判决
仅就制造质量而言，IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 就给人留下了坚实到非常坚实的印象。输入设备令人信服，机箱质量和整体设计都很出色。虽然联想至少保留了一个 microSD 读卡器，但端口的选择并不特别新颖，而现在许多制造商已经完全取消了这一功能。16:10 显示屏让我们喜忧参半。对于 IPS 面板来说，对比度是完全值得尊敬的，但色域却令人失望，这尤其影响了照片和视频的播放。Ryzen AI 5 330，或者更准确地说，集成的 Radeon 820M 的性能也让我们有些失望。规格说明清楚地表明，该配置并非专为高性能而设计，但在某些情况下，价格相近或仅略高于该配置的竞争笔记本电脑却明显领先（稍后详述）。
16 英寸机型的市场售价约为 700 欧元，如果性能不是主要考虑因素，它仍然是一个有趣的选择。如果更看重制造质量、散热性能和电池续航时间，联想的这一配置肯定能在这些方面取得不错的成绩。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 在德国的售价约为 700 欧元起（例如在Cyberport).在美国，同类配置的起价约为 840 美元至 880 美元，具体取决于零售商和规格。价格以撰写本文时为准，可能因地区、配置和零售商而异。
- $697.00Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Laptop: 16" FHD+ Touch, Ryzen AI 7 350 (8-Core) Processor 16" 1920x1200 Touchscreen 16GB DDR5 1TB M.2 TLC Solid State Drive
- $579.00Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5, 16" WUXGA IPS Laptop, 10-Core Intel Core 5 120U, 16GB LPDDR5x RAM, 1TB M.2 NVMe PCIe SSD, Backlit KB, Fingerprint, Wi-Fi 6, BT5.2, Windows 11 Home, Cloud Gray, EAT Mouse Pad
作为本次评测的对比设备，我们选择了 Yoga 7 二合一 14(Ryzen AI 5 340 和 Radeon 840M），以及 IdeaPad 5 2 合 1 14(Ryzen AI 7 350，Radeon 860M）和 IdeaPad 5 二合一 16(Core Ultra 7 255U，Arc Graphics 4-Core），售价均低于 1000 欧元。虽然这些都是可转换设备，但我们在此主要关注 CPU 和 iGPU 的比较。基于酷睿 7 150U 和 Iris Xe Graphics G7 的 "老款 "Slim 5 16 也出现在我们的比较表中。
规格
底盘
光滑而低调的铝制机身给人留下深刻印象，质感上乘，坚固耐用。相当坚固的铰链可将显示屏牢牢固定，约 160 度的开启角度也非常可观。16 英寸机型的重量略低于 1.9 千克，与英特尔版本一致，而可折叠机型则重了近 0.2 千克。
连接性
左侧有两个 USB-C 3.1 Gen 2 端口，支持 DisplayPort 1.4 和 PowerDelivery，还有一个 HDMI 输出和一个组合音频插孔。右侧有一个速度相当快的 microSD 读卡器和两个传统的 USB-A 3.0 端口。笔记本电脑没有配备以太网端口，但配备了速度极快的 Wi-Fi 7 模块。网络摄像头包括隐私快门，分辨率仅为 0.9 百万像素，但仍能生成比许多同类机型更清晰的图像。拧开六颗 Torx 螺钉后，底盖很容易取下。内部有两个 SO-DIMM 插槽和两个 M.2 插槽。2280 插槽是空闲的，而安装的固态硬盘位于较小的 2242 插槽中。
SD 读卡器
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Office (22.4 - 198.5, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE (AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE (AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=27, last 2 years) | |
交流
网络摄像头
维护
输入设备
输入设备非常稳固，典型的联想风格，略高于同类产品的平均水平，但并不出类拔萃。除了窄小的上下方向键外，布局基本令人满意。键入手感良好，白色背光可确保在弱光环境下清晰可见。触摸板的尺寸为 12 x 7.5 厘米，提供了足够的空间。触控板的滑动特性、手势识别和精确度几乎无可挑剔。只有点击机构听起来有点嘎嘎作响。
显示屏
遗憾的是，联想在显示屏上有些偷工减料。尽管对比度略低于 1,060:1，但大约 58% 的 sRGB 覆盖率导致图像相当暗淡。这里肯定还有改进的余地。如我们的表格所示，响应时间也可以更好，特别是与 OLED 面板相比，后者的黑阶也要好得多。积极的一面是，Slim 5 16 没有出现 PWM 闪烁。对于一款 16 英寸设备来说，1920 x 1200 像素的分辨率在清晰度方面并不理想，但总体来说还是可以接受的。我们测试设备的平均亮度为 332 cd/m²，虽然并不出众，但还算可用。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 349 cd/m²
Contrast: 1058:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.57 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
calibrated: 4.52
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
40.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
57.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
39.1% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.129
CCT: 6656 K
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 Lenovo LEN160WUM, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 Lenovo LEN140WUXGA, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE LEN140WUXGA , OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 124% | 123% | 5% | 6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 39.1 | 98.5 152% | 99.5 154% | 40.9 5% | 41.5 6% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 57.6 | 100 74% | 100 74% | 60.4 5% | 61.2 6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 40.4 | 99.9 147% | 97.5 141% | 42.5 5% | 42.9 6% |
| Response Times | 94% | 86% | 21% | 31% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 31.9 ? | 1.5 ? 95% | 2.72 ? 91% | 24.3 ? 24% | 20.7 ? 35% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 20.6 ? | 1.4 ? 93% | 3.9 ? 81% | 16.9 ? 18% | 15.1 ? 27% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 240 ? | 480 ? | |||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 20 | 9.5 | |||
| Screen | 3810% | 413% | -13% | -28% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 349 | 360 3% | 382 9% | 325.4 -7% | 313.3 -10% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 332 | 357 8% | 384 16% | 312 -6% | 308 -7% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 91 | 97 7% | 98 8% | 90 -1% | 91 0% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.33 | 0.001 100% | 0.01 97% | 0.26 21% | 0.37 -12% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1058 | 360000 33926% | 38200 3511% | 1252 18% | 847 -20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.57 | 2.12 62% | 4.7 16% | 7.35 -32% | 8.42 -51% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.96 | 4.59 77% | 8.9 55% | 25.37 -27% | 19.09 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.52 | 1.9 58% | 4.8 -6% | 2.75 39% | 2.16 52% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 1.4 48% | 2.3 15% | 6 -122% | 8.3 -207% |
