评语：ThinkPad T16 G5 屏幕不佳，令人失望
新款 ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 是一款相当令人失望的高价位商务笔记本电脑。机身的变化是好的，可维修性的提高无疑是一个优势，但糟糕的屏幕影响了整体用户体验。它只覆盖了 60% 的 sRGB 色域，图像质量相当差，这对于高端 T 系列来说是难以接受的。虽然有更多色域的屏幕可供选择，但没有更高分辨率和/或刷新率的屏幕可供选择。入门级评测机的另一个问题是，采用老式 Zen 4 处理器、16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘，总体性能令人失望。
显然，它也有积极的一面，包括 Wi-Fi 7 和 Thunderbolt 4 等连接功能和端口、舒适的输入设备以及较长的电池续航时间。此外，音质也让我们感到惊喜，不仅对于商务笔记本电脑来说，它的音质也非常好。风扇也非常安静，但即使在空转时也会偶尔转动，这很令人讨厌。总而言之，T16 Gen 5 是一款不错的商务笔记本电脑，但它的不足之处在于显示屏。如果你对这款设备感兴趣，我们强烈建议你选择更好的显示屏。
Pros
Cons
- $1,299.95Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 Business Laptop 16 FHD+ Display, Intel Ultra 5-225U (Beats i7-1355U), 16GB DDR5 RAM, 512GB SSD, 5MB Webcam, Fingerprint, Backlit KB, WiFi 6E, RJ-45, Win 11 Pro
- $1,199.99Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 Laptop - Intel Core Ultra 5 225U, 16GB RAM, 512 GB SSD, W11 Pro, 16" WUXGA IPS, Non-Touch - Eclipse Black (21QE005WUS)
- $1,599.99Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 Copilot+ Business Laptop 16.0" FHD+ IPS (AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (> Ultra 7 255U), 32GB DDR5, 1TB SSD, Backlit KB, Fingerprint, 2 Thunderbolt 4, IR Webcam, Win 11 Pro)
ThinkPad T16 是联想的高端商务笔记本电脑，配备 16 英寸大屏幕，在新一代 G5 上有一些变化。你仍然可以在 AMD 和英特尔芯片之间做出选择，我们今天评测的是入门级机型，配备 AMD Ryzen PRO CPU、16 GB 内存、512 GB 固态硬盘以及标准 IPS 屏幕。虽然规格一般，但 1639 美元的价格仍然相当高。
规格
外壳和连接
联想为新的五代机型 T16 更改了机身结构，尽管整体视觉外观（包括摄像头凸起）仍与之前基本相同。最明显的变化是采用了新的中央铰链设计（而不是两个小铰链），因此下边框更小了一些。虽然由于使用了塑料材质，可能给人的感觉不是很高档，但整体质量仍然非常出色。机身表面没有想象中那么容易吸附灰尘，稳定性也非常好，没有任何吱吱嘎嘎的声音。铰链调节良好，最大开启角度为 180 度。维护选项仅限于单个 M.2-2280 固态硬盘，内存有两个普通的 SO-DIMM 插槽，风扇可以清洁。
连接性非常好，有 Wi-Fi 7、千兆以太网和用于 LTE 模块的天线（预装天线），以及包括 Thunderbolt 4 在内的足够数量的端口。Wi-Fi 7 性能尚可，稳定在 2 Gbps 左右，配备机械快门（和红外）的 500 万像素摄像头能拍摄出不错的照片。
| Networking | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
输入设备
背光键盘的键程仍为 1.5 毫米，形状也是我们熟悉的样子，但字体有所变化，现在位于按键的中间。输入体验非常好，按键清脆。右侧还有一个数字键盘。T16 仍采用带机械按键的 Trackpoint，而且效果非常好。点击板本身偏向左侧，尺寸略小（11.5 x 6.7 厘米），但具有良好的滑动能力，下半部的机械点击声音也不大。
显示屏 - 普通的 IPS 屏幕
这可能是最有争议的部分，因为即使这是一款高端商务笔记本电脑，联想也只提供 60 Hz 的全高清面板，而我们评测机上的基本面板只能覆盖约 60% 的 sRGB 色域。因此，图像质量不是很好，色彩看起来有些苍白。亮度平均为 450 尼特，还算不错，但黑色值受到影响（0.51），因此对比度只有 939:1。在较高亮度下会出现一些背光出血现象，但响应时间尚可，也没有出现 PWM 闪烁。
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析，再次证实这是一款经济型 IPS 面板。虽然灰度表现还算不错，但色彩准确度却非常糟糕，而且我们自己的校准也无法解决这个问题。该面板根本无法准确呈现色彩。考虑到价格区间，默认选择应该是 100 % sRGB 的 IPS 屏幕。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 479 cd/m²
Contrast: 939:1 (Black: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
calibrated: 3.8
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
42% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
61.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
40.7% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
CCT: 6777 K
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE N160JCA-ELN, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M BOE NV160WUM-N43, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 N160JCA-GT1, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE N160JCA-EEM, LED IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA NE160QDM-NX4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 144 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | 61% | -12% | 66% | 65% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 40.7 | 39.9 -2% | 65.9 62% | 35.7 -12% | 68.5 68% | 68.5 68% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 61.1 | 58 -5% | 97.2 59% | 52.9 -13% | 98.6 61% | 98.3 61% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 42 | 41 -2% | 68 62% | 37.1 -12% | 70.4 68% | 69.4 65% |
| Response Times | -30% | -4% | -66% | -85% | -16% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 32.6 ? | 33.7 ? -3% | 35.3 ? -8% | 57.4 ? -76% | 50.2 ? -54% | 35.6 ? -9% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 14.2 ? | 22.1 ? -56% | 14.2 ? -0% | 22.1 ? -56% | 30.7 ? -116% | 17.5 ? -23% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | ||||||
| Screen | -18% | 5% | -21% | 21% | 14% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 479 | 362.3 -24% | 489 2% | 440 -8% | 439.2 -8% | 413 -14% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 452 | 342 -24% | 469 4% | 424 -6% | 405 -10% | 408 -10% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 89 | 88 -1% | 90 1% | 86 -3% | 88 -1% | 94 6% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.51 | 0.5 2% | 0.26 49% | 0.25 51% | 0.31 39% | 0.2 61% |
| Contrast (:1) | 939 | 725 -23% | 1881 100% | 1760 87% | 1417 51% | 2065 120% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 5.63 -37% | 4.3 -5% | 6.8 -66% | 2.2 46% | 3.6 12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.8 | 18.23 -9% | 7 58% | 25.6 -52% | 4.31 74% | 7.1 58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.8 | 3.39 11% | 0.9 76% | 5.8 -53% | 0.49 87% | 1.5 61% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 2.7 -59% | 5.8 -241% | 4 -135% | 3.2 -88% | 4.6 -171% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.19 100% | 2.61 84% | 2.21 100% | 2.3 96% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6777 96% | 6147 106% | 6195 105% | 5985 109% | 6438 101% | 7461 87% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -17% /
