Notebookcheck Logo

总决赛回顾笔记本电脑和台式机基准测试

富有创意的游戏概念。 总决赛》为多人射击游戏带来了一股新鲜空气。我们对这款激动人心的游戏的技术和图形要求进行了分析。
Gaming Laptop / Notebook Desktop Gamecheck

测试系统

华硕 ROG Zephyrus M16(RTX 4090)
华硕 ROG Zephyrus M16(RTX 4090)
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23(RTX 4080)
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23(RTX 4080)
XMG Pro 15 E23(RTX 4070)
XMG Pro 15 E23(RTX 4070)
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23(RTX 4060)
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23(RTX 4060)
Medion Erazer Scout E20(RTX 4050)
Medion Erazer Scout E20(RTX 4050)
华硕 ROG Strix Scar 17(RTX 3080 Ti)
华硕 ROG Strix Scar 17(RTX 3080 Ti)
华硕 TUF Gaming Advantage A16(RX 7600S 和 780M)
华硕 TUF Gaming Advantage A16(RX 7600S 和 780M)
安静静音底座 802(RTX 4080 和 RX 7900 XT)
安静静音底座 802(RTX 4080 和 RX 7900 XT)
飞利浦 Evnia 8000 系列 41.5 英寸 UHD OLED 游戏显示器
飞利浦 Evnia 8000 系列 41.5 英寸 UHD OLED 游戏显示器

我们目前使用这些设备进行游戏基准测试。点击照片可进入相应制造商的网站。有关规格的更多详情,请参阅文章末尾。

技术

尽管它的视觉效果色彩斑斓、对比强烈(让人联想起 镜之边缘和其他游戏一样),但《总决赛》提供了非常出色的画面。底层的虚幻引擎 5 凭借清晰的纹理和出色的特效(火焰、泡沫......)表现出色。一流的反射效果尤其给我们留下了深刻的印象,如果没有动态 RTX 全局光照,这种效果已经非常令人印象深刻了。可破坏环境是另一个亮点和战术特色。

决赛
决赛
决赛
决赛
决赛
决赛

这款 Free2Play 游戏在大多数其他方面也给人留下了深刻印象,无论是音效、动作还是枪法。总的来说,《总决赛》的游戏过程非常流畅,除非出现卡顿等问题。

决赛
决赛
决赛
决赛
决赛
决赛

在图形菜单方面,我们也几乎没有什么可抱怨的。除了分辨率、图像模式和 VSync 等经典功能外,还有各种现代功能,如升频(DLSS、FSR、XeSS)和帧生成。底部有近 10 个画质和细节控制按钮,可通过预设值进行更改,而无需重新启动游戏。与其他一些游戏不同的是,该游戏没有样本图像,但至少有对各个设置的解释。

决赛
决赛

从技术角度来看,《总决赛》给人的印象非常干净利落。虽然游戏启动时间有点长,不符合我们的口味,但它只占用了硬盘大约 17 GB 的空间。

基准

我们使用所谓的 "练习场 "进行速度测量,因为这可以实现恒定、可重现的序列(见视频)。总而言之,《总决赛》对硬件的要求相当适中。由于在正常游戏过程中可能会出现激烈场景(爆炸等)性能下降的情况,我们的基准测试序列(可以说是缓冲区)应至少达到 60 FPS。

成果


全高清(1,920 x 1,080)

虽然 iGPU 在 潘多拉星球的阿凡达前沿测试中 Radeon 780M在运行 "总决赛 "时,至少能满足 1,920 x 1,080 像素和中低细节的要求。中端 GPU 如 GeForce RTX 4050级别的中端 GPU,您在全高清玩游戏时会比较安全,也能充分享受最高设置。

