Notebookcheck

联想ThinkPad P1 G4笔记本电脑--工作站版的X1 Extreme G4评测

现在有了16英寸和一个更糟糕的键盘。 联想通过第四代ThinkPad P1推出了一款全新的设备,包括一个16:10宽高比的16英寸显示屏和更新的硬件。P1 G4也让人对即将推出的ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4有了初步了解,它采用了相同的机箱。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Business GPU Laptop / Notebook ThinkPad Thunderbolt Tiger Lake Windows Workstation

ThinkPad X1 Extreme是联想几年来的多媒体旗舰笔记本,主要与戴尔XPS 15竞争。ThinkPad P1是工作站的对应产品,第四代产品得到了重大更新,因为联想现在使用16英寸显示屏,长宽比为16:10。除了英特尔的新Tiger Lake-H45处理器(包括至强),你还可以得到Nvidia的新专业GPU。

联想为ThinkPad P1 G4提供了两种基本型号(也适用于X1 Extreme G4),因为根据显卡的不同,你要么得到一个传统的冷却解决方案(与Nvidia T1200&RTX A2000在P1 G4中或RTX 3050 TiX1 Extreme G4中的Nvidia T1200和RTX A2000或RTX 3050 Ti),或结合更强大的显卡使用蒸汽室冷却。不过这种冷却方案需要更多空间,所以只有一个M.2-2280插槽,而且不能配备WWAN模块。

我们的ThinkPad P1 G4的测试单元是一个入门级的模型,代号为20Y30017GE,售价约为2400欧元,配备了新的16英寸显示屏和WQHD分辨率(2560 x 1600像素),配备了酷睿i7-11800H,新的Nvidia T1200 GPU),以及存储容量为512GB的快速PCIe 4.0 SSD。更多ThinkPad评论。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 54 W PL2 / Short Burst, 37 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake H45
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU - 4096 MB, Core: 1840 MHz, Memory: 1255 MHz, GDDR6, 471.41, Optimus
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4-3200, Single-Channel, 1/2 slots in use, max. 64 GB
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, B160QAN02.M, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel WM590 (Tiger Lake PCH-H)
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, 512 GB 
, 429 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SD (UHS-II), 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.7 x 359.5 x 253.8
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 170W PSU, Lenovo Tools, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
1.842 kg, Power Supply: 575 g
Price
2400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

mögliche Konkurrenten im Vergleich

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.4 %
10/2021
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg17.7 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.5 %
03/2020
Dell Precision 5540
i9-9980HK, Quadro T2000 Max-Q
2 kg17 mm15.60"3840x2160
89.7 %
11/2019
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M
2 kg16.2 mm16.00"3072x1920
87.3 %
08/2021
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3840x2160
87 %
09/2021
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2 kg19.5 mm16.00"2560x1600

外壳 - 仍然是典型的ThinkPad

从机箱上看,你很难将新的ThinkPad P1 G4与它的前任区分开来。 前辈.然而,当你打开盖子时,你会立即注意到新的16:10屏幕,边框更窄,键盘旁边还有新的扬声器栅栏。新的电源按钮,也包括指纹扫描仪,稍微向上移动。

材料基本相同,你仍然得到光滑的塑料表面,下面是金属或混合材料。你可以很快看到指纹,与其他ThinkPads类似,我们预计会有油腻的地方。稳定性仍然很好,无论是底座,还是盖子都不能明显的扭曲或凹陷,也没有吱吱嘎嘎的声音。与以前的ThinkPad型号一样,P1 G4符合MIL-STD-810H要求,但联想没有列出个别测试。

两个铰链允许最大打开角度为180度,并且调整得很好,因为几乎没有任何弹跳。不过,在25度或更低的角度,盖子会自动关闭。在实践中,你几乎不会使用这个屏幕位置,所以这不是一个破坏性因素。配备4K触摸屏的机型再次获得了不同的盖子设计,带有碳纤维图案(印刷)。

与之前的笔记本P1,第四代略微更窄、更薄,但也反过来更深了一些。因此,更大的16英寸屏幕并没有真正影响整个机箱的尺寸。在对比组中,新的P1 G4是最大的设备之一,但也是最轻的设备之一,只有1.8公斤。

Size Comparison

361.8 mm 245.7 mm 18.4 mm 1.7 kg359.5 mm 253.8 mm 17.7 mm 1.8 kg358 mm 246 mm 16.2 mm 2 kg354.6 mm 252 mm 19.5 mm 2 kg357 mm 236 mm 17 mm 2 kg354 mm 235 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg

连接性 - 带有雷电4的ThinkPad

ThinkPad P1 G4的端口情况非常好。除了两个现代的USB-C端口,包括Thunderbolt 4,你还可以得到两个普通的USB-A端口,甚至一个全尺寸的SD卡读卡器。电源是通过熟悉的SlimTip连接器提供的,但你也可以通过USB-C给电池充电。然而,65瓦的标准ThinkPad适配器不起作用,我们不得不使用至少90瓦的设备。配备T1200 GPU的机型获得了HDMI 2.0输出(4K @60 Hz),而更强大的RTX GPU获得了HDMI 2.1(最大8K @60 Hz)。联想不再为新P1提供智能卡阅读器。

