总结——新处理器,老外观,熟悉的性能
IdeaPad Slim 3 15 的最大亮点无疑是全新的英特尔 Core 7 350 处理器,专为入门级或低功耗系统设计。不过,这个新名称并未带来什么令人兴奋之处,因为其整体性能仍与传统的 U 系列处理器(如 Core i7-1355U)相当,而非更令人印象深刻的 Lunar Lake-V 系列。 与旧款 U 系列处理器相比,其能效确实有所提升,特别是在空闲状态或运行 GPU 密集型任务时,但除此之外,Wildcat Lake 并未带来任何惊喜。
至于机身设计,2026款 IdeaPad Slim 3 15 与 2025款 相比,外观上没有任何变化,这意味着除了处理器升级之外,两者并无显著差异。虽然我们并不期待一款售价不到1000美元的入门级笔记本会采用奢华的金属材质或独特的设计,但像全新设计的戴尔14S或 MacBook Neo 等竞品正不断提升用户对平价笔记本的期待,而新款IdeaPad Slim 3 15在这方面却有些落后。
Pros
Cons
价格与供货情况
截至发稿时,该产品的价格和上市时间尚未公布,但预计 IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 的起售价将远低于 1000 美元。
2026款 IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11(或称 IdeaPad Slim 3 15 第11代)是首批搭载英特尔 Wildcat Lake 平台的笔记本电脑之一。 它将去年 2025 款 IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R 上的 Raptor Lake 处理器选项替换为 Wildcat Lake,同时保留了相同的外部机身设计。因此,我们此前关于 针对2025款机型的现有评价 的评价依然适用。
我们测试的机型是中端配置,搭载 Core 7 350 处理器和 1200p IPS 触控屏,售价约为 1000 美元。 入门级配置搭载Core 3 304处理器且不支持触控,而高端配置则配备1600p非触控OLED显示屏。
同类竞品还包括其他高性价比笔记本,如戴尔14S或16S系列, 惠普Pavilion 系列,或是更小巧的 MacBook Neo。
更多联想评测:
技术规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
2026款 IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 保留了 2025 款的所有物理特性,甚至包括那个已经过时的圆柱形交流电源充电接口。
连接性
SD卡读卡器
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
沟通
为了降低成本,我们的测试机型不支持 Wi-Fi 6E 或 Wi-Fi 7。不过,可通过升级支持最高至 Wi-Fi 7。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
网络摄像头
虽然我们测试的这款设备标配的是100万像素网络摄像头,但某些配置可能提供500万像素的摄像头,以获得更清晰的图像。

维护
配件与保修
除了圆柱形交流适配器和说明书外,包装盒内没有其他配件。本产品享有常规的一年有限保修。
显示
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 423.1 cd/m²
Contrast: 2489:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.23 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}
calibrated: 1.09
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
72% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
72.3% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
CCT: 6889 K
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 BOE NE153WU0-M60, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.3", 120 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R LEN153WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.3", 60 Hz | Dell 15 D15260 AUO B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | LG Gram 15U55T LG Philips LP156WFD-SPR1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES AU Optronics AUO499F B156HTN06.1, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB IPS, 2408x1506, 13", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -39% | -43% | -46% | -44% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 72.3 | 42.9 -41% | 39.4 -46% | 37.9 -48% | 38.9 -46% | 72.2 0% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.3 | 61.2 -38% | 58.9 -41% | 56.9 -43% | 58 -42% | 97.9 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 72 | 44.4 -38% | 40.7 -43% | 39.1 -46% | 40.2 -44% | 72.6 1% |
| Response Times | 30% | 25% | 14% | 33% | 50% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 41.8 ? | 29.1 ? 30% | 34.14 ? 18% | 34 ? 19% | 40 ? 4% | 20.8 ? 50% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 29 ? | 20.2 ? 30% | 20.08 ? 31% | 26.6 ? 8% | 10.9 ? 62% | 14.6 ? 50% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | ||||||
| Screen | -97% | -53% | -140% | -124% | -4% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 423.1 | 328.3 -22% | 360 -15% | 305.2 -28% | 276 -35% | 548 30% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 404 | 313 -23% | 357 -12% | 304 -25% | 241 -40% | 519 28% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 93 | 92 -1% | 95 2% | 86 -8% | 80 -14% | 91 -2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.17 | 0.24 -41% | 0.25 -47% | 0.72 -324% | 0.92 -441% | 0.48 -182% |
| Contrast (:1) | 2489 | 1368 -45% | 1440 -42% | 424 -83% | 300 -88% | 1142 -54% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.23 | 5.64 -153% | 4.13 -85% | 6.78 -204% | 1.4 37% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.58 | 19.24 -437% | 6.42 -79% | 16.91 -372% | 3.1 13% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.09 | 3.13 -187% | 3.45 -217% | 2.73 -150% | 0.4 63% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 2.1 32% | 2.6 16% | 5.2 -68% | 2.1 32% | |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.12 104% | 2.34 94% | 2.19 100% | 2.24 98% | |
| CCT | 6889 94% | 6757 96% | 6943 94% | 6197 105% | 6870 95% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -35% /
-67% | -24% /
-40% | -57% /
-98% | -45% /
-68% | 15% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.5 ms rise | |
| ↘ 12.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise | |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7781 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为“性能”模式。
处理器性能
该 Core 7 350 的性能大致与能效较低的 Core 5 210H 或三年前的 Core i7-1355U的性能大致相当。的性能大致相当。尽管其型号名称中没有“U”字样,但其运行表现仍与传统的U系列处理器非常相似。
Cinebench R15 多循环测试
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench 2024: CPU Single Core | CPU Multi Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB -14! | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 | |
| MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Aspire Vero AV15-53P -2! | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| HP 250 G9 7N029ES -2! | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES -2! | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Acer Aspire Vero AV15-53P | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| HP 250 G9 7N029ES | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Vero AV15-53P | |
| MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