The Finals
    1920x1080 Low Preset     1920x1080 Medium Preset     1920x1080 High Preset     1920x1080 Epic Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
317 (109.6min, 198.1P0.1, 235P1) fps ∼100%
309 (67.9min, 195.9P0.1, 236P1) fps ∼100%
302 (149.3min, 192.3P0.1, 225P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
295 (120.6min, 186.6P0.1, 220P1) fps ∼93%
286 (59.7min, 166.8P0.1, 204P1) fps ∼93%
258 (161.5min, 168.1P0.1, 186.1P1) fps ∼85%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16
193 (52.1min, 59.2P0.1, 103.6P1) fps ∼61%
175.1 (33.8min, 40.2P0.1, 63P1) fps ∼57%
174.1 (31.4min, 42.3P0.1, 67.1P1) fps ∼58%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
175.5 (35.4min, 48.6P0.1, 94.8P1) fps ∼55%
174.8 (28.8min, 55.6P0.1, 110.4P1) fps ∼57%
171.4 (14.4min, 57.6P0.1, 104.1P1) fps ∼57%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
186.6 (25.4min, 97.2P0.1, 131.9P1) fps ∼59%
180.6 (53min, 97.1P0.1, 124.3P1) fps ∼58%
156.7 (76.4min, 100.5P0.1, 114.6P1) fps ∼52%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX
212 (57.1min, 89.8P0.1, 150.1P1) fps ∼67%
190.1 (42.9min, 83.8P0.1, 133.2P1) fps ∼62%
156.4 (45.7min, 67.4P0.1, 112.9P1) fps ∼52%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
176 (72.3min, 95.3P0.1, 127.6P1) fps ∼56%
157.7 (19.9min, 60.1P0.1, 115.6P1) fps ∼51%
126 (38.9min, 73.3P0.1, 93.8P1) fps ∼42%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16
155.9 (82.3min, 102.8P0.1, 114.9P1) fps ∼49%
133.7 (89.2min, 95P0.1, 100P1) fps ∼43%
100.8 (64.2min, 69.5P0.1, 75.1P1) fps ∼33%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
154.7 (72.1min, 84P0.1, 111.7P1) fps ∼49%
133.5 (67min, 74.3P0.1, 95.9P1) fps ∼43%
99.2 (55.1min, 63.8P0.1, 71.7P1) fps ∼33%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16
70.2 (12.9min, 26.8P0.1, 49.6P1) fps ∼100%
51.7 (10.4min, 12.4P0.1, 37.1P1) fps ∼16%
46.8 (10.7min, 13.5P0.1, 34P1) fps ∼15%
30.6 (19.8min, 19.9P0.1, 20.9P1) fps ∼10%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

QHD 显示器也不需要高端组件。从 Radeon RX 7600S在 2,560 x 1,440 像素和 Epic 预设值下,60 FPS 大关已被攻破。

The Finals
    2560x1440 Epic Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
208 (120.6min, 133.8P0.1, 159.1P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
172.4 (112.1min, 124P0.1, 133.3P1) fps ∼83%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16
137.2 (37.2min, 49.8P0.1, 94.2P1) fps ∼66%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
125.5 (42min, 48.9P0.1, 80.6P1) fps ∼60%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX
100.7 (73min, 73.8P0.1, 77.4P1) fps ∼48%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
94.6 (58.2min, 65.2P0.1, 71.9P1) fps ∼45%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
77.7 (56min, 56.9P0.1, 61.2P1) fps ∼37%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16
61.5 (43.5min, 44.4P0.1, 47.7P1) fps ∼30%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
54.6 (35.2min, 35.7P0.1, 40.1P1) fps ∼26%

超高清(3,840 x 2,160)