左侧。电源(SlimTip),2个USB-C和Thunderbolt 4(USB 4,40 Gbps,DisplayPort-ALT模式1.4a,Power Delivery 3.0),HDMI 2.0,3.5 mm立体声。
左侧。电源(SlimTip),2个USB-C和Thunderbolt 4(USB 4,40 Gbps,DisplayPort-ALT模式1.4a,Power Delivery 3.0),HDMI 2.0,3.5 mm立体声。
右侧。SD卡读卡器(UHS-II),2个USB-A 3.2 Gen.2(1个供电),Kensington安全插槽
右侧。SD卡读卡器(UHS-II),2个USB-A 3.2 Gen.2(1个供电),Kensington安全插槽

淘宝网

全尺寸的SD卡读卡器仍然包括在内,我们确定,结合我们的UHS-II参考卡(AV Pro V60),传输速度非常快,超过200 MB/s。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
  (AV PRO V60)
204 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181 MB/s ∼89% -11%
Dell Precision 5540
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
173 MB/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Workstation
  (26.5 - 220, n=30, last 2 years)
138 MB/s ∼68% -32%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
 
78.2 (78.11min - 78.35max) MB/s ∼38% -62%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
  (AV Pro V60)
73.8 MB/s ∼36% -64%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198.2 MB/s ∼100% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
  (AV PRO V60)
192 MB/s ∼97%
Dell Precision 5540
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
188.7 MB/s ∼95% -2%
Average of class Workstation
  (31.6 - 244, n=28, last 2 years)
160 MB/s ∼81% -17%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
  (AV Pro V60)
88.64 MB/s ∼45% -54%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
 
87.88 MB/s ∼44% -54%

通信 - Wi-Fi 6E和蓝牙5.2

ThinkPad P1 G4配备了英特尔的最新Wi-Fi模块AX210。它支持新的Wi-Fi 6E标准以及蓝牙5.2。在我们与路由器Netgear Nighthawk RAX120进行的标准化Wi-Fi测试中,传输速率约为1.4Gbps,在实际测试中,我们也没有发现信号质量或范围有任何问题。没有以太网端口,所以如果你想使用有线网络,你必须使用相应的USB-C适配器。

你可以为ThinkPad P1 G4配置高通公司的5G模块(Snapdragon X55),但之后不能安装,因为没有包括必要的天线(不适合WWAN)。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1419 (1169min - 1609max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1399 (968min - 1531max) MBit/s ∼99%
Average of class Workstation
  (592 - 1642, n=36, last 2 years)
1202 MBit/s ∼85% -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (675 - 1602, n=20)
1163 MBit/s ∼82% -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
706 MBit/s ∼50% -50%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
649 (351min - 778max) MBit/s ∼46% -54%
Dell Precision 5540
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
592 MBit/s ∼42% -58%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Broadcom 802.11ac
581 (533min - 616max) MBit/s ∼41% -58%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1493 (758min - 1553max) MBit/s ∼100%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1363 (1311min - 1453max) MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (914 - 1716, n=20)
1300 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Average of class Workstation
  (628 - 1557, n=36, last 2 years)
1297 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Broadcom 802.11ac
817 (806min - 821max) MBit/s ∼55% -45%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
772 (474min - 988max) MBit/s ∼52% -48%
Dell Precision 5540
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
628 MBit/s ∼42% -58%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
625 MBit/s ∼42% -58%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550758139015091479152415361553149614981518152614741533149515021513149914531436151814911492148314841335145815031526150015387581390150914791524153615531496149815181526147415331495150215131499145314361518149114921483148413351458150315261500153812031468150514941337968141114251511135113581361153013511491130814341518140315111291130813831461150912351464151313251531Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1467 (758-1553)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1399 (968-1531)

网络摄像头 - ThinkPad,带1080p传感器

ThinkPad P1 G4是少数配备1080p网络摄像头(包括机械快门)的现代ThinkPads之一。与通常的720p传感器相比,分辨率和图片质量都略胜一筹,但我们仍然建议使用智能手机来拍摄好照片。还有一个额外的红外摄像头,用于通过Windows Hello进行面部识别。

ColorChecker
16.1 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE: 11.48 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 18.14 ∆E

维护

你只需要松开八颗标准的飞利浦螺丝,就可以拆下底盖,并把它抬起来。每个版本的P1 G4都有两个SODIMM插槽(DDR4-3200,最大64GB)和一个M.2-2280插槽,用于快速PCIe 4.0 SSD。我们配备T1200 GPU的设备(也适用于RTX A2000 GPU)提供一个额外的M.2-2280插槽(PCIe 3.0 x4)。你可以清洁风扇和更换电池(用螺丝固定),但所有其他组件,包括Wi-Fi模块都焊接在主板上。

内部布局
内部布局
2个SODIMM插槽
2个SODIMM插槽

输入设备--像X1 Carbon G9那样减少了按键行程

键盘

下一个大的变化是键盘,因为联想基本上使用了我们所知道的同样的装置,即从X1 Carbon G9,但它稍微宽一点,因为所有的键(也在右侧)都有相同的尺寸。联想将按键行程从之前的1.8毫米减少到1.5毫米。P1 G3/X1 Extreme G3而且还使用了更扁平的按键。与老款ThinkPad相比X1 Carbon G7/G8相比,后者也使用1.5毫米的键程,这导致打字体验略差。与目前的X1 Carbon G9相比,P1 G4的主观体验略好,这要归功于更坚固的底座。总而言之,它仍然是一个好的键盘,但与以前的型号相比更差,与戴尔或惠普等对手相比已经没有优势。有一个两段式的白色照明,适合较暗的环境。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘照明
键盘照明