| Gamma | 2.129 103% | 2.187 101% | 2.1 105% | 2.27 97% | 2.83 78% |
| CCT | 6656 98% | 6366 102% | 6400 102% | 5735 113% | 6296 103% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1343% /
2489% | 207% /
304% | 4% /
-4% | 3% /
-12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 31.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8152 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
在性能方面，IdeaPad 稳居入门级产品行列，这与其价格相符。我们的测试配置包括 16 GB DDR5-5600 内存（2x 8 GB）和 512 GB NVMe 固态硬盘。由于存储和内存都可以更换，因此未来的升级非常简单。
测试条件
联想 Vantage 软件提供三种运行模式。电池保护模式能明显降低风扇噪音，而自适应自动模式（用于我们的测量）和性能模式几乎没有实际差别。
| 模式 | 省电模式 | 自适应（自动） | 性能 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》噪音 | 32 dB(A) | 42 dB(A) | 42 dB(A) |
| 赛博朋克 2077》帧速率（FHD/超高清） | 5.1 fps | 6.4 fps | 5.5 fps |
| CPU PL1 | 25 W | 30 W | 36 W |
| CPU PL2 | 40 W | 40 W | 51 W |
| Cinebench R15 Multi 分数 | 963 分 | 1186 分 | 1195 分 |
处理器
......（英文 Ryzen AI 5 330Ryzen AI 5 330 属于 Krackan Point 2 代产品，配备 4 个 Zen 5 内核（4 纳米），可同时处理 8 个线程。在我们的 CPU 基准测试中，AI 5 330 不仅落后于其同胞兄弟 AI 5 340，而且还落后于 Ryzen AI 5 330。 AI 5 340和 人工智能 7 350在我们的 CPU 基准测试中，AI 5 330 不仅落后于其同类产品 AI 5 340 和 AI 7 350 酷睿至尊 7 255U甚至 酷睿 7 150U甚至是之前测试的 IdeaPad Slim 5 16 中的酷睿 7 150U。不过，如 Cinebench 循环所示，AMD 机型的整体性能更为稳定。
Cinebench R15 多连续测试
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (1685 - 31245, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average of class Office (8977 - 125394, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average of class Office (590 - 5755, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Office (20636 - 115197, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average of class Office (1064 - 18321, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average of class Office (4415 - 66922, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average of class Office (138.6 - 1366, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (859 - 17834, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (11090 - 65229, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
系统性能
系统性能在我们的比较中也处于下风，不过应该指出的是，同类机型的价格一般要高出几百欧元。不过，对于日常办公、视频和网络任务来说，整体体验还是绰绰有余的。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 -1! | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330, AMD Radeon 820M | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Office (2823 - 7735, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330, AMD Radeon 820M (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Average of class Office (6567 - 11594, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330, AMD Radeon 820M (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330, AMD Radeon 820M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Office (3041 - 10925, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Average of class Office (2049 - 12660, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330, AMD Radeon 820M (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Average of class Office (348 - 2010, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330, AMD Radeon 820M (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average of class Office (393 - 1880, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330, AMD Radeon 820M (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Office (319 - 2361, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330, AMD Radeon 820M (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average of class Office (258 - 1877, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330, AMD Radeon 820M (n=1) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330, AMD Radeon 820M (n=1) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330, AMD Radeon 820M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (391 - 1966, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 5589 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Average of class Office (20075 - 109192, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average of class Office (10084 - 128030, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Office (20073 - 117989, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Office (7.6 - 162.9, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
这里列出的所有联想笔记本电脑在延迟方面都表现不佳。不过，这并不罕见，因为其他制造商的许多设备也有类似表现。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储
