.45 57% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 5.65 -197% | 2.2 -16% | 1.7 11% | 1.4 26% | 2.8 -47% |
| Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.45 90% | 2.13 103% | 2.12 104% | 2.187 101% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 6454 101% | 5959 109% | 6321 103% | 6510 100% | 6366 102% | 6270 104% |
| Contrast (:1) | 2860 | 1464 | 29200 | 360000 | 1567 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1809% /
-926% | -2093% /
-1047% | -29% /
-19% | -24% /
-18% | -2285% /
-1140% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.83 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.37 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.46 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.29 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.33 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1001 Hz Amplitude: 22 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1001 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1001 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7683 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 和 HP 软件设置为“性能”模式。
处理器性能
在原始处理器性能方面,Core Ultra 7 366H 与 Core Ultra X7 358H 势均力敌。
从基础版 Core Ultra 5 325 配置升级到我们的 Core Ultra 7 366H,多线程性能将提升高达 80%。
Cinebench R15 多核循环测试
Cinebench 2024: CPU Single Core | CPU Multi Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench 2024: CPU Single Core | CPU Multi Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI -1! | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H -1! | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 -1! | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 -1! | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 -1! | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI -1! | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (n=1) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (n=1) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (n=1) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (n=1) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (n=1) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (n=1) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (n=1) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (n=1) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (n=1) | |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Quantized GPU 1.7 | Half Precision GPU 1.7 | Single Precision GPU 1.7
| Performance rating | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 -3! | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 -3! | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 -5! | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI -3! | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 -3! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Geekbench AI / Quantized GPU 1.7 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Geekbench AI / Half Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Geekbench AI / Single Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8858 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速:DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
GPU性能
Graphics 4 Xe3 的性能仅比老旧得多的 Iris Xe G7(96 个执行单元)略快一些。如果图形性能是首要考虑因素,我们建议搭配 Core Ultra X7 358H 和 Arc B390 进行配置,这样性能可提升近 2.5 倍。
| 功耗配置文件 | 图形性能得分 | 物理性能得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式 | 7229 | 29830 | 2223 |
| 平衡模式 | 7197 | 29241 | 2236 |
| 电池供电 | 7183 | 29991 | 2260 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 8558 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 34848 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6503 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3366 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 -1! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
《赛博朋克2077》极高画质帧率图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 182 | 170.6 | 52.4 | 21.8 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 129 | 90 | 81.6 | 77.3 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 69.4 | 37.3 | 27.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 42.2 | 37.6 | 30.7 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 119.6 | 45.4 | 38.1 | 28.9 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 33.6 | 27.7 | 24.3 | 23.7 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 39 | 29.8 | 25.6 | 21.6 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 66.7 | 62.3 | 46.1 | 14.9 |
排放
系统噪音
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23.3 / 23.3 / 23.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 24 / 47.6 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 340, Radeon 840M | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 8% | -4% | -11% | -18% | -10% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 22.8 | 23 -1% | 23 -1% | 25.4 -11% | 25 -10% | 23.9 -5% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.3 | 23 1% | 23 1% | 25.4 -9% | 25 -7% | 23.9 -3% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 23.3 | 23 1% | 23 1% | 25.4 -9% | 27 -16% | 23.9 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 23.8 | 23 3% | 23 3% | 25.4 -7% | 30 -26% | 23.9 -0% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 24 | 27.14 -13% | 31 -29% | 33.1 -38% | 43 -79% | 36.4 -52% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 43.9 | 31.65 28% | 45.7 -4% | 46.5 -6% | 42 4% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 47.6 | 31.65 34% | 47.7 -0% | 46.5 2% | 44 8% | 44.7 6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 44.7 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.6 °C / 97.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-8.6 °C / -15.5 F).
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 340, Radeon 840M | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 3% | 1% | -3% | -12% | 2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 43.8 | 36 18% | 39 11% | 47.1 -8% | 47 -7% | 35.4 19% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 43.6 | 41 6% | 43.6 -0% | 46.2 -6% | 49 -12% | 37.8 13% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 24.6 | 26 -6% | 24.4 1% | 24.3 1% | 28 -14% | 27.2 -11% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 25.2 | 27 -7% | 27.4 -9% | 24.5 3% | 29 -15% | 28.2 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
| 平均 CPU 时钟频率 (GHz) | GPU 时钟频率 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) 系统空闲 | |
| -- | |||
| -- | |||
| 49 | |||
| Prime95 压力测试 | |||
| 2.3 | |||
| -- | |||
| 82 | |||
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力测试 | |||
| 1.6 | |||
| 1400 | |||
| 89 | |||
| 《赛博朋克2077》压力测试 | |||
| 0.9 | |||
| 2500 | |||
| 97 |
HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
能源管理
功耗
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, , OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-1T00-1006, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 340, Radeon 840M, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-512G-1101, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), , IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | 19% | 11% | 0% | -14% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 2.9 | 2.9 -0% | 1.8 38% | 2.8 3% | 4 -38% | 3.2 -10% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 3.8 | 8.2 -116% | 4.4 -16% | 4.2 -11% | 5 -32% | 6.4 -68% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 11.9 | 8.6 28% | 4.5 62% | 4.5 62% | 7 41% | 10.8 9% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 42.8 | 39.6 7% | 40.7 5% | 48.9 -14% | 52 -21% | 54.6 -28% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 59.6 | 41.9 30% | 56.5 5% | 59.9 -1% | 54.8 8% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 59.6 | 36.4 39% | 54.6 8% | 58.6 2% | 52.6 12% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 97.4 | 70 28% | 66 32% | 64 34% | 68 30% | 70.2 28% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 35.5 |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克 / 压力测试
外接显示器的功耗
电池续航时间
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI Ultra 7 366H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 68 Wh | HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 68 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core, 68 Wh | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 81 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 340, Radeon 840M, 70 Wh | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), 60 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 21% | 7% | 29% | -25% | -11% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 15.2 | 18.4 21% | 16.2 7% | 19.6 29% | 11.4 -25% | 13.6 -11% |
| H.264 (h) | 20.6 | |||||
| Load (h) | 2.1 | 1.7 | 2.4 | |||
| Reader / Idle (h) | 55.9 | 21.7 |
Notebookcheck 评分
与初代 EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 相比,这款产品在性能、重量和外观设计等几乎所有方面都有所改进,但颗粒感明显的哑光屏幕可能会让部分用户感到不适。
HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI
- 08/26/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
潜在竞争对手的对比分析
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HP EliteBook X Flip G2i 14 AI Intel Core Ultra 7 366H ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 3500 USD | 1.3 kg | 17.2 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2889 Euro | 1.5 kg | 14.7 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Intel Core Ultra 7 165H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2800 USD | 1.5 kg | 14.7 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,999.00 msi Prestige 16 Flip AI+ 16"... 2. $2,399.00 EXCaliberPC [2026] MSI Prest... 3. $2,399.00 MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ Pre... List Price: 1549€ | 1.4 kg | 13.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 ⎘ AMD Radeon 840M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1000 EUR | 1.4 kg | 16.5 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
| Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 3000 USD | 1.6 kg | 16.28 mm | 14.00" 2560x1600 216 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
















































