触摸板和TrackPoint

TrackPoint按钮现在是完全平的。
TrackPoint按钮现在是完全平的。

ClickPad(11.5 x 6.9厘米)提供了良好的滑行能力,并支持微软的Precision 标准,因此包括手势在内的标准操作效果良好。点击机制也给人留下了良好和高质量的印象,点击的声音很闷。与旧的ThinkPad P1,TrackPoint键与X1 Carbon没有相似之处,它们是完全平的。这也意味着行程减少,主观印象更差。咔嚓声也相当响亮,而且还有点咔嚓声。TrackPoint本身运作良好,我们没有遇到任何光标漂移的情况。

显示屏 - WQHD,16:10

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
右上角有一些混浊
右上角有一些混浊

联想为第四代ThinkPad P1配备了IPS显示屏和16:10长宽比。默认屏幕已经是WQHD面板,分辨率为2560 x 1600像素,还有两个可选的4K屏幕(UHD+,HDR,一个带触摸功能)。我们测试装置中的标准显示屏提供了良好的主观画质,尽管是哑光表面,但明亮的表面不会出现颗粒感。内容很清晰,颜色显得很丰富。

制造商宣传的亮度为400尼特,对比度为1200:1,根据我们的测量,测试装置中的AU Optronics面板稍好一些(X-Rite i1 Pro 2 & CalMAN)。联想也在自己的ThinkBook 16p.我们没有发现PWM闪烁,响应时间也不明显。在最大亮度下,你可以注意到在黑色背景的右上角有一些混浊,但在日常工作中几乎看不出来。

380
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
B160QAN02.M
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 420 cd/m² Average: 401.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 418 cd/m²
Contrast: 1400:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 1.6
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
78.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
77.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
B160QAN02.M, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Dell Precision 5540
SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
APPA044, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
SDC4145, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
Lenovo LEN8A95 (AUO B160QAN02.M), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
N156HCE-GN1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
18%
17%
-1%
-15%
Display P3 Coverage
77.3
99.92
29%
99.9
29%
76.4
-1%
62.39
-19%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
91.52
-8%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
78.1
97.32
25%
95.3
22%
77.4
-1%
63.43
-19%
Response Times
91%
-30%
93%
25%
32%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40.8 ?(20.4, 20.4)
2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)
93%
52.4 ?(23.9, 28.5)
-28%
2.4 ?(1, 1.4)
94%
36
12%
34.4 ?(17.2, 17.2)
16%
Response Time Black / White *
26.4 ?(14, 12.4)
3.2 ?(1.2, 2)
88%
34.9 ?(17.8, 17.1)
-32%
2.4 ?(1.1, 1.3)
91%
16.4
38%
14 ?(4.4, 9.6)
47%
PWM Frequency
240.9 ?(50)
131700
240.4 ?(52)
26040 ?(70)
Screen
-18%
11%
-35%
7%
-12%
Brightness middle
420
427
2%
519
24%
379.6
-10%
439
5%
542
29%
Brightness
401
411
2%
477
19%
380
-5%
397
-1%
528
32%
Brightness Distribution
90
89
-1%
86
-4%
95
6%
83
-8%
84
-7%
Black Level *
0.3
0.39
-30%
0.44
-47%
0.41
-37%
Contrast
1400
1331
-5%
998
-29%
1322
-6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.5
3.2
-28%
2.28
9%
5.15
-106%
1.68
33%
3.5
-40%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.9
8.4
-71%
6.54
-33%
7.79
-59%
2.36
52%
7.8
-59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.6
2.8
-75%
0.86
46%
3.1
-94%
1.57
2%
1.3
19%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.4
1.8
47%
0.9
74%
2.6
24%
1.64
52%
4.8
-41%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.15 102%
2145 0%
1.99 111%
2.39 92%
2.33 94%
CCT
6479 100%
6176 105%
6572 99%
6166 105%
6616 98%
7690 85%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
86.8
78
58.8
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
91.1
Total Average (Program / Settings)
30% / 9%
-10% / 4%
25% / -1%
10% / 8%
2% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

该面板在开箱时就已经经过了很好的校准,只是在灰度中出现了轻微的绿色色调,但用肉眼几乎看不到。与sRGB参考色彩空间相比,DeltaE-2000的色彩偏差也非常小,大多数用户不需要额外校准。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
卡尔曼饱和度扫描
卡尔曼饱和度扫描
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN 灰度标定
CalMAN 灰度标定
已校准的CalMAN饱和度扫描
已校准的CalMAN饱和度扫描
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准

我们通过校准成功地改善了画质(上面的盒子里有免费的配置文件),但最大亮度下降了30尼特。只有红色超过了3的重要标志,但由于全sRGB色域,该显示器仍然适合于图片/视频编辑。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17025 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

16英寸的屏幕在户外效果很好,你仍然可以在明亮的环境中使用它。视角的稳定性也非常好。

在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能 -Tiger Lake-H45和Nvidia T1200

处理器 - 酷睿i7-11800H

芯片酷睿i7-11800H来自英特尔的酷睿i7-11800H目前在许多笔记本中使用。它有8个核心(16个线程),最高时钟可达4.6GHz。联想将TDP限制非常慷慨地设定为109瓦,但这个数值纯粹是理论上的。然而,在实践中,该处理器甚至在其标称的45瓦特的TDP下艰难地运行。看一下我们下面的Cinebench循环数据就会发现,TDP很快就超过了50瓦特,但随后迅速下降到40瓦特以下。