| HP 250 G9 7N029ES | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Acer Aspire Vero AV15-53P | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| HP 250 G9 7N029ES | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Aspire Vero AV15-53P | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
| HP 250 G9 7N029ES | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Aspire Vero AV15-53P | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| HP 250 G9 7N029ES | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Aspire Vero AV15-53P | |
| HP 250 G9 7N029ES | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Vero AV15-53P | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
| HP 250 G9 7N029ES | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| HP 250 G9 7N029ES | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Aspire Vero AV15-53P | |
| MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| HP 250 G9 7N029ES | |
| HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Aspire Vero AV15-53P | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| MSI Cubi NUC 1M | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Dell 15 D15260 -1! | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R -1! | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 -1! | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 -1! | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Dell 15 D15260 (v8.20.8100) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES (v8.20.8100) | |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Quantized GPU 1.7 | Half Precision GPU 1.7 | Single Precision GPU 1.7
| Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB -4! | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R -7! | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Geekbench AI / Quantized GPU 1.7 | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| Geekbench AI / Half Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| Geekbench AI / Single Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6733 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 350 (n=1) | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
* ... smaller is better
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速:DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
GPU性能
集成显卡的原始GPU性能 Graphics 2 Xe3 的原始GPU性能与 Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 相当,但其每瓦性能更高,效率更佳。
预计搭载相同Wildcat Lake处理器的其他系统,在配备双通道内存时,图形性能将更强。
| 功耗配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理运算得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式 | 3642 | 17604 | 1292 |
| 平衡模式 | 3505 (-4%) | 17533 (-0%) | 1248 (-0%) |
| 电池电量 | 3565 (-2%) | 17607 (-0%) | 1286 (-0%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4159 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 18182 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3426 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1576 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Dell 15 D15260 -1! | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB -5! | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R -2! | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES -5! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Dell 15 D15260 | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES | |
| F1 24 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 | |
| Average Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| LG Gram 15U55T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
《赛博朋克2077》超高清帧率图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 106.1 | 98.1 | 27.2 | 10.5 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 99.2 | 75.6 | 34.9 | 32.8 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 39.4 | 20.3 | 15.2 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 32.6 | 26.2 | 17.8 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 92 | 36.8 | 29.1 | 25.5 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 17.1 | 13.9 | 12 | 11.8 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 20.6 | 15.3 | 13 | 10.8 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 36.6 | 32.3 | 25.2 | 17.2 |
排放
系统噪音
与去年的机型相比,该系统能够更长时间地保持较低的运行噪音。不过,在长时间运行高负载任务时,其最低噪音水平仍维持在40 dB(A)左右。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23.8 / 23.8 / 23.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 25.8 / 43.8 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R Core 5 210H, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | Dell 15 D15260 Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T | LG Gram 15U55T Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES Athlon 7120U, Radeon 610M | Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB A18 Pro, A18 GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -15% | -22% | 8% | -10% | ||
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.7 | 27.3 -15% | 25.5 -8% | 24.8 -5% | 25.9 -9% | |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.8 | 27.3 -15% | 27.6 -16% | 24.8 -4% | 25.9 -9% | |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 23.8 | 27.3 -15% | 27.6 -16% | 24.8 -4% | 25.9 -9% | |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 23.8 | 29 -22% | 27.6 -16% | 24.8 -4% | 25.9 -9% | |
| Load Average * (dB) | 25.8 | 42 -63% | 47.2 -83% | 25.6 1% | 33.5 -30% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 43.8 | 35.1 20% | 47.5 -8% | 28 36% | ||
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 43.8 | 41.5 5% | 47.4 -8% | 28.1 36% | 40.3 8% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 22.8 °C / 73 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+5.9 °C / 10.7 F).