-17% | 21% /
16% | -33% /
-25% | 1% /
16% | 21% /
20% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 32.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7816 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
联想自己的电源模式与 Windows 设置同步。我们使用最佳性能模式进行基准测试。
处理器
......（英文 AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 215(鹰点）提供 8 个内核（4x Zen 4、4x Zen 4c），对于 2026 机型来说是一款非常慢的处理器。它足以满足基本办公任务的需求，但 T16 G5 也有配备 Zen 5 Gorgon Point CPU 的机型（最高可达 Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450).CPU 的功耗可在短暂的时间内达到 51 瓦，然后在 32 瓦时趋于平稳，因此无论是在持续工作负载还是电池供电情况下，性能至少是稳定的。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Average of class Office (1673 - 22808, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (10024 - 10048, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (1705 - 1721, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average of class Office (708 - 2130, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Average of class Office (648 - 8840, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (3903 - 3937, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (664 - 668, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Average of class Office (345 - 816, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Average of class Office (250 - 3380, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (1604 - 1617, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (262 - 269, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Average of class Office (99.5 - 312, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Office (158 - 1940, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (314 - 333, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average of class Office (7098 - 76886, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (41255 - 43292, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (6118 - 6220, n=2) | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average of class Office (3387 - 6469, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Geekbench 6.6 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average of class Office (757 - 17846, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (8056 - 9960, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Geekbench 6.6 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (2459 - 2580, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Average of class Office (462 - 2894, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Average of class Office (1483 - 16999, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (7113 - 8181, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (1829 - 1906, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Average of class Office (811 - 2128, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (12.6 - 13.3, n=2) | |
| Average of class Office (2.21 - 26, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average of class Office (41.5 - 102.3, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (53.7 - 55.9, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Average of class Office (0.4098 - 0.888, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (0.4599 - 0.4599, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI -1! | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M -1! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 -1! | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA -1! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE -1! | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE -1! | |
| Average of class Office | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (15376 - 16708, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Office (2083 - 31245, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (67522 - 67527, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Office (8191 - 125394, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (2879 - 2903, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Office (433 - 5755, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Office (22784 - 115197, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (8768 - 8966, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Office (1378 - 18321, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (35610 - 36315, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Office (4601 - 66922, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (52198 - 53125, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Office (4854 - 155900, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Office (114.6 - 1366, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (556 - 658, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (7900 - 8875, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Office (1109 - 17834, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Office (11090 - 65229, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (22912 - 39642, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (377 - 5270, n=9, last 2 years) | |
系统性能