对于一台昂贵的工作站来说,在纯粹的CPU负载情况下,这是一个非常糟糕的结果。与我们数据库中的i7-11800H的平均得分相比,i7-11800H也慢了20-30%。总而言之,CPU性能与采用第九代英特尔CPU的移动工作站相当(所以两年多了)。i7-11800H可以快得多,这一点从超薄的游戏笔记本电脑中可以看出Alienware x15,就是一个例子。AMD目前的移动处理器如Ryzen 9 5900HX在价格较低的ThinkBook 16p提供了更多的性能。我们已经迫不及待地想看看采用蒸气室冷却的机型将如何表现。

在电池供电的情况下,性能至少是稳定的。更多的处理器基准测试可在我们的 技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi Dauertest

011022033044055066077088099011001210132014301540165017601870198020901547.991459.641427.911422.421411.531409.541409.491401.151401.981396.61392.851399.631399.871397.771394.021388.551391.931388.741391.31386.631381.791382.311380.51383.321384.81407.711295.841322.621324.681337.171336.451345.581319.651331.911328.111337.841335.071337.121339.231330.891339.91316.531335.021326.041337.841338.511316.481310.441295.841305.741300.471297.821298.451301.791295.211283.531279.021272.671284.811287.371268.871208.391217.621212.381222.831215.291210.11214.111207.81211.281208.971214.111210.691210.691219.921435140713861396139814011401140614071405140214031409140714081407140914081409140314051409141014081405140614111408140714101405140614081406140614021407141414131403140214131405140914091401140714071404141114091405140714111406140314081405140514071410140914071362.311326.261311.391314.061314.581305.441269.121297.231275.921295.171271.51304.81284.231295.881279.061297.351280.71297.731283.611310.491270.081300.471268.871298.741283.941841.111804.241802.051822.661804.481802.371820.421789.951808.561813.241816.371817.271813.811806.281802.781813.41792.841801.881802.451790.991819.511820.081813.811796.861795.981808.891811.761819.341802.531792.681811.351797.591803.021809.051814.221801.961803.351810.771805.711796.541812.251787.471809.381816.781809.221765.461813.41808.151793.81804.162153.782137.892132.652150.082148.692136.072138.352137.322118.312151.932129.812144.312148.112141.672121.122135.382138.472120.552135.842131.42130.152132.22118.872115.282128.34111489610039869669899699689729639669629479739539689699429749559579569609579529469509419539549509559579609579519549549499519579549489549559599559539509672146.52147.072147.542138.352153.92147.652146.842144.772148.922136.872146.842145.692149.962142.362143.512147.652145.582148.922150.082149.272104.272147.072141.332145.462140.412146.382152.852149.042145.462146.962143.622141.4421282143.622146.732149.272135.042145.582145.352136.752145.122154.012147.192132.992135.272131.632145.122143.392150.652147.42Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1405 (1380.5-1547.99)
Dell Precision 5540 Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1288 (1207.8-1407.71)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H; macOS 10.15.1: Ø1407 (1386-1435)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H; Win 10: Ø1296 (1268.87-1362.31)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H: Ø1806 (1765.46-1841.11)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2135 (2115.28-2153.78)
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE Intel Core i7-9850H: Ø961 (896-1114)
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø2144 (2104.27-2154.01)
CPU数据CB R15多循环
CPU数据CB R15多循环
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
13205 Points ∼100% +41%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
12166 (11410min - 12166.4max) Points ∼92% +30%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (8447 - 14088, n=26)
11885 Points ∼90% +27%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Core i7-11800H
9376 Points ∼71%
Average of class Workstation
  (4239 - 12876, n=19, last 2 years)
8859 Points ∼67% -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
8758 Points ∼66% -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
8747 (8681.12min - 8746.74max) Points ∼66% -7%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1569 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1386 - 1520, n=24)
1490 Points ∼95% +3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1488 Points ∼95% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Core i7-11800H
1452 Points ∼93%
Average of class Workstation
  (1162 - 1596, n=19, last 2 years)
1383 Points ∼88% -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
1140 Points ∼73% -21%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5128 Points ∼100% +44%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
4660 Points ∼91% +31%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (3306 - 5408, n=28)
4597 Points ∼90% +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Core i7-11800H
3552 Points ∼69%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
3422 Points ∼67% -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
3057 Points ∼60% -14%
Average of class Workstation
  (1602 - 5180, n=39, last 2 years)
3089 Points ∼60% -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
1800 Points ∼35% -49%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
610 Points ∼100% +8%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
580 Points ∼95% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (520 - 586, n=25)
573 Points ∼94% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Core i7-11800H
563 Points ∼92%
Average of class Workstation
  (436 - 618, n=38, last 2 years)
509 Points ∼83% -10%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
453 Points ∼74% -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
442 Points ∼72% -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
425 Points ∼70% -25%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2154 (2115.28min - 2153.78max) Points ∼100% +39%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1342 - 2173, n=27)
1934 Points ∼90% +25%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1841 (1765.46min - 1841.11max) Points ∼85% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Core i7-11800H
1548 (1380.5min - 1547.99max) Points ∼72%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
1435 (1401min - 1435max) Points ∼67% -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
1362 (1268.87min - 1362.31max) Points ∼63% -12%
Dell Precision 5540
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1407 (1126.13min - 1407max) Points ∼65% -9%
Average of class Workstation
  (675 - 2144, n=43, last 2 years)
1337 Points ∼62% -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
1114 (896min - 1114max) Points ∼52% -28%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
240 Points ∼100% +10%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
236 Points ∼98% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (204 - 231, n=24)
225 Points ∼94% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Core i7-11800H
218 Points ∼91%
Average of class Workstation
  (178 - 241, n=42, last 2 years)
205 Points ∼85% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
193 Points ∼80% -11%
Dell Precision 5540
Intel Core i9-9980HK
193 Points ∼80% -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
184 Points ∼77% -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
184 Points ∼77% -16%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
552 Seconds * ∼100% -62%
Average of class Workstation
  (250 - 703, n=35, last 2 years)
400 Seconds * ∼72% -18%
Dell Precision 5540
Intel Core i9-9980HK
348.4 Seconds * ∼63% -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
343 Seconds * ∼62% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Core i7-11800H
340 Seconds * ∼62%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (217 - 342, n=24)
267 Seconds * ∼48% +21%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
254 Seconds * ∼46% +25%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
233 Seconds * ∼42% +31%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
59653 MIPS ∼100% +58%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
50050 MIPS ∼84% +33%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (37641 - 56758, n=24)
49205 MIPS ∼82% +31%
Dell Precision 5540
Intel Core i9-9980HK
39566 MIPS ∼66% +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
39455 MIPS ∼66% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Core i7-11800H
37641 MIPS ∼63%
Average of class Workstation
  (19147 - 50552, n=36, last 2 years)
36718 MIPS ∼62% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
25786 MIPS ∼43% -31%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5777 MIPS ∼100% +5%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
5773 MIPS ∼100% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Core i7-11800H
5513 MIPS ∼95%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5138 - 5716, n=24)
5479 MIPS ∼95% -1%
Dell Precision 5540
Intel Core i9-9980HK
5283 MIPS ∼91% -4%
Average of class Workstation
  (4417 - 5773, n=36, last 2 years)
5277 MIPS ∼91% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
5086 MIPS ∼88% -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
4837 MIPS ∼84% -12%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
8578 Points ∼100% +32%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (3323 - 9851, n=20)
7360 Points ∼86% +13%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
7286 Points ∼85% +12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
7109 Points ∼83% +9%
Average of class Workstation
  (3852 - 9451, n=32, last 2 years)
6617 Points ∼77% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Core i7-11800H
6495 Points ∼76%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1702 Points ∼100% +11%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1548 Points ∼91% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Core i7-11800H
1538 Points ∼90%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (882 - 1625, n=20)
1390 Points ∼82% -10%
Average of class Workstation
  (1124 - 1702, n=32, last 2 years)
1368 Points ∼80% -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
1115 Points ∼66% -28%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.9 fps ∼100% +47%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
14.5 fps ∼91% +34%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (10.5 - 17.4, n=24)
14.2 fps ∼89% +31%
Dell Precision 5540
Intel Core i9-9980HK
10.8 fps ∼68% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Core i7-11800H
10.8 fps ∼68%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
10.6 fps ∼67% -2%
Average of class Workstation
  (5.24 - 14.6, n=35, last 2 years)
10.2 fps ∼64% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
7 fps ∼44% -35%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
58.9 s * ∼100% -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
16.5 s * ∼28% +66%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
54.1 s * ∼92% -10%
Average of class Workstation
  (41.3 - 106, n=35, last 2 years)
53.4 s * ∼91% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Core i7-11800H
49 s * ∼83%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
48.6 s * ∼83% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38.6 - 50.7, n=24)
46 s * ∼78% +6%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
0.6904 sec * ∼100% -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
0.661 sec * ∼96% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.595 sec * ∼86%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.541 - 0.695, n=34, last 2 years)
0.591 sec * ∼86% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (0.548 - 0.605, n=24)
0.567 sec * ∼82% +5%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
0.551 sec * ∼80% +7%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4998 sec * ∼72% +16%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1548 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
218 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
206 fps
Help