与竞争对手相比，我们测试设备中安装的西部数据 512 GB 固态硬盘也有些吃力，与 CPU 和系统的性能结果如出一辙。在 DiskSpd 循环中，我们观察到了轻微的性能波动或一段时间后的性能下降，但其严重程度仍然有限。
* ... smaller is better
连续读取性能：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
Ryzen AI 5 330 使用集成的 Radeon 820M是 Zen 5 代的绝对入门级产品。它只有 128 个着色器，远远落后于 Radeon 840M(256着色器）和 Radeon 860M(512着色器）。甚至与 Radeon 880M(768着色器）或 Radeon 890M(1,024着色器）进行比较也没有什么意义。与英特尔的竞争也相当惨烈。两款 Iris Xe Graphics G7 和基于 Arc 的 图形 4 核在 3DMark 基准测试中均领先 60% 以上。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 23777 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 13640 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4284 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 139120 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 17905 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2981 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 900 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
毫不奇怪，Radeon 820M 几乎不适合玩游戏。现代游戏几乎是禁区，即使在最低设置下也会很快变得卡顿。一些要求不高的老游戏（如 多塔 2在最好的情况下，甚至在较高的设置下也能流畅运行。不过，我们认为，如果有人时不时想玩一些简单的浏览器游戏之外的游戏，至少应该选择配备 Radeon 860M 的设备。后者在 3D 应用程序中的性能是前者的两倍多。
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Average of class Office (6.13 - 29.6, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average of class Office (3.98 - 47.8, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Average of class Office (6.45 - 36.5, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Average of class Office (12.9 - 62, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Office (13.4 - 121.2, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 130.3 | 107.5 | 22.5 | 8.85 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 130 | 91.1 | 45.2 | 40.4 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 31 | 13.7 | 10 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 38.5 | 26.9 | 24 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 75.9 | 27 | 20.1 | 17.3 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 13.3 | 10.2 | 6.99 | 6.91 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 12.9 | 9.4 | 7.6 | 6.4 |
| Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 10.2 | 8.06 | 5.54 | |
| Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 9.15 | 7.35 | 6.7 | |
| Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 5.47 | 4.6 | 3.21 | |
| Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 3.93 | 3.88 | 3.1 | |
| Space Marine 2 (2024) | 7.5 | 5.87 | 5.55 | |
| Until Dawn (2024) | 16.6 | 9.52 | 5.88 | |
| Stalker 2 (2024) | 5.83 | 4.9 | 3.68 | |
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | ||
| Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 10.8 | 7.85 | 6.39 | |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 6 | 5 | 3 | |
| The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered (2025) | 4.57 | 3.68 | 3.2 | |
| Doom: The Dark Ages (2025) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | |
| F1 25 (2025) | 23 | 17 | 11 | |
| Borderlands 4 (2025) | 4.07 | 3.4 | 2.29 | |
| Battlefield 6 (2025) | 10.6 | 7.85 | 6.22 | |
| The Outer Worlds 2 (2025) | 8.14 | 5.23 | 4.05 | |
| ARC Raiders (2025) | 19.4 | 9.85 | 6.54 |
在 30 分钟的压力测试中 赛博朋克 2077IdeaPad Slim 5 16 的帧速率相当稳定。
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
排放量
噪音排放
对噪音水平的评价不一。虽然 16 英寸机型在空闲时依然安静宜人，风扇也经常完全关闭，但 Slim 5 16 在负载情况下的噪音超过 40 dB(A)，与速度更快的竞争对手相差无几。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24 / 25 / 26 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 43 / 43 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 330, Radeon 820M | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 340, Radeon 840M | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | 3% | 5% | 5% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 25 -4% | 24.8 -3% | 23.1 4% | 23 4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24 | 25 -4% | 24.8 -3% | 23.1 4% | 23 4% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25 | 27 -8% | 24.8 1% | 23.1 8% | 23 8% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 26 | 30 -15% | 24.8 5% | 23.1 11% | 23 12% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 43 | 43 -0% | 41.2 4% | 41.8 3% | 43.3 -1% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 42 | 42 -0% | 35.9 15% | 41.8 -0% | 40.8 3% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 43 | 44 -2% | 43.3 -1% | 41.8 3% | 40.9 5% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在温度方面，IdeaPad 表现出了它最好的一面。在空闲和 3D 负载状态下，它的运行温度明显低于同类产品，必要时可以放在膝上使用。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-1.4 °C / -2.5 F).