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R Core 5 210H, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | Dell 15 D15260 Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T | LG Gram 15U55T Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES Athlon 7120U, Radeon 610M | Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB A18 Pro, A18 GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 1% | -6% | 10% | -5% | 7% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 33.2 | 34.2 -3% | 37.6 -13% | 35.4 -7% | 41 -23% | 40.8 -23% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 36 | 38.8 -8% | 45.2 -26% | 43.4 -21% | 43 -19% | 38 -6% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 30.6 | 28.6 7% | 29.4 4% | 21 31% | 28 8% | 23.8 22% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 34.6 | 31.4 9% | 30.6 12% | 22.6 35% | 29 16% | 22.8 34% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
| 平均 CPU 时钟频率 (GHz) | GPU 时钟频率 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | |
| 系统空闲状态 | -- | -- | 39 |
| Prime95 压力测试 | 3.2 | -- | 82 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力测试 | 3.2 | 2600 | 74 |
| 《赛博朋克2077》压力测试 | 1.5 | 2600 | 77 |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功耗
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL, , IPS, 1920x1200, 15.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R Core 5 210H, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.3" | Dell 15 D15260 Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T, Kioxia EG6 1024GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | LG Gram 15U55T Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES Athlon 7120U, Radeon 610M, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X108N, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB A18 Pro, A18 GPU, Apple SSD AP0256Z, IPS, 2408x1506, 13" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -46% | -14% | -12% | 29% | 33% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 2.7 | 6.7 -148% | 3.58 -33% | 4 -48% | 2.2 19% | 1.5 44% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 7 | 10.1 -44% | 7.19 -3% | 8.3 -19% | 5.2 26% | 8.9 -27% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 7.1 | 10.2 -44% | 8.89 -25% | 8.5 -20% | 5.7 20% | 9 -27% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 35.2 | 52.6 -49% | 42.1 -20% | 37.9 -8% | 22 37% | 18.9 46% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 33.8 | 36.9 -9% | 34.8 -3% | 32.4 4% | 10.3 70% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 38.1 | 40.2 -6% | 37.4 2% | 36.3 5% | 11.5 70% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 56.3 | 69.5 -23% | 65.9 -17% | 56.7 -1% | 32.8 42% | 26.3 53% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗测试:《赛博朋克》/压力测试
外部显示器的功耗
电池续航时间
部分配置提供密度更高的 60 Wh 电池组(而非 50 Wh),以延长续航时间。
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 Core 7 350, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 WCL, 50 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R Core 5 210H, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 60 Wh | Dell 15 D15260 Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T, 41 Wh | LG Gram 15U55T Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), 51 Wh | HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES Athlon 7120U, Radeon 610M, 41.04 Wh | Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB A18 Pro, A18 GPU, 36.5 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 45% | -21% | -15% | -28% | 10% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 11.7 | 17 45% | 9.2 -21% | 10 -15% | 8.4 -28% | 12.9 10% |
| H.264 (h) | 13.6 | |||||
| Load (h) | 2.8 |
Notebookcheck 评分
Wildcat Lake 处理器虽属新品,但性能平平;而旧款机身设计确实亟需升级,才能在与其他售价低于 1000 美元的笔记本电脑的竞争中保持竞争力。
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11
- 06/29/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11 Intel Core 7 350 ⎘ Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: | 1.3 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.30" 1920x1200 148 PPI IPS | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R Intel Core 5 210H ⎘ Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 770 USD | 1.7 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.30" 1920x1200 148 PPI IPS | |
| Dell 15 D15260 Intel Core Ultra 5 225H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130T ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $999.00 Dell 15 Laptop D15260-15.6-i... 2. $994.98 Dell 15 Laptop D15260-15.6-i... 3. $499.99 Dell Inspiron 15 DC15250 15.... List Price: 740 USD | 1.7 kg | 18.99 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| LG Gram 15U55T Intel Core Ultra 7 255U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 800 USD | 1.6 kg | 19.3 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| HP 255 G10 C07Q0ES AMD Athlon Silver 7120U ⎘ AMD Radeon 610M ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $806.72 HP 255 G10 AMD Athlon Silver... 2. $54.50 LCDBros Screen for HP 255 G1... 3. $54.00 LCDBros Screen for HP 255 G1... List Price: 482 Euro | 1.6 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI TN | |
| Apple MacBook Neo 256 GB Apple A18 Pro ⎘ Apple A18 GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 699€ | 1.2 kg | 12.7 mm | 13.00" 2408x1506 218 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.









































