系统性能

从主观上讲,新的ThinkPad P1 G4是一个反应非常快的系统,但当你考虑到包括快速PCIe 4.0在内的组件时,这应该不足为奇。基准分数是平均水平,并不表明有任何限制。

据联想称,ThinkPad P1 G4与新的Windows 11完全兼容,该系统将以免费升级的方式提供。

PCMark 10 / Score
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
6751 Points ∼100% +13%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6725 Points ∼100% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5969 Points ∼88%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
5969 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (4096 - 6939, n=37, last 2 years)
5543 Points ∼82% -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
5500 Points ∼81% -8%
Dell Precision 5540
Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, SK hynix PC400 512 GB
5296 Points ∼78% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5046 Points ∼75% -15%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
10324 Points ∼100% +6%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
9915 Points ∼96% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9784 Points ∼95%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
9784 Points ∼95% 0%
Dell Precision 5540
Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, SK hynix PC400 512 GB
9580 Points ∼93% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
9566 Points ∼93% -2%
Average of class Workstation
  (8059 - 10829, n=37, last 2 years)
9495 Points ∼92% -3%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9128 Points ∼100% +8%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
8461 Points ∼93% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
8445 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
8445 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (6426 - 9317, n=37, last 2 years)
7925 Points ∼87% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
7243 Points ∼79% -14%
Dell Precision 5540
Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, SK hynix PC400 512 GB
7060 Points ∼77% -16%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
9952 Points ∼100% +42%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8759 Points ∼88% +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6985 Points ∼70%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
6985 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (3221 - 10441, n=37, last 2 years)
6319 Points ∼63% -10%
Dell Precision 5540
Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, SK hynix PC400 512 GB
5960 Points ∼60% -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5033 Points ∼51% -28%
PCMark 10 Score
5969 points
Help

DPC-Latency

我们的标准化延迟测试显示了一些问题,P1 G4不适合实时音频应用。4K视频播放(YouTube)也导致一些掉帧。我们希望联想能在即将到来的BIOS更新中解决这些问题。

LatencyMon概述
LatencyMon概述
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2032.5 μs * ∼100%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
1508 μs * ∼74% +26%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
559.6 μs * ∼28% +72%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的测试装置有两个M.2-2280插槽。
我们的测试装置有两个M.2-2280插槽。

我们已经提到,我们采用传统冷却方案的测试装置有两个M.2-2280插槽(1个PCIe 4.0 x3,1个PCIe 3.0 x4),而采用蒸汽室冷却的型号只有一个插槽(PCIe 4.0 x4)。

我们的测试装置配备了三星PM9A1(980 Pro的OEM版本),存储容量为512GB(初始设置后有429GB可供免费使用)。传输速率非常好,高达6GB/s。更多的SSD基准测试可在我们的 技术部分.