通常情况下,只有在达到 4K 时,要求才会变得真正苛刻。A GeForce RTX 4080或更高配置才能使用史诗预设。

The Finals
    3840x2160 Epic Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
100.3 (44.6min, 73.7P0.1, 78P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
83 (30.3min, 63.8P0.1, 66.9P1) fps ∼83%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16
67 (17.3min, 37.3P0.1, 50.3P1) fps ∼67%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
60.3 (34.2min, 43.8P0.1, 46.5P1) fps ∼60%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX
47.5 (34.7min, 36P0.1, 38.2P1) fps ∼47%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
42.9 (12.3min, 25P0.1, 33P1) fps ∼43%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
35.6 (27.2min, 27.4P0.1, 28.1P1) fps ∼35%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16
27.6 (21.2min, 21.4P0.1, 21.8P1) fps ∼28%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
27.3 (19.7min, 19.9P0.1, 21.5P1) fps ∼27%

光线追踪与 DLSS

动态全局光照形式的主动光线追踪所耗费的性能少得令人惊讶,与不使用 RTX 的情况相比,在全高清模式下使用相同的 GPU 建议。如果在 4000 代 Nvidia 芯片上开启高质量 DLSS 和帧生成功能,则 RTX 4060就能在 4K 下达到 60 FPS。

The Finals
    1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic RTX Global Illumination     3840x2160 Epic Preset + Epic RTX Global Illumination + Quality DLSS + FG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
267 (119.2min, 169.8P0.1, 204P1) fps ∼100%
162.8 (76.6min, 93.8P0.1, 143P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
236 (57.6min, 144.6P0.1, 172.2P1) fps ∼88%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16
159.8 (40.5min, 63.6P0.1, 107.8P1) fps ∼60%
109.2 (29min, 40.7P0.1, 64P1) fps ∼67%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
158.9 (36.3min, 53.2P0.1, 95P1) fps ∼60%
102.5 (25.7min, 40P0.1, 77.5P1) fps ∼63%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX
143.2 (32.6min, 62P0.1, 103.4P1) fps ∼54%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
142.2 (59.3min, 88.9P0.1, 106.5P1) fps ∼53%
70.5 (53min, 54.7P0.1, 57.8P1) fps ∼43%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
121.1 (60.6min, 76.7P0.1, 91P1) fps ∼45%
60.1 (26min, 34.8P0.1, 47.9P1) fps ∼37%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
96.8 (48.4min, 60.1P0.1, 68.5P1) fps ∼36%
40.6 (29.1min, 30.8P0.1, 33.5P1) fps ∼25%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16
95 (44.4min, 64.4P0.1, 70P1) fps ∼36%

Overview

Show Restrictions
PosModel< PrevNext >The Finals
 The Finals (2023)
low
1920x1080
Low Preset
med.
1920x1080
Medium Preset
high
1920x1080
High Preset
ultra
1920x1080
Epic Preset
QHD
2560x1440
Epic Preset
4K
3840x2160
Epic Preset