得益于固态硬盘，T16 G5 仍然是一个迅捷的系统，你还可以通过第二个模块升级内存（最大 64 GB，Gorgon Point SKU 最大 96 GB）。我们没有遇到任何稳定性问题。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Average of class Office (2601 - 9298, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (5756 - 6092, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average of class Office (3245 - 11594, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (9146 - 9657, n=2) | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (9306 - 10938, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average of class Office (5336 - 17243, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Average of class Office (2049 - 13541, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (5761 - 6134, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (1472 - 1569, n=2) | |
| Average of class Office (381 - 2010, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (1485 - 1501, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Average of class Office (464 - 1880, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (1541 - 1779, n=2) | |
| Average of class Office (319 - 2361, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average of class Office (360 - 1690, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (1212 - 1269, n=2) | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Average of class Office (129.9 - 455, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (276 - 292, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (235 - 250, n=2) | |
| Average of class Office (104.2 - 313, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average of class Office (391 - 1297, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215, AMD Radeon 740M (538 - 579, n=2) | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6092 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average of class Office (20075 - 110930, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (35500 - 65990, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Office (10084 - 128030, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (30310 - 61156, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Average of class Office (20073 - 119858, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (42605 - 78416, n=2) | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 (105.8 - 108, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Average of class Office (7.6 - 162.9, n=73, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
我们的标准化延迟测试表明，当你想使用实时音频应用程序时，使用当前 BIOS 版本的 ThinkPad T16 G5 会出现一些问题。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average of class Office (365 - 98089, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
T16 G5 AMD 提供单个 M.2-2280 插槽（Hawk point 型号为 PCIe 4.0），我们的评测设备配备了三星 PM9C1b，容量仅为 512 GB（423 GB 可用）。传输速率尚可，在持续工作负载下保持稳定。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
集成的 Radeon 740M 可以处理基本的办公任务，但总的来说是一款相当慢的 iGPU，除了非常简单的游戏和低设置外，几乎无法进行游戏。如果配备双通道内存，性能有望提高约 25%。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 5699 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3257 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1354 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 202 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 1175 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Average of class Office (245 - 3219, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 740M (510 - 687, n=5) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
* ... smaller is better
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average of class Office (3.1 - 61.5, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average of class Office (12.9 - 142.1, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 100.6 | 91.5 | 29.3 | 11.7 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 115.4 | 87 | 53.5 | 47.6 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 35.9 | 17.7 | 12.9 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 34.4 | 26 | 21.4 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 73.2 | 28.6 | 24.3 | 21 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 17.2 | 13.5 | 11 | 10.6 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 19.3 | 14.9 | 11.1 | 9.53 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 36.3 | 31.9 | 23.7 | 5.51 |
排放与功耗
系统噪音
总的来说，T16 G5 是一款非常安静的设备，即使在最大负载下（34 dB(A)），风扇噪音也不会太大，但问题是，即使在空转时，风扇偶尔也会开始旋转约两秒钟。这并不吵闹，但很烦人，我们希望联想能通过 BIOS 更新来解决这一问题。没有其他电子噪音。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24.6 / 24.6 / 26.4 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 28.6 / 34.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.6 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE R5 PRO 215, Radeon 740M | Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M R7 250, Radeon 780M | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE R5 PRO 215, Radeon 740M | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | -7% | -9% | -17% | 3% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.6 | 22.6 8% | 26.3 -7% | 25.6 -4% | 22.7 8% | 23.2 6% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.6 | 22.8 7% | 26.3 -7% | 25.6 -4% | 22.8 7% | 23.2 6% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.6 | 22.9 7% | 26.3 -7% | 25.6 -4% | 22.8 7% | 23.2 6% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 26.4 | 23.5 11% | 26.3 -0% | 27.1 -3% | 24.7 6% | 23.2 12% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 28.6 | 35 -22% | 34.2 -20% | 34.5 -21% | 46 -61% | 26.3 8% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 34.2 | 41.1 -20% | 34.2 -0% | 38.3 -12% | 48.7 -42% | 35.4 -4% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 34.2 | 41.3 -21% | 36.2 -6% | 38.4 -12% | 49.5 -45% | 38.8 -13% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