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
Dell Precision 5540
SK hynix PC400 512 GB
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Apple SSD AP1024 7171
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-54%
-50%
-42%
-35%
-39%
-11%
Write 4K
224.15
98
-56%
55.54
-75%
110.5
-51%
158.1
-29%
162.2
-28%
205 ?(137 - 237, n=8)
-9%
Read 4K
88.54
41.25
-53%
16.21
-82%
51.75
-42%
49.09
-45%
43.71
-51%
81.7 ?(47.3 - 91.6, n=8)
-8%
Write Seq
1295
1959.24
2071
2830
2441
3116 ?(1150 - 4216, n=7)
Read Seq
1441
1762.83
2505
2531
1753
3257 ?(1249 - 4543, n=7)
Write 4K Q32T1
663.57
429.2
-35%
398.51
-40%
429.8
-35%
453.4
-32%
397.6
-40%
546 ?(321 - 667, n=8)
-18%
Read 4K Q32T1
720.11
400.1
-44%
648.05
-10%
418.3
-42%
572.5
-20%
519.7
-28%
598 ?(293 - 728, n=8)
-17%
Write Seq Q32T1
5089.4
1366
-73%
2726.7
-46%
3060
-40%
3088
-39%
2519
-51%
3789 ?(1148 - 5089, n=8)
-26%
Read Seq Q32T1
6087.5
2201
-64%
3241.6
-47%
3539
-42%
3394
-44%
3448
-43%
5659 ?(1770 - 6822, n=8)
-7%
Write 4K Q8T8
2021.02
1381.4
-32%
2021
0%
Read 4K Q8T8
2327.96
1371.1
-41%
2328
0%
AS SSD
-67%
-73%
-43%
-20%
-33%
-10%
Seq Read
5505
1742.71
-68%
2531.3
-54%
2953.49
-46%
2986
-46%
2980.03
-46%
4745 ?(2629 - 5533, n=8)
-14%
Seq Write
3908
929.99
-76%
2288.6
-41%
1690.74
-57%
2426
-38%
2093.83
-46%
3086 ?(1270 - 3920, n=8)
-21%
4K Read
54.41
39.1
-28%
15.85
-71%
43.98
-19%
45.93
-16%
45.05
-17%
66.2 ?(46.6 - 81, n=8)
22%
4K Write
146.06
92.08
-37%
39.88
-73%
105.45
-28%
152.25
4%
155.44
6%
179 ?(146 - 214, n=8)
23%
4K-64 Read
2355.73
956.22
-59%
1266.78
-46%
1065.05
-55%
1683.24
-29%
1290.93
-45%
1834 ?(959 - 2489, n=8)
-22%
4K-64 Write
3300.41
862.73
-74%
1748.84
-47%
1957.38
-41%
2009.7
-39%
1506.25
-54%
2373 ?(1257 - 3480, n=8)
-28%
Access Time Read *
0.035
0.074
-111%
0.122
-249%
0.04
-14%
0.045
-29%
0.064
-83%
0.0478 ?(0.034 - 0.078, n=8)
-37%
Access Time Write *
0.029
0.053
-83%
0.095
-228%
0.105
-262%
0.025
14%
0.024
17%
0.0289 ?(0.021 - 0.06, n=8)
-0%
Score Read
2961
1170
-60%
1536
-48%
1404
-53%
2028
-32%
1634
-45%
2375 ?(1360 - 3089, n=8)
-20%
Score Write
3837
1048
-73%
2018
-47%
2232
-42%
2405
-37%
1871
-51%
2735 ?(1567 - 4036, n=8)
-29%
Score Total
8226
2781
-66%
4317
-48%
4297
-48%
5441
-34%
4300
-48%
6373 ?(3573 - 8620, n=8)
-23%
Copy ISO MB/s
2287.45
1995
-13%
2473.57
8%
2256.08
-1%
2014.86
-12%
2286 ?(1430 - 3190, n=4)
0%
Copy Program MB/s
757.23
584
-23%
1073.8
42%
778.61
3%
597.27
-21%
831 ?(757 - 987, n=4)
10%
Copy Game MB/s
1644.49
1135
-31%
1929.44
17%
1626.56
-1%
1449.2
-12%
1642 ?(1177 - 2096, n=4)
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-61% / -62%
-62% / -66%
-43% / -43%
-28% / -25%
-36% / -35%
-11% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6087.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5089.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 720.11 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 663.57 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 88.54 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 224.15 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 2021.02 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2327.96 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0Tooltip

GPU性能 - Nvidia T1200,60瓦特

GPU-Z 英特尔UHD Graphics
GPU-Z 英特尔UHD Graphics
GPU-Z Nvidia T1200
GPU-Z Nvidia T1200