3840x2160
Epic Preset + Epic RTX Global Illumination + Quality DLSS + FG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
317n2
288.5n2
278n2
285n2
256.5n2
139.8n2
216n2
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
398
390
384
319
215
109.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super
425.5n2
387n2
384n2
320.5n2
213n2
102.65n2
167.25n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
317
309
302
208
100.3
162.8
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
295
286
258
172.4
83
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
357
332
306
236
148.5
70.8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
228
204.5n2
194.55n2
192.55n2
142.3n2
67
109.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
383.5n2
330.5n2
296.5n2
237n2
155.1n2
77.4n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
188.9
177.4n2
172.75n2
171.4n3
125.5n3
60.3
102.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB
323
279
218
144.7
72.1
AMD Radeon RX 6800
350
261
232
171.7
107.2
49.7
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
347
286
253
189.3
118.9
54.7
NVIDIA Titan RTX
324
250
225
171.5
111.6
55.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
346
271
238
184.8
118.7
57.8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
212
190.1
156.4
100.7
47.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
186.6
174.3n2
143.45n2
88.7n2
42.9
70.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
269
228
174.1
112
53.9
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
318
229
200
147
88.8
39.3
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
298
215
188.9
137.4
84
37.2
PosModel< PrevNext >The Finals
low med. high ultra QHD 4K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
141.3
88.1
42.3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
318
234
206
154.8
96.7
46.3
Intel Arc A770
204
161.7
146.2
121.5
83
40.5
AMD Radeon RX 7600
291
210
186.4
135.6
81.9
35.3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
176
157.7
126
77.7
35.6
60.1
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
269
195
169.6
122.9
73.7
33.4
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
113
69.1
31.3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
222
181.7
160.6
127.2
80.2
37.6
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
147.5
115.3
69.2
Intel Arc A750
189.5
148.8
134.6
109.3
72.1
35.1
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
200
145.2
128.2
97.4
61.4
29.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)
252
183.9
160.6
122.6
75.7
35.1
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)
212
158.2
136.9
98.9
62.2
30.1
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
155.9
133.7
100.8
61.5
27.6
Intel Arc A580
183.8
142.4
128.4
101.3
64.4
30.3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)
220
158.3
139.7
106.9
65.4
30.1
AMD Radeon RX 6600
208
150
130.3
94.3
55.9
24.9
AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)
187.3
135.2
119.5
87.7
54
26.1
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)
164.9
107.7
129
80.4
54.2
25.3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)
165.4
116.3
101.7
75.3
44.1
18.1
PosModel< PrevNext >The Finals
low med. high ultra QHD 4K
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
107.8
75.2
65.8
48.6
28.2
6
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)
135.1
99.7
82.6
62.6
36.7
16.7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
142.45n2
123.6n2
95.5n2
54.6
27.3
40.6
Intel Arc A730M
144.7
109.2
97
77.4
48.9
22.7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
136.3
112.2
98.6
72.3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)
153.7
109.7
95.8
70.1
42
16.3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)
142.1
98.9
85.9
61.3
35.9
11.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
110.1
80.3
71.4
51.3
AMD Radeon RX 6500M
94
84.4
77.1
56.7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
101.7
77.9
68.4
49.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
107.7
76.4
67.8
50.9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
100.2
70.4
60.4
43.3
Intel Arc A380
86
62.4
53.8
40.5
Intel Arc A310
75
53.1
46.6
34.6
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
99.5
68.9
60.5
46.4
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
70
47.7
39.7
34.6
AMD Radeon 780M
73.2n2
55.1n2
49.55n2
33.8n2
22.1
9.7
NVIDIA GeForce MX350
31.5
22.4
17
12.8
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
31
21.8
18.5
11
Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
16.9
11.9
10.4
7.74
PosModel< PrevNext >The Finals
low med. high ultra QHD 4K
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
24.3
16.8
12.8
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
21.4
16.2
14.2
10.2
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
9.88
(-) * Smaller values are better. / n123 Number of benchmarks for this median value / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Test system details

笔记本电脑 显卡 处理器 内存
华硕 ROG Zephyrus M16 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 @150 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6X) Intel Core i9-13900H 2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 @175 W TGP (12 GB GDDR6X) Intel Core i9-13950HX 2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i9-13900HX 2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 2 x 8 GB DDR5
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 @100 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-13700H 2 x 8 GB DDR5
华硕 ROG Strix Scar 17 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti @150 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i9-12900H 2 x 16 GB DDR5
华硕 TUF Gaming Advantage A16 AMD Radeon RX 7600S (8 GB GDDR6) & AMD Radeon 780M AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 2 x 8 GB DDR5
塔式电脑 显卡 处理器 内存
华硕 ROG Strix Z790-F NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 (16 GB GDDR6X)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB GDDR6)
Intel Core i9-13900K 2 x 24 GB DDR5 G.Skill
4K 显示器 操作系统 Nvidia 驱动程序 AMD 驱动程序
Philips Evnia 42M2N8900 Windows 11 ForceWare 546.33 Adrenalin 23.12.1
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 总决赛回顾笔记本电脑和台式机基准测试
Florian Glaser, 2023-12-21 (Update: 2023-12-21)