T16 G5 没有出现任何温度问题，即使在负载情况下，热点温度也仅达到 40 ℃ 左右。在压力测试中，CPU 再次以 32 瓦（72 °C）的功率运行。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.5 °C / 81.5 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE R5 PRO 215, Radeon 740M | Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M R7 250, Radeon 780M | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE R5 PRO 215, Radeon 740M | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 3% | -12% | -10% | -1% | -8% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 37 | 35.8 3% | 44.4 -20% | 37.3 -1% | 38 -3% | 40.7 -10% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 40.9 | 36 12% | 53.8 -32% | 44.5 -9% | 33.4 18% | 47.8 -17% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 24.9 | 25.6 -3% | 24.9 -0% | 28 -12% | 28 -12% | 26 -4% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 26.4 | 26.6 -1% | 25.6 3% | 31.1 -18% | 28.2 -7% | 27 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
联想改进了扬声器的质量（2x 2W），音质出奇地好，这不仅是对商务笔记本电脑而言。麦克风的效果也非常好，因此在电话会议中并不需要耳机就能获得良好的音质。
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
我们的功耗测量结果没有发现任何意外。最大空闲值为 8.1 瓦，我们在压力测试开始时测得约 80 瓦，随后很快降至约 52 瓦。因此，100 瓦的电源适配器绰绰有余。
| Off / Standby | 0.17 / 0.57 Watt |
| Idle | 3.7 / 7.4 / 8.1 Watt |
| Load |
40.8 / 78.9 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE R5 PRO 215, Radeon 740M, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL8512HFLU-00BLL, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M R7 250, Radeon 780M, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE R5 PRO 215, Radeon 740M, Kioxia BG6 KBG6AZNV512G, LED IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M, Micron 3500 MTFDKBA512TGD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Average AMD Radeon 740M | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -6% | -7% | 0% | -15% | -15% | 1% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 3.7 | 3.9 -5% | 3.1 16% | 4.1 -11% | 2.9 22% | 4.7 -27% | 4.54 ? -23% | 4.4 ? -19% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 7.4 | 7.8 -5% | 8.4 -14% | 8.5 -15% | 6.5 12% | 9.7 -31% | 6.94 ? 6% | 7.42 ? -0% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 8.1 | 8.4 -4% | 9.1 -12% | 9.1 -12% | 6.7 17% | 10.1 -25% | 8.28 ? -2% | 8.65 ? -7% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 40.8 | 52.2 -28% | 53.3 -31% | 44.9 -10% | 65.6 -61% | 44.2 -8% | 40.6 ? -0% | 42.5 ? -4% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 43.7 | 46.9 -7% | 42.6 3% | 37.9 13% | 62.8 -44% | 50.9 -16% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 45.1 | 50.2 -11% | 48.6 -8% | 37.5 17% | 65.8 -46% | 50.3 -12% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 78.9 | 62.6 21% | 83.9 -6% | 65 18% | 80.6 -2% | 69.6 12% | 59.4 ? 25% | 64.3 ? 19% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
电池寿命
电池不再用螺丝固定，必要时可以轻松更换，但容量比以前低了（75 Wh 对 86 Wh）。在 150 尼特的 Wi-Fi 测试中，新款 G5 的续航时间接近 16 小时。这是一个不错的结果，与旧款 G4 相比仅缩短了约 1.5 小时。在全亮度条件下，评测机型的续航时间为 11.5 小时，令人印象深刻，而评测机型 G4（亮度稍高）的续航时间约为 10.5 小时。
笔记本检查评级
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE
- 06/10/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 86.9%  | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5 22AN001WGE AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,299.95 Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 Bu... 2. $1,199.99 Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 La... 3. $1,599.99 Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 Co... List Price: 1640€ | 1.9 kg | 18.2 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
2. 83.7%  | Dynabook Tecra A60 A65-M AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $22.98 Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protecto... 2. $15.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... 3. $599.90 acer Dynabook Tecra A40-J A4... List Price: 1300 USD | 1.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
3. 87.4%  | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 21QQS06M00 AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1349€ | 2 kg | 18.1 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
4. 84.8%  | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 2 21SC0029GE AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215 ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1090 Euro | 1.9 kg | 25 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI LED IPS |
5. 87%  | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 4400 USD | 1.9 kg | 15.5 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
6. 84.4%  | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Intel Core Ultra 5 225H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130T ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1300€ | 1.7 kg | 18 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