Nvidia的新入门级专业GPU被称为T1200(Quadro的名称不再使用),与更强大的RTX型号相比,不支持光线追踪。联想将该GPU列为Max-Q型号,但Nvidia已不再使用Max-Q。该GPU基于图灵TU117芯片,所以它与消费版GeForce GTX 1650 Ti相当。它在P1 G4中的运行功率为60瓦,这是一个平均值(据Nvidia称35-95瓦是可能的)。我们的基准测试显示最大核心时钟为1840 MHz。

纯粹的性能比消费者的GPU稍好一些GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q在旧的ThinkPad X1 Extreme G3而且也明显领先于老款Quadro T1000/T2000。下一个专业GPU,即新的RTX A2000,明显更快。我们的专业SPECviewperf测试表明,新的T1200和它在某些情况下甚至相当接近RTX A2000。总而言之,Nvidia的新入门级GPU的性能很好。

在持续的工作负荷下,性能也很稳定,该设备轻松通过了苛刻的Time Spy 压力测试(98.2%)。TGP在电池电量上从60瓦特减少到35瓦特,这导致合成基准测试中的性能赤字约为15%。更多的GPU基准测试可在 这里.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
28908 Points ∼100% +98%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
24689 Points ∼85% +69%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
19437 Points ∼67% +33%
Average of class Workstation
  (4110 - 32999, n=40, last 2 years)
17689 Points ∼61% +21%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
14725 Points ∼51% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
14614 Points ∼51%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
14614 Points ∼51% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3-20TLS0UV00
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
12275 Points ∼42% -16%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
11468 Points ∼40% -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
10407 Points ∼36% -29%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
21399 Points ∼100% +108%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
17855 Points ∼83% +74%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
14627 Points ∼68% +42%
Average of class Workstation
  (3169 - 24354, n=39, last 2 years)
13273 Points ∼62% +29%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
10399 Points ∼49% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
10266 Points ∼48%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
10266 Points ∼48% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3-20TLS0UV00
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
9105 Points ∼43% -11%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
8107 Points ∼38% -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
7558 Points ∼35% -26%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
7909 Points ∼100% +117%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
7361 Points ∼93% +102%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
5590 Points ∼71% +53%
Average of class Workstation
  (988 - 9956, n=40, last 2 years)
4998 Points ∼63% +37%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
3651 Points ∼46%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
3651 Points ∼46% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
3364 Points ∼43% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3-20TLS0UV00
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
3332 Points ∼42% -9%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
3066 Points ∼39% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
2834 Points ∼36% -22%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
138.98 fps ∼100% +6%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
131 fps ∼94% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
130.66 fps ∼94%
Average of class Workstation
  (57.3 - 204, n=37, last 2 years)
111 fps ∼80% -15%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
97.2 fps ∼70% -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
92.3 fps ∼66% -29%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
92.28 fps ∼66% -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
89.18 fps ∼64% -32%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
185.47 fps ∼100% +8%
Average of class Workstation
  (18.9 - 465, n=37, last 2 years)
175 fps ∼94% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
171.07 fps ∼92%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
171 fps ∼92% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
157 fps ∼85% -8%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
143.82 fps ∼78% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
127.83 fps ∼69% -25%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
18.89 fps ∼10% -89%
Showcase (showcase-02)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
100.27 fps ∼100% +94%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
69.51 fps ∼69% +34%
Average of class Workstation
  (13.7 - 127, n=36, last 2 years)
63.8 fps ∼64% +23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
62.4 fps ∼62% +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
51.81 fps ∼52%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
51.8 fps ∼52% 0%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
37.56 fps ∼37% -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
35.27 fps ∼35% -32%
Medical (medical-02)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
72.91 fps ∼100% +33%
Average of class Workstation
  (15.8 - 133, n=37, last 2 years)
61.3 fps ∼84% +11%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
56.83 fps ∼78% +3%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
55 fps ∼75% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
54.98 fps ∼75%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
41.71 fps ∼57% -24%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
40.07 fps ∼55% -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
33.45 fps ∼46% -39%
Maya (maya-05)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
200.76 fps ∼100% +50%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
172.04 fps ∼86% +29%
Average of class Workstation
  (40.3 - 341, n=37, last 2 years)
145 fps ∼72% +8%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
134 fps ∼67% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
133.75 fps ∼67%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
126 fps ∼63% -6%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
105.69 fps ∼53% -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
101.04 fps ∼50% -24%
Energy (energy-02)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
33.98 fps ∼100% +75%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.77 - 57.3, n=37, last 2 years)
24.6 fps ∼72% +27%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
21.17 fps ∼62% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
19.41 fps ∼57%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
19.4 fps ∼57% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
17.04 fps ∼50% -12%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
14.87 fps ∼44% -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
12 fps ∼35% -38%
Creo (creo-02)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
170.18 fps ∼100% +23%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
156.79 fps ∼92% +14%
Average of class Workstation
  (35.3 - 320, n=37, last 2 years)
146 fps ∼86% +6%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
138 fps ∼81% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
137.98 fps ∼81%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
109.55 fps ∼64% -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
99.93 fps ∼59% -28%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
93.1 fps ∼55% -33%
Catia (catia-05)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
210.82 fps ∼100% +23%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
172 fps ∼82% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
171.63 fps ∼81%
Average of class Workstation
  (47.5 - 339, n=37, last 2 years)
159 fps ∼75% -7%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
134.64 fps ∼64% -22%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
127.94 fps ∼61% -25%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
125 fps ∼59% -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
121.33 fps ∼58% -29%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
177.3 fps ∼100% +65%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
137.92 fps ∼78% +28%
Average of class Workstation
  (25.3 - 232, n=37, last 2 years)
120 fps ∼68% +12%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
108 fps ∼61% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
107.54 fps ∼61%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
93.32 fps ∼53% -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
89 fps ∼50% -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
83.89 fps ∼47% -22%
SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
126.44 fps ∼100% +37%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
92.3 fps ∼73% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
92.25 fps ∼73%
Average of class Workstation
  (23.2 - 176, n=17, last 2 years)
79.2 fps ∼63% -14%
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
185.98 fps ∼100% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
169.15 fps ∼91%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
169 fps ∼91% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (19.5 - 285, n=17, last 2 years)
123 fps ∼66% -27%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
34.49 fps ∼100% +38%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
25 fps ∼72% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
24.99 fps ∼72%
Average of class Workstation
  (7.5 - 56.9, n=17, last 2 years)
22.7 fps ∼66% -9%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
191.48 fps ∼100% +26%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
151.38 fps ∼79%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
151 fps ∼79% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (46.8 - 258, n=17, last 2 years)
127 fps ∼66% -16%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
33.85 fps ∼100% +74%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
19.5 fps ∼58% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
19.45 fps ∼57%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.77 - 55.1, n=17, last 2 years)
19.2 fps ∼57% -1%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
98.25 fps ∼100% +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
80.1 fps ∼82%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
80.1 fps ∼82% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (23 - 136, n=17, last 2 years)
64.6 fps ∼66% -19%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
59.65 fps ∼100% +44%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
41.42 fps ∼69%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
41.4 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (10.6 - 93.6, n=17, last 2 years)
38.1 fps ∼64% -8%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
59.66 fps ∼100% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
50.11 fps ∼84%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
50.1 fps ∼84% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (11.6 - 120, n=17, last 2 years)
45.3 fps ∼76% -10%
3DMark Vantage P Result
44135 points
3DMark 11 Performance
13779 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
27580 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9255 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3891 points
Help