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 330, Radeon 820M | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 340, Radeon 840M | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -20% | -24% | -2% | -5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 35 | 47 -34% | 45 -29% | 40.4 -15% | 35.4 -1% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 37 | 49 -32% | 47.5 -28% | 35.6 4% | 33 11% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 26 | 28 -8% | 31.1 -20% | 26 -0% | 30.2 -16% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 27 | 29 -7% | 31.5 -17% | 26 4% | 30.2 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在使用 FurMark 和 Prime95 进行的压力测试中，Ryzen AI 5 330 的温度稳定在 66 ℃ 左右，属于中等水平。
发言人
根据我们的音频分析，音质不如前代产品和英特尔同类产品。没有一个频率范围表现良好，最大音量也同样令人失望。总之，您应该尽可能使用耳机或外置扬声器。
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
正如这款 16 英寸系统所预期的那样，功耗并不高。空闲时约为 5 至 8 瓦，负载时约为 43 至 58 瓦，这对随附的 65 瓦电源适配器来说毫无挑战。
| Off / Standby | 0.5 / 0.8 Watt |
| Idle | 5.2 / 6 / 7.7 Watt |
| Load |
44 / 58 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 330, Radeon 820M | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 340, Radeon 840M | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -6% | -16% | -15% | -6% | -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 5.2 | 4 23% | 5.3 -2% | 4.8 8% | 3.3 37% | 4.53 ? 13% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 6 | 5 17% | 5.6 7% | 8.7 -45% | 7.5 -25% | 7.45 ? -24% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 7.7 | 7 9% | 6.8 12% | 9 -17% | 7.8 -1% | 8.84 ? -15% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 44 | 52 -18% | 56.2 -28% | 47.1 -7% | 56.9 -29% | 41.5 ? 6% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 43 | 54.8 -27% | 54.5 -27% | 48.6 -13% | 48.7 -13% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 40.4 | 52.6 -30% | 65.7 -63% | 45.1 -12% | 41.2 -2% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 58 | 68 -17% | 65.8 -13% | 68.2 -18% | 62.4 -8% | 62.8 ? -8% |
* ... smaller is better
耗电量：赛博朋克/压力测试
带外部监视器时的耗电量
电池寿命
16 英寸机型的运行时间约为 10.5 小时，在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试（在 150 cd/m² 亮度下自动浏览各种网站）中表现出色，令人印象深刻。其 60 Wh 的电池容量与竞争对手一致，竞争对手的电池容量在 57 到 70 Wh 之间。
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 330, Radeon 820M, 60 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 340, Radeon 840M, 70 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 57 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), 57 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 9% | -33% | 18% | 21% | 19% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 10.5 | 11.4 9% | 7 -33% | 12.4 18% | 12.7 21% | 12.5 ? 19% |
| Load (h) | 1.1 | 1.6 | 1.844 ? | |||
| Reader / Idle (h) | 26.1 | 22.3 ? |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
虽然联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 在性能方面有些令人失望，但它的电池续航时间和优质机身却给人留下了更深刻的印象。
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10
- 11/10/2025 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: 替代品一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 80.8%  | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 ⎘ AMD Radeon 820M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $749.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP1... 2. $697.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Laptop... 3. $579.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5, 16" W... List Price: 700 EUR | 1.9 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
2. 84.8%  | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 ⎘ AMD Radeon 840M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $843.98 Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 2025 Co... 2. $23.95 mCover case ONLY Compatible ... 3. $1,169.00 Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 2025 La... List Price: 1000 EUR | 1.4 kg | 16.5 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
3. 83.4%  | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AKP10 83KT0033GE AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $10.99 3 Pack Designed for New 2025... 2. $769.00 Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AK... 3. $879.00 Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14AK... List Price: 999 Euro | 1.5 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
4. 78.8%  | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 Intel Core Ultra 7 255U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: $799.99 | 2.1 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
5. 74.7%  | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $748.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9... 2. $699.99 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9... 3. $19.99 USB C 65W 45W Charger Compat... List Price: 800 USD | 1.8 kg | 16.9 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