游戏性能

使用专业驱动程序玩游戏是没有问题的,我们在游戏基准测试中没有发现任何问题。原生的WQHD分辨率通常要求过高,但许多游戏在1080p的高设置下也能顺利运行。我们的Witcher 3 测试也表明,在较长的游戏时间内性能是稳定的。更多的游戏基准测试列在 这里.

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
365.9 (300min - 394max) fps ∼100% +88%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
313 fps ∼86% +61%
Average of class Workstation
  (42.7 - 375, n=34, last 2 years)
220 fps ∼60% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
195 fps ∼53%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
195 fps ∼53% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
156.2 fps ∼43% -20%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
252.2 (225min - 275max) fps ∼100% +99%
Average of class Workstation
  (20.2 - 309, n=33, last 2 years)
157 fps ∼62% +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
127 fps ∼50%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
127 fps ∼50% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
94.1 fps ∼37% -26%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
154.2 (135min - 171max) fps ∼100% +114%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
132 fps ∼86% +83%
Average of class Workstation
  (18.7 - 199, n=32, last 2 years)
98.5 fps ∼64% +37%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
72 fps ∼47%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
72 fps ∼47% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
68 (61min - 76max) fps ∼44% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
52.7 fps ∼34% -27%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
81.5 (72min - 87max) fps ∼100% +114%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G2 ACH
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
73 fps ∼90% +92%
Average of class Workstation
  (10.8 - 110, n=37, last 2 years)
56.6 fps ∼69% +49%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
38.8 (34min - 43max) fps ∼48% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
38 (35min, 35P1 - 40max) fps ∼47%
Average NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
 
38 fps ∼47% 0%
Dell Precision 5540
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
32.4 (30min, 31P1 - 34max) fps ∼40% -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
30.9 (28min, 28P1 - 32max) fps ∼38% -19%
CPU和GPU数据Witcher 3
CPU和GPU数据Witcher 3

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

05101520253035383838383938393938393839383938393938393938393838393838383938393938383838383938383938393838393838383939393938393839383838383739383838383839383838393939383838383838383838383839383838383838393838383838393838383838393838383738383838383838383939383939383838393738383838383838383838373838383838373838383839383939383839373838373838373838373838383838383738383738373837383837383738373838373837383737383837383738383738383937373837373838373837383738383738383738373838373837383738373738373738373837373837373837373837373738373737383737373738373737373737373837373738373737373837373838373737373738373737373837373837373738363837383738383837383737373737373737373737373737373737373737373737363737373737363737373737363737373737373737383738373738373637373737373737373836373637363737373737363737363737363736373637373736373637363737373637363736373737373737373737363637363736373636373637363736373637373636373837373737373737363637363736373637363636373636363637363636363637363636363636373737363737363736363636373537363636373736353636363636363636363636363636353636363636373637363736363636363635363636363636353636363636363536363636363636353636363636363536363636363637363736363736363536363536363636363636363635363636363636353636363635363637363736373637363536363636363636353636363637363635363635363636353636363636353636363636363636363636363635363636363636373636353636363635363636363636373636363536363636363636353636363636363636363536363636363636353636363636363636353636363636353736373637363736353636363636363636363636363636363536363636373636373636353636373635373636363636363636363637363636363636373637373737373837373637363736373736373637373736373736373737363737363736373736373737363737363737373737373737363737373737363737363737363737373736363736373737373736373736373737363737373736373737373638363738373737373837373737373736383738373737373737373837373737373737383737373837373738383837383837383737373838383737373737373737373837373737383737373737373737373837373737383838373737373737373737373837373738373837383737373837373738